ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Epidemiologic and murine studies suggest that dietary emulsifiers promote development of diseases associated with microbiota dysbiosis. Although the detrimental impact of these compounds on the intestinal microbiota and intestinal health have been demonstrated in animal and in vitro models, impact of these food additives in healthy humans remains poorly characterized. METHODS: To examine this notion in humans, we performed a double-blind controlled-feeding study of the ubiquitous synthetic emulsifier carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) in which healthy adults consumed only emulsifier-free diets (n = 9) or an identical diet enriched with 15 g per day of CMC (n = 7) for 11 days. RESULTS: Relative to control subjects, CMC consumption modestly increased postprandial abdominal discomfort and perturbed gut microbiota composition in a way that reduced its diversity. Moreover, CMC-fed subjects exhibited changes in the fecal metabolome, particularly reductions in short-chain fatty acids and free amino acids. Furthermore, we identified 2 subjects consuming CMC who exhibited increased microbiota encroachment into the normally sterile inner mucus layer, a central feature of gut inflammation, as well as stark alterations in microbiota composition. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the notion that the broad use of CMC in processed foods may be contributing to increased prevalence of an array of chronic inflammatory diseases by altering the gut microbiome and metabolome (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03440229).
Subject(s)
Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/adverse effects , Diet/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Metabolome/drug effects , Animals , Double-Blind Method , Dysbiosis/etiology , Feces , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , MiceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO) is a sorbitan fatty acid ester, an emulsifier used in topical products and certain patch test preparations. SSO may affect the patch test results. It has been debated whether to include the substance in the baseline series to avoid misinterpretation of the results. OBJECTIVES: To report the prevalence and simultaneous reactions of SSO with other patch test preparations containing SSO as an emulsifier. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 3539 dermatitis patients who underwent patch testing from 2016 to 2020 was performed. RESULTS: The 5-year SSO contact allergy prevalence was 0.48%, and 1.3% had a doubtful reaction. Patients with a stronger positive reaction (2+, 3+) were more likely to react simultaneously to other allergen preparations containing SSO (p value = 0.018). One patient with a strong reaction to SSO reacted positively to all SSO-containing patch test preparations. Definite fragrance allergens could not be identified in the patients who had simultaneous reactions to SSO and fragrance mix (FM) I. CONCLUSIONS: Patch testing with allergen preparations containing SSO affected the patch test interpretation. Fragrance contact allergy could not be ruled out when a patient simultaneously reacted to SSO and FM I. Changing emulsifiers in patch test preparations would be advantageous.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Perfume , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Patch Tests/methods , Retrospective Studies , Test Taking Skills , Allergens/adverse effects , Perfume/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Food additives in general, and emulsifiers in particular, are considered to be important dietary components with a potential to harm the intestine, in part by promoting intestinal inflammation. There is inadequate objective information about the specific nature and the magnitude of the problem.The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recognized approximately 450 items added to our foods as being generally regarded as safe and has placed them on a generally regarded as safe (GRAS) list. Additionally, it has also approved approximately 3000 "food additives." There is a general lack of transparency as to how either of these selections were and continue to be made. Once items are officially designated by the FDA as "food additives" or placed on the GRAS list, there is no regulatory mechanism for the ongoing monitoring of their safety.The most widely used emulsifier is "lecithin," which is biochemically identified as phosphatidylcholine (PC). Regulatory guidelines allow manufacturers to use the label "lecithin" to be applied to emulsifiers that contain PC plus other phospholipids in a variety of unspecified concentrations. The PC used in experiments cited in the literature, is unlikely to be the same thing as the "lecithin" in our diets.The objective of this introduction to emulsifiers is to raise awareness of the current state of food additives in the USA and to encourage thoughtful approaches to the study of all additives found in our diets. The overriding goal should be to assure the safety of what we eat. As examples we discuss eight widely distributed food additives; four "natural" emulsifiers that are classified as GRAS as well as an additional emulsifier-associated food additive that is also on the GRAS list, and three synthetic emulsifying agents that are FDA approved as "food additives."
Subject(s)
Emulsifying Agents , Food Additives , Diet , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Food Additives/adverse effects , Humans , Intestines , United States , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
The intestinal tract is inhabited by a large and diverse community of microbes collectively referred to as the gut microbiota. While the gut microbiota provides important benefits to its host, especially in metabolism and immune development, disturbance of the microbiota-host relationship is associated with numerous chronic inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease and the group of obesity-associated diseases collectively referred to as metabolic syndrome. A primary means by which the intestine is protected from its microbiota is via multi-layered mucus structures that cover the intestinal surface, thereby allowing the vast majority of gut bacteria to be kept at a safe distance from epithelial cells that line the intestine. Thus, agents that disrupt mucus-bacterial interactions might have the potential to promote diseases associated with gut inflammation. Consequently, it has been hypothesized that emulsifiers, detergent-like molecules that are a ubiquitous component of processed foods and that can increase bacterial translocation across epithelia in vitro, might be promoting the increase in inflammatory bowel disease observed since the mid-twentieth century. Here we report that, in mice, relatively low concentrations of two commonly used emulsifiers, namely carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate-80, induced low-grade inflammation and obesity/metabolic syndrome in wild-type hosts and promoted robust colitis in mice predisposed to this disorder. Emulsifier-induced metabolic syndrome was associated with microbiota encroachment, altered species composition and increased pro-inflammatory potential. Use of germ-free mice and faecal transplants indicated that such changes in microbiota were necessary and sufficient for both low-grade inflammation and metabolic syndrome. These results support the emerging concept that perturbed host-microbiota interactions resulting in low-grade inflammation can promote adiposity and its associated metabolic effects. Moreover, they suggest that the broad use of emulsifying agents might be contributing to an increased societal incidence of obesity/metabolic syndrome and other chronic inflammatory diseases.
Subject(s)
Colitis/chemically induced , Colitis/microbiology , Diet/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Tract/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Metabolic Syndrome/chemically induced , Metabolic Syndrome/microbiology , Adiposity/drug effects , Animals , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/administration & dosage , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/adverse effects , Colitis/pathology , Emulsifying Agents/administration & dosage , Feces/microbiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Germ-Free Life , Inflammation/chemically induced , Inflammation/microbiology , Inflammation/pathology , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/microbiology , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/pathology , Mice , Microbiota/drug effects , Obesity/chemically induced , Obesity/microbiology , Obesity/pathology , Polysorbates/administration & dosage , Polysorbates/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is considerable variability across European patch test centres as to which allergens are included in local and national cosmetics series. OBJECTIVES: To propose a standardized, evidence-based cosmetic series for Europe based on up-to-date analysis of relevant contact allergens. METHODS: We collated data from the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) from 2009 to 2018 to determine which cosmetic allergens produce a high yield of contact allergy. Contact allergens with a prevalence of >0.3% that were considered relevant were included. Rare contact allergens were excluded if deemed no longer relevant or added to a supplemental cosmetic series for further analysis. RESULTS: Sensitization prevalences of 39 cosmetic contact allergens were tabulated. Thirty of these allergens yielded >0.3% positive reactions and are therefore included in our proposed European cosmetic series. Six were considered no longer relevant and therefore excluded. Three were included in a supplementary European cosmetic series. An additional nine allergens were included in either the core or supplemental European cosmetic series following literature review. CONCLUSION: We have derived a potential European cosmetic series based upon the above methods. This will require ongoing investigation based upon the changing exposure profiles of cosmetic allergens as well as new and evolving substances.
Subject(s)
Cosmetics/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Patch Tests/methods , Patch Tests/standards , Allergens/administration & dosage , Allergens/adverse effects , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Antioxidants/adverse effects , Cosmetics/chemistry , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Emollients/administration & dosage , Emollients/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/administration & dosage , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Population Surveillance , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/administration & dosage , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , PrevalenceABSTRACT
Inflammation is a well-characterized critical driver of gastrointestinal cancers. Previous findings have shown that intestinal low-grade inflammation can be promoted by the consumption of select dietary emulsifiers, ubiquitous component of processed foods which alter the composition and function of the gut microbiota. Using a model of colitis-associated cancer, we previously reported that consumption of the dietary emulsifiers carboxymethylcellulose or polysorbate-80 exacerbated colonic tumor development. Here, we investigate the impact of dietary emulsifiers consumption on cancer initiation and progression in a genetical model of intestinal adenomas. In APCmin mice, we observed that dietary emulsifiers consumption enhanced small-intestine tumor development in a way that appeared to be independent of chronic intestinal inflammation but rather associated with emulsifiers' impact on the proliferative status of the intestinal epithelium as well as on intestinal microbiota composition in both male and female mice. Overall, our findings further support the hypothesis that emulsifier consumption may be a new modifiable risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) and that alterations in host-microbiota interactions can favor gastrointestinal carcinogenesis in individuals with a genetical predisposition to such disorders.
Subject(s)
Adenoma/chemically induced , Colorectal Neoplasms/chemically induced , Diet/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Tract/drug effects , Intestines/drug effects , Animals , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/chemistry , Carcinogenesis/chemically induced , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Female , Food Additives/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Inflammation/chemically induced , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Polysorbates/chemistryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Dietary emulsifiers are widely used in processed foods and officially approved as safe for intake. However, recent studies have demonstrated that some emulsifiers alter the colonic microbiota, leading to colonic low-grade inflammation, in mice. The effect of dietary emulsifiers on small-intestinal microbiota, which is important for gut immunity, has not been studied. We aimed to investigate the effect of a representative dietary emulsifier, polysorbate-80 (P80), on the small-intestinal microbiota in normal mice. METHODS: Some mice were pretreated with P80 for 8 weeks with or without indomethacin administration on the last 2 days, and intestinal damage was evaluated histologically. The ileal and colonic microbiota composition was assessed using 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Polysorbate-80 increased the Gammaproteobacteria abundance and decreased the α-diversity in the small intestine. No decrease in α-diversity was observed in the colon. P80 pretreatment exacerbated the indomethacin-induced small-intestinal lesions and significantly increased the interleukin-1ß expression. Culture of ileal content on deoxycholate hydrogen sulfide lactose agar showed that P80 significantly increased the colonies of the sulfide-producing bacteria Proteus spp. (genetically identified as Proteus mirabilis). Antibiotic pretreatment abolished the P80-induced aggravation of indomethacin-induced ileitis. Motility assay in semisolid agar showed that adding 0.02% P80 to the agar significantly increased the diameter of P. mirabilis colonies but not that of Escherichia coli colonies. CONCLUSIONS: Polysorbate-80 enhances the vulnerability of the small intestine to indomethacin-induced injury by inducing ileal dysbiosis. Direct enhancement of the motility of specific flagellated microbiota by P80 might be related to dysbiosis and intestinal injury.
Subject(s)
Dysbiosis , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Indomethacin/adverse effects , Intestine, Small/drug effects , Intestine, Small/microbiology , Polysorbates/adverse effects , Animals , Humans , MiceABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss the implications of the increased prevalence of emulsifiers in processed foods in daily consumption, the links to obesity both in mice and in vitro studies, and how those findings correlate with humans. RECENT FINDINGS: There is rising interest in understanding the contributors to the obesity epidemic. One potential component recently studied has been the consumption of processed foods causing inflammatory changes leading to metabolic syndrome. This phenomenon has been shown in several mice and in vitro studies with changes in microbiome composition, elevated fasting blood glucose, hyperphagia, increased weight gain and adiposity, hepatic steatosis increased inflammatory markers, and a correlation with increased incidence of colorectal cancer. Emulsifiers are found in most foods consumed in the US population, which has increased over the years. This review focuses on understanding the initial approved safe levels of emulsifier consumption, the preceding increased use in foods with higher daily consumption than was previously tested, measuring these levels in animal models, and the positive association with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Future research will require prospectively studying emulsifier consumption more accurately along with the associated respective changes in the microbiome to determine the relationship to obesity.
Subject(s)
Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Fast Foods/adverse effects , Food Additives/adverse effects , Obesity/etiology , Emulsifying Agents/analysis , Emulsifying Agents/pharmacology , Fast Foods/analysis , Food Additives/analysis , Food Additives/pharmacology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Humans , Obesity/microbiologyABSTRACT
Positive reactions to fragrance mix I (FM I) are frequent in consecutively patch tested patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis. However, the FM I test preparations contain 5% of the emulsifier sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO), and it is well known that SSO can cause contact allergic reactions in its own right. Indeed, the available data show that some patients with contact allergy to SSO react to FM I but are not allergic to fragrances. When SSO is not tested, this situation may go unnoticed, a wrong diagnosis of fragrance allergy may be given to the patient, and unjustified advice to avoid fragrances and fragranced products will be given in such cases. To avoid such suboptimal patient care, we postulate that testing with SSO in all patch tested individuals is mandatory. As it is well known that only a minority of FM I-reactive patients will undergo a breakdown test with the ingredients and SSO, testing with SSO in all patients can only be achieved by adding it to the European baseline series. Not testing with SSO may also result in misinterpretation of patch test reactions to Myroxylon pereirae resin and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in the baseline series, as both (may) contain SSO, and, for the same reason, of reactions to several other hapten test materials.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Hexoses/adverse effects , Patch Tests/methods , Europe , Humans , Perfume/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cellulite is an irregular alteration of the skin surface giving it cottage cheese appearance. Carboxytherapy is transcutaneous infusion of carbon dioxide into the affected site. Mesolipolysis aims to remove cellulite and improve skin texture. AIMS: To verify the efficacy and safety of carboxytherapy versus mesolipolysis using phosphatidylcholine (PPC) in treatment of cellulite in thighs area. METHODS: Forty-eight female patients with different grades of cellulite at thighs area were enrolled in this study. They were classified into two groups: group A received subcutaneous infusion of carboxytherapy, and group B was treated with mesolipolysis using PPC. Each group received six sessions at weekly intervals. sessions. The outcome measures and clinical assessment were based on cellulite grading scale and thigh circumference measurements. Standardized digital photography was taken before and after treatment. Patients were followed up for 6 months. RESULTS: After treatment, there was significant reduction in thigh circumference measurement p < 0.01 and cellulite grading scale p < 0.001 in both groups. The difference in cellulite grading scale and thigh circumference measurement in both groups was insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Carboxytherapy and mesolipolysis are safe and effective in cellulite treatment. Carboxytherapy is a promising alternative therapeutic modality for cellulite treatment.
Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide/therapeutic use , Cellulite/therapy , Cosmetic Techniques , Emulsifying Agents/therapeutic use , Phosphatidylcholines/therapeutic use , Thigh/pathology , Adult , Carbon Dioxide/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Organ Size , Phosphatidylcholines/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Young AdultABSTRACT
Saussurea lappa (SL) has been reported for its antioxidant and anti-ageing properties. Due to this reason it can be incorporated in a stable phytoformulations for cosmetic use. The objective of the study was to evaluate the anti-aging potential of cosmetic o/w emulsion containing the botanical extract of SL. An emulsion (o/w) was prepared using TEGO® Care 450 (Polyglceryl-3-Methyl Glucose Distearate) emulsifier and final emulsion was loaded with 4 % extract of SL in aqueous phase. This emulsion evaluated for its antioxidant and anti-ageing properties on healthy human subjects using a non-invasive technique called surface evaluation of living skin (SELS). The formulation containing SL extract showed significant (p<0.05) changes in Skin roughness (SEr) as -3.13%, -6.26%, -9.39%; Skin Scaliness (SEsc) as - 4.19%, -8.39%, -12.58%; Skin wrinkles (SEw) as -0.5%, -1.08%, -1.63%; and Skin smoothness (SEsm) as 3.28%, 6.57%, 9.85%, respectively, after 30, 60 and 90 days of continous use. Topical application of the cosmetic cream containing SL extract exerts have a significant anti-aging effects, perhaps due to the presence of Kaempferol, gallic acid, Caffeic acid and other essential phenolics.
Subject(s)
Emulsifying Agents/administration & dosage , Phytochemicals/administration & dosage , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Saussurea/chemistry , Skin Aging/drug effects , Skin Cream/administration & dosage , Skin/drug effects , Stearates/administration & dosage , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Emulsions , Humans , Male , Pakistan , Phytochemicals/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/isolation & purification , Plant Roots/chemistry , Single-Blind Method , Skin/pathology , Skin Cream/adverse effects , Stearates/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory T cell-mediated skin disease, affecting about 2% of Hungarian population. Genetic predisposition as well as environmental triggering factors, and innate immune processes play a role in its etiology. Treatment of psoriasis during the initial stages and first years of disease tend to be conservative and frequently based on topical agents. The aim of this study was to investigate and to describe the efficacy and safety of Dr Michaels® (Soratinex®) skin-care products for the topical treatment of stable chronic plaque psoriasis in a Hungarian population. Two-hundred-and-eight-six (120 female/166 male) patients, aged 10-80 years old (mean age 43 years) with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis had participated in the study. The products, including cleansing gel containing a coal tar solution, herbal oils and emulsifiers, were used twice daily and in the same manner for all the skin lesions. The study period was eight weeks. Assessment, using the Psoriasis Activity Severity Index (PASI) scores and photographic analysis, was done 2 weeks before treatment, at time 0, and after 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. Patients improvement was determined by the percentage reduction of the PASI scores. Side effects and tolerability were also evaluated. After 8 weeks treatment course, 46 patients had a moderate improvement, with the regression of 25-50% of skin lesions; 77 patients showed a good improvement, with the resolution of 51-75% of lesions. Another 115 patients had an outstanding improvement, with the regression of 76-98.9% of lesions. Only 13 patients did not achieve an improvement of psoriasis. Fifteen patients experienced folliculitis, which resolved after cessation of treatment. Seven patients worsened and discontinued treatment. Thirteen patients dropped out because of non-compliance. Our investigation demonstrates that Dr Michaels® (Soratinex®) products, an Australian treatment, can be used successfully in the treatment of stable chronic plaque psoriasis.
Subject(s)
Psoriasis/drug therapy , Skin Care/methods , Administration, Topical , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Coal Tar/administration & dosage , Coal Tar/adverse effects , Coal Tar/therapeutic use , Czech Republic , Emulsifying Agents/administration & dosage , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hungary , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Oils/administration & dosage , Plant Oils/adverse effects , Plant Oils/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/pathology , Skin Care/adverse effects , Slovakia , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO) has been added to fragrance mix I (FM I) as an emulsifier since the 1990s. Being a contact allergen itself, SSO has the potential to cause false-positive reactions to FM I. Recent results obtained with selected FM I-positive patients have shown that 5% have concomitant positive reactions to SSO. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the 5-year prevalence of contact allergy to SSO and evaluate the importance of SSO allergy when patch test results for FM I are interpreted. METHODS: This was a retrospective database study of consecutively patch tested eczema patients (n = 4,637) from 2010 to 2014. All patients were tested with our baseline series including FM I and SSO 20% in pet. RESULTS: Sensitization to SSO was identified in 9 (0.2%) patients. The proportion of FM I-positive patients with concomitant positive reactions to SSO was 1.4%. CONCLUSIONS: SSO is a rare cause of contact allergy, with a 5-year prevalence of 0.2% in consecutively tested patients. Contact allergy to the emulsifier does not play a major role when the overall frequency of contact allergy to FM I is evaluated. However, to correctly diagnose individual patients, concomitant patch testing with FM I and SSO is encouraged.
Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Hexoses/adverse effects , Perfume/adverse effects , Adult , Databases, Factual , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Patch Tests , Retrospective StudiesSubject(s)
Acrylates/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Gels/adverse effects , Ultrasonography , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Acrylates/analysis , Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/analysis , Female , Gels/chemistry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patch Tests , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/analysis , Urea/adverse effects , Urea/analysisABSTRACT
The addition of chemical additives to consumer cosmetic products is a common practice to increase cosmetic effectiveness, maintain cosmetic efficacy, and produce a longer-lasting, more viable product. Recently, manufacturers have come under attack for the addition of chemicals including dioxane, formaldehyde, lead/lead acetate, parabens, and phthalate, as these additives may prove harmful to consumer health. Although reports show that these products may indeed adversely affect human health, these studies are conducted using levels of the aforementioned chemicals at much higher levels of exposure than those found in cosmetic products. When cosmeceuticals are used as per manufacturer's instructions, it is estimated that the levels of harmful additives found in these products are considerably lower than reported toxic concentrations.
Subject(s)
Cosmetics/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , Animals , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/chemistry , Cosmetics/standards , Dioxanes/adverse effects , Emulsifying Agents/chemistry , Emulsifying Agents/standards , Formaldehyde/adverse effects , Humans , Organometallic Compounds/adverse effects , Parabens/adverse effects , Phthalic Acids/adverse effects , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/chemistry , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/standards , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
With the advent of industrialization, there has been a substantial increase in the production and consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs). These processed foods often contain artificially synthesized additives, such as emulsifiers. Emulsifiers constitute approximately half of the total amount of food additives, with Tween 80 being a commonly used emulsifier in the food industry. Concurrently, China is undergoing significant demographic changes, transitioning into an aging society. Despite this demographic shift, there is insufficient research on the health implications of food emulsifiers, particularly on the elderly population. In this study, we present novel findings indicating that even at low concentrations, Tween 80 suppressed the viability of multiple cell types. Prolonged in vivo exposure to 1 % Tween 80 in drinking water induced liver lipid accumulation and insulin resistance in young adult mice under a regular chow diet. Intriguingly, in mice with high-fat diet (HFD) induced metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), this inductive effect was masked. In aged mice, liver lipid accumulation was replicated under prolonged Tween 80 exposure. We further revealed that Tween 80 induced inflammation in both adult and aged mice, with a more pronounced inflammation in aged mice. In conclusion, our study provides compelling evidence that Tween 80 could contribute to a low-grade inflammation and liver lipid accumulation. These findings underscore the need for increasing attention regarding the consumption of UPFs with Tween 80 as the emulsifier, particularly in the elderly consumers.
Subject(s)
Fatty Liver , Polysorbates , Humans , Aged , Young Adult , Animals , Mice , Polysorbates/adverse effects , Diet, High-Fat , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Inflammation , LipidsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Emulsifiers are implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Few studies have examined emulsifier intake in people with existing IBD. We aimed to describe the frequency of exposure to 6 selected emulsifiers in a contemporary cohort of people with IBD and compare intake with healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: Baseline food records from participants in an Australian prospective cohort study examining the microbiome of IBD patients and HCs were analyzed. Exposure to inflammatory emulsifiers polysorbate-80 (P80); carboxymethylcellulose (CMC); carrageenan; xanthan gum (XG); lecithin (soy and sunflower) and mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids (MDGs) were determined by examining ingredient lists. Frequency of emulsifier exposure between groups (IBD vs HC, Crohn's disease [CD] vs ulcerative colitis [UC], IBD children vs adults, active disease vs remission) was examined after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Records from 367 participants were analyzed (nâ =â 176 IBD, of which there were 101 CD, 75 UC, and 191 HC patients). In total, 5022 unique food items were examined, with 18% containing 1 or more emulsifier of interest. Inflammatory bowel disease participants had significantly higher total daily emulsifier exposure compared with HCs (2.7â ±â 1.8 vs 2.3â ±â 1.6, Pâ =â .02). In IBD participants, emulsifiers with the highest daily exposure were MDGs (1.2â ±â 0.93), lecithin (0.85â ±â 0.93), and XG (0.38â ±â 0.42). There were no recorded exposures to P80. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory bowel disease participants were exposed to more emulsifiers than HCs. Intake of inflammatory emulsifiers were low or nonexistent, suggesting their presence in the food supply are not as common as frequently stated.
Subject(s)
Emulsifying Agents , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Polysorbates , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Middle Aged , Australia/epidemiology , Polysorbates/adverse effects , Child , Colitis, Ulcerative , Adolescent , Young Adult , Crohn Disease , Lecithins , Polysaccharides, Bacterial , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/adverse effects , Aged , Dietary Exposure/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Experimental studies have suggested potential detrimental effects of emulsifiers on gut microbiota, inflammation, and metabolic perturbations. We aimed to investigate the associations between exposures to food additive emulsifiers and the risk of type 2 diabetes in a large prospective cohort of French adults. METHODS: We analysed data from 104â139 adults enrolled in the French NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort study from May 1, 2009, to April 26, 2023; 82â456 (79·2%) were female and the mean age was 42·7 years (SD 14·5). Dietary intakes were assessed with three 24 h dietary records collected over three non-consecutive days, every 6 months. Exposure to additive emulsifiers was evaluated through multiple food composition databases and ad-hoc laboratory assays. Associations between cumulative time-dependent exposures to food additive emulsifiers and the risk of type 2 diabetes were characterised with multivariable proportional hazards Cox models adjusted for known risk factors. The NutriNet-Santé study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03335644). FINDINGS: Of 104â139 participants, 1056 were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes during follow-up (mean follow-up duration 6·8 years [SD 3·7]). Intakes of the following emulsifiers were associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes: total carrageenans (hazard ratio [HR] 1·03 [95% CI 1·01-1·05] per increment of 100 mg per day, p<0·0001), carrageenans gum (E407; HR 1·03 [1·01-1·05] per increment of 100 mg per day, p<0·0001), tripotassium phosphate (E340; HR 1·15 [1·02-1·31] per increment of 500 mg per day, p=0·023), acetyl tartaric acid esters of monoglycerides and diglycerides of fatty acids (E472e; HR 1·04 [1·00-1·08] per increment of 100 mg per day, p=0·042), sodium citrate (E331; HR 1·04 [1·01-1·07] per increment of 500 mg per day, p=0·0080), guar gum (E412; HR 1·11 [1·06-1·17] per increment of 500 mg per day, p<0·0001), gum arabic (E414; HR 1·03 [1·01-1·05] per increment of 1000 mg per day, p=0·013), and xanthan gum (E415, HR 1·08 [1·02-1·14] per increment of 500 mg per day, p=0·013). INTERPRETATION: We found direct associations between the risk of type 2 diabetes and exposures to various food additive emulsifiers widely used in industrial foods, in a large prospective cohort of French adults. Further research is needed to prompt re-evaluation of regulations governing the use of additive emulsifiers in the food industry for better consumer protection. FUNDING: European Research Council, French National Cancer Institute, French Ministry of Health, IdEx Université de Paris, and Bettencourt-Schueller Foundation.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Emulsifying Agents , Food Additives , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/chemically induced , Female , Male , Adult , Prospective Studies , Food Additives/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Emulsifying Agents/adverse effects , Risk Factors , France/epidemiology , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We report the case of a girl presenting acute allergic contact dermatitis due to methoxy PEG 22 dodecyl glycol contained in Mustela Cold Cream Nutriprotecteur®. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 6-year-old girl was referred with acute eczema of the face occurring within 12h of applying a new moisturizing cream, Mustela Cold Cream Nutriprotecteur®. Patch tests were performed on the upper back using the Finn Chamber technique with the European standard series and the patient's own cream. Readings were performed after 2 days and the sole positive ++ reaction was associated with Mustela Cold Cream®. Additional patch testing was carried out with the ingredients of the cream, with the sole positive ++ reaction again being to methoxy PEG 22 dodecyl glycol copolymer. The other ingredients were negative. DISCUSSION: Methoxy PEG 22 dodecyl glycol is a copolymer used in cosmetics as an emulsion stabilizer and viscosity-increasing agent. It is found in 20 cosmetics currently on the market, most of which are prescribed for children. CONCLUSION: Although it is rare, doctors must be aware of allergic contact dermatitis due to methoxy PEG 22 dodecyl glycol because of the extent of clinical reactions and because it chiefly affects the paediatric population.