Influence of preoperative antituberculosis chemotherapy duration on perioperative complications in patients treated with epididymectomy for epididymal tuberculosis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the influence of preoperative antituberculosis chemotherapy duration on perioperative epididymectomy complications in patients with epididymal tuberculosis (ETB). METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients with ETB between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2023, who underwent unilateral epididymectomy at our hospital. We selected preoperative antituberculosis chemotherapy duration of 2, 4, and 8 weeks as the cutoffs for this study, to explore whether there are differences in the incidence of intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complications among the patients with different preoperative antituberculosis chemotherapy durations. Intraoperative complications were graded according to the Satava classification, and 30-day postoperative complications were defined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The study groups were compared using the unpaired t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Pearson's chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Overall, 155 patients were included. Statistical analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the incidence of intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complications between patients with shorter preoperative antituberculosis chemotherapy duration and those with longer preoperative antituberculosis chemotherapy duration. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ETB, preoperative antituberculosis chemotherapy duration did not significantly affect the incidence of perioperative complications after epididymectomy.

Can we improve time to patency with vasoepididymostomy with an innovative epididymal occlusion stitch?

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive azoospermia occurs when there is a blockage in the male reproductive tract, leading to a complete absence of sperm in the ejaculate. It constitutes around 40% of all cases of azoospermia (1, 2). Blockages in the male reproductive tract can arise from either congenital or acquired factors, affecting various segments such as the epididymis, vas deferens, and ejaculatory ducts (3). Examples of congenital causes encompass conditions like congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and unexplained epididymal blockages (4). Acquired instances of obstructive azoospermia may result from factors like vasectomy, infections, trauma, or unintentional injuries caused by medical procedures (5). This complex condition affecting male fertility, presents two main treatment options: microsurgical reconstruction and surgical extraction of sperm followed by in vitro fertilization (IVF). Microsurgical reconstruction proves to be the most cost-effective option for treating obstructive azoospermia when compared with assisted reproductive techniques (6, 7). However, success rates of reconstruction defined by patency are as high as 99% for vasovasostomy (VV) but decline to around 65% if vasoepididymostomy (VE) is required (8, 9). Thus, continued refinement in technique is necessary in order to attempt to improve patency for patients undergoing VE. In this video, we show a comprehensive demonstration of microsurgical VE, highlighting the innovative epididymal occlusion stitch. The goal of this innovative surgical technique is to improve outcomes for VE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient is a 39-year-old male diagnosed with obstructive azoospermia who presents for surgical reconstruction via VE. His partner is a 37-years-old female with regular menstrual cycles. The comprehensive clinical data encompasses a range of factors, including FSH levels, results from semen analysis, and outcomes from testicular sperm aspiration. This thorough exploration aims to provide a thorough understanding of our innovative surgical technique and its application in addressing complex cases of obstructive azoospermia. RESULTS: The procedure was started on the right, the vas deferens was identified and transected. The abdominal side of the vas was intubated and a vasogram performed, there was no obstruction. There was no fluid visible from the testicular side of the vas for analysis, thus we proceeded with VE. Upon inspection of the epididymis dilated tubules were identified. After selecting a tubule for VE, two 10-0 nylon sutures were placed, and it was incised. Upon inspection of the fluid motile sperm was identified. After VE, we performed a novel epididymal occlusion stitch technique. This was completed distal to the anastomosis by placing a 7-0 prolene through the tunica of the epididymis from the medial to lateral side. This stitch was then tightened down with the goal to largely occlude the epididymis so that sperm will preferentially travel through the anastomosis. The steps were then repeated on the left. At 3-month follow up, the patient had no change in testicular size as compared with preoperative size (18cc), he had no testicular or incisional discomfort, and on semen analysis he had presence of motile sperm. After 3 months post-surgery, the patient had motile sperm seen on semen analysis. DISCUSSION: The introduction of a novel epididymal occlusion stitch demonstrates a targeted strategy to enhance the success of microscopic VE. Encouragingly, a 3-month post-surgery follow-up reveals the presence of motile sperm, reinforcing the potential efficacy of our approach. This is promising given the historical lower patency, delayed time to patency, and higher delayed failure rates that patients who require VE experience (10). In total, 40% of all azoospermia cases can be attributed to obstruction. The conventional treatments for obstructive azoospermia involve microsurgical reconstruction and surgical sperm retrieval followed by IVF. While microsurgical reconstruction has proven to be economically viable, the quest for enhanced success rates has led to the exploration of innovative techniques. Historically, the evolution of VV and VE procedures, initially performed in the early 20th century, laid the foundation for contemporary microsurgical approaches (11). Notably, the microscopic VV demonstrated significant improvements in patency rates and natural pregnancy likelihood, as evidenced by the seminal Vasovastomy Study Group study in 1991 (8). In contemporary literature, success rates particularly for VE remain unchanged for the past three decades since the original published success rates by the Vasectomy Reversal Study Group (12). VE is associated with a longer time to patency as well with patients taking 2.8 to 6.6 months to have sperm return to ejaculate as compared to 1.7 to 4.3 months for those undergoing VV. Additionally, of those patients who successfully have sperm return to the ejaculate after VE up to 50% will have delayed failure compared to 12% for those undergoing VV who are patent. Finally, of those who experience delayed failure after undergoing VE it usually occurs earlier with studies reporting as early as 6 months post-operatively (10). Given the lack of improvement and significantly worsened outcomes with VE further surgical refinement is a constant goal for surgeons performing this procedure. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this video is both a demonstration and a call to action for commitment to surgical innovation. We aim to raise the bar in VE success rates, ultimately bringing tangible benefits to patients and contributing to the ongoing evolution of reproductive medicine. The novel epididymal occlusion stitch emerges as a beacon of progress, promising not only enhanced safety but also potential reductions in patency time. Surgical excellence and methodological refinement, as exemplified in this video, lay the foundation for a future where male reproductive surgery continues to break new ground.

The Role of Additional Epididymis Resection during Hydrocelectomy: Is It of Any Benefit in Comparison to Simple Hydrocelectomy?

INTRODUCTION: Open hydrocelectomy via scrotal incision is the standard approach for secondary hydroceles. Traditionally, the Swiss urologic community offer hydrocelectomy with additional resection of the epididymis in elderly men with completed family planning. It is believed that the additional resection of the epididymis reduces the postoperative recurrence rate of hydroceles. However, there is no evidence supporting this theory. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the recurrence and complication rates for patients with secondary hydroceles undergoing either pure hydrocelectomy (puH) or hydrocelectomy with additional resection of the epididymis (HRE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all male patients who underwent surgical therapy for secondary hydroceles between May 2003 and February 2019 at our institution. Patient's baseline and perioperative characteristics as well as postoperative characteristics including complications and recurrence rates were gathered and compared between different surgical techniques. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were identified. puH was performed in 93 (40%) cases and HRE in 141 (60%) patients. Patients in the HRE group were older (median age: 62 vs. 38 years, p < 0.001), had a higher ASA-Score (p < 0.001), were more often on platelet aggregation inhibitors (19% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.01), and had a longer median operative time (75 vs. 64 min, p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 46 months, a similar number of recurrent hydroceles were found for puH (7 [7.5%]) and HRE (6 [4.5%]) (p = 0.3). Complications were observed in 19 (20%) cases after puH compared to 25 (18%) cases after HRE (p = 0.6). Patients after puH experienced more often severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 3b) compared to the HRE group (5 vs. 12%, p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: puH and HRE showed similar results in terms of overall low recurrence rates and also in terms of postoperative complications, even though patients who underwent puH experienced slightly higher severe complications. Both procedures are safe and effective, but it seems that HRE does not provide a relevant clinical benefit in comparison to puH for the management of men with secondary hydroceles.

A Modified Transversal Two-Suture Microsurgical Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy for the Treatment of Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia.

INTRODUCTION: We have developed a modified vasoepididymostomy procedure, namely "fenestrated" transversal two-suture microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and outcome of this fenestrated vasoepididymostomy for epididymal obstructive azoospermia (OA). METHODS: Microsurgical two-suture transversal intussusception vasoepididymostomy was performed using our modified fenestration technique in 64 OA patients due to epididymal obstruction at our hospital. Fenestration means making an opening on the epididymal tubule wall. The edges of the epididymal tubule "window" were stitched transversally (two stitches) using the two double-armed 9-0 atraumatic sutures. The epididymal tubule was anastomosed to the lumen of the vas deferens. The patency rate and pregnancy rate were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 64 OA patients, 45 received bilateral microsurgical two-suture transversal intussusception vasoepididymostomy, while 19 underwent unilateral microsurgical two-suture transversal intussusception vasoepididymostomy. All of the patients were followed up after the operation. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 54 months. Among 45 cases of bilateral surgery, the patency rate was 88.89% (40/45), and the natural pregnancy rate was 28.89% (13/45). After the patency was confirmed postoperatively, 3 cases had recurrent OA, of which 2 cases had return of sperm to the ejaculate by oral antibiotics and scrotal self-massage. As for the 19 cases of unilateral microsurgery, the patency rate was 68.42% (13/19), and the natural pregnancy rate was 21.05% (4/19). CONCLUSION: The fenestrated transversal two-suture microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy can achieve a good patency rate in OA patients and did not increase the difficulty and duration of the procedure.

[Primary Leiomyosarcoma of the Epididymis : A Case Report].

A 63-year-old man presented with right scrotal swelling. A physical examination revealed a painless, palpable mass in the right scrotum. The mass was well defined and lobulated. Subsequently, a diagnosis of right epididymal tumor was made, and right high orchiectomy was performed. Hematoxylin-eosin and immunostaining revealed leiomyosarcoma of the epididymis. When a diagnosis of epididymal malignant tumor is made, the standard treatment is radical orchiectomy.

[A Case of Metachronous Rupture of Right Testis and Right Epididymis].

The patient was a 15-year-old male. Four months prior to his visit to our department, he was hit in the right scrotum by a baseball, which caused right scrotal swelling and pain. He visited a urologist who prescribed analgesics. During follow up observation, right scrotal hydrocele appeared and a puncture procedure was performed two times. Four months later, while climbing a rope for strength training, his scrotum became entangled by the rope. He immediately felt right scrotal pain and visited a urologist. Two days later, he was referred to our department for a thorough examination. Scrotum ultrasound revealed right scrotal hydroceles and swollen right cauda epididymis. The patient was treated conservatively with pain control. The next day, the pain did not improve, and surgery was decided since testicular rupture could not be completely ruled out. Surgery was performed on the third day. The caudal portion of the right epididymis was injured approximately 2cm, the tunica albuginea had been ruptured and the testicular parenchyma had escaped. The surface of the testicular parenchyma was covered with a thin film, suggesting that 4 months had elapsed since the tunica albuginea injury. The injured area of the epididymis tail was sutured. Subsequently, we removed the remaining testicular parenchyma and restored the tunica albuginea. Twelve months postoperatively, right hydrocele and testicular atrophy were not observed.

Symptomatic Intraparenchymal Epididymal Cysts: Description of 11 cases.

Epididymal cysts are benign cystic formations of the epididymis that usually appear in adolescence or early adulthood. Their frequency doubles after the age of 14-15. Obstruction in the epididymal efferent ductules with subsequent prostenotic dilatation of them, as well as dysgenesis due to hormonal disorders during fetal or postnatal life, are possible. At the 1st Department of Pediatric Surgery of A.U.Th. we treated 11 cases of boys at the age of 11-16 who presented with acute scrotum because of an epididymal cyst. The diagnosis was confirmed by ultrasound scanning . Due to persistent symptomatology, patients underwent surgical exploration and removal of the cyst. The postoperative care of the patients was uncomplicated with immediate remission of symptoms. In one case, ipsilateral acute epididymitis occurred after 10 days, which was successfully treated with antibiotic therapy. It is reported that approximately 50% of epididymal cysts involute within an average of 17 months. In conclusion, using the data obtained from the review, of the small in number of international bibliography studies, it is proposed conservative treatment of asymptomatic cysts with diameter smaller than 1 cm and surgical excision [1] of large asymptomatic cysts with diameter greater than 1 cm, which do not regress after a follow-up of 24-48 months, cysts, regardless of their diameter, responsible for persistent symptoms and in the manifestation of acute scrotal symptoms due to inflammation, intravesical bleeding or secondarily torsion of the epididymis.

[Testicular and epididymal sperm extraction surgery]. / Chirurgies d'extraction de spermatozoïdes testiculaires et épididymaires.

BACKGROUND: Testicular and epididymal sperm extraction surgery is a frequent procedure. However, to date, there has been no French consensus on the technique to be preferred in the various situations of male infertility and on the best way to perform them. We therefore decided to proceed with a formalized expert consensus, using the method recommended by the French National Authority for Health. The aim was to provide the French urology community with practical advice on how best to perform these procedures. METHODS: Twenty-six international experts met online for the consensus. A research committee carried out a comprehensive literature review and prepared the 55 statements submitted to the rating group. After 2 rounds of scoring, 50 recommendations were validated in March 2023, having achieved a consensus of more than 85% among the experts. RESULTS: The consensus covered (1) preparation for sperm extraction surgery, (2) the different sperm extraction surgery techniques (Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration [MESA], Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration [PESA], Conventional Testicular Sperm Extraction [TESE], Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction [micro-TESE]), (3) advice to be given to the patient concerning the postoperative period, before presenting the results of the sperm extraction surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: The expert consensus meeting on the performance of sperm extraction surgery presented a set of clinical guidelines based on the available literature and expert opinion. These guidelines should have a favourable effect on the development of this activity in France.

[Influence of epididymitis history on the results of vasoepididyostomy in patients with epididymal obstruction].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of epididymitis history on the results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and spontaneous pregnancy in patients with epididymal obstruction. METHODS: Totally 205 patients with epididymal obstruction underwent microsurgical two-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy from January 2014 to December 2016. After surgery, we evaluated the semen quality of the patients every 3 months till conception and compared the rates of patency and spontaneous pregnancy between the patients with and those without an epididymitis history. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 22 to 46 (mean 31) years, 37 (22.2%) with and 126 (77.8%) without an epididymitis history among the 163 patients for whom a 25.4-month follow-up (from 7 to 42 months) was completed. No statistically significant differences were observed postoperatively between the patients with and those without an epididymitis history in the patency rate (73.0% vs 81.7%, P = 0.243), sperm concentration (18 ï¼»1.3－33.6ï¼½ vs 15.2 ï¼»0.8－33.4ï¼½ ×106/ml, P = 0.710), percentage of progressively motile sperm (27.5 ï¼»0－46.1ï¼½% vs 19.3 ï¼»0－41ï¼½% (P = 0.592) or rate of spontaneous pregnancy (24.3% vs 38.9%, P = 0.104). CONCLUSION: Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy is an effective method for the treatment of epididymal obstruction, and epididymitis history does not affect the results of the strategy.

Vasal vessel-sparing microsurgical single-armed vasoepididymostomy to epididymal obstructive azoospermia: A retrospective control study.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vasal vessel-sparing modified single-armed 2-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy (SA-LIVE) to epididymal obstructive azoospermia patients. Forty consecutive epididymal obstructive azoospermia cases, who underwent microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in Shanghai General Hospital from January 2019 to October 2019, were included in this study. Twenty cases underwent SA-LIVE (group A), and 20 cases underwent vasal vessel-sparing SA-LIVE (group B). Until March 2021, the mean follow-up period was 16.9 ± 4.1 (12-23) months. The overall patency rate was 82.5%, and 80% and 85% for group A and group B respectively. The mean time to achieve patency was 4.11 ± 2.74 months. The overall natural pregnancy rate was 51.5%(17/33) at the mean follow-up of 16.9 months. The natural pregnancy rate was 50.0% for group A and 52.9% for group B (p > .05). At the time of 6 months post-operation, the patency rate was 70% for group A and 80% for group B (p = .465); the natural pregnancy rate was 0% for group A and 31.3% for group B (p = .022). Vasal vessel-sparing SA-LIVE is safe and effective to achieve favourable patency and pregnancy rates. Preserving vasal vessel would improve natural pregnancy rate at a very early stage.

A modified single-armed microsurgical vasoepididymostomy for epididymal obstructive azoospermia: intraoperative choice and postoperative consideration.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and the duration required for the sperm to return to the ejaculate after a modified single-armed 2-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy (SA-LIVE). METHODS: From March 2015 to December 2018, 134 patients with epididymal obstruction azoospermia underwent the modified single-armed vasoepididymostomy at Shanghai General Hospital. The outcomes and clinical findings were documented and evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 17 (range: 3-36) months. RESULTS: Patency was assessed by the return of sperm in the ejaculate. The overall patency rate was 55.2%, and the patency rates were 58.9, 40.7, 36.4, and 58.9% for bilateral surgery, unilateral surgery, proximal anastomosis, and distal anastomosis, respectively. The average time to achieve patency was 4.11 ± 2.74 months. In the first 6 months, 87.8% (65/74) patency patients reported sperm in the ejaculate. The overall pregnancy rate was 40.9% (29/66) at the follow-up of 3-36 months, and the natural pregnancy rate was 30.3% (20/66). The natural pregnancy rate was 32.1% post-bilateral surgery and 33.3% for the site of distal anastomosis; surprisingly, it was 0% for the site of proximal anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Modified SA-LIVE is safe and may achieve favorable patency and pregnancy rates. When double-armed sutures are not accessible, single-armed may be preferable. The expected patency time was within 1 year. Moreover, because of the low natural pregnancy rate for proximal anastomosis, sperm banking is preferred to SA-LIVE.

Outcomes of partial intussusception and endo-to-side vasoepididymostomy in men with epididymal obstructive azoospermia.

OBJECTIVES: Vasoepididymostomy is an ideal surgical approach for epididymal obstructive azoospermia. The aim of the present study was to compare reproductive outcomes of vasoepididymostomy with several anastomotic techniques, including end-to-side and longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy, and partial intussusception and endo-to-side vasoepididymostomy. METHODS: A case-control study including 110 infertile men with epididymal obstructive azoospermia with mean age of 35 years was carried out. Univariate and multivariate analyses using clinical factors were carried out to predict patency and non-assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. Johnsen score count and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression were used as surrogates for spermatogenic function. Operative time, number of 10-0 sutures and late failure rates were also compared. RESULTS: The overall patency and non-assisted reproductive technology pregnancy rates were 70% and 32%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that the presence of motile sperm in the epididymis and a higher spermatogenic function (P < 0.05) were independent predictors for patency, and that a higher spermatogenic function and anastomosis at the caput/corpus (P < 0.001) were predictors for non-assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. The operative time was significantly shorter with partial intussusception and endo-to-side than with the other techniques (P < 0.001), and the number of 10-0 sutures was significantly less with partial intussusception and endo-to-side than with longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Partial intussusception and endo-to-side as well as end-to-side and longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy are feasible vasoepididymostomy techniques for epididymal obstruction. Spermatogenic function plays important roles in patency and non-assisted reproductive technology pregnancy after vasoepididymostomy. Depending on the surgeon's expertise, partial intussusception and endo-to-side provides similar functional outcomes to those of more established vasoepididymostomy techniques, such as end-to-side and longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy, and it could therefore be considered an effective technique for seminal reconstruction in patients with epididymal obstructive azoospermia.

The Kinetics of Sperm Return and Late Failure Following Vasovasostomy or Vasoepididymostomy: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy are technically challenging microsurgical reconstructive procedures necessary for men with obstructive azoospermia at the level of the vas deferens or epididymis. Patency rates following vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy have been widely described in the literature. However, few reports have discussed the timing of sperm return to the ejaculate after reconstruction as well as the proportion of men in whom late failure develops following vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Therefore, the objective of this article was to review the rates and predictors associated with late failure and the timing of sperm returning to the ejaculate after vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines via the PubMed®/MEDLINE® database. We included relevant articles published in English in peer reviewed journals from 1960 to 2017 which reported outcomes regarding time to patency, time to late failure or the late failure rate after vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Macroscopic reconstructions were excluded from study. RESULTS: A total of 24 articles were included in the review. Mean time to patency after vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy ranged from 1.7 to 4.3 and 2.8 to 6.6 months, respectively. The late failure rate after microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy ranged from 0% to 12% and 1% to 50%, respectively. Mean time to late failure after vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy ranged from 9.7 to 13.6 and 6 to 14.2 months, respectively. There was significant heterogeneity in the available data, limiting comparisons between series. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm returns to the ejaculate sooner in men who undergo vasovasostomy compared to vasoepididymostomy. Late failures are heterogeneously defined in the literature but they occur at a rate that is not insignificant. Thus, clinicians should discuss considerations for sperm cryopreservation.

Prospective analysis of factors predicting feasibility & success of longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy in men with idiopathic obstructive azoospermia.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: : Microsurgical reconstruction for idiopathic obstructive azoospermia is a challenging procedure, and selection of appropriate patients is important for successful outcomes. This prospective study was done to evaluate the ability of scrotal ultrasound measurements to predict the surgical feasibility and determine factors that could predict a patent anastomosis following vaso-epididymal anastomosis (VE) in men with idiopathic obstructive azoospermia. METHODS: : In this prospective study, men diagnosed with idiopathic obstructive azoospermia, scheduled for a longitudinal intussusception VE, underwent a scrotal ultrasound measurement of testicular and epididymal dimensions. During surgery, site and type of anastomosis, presence of sperms in the epididymal fluid and technical satisfaction with the anastomosis were recorded. All men where VE could be performed were followed up for appearance of sperms in the ejaculate. Ultrasound parameters were compared between men who had a VE versus those with negative exploration. Predictive factors were compared between men with or without a patent anastomosis. RESULTS: : Thirty four patients were included in the study conducted between September 2014 and August 2016 and a VE was possible in only 19 (55%) patients. Of these 19 patients, six had a patent anastomosis with one pregnancy. Preoperative ultrasound measurements could not identify patients where a VE could not be performed. Motile sperm in the epididymal fluid was the only significant predictor of a successful anastomosis. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: : Forty five per cent of men planned for a VE for idiopathic obstructive azoospermia could not undergo a reconstruction. Ultrasound assessment of testicular and epididymal dimensions could not predict the feasibility of performing a VE. The presence of motile sperms in the epididymal fluid was the only significant predictor of a patent VE in our study.

Open epididymal spermatozoa aspiration for obstructive azoospermia.

In men suffering from obstructive azoospermia (OA), surgical sperm retrieval (SR) can be performed for use with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Several techniques of surgical SR exist, with various results. In our facility, we have developed the open epididymal spermatozoa aspiration (OESA) procedure. The aim of this study was to report on the sperm retrieval rate (SRR), reproductive outcome and neonatal outcome of OESA followed by ICSI. In addition, we have investigated possible predictors of successful SR and clinical pregnancy. A total of 231 men who were treated with OESA were included in this retrospective analysis, together with their female partners. We found an overall SRR of 76.6%. Serum FSH was a significant negative predictor of successful SR (odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.98; p = 0.021). Overall cumulative pregnancy rate was 50.8%. Higher age (odds ratio 0.90; p < 0.001) and frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer (odds ratio 0.56; p = 0.004) were negatively associated with clinical pregnancy in multivariable analysis. Reproductive and neonatal outcomes did not differ according to obstruction cause. We conclude that OESA is a reliable and safe method for surgical SR in men suffering from OA.

Evaluation of the morphokinetic parameters and development of pre-implantation embryos obtained by testicular, epididymal and ejaculate spermatozoa using time-lapse imaging system.

Low sperm quality has negative effects on fertilisation and embryo development. The males with azoospermia apply for testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) in order to retrieve sperm. To date, there have not been any reports investigating morphokinetic parameters of pre-implantation embryos using testicular and epididymal spermatozoa. Therefore, we aimed to correlate embryo development and assess morphogenetic parameters in embryos obtained by TESE and MESA using time-lapse imaging. A total of 60 patients undergoing IVF treatments were included in this study. Twenty men with normal semen parameters were selected as control group. Twenty men undergoing TESE and 20 men undergoing MESA were also included in this study. The morphokinetic parameters of time intervals between the second polar body (PB2) extrusion, pronuclei formation and disappearance and cleavage divisions showed significant variations in TESE, MESA and control groups. Furthermore, the pregnancy rates (positive beta-hCG) were shown to be similar in both TESE and the control group (55% in each group), whereas for the MESA group, this rate was significantly lower (39%, p = 0.049). Further extrapolation of these results may implicate that the obstructive azoospermia patients should undergo TESE instead of MESA for better blastocyst development and higher pregnancy rates.

Seminal plasma neutral alpha-glucosidase activity as an early predictor of patency and natural pregnancy after microsurgical vasoepididymostomy.

Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (MVE) is recommended as a first-line option for treatment of epididymal obstructive azoospermia (EOA). However, early indicators for predicting patency and natural pregnancy are unclear. Our aim was to explore the early predictive value of seminal plasma neutral alpha-glucosidase (NAG) activity for patency and natural pregnancy after MVE. Eighty-four patients with EOA who underwent MVE were enrolled in this study. The post-operative patency and natural pregnancy rates were 60.71% and 33.33% respectively. The presence of motile epididymal spermatozoa at the anastomosis site and NAG activity measured at the first month after MVE were early and independent predictors of patency and natural pregnancy. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of NAG activity for prediction of patency and natural pregnancy were 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.88) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.92). The best cut-off values of NAG activity for predicting patency and pregnancy were 15.9 and 17.0 m IU/ejaculate respectively. In conclusion， NAG activity measured at the first month after MVE is an early and independent predictor of patency and natural pregnancy.

Metastasis of the epididymis and spermatic cord from pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A rare entity. Description of a case and revision of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic epididymal and spermatic cord adenocarcinoma from epithelial tumors are a rare condition. The most frequent primary cancers are prostate, lung, kidney, gastrointestinal tumors and breast. In literature, there are very low number of cases reporting metastasis from pancreatic cancer to epididymis and spermatic cord. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a case of 70-years old man with history of left orchiectomy for undescended testicle, who presented to our department with a palpable nodule in the right scrotum. Scrotal ultrasound revealed an inhomogeneous hypoechoic nodule of epididymis and/or spermatic cord. Neoplastic markers showed high levels of CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) and bHCG (beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin). The patient underwent right surgical scrotal exploration with orchifunicolectomy. Pathologic examination revealed pathologic tissue showing rare glandular structures. Immunohistochemistry profile was compatible with malign epithelial neoplasm with glandular differentiation. Total body CT-scan revealed pathologic tissue in pancreas between head and body and a suspect pathologic lesion in liver and 18-FDG PET-scan confirmed the pancreatic neoplastic mass and a suspect secondary hepatic lesion. Biopsy of pancreatic pathologic area was positive for ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The patient was sent to oncologic evaluation and started chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Malignancies of epididymis and spermatic cord are rare entities and, in literature, very low number of cases of metastasis from pancreatic carcinoma to epididymis and spermatic cord are described. Early differential diagnosis is fundamental mostly in those patients with age range unusual for testis cancers.

Pregnancy and live birth rates after microsurgical vasoepididymostomy for azoospermic patients with epididymal obstruction.

STUDY QUESTION: Can microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (MVE) be an effective treatment for azoospermic men with epididymal obstruction? SUMMARY ANSWER: MVE is an effective treatment for epididymal obstruction, with overall patency and live birth rates of 76.3% and 34.8%, respectively. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: We showed that MVE was an effective treatment for non-vasectomized patients with epididymal obstruction and prior failed sperm retrieval for ICSI. ICSI is the preferred treatment for obstructive azoospermia in some reproductive centers. Some small studies documented that MVE could achieve high patency and pregnancy rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective study was designed to investigate the natural pregnancy and live birth rates after MVE and to identify possible predictors of pregnancy. From January 2011 to July 2013, 241 patients underwent MVE for epididymal obstruction in our andrology center. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All patients underwent scrotal exploration and MVE. Semen was analyzed every 3 months postoperatively until pregnancy was achieved. Patency, pregnancy and live birth rates were evaluated. Preoperative and intraoperative data were compared between patent and non-patent groups to identify factors affecting the patency rate. Predictors of pregnancy were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses with Cox regression models. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Data from 198 males (82.2%) were analyzed. The mean (±SD) age of males and female partners was 31.0 ± 5.8 and 28.4 ± 4.4 years, respectively. Sperm was present in the ejaculate of 151 patients (76.3%) postoperatively. Patency rates were increased for patients with bilateral anastomosis, distant anastomosis and motile sperm in epididymal fluid. Overall, 81/198 males (40.9%) reported pregnancy in partners and 73 newborns were delivered. The overall live birth rate was 34.8%. Male age (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] 0.407 [0.203-0.816], P = 0.011), sperm concentration (HR [95% CI] 4.988 [2.777-8.957], P < 0.001) and forward motility (HR [95% CI] 1.751 [1.042-2.945], P = 0.035) were predictors of pregnancy. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: A randomized control trial comparing pregnancy rates, live birth rates, risks and medical costs of MVE and IVF/ICSI is needed. The sample size of females >35 years old was small, so we could not determine whether female age was a predictor of pregnancy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: MVE is an effective therapy for azoospermic patients with epididymal obstruction. Sperm concentration and forward motility may predict pregnancy after the procedure. Microsurgical reconstruction could be a first choice for epididymal obstruction. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was received. The authors have no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.