Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Mycoses ; 63(6): 617-624, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32274866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Persistent candidaemia (PC) is a recognised complication of candidaemia. Our objective was to evaluate risk factors and clinical significance of PC in adult patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cohort study. We compared PC with non-PC. All patients with blood cultures positive for Candida species were identified from a microbiological database in the hospital district of Helsinki and Uusimaa from 2007 to 2016. PC was defined as an isolation of the same Candida species from positive blood culture for ≥5 days. RESULTS: PC criteria were fulfilled by 75/350 patients (21.4%). No significant difference emerged between persistent and non-persistent cases caused by non-albicans Candida species (37.3% vs 35.1%, P = .742). The length of hospital stay before onset of candidaemia was longer before PC (hospital stay > 7 days; 73.3% vs 59.6%, P = .043). No significant impact on 30-day mortality was observed (20.0% vs 15.5%, P = .422). Using multivariable regression analysis, we found the presence of central venous catheter (CVC) (OR = 2.71, 95% CI 1.31-5.59), metastatic infection foci (OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.66-7.79) and ineffective empirical treatment (OR = 3.31, 95% CI 1.43-7.65) to be independent risk factors for PC. In subgroup analysis, early source control was identified as a protective factor against PC (30.5% vs 57.7%, P = .002). CONCLUSION: The presence of CVC, metastatic infection foci and ineffective empirical treatment were independently associated with PC in adult patients. Active search for and treatment of metastatic infection foci and removal of CVC are key elements for preventing PC.


Subject(s)
Candidemia/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candidemia/classification , Candidemia/mortality , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 21(11): 1942-50, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26488845

ABSTRACT

Many uncommon Candida species that cause bloodstream infections (BSIs) are not well-characterized. We investigated the epidemiology, antifungal use, susceptibility patterns, and factors associated with all-cause death among cancer patients in whom uncommon Candida spp. BSIs were diagnosed at a cancer treatment center during January 1998­September 2013. Of 1,395 Candida bloodstream isolates, 79 from 68 patients were uncommon Candida spp. The incidence density of uncommon Candida spp. BSIs and their proportion to all candidemia episodes substantively increased during the study period, and the rise was associated with increasing use of echinocandin antifungal drugs. Thirty-seven patients had breakthrough infections during therapy or prophylaxis with various systemic antifungal drugs for >7 consecutive days; 21 were receiving an echinocandin. C. kefyr (82%), and C. lusitaniae (21%) isolates frequently showed caspofungin MICs above the epidemiologic cutoff values. These findings support the need for institutional surveillance for uncommon Candida spp. among cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Candida/classification , Candidemia/epidemiology , Candidiasis/epidemiology , Neoplasms/microbiology , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candidemia/classification , Candidemia/microbiology , Candidiasis/classification , Candidiasis/microbiology , Culture Media , Education, Medical, Continuing , Humans , Incidence , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/immunology , Risk Factors , Texas/epidemiology
3.
Mycoses ; 58(8): 498-505, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26155849

ABSTRACT

Defining the epidemiology of and risk factors for candidaemia is necessary to guide empirical treatment. The objectives of this study were to determine the ranking of Candida among positive blood cultures, to define the epidemiology of candidaemia and to investigate patient characteristics and their relationship with C. albicans vs. non-albicans Candida (NAC) candidaemia. Candidaemia episodes between January 2001 and December 2010 were evaluated retrospectively. Patient characteristics were compared across Candida species. Candida ranked as the fifth most frequently isolated pathogen. Among 381 candidaemia episodes, 58.3% were due to C. albicans, followed by C. parapsilosis (15.2%), C. tropicalis (13.4%) and C. glabrata (6.8%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the distribution of C. albicans vs. NAC (P = 0.432). Patients with NAC had significantly higher rates of haematological disorders (P < 0.001) and neutropenia (P = 0.003), and were older (P = 0.024) than patients with C. albicans, whereas patients with urinary catheters had higher rates of C. albicans (P = 0.007). On species basis, C. tropicalis was more frequently isolated from patients with haematological disorders (P < 0.001) and neutropenia (P = 0.008). Patients with urinary catheters were less likely to have C. parapsilosis (P = 0.043). C. glabrata was most prevalent among patients with solid organ tumours (P = 0.038), but not evident in patients with haematological disorders. Local epidemiological features and risk factors may have important implications for the management of candidaemia.


Subject(s)
Candida/isolation & purification , Candidemia/epidemiology , Candidemia/prevention & control , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Healthcare/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Candida/classification , Candida/pathogenicity , Candida albicans/isolation & purification , Candida albicans/pathogenicity , Candida glabrata/isolation & purification , Candida glabrata/pathogenicity , Candida tropicalis/pathogenicity , Candidemia/classification , Candidemia/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Neutropenia/complications , Neutropenia/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Turkey/epidemiology
4.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 9(10): 923-40, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21973304

ABSTRACT

There are a variety of diseases, from local mucous membrane infections to invasive systemic infections, that are caused by Candida species. As a causative agent, Candida albicans is the most common; however, the other Candida species can also cause the same clinical syndromes. Most invasive fungal infections in children occur in the hospital setting. Candidemia is a serious condition associated with high morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs in pediatric patients. Children at the highest risk are those with prolonged intensive care unit stays, reduced immune function, recent surgery, prior bacterial infection, prior use of antibiotics and/or corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents, as well as use of a central venous catheter, total parenteral nutrition, mechanical ventilation and dialysis. Positive blood culture is the gold standard of candidemia; it should not be accepted as contamination or colonization in children with an intravascular catheter. However, in oropharyngeal or vulvovaginal candidiasis, culture of lesions is rarely indicated unless the disease is recalcitrant or recurrent. Recovery of Candida from the sputum should usually be considered as colonization and should not be treated with antifungal therapy. Antigen and antibody detecting tests are evaluated in invasive Candida infections; however, there are no published results in children, and their roles in diagnosis are also unclear. For the therapy of invasive Candida infections in non-neutropenic patients, fluconazole or an echinocandin is usually recommended. Alternatively, amphotericin B deoxycholate or lipid formulations of amphotericin B can also be used. The recommended therapy of Candida meningitis is amphotericin B combined with flucytosine. The combination therapy for Candida infections is usually not indicated. Prophylaxis in non-neonatal, immunocompetent children is not recommended.


Subject(s)
Amphotericin B/administration & dosage , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Candida/drug effects , Candidemia/drug therapy , Catheter-Related Infections/drug therapy , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Deoxycholic Acid/administration & dosage , Echinocandins/administration & dosage , Fluconazole/administration & dosage , Flucytosine/administration & dosage , Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida/classification , Candida/isolation & purification , Candida/physiology , Candidemia/classification , Candidemia/diagnosis , Candidemia/microbiology , Candidemia/mortality , Candidemia/pathology , Catheter-Related Infections/classification , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/mortality , Catheter-Related Infections/pathology , Child , Cross Infection/classification , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Cross Infection/pathology , Deoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Echinocandins/therapeutic use , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Flucytosine/therapeutic use , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units , Leukocyte Count , Mycological Typing Techniques , Neutrophils/cytology , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL