Antagonism or synergism? Responses of Hydrocharis dubia (Bl.) Backer to linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, naphthalene and their joint exposure.

The presence of surfactants may affect the bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. A hydroponic experiment was conducted to investigate the response of Hydrocharis dubia (Bl.) Backer to different concentrations of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), naphthalene (NAP) and their mixture (0.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg/L) for 14 days and 28 days. The results showed that LAS had a greater toxic effect on H. dubia growth than NAP at treatment concentrations of 0.5-20 mg/L. The combined effect of LAS and NAP was damaging to H. dubia at concentrations of LAS + NAP ≥5 + 5 mg/L. When LAS + NAP ≥10 + 10 mg/L, the underground parts of H. dubia suffered more significant damage than the aboveground parts. Under the treatments with LAS, NAP and their mixture, H. dubia experienced oxidative stress. Soluble proteins and antioxidant enzymes were the main substances protecting H. dubia from LAS stress, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) were the main protective enzymes. When exposed to NAP, H. dubia growth was stimulated and promoted at the same time. In the short-term treatment (14 d), catalase (CAT) activity was sensitive to NAP stimulation, and soluble proteins and SOD were the main protective substances produced. Soluble sugars, SOD and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) played important protective roles during the longer exposure time (28 d). The physiological response of H. dubia exposed to the combined toxicants was weaker than the response to exposure to individual toxicants. The responses of SOD and CAT activity were positive in the short term (14 d), and these were the main protective enzymes. As the exposure time increased (28 d), the plant antioxidant system responded negatively.

Phycoerythrin Peptide from Pyropia yezoensis Alleviates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Caused by Perfluorooctane Sulfonate-Induced Calcium Dysregulation.

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), a stable fluorosurfactant, causes endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in the brain. This study was designed to investigate whether a phycoerythrin-derived peptide of Pyropia yezoensis (PYP) reduces PFOS-induced ER stress associated with calcium dysregulation. The protective effects of PYP were determined by cell viability, immunoblotting for ER stress response protein glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and calcium-dependent protein kinases in rat frontal cortical neurons. PFOS-induced decrease in cell viability was attenuated by PYP pretreatment (1 µg/mL) for 24 h, which was downregulated by inhibiting tropomyosin-receptor kinase B (TrkB). PYP pretreatment downregulated the increase in intracellular calcium levels and phosphorylation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and c-Jun N-terminal kinase which are associated with a PFOS-induced increase in GRP78. The PFOS-induced increase in GRP78 was downregulated via activation of TrkB receptor-linked extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) by PYP pretreatment. Moreover, PYP microinjections (1 µg/kg, 0.54 nmol) attenuated the GRP78 expression in rat prefrontal cortex caused by PFOS (10 mg/kg) exposure for 2 weeks. These findings demonstrate that PYP enhances frontal cortical neuron viability via activation of TrkB receptor-ERK1/2 signaling and attenuation of ER stress in rat prefrontal cortex against PFOS exposure, suggesting that PYP might prevent neuronal dysfunctions caused by PFOS-induced ER stress.

Perfluorinated chemicals, PFOS and PFOA, enhance the estrogenic effects of 17ß-estradiol in T47D human breast cancer cells.

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are the two most popular surfactants among perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), with a wide range of uses. Growing evidence suggests that PFCs have the potential to interfere with estrogen homeostasis, posing a risk of endocrine-disrupting effects. This in vitro study aimed to investigate the estrogenic effect of these compounds on T47D hormone-dependent breast cancer cells. PFOS and PFOA (10(-12) to 10(-4) M) were not able to induce estrogen response element (ERE) activation in the ERE luciferase reporter assay. The ERE activation was induced when the cells were co-incubated with PFOS (10(-10) to 10(-7) M) or PFOA (10(-9) to 10(-7) M) and 1 nM of 17ß-estradiol (E2). PFOS and PFOA did not modulate the expression of estrogen-responsive genes, including progesterone (PR) and trefoil factor (pS2), but these compounds enhanced the effect of E2-induced pS2 gene expression. Neither PFOS nor PFOA affected T47D cell viability at any of the tested concentrations. In contrast, co-exposure with PFOS or PFOA and E2 resulted in an increase of E2-induced cell viability, but no effect was found with 10 ng ml(-1) EGF co-exposure. Both compounds also intensified E2-dependent growth in the proliferation assay. ERK1/2 phosphorylation was increased by co-exposure with PFOS or PFOA and E2, but not with EGF. Collectively, this study shows that PFOS and PFOA did not possess estrogenic activity, but they enhanced the effects of E2 on estrogen-responsive gene expression, ERK1/2 activation and the growth of the hormone-deprived T47D cells. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Perfluorooctane sulfonate mediates secretion of IL-1ß through PI3K/AKT NF-кB pathway in astrocytes.

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) is a persistent and bioaccumulative compound that has been widely used in various fields of life and industrial productions, because of its special chemical and physical properties. Numerous studies have indicated significant neurotoxic effect of PFOS, especially on neurons and microglia. However, the influence of PFOS on astrocyte physiology remains unclear. In this study, we showed that PFOS triggered reactive astrocytosis in time- and dose-dependent manners. The low-doses of PFOS increased the cell number and the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a well-known hallmark of reactive astrocytes, in C6 astrocyte cells. ELISA and RT-PCR analysis showed that PFOS promoted the expression and secretion of Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) in dose- and time-dependent manners. Furthermore, PFOS exposure could induce the phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα, and the translocation of NF-κB p65 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in C6 glioma cell line. Thus, the NF-кB signaling pathway can be activated after PFOS exposure. In addition, pretreatment with AKT inhibitor LY294002 could obviously attenuate PFOS-induced NF-κB activation and IL-1ß secretion. Taken together, these results indicated that PFOS could facilitate reactive astrocytosis and the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines through AKT-dependent NF-κB signaling pathway.

Oxidative stress from diverse developmental neurotoxicants: antioxidants protect against lipid peroxidation without preventing cell loss.

Oxidative stress has been hypothesized to provide a mechanism by which apparently unrelated chemicals can nevertheless produce similar developmental neurotoxic outcomes. We used differentiating PC12 cells to compare the effects of agents from four different classes and then to evaluate antioxidant amelioration: fipronil, perfluorooctanesulfonamide (PFOSA), dieldrin and chlorpyrifos. The rank order for lipid peroxidation corresponded to the ability to evoke cell loss: fipronil>PFOSA>dieldrin>chlorpyrifos. The same sequence was found for an index of cell enlargement (protein/DNA ratio) but the effects on neurite outgrowth (membrane/total protein) diverged, with fipronil producing a decrease and PFOSA an increase. Cotreatment with antioxidants reduced (ascorbate) or eliminated (Vitamin E) lipid peroxidation caused by each of the agents but failed to protect against cell loss, with the sole exception of chlorpyrifos, for which we earlier showed partial protection by Vitamin E; addition of higher NGF concentrations protected neither against oxidative stress nor cell loss. Despite the failure to prevent cell loss, ascorbate protected the cells from the effects of PFOSA on neuritic outgrowth; NGF, and to a lesser extent, ascorbate, offset the effects of fipronil on both cell enlargement and neuritogenesis. At the same time, the ameliorant treatments also worsened some of the other toxicant effects. Our results point out the problems in concluding that, just because a neurotoxicant produces oxidative stress, antioxidant therapy will be effective in preventing damage. Instead, additional mechanisms for each agent may provide alternative routes to neurotoxicity, or may be additive or synergistic with oxidative stress.