Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 310
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Community Dent Health ; 32(1): 56-9, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26263594

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Medical literature lacks information about complaints against dentists who treat children. The present study aimed to evaluate the reports filed to Medical Consultant International (MCI) regarding paediatric dentistry in 1992-2011. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Most dentists in Israel (85%) are obliged by their professional liability insurance policy to report adverse events to MCI. Reports were analysed using a structured form that included demographic details of the treating dentist, patients and parents, type of treatment, the result and the dentist's attitude. MCI dental consultants' decisions were evaluated by two specialists in paediatric dentistry. RESULTS: The number of complaints per year is increasing. Complaints involved maltreatment (33%), case mismanagement (25%) and complications that required additional treatment (26%). Communication was problematic in 60% of cases. Only 16.7% of complaints developed into an actual lawsuit. Most complaints were against female general practitioners and against dentists who worked in community dental clinics located in peripheral areas. Treating permanent teeth increased to 3.6 times the probability of developing into a lawsuit. 59% of event records had missing data. Seventy-five percent of the cases rose from elective treatments while 25% concerned emergency treatments. One third of the cases required additional treatment in a hospital i.e. abscess drainage, foreign body swallowing or other physical damages. CONCLUSIONS: Better case selection and documentation, better training of dentists who treat children and more appropriate attitude toward patients and parents, are likely to reduce the number of complaints.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Children , Dentists , Dissent and Disputes , Adolescent , Attitude of Health Personnel , Child , Child, Preschool , Communication , Community Dentistry/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Care for Children/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Clinics/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Dentists/legislation & jurisprudence , Dentists/psychology , Dissent and Disputes/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , General Practice, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant , Insurance, Liability/legislation & jurisprudence , Israel , Male , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Selection , Pediatric Dentistry/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional-Family Relations , Risk Management , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Calif Dent Assoc ; 43(5): 245-9, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26798899

ABSTRACT

Electronic health record (EHR) solutions provide many potential benefits for dental practices, whether those programs run internally on a dental practice's computers or are cloud-based solutions. However, these programs also create new risks for a dental practice, which may be mitigated through due diligence and adequate contractual provisions to ensure protection for dentists. This article addresses the legal considerations associated with a dentist entering into a service contract with an EHR vendor.


Subject(s)
Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Electronic Health Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Practice Management, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , California , Computer Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer User Training/legislation & jurisprudence , Contract Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Informatics/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Risk Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Software/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
3.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 15(2): 223-8, 2014 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25095848

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess knowledge, attitudes and practices among the dental graduate in relation to healthcare ethics and law. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was employed using a self-administered questionnaire. A 15 item questionnaire about law and ethics was devised; tested and made available to all levels of graduates including teaching staff, postgraduates and intern at dental college in Bengaluru. A total of 116 graduates participated, with a response rate of 96.5% (n = 112). RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the participants said that they are legally bound to treat all the patients who approach them for the treatment. Nearly 32% of the participants have mentioned the various other reasons for the rejection apart from the reason like HIV+, poor patients and patients with the contagious disease. CONCLUSION: The study points to the need for appropriate training among graduates including the professional staffs and other graduates, and to devise means to sensitize them to issues of law and ethics in the workplace.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Dental Care/ethics , Dentists/psychology , Education, Dental , Ethics, Dental/education , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Dentists/ethics , Dentists/legislation & jurisprudence , Faculty, Dental , Female , Humans , India , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Internship and Residency , Male , Professional Practice/ethics , Professional Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Refusal to Treat/ethics , Refusal to Treat/legislation & jurisprudence
4.
Dent Update ; 41(2): 161-2, 164-6, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24783885

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: This paper offers some guidance on aspects of dento/medico-legal report writing, citing anonymized examples from the author's caseload for clarification of the points made, and also serves to illustrate that sometimes not everything is as straightforward as it may initially appear. It provides reference to the current Civil Procedure Rules in England and Wales and its relevance in report writing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To provide guidance on aspects of dento/medico-legal report writing.


Subject(s)
Expert Testimony , Forensic Dentistry , Writing , Chronology as Topic , Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Documentation , England , Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence , Forensic Dentistry/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Medical Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Physical Examination , Radiography, Dental , Research Report , Standard of Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Truth Disclosure , Wales
5.
Dent Update ; 41(4): 338-40, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24930255

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Clinical and ethical risk management requires not only the correct treatment being provided, and appropriate consent obtained, but also good records of that treatment. This third article of the series describes the characteristics of good records and their role in helping to prevent the progression of complaints, General Dental Council (GDC) cases and legal claims. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Good records are of fundamental importance in managing risk and preventing and resolving complaints and legal claims.


Subject(s)
Dental Records , Practice Management, Dental/organization & administration , Risk Management/methods , Appointments and Schedules , Consent Forms , Dental Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Care/organization & administration , Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Dentist-Patient Relations , Diagnosis, Oral , Dissent and Disputes/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical History Taking , Patient Care Planning , Physical Examination , Practice Management, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiography, Dental , Risk Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Treatment Refusal , United Kingdom
6.
Dent Assist ; 83(2): 22-3, 26-30, 32-4 passim, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24834675

ABSTRACT

Referred to as Standard of Care, the legal duty of a dentist requires exercising the degree of skill and care that would be exhibited by other prudent dentists faced with the same patient-care situation. Primarily, the goal of keeping good dental records is to maintain continuity of care. Diligent and complete documentation and charting procedures are essential to fulfilling the Standard of Care. Secondly, because dental records are considered legal documents they help protect the interest of the dentist and/or the patient by establishing the details of the services rendered. Patients today are better educated and more assertive than ever before and dentists must be equipped to protect themselves against malpractice claims. Every record component must be handled as if it could be summoned to a court room and scrutinized by an attorney, judge or jury. Complete, accurate, objective and honest entries in a patient record are the only way to defend against any clinical and/or legal problems that might arise. Most medical and dental malpractice claims arise from an unfavorable interaction with the dentist and not from a poor treatment outcome. By implementing the suggestions mentioned in this course, dental health care professionals can minimize the legal risks associated with the delivery of dental care to promote greater understanding for patients of their rights and privileges to their complete record.


Subject(s)
Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Consent Forms/legislation & jurisprudence , Continuity of Patient Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Records/classification , Documentation/standards , Forms and Records Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Ownership/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Standard of Care/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
9.
N Y State Dent J ; 79(4): 30-4, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24027895

ABSTRACT

Child abuse and neglect are prevalent issues that permeate all ethnic, cultural and socioeconomic segments of society. Parents of abused children frequently change physicians in order to prevent detection, but they are more likely to continue to visit the child's dentist. Most states recognize four major types of maltreatment: neglect; physical abuse; psychological maltreatment; and sexual abuse. The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry defines dental neglect as "the willful failure of parent or guardian to seek and follow through with treatment necessary to ensure a level of oral health essential for adequate function and freedom from pain and infection." The oral health practitioner must uphold his or her legal and ethical responsibility if there is suspicion, record and report the incidence. It may help save a child from further abuse.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse/diagnosis , Dentists , Bites, Human/diagnosis , Child , Child Abuse/classification , Child Abuse/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Abuse, Sexual/diagnosis , Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Dentists/ethics , Dentists/legislation & jurisprudence , Facial Injuries/diagnosis , Humans , Mandatory Reporting/ethics , Mental Health , Mouth/injuries , Tooth Injuries/diagnosis
10.
Eur J Dent Educ ; 16(1): e117-21, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22251334

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dental patient records should be of high quality, contain information to allow for good continuity of care and clinical defence (should the need ever arise) and, ideally, facilitate clinical audit. Handwritten dental records have been assessed for their compliance to statutory regulations, but the same cannot be levelled at computer-generated notes. This study aimed to compare and analyse the compliance of both methods of data recording with statutory regulations. METHOD: Fifty consecutive sets of handwritten notes and 50 sets of computer-generated notes were audited for compliance with a number of legal requirements and desirable characteristics for dental records and the results compared. The standard set for compliance with all characteristics was 100%. RESULTS: The computer-generated notes satisfied the set standard for 8 of the 11 legal requirements and three of six desirable characteristics. The handwritten notes satisfied the set standard for 1 of 11 legal requirements and none of the desirable characteristics. A statistical difference (using a 95% confidence interval) between the two methods was observed in 5 of 11 legal characteristics and three of six desirable characteristics, all of which were in favour of computer-generated notes. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, computer-generated notes achieved a much higher compliance rate with the set parameters, making defence in cases of litigation, continuity of care and clinical audit easier and more efficient.


Subject(s)
Computers , Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Records/standards , Forms and Records Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Forms and Records Control/standards , Writing , Confidence Intervals , Humans , Quality Control , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom
13.
SADJ ; 66(6): 262, 264-6, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23198473

ABSTRACT

The aim of this manuscript is to provide the South African dental profession with guidelines and recommendations on the safe and responsible clinical use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) equipment. Dental practitioners who prescribe and refer patients for CBCT examinations as well as those who operate CBCT systems and interpret the images, share responsibility for the use of CBCT systems. Applicable information pertaining to the current status of the use of CBCT was reviewed, and the Directorate of Radiation Control of the Department of Health, South Africa, was invited to participate in the development of evidence-based guidelines on the safe use of cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. These guidelines establish a basis for discussions that are likely to lead to legislation.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Patient Safety , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiography, Dental/methods , Age Factors , Child , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/standards , Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Evidence-Based Dentistry , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Needs Assessment , Patient Care Planning , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Radiography, Dental/standards , South Africa , Standard of Care/legislation & jurisprudence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL