The Effect of Flexor Digitorum Profundus Repair Position Relative to Camper Chiasm on Tendon Biomechanics.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of repairing a zone II flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) laceration anatomically versus extra-anatomically on tendon loads and work of flexion (WOF). METHODS: Twenty digits from 5 cadaveric specimens were tested using an in vitro active finger motion simulator under 2 FDP tendon repair conditions: anatomic and extra-anatomic. Tensile loads in FDP and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), WOF, and total active finger range of motion (ROM) were measured using in-line load cells and electromagnetic tracking, respectively. RESULTS: The anatomic repairs had no effect on tendon loads or WOF for either FDP or FDS. The extra-anatomic repairs increased FDP loads by 32% and decreased FDS loads by 9% compared with those in the intact condition. This pattern was similar for WOF following extra-anatomic repairs, which increased FDP WOF by 31% and decreased FDS WOF by 18%. Comparing the 2 repairs, FDP loads and WOF were 25% and 22% greater, respectively, with extra-anatomic repairs compared with anatomic repairs, with no significant change in FDS. Total active ROM was not affected by either repair. CONCLUSIONS: In this in vitro cadaveric model, extra-anatomic repairs of FDP increased tendon loads and WOF compared with anatomic repairs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: On the basis of this study, reconstitution of the anatomic relationship of FDP and FDS at the Camper chiasm during the repair of zone II flexor tendon lacerations is recommended.

The Evaluation of a Flexor Digitorum Profundus-to-Volar Plate Zone I Repair Versus Button Repair: An In vitro Biomechanics Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate joint kinematics and tendon work of flexion (WOF) following a flexor digitorum profundus (FDP)-to-volar plate (VP) repair technique relative to a pullout button for zone I flexor tendon injuries. METHODS: Fourteen digits were tested using an in vitro active finger motion simulator under 3 repaired conditions following a simulated zone I avulsion: button, FDP-VP, and "no slack" FDP-VP (corrected for additional VP length). Outcome metrics included active joint range of motion (ROM), fingertip strength, FDP and flexor digitorum superficialis tensile loads, and WOF. RESULTS: The button and FDP-VP techniques restored WOF to the intact condition for FDP and flexor digitorum superficialis. All repairs restored distal interphalangeal joint ROM and kinematics to the intact condition. Similarly, all repairs restored WOF; however, the "no slack" FDP-VP significantly increased WOF by 10% to 12% over the simple FDP-VP repair. The button technique had similar fingertip strength to the intact condition, whereas the FDP-VP repairs significantly reduced peak fingertip strength from intact, albeit only 1-2 N compared with the button repair. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro cadaveric model, the button and FDP-VP techniques restored WOF and ROM to within intact levels, with no difference between these repairs in all measured outcome metrics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on its initial strength and its equal biomechanical performance compared with the button repair, the FDP-VP technique may be a viable option for treating FDP avulsions.

The effect of barbed suture tendon repair on work of flexion.

PURPOSE: To compare the work of flexion, ultimate strength, and gap resistance of a conventional 4-strand tendon repair to a knotless barbed-suture 4-strand tendon repair. METHODS: Tendon repairs were performed on 16 cadaver flexor digitorum profundus tendons using either a 4-strand double Kessler repair or a similar but knotless 4-strand repair with a unidirectional barbed suture. Work of flexion, gap resistance during cyclical loading, and ultimate strength of both techniques were determined and their means compared. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean maximum load and gap formation between the 2 techniques. Work of flexion was higher for the barbed-suture repair group compared with the traditional repair group (39 N·mm vs 31 N·mm). CONCLUSIONS: The higher work of flexion in the barbed-suture group suggests that barbed suture may negatively affect tendon gliding within the flexor tendon sheath. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knotless barbed-suture tendon repair leads to increased work of flexion compared with traditional flexor tendon repairs, which may result in an increased rupture incidence.

Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon graft with different repair techniques and graft surface modification.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of modified repair techniques for flexor tendon reconstruction and the effects of surface modification using carbodiimide-derivatized synovial fluid plus gelatin (cd-SF-G), compared to the traditional repair techniques. The second and fifth digits from 16 canine forepaws were randomly divided into 4 groups: (1) traditional graft repairs (TGR group) including distal Bunnell repair and proximal Pulvertaft weave repair; (2) modified graft repairs (MGR group) including distal graft bony attachment repair and proximal step-cut repair; (3) group TGR coated with cd-SF-G (TGR-C group); and (4) group MGR coated with cd-SF-G (MGR-C group). Digit normalized work of flexion (nWOF), ultimate failure strength, and stiffness were measured. The nWOF in MGR group was significantly less than TGR group (p < 0.05). The nWOF in groups treated with cd-SF-G was significantly less than their untreated counterparts (p < 0.05). Ultimate load to failure of the MGR-C group was significantly greater than the TGR-C group (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in stiffness was found between these two groups. The modified techniques cannot only improve tendon gliding abilities but can also improve breaking strength. Additionally, surface modification with cd-SF-G significantly decreased the work of flexion.