ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is released from the airway epithelium in response to various environmental triggers, inducing a type-2 inflammatory response, and is associated with airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and exacerbations. TSLP may also induce AHR via a direct effect on airway smooth muscle and mast cells, independently of type-2 inflammation, although association between airway TSLP and AHR across asthma phenotypes has been described sparsely. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the association between AHR and levels of TSLP in serum, sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with asthma with and without type-2 inflammation. METHODS: A novel ultrasensitive assay was used to measure levels of TSLP in patients with asthma (serum, n = 182; sputum, n = 81; bronchoalveolar lavage, n = 85) and healthy controls (serum, n = 47). The distribution and association among airway and systemic TSLP, measures of AHR, type-2 inflammation, and severity of disease were assessed. RESULTS: TSLP in sputum was associated with AHR independently of levels of eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (ρ = 0.49, P = .005). Serum TSLP was higher in both eosinophil-high and eosinophil-low asthma compared to healthy controls: geometric mean: 1600 fg/mL (95% CI: 1468-1744 fg/mL) and 1294 fg/mL (95% CI: 1167-1435 fg/mL) versus 846 fg/mL (95% CI: 661-1082 fg/mL), but did not correlate with the level of AHR. Increasing age, male sex, and eosinophils in blood were associated with higher levels of TSLP in serum, whereas lung function, inhaled corticosteroid dose, and symptom score were not. CONCLUSIONS: The association between TSLP in sputum and AHR to mannitol irrespective of markers of type-2 inflammation further supports a role of TSLP in AHR that is partially independent of eosinophilic inflammation.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Eosinophilia , Inflammation , Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin , Humans , Male , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/metabolism , Cytokines , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/metabolism , Eosinophils , Inflammation/diagnosis , Inflammation/metabolism , Sputum , Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin/metabolismABSTRACT
Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are a group of diseases characterized by selective eosinophil infiltration of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in the absence of other causes of eosinophilia. These diseases are generally driven by type 2 inflammation, often in response to food allergen exposure. Among all EGIDs, the clinical presentation often includes a history of atopic disease with a variety of GI symptoms. EGIDs are traditionally separated into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs. EoE is relatively better understood and now associated with clinical guidelines and 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments, whereas non-EoE EGIDs are rarer and less well-understood diseases without US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments. Non-EoE EGIDs are further subclassified by the area of the GI tract that is involved; they comprise eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic enteritis (including eosinophilic duodenitis), and eosinophilic colitis. As with other GI disorders, the disease presentations and mechanisms differ depending on the involved segment of the GI tract; however, the differences between EoE and non-EoE EGIDs extend beyond which GI tract segment is involved. The aim of this article is to summarize the commonalities and differences between the clinical presentations and disease mechanisms for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs.
Subject(s)
Enteritis , Eosinophilia , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Gastritis , Humans , Eosinophilia/immunology , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/pathology , Enteritis/diagnosis , Enteritis/immunology , Enteritis/pathology , Gastritis/diagnosis , Gastritis/immunology , Gastritis/pathology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Animals , Eosinophils/immunology , Eosinophils/pathology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/immunology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review seeks to understand novel avenues for eosinophilic GI disease management. Biomarkers offer a unique and non-invasive approach to tracking EoE disease progression. While no biomarkers have definitively met the diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic GI diseases, some biomarkers have been shown to be associated with disease activity. Here, we examine the potential of recently studied biomarkers. RECENT FINDINGS: Current research shows advancements in blood, luminal fluid, and breath testing. Particular areas of interest include mRNA analyses, protein fingerprinting, amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), T cells and IgE receptors, eosinophilic cationic proteins, cytokines, and nitric oxide exhalation. Preliminary results showed that mucosal biomarkers, directly captured from the esophagus, may reflect the best representation of biopsy-based results, in contrast to biomarkers obtained from indirect or peripheral (blood, breath) methods. However, this is based on limited clinical studies without sufficient numbers to evaluate true diagnostic accuracy. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to fully ascertain both the optimal sampling technique and the specific biomarkers that reflect diagnostic status of the disease.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Eosinophilia , Humans , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/immunology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Breath Tests/methods , Gastritis/diagnosis , Gastritis/immunology , Enteritis/diagnosis , Enteritis/immunologyABSTRACT
Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. The differential diagnosis includes other cutaneous adverse reactions, infections, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and neoplastic disorders. Three sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed; however, consensus is lacking. The cornerstone of management is immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug culprit. Systemic corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, but the literature on steroid-sparing agents is expanding. Longitudinal evaluation for sequelae is recommended. Adjunctive tests for risk stratification and drug culprit identification remain under investigation. Part II of this continuing medical education activity begins by exploring the differential diagnosis and diagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and concludes with an evidence-based overview of evaluation and treatment.
Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome , Eosinophilia , Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/therapy , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/therapy , Skin , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , FeverABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is a viable marker of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) disease activity. We studied the utility of measuring EDN from esophageal epithelial brushings for diagnosing EoE, focusing on two scenarios: (1) cases of exclusive distal eosinophilia and (2) cases of discrepancy between endoscopy and histology. METHODS: Records of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with EDN measured via esophageal brushings at Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children in Orlando, Florida from January 2014 to October 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were collected. RESULTS: We reviewed 231 patient records (66.7% male, mean age 10.3 years, range 1-22 years). EDN values correlated with endoscopic reference score (EREFS) and peak eosinophil count (PEC) (Spearman's rho = 0.756 (p < 0.001) and 0.824 (p < 0.001) respectively). Average PEC, EREFS, and EDN concentrations were higher in patients with active EoE than in controls or patients with EoE in remission (inactive). When grouping patients based on esophageal eosinophilia distribution, EDN mirrored PEC, and EREFS. Patients with exclusive distal eosinophilia had lower EDN concentrations than those with eosinophilia in >1 level of the esophagus (23.8 ± 46.1 mcg/mL vs. 171.3 ± 205.8 mcg/mL respectively, p < 0.001). EDN values were more consistent with EREFS in cases of discrepancies between endoscopic findings and pathology (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: EDN measured in esophageal brushing samples reflects disease activity objectively and accurately. It also offers significant value in cases of exclusive distal esophageal eosinophilia and when discrepancies exist between endoscopy and histology.
Subject(s)
Enteritis , Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin , Eosinophilia , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Gastritis , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Young Adult , Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin/chemistry , Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin/metabolism , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/pathology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Eosinophils/pathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As an opportunistic pathogenic fungus, Schizophyllum has been rarely reported to infect humans. By reporting a case of definite diagnosis of Schizophyllum infection, we aim to improve clinicians' understanding of this bacterium. METHODS: By reporting a case with cough and sputum as the main manifestations, after empirical antiinfective chest CT suggesting a more progressive inflammatory lesion and a mass-like lesion in the paratracheal area of the main airways, a diagnosis of Schizophyllum infection was finally made by bronchoscopy with the delivery of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). RESULTS: The patient was finally diagnosed with rare Schizophyllum infection. After antifungal treatment, the symptoms improved, and the patient was discharged. CONCLUSIONS: Although Schizophyllum is a rare fungal infection, it should be taken seriously in patients with diabetes or who are immunocompromised. At the same time, mNGS plays a key role in the detection of rare and emerging pathogens, which is worthy of clinical interest.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents , Schizophyllum , Humans , Schizophyllum/isolation & purification , Schizophyllum/genetics , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/microbiology , Male , Bronchoscopy , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Lung Diseases, Fungal/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Fungal/microbiology , Lung Diseases, Fungal/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Mycoses/diagnosis , Mycoses/microbiology , Mycoses/drug therapy , Mycoses/complicationsABSTRACT
Nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis is characterized by persistent dry or barely productive cough and bronchial eosinophilia without airway obstruction or bronchial hyperreactivity. It is primarily a chronic disease, in which some patients have clinical and pathophysiological relapses, while others progress to asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It accounts for 5% to 30% of cases referred for chronic cough. Exposure to common inhalants and occupational sensitizers has been proposed as a possible cause of the disease, although the etiology and underlying mechanisms are uncertain. Some features are similar to those of asthma, such as airway eosinophilia, inflammatory mediator levels, and airway remodeling. Differences in airway pathophysiology, such as the location of airway inflammation and levels of IL-13 and PGE-2, have been reported. Sputum cell count is the gold standard test for diagnosis, and other biomarkers, such as exhaled nitric oxide, could support the diagnosis. A systematic review of treatments for the disease shows that while inhaled corticosteroids are the primary option, the appropriate dose, the type of corticosteroid, and the duration of treatment remain unknown. Treatment duration is inversely correlated with the relapse rate. Increased doses of inhaled corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids, and leukotriene receptor antagonists are recommended in persistent disease. Anti-IL-5 biologics could be promising in this disease. Studies that investigate biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis are necessary, as are randomized controlled studies for second-line treatments.
Subject(s)
Bronchitis , Eosinophilia , Humans , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/drug therapy , Eosinophilia/immunology , Bronchitis/diagnosis , Bronchitis/drug therapy , Bronchitis/immunology , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , BiomarkersABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is a highly aggressive type of blood cancer that falls under the category of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN). In the fifth edition of the WHO classification of tumors, this category has been renamed MDS/MPN with neutrophilia. Although eosinophilia is commonly observed in blood cancers, it is rarely seen in aCML. CASE PRESENTATION: This study presents a case of aCML that was diagnosed six years after the patient developed eosinophilia. The patient had undergone tests to rule out other primary and secondary diseases, but the eosinophilia remained unexplained. Treatment with corticosteroids and hydroxyurea had proven ineffective. Six years later, the patient experienced an increase in white blood cells, primarily neutrophils. After ruling out other possible diagnoses, a combination of morphologic and molecular genetic findings led to the diagnosis of aCML. The patient responded well to treatment with azacitidine. CONCLUSIONS: This study summarizes the current state of aCML diagnosis and management and discusses the possible connection between eosinophilia and aCML.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilia , Humans , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/complications , Male , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic, Atypical, BCR-ABL Negative/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic, Atypical, BCR-ABL Negative/drug therapy , Time Factors , AgedABSTRACT
AIM: Paediatric eosinophilia is a common clinical dilemma, often leading to resource- and time-consuming assessments. We aim to evaluate the main aetiologies of eosinophilia in children from different socioeconomic settings and propose a diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted through PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Studies published from January 2012 to June 2023 reporting the incidence and aetiology of peripheral eosinophilia in children were included. Evidence from studies on children originating from low- or high-income countries was compared. RESULTS: A total of 15 observational studies, encompassing 3409 children, were included. The causes of eosinophilia varied based on the children's origin and the eosinophilia severity. In children from high-income countries, allergic diseases were the leading cause, with a prevalence of 7.7%-78.2%, while parasitosis ranged from 1.0% to 9.1%. In children from low-income countries, parasitosis was predominant, ranging from 17.7% to 88.3%, although allergic diseases were found in 2.5%-4.8% of cases. Concerning severity, allergic diseases were the leading cause of mild-to-moderate eosinophilia; parasitosis was associated with moderate-to-severe eosinophilia, while immunological disorders were mostly found in severe cases. CONCLUSION: We developed a step-up diagnostic algorithm that considers the child's origin and eosinophilia severity and could optimise resource allocation.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Eosinophilia , Child , Humans , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
Background: Measurement of airway inflammation is an important step to determine phenotype of asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). Objective: To assess the level of nitric oxide in exhaled air (FeNO), nasal fraction of nitric oxide (nasal NO), their relationship with clinical control and blood eosinophils in patients with steroid-naive mild and moderate asthma and AR. Methods: One hundred forty-seven patients (65 men), ages 26-49.5 years (mean age, 32 years) with AR (n = 81) or AR and concomitant asthma (n = 46) and 20 healthy subjects were included in a single-center cohort study. All the patients underwent spirometry with reversibility test. Control of asthma and AR was assessed by using the Asthma Control Questionnaire and the visual analog scale, respectively. Levels of FeNO and nasal NO were measured by chemiluminescent analyzer, peripheral blood eosinophils were counted by automatic analyzer. Results: The FeNO level was significantly elevated in the patients with asthma and concomitant AR compared with the healthy subjects and was associated with control of both asthma and AR. There was no correlation between nasal NO and control of AR. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the level of eosinophils of 150 cells/µL may be a cutoff for lower airway eosinophilic inflammation. Blood eosinophils count was unable to distinguish eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic upper airway inflammation. Conclusion: We confirm that FeNO but not nasal NO is a marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation in patients with mild-moderate steroid-naive AR and concomitant asthma. A blood eosinophil level of ≥150 cells/µL may be a simple marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation in patients with asthma. However, its low specificity requires repeated measurements and use in combination with other biomarkers.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Eosinophilia , Rhinitis, Allergic , Male , Humans , Adult , Nitric Oxide/analysis , Cohort Studies , Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic/complications , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/complications , Eosinophils , Inflammation/complications , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/complications , SteroidsABSTRACT
We present an interesting and rare case of Capillaria hepatica infection in a 2-year-old boy, who presented with fever, rash, hepatomegaly and peripheral eosinophilia. FNAC of hepatic lesion showed parasitic eggs and PCR from the aspirate confirmed the diagnosis. We describe the cytomorphological features and provide educational multiple-choice questions related to the topic.
Subject(s)
Capillaria , Enoplida Infections , Eosinophilia , Humans , Male , Eosinophilia/pathology , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/parasitology , Child, Preschool , Animals , Capillaria/isolation & purification , Enoplida Infections/diagnosis , Enoplida Infections/pathology , Liver/pathology , Liver/parasitology , Biopsy, Fine-NeedleABSTRACT
A boy with known autism spectrum disorder was transferred to our department due to a rapidly worsening respiratory situation. The patient's history revealed previous treatment with albendazole against a Toxocara infection 2 weeks prior in Poland. Blood analysis showed such severe eosinophilia and markedly elevated levels of IgE that, initially, a hematologic malignancy was suspected. However, diagnostic workup including autoimmune diagnostic, molecular genetic testing, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), bone marrow aspiration, and parasitological testing led to the diagnosis of an insufficiently treated Toxocara infection. Treatment with albendazole and prednisone (six cycles for 4 weeks each) was administered. This treatment regime led to prompt improvement of symptoms and normalization of laboratory findings.
Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Eosinophilia , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Toxocariasis , Male , Animals , Humans , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Autism Spectrum Disorder/complications , Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis , Autism Spectrum Disorder/drug therapy , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Toxocariasis/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) is a refractory subtype of CRS. This study aimed to compare the differences in clinical features and peripheral blood indices between eCRS and non-eCRS Chinese patients and identify the predictive factors for eCRS. METHODS: In this study, a total of 1352 patients with CRS were enrolled and divided into eCRS and non-eCRS groups based on the degree of eosinophilic infiltration in histopathology, and their demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as peripheral blood indices, were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with eCRS, and the optimal cut-off values of predictors were determined using subject working curves. RESULTS: As compared to those in the non-eCRS group patients, the proportion of males, age, proportion of smokers, peripheral blood eosinophil count, and erythrocyte count were significantly higher, while the peripheral blood neutrophil count, platelet count, neutrophil/lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte count ratio (PLR), and neutrophil × platelet/lymphocyte count ratio (SII index) were significantly lower in the eCRS group patients. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, peripheral blood neutrophil count, eosinophil count, and platelet count were independent predictors of eCRS, and eosinophil count > 2.05 × 108/L could be used as a diagnostic marker for eCRS with a sensitivity and specificity of 87.1% and 78.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in the clinical features of eCRS and non-eCRS patients. Peripheral blood eosinophil count could early and more accurately predict eCRS.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilia , Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Rhinosinusitis , Sinusitis , Adult , Male , Humans , Rhinitis/surgery , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/pathology , Leukocyte Count , Sinusitis/surgery , Chronic Disease , China/epidemiology , Eosinophils , Nasal Polyps/complicationsABSTRACT
A 47-year-old Japanese woman presented with a 1-year history of right-sided epiphora. On initial consultation, the patient had a high right tear meniscus height. CT images revealed bilateral soft tissue opacification in the nasal cavity and maxillary, frontal, and ethmoid sinuses. The lesion in the right nasal cavity and maxillary sinus involved the right lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct. Blood test results showed elevated eosinophil count. Endoscopic sinus surgery and excisional biopsy of the nasolacrimal duct were performed. Histopathological examinations of the excised right nasolacrimal duct and nasal polyps from the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus showed high levels of eosinophilic inflammatory infiltrates. The definite diagnosis of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis was made, based on clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings. At 1.5-year follow-up, tear meniscus height was normal, the lacrimal drainage system remained patent, and the rhinosinusitis did not recur.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilia , Lacrimal Duct Obstruction , Nasolacrimal Duct , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/complications , Chronic Disease , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/complications , Nasolacrimal Duct/pathology , Nasolacrimal Duct/diagnostic imaging , Lacrimal Duct Obstruction/diagnosis , Lacrimal Duct Obstruction/etiology , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/complications , Endoscopy , RhinosinusitisABSTRACT
Summary: Eosinophil-associated diseases (EADs) refer to heterogeneous conditions in which eosinophils are believed to play critical pathological roles. They encompass common respiratory conditions, such as asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), less common primary eosinophilic disorders of gastrointestinal tract, and rare conditions including eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A literature search was carried out in January 2024 in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases using the PubMed search engine (PubMed, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD). We focused on blood eosinophilia and hypereosinophilia. A diagnostic workup is proposed. From allergist's point of view, we focused the review on 4 groups of eosinophilic disorders of specific interest. Our increased understanding of type 2 inflammation and biology has recently led to development of highly effective precision targeted therapies that are now approved for a growing number of eosinophilic disorders. Novel targeted biologics have a major impact on treatment strategies and have resulted in major advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of these disorders. In the context of EADs, according to the heterogeneity of eosinophilic disorders a multidisciplinary approach should be adopted. Allergists and Clinical Immunologists play an important role as they have a clear understanding of the eosinophilic inflammation and the role of cytokines and are trained to recognize and characterize type 2 (T2) inflammation and its associated pathologies.
Subject(s)
Allergists , Eosinophilia , Eosinophils , Humans , Eosinophils/immunology , Eosinophilia/immunology , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/diagnosis , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/immunology , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/drug therapy , Allergy and Immunology , Sinusitis/immunology , Sinusitis/diagnosisABSTRACT
Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is a novel and uncommon type of renal cell carcinoma, which has been recently recognized and introduced as a distinct entity in the WHO 2022 kidney tumor classification. Previously known as "unclassified RCC", followed by "tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated RCC", ESC-RCC is now a distinct category of kidney tumor, with its own name, with specific clinical manifestations, and a unique morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular profile. Due to its recent introduction and the limited available data, the diagnosis of ESC-RCC is still a complex challenge, and it is probably frequently misdiagnosed. The secret of diagnosing this tumor lies in the pathologists' knowledge, and keeping it up to date through research, thereby limiting the use of outdated nomenclature. The aim of our case-based review is to provide a better understanding of this pathology and to enrich the literature with a new case report, which has some particularities compared to the existing cases.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/pathology , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , MaleABSTRACT
Eosinophilia is a challenge to our everyday clinical practice. There are multiple causes to consider when diagnosing eosinophilia, and drug hypersensitivity must be taken into account. It is especially difficult to manage it in hospitalized patients with multiple complications and infections. Allergy tests are not always as helpful as we would like, so we rely on clinical observation and laboratory analysis to establish our diagnosis. We present a unique clinical case because the same patient presented two clinical episodes of eosinophilia after the administration of Carbapenems in the context of abdominal infection.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Carbapenems , Eosinophilia , Humans , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Carbapenems/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Male , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Middle Aged , FemaleABSTRACT
This article summarizes the essential aspects of current knowledge about eosinophils, classifies eosinophilia in terms of the dimensions healthy or harmful reaction, takes a specific look at eosinophils in the field of otorhinolaryngology, and gives recommendations for diagnostic workup and therapeutic intervention in case of proven eosinophilia, particularly as an adverse drug reaction. The thoughts are inspired by communications at the 29th Congress of the European Rhinologic Society in Sofia, Bulgaria, 2023.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilia , Otolaryngology , Humans , Eosinophils , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the diagnostic and predictive factors for perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) onset in children by analyzing the results of the Chiba High-risk Birth Cohort for Allergy study, which examined newborns with a family history of allergies. METHODS: Overall, 306 pregnant women were recruited. Their newborns were examined by otolaryngologists and pediatric allergists at 1, 2, and 5 years of age. Participants with clinical and laboratory data available at all consultation points were considered eligible. RESULTS: Among 187 eligible participants, the prevalence rates of PAR were 2.1%, 4.3%, and 24.1% at 1, 2, and 5 years of age, respectively. AR-specific nasal local findings and eosinophils in nasal smear were observed in a substantial number of patients with PAR at 1 and 2 years of age. Factors present up to 2 years of age that were associated with PAR onset at 5 years of age, in descending order, were as follows: sensitization to house dust mites (HDM), nasal eosinophilia, and sensitization to cat dander. In 44 cases with HDM sensitization, nasal eosinophilia up to 2 years of age achieved a sensitivity of 76.0% and a specificity of 73.7% for predicting PAR onset at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Rhinitis findings and nasal eosinophilia are useful auxiliary diagnostic items for pediatric PAR. Sensitization to HDM and nasal eosinophilia were the most influential factors associated with future PAR onset. A combination of these factors may facilitate the prediction of PAR onset.
Subject(s)
Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial , Humans , Female , Child, Preschool , Male , Infant , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/immunology , Allergens/immunology , Prevalence , Infant, Newborn , Risk Factors , Japan/epidemiology , Animals , Pyroglyphidae/immunology , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/epidemiology , Eosinophilia/immunology , PregnancyABSTRACT
Migrant patients share the same diseases as natives, but biological or environmental differences may lead to distinct prevalence and manifestations of certain syndromes. Some common conditions in Primary Care stand out, such as fever, diarrhea, anemia, eosinophilia, and chronic cough, where it is important to have a special consideration. Fever may indicate a serious imported illness, and malaria should always be ruled out. Diarrhea is generally of infectious origin, and in most cases, management is outpatient. Anemia may indicate malnutrition or malabsorption, while eosinophilia may indicate a parasitic infection. Lastly, chronic cough may be a sign of tuberculosis, especially in immigrants from endemic areas. Family medicine holds a privileged position for the comprehensive, culturally sensitive, and person-centered approach to these conditions.