ABSTRACT
International differences in the incidence of many cancer types indicate the existence of carcinogen exposures that have not yet been identified by conventional epidemiology make a substantial contribution to cancer burden1. In clear cell renal cell carcinoma, obesity, hypertension and tobacco smoking are risk factors, but they do not explain the geographical variation in its incidence2. Underlying causes can be inferred by sequencing the genomes of cancers from populations with different incidence rates and detecting differences in patterns of somatic mutations. Here we sequenced 962 clear cell renal cell carcinomas from 11 countries with varying incidence. The somatic mutation profiles differed between countries. In Romania, Serbia and Thailand, mutational signatures characteristic of aristolochic acid compounds were present in most cases, but these were rare elsewhere. In Japan, a mutational signature of unknown cause was found in more than 70% of cases but in less than 2% elsewhere. A further mutational signature of unknown cause was ubiquitous but exhibited higher mutation loads in countries with higher incidence rates of kidney cancer. Known signatures of tobacco smoking correlated with tobacco consumption, but no signature was associated with obesity or hypertension, suggesting that non-mutagenic mechanisms of action underlie these risk factors. The results of this study indicate the existence of multiple, geographically variable, mutagenic exposures that potentially affect tens of millions of people and illustrate the opportunities for new insights into cancer causation through large-scale global cancer genomics.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Environmental Exposure , Geography , Kidney Neoplasms , Mutagens , Mutation , Female , Humans , Male , Aristolochic Acids/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/chemically induced , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Genome, Human/genetics , Genomics , Hypertension/epidemiology , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/chemically induced , Mutagens/adverse effects , Obesity/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Romania/epidemiology , Serbia/epidemiology , Thailand/epidemiology , Tobacco Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Smoking/geneticsABSTRACT
The landscape of the management of renal cell carcinoma has evolved substantially in the last decade, leading to improved survival in localised and advanced disease. We review the epidemiology, pathology, and diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma and discuss the evidence for current management strategies from localised to metastatic disease. Developments in adjuvant therapies are discussed, including use of pembrolizumab-the first therapy to achieve overall survival benefit in the adjuvant setting. The treatment of advanced disease, including landmark trials that have established immune checkpoint inhibition as a standard of care, are also reviewed. We also discuss the current controversies that exist surrounding the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, including the use of risk assessment models for disease stratification and treatment selection for frontline therapy. Management of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma subtypes is also reviewed. Future directions of research, including a discussion of ongoing clinical trials and the need for reliable biomarkers to guide treatment in kidney cancer, are also highlighted.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, AdjuvantABSTRACT
Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at a higher risk of developing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) than the general population. In vitro and in vivo investigations of the effects of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) have shown a significantly reduced risk of RCC. However, the impact of these drugs on the incidence of RCC in the human population is unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between SGLT2I use and RCC risk in patients with T2D. We undertook a nationwide retrospective cohort study using the Health and Welfare Data Science Center database (2016-2020). The primary outcome was the risk of incident RCC by estimating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multiple Cox regression modeling was applied to analyze the association between SGLT2I use and RCC risk in patients with T2D. In a cohort of 241,772 patients with T2D who were using SGLT2Is and 483,544 participants who were not, 220 and 609 RCC cases, respectively, were recorded. The mean follow-up period of the study subjects was 2 years. There was a decreased risk of RCC for SGLT2I users after adjusting for the index year, sex, age, comorbidities, and concurrent medication (adjusted HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81). The sensitivity test for the propensity score 1:1-matched analyses showed similar results (adjusted HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81). The subgroup analysis revealed consistent results for sex, age (<70 years), and comorbidity with chronic kidney disease. The present study indicates that SGLT2I therapy significantly decreases RCC risk in patients with T2D. This finding was also consistent among the sensitivity test and subgroup analysis for those with or without chronic kidney disease/hypertension.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Kidney Neoplasms , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Humans , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Incidence , Adult , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to investigate the association between family history of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and RCC risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RCC cases diagnosed in Sweden between 2005 and 2014 and 10 matched controls were identified using the Renal Cell Cancer Database Sweden, with linkage to the Multigeneration Register and the Swedish Cancer Registry. The association between a family history of RCC and RCC was investigated, overall and by sex and age groups. RESULTS: Among 9416 RCC cases, 294 (3.1%) had 1 or more parent or sibling (first-degree relative [FDR]) with RCC. Median age at diagnosis for cases with an affected FDR was 65 years (IQR 59-71) and 68 years (IQR 60-75) for all cases. The proportion of women was significantly higher among familial RCC compared to sporadic RCC (44.6% vs 38.5%, P = .035). RCC was twice as likely with 1 or more FDR with RCC (OR 1.9; CI 1.65-2.16). Stratified analysis showed an OR of 2.4 for women (CI 1.93-2.92) and 1.6 for men (CI 1.35-1.93). Two or more FDRs was associated with a sixfold increased risk (95% CI 2.37-15.5). Familial RCC was strongly associated with bilateral and multifocal tumors (OR 5.5; CI 2.36-13.0, OR 3.5; CI 1.89-6.49). CONCLUSIONS: In this Swedish data set, 3.1% of RCC patients have 1 or more FDR diagnosed with RCC. There was no statistical difference in median age between sporadic RCC and familial RCC. Having 1 or more FDR with RCC approximately doubles the risk of RCC with a higher risk increase for women than for men. People with 2 FDRs with RCC constitute a small high-risk group that may benefit from screening.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Female , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Family , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We examine the heterogeneity and distribution of the cohort populations in two publicly used radiological image cohorts, the Cancer Genome Atlas Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma (TCIA TCGA KIRC) collection and 2019 MICCAI Kidney Tumor Segmentation Challenge (KiTS19), and deviations in real-world population renal cancer data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) Participant User Data File (PUF) and tertiary center data. PUF data are used as an anchor for prevalence rate bias assessment. Specific gene expression and, therefore, biology of RCC differ by self-reported race, especially between the African American and Caucasian populations. AI algorithms learn from datasets, but if the dataset misrepresents the population, reinforcing bias may occur. Ignoring these demographic features may lead to inaccurate downstream effects, thereby limiting the translation of these analyses to clinical practice. Consciousness of model training biases is vital to patient care decisions when using models in clinical settings. METHODS: Data elements evaluated included gender, demographics, reported pathologic grading, and cancer staging. American Urological Association risk levels were used. Poisson regression was performed to estimate the population-based and sample-specific estimation for prevalence rate and corresponding 95% confidence interval. SAS 9.4 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Compared to PUF, KiTS19 and TCGA KIRC oversampled Caucasian by 9.5% (95% CI, -3.7 to 22.7%) and 15.1% (95% CI, 1.5 to 28.8%), undersampled African American by -6.7% (95% CI, -10% to -3.3%), and -5.5% (95% CI, -9.3% to -1.8%). Tertiary also undersampled African American by -6.6% (95% CI, -8.7% to -4.6%). The tertiary cohort largely undersampled aggressive cancers by -14.7% (95% CI, -20.9% to -8.4%). No statistically significant difference was found among PUF, TCGA, and KiTS19 in aggressive rate; however, heterogeneities in risk are notable. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneities between cohorts need to be considered in future AI training and cross-validation for renal masses.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Artificial Intelligence , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urology , White People/statistics & numerical data , WhiteABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the United States, the rate of benign histology among resected renal tumors suspected to be malignant is increasing. We evaluated the rates in the Republic of Korea and assessed the racial effect using recent multi-institutional Korean-United States data. METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of 11,529 patients (8,812 from The Republic of Korea and 2,717 from the United States) and compared the rates of benign histology between the two countries. To evaluate the racial effect, we divided the patients into Korean, Asian in the US, and Non-Asian in the US. RESULTS: The rates of benign histology and small renal masses in Korean patients were significantly lower than that in United States patients (6.3% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001) and (≤ 4 cm, 7.6% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001), respectively. Women, incidentaloma, partial nephrectomy, minimally invasive surgery, and recent surgery were associated with a higher rate of benign histology than others. CONCLUSIONS: In Korea, the rate of benign histology among resected renal tumors was significantly lower than that in the United States. This disparity could be caused by environmental or cultural differences rather than racial differences. Our findings suggest that re-evaluating current context-specific standards of care is necessary to avoid overtreatment.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Female , United States/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney/pathology , Nephrectomy , Republic of Korea/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) care in the Netherlands. METHODS: Newly diagnosed RCCs between 2018 and 2021 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry; 2020-2021 was defined as COVID period and 2018-2019 as reference period. Numbers of RCCs were evaluated using 3-week-moving averages, overall and by disease stage and age. Changes in treatment were evaluated with logistic regression analyses. To evaluate possible delays in care, time to start of treatment was assessed. The cumulative number of metastatic RCC (mRCC) over time was assessed to evaluate stage shift. RESULTS: During the 1st COVID wave (weeks 9-22, 2020), the number of new RCC diagnoses decreased with 15%. Numbers restored partially in 2020, but remained 10% lower compared to 2018/2019. The decline was mostly due to a drop in T1a/T1b RCCs and in age > 70 years. 2021 showed similar numbers of new RCC diagnoses compared to 2018/2019 without an increase due to previously missed RCCs. Treatment-related changes during the 1st COVID wave were limited and temporarily; less surgery in T1a RCCs in favor of more active surveillance, and in mRCC targeted therapy was preferred over immunotherapy. Time to start of firstline treatment was not prolonged during the 1st COVID wave. No increase in mRCC was found until the end of 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in fewer RCC diagnoses, especially T1a/T1b tumors. Treatment-related changes appeared to be limited, temporarily and in accordance with the adapted guidelines. The diagnostic delay could lead to more advanced RCCs in later years but there are no indications for this yet.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Delayed Diagnosis , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome is a rare genetic syndrome caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in the FLCN gene. Patients with BHD syndrome have an increased risk of fibrofolliculomas, pulmonary cysts, pneumothorax and renal cell carcinoma. There is debate regarding whether colonic polyps should be added to the criteria. Previous risk estimates have mostly been based on small clinical case series. METHODS: A comprehensive review was conducted to identify studies that had recruited families carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in FLCN. Pedigree data were requested from these studies and pooled. Segregation analysis was used to estimate the cumulative risk of each manifestation for carriers of FLCN pathogenic variants. RESULTS: Our final dataset contained 204 families that were informative for at least one manifestation of BHD (67 families informative for skin manifestations, 63 for lung, 88 for renal carcinoma and 29 for polyps). By age 70 years, male carriers of the FLCN variant have an estimated 19% (95% CI 12% to 31%) risk of renal tumours, 87% (95% CI 80% to 92%) of lung involvement and 87% (95% CI 78% to 93%) of skin lesions, while female carriers had an estimated 21% (95% CI 13% to 32%) risk of renal tumours, 82% (95% CI 73% to 88%) of lung involvement and 78% (95% CI 67% to 85%) of skin lesions. The cumulative risk of colonic polyps by age 70 years old was 21% (95% CI 8% to 45%) for male carriers and 32% (95% CI 16% to 53%) for female carriers. CONCLUSIONS: These updated penetrance estimates, based on a large number of families, are important for the genetic counselling and clinical management of BHD syndrome.
Subject(s)
Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Colonic Polyps , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome/genetics , Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome/pathology , Penetrance , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/geneticsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of annual renal imaging surveillance (RIS) in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC). HLRCC is associated with a 21% risk to age 70 years of RCC. Presentations with advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) are associated with poor outcomes whereas RIS detects early-stage RCC; however, evidence for the cost-effectiveness of RIS is lacking. METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to compare, at different age starting points (11 years, 18 years, 40 years, 60 years), the costs and benefits of lifetime contrast-enhanced renal MRI surveillance (CERMRIS) vs no surveillance in HLRCC. Benefits were measured in life-years gained (LYG), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs in British Pounds Sterling (GBP). Net monetary benefit (NMB) was calculated using a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000/QALY. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic analyses were also performed. RESULTS: In the base-case 11-year age cohort, surveillance was cost-effective (Incremental_NMB=£3522 (95% CI -£2747 to £7652); Incremental_LYG=1.25 (95% CI 0.30 to 1.86); Incremental_QALYs=0.29 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.43)] at an additional mean discounted cost of £2185/patient (95% CI £430 to £4144). Surveillance was also cost-effective in other age cohorts and dominated a no surveillance strategy in the 40 year cohort [Incremental_NMB=£12 655 (95% CIs -£709 to £21 134); Incremental_LYG=1.52 (95% CI 0.30 to 2.26); Incremental_QALYs=0.58 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.87) with a cost saving of £965/patient (95% CI -£4202 to £2652). CONCLUSION: Annual CERMRI in HLRCC is cost-effective across age groups modelled.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Leiomyomatosis , Female , Humans , Aged , Child , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Leiomyomatosis/diagnosis , Leiomyomatosis/epidemiology , Leiomyomatosis/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Quality-Adjusted Life YearsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The incidence rate of malignant tumors after solid organ transplantation is higher than the normal population. The aim of our study is to identify the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after liver, kidney, heart and lung transplantation, respectively, and suggest that transplant patients can be screened early for tumors to avoid risk. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from their inception until August 16,2023. Retrospective and cohort studies which focus on the statistical data of standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of RCC after solid organ transplantation (SOT) more than one year have been included and extracted. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD4202022343633. RESULTS: Sixteen original studies have been included for meta-analysis. Liver transplantation could increase the risk of RCC (SIR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.53 to 0.93) with no heterogeneity(P = 0.594, I2 = 0.0%). And kidney transplantation could increase the risk of RCC(8.54, 6.68 to 10.40; 0.000,90.0%). Besides, heart and lung transplantation also could increase the risk of RCC(SIR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.53 to 0.93; SIR = 1.61, 95%CI:0.50 to 2.71). Moreover, significance could also be found in most subgroups, especially the European group and retrospective study group. What's more, after removing studies which have a greater impact on the overall outcome in RCC rate after kidney transplantation, heterogeneity did not solve and significant different was also observed in the European group (7.15, 5.49 to 8.81; 0.000, 78.6%). CONCLUSION: Liver, kidney, heart and lung transplantation patients have an increased risk of processing RCC compared to the general population and most subgroups, especially in geographic location of European subgroup, which suggested that patients should be screened frequently after transplantation.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/etiology , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer (BC) and Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are the most common urogenital cancers among both sexes, with a yearly global incidence of around 500 000 each. Both BC and RCC have been linked to diabetes. Poor glycemic control (malglycemia) is a serious consequence of diabetes and a possible consequence of systemic treatments used in BC and RCC. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of diabetes and use of hospital-based care for malglycemia in people with BC or RCC. METHODS: This Swedish retrospective population-based register study used national health-data registers for longitudinal data on cancer incidence covering 15 years, use of hospital-based health care, and filled prescriptions of outpatient medications. Study endpoints included co-prevalence of diabetes in individuals with BC/RCC, healthcare resource utilization due to malglycemia, use of systemic corticosteroids, and changes in diabetes management for people with concomitant type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: We identified 36,620 and 15,581 individuals diagnosed with BC and RCC, respectively, between 2006 and 2019. The proportion of individuals registered with diabetes was 24% in BC and 23% in RCC. An association between BC/RCC and poor glycemic control was found, although the number of malglycemic events in hospital-based care were few (65/59 per 1000 individuals with diabetes and BC/RCC respectively with at least one event). An earlier switch to insulin-based diabetes management was observed in BC/RCC compared to matched individuals with type 2 diabetes but no cancer. The results also indicated an association between steroid treatment and poor glycemic control, and that systemic corticosteroids were more common among people with BC/RCC compared to diabetes controls. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of diabetes and increased use of systemic corticosteroid treatment observed in this large national study highlights the need for specific clinical management, risk-assessment, and monitoring of individuals with BC/RCC and diabetes.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Glycemic Control , Hospitalization , Kidney Neoplasms , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Sweden/epidemiology , Male , Female , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Prevalence , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the second most common histology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), accounting for 10-15% of cases. Traditionally, pRCC is divided into type 1 and type 2, although this division is currently debated as a prognostic factor of survival. Our aim was to investigate the epidemiology and survival of the pRCC subtypes in a whole nation cohort of patients during a 50-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Population based retrospective study including consecutive cases of RCC in Iceland from 1971-2020. Comparisons were made between histological classifications of RCC, with emphasis on pRCC subtypes (type 1 vs. 2) for outcome estimation. Changes in RCC incidence were analyzed in 5-year intervals after age standardization. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used for outcome analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1.725 cases were identified, with 74.4%, 2.1% and 9.2% having clear cell (ccRCC), chromophobe (chRCC), and pRCC, respectively. The age standardized incidence (ASI) of pRCC was 1.97/100.000 for males and 0.5/100.000 for females, and the proportion of pRCC increased from 3.7% to 11.5% between the first and last intervals of the study (p < 0.001). Age standardized cancer specific mortality (ASCSM) of pRCC was 0.6/100.000 and 0.19/100.000 for males and females, respectively. The annual average increase in ASI was 3.6% for type 1 pRCC, but the ASI for type 2 pRCC and ASCSM for both subtypes did not change significantly. Male to female ratio was 4.4 for type 1 pRCC and 2.3 for type 2. The average tumor size for type 1 and 2 was 58.8 and 73.7 mm, respectively. Metastasis at diagnosis was found in 8.7% in the type 1 pRCC, compared to 30.0% of patients with type 2 pRCC (p < 0.001). Estimated 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) were 94.4%, 80.7%, and 69.3% for chRCC, pRCC and ccRCC, respectively (p < 0.001). For the pRCC subtypes, type 1 was associated with better 5-year CSS than type 2 (86.3% vs. 66.0%, p < 0.001), although this difference was not significant after adjusting for cancer stage and grading. CONCLUSIONS: pRCC histology was slightly less common in Iceland than in other countries. Males are more than three times more likely to be diagnosed with pRCC, compared to other RCC histologies. The subtype of pRCC was not found to be an independent risk factor for worse survival, and as suggested by the most recent WHO Classification of Urinary Tumors, grade and TNM-stage seem to be the most important factors for estimation of survival for pRCC patients.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Iceland/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/classification , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/classification , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Adult , Survival Rate , Incidence , Time Factors , Young Adult , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) has become the dominant treatment modality for cT1 renal tumor lesions. Tumors suspected of malignant potential are indicated for surgery, but some are histologically classified as benign lesions after surgery. This study aims to analyze the number of benign findings after PN according to definitive histology and to evaluate whether there is an association between malignant tumor findings and individual factors. METHODS: The retrospective study included 555 patients who underwent open or robotic-assisted PN for a tumor in our clinic from January 2013 to December 2020. The cohort was divided into groups according to definitive tumor histology (malignant tumors vs. benign lesions). The association of factors (age, sex, tumor size, R.E.N.A.L.) with the malignant potential of the tumor was further evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 462 tumors were malignant (83%) and 93 benign (17%). Of the malignant tumors, 66% were clear-cell RCC (renal cell carcinoma), 12% papillary RCC, and 6% chromophobe RCC. The most common benign tumor was oncocytoma in 10% of patients, angiomyolipoma in 2%, and papillary adenoma in 1%. In univariate analysis, there was a higher risk of malignant tumor in males (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.36-3.36, p = 0.001), a higher risk of malignancy in tumors larger than 20 mm (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.43-3.74, p < 0.001), and a higher risk of malignancy in tumors evaluated by R.E.N.A.L. as tumors of intermediate or high complexity (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.76-4.47, p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no association between older age and the risk of malignant renal tumor (p = 0.878). CONCLUSIONS: In this group, 17% of tumors had benign histology. Male sex, tumor size greater than 20 mm, and intermediate or high R.E.N.A.L. complexity were statistically significant predictors of malignant tumor findings.
Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms , Nephrectomy , Humans , Male , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Nephrectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Angiomyolipoma/pathology , Angiomyolipoma/surgery , Adult , Preoperative Period , Adenoma, Oxyphilic/pathology , Adenoma, Oxyphilic/surgeryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment modality for patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease. The long-term mortality of kidney recipients is 48-82% lower than that of patients on the waiting list. However, the risk of developing malignancies in these patients is twice as high as in the healthy population. Specifically, the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in transplant recipients is 10-30 times higher than in non-transplanted patients. The reason for the increased risk is poorly understood, but is most likely related to continuous immunosuppressive therapy. The problem of kidney graft neoplasia has not been adequately addressed in the medical literature. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of renal cell carcinoma in transplanted kidneys, enhance the efficacy of its treatment, and study the etiology of RCC development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of RCC incidence in kidney grafts was conducted in 3,270 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2013 and 2023. We evaluated the effectiveness of surgical interventions for these complications. Patients with histologically confirmed RCC of the transplanted kidney underwent genetic study to determine the etiology of the neoplasm. RESULTS: The incidence of RCC in transplanted kidneys was found to be 0.95% (n = 31), 28 patients underwent laparoscopic resection of the renal transplant tumor, 2 patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation of the tumor. Transplantectomy was performed in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection is an effective and safe method for the treatment of RCC in kidney transplants. Transplanted kidney cancer originates from the donor tissue. The clear cell variant of transplanted kidney cancer is a genetically determined disease.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Incidence , Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , LaparoscopyABSTRACT
In the United States, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) incidence and the prevalence of obesity, an established risk factor for RCC, have been increasing for several decades. RCC is more common among older individuals. We sought to quantify the contribution of excess adiposity to the rising incidence of RCC among individuals 60 years or older. National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study data (n = 453 859 participants, enrolled in 1995-1996, age at enrollment 50-71 years) were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for RCC across body mass index categories and HRs associated with smoking. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated using estimated HRs and annual overweight/obesity prevalence from the National Health Interview Survey (1985-2008). PAF estimates were combined with RCC incidence from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-13 to calculate annual percent changes in RCC incidence attributable (and unrelated) to overweight/obesity. We found that between 1995 and 2018, among individuals aged 60 years and older, PAF for overweight/obesity increased from 18% to 29% for all RCCs. In comparison, the PAF for smoking declined from 12% to 9%. RCC incidence increased 1.8% per year (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5%-2.1%) overall, while RCC incidence attributable to overweight/obesity increased 3.8% per year (95%CI 3.5%-4.2%) and RCC incidence unrelated to overweight/obesity increased 1.2% per year (95% CI 0.9%-1.4%). In conclusion, overweight/obesity appears to have contributed importantly to the rising incidence of RCC in the United States since the mid-1990s. Public health interventions focused on reducing overweight and obesity could help substantially in curbing this trend.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Overweight/complications , Overweight/epidemiology , Incidence , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/etiology , Body Mass IndexABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Body mass index (BMI) and kidney cancer mortality are inconsistently associated in the scientific literature. To understand how study design affects results, we contrasted associations between pre-diagnosis BMI and mortality under different analytic scenarios in a large, population-based prospective cohort study. METHODS: Using data from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study (1995-2011), we constructed two cohorts: a "full at-risk" cohort with no kidney cancer history at baseline (n = 252,845) and an "incident cancer" subset who developed kidney cancer during follow-up (n = 1,652). Cox Proportional Hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between pre-diagnosis BMI and mortality for different outcomes (all-cause and cancer-specific mortality), in the different cohorts (full at-risk vs. incident cancer cohort), and with different covariates (minimally vs. fully adjusted). For the incident cancer cohort, we also examined time to mortality using different timescales: from enrollment or diagnosis. RESULTS: In the full at-risk study population, higher pre-diagnosis BMI was associated with greater cancer-specific mortality in fully adjusted multivariable models, particularly for obese participants [HR, (95% CI): 1.76, (1.38-2.25)]. This association was less pronounced in the incident cancer cohort [1.50, (1.09-2.07)]. BMI was not strongly associated with all-cause mortality in either cohort in fully adjusted models [full cohort: 1.03, (1.01, 1.06); incident cancer cohort: 1.20, (0.97, 1.48)]. CONCLUSIONS: Populations characterized by high adult BMI will likely experience greater population burdens of mortality from kidney cancer, partially because of higher rates of kidney cancer diagnosis. Questions regarding overall mortality burden and post-diagnosis cancer survivorship are distinct and require different study designs.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Prospective Studies , Obesity Paradox , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Body Mass Index , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/complications , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/complications , Proportional Hazards ModelsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diet, alcohol, cigarette smoking, physical inactivity, and body mass index have been studied as risk factors for renal cell cancer (RCC). The joint effects of these lifestyle factors, captured as Healthy Lifestyle Index (HLI), were examined in one previous study. This study aims to investigate the association between HLI score and RCC risk in the prospective Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS). METHODS: A case-cohort analysis (3,767 subcohort members, 485 cases) was conducted using NLCS data (n = 120,852). Data on aforementioned risk factors was used to calculate HLI score, ranging 0-20, with higher scores reflecting healthier lifestyles. RCC occurrence was obtained by record linkage to cancer registries. Multivariable-adjusted proportional hazard models were used to calculate Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: Compared to participants in the unhealthiest HLI category, participants within the healthiest category had a lower RCC risk (HR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.56-1.10, p for trend 0.045). A standard deviation (± 3-unit) increase in HLI score was not statistically significantly associated with a lower RCC risk (HR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.83-1.01). This association was stronger after excluding diet or alcohol from the score, although confidence intervals overlap. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to a healthy lifestyle was weakly, though not statistically significantly, associated with a lower RCC risk.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Cohort Studies , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Netherlands/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Healthy Lifestyle , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ongoing research in the field of both localized, locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma has resulted in the availability of multiple treatment options. Hence, many questions are still unanswered and await further research. A nationwide collaborative registry allows to collect corresponding data. For this purpose, the Dutch PROspective Renal Cell Carcinoma cohort (PRO-RCC) has been founded, for the prospective collection of long-term clinical data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient reported experience measures (PREMs). METHODS: PRO-RCC is designed as a multicenter cohort for all Dutch patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Recruitment will start in the Netherlands in 2023. Importantly, participants may also consent to participation in a 'Trial within cohorts' studies (TwiCs). The TwiCs design provides a method to perform (randomized) interventional studies within the registry. The clinical data collection is embedded in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Next to the standardly available data on RCC, additional clinical data will be collected. PROMS entail Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), symptom monitoring with optional ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of pain and fatigue, and optional return to work- and/or nutrition questionnaires. PREMS entail satisfaction with care. Both PROMS and PREMS are collected through the PROFILES registry and are accessible for the patient and the treating physician. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethical board approval has been obtained (2021_218) and the study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05326620). DISCUSSION: PRO-RCC is a nationwide long-term cohort for the collection of real-world clinical data, PROMS and PREMS. By facilitating an infrastructure for the collection of prospective data on RCC, PRO-RCC will contribute to observational research in a real-world study population and prove effectiveness in daily clinical practice. The infrastructure of this cohort also enables that interventional studies can be conducted with the TwiCs design, without the disadvantages of classic RCTs such as slow patient accrual and risk of dropping out after randomization.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a preferred systemic treatment approach for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and thyroid carcinoma (TC), treatment-related cardiovascular (CV) toxicity is an important contributor to morbidity. However, the clinical risk assessment and impact of CV toxicities, including early significant hypertension, among real-world advanced cancer populations receiving VEGFR TKI therapies remain understudied. METHODS: In a multicenter, retrospective cohort study across 3 large and diverse US health systems, we characterized baseline hypertension and CV comorbidity in patients with RCC and those with TC who are newly initiating VEGFR TKI therapy. We also evaluated baseline patient-, treatment-, and disease-related factors associated with the risk for treatment-related early hypertension (within 6 weeks of TKI initiation) and major adverse CV events (MACE), accounting for the competing risk of death in an advanced cancer population, after VEGFR TKI initiation. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2020, 987 patients (80.3% with RCC, 19.7% with TC) initiated VEGFR TKI therapy. The baseline prevalence of hypertension was high (61.5% and 53.6% in patients with RCC and TC, respectively). Adverse CV events, including heart failure and cerebrovascular accident, were common (occurring in 14.9% of patients) and frequently occurred early (46.3% occurred within 1 year of VEGFR TKI initiation). Baseline hypertension and Black race were the primary clinical factors associated with increased acute hypertensive risk within 6 weeks of VEGFR TKI initiation. However, early significant "on-treatment" hypertension was not associated with MACE. CONCLUSIONS: These multicenter, real-world findings indicate that hypertensive and CV morbidities are highly prevalent among patients initiating VEGFR TKI therapies, and baseline hypertension and Black race represent the primary clinical factors associated with VEGFR TKI-related early significant hypertension. However, early on-treatment hypertension was not associated with MACE, and cancer-specific CV risk algorithms may be warranted for patients initiating VEGFR TKIs.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Hypertension , Kidney Neoplasms , Thyroid Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Blood Pressure , Retrospective Studies , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Thyroid Neoplasms/drug therapy , Thyroid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hypertension/chemically induced , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/drug therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The disparity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) risk and treatment outcome between males and females is well documented, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly elucidated. METHODS: We performed a narrative review synthesizing contemporary evidence on sex-specific molecular differences in healthy kidney tissue and RCC. RESULTS: In healthy kidney tissue, gene expression differs significantly between males and females, including autosomal and sex-chromosome-linked genes. The differences are most prominent for sex-chromosome-linked genes and attributable to Escape from X chromosome-linked inactivation and Y chromosome loss. The frequency distribution of RCC histologies varies between the sexes, particularly for papillary, chromophobe, and translocation RCC. In clear-cell and papillary RCC, sex-specific gene expressions are pronounced, and some of these genes are amenable to pharmacotherapy. However, for many, the impact on tumorigenesis remains poorly understood. In clear-cell RCC, molecular subtypes and gene expression pathways have distinct sex-specific trends, which also apply to the expression of genes implicated in tumor progression. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests meaningful genomic differences between male and female RCC, highlighting the need for sex-specific RCC research and personalized sex-specific treatment approaches.