Survival with Cemiplimab in Recurrent Cervical Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent cervical cancer have a poor prognosis. Cemiplimab, the fully human programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody approved to treat lung and skin cancers, has been shown to have preliminary clinical activity in this population. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had disease progression after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, regardless of their programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cemiplimab (350 mg every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of single-agent chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival. Progression-free survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 608 women were enrolled (304 in each group). In the overall trial population, median overall survival was longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group (12.0 months vs. 8.5 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.84; two-sided P<0.001). The overall survival benefit was consistent in both histologic subgroups (squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma [including adenosquamous carcinoma]). Progression-free survival was also longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group in the overall population (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; two-sided P<0.001). In the overall population, an objective response occurred in 16.4% (95% CI, 12.5 to 21.1) of the patients in the cemiplimab group, as compared with 6.3% (95% CI, 3.8 to 9.6) in the chemotherapy group. An objective response occurred in 18% (95% CI, 11 to 28) of the cemiplimab-treated patients with PD-L1 expression greater than or equal to 1% and in 11% (95% CI, 4 to 25) of those with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. Overall, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 45.0% of the patients who received cemiplimab and in 53.4% of those who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was significantly longer with cemiplimab than with single-agent chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; EMPOWER-Cervical 1/GOG-3016/ENGOT-cx9 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03257267.).

Chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter AGEO study.

Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) account for <5% of pancreatic malignancies. The efficacy of modern chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced PASC is unknown. Patients with advanced PASC from 2008 to 2021 were consecutively included in this retrospective multicenter study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Ninety-four PASC from 16 French centers were included (median age, 67.3 years; males, 56.4%; metastatic disease, 85.1%). The first-line treatment was chemotherapy for 79 patients (84.0%) (37 FOLFIRINOX (FX), 7 Gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel (GN) and 35 for all other regimen) or best supportive care (BSC) alone for 15 patients (16.0%). No significant difference was observed between FX and GN in terms of PFS (P = .67) or OS (P = .5). Modern regimens pooled together (FX and GN) as compared to all others chemotherapy regimens showed an improvement of overall response rate (39.5% and 9.7%, P = .002), PFS (median, 7.8 vs 4.7 months, P = .02) and OS (median, 12.7 vs 9.2 months, P = .35). This large study evaluating first-line treatment regimens in advanced PASC suggests that modern regimens as FX or GN may be preferable to all other chemotherapy regimens. These results deserve confirmation in prospective studies.

[A case of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma successfully treated by chemoradiotherapy].

Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma is a rare primary pancreas malignant tumor with very poor prognosis, for which there is no standard treatment. The case was of a 71-year-old woman who was admitted to the hospital with jaundice. A pancreatic head tumor was found, and pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma was diagnosed in EUS-FNA. Despite confirmed distant metastasis, a multidisciplinary treatment centered on chemoradiotherapy gave her a 28-month prognosis.

Efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The usual treatment for metastatic or recurrent PASC is systemic chemotherapy in accordance with the PDAC treatment strategy. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy, especially the benefit of recent combination therapies, in patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 116 patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC treated with first-line chemotherapy between April 2001 and December 2017 at 24 Japanese institutions. RESULTS: Combination chemotherapies included gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP, n = 28), fluorouracil/leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FFX, n = 10), gemcitabine + S-1 (GS, n = 10), and others (n = 9). Monotherapies included gemcitabine (n = 51) and S-1 (n = 8). The median overall survival (OS) was 6.5, 7.3, and 4.3 months for the whole cohort, the combination therapy group, and the monotherapy group, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that combination therapy showed a better trend in OS than monotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.20). GnP or FFX were selected in 58.7% of patients after FFX was approved in Japan, and revealed a median OS, median progression-free survival, and objective response rate of 7.3 months, 2.8 months, and 26.9% in GnP and 7.2 months, 2.3 months, and 20.0% in FFX respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that combination therapy may be more effective than monotherapy. GnP and FFX showed similar and clinically meaningful efficacy for patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab for treatment of US patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of pembrolizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer has been demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness from the United States (US) healthcare payers perspective. METHODS: A partitioned survival model over a 30-year lifetime horizon was developed to compare the cost and effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus placebo based on clinical data from the KEYNOTE-826 phase 3 randomized trial. Costs and health state utilities were obtained from literature and publicly available databases. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was measured. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: For the Intention-to-Treat patients, pembrolizumab was associated with an additional 0.74 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) at an additional cost of $182,271 when compared with placebo. The ICER was $247,663/QALY. For patients with a programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥ 1 and 10, the ICER was $253,322/QALY and $214,212/QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that pembrolizumab had the greatest impact on the ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the probability of pembrolizumab being cost-effective was zero at the current willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. The price of pembrolizumab had to reduce at least to $28.336 (55.8% of the current price) for it to be cost-effective in a 50% of chance. CONCLUSION: The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy is costly and might not be cost-effective for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer at the current price in the US.

A phase II trial of the super-enhancer inhibitor Minnelide™ in advanced refractory adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas.

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is a very rare and highly aggressive variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, accounting for 0.5-4% of all pancreatic cancer cases in the USA. Current data indicate that epigenetic changes and MYC overexpression lead to squamous transdifferentiation of pancreatic tumor cells and development of ASCP. Minnelide™, an oral anti-super-enhancer drug that inhibits MYC expression in preclinical models of ASCP, has demonstrated safety in a phase I study. We describe the design for a phase II, open-label, single-arm trial of Minnelide in patients with advanced refractory ASCP.

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is a rare and highly aggressive variant of pancreatic cancer, with limited treatment options. Changes in activation of DNA elements called super-enhancers drive the growth of ASCP. Minnelide™ is an oral drug that blocks the super-enhancer network and is safe to give to patients with advanced cancer. This trial is designed to determine whether Minnelide can shrink tumors in patients with ASCP who have already received at least one previous treatment for their cancer.  Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04896073 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Adenosquamous cancer of the pancreas: A multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Adenosquamous cancer of the pancreas (ASCP) is an aggressive, infrequent subtype of pancreatic cancer that combines a glandular and squamous component and is associated with poor survival. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective observational study carried out at three Spanish hospitals. The study period was: January 2010-August 2020. A descriptive analysis of the data was performed, as well as an analysis of global and disease-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier statistic. RESULTS: Of a total of 668 pancreatic cancers treated surgically, twelve were ASCP (1.8%). Patient mean age was 69.2±7.4 years. Male/female ratio was 1:1. The main symptom was jaundice (seven patients). Correct preoperative diagnosis was obtained in only two patients. Nine pancreatoduodenectomies and three distal pancreatosplenectomies were performed. 25% had major complications. Mean tumor size was 48.6±19.4mm. Nine patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median survival time was 5.9 months, and median disease-free survival was 4.6 months. 90% of patients presented recurrence. Ten of the twelve patients in the study (83.3%) died, with disease progression being the cause in eight. Of the two surviving patients, one is disease-free and the other has liver metastases. CONCLUSION: ASCP is a very rare pancreatic tumor with aggressive behavior. It is rarely diagnosed preoperatively. The best treatment, if feasible, is surgery followed by the standard chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

[A Case of Resected Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma with Early Hepatic Metastatic Recurrence].

A 73-year-old man was presented with epigastric pain and indicated high CA19-9 levels, and computed tomography detected a tumor in the uncinate process of the pancreas infiltrated duodenum and superior mesenteric artery. The patient was diagnosed with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1. During neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patient also received radiotherapy to control duodenal bleeding. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, stable disease(SD)was proven on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST), and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. The pathological findings showed pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma. After 7 days postoperatively, hepatic metastasis was detected, and after 78 days postoperatively, the patient died.

[A Patient with Gastric Adenosquamous Cell Carcinoma].

A 73-year-old female was referred from a local clinic with abdominal pain. A diagnosis of gastric cancer(cT3, cN0, M0, cStage ⅡB)and acute cholecystitis was made. Distal gastrectomy, D2, and cholecystectomy were performed. Postoperative pathological examination led to a diagnosis of adenosquamous cell carcinoma(pT3, pN2, M0, pStage ⅢA). SOX therapy was administered as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, multiple liver metastases were detected. XP and DTX therapies were administered; however, there was a reduction in performance status. The patient died 10 months after surgery. Gastric adenosquamous cell carcinoma is classified as a specific type according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma(15th edition). This carcinoma accounts for 0.3 to 0.5% of patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery and is relatively rare. Its malignancy level is higher than that of gastric adenocarcinoma, and its prognosis is poorer.

Unresectable primary hepatic adenosquamous carcinoma successfully treated with systemic and transcatheter hepatic arterial injection chemotherapies followed by conversion surgery: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Primary hepatic adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is a type of tumor that has the features of both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The prognosis for patients with ASC is poor, as the chemotherapy has been ineffective so far. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report a case of a 62-year-old male patient who presented with high fever. The tumor marker levels were high, and abdominal dynamic computed tomography showed a liver tumor and distant lymph node metastases. Upon further investigation, needle biopsy of the liver tumor showed a primary hepatic SCC. Because the SCC was unresectable, the patient was treated with tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and transcatheter hepatic arterial injection (TAI) of cisplatin. After chemotherapy, a surgical resection performed on the remaining liver tumor, made the patient cancer-free. After the operation, the liver tumor was confirmed as primary hepatic ASC. Subsequently, the patient was administered postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, which prevented its recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the lack of an effective treatment for primary hepatic ASC, its prognosis is poor. Here, we suggest that a chemotherapy combination of 5-fluorouracil (S-1) and cisplatin along with conversion surgery might be an effective way for treating primary hepatic ASC. Our experience from this case shall be valuable to clinicians around the world involved in the treatment of primary hepatic ASC.

[Erlotinib plus Bevacizumab Therapy for Postoperative Recurrence of Adenosquamous Cell Carcinoma Harboring EGFR Mutation-A Case Report].

A 59-year-old man clinically diagnosed with primary lung cancer underwent left lower lobectomy and lymph node dissection( ND2a-2). The postoperative pathological stage was ⅠB(pT2aN0M0), and the lesion was positive for epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)exon 21 L858R mutation. Thirty months after surgery, the patient developed pleural dissemination and effusion in the left pleural cavity. Carboplatin(AUC=6, day 1, every 3 weeks)and nab-paclitaxel(100 mg/m2, day 1 and day 8, every 3 weeks)were administered as first-line therapy. Progressive disease was evident 10 months after 4 courses of first-line therapy. Pembrolizumab(200 mg, day 1, every 3 weeks)was then administered as second-line therapy. After 7 months(9 courses of therapy), the lung cancer had metastasized to the left third intercostal muscle, and the pleural nodules regrew. The former lesion was treated with radiotherapy owing to the development of pain in the chest. Erlotinib (150 mg once daily)and bevacizumab(15 mg/kg, day 1, every 3 weeks)were initiated as third-line therapy, resulting in complete response at 14 months(67 months after surgery, 37 months after postoperative recurrence). The prognosis of patients with EGFR-positive pulmonary adenosquamous carcinoma and undergoing treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKI)is reportedly poor. Herein, we report a rare case of adenosquamous carcinoma with EGFR mutation presenting complete response following treatment with EGFR-TKI.

Significant Benefits of Osimertinib Against Adenosquamous Carcinoma Harboring Germline T790M Mutation.

BACKGROUND: The identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations represents a milestone in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with lung adenosquamous carcinomas (ASCs) rarely present with germline EGFR T790M mutation. The optimal treatment for cancers with germline EGFR T790M mutation (especially ASC) is not clear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using next-generation sequencing, we tested 450 cancer-related genes in a 27-year-old patient's lung adenosquamous carcinoma and matched blood samples. Germline mutations in samples from the patient's available relatives were identified by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: We identified germline EGFR T790M mutation in the patient's lung adenosquamous carcinoma. He was treated with osimertinib and achieved complete response for more than 30 months, without significant drug-related adverse events. Genetic testing showed that germline EGFR T790M mutation might be a characteristic of inherited lung cancer. CONCLUSION: Osimertinib can be a treatment option for patients with lung ASC harboring germline EGFR T790M mutation. KEY POINTS: A patient with adenosquamous carcinoma harboring a germline T790M mutation responded well to osimertinib with a progression-free survival of more than 30 months and without any unexpected toxicities. Osimertinib is effective for patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma with T790M and L858R mutations. The germline EGFR T790M mutation is associated with genetic susceptibility to lung cancer. The clinical use of next-generation sequencing could maximize the benefits of precision medicine in patients with cancer.

Genomic origin and EGFR-TKI treatments of pulmonary adenosquamous carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the lung is a heterogeneous disease that is composed of both adenocarcinoma components (ACC) and squamous cell carcinoma components (SCCC). Their genomic profile, genetic origin, and clinical management remain controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Resected ASC and metastatic tumor in regional lymph nodes (LNs) were collected. The ACC and SCCC were separated by microdissection of primary tumor. The 1021 cancer-related genes were evaluated by next-generation sequencing independently in ACC and SCCC and LNs. Shared and private alterations in the two components were investigated. In addition, genomic profiles of independent cohorts of adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas were examined for comparison. We have also carried out a retrospective study of ASCs with known EGFR mutation status from 11 hospitals in China for their clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The most frequent alterations in 28 surgically resected ASCs include EGFR (79%), TP53 (68%), MAP3K1 (14%) mutations, EGFR amplifications (32%), and MDM2 amplifications (18%). Twenty-seven patients (96%) had shared variations between ACC and SCCC, and pure SCCC metastases were not found in metastatic LNs among these patients. Only one patient with geographically separated ACC and SCCC had no shared mutations. Inter-component heterogeneity was a common genetic event of ACC and SCCC. The genomic profile of ASC was similar to that of 170 adenocarcinomas, but different from that of 62 squamous cell carcinomas. The incidence of EGFR mutations in the retrospective analysis of 517 ASCs was 51.8%. Among the 129 EGFR-positive patients who received EGFR-TKIs, the objective response rate was 56.6% and the median progression-free survival was 10.1 months (95% confidence interval: 9.0-11.2). CONCLUSIONS: The ACC and SCCC share a monoclonal origin, a majority with genetically inter-component heterogeneity. ASC may represent a subtype of adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation being the most common genomic anomaly and sharing similar efficacy to EGFR TKI.

Early relapse on adjuvant gemcitabine associated with an exceptional response to 2nd line capecitabine chemotherapy in a patient with pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma with strong intra-tumoural expression of cytidine deaminase: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma has a poor prognosis, with limited prospective trial data to guide optimal treatment. The potential impact of drug metabolism on the treatment response of patients with pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma is largely unknown. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a 51 year old woman with pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma who, following surgical resection, experienced early disease relapse during adjuvant gemcitabine therapy. Paradoxically, this was followed by an exceptional response to capecitabine therapy lasting 34.6 months. Strong expression of cytidine deaminase was detected within the tumour. CONCLUSIONS: This case study demonstrates that early relapse during adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma may be compatible with a subsequent exceptional response to second line chemotherapy, an important observation given the poor overall prognosis of patients with adenosquamous carcinoma. Cytidine deaminase is predicted to inactivate gemcitabine and, conversely, catalyze capecitabine activation. We discuss strong intra-tumoural expression of cytidine deaminase as a potential mechanism to explain this patient's disparate responses to gemcitabine and capecitabine therapy, and highlight the benefit that may be gained from considering similar determinants of response to chemotherapy in clinical practice.

A multi-institutional observational study on the effects of three-dimensional radiotherapy and weekly 40-mg/m2 cisplatin on postoperative uterine cervical cancer patients with high-risk prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of treatment with both three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) and weekly 40-mg/m2 cisplatin on postoperative uterine cervical cancer patients with high-risk prognostic factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional chart review of postoperative uterine cervical cancer patients with high-risk prognostic factors who had been treated with both 3DRT and weekly 40-mg/m2 cisplatin from 2007 to 2012. Each participating hospital provided detailed information regarding patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, and treatment complications. RESULTS: The eligible 96 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 61 months. The 3-year relapse-free survival, overall survival (OS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates were 76%, 90%, and 88%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the histological finding of either adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma was a significant risk factor for both OS and LRFS. The percentage of patients with grade ≥ 3 acute hematologic toxicity, acute lower gastrointestinal toxicity (GIT), and late lower GIT were 45%, 19%, and 17%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using weekly 40-mg/m2 cisplatin are similar to those in the previous studies that used several chemotherapy regimens. However, postoperative CCRT using 3DRT had a high level of late GIT.

A retrospective analysis of cisplatin/carboplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

To compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) and paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP) in the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, this retrospective study included 116 advanced or recurrent cervical cancer cases treated at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital between June 2002 and June 2014. Of these cases, 52 were treated with TC (TC group) and 64 were treated with TP (TP group). We found that the overall survival and response and disease-control rates were not significantly different between the two groups. The TC group had a markedly lower incidence of Grade III-IV gastrointestinal toxicity reactions and a shorter hospitalisation stay than the TP group. The incidences of Grade III-IV bone marrow suppression and renal toxicity were not significantly different between the TP and TC groups. These findings suggest that TC may be a safe and effective alternative to TP for the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject: Paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP) is regarded as the standard regimen for cervical cancer, nevertheless, cisplatin is always associated with nephrotoxicity and requires hydration therapy. Carboplatin is a platinum analogue with milder nephrotoxicity than cisplatin. It is reported that carboplatin may be a viable and less toxic alternative to cisplatin in the management of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, but another study shows that the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) is non-inferior to that of TP. What the results of this study add: This study compared the efficacy and safety of TC and TP, and found that the TC and TP groups had similar overall response and disease-control rates and survival, but the TC group was better tolerated with a markedly lower incidence of Grades III-IV gastrointestinal toxicity reactions and had a shorter hospitalisation stay than the TP group. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: TC may be a safe and effective alternative to TP for the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer in clinical practice.

[A Case of Adenosquamous Carcinoma of Pancreas Treated with Conversion Surgery after Systemic Chemotherapy].

CASE: A man in his 60s reported upper abdominal pain; close examination revealed a tumor in the body-tail of the pancreas that was suspected to be infiltrating the stomach. Multiple liver lesions(S3, S4)were also detected. Histological examination by EUS-FNA showed poorly-differentiated carcinoma; thus, this case was diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic cancer with liver metastases(cT3, cN1[No. 7], cM1[P0, H1], cStage Ⅳ: JPS 7th). After 2 kinds of systemic chemotherapy(9 courses of GEM plus nab-PTX and 9 courses of modified FOLFIRINOX), obvious distant metastases or local progression did not appear and conversion surgery was scheduled. Although a metastatic lesion was identified at S5 of the liver just before the surgery, it was assumed that an R0 resection could be achieved; therefore, the operation(distal pancreatectomy with combined proximal gastrectomy, left adrenalectomy, lymph node dissection, partial hepatectomy of S5, and cholecystectomy)was performed. Histopathological examination showed squamous metaplasia of the epithelial tissue combined with glandular formation. This case was, thus, diagnosed as adenosquamous carcinoma of pancreas. This patient was discharged 90 days after the operation. The patient is still alive 2 years and 2 months since the first diagnosis.

Impact of tumour histology on survival in advanced cervical carcinoma: an NRG Oncology/Gynaecologic Oncology Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Based primarily on studies concerning early-stage tumours (treated surgically), and locally advanced disease (treated with chemoradiation), the prognosis for women with adenocarcinoma (AC) or adenosquamous (AS) carcinoma has been reported to be poorer than those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the cervix. It is unclear whether differences in prognosis also persist in the setting of recurrent or metastatic disease treated using chemotherapy doublets with or without bevacizumab. METHODS: Cases were pooled from three Gynaecologic Oncology Group randomised phase III trials of chemotherapy doublets. Pearson's test was used to evaluate response rate (RR) of AC/AS vs SCCA, Kaplan-Meier method to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the impact of histology on PFS and OS. RESULTS: Of 781 evaluable patients, 77% (N=599) had SCCA and 23% (N=182) AC/AS. There were no significant differences in RRs between histologic subgroups. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death for SCCA vs AC/AS was 1.13 (95% CI 0.93, 1.38 P=0.23). When comparing SC/AS (N=661, 85%) to AC alone (N=120, 15%), the adjusted HR for death was 1.23 (95% CI 0.97, 1.57, P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: AC/AS and SCCA have similar survival in recurrent or metastatic cervical carcinoma when treated with chemotherapy doublets.

Impact of TP53 mutation status on systemic treatment outcome in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: We analyzed whether co-occurring mutations influence the outcome of systemic therapy in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: ALK-rearranged stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients were analyzed with next-generation sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses on a centralized diagnostic platform. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined in the total cohort and in treatment-related sub-cohorts. Cox regression analyses were carried out to exclude confounders. Results: Among 216 patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, the frequency of pathogenic TP53 mutations was 23.8%, while other co-occurring mutations were rare events. In ALK/TP53 co-mutated patients, median PFS and OS were significantly lower compared with TP53 wildtype patients [PFS 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.4-5.6) versus 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.6-12.0), P < 0.001; OS 15.0 months (95% CI: 5.0-24.9) versus 50.0 months (95% CI: 22.9-77.1), P = 0.002]. This difference was confirmed in all treatment-related subgroups including chemotherapy only [PFS first-line chemotherapy 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.3-4.1) versus 6.2 months (95% CI: 1.8-10.5), P = 0.021; OS 2.0 months (95% CI: 0.0-4.6) versus 9.0 months (95% CI: 6.1-11.9), P = 0.035], crizotinib plus chemotherapy [PFS crizotinib 5.0 months (95% CI: 2.9-7.2) versus 14.0 months (95% CI: 8.0-20.1), P < 0.001; OS 17.0 months (95% CI: 6.7-27.3) versus not reached, P = 0.049] and crizotinib followed by next-generation ALK-inhibitor [PFS next-generation inhibitor 5.4 months (95% CI: 0.1-10.7) versus 9.9 months (95% CI: 6.4-13.5), P = 0.039; OS 7.0 months versus 50.0 months (95% CI: not reached), P = 0.001). Conclusions: In ALK-rearranged NSCLC co-occurring TP53 mutations predict an unfavorable outcome of systemic therapy. Our observations encourage future research to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms and to improve treatment outcome of the ALK/TP53 co-mutated subgroup.

Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although some retrospective studies have suggested the value of adjuvant therapy, no recommended standard exists in bile duct cancer. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy would improve survival probability in resected bile duct cancer. METHODS: This was a randomized phase III trial. Patients with resected bile duct cancer were assigned randomly to gemcitabine and observation groups, which were balanced with respect to lymph node status, residual tumour status and tumour location. Gemcitabine was given intravenously at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 , administered on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for six cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival, subgroup analysis and toxicity. RESULTS: Some 225 patients were included (117 gemcitabine, 108 observation). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the gemcitabine and observation groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (median 62·3 versus 63·8 months respectively; hazard ratio 1·01, 95 per cent c.i. 0·70 to 1·45; P = 0·964) and relapse-free survival (median 36·0 versus 39·9 months; hazard ratio 0·93, 0·66 to 1·32; P = 0·693). There were no survival differences between the two groups in subsets stratified by lymph node status and margin status. Although haematological toxicity occurred frequently in the gemcitabine group, most toxicities were transient, and grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicity was rare. CONCLUSION: The survival probability in patients with resected bile duct cancer was not significantly different between the gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy group and the observation group. Registration number: UMIN 000000820 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/).