Long-Term Pharmacokinetic Follow-Up of Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

This ABIGENE pharmacokinetic (PK) study sought mainly to characterize the unchanged drug PK during long-term abiraterone acetate (AA) administration in advanced prostate cancer patients (81 patients). It was observed that individual AA concentrations remained constant over treatment time, with no noticeable changes during repeated long-term drug administration for up to 120 days. There was no correlation between AA concentrations and survival outcomes. However, a significant association between higher AA concentrations and better clinical benefit was observed (p = 0.041). The safety data did not correlate with the AA PK data. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) was observed between mean AA concentration and patient age: the older the patient, the higher the AA concentration. Patient age was found to impact steady-state AA concentration: the older the patient, the higher the mean AA concentration. Altogether, these data may help to guide future research and clinical trials in order to maximize the benefits of AA metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Correlation Between Trough Level of Abiraterone and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND Prostate cancer growth is primarily driven by testosterone and 5a-dihydrotestosterone. Abiraterone is an irreversible inhibitor of CYP17, and CYP17 inhibition is a required step in testosterone biosynthesis. Previous studies have shown that abiraterone trough levels are predictive of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). It has not been demonstrated if this association exists for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). In this study, we aimed to explore the correlation and association between abiraterone trough levels and PSA levels in patients with mHSPC. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a single-center, prospective, observational study of patients with mHSPC being treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) 1000 mg once daily. Abiraterone trough levels (22-26 h after drug administration) were drawn at 1, 3, and 7 months after treatment initiation. RESULTS Thirteen patients with mHSPC were enrolled, and complete pharmacokinetic data were available for 8 patients. The mean trough levels at 1 month, 3 months, and 7 months were 34.49 ng/mL (3.36-240.46), 13.82 ng/mL (2.91-29.96), and 15.7 ng/mL (3.58-26.86), respectively. The correlation between the 1-month abiraterone trough level and 1-month PSA level was 0.29 (P=0.38), between 3-month abiraterone trough and 3-month PSA was -0.61 (P=0.08), and between 7-month abiraterone trough and 7-month PSA was -0.31 (P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a trend toward a negative correlation between 3-month abiraterone trough levels and PSA levels, but the correlation was not statistically significant. A study with a larger prospective sample size is needed to validate these findings.

A PK/PD study of Delta-4 abiraterone metabolite in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Δ4-abiraterone (Δ4A) is an activemetabolite of abiraterone (ABI), which is approved in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The contribution of Δ4A to the clinical antitumor activity of ABI remains unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between plasma Δ4A concentration and survival in 36 mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone acetate (1000 mg/day) plus prednisone (10 mg/day). Plasma trough ABI and Δ4A concentrations were monthly assayed using liquid chromatography during the first 3 months of treatment. ABI and Δ4A Cmin were defined as the mean of trough concentrations measured for each patient. Predictive factors regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored using univariate Cox model. Mean plasma ABI and Δ4A Cmin were 12.6 ± 6.8 ng/mL and 1.6 ± 1.3 ng/mL, respectively. The mean metabolic ratio Δ4A/ABI was of 0.18 ± 0.25. In regard with in vitro pharmacodynamic data, effective plasma concentrations for ABI and Δ4A were reached in 30 patients (83.3%) and only 2 patients (5.6%), respectively. Higher Δ4A Cmin was associated with shorter OS (Hazard ratio, HR 1.54; CI95% 1.06-2.22; p = 0.022) but not with PFS. The HR associated with the metabolic Δ4A/ABI ratio for PFS and OS were 7.80 (CI 95% 1.63-37.38; p = 0.010) and 12.52 (CI 95% 1.95-80.47, p = 0.0078), respectively. The present study shows Δ4A is unlikely to have meaningful contribution to pharmacodynamic activity of ABI in mCPRC, rather that higher plasma Δ4A concentration is associated with worse clinical outcomes. A high Δ4A/ABI metabolic ratio could help to identify mCRPC patients with poorer survival.

A clinically relevant decrease in abiraterone exposure associated with carbamazepine use in a patient with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer.

ADVERSE EVENT: Decreased abiraterone exposure after introducing carbamazepine. DRUGS IMPLICATED: Abiraterone acetate and carbamazepine. THE PATIENT: A 65-year-old man with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, was treated with abiraterone acetate and prednisolone, and received concomitant carbamazepine for treatment of facial neuropathy. EVIDENCE THAT LINKS THE DRUG TO THE EVENT: The interaction was confirmed by a decrease in abiraterone exposure >2-fold (area-under-the-curve and trough levels). After discontinuation of carbamazepine therapy, the abiraterone exposure normalized. No alternative causes were found that explain the decrease in abiraterone exposure. MECHANISM: Induction of CYP3A and potentially phase I metabolism (SULT2A1) by carbamazepine. IMPLICATIONS FOR THERAPY: Clinicians and pharmacists should be aware of this clinically relevant interaction. The national drug-drug interaction checker does not warn for this interaction, whereas both the Lexicomp® and Micromedex® advice to avoid if possible or to increase the abiraterone dose frequency to twice daily. Carbamazepine should not be combined with abiraterone to avoid underexposure and suboptimal therapy. Therapeutic drug monitoring of abiraterone is useful to guide therapy when drug-drug interactions cannot be avoided.

Evaluation of reference-scaled average bioequivalence of two oral formulations of abiraterone acetate in healthy Chinese subjects
.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and bioequivalence (BE) of two 250-mg tablet formulations of abiraterone acetate: a newly developed generic formulation (test) and a branded formulation (reference) in healthy adult Chinese subjects under fasted (n = 40) and fed (n = 40) conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The comparison was performed using a single-dose, open, randomized, and four-way replicate study. The concentration of abiraterone in blood samples taken over 48 hours was determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). To assess the BE of the test and reference formulations, confidence intervals (CI, 90%) for the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curves (AUC0-t and AUC0-∞) were calculated using the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) method. RESULTS: The results showed that the 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ in the fasted study were 90.14 - 114.11, 93.96 - 115.07, and 93.72 - 113.331, respectively. For the fed study, the 90% CIs were 81.83 - 102.51, 91.51 - 104.89, and 91.46 - 104.58, respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the tested 250-mg abiraterone tablets were bioequivalent to 250-mg Zytiga tablets (reference) under both fasted and fed conditions. In addition, food intake increased the systemic exposure and Cmax of abiraterone by 3-fold and 7-fold, respectively.
.

The impact of statin use on the efficacy of abiraterone acetate in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Statins compete with DHEAS for influx through the SLCO2B1 transporter, which may prolong time to progression (TTP) on androgen deprivation therapy. Abiraterone acetate (AA) may also undergo SLCO-mediated transport. Based on preclinical findings showing antagonism, we hypothesized that statins may compete with AA for influx via SLCO2B1 and could negatively impact drug efficacy. METHODS: We queried two institutional clinical databases (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute [DFCI], Johns Hopkins University [JHU]) for CRPC patients treated with AA. Treatment duration was a surrogate for TTP. Associations between statin use and AA duration were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression modeling adjusted for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of the 224 DFCI and 270 JHU patients included, the majority (96%) had metastatic disease. Nearly half (41% and 45%) were statin users. In the DFCI cohort, there was a trend toward longer AA duration in statin users: 14.2 versus 9.2 months (HR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.57-1.09, P = 0.14). There was no association between statin use and AA duration in the JHU cohort: 8.3 versus 8.0 months (HR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.69-1.16, P = 0.38) in the statin users versus non-users, except for a trend in patients that had not previously received docetaxel or enzalutamide (HR 0.79; 95%CI: 0.57-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our initial hypothesis, there was a trend toward longer (rather than shorter) AA duration in statin users in the entire DFCI cohort and in the enzalutamide- and docetaxel-naïve JHU patients. Together, these results do not support the hypothesis that statins interfere with AA efficacy.

Influence of abiraterone acetate on neuroendocrine differentiation in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To determine the influence of abiraterone Acetate (AA) on neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: We conducted an analysis in 115 chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients who would be treated with chemotherapy. The serum levels of chromogranin A (CgA), neurone-specific enolase (NSE) were measured in 67 mCRPC patients without AA treatment and 48 patients after the failure of AA treatment, in which these markers were also measured in 34 patients before and after 6 months of AA treatment. Comparative t-test was used to evaluate the serial changes of serum NED markers during AA treatment and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test the influence of AA treatment on NED. RESULTS: Serum CgA were NSE were evaluated to be above the upper limit of normal (ULN) in 56 (48.7%) and 29 (25.2%) patients before chemotherapy. In 34 patients with serial evaluation, serum CgA level of 14 patients and NSE of 14 patients increased after the failure of AA treatment. There was no significant difference of NED markers (CgA or NSE variation (P = 0.243) between at baseline and after the failure of AA treatment. Compared with the CgA elevation group in the first 6 months of AA treatment and baseline supranormal CgA group, the CgA decline group, and baseline normal CgA group has a much longer median PSA PFS (14.34 vs 10.00 months, P < 0.001, and 14.23 vs 10.30 months, P = 0.02) and rPFS, respectively (18.33 vs 11.37 months, P < 0.001, and 17.10 vs 12.07 months, P = 0.03). In logistic univariate analysis, AA treatment and its duration were not independent factors influencing NED. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesized that AA might not significantly lead to progression of NED of mCRPC in general. Furthermore, we found there was heterogeneity in changes of NED markers in different mCRPC patients during AA treatment. Serial CgA and NSE evaluation might help clinicians guide clinical treatment of mCRPC patients.

Bioequivalence, food effect and comparative pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105, a novel granule formulation of abiraterone acetate, to Zytiga in healthy male subjects.

PURPOSE: SUVN-1105 is a novel formulation of abiraterone acetate which was developed to demonstrate improved bioavailability, compared to Zytiga and Yonsa, and to reduce the dose and eliminate the food effect. A Phase 1 study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence, food effect, and comparative pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105 to Zytiga in healthy male subjects. METHODS: The study comprised of 2 segments. Segment 1 was a single-center, 4-period crossover, open-label, fixed treatment sequence, single-dose study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105 (N = 12 subjects per period). Segment 2 was a single-center, open-label, single-dose, randomized, 4-period, 4-treatment, 4-sequence crossover study to evaluate bioequivalence and comparative pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105 against Zytiga (N = 44) under overnight fasted, modified fasted, and fed conditions. RESULTS: Abiraterone exposures appeared to increase proportionately with SUVN-1105 dose (200 mg vs. 250 mg) in Segment 1. In Segment 2, abiraterone exposures of 250 mg SUVN-1105 in the fasted or fed conditions were higher than those of Zytiga 1000 mg in the overnight fasted conditions. Abiraterone exposures of 250 mg SUVN-1105 decreased in the fed conditions (64% and 29% decrease in Cmax and AUC, respectively) compared to overnight fasted conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The abiraterone exposures of 250 mg SUVN-1105 in the fasted or fed conditions fall within the abiraterone exposures of 1000 mg Zytiga in fasted and modified fasted conditions. Single doses of SUVN-1105 were safe and well-tolerated in healthy males both in the fasted and fed conditions.

Demonstrating Bioequivalence for Two Dose Strengths of Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate Dual-Action Tablets Versus Single Agents: Utility of Clinical Study Data Supplemented with Modeling and Simulation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The combination of niraparib and abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone is under investigation for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Regular-strength (RS) and lower-strength (LS) dual-action tablets (DATs), comprising niraparib 100 mg/AA 500 mg and niraparib 50 mg/AA 500 mg, respectively, were developed to reduce pill burden and improve patient experience. A bioequivalence (BE)/bioavailability (BA) study was conducted under modified fasting conditions in patients with mCRPC to support approval of the DATs. METHODS: This open-label randomized BA/BE study (NCT04577833) was conducted at 14 sites in the USA and Europe. The study had a sequential design, including a 21-day screening phase, a pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment phase comprising three periods [namely (1) single-dose with up to 1-week run-in, (2) daily dose on days 1-11, and (3) daily dose on days 12-22], an extension where both niraparib and AA as single-agent combination (SAC; reference) or AA alone was continued from day 23 until discontinuation, and a 30-day follow-up phase. Patients were randomly assigned in a parallel-group design (four-sequence randomization) to receive a single oral dose of niraparib 100 mg/AA 1000 mg as a LS-DAT or SAC in period 1, and patients continued as randomized into a two-way crossover design during periods 2 and 3 where they received niraparib 200 mg/AA 1000 mg once daily as a RS-DAT or SAC. The design was powered on the basis of crossover assessment of RS-DAT versus SAC. During repeated dosing (periods 2 and 3, and extension phase), all patients also received prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg twice daily. Plasma samples were collected for measurement of niraparib and abiraterone plasma concentrations. Statistical assessment of the RS-DAT and LS-DAT versus SAC was performed on log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters data from periods 2 and 3 (crossover) and from period 1 (parallel), respectively. Additional paired analyses and model-based bioequivalence assessments were conducted to evaluate the similarity between the LS-DAT and SAC. RESULTS: For the RS-DAT versus SAC, the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of geometric mean ratios (GMR) for maximum concentration at a steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-24 h at a steady state (AUC 0-24h,ss) were respectively 99.18-106.12% and 97.91-104.31% for niraparib and 87.59-106.69 and 86.91-100.23% for abiraterone. For the LS-DAT vs SAC, the 90% CI of GMR for AUC0-72h of niraparib was 80.31-101.12% in primary analysis, the 90% CI of GMR for Cmax,ss and AUC 0-24h,ss of abiraterone was 85.41-118.34% and 86.51-121.64% respectively, and 96.4% of simulated LS-DAT versus SAC BE trials met the BE criteria for both niraparib and abiraterone. CONCLUSIONS: The RS-DAT met BE criteria (range 80%-125%) versus SAC based on 90% CI of GMR for Cmax,ss and AUC 0-24h,ss. The LS-DAT was considered BE to SAC on the basis of the niraparib component meeting the BE criteria in the primary analysis for AUC 0-72h; abiraterone meeting the BE criteria in additional paired analyses based on Cmax,ss and AUC 0-24h,ss; and the percentage of simulated LS-DAT versus SAC BE trials meeting the BE criteria for both. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04577833.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Abiraterone Acetate Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: An Open, Randomized, Single-Dose, Three-Period, Three-Sequence Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abiraterone acetate tablet is an inhibitor of androgen synthesis, primarily for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study evaluated the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of the reference and test formulations of abiraterone acetate tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers. METHODS: A single-center, open, single-dose, randomized, three-period, three-sequence, semi-repeat (only repeated reference formulations), and reference formulation-corrected fasting reference-scaled average bioequivalence test was conducted in 36 healthy volunteers included in this study. Volunteers were randomly assigned to one of three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. There was a minimum 7-day washout period between each dose. Blood samples were collected at prescribed time intervals, the plasma concentration of abiraterone acetate tablets was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Under fasting conditions, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 27.02 ± 14.21 ng/mL, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t (AUCt) was 125.30 ± 82.41 h·ng/mL, and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) was 133.70 ± 83.99 h·ng/mL. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of AUCt and AUC∞ were in the range of 0.8000-1.2500, and the coefficient of variation (CVWR) of Cmax was more than 30%. The Critbound result was - 0.0522, and the GMR was between 0.8000 and 1.2500. CONCLUSION: Both test and reference formulations of abiraterone acetate tablets were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04863105, registered 26 April 2021-retrospectively registered ( https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S000ARAA&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00050YQ&ts=2&cx=-vbtjri.

Open-Label, Phase I, Pharmacokinetic Studies in Healthy Chinese Subjects to Evaluate the Bioequivalence and Food Effect of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate Tablets.

PURPOSE: Abiraterone acetate tablets (I)(N-AbA) is a novel tablet co-formulated with the absorption enhancer sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC). This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, safety, and food effects of N-AbA with the reference ZYTIGA® (R-AbA) in healthy Chinese male subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in three parts. Part I was an open, dose-escalation trial conducted in 16 Chinese healthy males; Part II was a randomized, open-label, 2 × 4 crossover, single-dose bioequivalence trial conducted in 36 subjects; Part III was a randomized, 3 × 3 crossover trial conducted on 24 volunteers to investigate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of N-AbA. RESULTS: The exposure (AUC0-∞) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of abiraterone and excipient SNAC were linear in the range of 75-450 mg dose. The bioavailability of N-AbA 300 mg was equivalent to that of R-AbA 1000 mg. The drug exposure of prednisone and prednisolone was not affected by SNAC co-administration. The Cmax of orally administered abiraterone as R-AbA in a modified fed state was 5.9 times and AUC0-∞ was 4.3 times, respectively, higher than those in of orally administered abiraterone as N-AbA in a high-fat diet. The Cmax and AUC0-∞ of orally administered abiraterone as N-AbA on a high-fat diet were 2.2 times and 2 times, respectively, higher than those on a fasting state. All adverse events reported in the three parts of the study were grade 1 or 2, and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: These three Phase I trials showed that N-AbA and excipient SNAC had excellent linear pharmacokinetic characteristics. A single dose of N-AbA 300 mg was bioequivalent to R-AbA 1000 mg in healthy subjects under fasting conditions. Meanwhile, SNAC had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of prednisone and prednisolone. The effect of food on N-AbA was significantly lower than that on R-AbA.

Increasing the efficacy of abiraterone - from pharmacokinetics, through therapeutic drug monitoring to overcoming food effects with innovative pharmaceutical products.

Current guidelines suggest radiotherapy as a first-line treatment for prostate cancer, along with prostatectomy, and androgen deprivation therapy. Abiraterone is a first-in-class medicinal product recommended in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that targets androgen receptors and inhibits systemic synthesis. However, successful therapy with this drug may pose some challenges. It has to be administered as an inactive prodrug - abiraterone acetate. It is also dissolved and absorbed poorly with large interindividual variability and exhibits considerable food effects. Additionally, the recommended daily dose of the drug is high (1000 mg abiraterone acetate), and the cost of the therapy is burdensome. The following review focuses on the strategies to optimize therapy with abiraterone acetate. First, it summarizes current findings on abiraterone pharmacokinetics and accentuates the need for utilizing therapeutic monitoring in clinical practice. Next, it extensively describes the options for improving the low bioavailability of the drug. The two major approaches are the utilization of the positive food effect to increase the exposure and development of supergenerics. The review emphasizes how different formulation approaches lead to increased solubility and impact the outcomes of pre-clinical and clinical trials. The review concludes with a discussion on possible future directions that may lead to the increase of the therapeutic efficacy of abiraterone.

Arylacetamide deacetylase as a determinant of the hydrolysis and activation of abiraterone acetate in mice and humans.

AIM: Abiraterone acetate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is an acetylated prodrug to be hydrolyzed to abiraterone. Abiraterone acetate is known to be hydrolyzed by pancreatic cholesterol esterase secreted into the intestinal lumen. This study aimed to investigate the possibility that arylacetamide deacetylase (AADAC) expressed in enterocytes contributes to the hydrolysis of abiraterone acetate based on its substrate preference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abiraterone acetate hydrolase activity was measured using human intestinal (HIM) and liver microsomes (HLM) as well as recombinant AADAC. Correlation analysis between activity and AADAC expression was performed in 14 individual HIMs. The in vivo pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate was examined using wild-type and Aadac knockout mice administered abiraterone acetate with or without orlistat, a pancreatic cholesterol esterase inhibitor. KEY FINDINGS: Recombinant AADAC showed abiraterone acetate hydrolase activity with similar Km value to HIM and HLM. The positive correlation between activity and AADAC levels in individual HIMs supported the responsibility of AADAC for abiraterone acetate hydrolysis. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of abiraterone after oral administration of abiraterone acetate in Aadac knockout mice was 38% lower than that in wild-type mice. The involvement of pancreatic cholesterol esterase in abiraterone formation was revealed by the decreased AUC of abiraterone by coadministration of orlistat. Orlistat potently inhibited AADAC, implying its potential as a perpetrator of drug-drug interactions. SIGNIFICANCE: AADAC is responsible for the hydrolysis of abiraterone acetate in the intestine and liver, suggesting that concomitant use of abiraterone acetate and drugs potently inhibiting AADAC should be avoided.

Enhancement of abiraterone acetate oral bioavailability by supersaturated-silica lipid hybrids.

Abiraterone acetate (AbA) has an oral bioavailability of <10% due to its poor water solubility. Here we investigate the performance of silica-lipid hybrids (SLH) and supersaturated SLH (super-SLH) in improving oral bioavailability of AbA. Specifically, we investigate the influence of lipid type and AbA saturation level of the equilibrium solubility in the lipid (Seq), and explore in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC). An oral pharmacokinetic study was conducted in fasted Sprague-Dawley rats. Suspensions of the formulations were administered via oral gavage at an AbA dose of 25 mg/kg. Plasma samples were collected and analyzed for drug content. SLH with a saturation level of 90% Seq enhanced the oral bioavailability of unformulated AbA by 31-fold, and super-SLH with saturation levels of 150, 200 and 250% Seq, enhanced the bioavailability by 11, 10 and 7-fold, respectively. In comparison with the commercial product Zytiga, SLH (90% Seq) increased the oral bioavailability 1.43-fold whereas super-SLH showed no improvement. A reasonable IVIVC existed between the performance of unformulated AbA, SLH and super-SLH, in the in vitro lipolysis and in vivo oral pharmacokinetic studies. SLH and super-SLH significantly enhanced the oral bioavailability of AbA. Additionally, supersaturation of SLH improved drug loading but did not correlate with enhanced AbA bioavailability.

Oral formulation strategies to improve the bioavailability and mitigate the food effect of abiraterone acetate.

Abiraterone acetate, marketed as Zytiga®, is an antiandrogen medication used in the treatment of prostate cancer. Abiraterone acetate is a BCS Class IV compound associated with several oral delivery challenges. Its low solubility and high lipophilicity lead to poor oral bioavailability (<10%) and a dramatic positive food effect (5-10-fold). Hence, a large dose of abiraterone acetate (1000 mg per day) is prescribed to patients who must fast for at least 1 h before and 2 h after administration. The recent expiry of Zytiga®s' patent has led to the emergence of publications describing improved oral formulation strategies for abiraterone acetate. This review aims to discuss the characteristics of abiraterone acetate that lead to its unfavorable oral delivery, examine the oral formulation strategies that have been applied, and to describe potential alternative oral formulation strategies that have been used for other BCS Class IV drugs, to determine the most valuable strategies to develop novel and improved alternatives to the current commercial product. Specific emphasis of this review is placed on enabling oral formulation strategies that can improve solubilization and bioavailability, reduce the clinical dose and remove the pharmaceutical food effect to ultimately provide prostate cancer patients with a more efficient formulation with greater patient compliance.

Bioavailability Enhancement and Food Effect Elimination of Abiraterone Acetate by Encapsulation in Surfactant-Enriched Oil Marbles.

Abiraterone acetate has limited bioavailability in the fasted state and exhibits a strong positive food effect. We present a novel formulation concept based on the so-called oil marbles (OMs) and show by in vitro and in vivo experiments that the food effect can be suppressed. OMs are spherical particles with a core-shell structure, formed by coating oil-based droplets that contain the dissolved drug by a layer of powder that prevents the cores from sticking and coalescence. OMs prepared in this work contained abiraterone acetate in the amorphous form and showed enhanced dissolution properties during in vitro experiments when compared with originally marketed formulation of abiraterone acetate (Zytiga®). Based on in vitro comparison of OMs containing different oil/surfactant combinations, the most promising formulation was chosen for in vivo studies. To ensure relevance, it was verified that the food effect previously reported for Zytiga® in humans was translated into the rat animal model. The bioavailability of abiraterone acetate formulated in OMs in the fasted state was then found to be enhanced by a factor of 2.7 in terms of AUC and by a factor of 4.0 in terms of Cmax. Crucially, the food effect reported in the literature for other abiraterone acetate formulations was successfully eliminated and OMs showed comparable extent of bioavailability in a fed-fasted study. Oil marbles therefore seem to be a promising formulation concept not only for abiraterone acetate but potentially also for other poorly soluble drugs that reveal a positive food effect.

Concomitant intake of abiraterone acetate and food to increase pharmacokinetic exposure: real life data from a therapeutic drug monitoring programme.

AIM: Abiraterone acetate is approved for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. At the currently used fixed dose of 1000 mg once daily in modified fasting state, 40% of patients do not reach the efficacy threshold of a minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) ≥ 8.4 ng/mL and are thereby at risk of decreased treatment efficacy. This study aims to evaluate whether pharmacokinetically (PK) guided abiraterone acetate dosing with a food intervention is feasible and results in an increased percentage of patients with concentrations above the target. METHODS: Patients starting regular treatment with abiraterone acetate in modified fasting state were included. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed 4, 8 and 12 weeks after start of treatment and every 12 weeks thereafter. In case of Cmin < 8.4 ng/mL and acceptable toxicity, a PK-guided intervention was recommended. The first step was concomitant intake of abiraterone acetate with a light meal or a snack. RESULTS: In total, 32 evaluable patients were included, of which 20 patients (63%) had a Cmin < 8.4 ng/mL at a certain time point during treatment. These patients were recommended to take abiraterone acetate concomitantly with food, after which Cmin increased from 6.9 ng/mL to 27 ng/mL (p < 0.001) without additional toxicities. This intervention led to adequate exposure in 28 patients (87.5%). CONCLUSION: Therapeutic drug monitoring of abiraterone was applied in clinical practice and proved to be feasible. Concomitant intake with food resulted in a significant increase in Cmin and offers a cost-neutral opportunity to optimise exposure in patients with low Cmin.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antitumor Effect of Apalutamide with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase Ib Study.

PURPOSE: Apalutamide is a next-generation androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor approved for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity of apalutamide combined with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA-P) in patients with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicenter, open-label, phase Ib drug-drug interaction study conducted in 57 patients with mCRPC treated with 1,000 mg abiraterone acetate plus 10 mg prednisone daily beginning on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) and 240 mg apalutamide daily starting on C1D8 in 28-day cycles. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected on C1D7 and C2D8. RESULTS: Systemic exposure to abiraterone, prednisone, and prednisolone decreased 14%, 61%, and 42%, respectively, when apalutamide was coadministered with AA-P. No increase in mineralocorticoid excess-related adverse events was observed. Patients without prior exposure to AR signaling inhibitors had longer median treatment duration and greater mean decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) from baseline compared with those who had received prior therapy. Confirmed PSA reductions of ≥50% from baseline at any time were observed in 80% (12/15) of AR signaling inhibitor-naïve patients and 14% (6/42) of AR signaling inhibitor-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with apalutamide plus AA-P was well tolerated and showed evidence of antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC, including those with disease progression on AR signaling inhibitors. No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between abiraterone and apalutamide; however, apalutamide decreased exposure to prednisone. These data support development of 1,000 mg abiraterone acetate plus 10 mg prednisone daily with 240 mg apalutamide daily in patients with mCRPC.

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics of Abiraterone Acetate and Abiraterone Following Single-Dose Administration of Abiraterone Acetate to Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Following oral administration of abiraterone acetate, the parent compound abiraterone acetate is rapidly metabolized to abiraterone. To our knowledge, bioanalytical methods to date have not been able to detect the parent compound in human plasma, and bioassay was only performed on the metabolite. A highly sensitive bioanalytical method was developed and validated to measure plasma concentrations of the parent compound. In this study, both analytes were assayed and used to evaluate the full pharmacokinetic profile of abiraterone acetate tablets. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-dose, one-period, one-treatment, pharmacokinetic study performed in 18 healthy subjects. Each subject was administered four tablets (corresponding to a total dose of 1000 mg) of abiraterone acetate. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected up to 60 h post-dose. Subjects' plasma concentrations for abiraterone acetate were assayed using highly sensitive validated bioanalytical methods with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 0.5 pg/ml for abiraterone acetate and 0.1 ng/ml for abiraterone. Safety assessments were performed throughout the study. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic results for abiraterone acetate showed a mean for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 54.67 ± 68.30 pg/ml, and a median time to maximum concentrations (tmax) of 5.53 h (range 2.67-35.00 h). The means for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 h to infinity (AUCinf) and AUC from time zero h to the time of the last measurable abiraterone acetate concentrations (AUCt) were 386.13 ± 266.80 pg·h/ml and 460.07 ± 378.78 pg·h/ml, respectively. The apparent elimination half-life (t1/2) showed a mean of 8.98 ± 3.92 h. None of the adverse events that affected three subjects (16.7%) were related to the study drug. CONCLUSION: The ability to detect the low plasma abiraterone acetate concentrations, in addition to abiraterone, resulted in a complete characterization of the pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate that was not possible with other analytical methods that only measured the metabolite. The development of new bioanalytical methods such as these will allow for a more thorough understanding of the pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate, and this, in turn, can have an impact on both future examinations into abiraterone acetate pharmacokinetic behaviour and the evaluation of its generic formulations.

A prospective phase I multicentre randomized cross-over pharmacokinetic study to determine the effect of food on abiraterone pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: Abiraterone acetate is used at a fixed oral dose of 1000 mg once daily (OD) taken fasted. By administering abiraterone acetate with food, a reduced dose can potentially be given while maintaining equivalent abiraterone exposure. Moreover, administering abiraterone acetate with a breakfast is considered more patient friendly. The aim of this study was to establish the bio-equivalent lower dose of abiraterone when taken with a continental breakfast (CB) compared to the standard intake of 1000 mg OD fasted. METHODS: In this phase I, randomized cross-over, multi-center study, abiraterone pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were treated for 14 days with 1000 mg abiraterone acetate taken fasted, followed by 14 days of treatment with 500 mg taken with a CB. RESULTS: 14 patients were enrolled into the study, of whom 12 were eligible for PK analysis. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) (fed/fasted) was 0.88 (90% CI 0.73-1.07) for area-under-the-curve (AUC0-24h), 1.03 (90% CI 0.79-1.34) for Cmax and 0.81 (90% CI 0.60-1.10) for Ctrough, respectively. High inter-patient variability (> 50%) was found for all PK parameters under both intake conditions. Patients seemed to be slightly more satisfied about the intake of 500 mg abiraterone acetate when taken with a CB compared to 1000 mg fasted. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a bioequivalent lower dose of abiraterone taken with food could not be established in our study. Although based on the absence of a exposure-toxicity relationship, the strict bioequivalence margins as defined by the FDA guidelines could be applied more flexible for abiraterone. Information on the effect of food on abiraterone pharmacokinetics as presented in our study can be used for patients with difficulties taken their medication fasted.