Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 139
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Eur J Haematol ; 100(3): 241-246, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29171913

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Prospective data on the use of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and its aggressive subtypes, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), are limited. MONITOR-GCSF is a pan-European, multicenter, prospective, observational study aiming to describe treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients receiving biosimilar filgrastim in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN). METHODS: This analysis describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for 245 patients with stage 3 or 4 DLBCL receiving ≤6 chemotherapy cycles as part of MONITOR-GCSF study, including patients aged ≥65 years and ≥70 years. Outcomes of interest included the incidence of CIN and FN, antibiotic prophylaxis, biosimilar filgrastim prophylaxis, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: MONITOR-GCSF included 245 patients with DLBCL. Of these patients, 87 (35.5%) experienced one or more CIN (any grade) episode and 24 (9.8%) experienced FN (any grade). The most frequent AE reported was bone pain (n = 7, 2.9%), followed by arthralgia (n = 2, 0.8%) and back pain (n = 2, 0.8%). CONCLUSION: In real-life practice, biosimilar filgrastim demonstrated clinical effectiveness and safety in patients with DLBCL. The large percentage of patients aged ≥65 years adds to the evidence on how to best treat older patients with DLBCL receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Febrile Neutropenia/prevention & control , Filgrastim/therapeutic use , Hematologic Agents/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Arthralgia/chemically induced , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/prevention & control , Back Pain/chemically induced , Back Pain/physiopathology , Back Pain/prevention & control , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Bone and Bones/physiopathology , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Febrile Neutropenia/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Myeloablative Agonists/administration & dosage , Myeloablative Agonists/adverse effects , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Safety , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Lancet Oncol ; 17(2): 153-163, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26774508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide is an oral androgen-receptor inhibitor that has been shown to improve survival in two placebo-controlled phase 3 trials, and is approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The objective of the TERRAIN study was to compare the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide with bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: TERRAIN was a double-blind, randomised phase 2 study, that recruited asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic men with prostate cancer progression on androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) from academic, community, and private health-care provision sites across North America and Europe. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system to receive enzalutamide 160 mg/day or bicalutamide 50 mg/day, both taken orally, in addition to ADT, until disease progression. Patients were stratified by a permutated block method (block size of four), by whether bilateral orchiectomy or receipt of luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist therapy started before or after the diagnosis of metastases, and by study site. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed in all randomised patients. Safety outcomes were analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The open-label period of the trial is in progress, wherein patients still on treatment at the end of the double-blind treatment period were offered open-label enzalutamide at the discretion of the patient and study investigator. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01288911. FINDINGS: Between March 22, 2011, and July 11, 2013, 375 patients were randomly assigned, 184 to enzalutamide and 191 to bicalutamide. 126 (68%) and 168 (88%) patients, respectively, discontinued their assigned treatment before study end, mainly due to progressive disease. Median follow-up time was 20·0 months (IQR 15·0-25·6) in the enzalutamide group and 16·7 months (10·2-21·9) in the bicalutamide group. Patients in the enzalutamide group had significantly improved median progression-free survival (15·7 months [95% CI 11·5-19·4]) compared with patients in the bicalutamide group (5·8 months [4·8-8·1]; hazard ratio 0·44 [95% CI 0·34-0·57]; p<0·0001). Of the most common adverse events, those occurring more frequently with enzalutamide than with bicalutamide were fatigue (51 [28%] of 183 patients in the enzalutamide group vs 38 [20%] of 189 in the bicalutamide group), back pain (35 [19%] vs 34 [18%]), and hot flush (27 [15%] vs 21 [11%]); those occurring more frequently with bicalutamide were nausea (26 [14%] vs 33 [17%]), constipation (23 [13%] vs 25 [13%]), and arthralgia (18 [10%] vs 30 [16%]). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the enzalutamide or bicalutamide treatment groups, respectively, were hypertension (13 [7%] vs eight [4%]), hydronephrosis (three [2%] vs seven [4%]), back pain (five [3%] vs three [2%]), pathological fracture (five [3%] vs two [1%]), dyspnoea (four [2%] vs one [1%]), bone pain (one [1%] vs four [2%]), congestive cardiac failure (four [2%] vs two [1%]), myocardial infarction (five [3%] vs none), and anaemia (four [2%] vs none]). Serious adverse events were reported by 57 (31%) of 183 patients and 44 (23%) of 189 patients in the enzalutamide and bicalutamide groups, respectively. One of the nine deaths in the enzalutamide group was thought to be possibly related to treatment (due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome) compared with none of the three deaths in the bicalutamide group. INTERPRETATION: The data from the TERRAIN trial support the use of enzalutamide rather than bicalutamide in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. FUNDING: Astellas Pharma, Inc and Medivation, Inc.


Subject(s)
Anilides/therapeutic use , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Tosyl Compounds/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia/chemically induced , Anilides/adverse effects , Arthralgia/chemically induced , Back Pain/chemically induced , Benzamides , Constipation/chemically induced , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Double-Blind Method , Dyspnea/chemically induced , Fatigue/chemically induced , Fractures, Spontaneous/chemically induced , Heart Failure/chemically induced , Hot Flashes/chemically induced , Humans , Hydronephrosis/chemically induced , Hypertension/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/chemically induced , Nausea/chemically induced , Nitriles/adverse effects , Patient Dropouts , Phenylthiohydantoin/adverse effects , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Tosyl Compounds/adverse effects
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(1): 267-273, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26024743

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Lipegfilgrastim is a once-per-cycle, fixed-dose, glycoPEGylated recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) recently approved in Europe to reduce the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Bone pain-related (BPR) adverse events are commonly associated with G-CSF therapy. This post hoc analysis examined BPR treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in two comparative studies of lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was conducted using integrated data from two double-blind randomized studies in patients with breast cancer receiving docetaxel and doxorubicin and treated prophylactically with subcutaneous lipegfilgrastim 6 mg or pegfilgrastim 6 mg once per cycle. BPR TEAEs were defined as arthralgia, back pain, bone pain, musculoskeletal chest pain, musculoskeletal discomfort, musculoskeletal pain, myalgia, neck pain, noncardiac chest pain, and pain in extremity. Relationship of BPR TEAEs to study treatment or chemotherapy was also reported by the investigators. RESULTS: The analysis included 306 patients (lipegfilgrastim: n = 151; pegfilgrastim: n = 155). The proportion of patients experiencing BPR TEAEs was similar with lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim (25.2 vs 21.9%, respectively), as was the proportion of patients experiencing BPR treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions (TEADRs) (18.5 vs 16.8%, respectively). No BPR TEADRs were serious, and none led to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsevere BPR TEAEs and TEADRs were observed in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and G-CSF; rates of BPR events were similar between lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim. The similar BPR safety profile of lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim provides support for use in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Musculoskeletal Pain/chemically induced , Adult , Aged , Arthralgia/chemically induced , Back Pain/chemically induced , Breast Neoplasms, Male/drug therapy , Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia/etiology , Docetaxel , Double-Blind Method , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Filgrastim , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/adverse effects , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Middle Aged , Myalgia/chemically induced , Polyethylene Glycols , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Taxoids/administration & dosage
4.
Reprod Health ; 13: 42, 2016 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27091008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The copper intrauterine device (IUD) is under-utilised in South Africa, where injectable progestin contraception (IPC) dominates contraception usage. There is a lack of robust comparative data on these contraceptive options to inform policy, programs, clinical counseling, and women's choices. METHODS: Within the context of a South African program to increase women's access to the IUD, we conducted a pragmatic, open-label, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial of the IUD versus IPC at two South African hospitals. The target sample size was 7,000 women and the randomisation ratio was 1:1. The random sequence was computer-generated and group allocation was concealed in sealed, opaque, consecutively-numbered envelopes. Counselled, consenting women attending termination of pregnancy services were randomly assigned to IUD or IPC immediately post-termination. Condoms were promoted for the prevention of sexually-transmitted infections. The primary outcome was pregnancy; secondary outcomes were discontinuation, side-effects, and HIV acquisition and disease progression. Pregnancy and discontinuation outcomes are reported here. RESULTS: The trial closed early with 2,493 participants randomised (IUD = 1,247, IPC = 1,246), due to international concerns regarding a possible association between IPC and HIV acquisition. Median follow-up was 20 months; 982 and 1000 participants were followed up in the IUD and IPC groups, respectively. Baseline group characteristics were comparable. Pregnancy occurred significantly less frequently among women allocated to the IUD than IPC: 56/971 (5.8%) versus 83/992 (8.4%), respectively; risk ratio (RR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.96; P = 0.025. There were more protocol violations in the IUD group; however, discontinuation rates were similar between IUD and IPC groups (141/855 [16.5%] and 143/974 [14.7%], respectively). Women in the IUD group were more likely to discontinue contraceptive use due to abdominal pain or backache and non-specific symptoms, and those in the IPC group due to oligo- or amenorhoea and lack of sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: The IUD was significantly more effective in preventing pregnancy than IPC. Efforts to expand contraception options and improve access to the IUD in settings where it is under-utilised are worthwhile. This trial shows that randomising long-acting, reversible contraceptives is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number PACTR201409000880157 (04-09-2014).


Subject(s)
Abortion, Legal , Contraception Behavior , Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects , Intrauterine Devices, Copper/adverse effects , Progestins/adverse effects , Abdominal Pain/chemically induced , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Back Pain/chemically induced , Back Pain/etiology , Contraception Behavior/ethnology , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Drug Implants/adverse effects , Early Termination of Clinical Trials , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lost to Follow-Up , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/adverse effects , Norethindrone/administration & dosage , Norethindrone/adverse effects , Norethindrone/analogs & derivatives , Postoperative Period , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate/ethnology , Progestins/administration & dosage , South Africa/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
Int J Neurosci ; 126(1): 30-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495896

ABSTRACT

Long-term safety of once-daily ropinirole extended/prolonged release (ropinirole XL/PR) was evaluated in subjects with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) in this study, 101468/248. Subjects (n = 419) who completed one of three prior studies evaluating ropinirole XL/PR for the treatment of PD were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, extension study, and were to be followed for up to 73 months. Ropinirole XL/PR was titrated/continued, and adjusted as appropriate during the maintenance phase (maximum 24 mg/d). Levodopa (L-dopa) and other nondopamine agonist PD medications were permitted. Safety outcomes that were investigated included frequency of adverse events (AEs). Subjects' preference regarding once daily versus three times daily study medication regimens was also investigated in a subset of the study population. The median duration of ropinirole XL/PR exposure was 1275 d. Most subjects (87%) reported at least one AE, with the most common (≥ 10%) AEs being, back pain (14%), hallucinations (13%), somnolence (11%) and peripheral edema (11%). Twenty-five percent of subjects discontinued the study prematurely due to an AE during the treatment period. Long-term treatment with ropinirole XL/PR was not associated with any new or unexpected safety concerns in patients with early and advanced PD, and a majority of subjects preferred the once-daily dosing regimen.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Back Pain/chemically induced , Dopamine Agonists/adverse effects , Edema/chemically induced , Fatigue/chemically induced , Hallucinations/chemically induced , Indoles/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Back Pain/epidemiology , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dopamine Agonists/administration & dosage , Dopamine Agonists/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Edema/epidemiology , Fatigue/epidemiology , Female , Hallucinations/epidemiology , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Indoles/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/complications , Patient Preference , Prevalence
6.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 53(7): 561-2, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25907175

ABSTRACT

Amiodarone represents an effective antiarrhythmic drug for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Acute low back and/or epigastric pain has been reported in the medical literature as a rare side effect of amiodarone, but most cases were Europeans, one was Chinese. We present the case of a Japanese patient who experienced acute severe back pain radiating to the whole body a few minutes after intravenous (IV) infusion of amiodarone.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/chemically induced , Amiodarone/adverse effects , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Back Pain/chemically induced , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Amiodarone/administration & dosage , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Back Pain/diagnosis , Drug Substitution , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
7.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 28(11): 1563-5, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24164703

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hoigné syndrome is the most common name given to a condition which has been called in different ways. OBJECTIVE: We want to show that an intralesional injection of prednisolone into the proximal nail fold may produce dorsal pain, dyspnoea and headaches within the 2 min following the injection and to explain the pathophysiology of his condition. METHODS: We studied the different drugs responsible for Hoigné syndrome by comparing the size of the crystals taking into account the diameter of pulmonary capillaries. The drug Company informed us that the size of the microcrystals were 2-4 µm vs. the 8 µm on average of the diameter of the pulmonary capillaries. CONCLUSION: All the symptoms of Hoigné syndrome can be explained, especially the neuropsychiatric and neuropulmonary ones. Therefore, dermatologists should be aware of this phenomenon when they inject steroids in psoriatic nail patients.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/chemically induced , Dyspnea/chemically induced , Headache/chemically induced , Nail Diseases/drug therapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Steroids/administration & dosage , Steroids/adverse effects , Adult , Back Pain/diagnosis , Capillaries/injuries , Comorbidity , Crystallization , Dyspnea/diagnosis , Headache/diagnosis , Humans , Injections, Intralesional , Male , Nail Diseases/epidemiology , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Steroids/therapeutic use , Syndrome
8.
Ginekol Pol ; 85(12): 944-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25669065

ABSTRACT

The first hormonal pill was approved in the 60s of the twentieth century Since that time, oral contraception has been used worldwide by dozens of women due to its high availability as well as relative ease and safety of taking. The main side effects of oral contraception include elevated risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Estrogens increase the probability of VTE development, depending on the dose in medication, and third-generation progestins increase the risk of VTE development more than older-generation progestins. Also, the coexistence of hereditary thrombophilia increases the risk of VTE development in women using oral contraceptives. Other side effects include changes in the carbohydrate and lipid economy Progestins in oral contraceptives decrease HDL cholesterol levels but increase LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol levels. Additionally estrogens are a recognized mitogenic factor for the epithelium of the mammary gland, acting proliferative on the glandular tissue and in the same way influence on the increased risk of breast cancer development. Patients sometimes complain about some subjective side symptoms such as headache, mood changes, nausea, back pain, breast pain and swelling, as well as decreased libido. Some patients discontinue oral contraception due to fear of side effects or temporary ailments before con- sulting their doctor what may result in unintended pregnancy The aim of the following paper was to present most frequent side effects of oral contraception, ways of their moni- toring and diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/adverse effects , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Venous Thromboembolism/chemically induced , Women's Health , Back Pain/chemically induced , Cholesterol, HDL/drug effects , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Estrogens/adverse effects , Ethinyl Estradiol/adverse effects , Female , Headache/chemically induced , Humans , Mastodynia/chemically induced , Nausea/chemically induced , Progestins/adverse effects , Risk Assessment/methods , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control
9.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 57(7): 911-9, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23521140

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Articaine and chloroprocaine have recently gained interest as short-acting spinal anaesthetics. Based on previous work comparing articaine 60 mg with chloroprocaine 40 mg, we hypothesised that articaine 40 mg and chloroprocaine 40 mg would produce similar spinal anaesthesa regarding block onset, maximal spread, and recovery. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind study, adult patients (18-70 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I-III, BMI < 36 kg/m(2) ) scheduled for day-case knee arthroscopy received either articaine 40 mg (20 mg/ml) (group A40, n = 16) or chloroprocaine 40 mg (20 mg/ml) (group C40, n = 18) intrathecally. Telephone interviews were performed on the first and seventh postoperative day to disclose possible side effects, e.g. transient neurological symptoms (TNS). RESULTS: The groups were comparable regarding demographic data, onset and maximal spread of spinal anaesthesia, and duration of surgery. Surgery could be performed successfully under spinal anaesthesia except once in A40 (insufficient block) and once in C40 (prolonged surgery). Complete recovery was significantly slower in A40 vs. C40 for both motor block (105 (94/120) vs. 75 (71/90) min) [P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test (MW-U)] and sensory block [135 (109/176) vs. 105 min (90/124)] (P < 0.02, MW-U), respectively [data are median (25th/75th percentiles)]. One patient from A40 showed mild TNS. CONCLUSION: Both A40 and C40 provided mainly adequate spinal anaesthesia for day-case knee arthroscopy. While onset and maximal spread were comparable, the recovery from motor block was clearly faster with chloroprocaine after equivalent doses of spinal articaine and chloroprocaine.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Arthroscopy , Carticaine/administration & dosage , Knee Joint/surgery , Procaine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Back Pain/chemically induced , Back Pain/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Female , Headache/chemically induced , Headache/prevention & control , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Paresthesia/chemically induced , Paresthesia/prevention & control , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Procaine/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies
10.
Drugs ; 83(3): 249-263, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36692805

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether ibuprofen use, compared with other non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ns-NSAIDs), cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-2i) or paracetamol, increases the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis or hospitalisation. DESIGN: A prevalent user and active comparator cohort study. SETTING: Two US claims databases (Open Claims and PharMetrics Plus) mapped to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model. PARTICIPANTS: Insured patients with a history of osteoarthritis or back pain and receiving ibuprofen, other ns-NSAIDs, COX-2i or paracetamol between 1 November, 2019 and 31 January, 2020 (study enrolment window 1) or between 1 February, 2020 and 31 October, 2020 (study enrolment window 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Large-scale propensity score matching and empirical calibration were used to minimise confounding. Incidence and hazard ratios of COVID-19 diagnosis and hospitalisation according to drug/s use were estimated and pooled in the same study period across data sources using a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Index treatment episode was the primary risk evaluation window, censored at the time of discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 633,562 and 1,063,960 participants were included in periods 1 and 2, respectively, for the ibuprofen versus ns-NSAIDs comparison, 311,669 and 524,470 for ibuprofen versus COX-2i, and 492,002 and 878,598 for ibuprofen versus paracetamol. Meta-analyses of empirically calibrated hazard ratios revealed no significantly differential risk of COVID-19 outcomes in users of ibuprofen versus any of the other studied analgesic classes: hazard ratios were 1.13 (0.96-1.33) for the ibuprofen-ns-NSAIDs comparison, 1.03 (0.83-1.28) for the ibuprofen-COX-2i comparison and 1.13 (0.74-1.73) for ibuprofen-paracetamol comparison on COVID-19 diagnosis in the February 2020-October 2020 window. Similar hazard ratios were found on COVID-19 hospitalisation and across both study periods. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with osteoarthritis or back pain, we found no differential risks of incident COVID-19 diagnosis or COVID-19 hospitalisation for ibuprofen users compared with other ns-NSAIDs, COX-2i or paracetamol. Our findings support regulatory recommendations that NSAIDs, including ibuprofen, should be prescribed as indicated in the same way as before the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for those who rely on ibuprofen or NSAIDs to manage chronic arthritis or musculoskeletal pain symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Testing , Cohort Studies , Pandemics , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Back Pain/diagnosis , Back Pain/drug therapy , Back Pain/chemically induced
11.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(2): 751-60, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21494860

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: Eighty children with nephrotic syndrome underwent lumbar spine densitometry and vertebral morphometry soon after glucocorticoid initiation. We found an inverse relationship between glucocorticoid exposure and spine areal bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score and a low rate of vertebral deformities (8%). INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fractures are an under-recognized complication of childhood glucocorticoid-treated illnesses. Our goal was to study the relationships among glucocorticoid exposure, lumbar spine areal BMD (LS BMD), and vertebral shape in glucocorticoid-treated children with new-onset nephrotic syndrome. METHODS: Lateral thoracolumbar spine radiography and LS BMD were performed in 80 children with nephrotic syndrome (median age 4.4 years; 46 boys) within the first 37 days of glucocorticoid therapy. Genant semiquantitative grading was used as the primary method for vertebral morphometry; the algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) method was used for secondary vertebral deformity analysis. RESULTS: Six of the 78 children with usable radiographs (8%; 95% confidence interval 4 to 16%) manifested a single Genant grade 1 deformity each. All deformities were mild anterior wedging (two at each of T6, T7, and T8). Four of the 78 children (5%; 95% confidence interval 2 to 13%) showed one ABQ sign of fracture each (loss of endplate parallelism; two children at T6 and two at T8). Two of the children with ABQ signs also had a Genant grade 1 deformity in the same vertebral body. None of the children with a Genant or ABQ deformity reported back pain. An inverse relationship was identified between LS BMD Z-score and glucocorticoid exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Although we identified an inverse relationship between steroid exposure and LS BMD soon after glucocorticoid initiation for childhood nephrotic syndrome, there was only a low rate of vertebral deformities. The clinical significance of these findings requires further study.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Nephrotic Syndrome/drug therapy , Spinal Curvatures/chemically induced , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Adolescent , Anthropometry/methods , Back Pain/chemically induced , Bone Density/drug effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Infant , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Male , Nephrotic Syndrome/physiopathology , Spinal Curvatures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Curvatures/physiopathology , Spinal Fractures/chemically induced , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/physiopathology , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging
12.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 162(17-18): 400-3, 2012 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22805763

ABSTRACT

We present a multidisciplinary (anaesthesiology--clinical pharmacy--bioinformatics) analysis of pain as possible adverse drug reaction taking different manifestations of pain, indication groups, relevance to the Austrian drug market and possible mechanistic influence of drugs on development and apprehension of pain into consideration.We designed an overview that shows how transmitters that play a part in nociception and antinociception can be influenced by drugs. This allows conclusions to the dolorigene potential of therapeutics.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Pain/chemically induced , Abdominal Pain/chemically induced , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Austria , Back Pain/chemically induced , Chest Pain/chemically induced , Chest Pain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Headache/chemically induced , Headache/epidemiology , Humans , Pain/epidemiology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced
13.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(10): 4846-4851, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092165

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Isotretinoin has been reported to induce inflammatory back pain (IBP) and sacroiliitis in the patients with acne vulgaris. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of IBP and sacroiliitis in patients receiving isotretinoin treatment compared with oral antibiotics for acne vulgaris. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 201 patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris who received isotretinoin (n = 100) or oral antibiotics (n = 101) were included in the study. All patients were monthly questioned for IBP symptoms during their treatment. Patients described IBP were also evaluated for sacroiliitis by c-reactive protein, sedimentation rate, HLAB27, and sacroiliac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Isotretinoin was discontinued in all patients diagnosed as sacroiliitis, and these patients were reevaluated after 3 months. RESULTS: IBP was observed in 21 (10.4%), and sacroiliitis was detected in 11 (11%) patients on isotretinoin treatment; in oral antibiotic group, we did not observe IBP or sacroiliitis. The incidence of IBP and sacroiliitis differed significantly between the isotretinoin and oral antibiotic groups (p < 0.0001, p = 0.02). Complete regression was observed in the great majority of patients following cessation of isotretinoin. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the largest prospective controlled study that investigated the incidence of sacroiliitis in patients receiving isotretinoin and compared with patients using oral antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris , Dermatologic Agents , Sacroiliitis , Humans , Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Acne Vulgaris/diagnosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Back Pain/chemically induced , Back Pain/diagnosis , Back Pain/drug therapy , Isotretinoin/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Sacroiliitis/chemically induced , Sacroiliitis/diagnostic imaging , Sacroiliitis/epidemiology
14.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 20(2): 177-82, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20015139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In adults, pencil point spinal needles are known to be less traumatic and hence to be superior compared with cutting point needles in respect of postpuncture complications. In children, only a few trials have evaluated the difference in the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) using spinal needles with different tip designs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate and the incidence of PDPH and backache following spinal anesthesia (SA) with the two types of needles currently in use for children. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. The success rate and postpuncture complications of 26G cutting point (Atraucan) spinal needle were compared with 27G pencil point (Pencan) spinal needle in 414 children aged 2-17 years undergoing surgery with SA. RESULTS: Both needles had similar first-attempt success rates: 87% in the cutting point group and 91% in the pencil point group (P = 0.16). Pencil point needles caused less PDPH compared to cutting point needles; 0.4% vs 4.5%, respectively (P = 0.005). Both needles caused similar backache (P = 0.08). No severe neurologic symptom was reported for both needles. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that 27G pencil point spinal needles lead to less PDPH compared to 26G cutting point spinal needles in children.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Spinal/instrumentation , Needles , Post-Dural Puncture Headache/epidemiology , Adjuvants, Anesthesia , Adolescent , Back Pain/chemically induced , Back Pain/epidemiology , Blood Patch, Epidural , Child , Child, Preschool , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Male , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Posture , Retrospective Studies
15.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 23(1): 35-9, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20065868

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study assessing new adjacent vertebral compression fracture (VCF) after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between cement leakage into the disk during initial PV and development of subsequent new adjacent VCF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cement leakage outside the vertebral body during PV has been reported and usually responds to conservative treatment. Sometimes bone cement may leak into the intervertebral disk and result in painful new adjacent VCF that usually requires another PV for pain relief. METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2002, a total of 106 consecutive patients underwent PVs for osteoporotic VCFs. The risk of new fractures of adjacent vertebral bodies, the amount of cement injection, and the duration of development of new adjacent fractures in relation to cement leakage into the disk were retrospectively assessed and statistically compared. RESULTS: New adjacent VCFs occurred in 20 (18.9%) of 106 patients at 22 adjacent vertebral bodies after PVs during at least 24 months of follow-up. The difference in number of new adjacent fractures between both patients and vertebral bodies with cement leakage and those without leakage into the disk were statistically significant (P<0.001 and P<0.001). Amounts of cement injected and duration to development of new adjacent fractures differed between patients with or without cement leakage (P<0.001 and P=0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PV is a simple and effective, but not risk-free or complication-free procedure for the treatment of osteoporotic VCF. Patients undergoing PV should be informed of the possibility of new adjacent fractures and the higher risk if cement leaks into the disk.


Subject(s)
Bone Cements/adverse effects , Foreign-Body Migration/complications , Fractures, Compression/chemically induced , Fractures, Compression/surgery , Intervertebral Disc/drug effects , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Vertebroplasty/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Back Pain/chemically induced , Back Pain/pathology , Back Pain/physiopathology , Causality , Disease Progression , Female , Foreign-Body Migration/diagnostic imaging , Foreign-Body Migration/pathology , Fractures, Compression/pathology , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control , Intervertebral Disc/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc/pathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Osteoporosis/complications , Polymethyl Methacrylate/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Radiography , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stress, Mechanical , Vertebroplasty/methods , Weight-Bearing/physiology
16.
Prog Transplant ; 20(1): 40-6, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20397345

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: For kidney transplant patients, a lifelong intake of medication is mandatory. Health care workers' prioritization of adverse effects often differs from that of their patients, although patients' experience of adverse effects of medication can trigger nonadherence. Understanding how patients experience symptoms is therefore important. OBJECTIVE: To present a new method to be used in research to evaluate symptom experience related to adverse effects in adult kidney transplant recipients on maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional secondary data analysis. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Three hundred fifty-six adult kidney transplant recipients from 2 Swiss transplant outpatient clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom experience was measured with the Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale. For each item, ridit scores were calculated. A coordinate system with occurrence and distress ratings of each symptom classified symptoms into 4 quadrants: symptoms could have high occurrence/high distress, low occurrence/high distress, high occurrence/low distress, and low occurrence/low distress symptoms. Items farther from the origin represented more extreme profiles. RESULTS: The proposed method arranges symptoms clearly in sequence of their importance. In our study, fatigue and joint and back pain were the most frequent and distressing symptoms. Symptom profiles for men and women differed: for men impotence and anxiety were key whereas for women listlessness and changed appearance seemed to play important roles. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-dimensional diagram of symptom profiles enables researchers and clinicians to evaluate the impact of symptoms associated with immunosuppressive medications.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation , Stress, Psychological/chemically induced , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Anxiety/chemically induced , Back Pain/chemically induced , Body Image , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Erectile Dysfunction/chemically induced , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Kidney Transplantation/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Methodology Research , Pain/chemically induced , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Distribution , Sex Factors , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Switzerland/epidemiology
17.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol ; 20(6): 809-13, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21526665

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) are defined as symmetrical bilateral pain in the back or buttocks or pain radiating to the lower extremities after recovery from spinal anesthesia. About 80-85% of cesarean sections are performed under spinal anesthesia in our centre. Our aim was to determine the incidence of TNS, risk factors and outcome of management in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Approval was obtained from the hospital ethic's committee, and consent from the patients. ASA 1 and 2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia formed the subjects of this prospective study. They were evaluated and pre-medicated by the attending anesthetists. Spinal anesthesia was performed at the L2-3 or L3-4 interspaces, using a 25G Quincke or 25G pencil point spinal needle with 0.5% heavy bupivacaine. The investigators interviewed the patients in the ward for three consecutive days, in order to identify those that developed TNS. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty consecutive patients were studied. TNS were documented in 12 (10%) patients. Backache was recorded in 8 patients (6.6%), pain in the thighs in 2 (1.7%) and pain in the buttocks in 2 (1.7%). Onset time of symptoms was recorded as 6-12 hrs in 5 (4.2%) patients, 12-24 hrs in 5 (4.2%) and 24-48 hrs in 2 (1.6%). The patients that developed TNS were managed accordingly with satisfactory outcome. CONCLUSION: A follow-up for all patients that receive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section should constitute a standard practice.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Bupivacaine/adverse effects , Cesarean Section , Pain/chemically induced , Adult , Back Pain/chemically induced , Buttocks , Female , Humans , Leg , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Thigh , Time Factors
18.
Clin Ther ; 42(8): 1519-1534.e33, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32739049

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Interest in Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists for cancer treatment has been renewed after promising preliminary clinical data in combination with checkpoint inhibitors. This first-in-human study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of intravenous GSK1795091, a synthetic TLR4 agonist, in healthy volunteers as a precursor to evaluation in patients with cancer. METHODS: Healthy participants were randomized (1:3; double-blinded manner) to receive placebo or a single intravenous injection of GSK1795091 at doses of 7-100 ng. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of GSK1795091; secondary and exploratory objectives were to characterize GSK1795091 PK and PD properties. FINDINGS: Forty participants received study treatment (10 received placebo and 30 received GSK1795091). Overall, 3 of the 10 participants (30%) who received placebo and 16 of the 30 (53%) who received GSK1795091 experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE). The most common AEs were influenza-like illness, headache, back pain, and increased body temperature. One participant experienced late-occurring AEs (alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase increases), considered possibly related to GSK1795091. No serious AEs were reported. GSK1795091 PK properties were characterized by dose proportional increase in exposure. Transient and dose-dependent changes in induced cytokine and chemokine concentrations and immune cell counts were observed 1-4 h after GSK1795091 administration and returned to baseline within 24 h. IMPLICATIONS: Intravenously administered GSK1795091 was acceptably tolerated in healthy volunteers, had favorable PK properties, and stimulated immune cell changes in a dose-dependent manner, providing evidence of target engagement and downstream pharmacology. These results supported the design and initiation of a repeat-dose study of intravenous GSK1795091 in combination with other immunotherapies in patients with advanced cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02798978.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Glycolipids , Toll-Like Receptor 4/agonists , Adult , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Back Pain/chemically induced , Body Temperature/drug effects , Cytokines/blood , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Glycolipids/administration & dosage , Glycolipids/adverse effects , Glycolipids/pharmacokinetics , Headache/chemically induced , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Immunotherapy , Infusions, Intravenous , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged
20.
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol ; 22(6): 448-54, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19876520

ABSTRACT

Back problems are important contributors to poor performance in sport horses. It has been shown that kinematic analysis can differentiate horses with back problems from asymptomatic horses. The underlying mechanism can, however, only be identified in a uniform, experimental setting. Our aim was to determine if induction of back pain in a well-defined site would result in a consistent change in back movement. Back kinematics were recorded at a walk and trot on a treadmill. Unilateral back pain was then induced by injecting lactic acid into the left longissimus dorsi muscle. Additional measurements were done subsequent to the injections. Data were captured during steady state locomotion at 240 Hz using an infrared-based gait analysis system. After the injections, the caudal thoracic back was more extended at both gaits. The back was also bent more to the left at both gaits. However, at the walk, there was a reversed pattern after a week with bending of the back to the unaffected side. Horses with identical back injuries appear to show similar changes in their back kinematics, as compared to the asymptomatic condition. Unilateral back pain seems to result in an increased extension of the back, as well as compensatory lateral movements. Back movements are complex and subtle, and changes are difficult to detect with the human eye. Present-day gait analysis systems can identify changes in the back movement, and knowledge of the relationship between such changes and the site of injury will be of help in better localising and diagnosing disorders of the equine back.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/veterinary , Horse Diseases/chemically induced , Animals , Back Pain/chemically induced , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Gait , Horses , Lactic Acid/toxicity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL