Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of convalescent plasma compared to standard care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the CONCOR-1 trial.

BACKGROUND: The CONvalescent Plasma for Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19 Respiratory Illness (CONCOR-1) trial was a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing convalescent plasma in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of convalescent plasma and its impact on quality-of-life to provide insight into its potential as an alternative treatment in resource-constrained settings. METHODS: Individual patient data on health outcomes and resource utilization from the CONCOR-1 trial were used to conduct the analysis from the Canadian public payer's perspective with a time horizon of 30 days post-randomization. Baseline and 30-day EQ-5D-5L were measured to calculate quality-adjusted survival. All costs are presented in 2021 Canadian dollars. The base case assessed the EQ-5D-5L scores of hospitalized inpatients reporting at both timepoints, and a utility score of 0 was assigned for patients who died within 30 days. Costs for all patients enrolled were used. The sensitivity analysis utilizes EQ-5D-5L scores from the same population but only uses costs from this population. RESULTS: 940 patients were randomized: 627 received CCP and 313 received standard care. The total costs were $28,716 (standard deviation, $25,380) and $24,258 ($22,939) for the convalescent plasma and standard care arms respectively. EQ-5D-5L scores were 0.61 in both arms (p = .85) at baseline. At 30 days, EQ-5D-5L scores were 0.63 and 0.64 for patients in the convalescent plasma and standard care arms, respectively (p = .46). The incremental cost was $4458 and the incremental quality-adjusted life day was -0.078. DISCUSSION: Convalescent plasma was less effective and more costly than standard care in treating hospitalized COVID-19.

Isohemagglutinin titration in pooled and apheresis platelets.

BACKGROUND: Platelet inventory constraints necessitate ABO-incompatible platelet transfusion. Many minimize the hemolytic impact by confirming low titre (LT) donor isohemagglutinins. This process is costly. Pathogen-reduced platelets (PRP) in platelet additive solutions (PAS) will dilute plasma and decrease high-titre isohemagglutinins (HT). We determined the proportion of HT platelets and incompatible transfusions for units suspended in plasma to reassess the need for titres following introduction of PRP/PAS. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our titre method is manual tube (1:50) dilution of platelet supernatant from apheresis or whole blood derived buffy coat pools suspended in plasma, tested with A1/B red cells. Testing included 49,058 pooled and 11,738 apheresis platelets over 4 years. The HT proportion, rate of out-of-group transfusions, and hemolytic reactions were determined. The impact of PAS dilution was estimated. RESULTS: Totally 60,796 platelet units were tested. Group O pooled and group B apheresis platelets had HT in 6.6% and 5.7%, respectively. Group A pooled and apheresis platelets included 2% with HT. Approximately 25% of platelets transfused were ABO-incompatible and no hemolytic reactions were reported. Based on the proportions of PAS-E and plasma for PRP platelets, plasma from each donor comprises 11 mL (6% of total volume) vs 20-257 mL in untreated pools. PAS-E will replace and dilute residual plasma by at least 50%. DISCUSSION: Rare platelet pools may demonstrate HT. PRP platelets with PAS will reduce titres and may abrogate the need for titration. A strategy of group specific transfusion or transfusion of group A PRP platelet transfusions may be a safe alternative.

The role of RBC antigen transgene integration sites on RBC biology in mice.

BACKGROUND: Transgenic mice expressing RBC specific antigens are widely used in mechanistic studies of RBC alloimmunization. Existing RBC donor strains have random transgene integration, potentially disrupting host elements that can confound biological interpretation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Integration site and genomic alterations were characterized by both targeted locus amplification and congenic backcrossing in the five most commonly used RBC alloantigen donor strains (KEL-K2hi , KEL-K2med , and KEL-K2lo , and KEL-K1). A targeted transgenic approach was developed to allow RBC specific transgene expression from a safe harbor locus (ROSA26). Alloimmune responses were assessed by transfusing alloantigen expressing RBCs into wild-type recipients and measuring alloantibodies by flow cytometry. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Four of the five analyzed strains had at least one gene disrupted by the transgene integration but none of the disrupted genes are known to be involved in RBC biology. The integration of KEL-K2med potentially altered the immunological properties of RBCs, although the biological significance of the observed changes is unclear. The ROSA26 targeted approach resulted in a single copy of the transgene that maintains RBC specific expression without random disruption of genomic elements. CONCLUSION: These findings provide a detailed characterization of genomic disruption by transgene integration found in commonly used RBC donor strains that is relevant to numerous previous publications as well as future studies. With the possible exception of KEL-K2med , transgene integration is not predicted to affect RBC biology in existing models, and new models can avoid this concern using the described targeted transgenic approach.

Production of recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-human neutrophil antigen (HNA) antibodies with potential applicability as standard antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies against human neutrophil antigen (HNA) are involved in the pathogenesis of neonatal alloimmune neutropenia, autoimmune neutropenia, and transfusion-related acute lung injury. The present methods for anti-HNA antibody identification strongly depend on the presence of standard antisera with known allo/isospecificities. Here, we aimed to produce recombinant humanized antibodies to HNA from available mouse monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RNAs were extracted from available hybridoma cells producing mouse anti-HNA antibodies recognizing HNA-1a (TAG-1), -1b (TAG-2), -2 (TAG-4), and FcγRIIIb, and the cDNA was synthesized. Recombinant fragments consisting of the variable regions of the H and L chains of the mouse MoAb ligated to the constant region of human IgG were incorporated into an expression vector and transfected into CHO cells. Antibody specificity of the selected humanized monoclonal antibodies was confirmed, and tested by the participants of the ISBT Granulocyte Immunobiology Working Party (GIWP) workshop 2020. RESULTS: GIFT results confirmed the specific reactivity of TAGH-1 to -4, except for a cross-reactivity of TAGH-2 with HNA-1a/a neutrophils, only in flow-cytometry. MAIGA results showed clear specificity of all humanized antibodies, but the selection of the appropriate capture monoclonal antibody was essential for the test. The results of the ISBT GIWP showed high concordance among the labs. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first humanized monoclonal antibodies to HNA-1 and HNA-2 antigens produced and they will be important standard reagents for laboratories testing for neutrophil antibodies. We plan to have these humanized MoAbs available through WHO.

Loss of heterozygosity leading to incorrect HLA typing for platelet-transfusion refractory patient.

BACKGROUND: Management of platelet-transfusion refractory (PR) patients due to anti-HLA antibodies includes the provision of HLA-matched (HLAm) platelets (PLT) or PLTs that are negative for HLA antigens corresponding to the recipient antibodies. Obtaining HLAm PLTs is predicated on accurate HLA antigen typing of the recipient and donor. Here, we present the clinical implications of a case involving loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in a patient presented for PR workup. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: HLA typing was performed by three methods: (1) Real-time PCR; (2) Sequence-specific oligonucleotide (SSO) typing test; and (3) Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Cytogenomic SNP microarray was utilized to assess LOH. RESULTS: A 30-year-old female with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia was found to be PR secondary to HLA sensitization. A peripheral blood (PB) sample, containing 93% myeloid blast cells, was sent for HLA typing for the provision of HLAm PLTs. HLA typing revealed homozygosity at the HLA-A locus but was heterozygous at the -B and -C loci. After chemotherapy, HLA typing on a new PB sample, devoid of blast cells, identified HLA-A locus heterozygosity, which was subsequently confirmed by real-time PCR and NGS. Cytogenomic SNP microarray analysis demonstrated LOH of the HLA-A locus on chromosome 6p in the pretreatment sample but not in the posttreatment sample. CONCLUSION: In hematologic patients with high tumor burden, HLA homozygosity should be viewed with suspicion for potential LOH. Therefore, HLA testing should be repeated, preferably with a non-hematological source (e.g., buccal swab) or following successful reduction of the tumor burden.

Three patients highlighting potential pitfalls in platelet refractory testing.

BACKGROUND: Platelet-transfusion refractory (PR) patients do not achieve expected post-transfusion platelet counts. We investigate suspected PR patients with post-transfusion platelet counts, indirect platelet antibody screens (ind-PAS), Class I HLA antibody tests (HLA-Scr), and physical platelet crossmatch (PXM) studies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The three following cases describe possible pitfalls of laboratory tests used in PR workup and management. RESULTS: Case #1: Antibody testing detected antibodies to only HLA-B13, corresponding to a 4% calculated panel reactive antibodies (CPRA; 96% predicted donor compatibility). However, PXM showed the patient compatible with 11/14 (79%) donors; two of the PXM-incompatible units were ABO-incompatible. Case #2: PXM revealed compatibility with 1/14 screened donors; however, the patient did not respond to the product from the compatible donor. The patient did respond to HLA-matched product. Dilution studies provided evidence of the prozone effect, which caused negative PXM despite clinically relevant antibodies. Case #3: There was a discrepancy between the ind-PAS and HLA-Scr. Ind-PAS was negative for HLA antibodies, while HLA-Scr was positive and specificity testing corresponded to 38% CPRA. Per the package insert, the sensitivity of ind-PAS is ~85% compared to HLA-Scr. DISCUSSION: These cases highlight the importance of investigating incongruent results. Cases #1 and #2 demonstrate PXM pitfalls: ABO incompatibility can result in positive PXM and false-negative PXM can occur in the setting of the prozone effect. Case #3 reveals the importance of knowing a test's sensitivity. Centers that only perform ind-PAS may fail to detect HLA antibodies.

Risk factors for T-cell lymphopenia in frequent platelet donors: The BEST collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: Severe T-cell lymphopenia of uncertain clinical significance has been observed in frequent apheresis platelet donors. Two commonly used plateletpheresis instruments are the Trima Accel, which uses a leukoreduction system (LRS) chamber to trap leukocytes and the Fenwal Amicus, which does not use an LRS chamber. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed an international, multicenter, observational study comparing T-cell populations in frequent platelet donors collected exclusively using the Trima instrument (n = 131) or the Amicus instrument (n = 77). Age- and sex-matched whole blood donors (n = 126) served as controls. RESULTS: CD4+ T-cell counts <200 cells/µL were found in 9.9% of frequent Trima (LRS+) platelet donors, 4.4% of frequent Amicus (LRS-) platelet donors, and 0 whole blood donors (p < .0001). CD4+ T-cell counts <200 cells/µL were only seen in platelet donors with ≥200 lifetime donations. In multivariable analysis, age, lifetime donations, and instrument (Trima vs. Amicus) were independent risk factors for lymphopenia. In 40 Trima platelet donors, a plasma rinseback procedure was routinely performed following platelet collections. No Trima platelet donors receiving plasma rinseback had a CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/µL versus 13/91 Trima platelet donors not receiving plasma rinseback (p = .01). DISCUSSION: Recurrent bulk lymphocyte removal appears to contribute to the development of T-cell lymphopenia in frequent, long-term platelet donors. Lymphopenia is more common when an LRS chamber is used during platelet collection but can occur without an LRS chamber. Blood centers using LRS chambers can mitigate donor lymphopenia by performing plasma rinseback.

Platelet extracellular vesicles and their mitochondrial content improve the mitochondrial bioenergetics of cellular immune recipients.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondria play a critical role in the production of cell energy and the regulation of cell death. Therefore, mitochondria orchestrate numerous cell effector functions, including fine-tuning the immune system. While mitochondria are mainly found intracellularly, they can escape the confine of the cell during the process of extracellular vesicle release. Platelets patrol blood vessels to ensure vasculature integrity and to support the immune system. In blood, platelets are the primary source of circulating mitochondria. Activated platelets produce extracellular vesicles, including a subset of mitochondria-containing vesicles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We characterized mitochondrial functions in platelet-derived extracellular vesicles, and examined whether they could impact the bioenergetics of cellular immune recipients using an extracellular flux analyzer to measure real-time bioenergetics. RESULTS: We validated that extracellular vesicles derived from activated platelets contain the necessary mitochondrial machinery to respirate and generate energy. Moreover, neutrophils and monocytes efficiently captured platelet-derived extracellular vesicles, enhancing their mitochondrial fitness. This process required functional mitochondria from donor platelets, as it was abolished by the inactivation of extracellular mitochondria using mitochondrial poison. DISCUSSION: Together, the data suggest that extracellular mitochondria produced by platelets may support other metabolic functions through transcellular bioenergetics.

Exponential increase in neutralizing and spike specific antibodies following vaccination of COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors.

BACKGROUND: With the recent approval of COVID-19 vaccines, recovered COVID-19 subjects who are vaccinated may be ideal candidates to donate COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP). CASE SERIES: Eleven recovered COVID-19 patients were screened to donate CCP. All had molecularly confirmed COVID-19, and all but one were antibody positive by chemiluminescence immunoassay (DiaSorin) prior to vaccination. All were tested again for antibodies 11-21 days after they were vaccinated (Pfizer/Moderna). All showed dramatic increases (~50-fold) in spike-specific antibody levels and had at least a 20-fold increase in the IC50 neutralizing antibody titer based on plaque reduction neutralization testing (PRNT). The spike-specific antibody levels following vaccination were significantly higher than those seen in any non-vaccinated COVID-19 subjects tested to date at our facility. CONCLUSION: Spike-specific and neutralizing antibodies demonstrated dramatic increases following a single vaccination after COVID-19 infection, which significantly exceeded values seen with COVID-19 infection alone. Recovered COVID-19 subjects who are vaccinated may make ideal candidates for CCP donation.

Neutralizing activity to SARS-CoV-2 of convalescent and control plasma used in a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the neutralizing activity of convalescent plasma (CP) administered in randomized controlled trials (RCT) of COVID-19 infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: As part of an RCT, CP was collected per FDA guidelines from individuals recovered from COVID-19 infection. CP donors had to have ≥145 optical density (OD) units (ideal target ≥300) using a semiquantitative, immunochromatographic test for IgG antibody to the nucleocapsid protein (NP) of SARS-CoV-2 (typical range 0-500 OD units). A random subset of samples [14 control plasma, 12 CP "medium-anti-NP" (145-299 OD units), and 13 CP "high" anti-NP (≥300 OD units)] were tested for neutralizing antibodies using an established viral luciferase antibody inhibition assay to detect the infection of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus that encoded spike protein (SARS2-Strunc ) on a human immunodeficiency virus 1 vector (NL43dEnvNanoLuc), using ACE2-expressing 293 T cells. The titer needed to neutralize 50% of viral activity (NT50) was calculated. RESULTS: The uptake of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus by 293TACE2 cells was inhibited by pretreatment with CP compared to control CP (p < .001) with control plasma having a median (IQR) 50% neutralization titer (NT50) of 1:28 (1:16,1:36) compared to 1:334 (1:130,1:1295) and 1:324 (1:244,1:578), for medium anti-NP and high anti-NP CP units, respectively. The neutralizing activity of CP met minimum FDA criteria with neutralizing antibody titers >1:80 in 100% of randomly selected samples, using a conservative approach that excluded non-specific binding. DISCUSSION: Plasma from donors screened using an immunochromatographic test for IgG antibody to SARS-CoV-2 NP exhibited neutralizing activity meeting FDA's minimum standard in all randomly selected COVID-19 CP units.

Immune thrombocytopenia induced by beta-lactam antibiotics: Cross-reactions of responsible antibodies with other beta-lactam drugs.

BACKGROUND: Beta-lactam antibiotics are a relatively common cause of immune thrombocytopenia. Because the many beta-lactam drugs now in clinical use have structural similarities, when a patient experiences this complication the question of whether an alternative member of this drug family can safely be used often arises but there are little data available to guide this decision. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Drug-dependent, platelet-reactive antibodies from 32 patients who experienced thrombocytopenia while being treated with a beta-lactam drug of the penam (piperacillin, etc.) or cephem (ceftriaxone etc.) groups were studied for serologic cross-reactivity with other drugs from these families using flow cytometry. Cross-reactions observed were analyzed for correlations with structural features of the drugs tested. RESULTS: Among 14 antibodies specific for penam drugs, five "strong" cross-reactions with other penam drugs were found. Among 18 antibodies specific for cephem drugs, 8 "strong cross-reactions were identified. Antibodies induced by penam drugs did not cross-react strongly with cephem drugs and vice versa. A strong correlation between cross-reactions and similar or identical R1 side groups of the beta-lactams studied was observed. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that patients who experience immune thrombocytopenia while being treated with a beta-lactam of the penam group can safely be treated with a cephem drug and vice versa. If a patient is to be switched to another beta lactam within the same group, the likelihood of serologic cross-reactivity can be minimized by choosing an agent with a distinctly different R1 side group.

Impact of serological and PCR testing requirements on the selection of COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors.

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma is undergoing randomized trials as a potential therapeutic option for COVID-19 infection. Little empirical evidence exists regarding the determination of donor eligibility and experiences with donor selection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in New York to select plasma donors for a randomized, double-blind, controlled convalescent plasma trial. Clearance for donation required successful completion of an online questionnaire and an in-person screening visit, which included (a) completion of a Donor Health Questionnaire (DHQ), (b) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody testing using an immunochromatographic anti- severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test, (c) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing if <28 days from symptom resolution, and (d) routine blood bank testing. RESULTS: After receiving 3093 online questionnaires, 521 individuals presented for in-person screening visits, with 40.1% (n = 209) fully qualifying. Subjects (n = 312) failed to progress due to the following reasons: disqualifying answer from DHQ (n = 30, 9.6%), insufficient antibodies (n = 198, 63.5%), persistent positive PCR tests (n = 14, 4.5%), and blood donation testing labs (n = 70, 22.4%). Importantly, 24.6% and 11.1% of potential donors who reported having PCR-diagnosed infection had low or undetectable SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels, respectively. Surprisingly, 62.9% (56/89) of subjects had positive PCR tests 14-27 days after symptom resolution, with 13 individuals continuing to be PCR positive after 27 days. CONCLUSION: It is feasible for a single site to fully qualify a large number of convalescent plasma donors in a short period of time. Among otherwise qualified convalescent plasma donors, we found high rates of low or undetectable antibody levels and many individuals with persistently positive PCR tests.

Transfusion reactions associated with COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy for SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma (CP) for treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has shown preliminary signs of effectiveness in moderate to severely ill patients in reducing mortality. While studies have demonstrated a low risk of serious adverse events, the comprehensive incidence and nature of the spectrum of transfusion reactions to CP is unknown. We retrospectively examined 427 adult inpatient CP transfusions to determine incidence and types of reactions, as well as clinical parameters and risk factors associated with transfusion reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed for 427 transfusions to 215 adult patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) within the Mount Sinai Health System, through the US Food and Drug Administration emergency investigational new drug and the Mayo Clinic Expanded Access Protocol to Convalescent Plasma approval pathways. Transfusions were blindly evaluated by two reviewers and adjudicated by a third reviewer in discordant cases. Patient demographics and clinical and laboratory parameters were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-five reactions from 427 transfusions were identified (12.9% incidence), and 13 were attributed to transfusion (3.1% incidence). Reactions were classified as underlying COVID-19 (76%), febrile nonhemolytic (10.9%), transfusion-associated circulatory overload (9.1%), and allergic (1.8%) and hypotensive (1.8%) reactions. Statistical analysis identified increased transfusion reaction risk for ABO blood group B or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores of 12 to 13, and decreased risk within the age group of 80 to 89 years. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of CP as a safe, therapeutic option from a transfusion reaction perspective, in the setting of COVID-19. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical significance of ABO group B, age, and predisposing disease severity in the incidence of transfusion reaction events.