ABSTRACT
In response to DNA damage, bacterial RecA protein forms filaments with the assistance of DinI protein. The RecA filaments stimulate the autocleavage of LexA, the repressor of more than 50 SOS genes, and activate the SOS response. During the late phase of SOS response, the RecA filaments stimulate the autocleavage of UmuD and λ repressor CI, leading to mutagenic repair and lytic cycle, respectively. Here, we determined the cryo-electron microscopy structures of Escherichia coli RecA filaments in complex with DinI, LexA, UmuD, and λCI by helical reconstruction. The structures reveal that LexA and UmuD dimers bind in the filament groove and cleave in an intramolecular and an intermolecular manner, respectively, while λCI binds deeply in the filament groove as a monomer. Despite their distinct folds and oligomeric states, all RecA filament binders recognize the same conserved protein features in the filament groove. The SOS response in bacteria can lead to mutagenesis and antimicrobial resistance, and our study paves the way for rational drug design targeting the bacterial SOS response.
Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Proteins , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Escherichia coli Proteins/metabolism , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , SOS Response, Genetics , Cryoelectron Microscopy , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/metabolism , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Rec A Recombinases/metabolismABSTRACT
Using a newly developed microsecond pressure-jump apparatus, we monitor the refolding kinetics of the helix-stabilized five-helix bundle protein λ*YA, the Y22W/Q33Y/G46,48A mutant of λ-repressor fragment 6-85, from 3 µs to 5 ms after a 1,200-bar P-drop. In addition to a microsecond phase, we observe a slower 1.4-ms phase during refolding to the native state. Unlike temperature denaturation, pressure denaturation produces a highly reversible helix-coil-rich state. This difference highlights the importance of the denatured initial condition in folding experiments and leads us to assign a compact nonnative helical trap as the reason for slower P-jump-induced refolding. To complement the experiments, we performed over 50 µs of all-atom molecular dynamics P-drop refolding simulations with four different force fields. Two of the force fields yield compact nonnative states with misplaced α-helix content within a few microseconds of the P-drop. Our overall conclusion from experiment and simulation is that the pressure-denatured state of λ*YA contains mainly residual helix and little ß-sheet; following a fast P-drop, at least some λ*YA forms misplaced helical structure within microseconds. We hypothesize that nonnative helix at helix-turn interfaces traps the protein in compact nonnative conformations. These traps delay the folding of at least some of the population for 1.4 ms en route to the native state. Based on molecular dynamics, we predict specific mutations at the helix-turn interfaces that should speed up refolding from the pressure-denatured state, if this hypothesis is correct.
Subject(s)
Bacteriophage lambda/metabolism , Protein Folding , Protein Structure, Secondary , Repressor Proteins/chemistry , Viral Proteins/chemistry , Computer Simulation , Hot Temperature , Kinetics , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Mutation , Pressure , Spectrometry, Fluorescence , Spectrophotometry, Infrared , Temperature , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Bacteriophage lambda repressor controls the lysogeny/lytic growth switch after infection of E. coli by lambda phage. In order to study in detail the looping of DNA mediated by the protein, tag-free repressor and a loss-of-cooperativity mutant were expressed in E.coli and purified by (1) ammonium sulfate fractionation, (2) anion-exchange chromatography and (3) heparin affinity chromatography. This method employs more recently developed and readily available chromatography resins to produce highly pure protein in good yield. In tethered particle motion looping assays and atomic force microscopy "footprinting" assays, both the wild-type protein and a C-terminal His-tagged variant, purified using immobilized metal affinity chromatography, bound specifically to high affinity sites to mediate loop formation. In contrast the G147D loss-of-cooperativity mutant bound specifically but did not secure loops.
Subject(s)
Bacteriophage lambda/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/isolation & purification , Repressor Proteins/isolation & purification , Viral Regulatory and Accessory Proteins/isolation & purification , Ammonium Sulfate/chemistry , Chromatography, Affinity , Chromatography, Ion Exchange , Escherichia coli/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Viral Regulatory and Accessory Proteins/genetics , Viral Regulatory and Accessory Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Because steric crowding is most effective when the crowding agent is similar in size to the molecule that it acts upon and the average macromolecule inside cells is much larger than a small protein or peptide, steric crowding is not predicted to affect their folding inside cells. On the other hand, chemical interactions should perturb in-cell structure and stability because they arise from interactions between the surface of the small protein or peptide and its environment. Indeed, previous in vitro measurements of the λ-repressor fragment, λ6-85 , in crowding matrices comprised of Ficoll or protein crowders support these predictions. Here, we directly quantify the in-cell stability of λ6-85 and distinguish the contribution of steric crowding and chemical interactions to its stability. Using a FRET-labeled λ6-85 construct, we find that the fragment is stabilized by 5°C in-cells compared to in vitro. We demonstrate that this stabilization cannot be explained by steric crowding because, as anticipated, Ficoll has no effect on λ6-85 stability. We find that the in-cell stabilization arises from chemical interactions, mimicked in vitro by mammalian protein extraction reagent (M-PER™). Comparison between FRET values in-cell and in Ficoll confirms that U-2 OS cytosolic crowding is reproduced at macromolecule concentrations of 15% w/v. Our measurements validate the cytomimetic of 15% Ficoll and 20% M-PER™ that we previously developed for protein and RNA folding studies. However, because the in-cell stability of λ6-85 is reproduced by 20% v/v M-PER™ alone, we predict that this simplified mixture could be a useful tool to predict the in-cell behaviors of other small proteins and peptides.
Subject(s)
Mammals , Protein Folding , Animals , Ficoll/chemistry , Protein StabilityABSTRACT
Understanding the relationship between the amino-acid sequence of a protein and its ability to fold and to function is one of the major challenges of protein science. Here, cases are reviewed in which mutagenesis, biochemistry, structure determination, protein engineering, and single-molecule biophysics have illuminated the sequence determinants of folding, binding specificity, and biological function for DNA-binding proteins and ATP-fueled machines that forcibly unfold native proteins as a prelude to degradation. In addition to structure-function relationships, these studies provide information about folding intermediates, mutations that accelerate folding, slow unfolding, and stabilize proteins against denaturation, show how new binding specificities and folds can evolve, and reveal strategies that proteolytic machines use to recognize, unfold, and degrade thousands of distinct substrates.
Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphate/chemistry , DNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , History, 20th Century , Mutation , Protein Binding , Protein Folding , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs , Protein Stability , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Structure-Activity Relationship , Substrate SpecificityABSTRACT
We investigated how the processing of a given antigen by antigen presenting cells (APC) is dictated by the conformation of the antigen and how this governs the immunodominance hierarchy. To address the question, a known immunodominant sequence of bacteriophage lambda repressor N-terminal sequence 12-26 [λR(12-26)] was engineered at the N and C termini of a heterologous leishmanial protein, Kinetoplastid membrane protein-11 (KMP-11); the resulting proteins were defined as N-KMP-11 and C-KMP-11 respectively. The presence of λR(12-26) in N-KMP-11 and C-KMP-11 was established by western blot analysis with antibody to λR(12-26) peptide. N-KMP-11 but not C-KMP-11 could stimulate the anti λR(12-26) T-cell clonal population very efficiently in the presence of APCs. Priming of BALB/c mice with N-KMP-11 or C-KMP-11 generated similar levels of anti-KMP-11 IgG, but anti-λR(12-26) specific IgG was observed only upon priming with N-KMP-11. Interestingly, uptake of both N-KMP-11 and C-KMP-11 by APCs was similar but catabolism of N-KMP-11 but not C-KMP-11 was biphasic and fast at the initial time point. Kratky plots of small angle X-ray scattering showed that while N-KMP-11 adopts flexible Gaussian type of topology, C-KMP-11 prefers Globular nature. To show that KMP-11 is not unique as a carrier protein, an epitope (SPITBTNLBTMBK) of Plasmodium yoelii (PY) apical membrane protein 1[AMA-1 (136-148)], is placed at the C and N terminals of a dominant T-cell epitope of ovalbumin protein OVA(323-339) and the resulting peptides are defined as PY-OVA and OVA-PY respectively. Interestingly, only OVA-PY could stimulate anti-OVA T-cells and produce IgG response upon priming of BALB/c mice with it. Thus for rational design of peptide vaccine it is important to place the dominant epitope appropriately in the context of the carrier protein.