Electrophysiological demonstration of nonselective His-Purkinje system capture with para-Hisian pacing.

BACKGROUND: The adverse effects of conventional right ventricular (RV) apical pacing prompted the search for more physiological pacing sites, such as selective and nonselective His bundle pacing (HBP), a variant of nonselective HBP (para-Hisian pacing), and mid-septal pacing. However, knowledge of their true benefit on the physiology of ventricular activation, lead stability, and pacing thresholds is limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 152 consecutive patients (mean age 61 ± 24, 63% men) in this retrospective study. Of these, 137 patients with different bradyarrhythmias underwent active fixation lead implantation at the RV apex (n = 54), para-Hisian region (n = 66), or mid interventricular septum (n = 17). Fifteen patients with ventricular preexcitation due to an accessory pathway not undergoing pacing were included as controls. A 12­lead ECG was recorded in all patients, and cardiac electrical synchrony was assessed using the Synchromax® cross-correlation cardiac synchrony index (CSI). RESULTS: QRS duration was prolonged in all pacing sites: from 114 ± 28 to 160 ± 29 (RV apex), from 110 ± 28 to 122 ± 29 (para-Hisian), and from 121 ± 24 to 154 ± 30 (mid interventricular septum). The CSI was significantly improved only in patients undergoing para-Hisian pacing, despite a slight widening of the QRS interval. There was no difference in pacing thresholds and sensed R-wave voltage between pacing sites. Only 1 lead, implanted at the para-Hisian region (1.5%), was dislodged towards the mid septum 48 h after implantation but did not require repositioning. CONCLUSIONS: QRS duration was not associated with changes in CSI, meaning that QRS width does not significantly affect electrical synchrony.

Nonselective versus selective His bundle pacing: An acute intrapatient speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the acute differences in left ventricular (LV) function and mechanical synchrony during nonselective His bundle pacing (ns-HBP) versus selective His bundle pacing (s-HBP) using strain echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with permanent His bundle pacing, in whom it was possible to obtain both s-HBP and ns-HBP, were studied in two centers. In each patient, echocardiography was performed sequentially during s-HBP and ns-HBP. Speckle-tracking echocardiography parameters were analyzed: Global longitudinal strain (GLS), the time delay between peak systolic strain in the basal septal and basal lateral segments (BS-BL delay), peak strain dispersion (PSD) and strain delay index. Right ventricle function was assessed using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tissue Doppler velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus (S'). A total of 69 patients (age: 75.6 ± 10.5 years; males: 75%) were enrolled. There were no differences in LV ejection fraction and GLS between s-HBP and ns-HBP modes: 59% versus 60%, and -15.6% versus -15.7%, respectively; as well as no difference in BS-BL delay and strain delay index. The PSD value was higher in the ns-HBP group than in the s-HBP group with the most pronounced difference in the basal LV segments. No differences in right ventricular function parameters (TAPSE and S') were found. CONCLUSION: The ns-HBP and s-HBP modes seem comparable regarding ventricular function. The dyssynchrony parameters were significantly higher during ns-HBP, however, the difference seems modest and clarification of its impact on LV function requires a larger long-term study.

ECG parameters to predict left ventricular electrical delay.

AIMS: Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony lengthens the left ventricular electrical delay (LVED), measured from QRS onset to the first peak of the LV electrogram. We constructed an ECG model to predict LVED noninvasively. METHODS: Intrapatient LVED was measured during a baseline vs nonselective His bundle pacing (nHBP) protocol. This setup provided paired synchronic/non-synchronic LVEDs, allowing intrapatient comparisons. Crosscorrelation of leads II and V6 was accomplished and extracted features together with age and gender fed a linear mixed effects model to predict LVED. RESULTS: Hemodynamic increments were consistent with LVED advances under nHBP in a subset of 17 patients (dP/dtmax, baseline: 938.82 ± 241.95 mm Hg/s vs nHBP: 1034.94 ± 253.63 mm Hg/s, p = 6.24e-4). The inclusion of the area under V6 (AV 6) and the time shift of R-peaks obtained from the crosscorrelation signal (CorS) grouped by patient significantly improved LVED estimation with respect to the model based only on QRS duration, age and gender (p = 1.7e-5). CONCLUSIONS: Interlead ECG changes explained LVED, providing clues about the electrical impulse conduction within the left ventricle noninvasively.

Permanent nonselective His bundle pacing in an adult with L-transposition of the great arteries and complete AV block.

We report the placement of a permanent transvenous nonselective His bundle pacing lead in conjunction with a transvenous pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in an adult with Levo-Transposition of the Great Arteries (L-TGA) and a stenotic coronary sinus (CS) ostium, which would not accommodate a transvenous left ventricular (LV) pacing lead. Nonselective His bundle pacing provided a nearly identical ventricular activation pattern in this previously unpaced patient. Many L-TGA patients will have an eventual need for permanent pacing and, given the challenges of CS cannulation, His bundle pacing may represent a preferred modality rather than pure morphologic LV pacing or surgical systemic ventricular lead placement to achieve optimal electrical synchrony.

Anatomical approach to permanent His bundle pacing: Optimizing His bundle capture.

Permanent His bundle pacing is a physiological alternative to right ventricular pacing. In this article we describe our approach to His bundle pacing in patients with AV nodal and intra-Hisian conduction disease. It is essential for the implanters to understand the anatomic variations of the His bundle course and its effect on the type of His bundle pacing achieved. We describe several case examples to illustrate our anatomical approach to permanent His bundle pacing in this article.

Effect of Nonselective His Bundle Pacing on Delayed Myocardial Activation in Left-axis Deviation and Left Bundle Branch Block.

It has been suggested that nonselective His bundle pacing (NS-HBP) corrects terminal conduction delay in right bundle branch block by early excitation of the right ventricular free wall. A similar analysis of NS-HBP, in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left-axis deviation (LAD) has not been done. Therefore, we compared the baseline QRS parameters in LAD and LBBB during NS-HBP and selective HBP (S-HBP). In LAD patients (n = 16), NS-HBP normalized the QRS axis from -35° ± 10° to 30° ± 34° (p < 0.01) and increased the lead 1 voltage (L1V) from 0.55 ± 0.3 mV to 0.88 ± 0.2 mV (p < 0.001) without increasing the peak lateral wall activation time (PLWAT) (p = not significant). In 23 of 41 LBBB patients, NS-HBP decreased the prolonged PLWAT by 73 ms (p < 0.0001), resolved the mid-QRS notch, normalized the QRS axis, and increased the L1V from 0.5 ± 0.3 mV to 1.15 ± 0.3 mV (p < 0.0001). In the remaining 18 LBBB patients, NS-HBP did not resolve the mid-QRS notch; however, the peak septal activation time decreased by 45 ms (p < 0.0001), PLWAT decreased by 53 ms (p < 0.0001), L1V increased from 0.5 ± 0.3 mV to 0.87 ± 0.4 mV (p < 0.0001), and the QRS axis normalized. All patients who developed S-HBP at lower pacing showed uncorrected LBBB (n = 6) or LAD (n = 7). In conclusion, NS-HBP, which causes myocardial activation in advance of simultaneously initiated S-HBP, results in a paced QRS complex with a normal axis and shorter activation times and restores the L1V in patients with LAD and LBBB. In some patients, a mid-QRS notch was seen with NS-HBP, which suggests fusion with S-HBP, which conducts without LBBB correction. A higher L1V in association with a shorter PLWAT and a normal QRS axis suggests that a more organized degree of left ventricular activation occurs with NS-HBP as compared to LBBB.