ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide a detailed overview of complications associated with MitraClip therapy and its development over time with the aim to alert physicians for early recognition of complications and to offer treatment strategies for each complication, if possible. RECENT FINDINGS: The MitraClip system (MC) is the leading transcatheter technique to treat mitral regurgitation (MR) and has been established as a safe procedure with very low adverse event rates compared to mitral surgery at intermediate to high risk or in secondary MR. Lately, the fourth MC generation has been launched with novel technical features to facilitate device handling, decrease complication rates, and allow the treatment of even complex lesions. Although the complication rate is low, adverse events are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The most common complications are bleeding, acute kidney failure, procedure-induced mitral stenosis, and an iatrogenic atrial septal defect with unknown clinical impact.
Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The third-generation MitraClip NTR/XTR transcatheter edge-to-edge repair system was introduced to assist in leaflet grasping with the longer clip arms of MitraClip XTR and to improve ease of use with the modified delivery catheter. OBJECTIVES: The EXPAND study evaluated contemporary real-world outcomes in subjects with mitral regurgitation (MR) treated with the third-generation MitraClip NTR/XTR transcatheter edge-to-edge repair system. METHODS: EXPAND is a prospective, multicenter, international, single-arm study that enrolled patients with primary MR and secondary MR at 57 centers. Follow-up was conducted through 12 months. Echocardiograms were analyzed by an echocardiographic core laboratories. Study outcomes included: MR severity, functional capacity measured by New York Heart Association functional class, quality of life measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, heart failure hospitalizations, all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 1,041 patients were enrolled from April 2018 through March 2019, of which 50.5% had primary or mixed etiology. Implant success was 98.9%; 1.5 ± 0.6 clips were implanted per subject. Significant MR reduction from baseline (≥MR 3+: 56.0%) to 30 days (≤MR 1+:88.8%) was maintained through 1 year (MR ≤1+: 89.2%). A total of 84.5% and 93.0% of subjects in primary MR and secondary MR, respectively, had ≤1+ MR at 1 year. Significant improvements were observed in clinical outcomes (New York Heart Association functional class I/II in 80.3%, +21.6 improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score) at 1 year. All-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations at 1 year were 14.9% and 18.9%, respectively, which was significantly lower than previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates treatment with the third-generation system resulted in substantial reduction of MR in a contemporary real-world practice, compared with the results of earlier EVEREST and COAPT trials.(The MitraClip® EXPAND Study of the Next Generation of MitraClip® Devices [EXPAND]; NCT03502811).
Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies , Heart Failure , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Humans , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Failure/complications , Cardiac Catheterization , Cardiomyopathies/complicationsABSTRACT
Mitral valve dysfunction affects around 2% of the population and its incidence is still increasing, making it the second most common valvular heart disease, after aortic stenosis. Depending on the etiology of the disease, it can be classified into primary or secondary mitral regurgitation. The first line of treatment is optimal medical therapy. If ineffective, mitral valve intervention can be considered. For patients disqualified from surgical treatment, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the use of MitraClip may be considered. Over 100,000 MitraClip procedures have been performed which makes this the most established transcatheter technique for the treatment of severe mitral regurgitation. The aim of this review is to discuss the technical details of the MitraClip procedure, clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of MitraClip, complications related to the clip implantation alongside with acute complications based on the currently available evidence and clinical experience.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Humans , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Surgical Instruments , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) was first performed in 2003, and is now established across the developed world as an effective, minimally invasive treatment option for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). Multiple large registries have established the efficacy of mitral TEER in patients with primary or degenerative MR in whom surgery is considered prohibitive or high risk, while ongoing randomised-controlled trials will determine its role in younger and lower- risk patients. In patients with secondary or functional MR, in whom mitral valve surgery is not routinely recommended, the pivotal COAPT trial showed a profound reduction in both mortality and heart failure hospitalisation in carefully selected patients. NHS England approved the routine commissioning of mitral TEER in 2019, and following a substantial delay, due in large part to the COVID pandemic, the procedure is now widely available across the UK. This review article describes the TEER procedure, currently available devices, the underlying evidence base, and the key facts needed for clinicians to understand who, how, and where to refer patients for consideration of mitral TEER. The emerging role of TEER in patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation is also considered.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Increasing survival of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients comes at the price of a range of late complications-arrhythmias, heart failure, and valvular dysfunction. Transcatheter valve interventions have become a legitimate alternative to conventional surgical treatment in selected acquired heart disease patients. However, literature on technical aspects, hemodynamic effects, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous atrioventricular (AV) valve interventions in ACHD patients is scarce. METHOD: This is a descriptive cohort from CAHAL (Center of Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden). ACHD patients with severe AV valve regurgitation who underwent a transcatheter intervention in the period 2020-2022 were included. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were collected from patient records. RESULTS: Five ACHD patients with severe or torrential AV valve regurgitation are described. Two patients underwent a transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER), one patient underwent a valve-in-valve procedure, one patient received a Cardioband system, and one patient received both a Cardioband system and TEER. No periprocedural complications occurred. Post-procedural AV valve regurgitation as well as NYHA functional class improved in all patients. The median post-procedural NYHA functional class improved from 3.0 (IQR [2.5-4.0]) to 2.0 (IQR [1.5-2.5]). One patient died 9 months after the procedure due to advanced heart failure with multiorgan dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter valve repair is feasible and safe in selected complex ACHD patients. A dedicated heart team is essential for determining an individualized treatment strategy as well as pre- and periprocedural imaging to address the underlying mechanism(s) of AV regurgitation and guide the transcatheter intervention. Long-term follow-up is essential to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transcatheter AV valve repair in ACHD patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) associated with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) forebodes a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is a rapidly evolving technique for severe MR in haemodynamically stable patients. However, the safety and efficacy of TEER for severe MR in CS are not well established. Case summary: An 83-year-old male presented with dyspnoea and was hospitalized for heart failure. Chest X-ray revealed pulmonary oedema. Transthoracic echocardiography showed severely depressed ejection fraction (EF) with severe secondary MR. Right heart catheterization confirmed a low cardiac index. Diuretics and inotropes were administered. Due to persistent hypotension, we could not wean inotropes. The patient was deemed high risk for surgery by the heart team, and a decision was made to proceed with TEER with MitraClip. Under transoesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopic guidance, two MitraClips were deployed sequentially. The MR grade was reduced to two mild jets subsequently. The patient was weaned off inotropes and eventually discharged. At the 30-day follow-up, he was participating in physical activities such as golf. Discussion: Cardiogenic shock complicated by severe MR carries high mortality. With severe MR, the forward stroke volume is lower than the stated EF leading to poor organ perfusion. Inotropes and/or mechanical circulatory support devices are paramount for initial stabilization; however, they do not treat underlying MR. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip has been shown to improve survival in CS patients with severe MR in observational studies. However, prospective trials are lacking. Our case demonstrates the utility of MitraClip to treat severe secondary MR refractory to medical therapy in a CS patient. The heart team must evaluate risks and benefits of this therapy in CS patients.
ABSTRACT
Current guidelines support the use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for patients with both primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. We aimed to compare the prognoses of TEER in degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) vs. functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). A total of 208 consecutive patients who underwent TEER over a ten-year period were analyzed. Primary endpoints included rates of all-cause death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, hospitalizations for heart failure, mitral valve surgery, or TEER re-intervention). A total of 148 (71%) patients were identified with FMR, while 60 (29%) were identified with DMR. Patients in the FMR group were younger (77.2 ± 8.4 vs. 80.2 ± 7.2, p = 0.02), suffered more frequently from coronary artery disease (54.1% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.02), and atrial fibrillation/flutter (70.9% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.02). Rates of 1-year death (21.6% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.03) and MACE (41.2% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.02) were higher for the FMR group, as compared to the DMR group. After correcting for variables, FMR independently predicted rates of MACE (HR-1.78, 95% CI 1.23-2.48, p = 0.04) and had a non-significant effect on one-year mortality (HR-1.67, 95%CI 0.98-3.74, p = 0.07). In our experience, worse overall 1-year composite MACE outcomes were observed after TEER in patients with FMR as compared to patients with DMR.
ABSTRACT
The advent of transcatheter procedures for treatment of valvular heart disease has accelerated the pace of research in the diagnosis and treatment of heart valve disease. Rapid accumulation of novel knowledge in the field necessitates timely revisions of clinical guidelines. This paper comments on some important and novel issues addressed in the recently published American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.