ABSTRACT
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by notorious resistance to current therapies attributed to inherent tumor heterogeneity and highly desmoplastic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Unique proline isomerase Pin1 regulates multiple cancer pathways, but its role in the TME and cancer immunotherapy is unknown. Here, we find that Pin1 is overexpressed both in cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and correlates with poor survival in PDAC patients. Targeting Pin1 using clinically available drugs induces complete elimination or sustained remissions of aggressive PDAC by synergizing with anti-PD-1 and gemcitabine in diverse model systems. Mechanistically, Pin1 drives the desmoplastic and immunosuppressive TME by acting on CAFs and induces lysosomal degradation of the PD-1 ligand PD-L1 and the gemcitabine transporter ENT1 in cancer cells, besides activating multiple cancer pathways. Thus, Pin1 inhibition simultaneously blocks multiple cancer pathways, disrupts the desmoplastic and immunosuppressive TME, and upregulates PD-L1 and ENT1, rendering PDAC eradicable by immunochemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase/metabolism , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/immunology , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/chemistry , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/immunology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Allografts/immunology , Amino Acid Motifs , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/metabolism , Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/immunology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Membrane/drug effects , Cell Membrane/metabolism , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Drug Synergism , Endocytosis/drug effects , Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1/metabolism , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy , Lysosomes/drug effects , Lysosomes/metabolism , Mice , Microfilament Proteins/chemistry , Microfilament Proteins/metabolism , Oncogenes , Organoids/drug effects , Organoids/pathology , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Survival Analysis , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , GemcitabineABSTRACT
Drug resistance contributes to poor therapeutic response in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Metabolomic analysis suggested metabolic reprogramming in gemcitabine-resistant urothelial carcinoma cells, whereby increased aerobic glycolysis and metabolic stimulation of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) promoted pyrimidine biosynthesis to increase the production of the gemcitabine competitor deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP) that diminishes its therapeutic effect. Furthermore, we observed that gain-of-function of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) induced reductive glutamine metabolism to stabilize Hif-1α expression and consequently stimulate aerobic glycolysis and PPP bypass in gemcitabine-resistant UC cells. Interestingly, IDH2-mediated metabolic reprogramming also caused cross resistance to CDDP, by elevating the antioxidant defense via increased NADPH and glutathione production. Downregulation or pharmacological suppression of IDH2 restored chemosensitivity. Since the expression of key metabolic enzymes, such as TIGAR, TKT, and CTPS1, were affected by IDH2-mediated metabolic reprogramming and related to poor prognosis in patients, IDH2 might become a new therapeutic target for restoring chemosensitivity in chemo-resistant urothelial carcinoma.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Cell Line, Tumor , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Gemcitabine , Glycolysis , Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit/genetics , Pentose Phosphate Pathway , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No treatment has surpassed platinum-based chemotherapy in improving overall survival in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, global, open-label, randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab with the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3-week cycles of enfortumab vedotin (at a dose of 1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously on days 1 and 8) and pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg intravenously on day 1) (enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group) or gemcitabine and either cisplatin or carboplatin (determined on the basis of eligibility to receive cisplatin) (chemotherapy group). The primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 886 patients underwent randomization: 442 to the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and 444 to the chemotherapy group. As of August 8, 2023, the median duration of follow-up for survival was 17.2 months. Progression-free survival was longer in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (median, 12.5 months vs. 6.3 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.54; P<0.001), as was overall survival (median, 31.5 months vs. 16.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.58; P<0.001). The median number of cycles was 12 (range, 1 to 46) in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and 6 (range, 1 to 6) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 55.9% of the patients in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and in 69.5% of those in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab resulted in significantly better outcomes than chemotherapy in patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, with a safety profile consistent with that in previous reports. (Funded by Astellas Pharma US and others; EV-302 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04223856.).
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antineoplastic Agents , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Urologic Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/secondary , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Gemcitabine/administration & dosage , Gemcitabine/adverse effects , Gemcitabine/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Survival Analysis , Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology , Urologic Neoplasms/secondaryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No new agent has improved overall survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma when added to first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this phase 3, multinational, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma either to receive intravenous nivolumab (at a dose of 360 mg) plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (nivolumab combination) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab (at a dose of 480 mg) every 4 weeks for a maximum of 2 years, or to receive gemcitabine-cisplatin alone every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival. The objective response and safety were exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 608 patients underwent randomization (304 to each group). At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, overall survival was longer with nivolumab-combination therapy than with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.96; P = 0.02); the median survival was 21.7 months (95% CI, 18.6 to 26.4) as compared with 18.9 months (95% CI, 14.7 to 22.4), respectively. Progression-free survival was also longer with nivolumab-combination therapy than with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88; P = 0.001). The median progression-free survival was 7.9 months and 7.6 months, respectively. At 12 months, progression-free survival was 34.2% and 21.8%, respectively. The overall objective response was 57.6% (complete response, 21.7%) with nivolumab-combination therapy and 43.1% (complete response, 11.8%) with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. The median duration of complete response was 37.1 months with nivolumab-combination therapy and 13.2 months with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 61.8% and 51.7% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin resulted in significantly better outcomes in patients with previously untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma than gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 901 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03036098.).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Cisplatin , Gemcitabine , Nivolumab , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Gemcitabine/administration & dosage , Gemcitabine/adverse effects , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Administration, IntravenousABSTRACT
A crucial challenge in medicine is choosing which drug (or combination) will be the most advantageous for a particular patient. Usually, drug response rates differ substantially, and the reasons for this response unpredictability remain ambiguous. Consequently, it is central to classify features that contribute to the observed drug response variability. Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers with limited therapeutic achievements due to the massive presence of stroma that generates an environment that enables tumor growth, metastasis, and drug resistance. To understand the cancer-stroma cross talk within the tumor microenvironment and to develop personalized adjuvant therapies, there is a necessity for effective approaches that offer measurable data to monitor the effect of drugs at the single-cell level. Here, we develop a computational approach, based on cell imaging, that quantifies the cellular cross talk between pancreatic tumor cells (L3.6pl or AsPC1) and pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs), coordinating their kinetics in presence of the chemotherapeutic agent gemcitabine. We report significant heterogeneity in the organization of cellular interactions in response to the drug. For L3.6pl cells, gemcitabine sensibly decreases stroma-stroma interactions but increases stroma-cancer interactions, overall enhancing motility and crowding. In the AsPC1 case, gemcitabine promotes the interactions among tumor cells, but it does not affect stroma-cancer interplay, possibly suggesting a milder effect of the drug on cell dynamics.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Gemcitabine , Cell Communication , Cell Line, Tumor , Tumor MicroenvironmentABSTRACT
Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is a cornerstone of standard care for gallbladder cancer (GBC) treatment. Still, drug resistance remains a significant challenge, influenced by factors such as tumor-associated microbiota impacting drug concentrations within tumors. Enterococcus faecium, a member of tumor-associated microbiota, was notably enriched in the GBC patient cluster. In this study, we investigated the biochemical characteristics, catalytic activity, and kinetics of the cytidine deaminase of E. faecium (EfCDA). EfCDA showed the ability to convert gemcitabine to its metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine. Both EfCDA and E. faecium can induce gemcitabine resistance in GBC cells. Moreover, we determined the crystal structure of EfCDA, in its apo form and in complex with 2', 2'-difluorodeoxyuridine at high resolution. Mutation of key residues abolished the catalytic activity of EfCDA and reduced the gemcitabine resistance in GBC cells. Our findings provide structural insights into the molecular basis for recognizing gemcitabine metabolite by a bacteria CDA protein and may provide potential strategies to combat cancer drug resistance and improve the efficacy of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in GBC treatment.
Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic , Cytidine Deaminase , Deoxycytidine , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Enterococcus faecium , Gallbladder Neoplasms , Gemcitabine , Humans , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/metabolism , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/chemistry , Cell Line, Tumor , Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , Cytidine Deaminase/genetics , Cytidine Deaminase/chemistry , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Deoxycytidine/metabolism , Deoxycytidine/chemistry , Enterococcus faecium/enzymology , Enterococcus faecium/genetics , Gallbladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gallbladder Neoplasms/genetics , Gallbladder Neoplasms/microbiology , Gemcitabine/metabolism , Gemcitabine/pharmacology , Gemcitabine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Nucleoside analogue drugs are pervasively used as antiviral and chemotherapy agents. Cytarabine and gemcitabine are anti-cancer nucleoside analogue drugs that contain C2' modifications on the sugar ring. Despite carrying all the required functional groups for DNA synthesis, these two compounds inhibit DNA extension once incorporated into DNA. It remains unclear how the C2' modifications on cytarabine and gemcitabine affect the polymerase active site during substrate binding and DNA extension. Using steady-state kinetics, static and time-resolved X-ray crystallography with DNA polymerase η (Pol η) as a model system, we showed that the sugar ring C2' chemical groups on cytarabine and gemcitabine snugly fit within the Pol η active site without occluding the steric gate. During DNA extension, Pol η can extend past gemcitabine but with much lower efficiency past cytarabine. The Pol η crystal structures show that the -OH modification in the ß direction on cytarabine locks the sugar ring in an unfavorable C2'-endo geometry for product formation. On the other hand, the addition of fluorine atoms on gemcitabine alters the proper conformational transition of the sugar ring for DNA synthesis. Our study illustrates mechanistic insights into chemotherapeutic drug inhibition and resistance and guides future optimization of nucleoside analogue drugs.
Subject(s)
Cytarabine , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase , Deoxycytidine , Gemcitabine , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/chemistry , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Cytarabine/chemistry , Cytarabine/pharmacology , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/metabolism , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/chemistry , Humans , Crystallography, X-Ray , DNA/chemistry , DNA/metabolism , DNA/biosynthesis , Catalytic Domain , DNA Replication/drug effects , KineticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 therapy and chemotherapy is a recommended first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but the role of PD-1 blockade remains unknown in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. We assessed the addition of sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, to standard chemoradiotherapy in this patient population. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at nine hospitals in China. Adults aged 18-65 years with newly diagnosed high-risk non-metastatic stage III-IVa locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (excluding T3-4N0 and T3N1) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using blocks of four to receive gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent cisplatin radiotherapy (standard therapy group) or standard therapy with 200 mg sintilimab intravenously once every 3 weeks for 12 cycles (comprising three induction, three concurrent, and six adjuvant cycles to radiotherapy; sintilimab group). The primary endpoint was event-free survival from randomisation to disease recurrence (locoregional or distant) or death from any cause in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included adverse events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03700476) and is now completed; follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Dec 21, 2018, and March 31, 2020, 425 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the sintilimab (n=210) or standard therapy groups (n=215). At median follow-up of 41·9 months (IQR 38·0-44·8; 389 alive at primary data cutoff [Feb 28, 2023] and 366 [94%] had at least 36 months of follow-up), event-free survival was higher in the sintilimab group compared with the standard therapy group (36-month rates 86% [95% CI 81-90] vs 76% [70-81]; stratified hazard ratio 0·59 [0·38-0·92]; p=0·019). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 155 (74%) in the sintilimab group versus 140 (65%) in the standard therapy group, with the most common being stomatitis (68 [33%] vs 64 [30%]), leukopenia (54 [26%] vs 48 [22%]), and neutropenia (50 [24%] vs 46 [21%]). Two (1%) patients died in the sintilimab group (both considered to be immune-related) and one (<1%) in the standard therapy group. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 20 (10%) patients in the sintilimab group. INTERPRETATION: Addition of sintilimab to chemoradiotherapy improved event-free survival, albeit with higher but manageable adverse events. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether this regimen can be considered as the standard of care for patients with high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China, Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation, Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission, and Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Chemoradiotherapy , Induction Chemotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/therapy , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/drug therapy , Adult , China/epidemiology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Aged , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Gemcitabine , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Adolescent , Progression-Free SurvivalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The highly heterogeneous cellular and molecular makeup of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) not only fosters exceptionally aggressive tumor biology, but contradicts the current concept of one-size-fits-all therapeutic strategies to combat PDAC. Therefore, we aimed to exploit the tumor biological implication and therapeutic vulnerabilities of a clinically relevant molecular PDAC subgroup characterized by SMAD4 deficiency and high expression of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (SMAD4-/-/NFATc1High). METHODS: Transcriptomic and clinical data were analyzed to determine the prognostic relevance of SMAD4-/-/NFATc1High cancers. In vitro and in vivo oncogenic transcription factor complex formation was studied by immunoprecipitation, proximity ligation assays, and validated cross model and species. The impact of SMAD4 status on therapeutically targeting canonical KRAS signaling was mechanistically deciphered and corroborated by genome-wide gene expression analysis and genetic perturbation experiments, respectively. Validation of a novel tailored therapeutic option was conducted in patient-derived organoids and cells and transgenic as well as orthotopic PDAC models. RESULTS: Our findings determined the tumor biology of an aggressive and chemotherapy-resistant SMAD4-/-/NFATc1High subgroup. Mechanistically, we identify SMAD4 deficiency as a molecular prerequisite for the formation of an oncogenic NFATc1/SMAD3/cJUN transcription factor complex, which drives the expression of RRM1/2. RRM1/2 replenishes nucleoside pools that directly compete with metabolized gemcitabine for DNA strand incorporation. Disassembly of the NFATc1/SMAD3/cJUN complex by mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling inhibition normalizes RRM1/2 expression and synergizes with gemcitabine treatment in vivo to reduce the proliferative index. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PDAC characterized by SMAD4 deficiency and oncogenic NFATc1/SMAD3/cJUN complex formation exposes sensitivity to a mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling inhibition and gemcitabine combination therapy.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Gemcitabine , Cell Line, Tumor , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/metabolism , Smad4 Protein/genetics , Smad4 Protein/metabolism , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases/metabolism , Smad3 Protein/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The dismal prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is linked to the presence of pancreatic cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) that respond poorly to current chemotherapy regimens. The epigenetic mechanisms regulating CSCs are currently insufficiently understood, which hampers the development of novel strategies for eliminating CSCs. METHODS: By small molecule compound screening targeting 142 epigenetic enzymes, we identified that bromodomain-containing protein BRD9, a component of the BAF histone remodeling complex, is a key chromatin regulator to orchestrate the stemness of pancreatic CSCs via cooperating with the TGFß/Activin-SMAD2/3 signaling pathway. RESULTS: Inhibition and genetic ablation of BRD9 block the self-renewal, cell cycle entry into G0 phase and invasiveness of CSCs, and improve the sensitivity of CSCs to gemcitabine treatment. In addition, pharmacological inhibition of BRD9 significantly reduced the tumorigenesis in patient-derived xenografts mouse models and eliminated CSCs in tumors from pancreatic cancer patients. Mechanistically, inhibition of BRD9 disrupts enhancer-promoter looping and transcription of stemness genes in CSCs. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, the data suggest BRD9 as a novel therapeutic target for PDAC treatment via modulation of CSC stemness.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Animals , Humans , Mice , Bromodomain Containing Proteins , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology , Gemcitabine , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Smad2 Protein/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGOUND AND AIMS: In advanced, liver-only intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has been suggested as promising in nonrandomized studies. We aimed to compare data from patients with advanced, liver-only iCCA treated in the first line in clinical trials with either chemotherapy alone or the combination with SIRT. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We collected individual patients' data from the ABC-01, ABC-02, ABC-03, BINGO, AMEBICA, and MISPHEC prospective trials. Data from patients with liver-only iCCA treated in chemotherapy-only arms of the first 5 trials were compared with data from patients treated with SIRT and chemotherapy in MISPHEC. Emulated target trial paradigm and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW methods) using the propensity score were used to minimize biases. We compared 41 patients treated with the combination with 73 patients treated with chemotherapy alone, the main analysis being in 43 patients treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine or gemcitabine-oxaliplatin. After weighting, overall survival was significantly higher in patients treated with SIRT: median 21.7 months (95% CI: 14.1; not reached) versus 15.9 months(95% CI: 9.8; 18.9), HR = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.34; 0.99), p = 0.049. Progression-free survival was significantly improved: median 14.3 months (95% CI: 7.8; not reached) versus 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.9; 12.1), HR = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.31; 0.89), p < 0.001. Results were confirmed in most sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis derived from prospective clinical trials suggests that SIRT combined with chemotherapy might improve outcomes over chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced, liver-only iCCA. Randomized controlled evidence is needed to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , Cholangiocarcinoma , Humans , Gemcitabine , Prospective Studies , Cholangiocarcinoma/drug therapy , Cholangiocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/pathology , Bile Duct Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bile Duct Neoplasms/radiotherapyABSTRACT
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies, with a notoriously dismal prognosis. As a competitive inhibitor of DNA synthesis, gemcitabine is the cornerstone drug for treating PDAC at all stages. The therapeutic effect of gemcitabine, however, is often hindered by drug resistance, and the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. It is unclear whether their response to chemotherapeutics is regulated by endocrine regulators, despite the association between PDAC risk and endocrine deregulation. Here, we show that prolactin receptor (PRLR) synergizes with gemcitabine in both in vitro and in vivo treatment of PDAC. Interestingly, PRLR promotes the expression of miR-4763-3p and miR-3663-5p, two novel miRNAs whose functions are unknown. Furthermore, the analysis of transcriptome sequencing data of tumors from lactating mouse models enriches the PPP pathway, a multifunctional metabolic pathway. In addition to providing energy, the PPP pathway mainly provides a variety of raw materials for anabolism. We demonstrate that two key enzymes of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), G6PD and TKT, are directly targeted by miR-4763-3p and miR-3663-5p. Notably, miR-4763-3p and miR-3663-5p diminish the nucleotide synthesis of the PPP pathway, thereby increasing gemcitabine sensitivity. As a result, PRLR harnesses these two miRNAs to suppress PPP and nucleotide synthesis, subsequently elevating the gemcitabine sensitivity of PDAC cells. Also, PDAC tissues and tumors from LSL-KrasG12D/+, LSL-Trp53R172H/+, and PDX1-cre (KPC) mice exhibit downregulation of PRLR. Bisulfite sequencing of PDAC tissues revealed that PRLR downregulation is due to epigenetic methylation. In this study, we show for the first time that the endocrine receptor PRLR improves the effects of gemcitabine by boosting two new miRNAs that block the PPP pathway and nucleotide synthesis by inhibiting two essential enzymes concurrently. The PRLR-miRNAs-PPP axis may serve as a possible therapeutic target to supplement chemotherapy advantages in PDAC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Deoxycytidine , Gemcitabine , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase , MicroRNAs , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Receptors, Prolactin , Animals , Female , Humans , Mice , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/metabolism , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase/genetics , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Receptors, Prolactin/metabolism , Receptors, Prolactin/genetics , Mice, NudeABSTRACT
This study demonstrates the potential of using biological nanoparticles to deliver RNA therapeutics targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) as a treatment strategy for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). RNA therapeutics offer prospects for intracellular immune modulation, but effective clinical translation requires appropriate delivery strategies. Milk-derived nanovesicles were decorated with epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM) aptamers and used to deliver PD-L1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) or Cas9 ribonucleoproteins directly to CCA cells. In vitro, nanovesicle treatments reduced PD-L1 expression in CCA cells while increasing degranulation, cytokine release, and tumor cell cytotoxicity when tumor cells were co-cultured with T cells or natural killer cells. Similarly, immunomodulation was observed in multicellular spheroids that mimicked the tumor microenvironment. Combining targeted therapeutic vesicles loaded with siRNA to PD-L1 with gemcitabine effectively reduced tumor burden in an immunocompetent mouse CCA model compared with controls. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential of engineered targeted nanovesicle platforms for delivering therapeutic RNA cargoes to tumors, as well as their use in generating effective targeted immunomodulatory therapies for difficult-to-treat cancers such as CCA.
Subject(s)
B7-H1 Antigen , Cholangiocarcinoma , Immunotherapy , RNA, Small Interfering , Cholangiocarcinoma/therapy , Cholangiocarcinoma/metabolism , Cholangiocarcinoma/immunology , Cholangiocarcinoma/drug therapy , Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , B7-H1 Antigen/genetics , Animals , Humans , Mice , Cell Line, Tumor , Immunotherapy/methods , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , RNA, Small Interfering/administration & dosage , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Bile Duct Neoplasms/therapy , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Bile Duct Neoplasms/metabolism , Bile Duct Neoplasms/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Disease Models, Animal , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , GemcitabineABSTRACT
The existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is considered to be the key factor for metastasis and chemoresistance. Thus, novel therapeutic strategies for eradicating CSCs are urgently needed. Here we aimed to explore the role of KLF15 in stemness and the feasibility of using KLF15 to inhibit CSCs and improve chemotherapy sensitivity in PDAC. In this study, we report that KLF15 is negatively associated with poor survival and advanced pathological staging of PDAC. Moreover, tumorous KLF15 suppresses the stemness of PDAC by promoting the degradation of Nanog, and KLF15 directly interacts with Nanog, inhibiting interaction between Nanog with USP21. We also demonstrate that the KLF15/Nanog complex inhibit the stemness in vivo and in PDX cells. Tazemetostat suppresses stemness and sensitizes PDAC cells to gemcitabine by promoting KLF15 expression in PDAC. In summary, the findings of our study confirm the value of KLF15 level in diagnosis and prognosis of PDAC, it is the first time to explore the inhibition role of KLF15 in stemness of PDAC and the regulation mechanism of Nanog, contributing to provide a new therapeutic strategy that using Tazemetostat sensitizes PDAC cells to gemcitabine by promoting KLF15 expression for PDAC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors , Nanog Homeobox Protein , Neoplastic Stem Cells , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase , Humans , Nanog Homeobox Protein/metabolism , Nanog Homeobox Protein/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplastic Stem Cells/metabolism , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , Neoplastic Stem Cells/drug effects , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/metabolism , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors/metabolism , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors/genetics , Animals , Mice , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase/metabolism , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , Male , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Mice, Nude , Gemcitabine , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , PrognosisABSTRACT
AIMS: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is often intrinsically-resistant to standard-of-care chemotherapies such as gemcitabine. Acquired gemcitabine resistance (GemR) can arise from treatment of initially-sensitive tumors, and chemotherapy can increase tumor aggressiveness. We investigated the molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance and chemotherapy-driven tumor aggressiveness, which are understood incompletely. METHODS: Differential proteomic analysis was employed to investigate chemotherapy-driven chemoresistance drivers and responses of PDAC cells and patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDX) having different chemosensitivities. We also investigated the prognostic value of FGFR1 expression in the efficacy of selective pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi)-gemcitabine combinations. RESULTS: Quantitative proteomic analysis of a highly-GemR cell line revealed fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) as the highest-expressed receptor tyrosine kinase. FGFR1 knockdown or FGFRi co-treatment enhanced gemcitabine efficacy and decreased GemR marker expression, implicating FGFR1 in augmentation of GemR. FGFRi treatment reduced PDX tumor progression and prolonged survival significantly, even in highly-resistant tumors in which neither single-agent showed efficacy. Gemcitabine exacerbated aggressiveness of highly-GemR tumors, based upon proliferation and metastatic markers. Combining FGFRi with gemcitabine or gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel reversed tumor aggressiveness and progression, and prolonged survival significantly. In multiple PDAC PDXs, FGFR1 expression correlated with intrinsic tumor gemcitabine sensitivity. CONCLUSION: FGFR1 drives chemoresistance and tumor aggressiveness, which FGFRi can reverse.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Gemcitabine , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Proteomics , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/genetics , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Drug resistance and tumor recurrence remain clinical challenges in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the underlying mechanism is not fully understood. Here, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing and identified a subset of urothelial cells with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) features (EMT-UC), which is significantly correlated with chemotherapy resistance and cancer recurrence. To validate the clinical significance of EMT-UC, we constructed EMT-UC like cells by introducing overexpression of two markers, Zinc Finger E-Box Binding Homeobox 1 (ZEB1) and Desmin (DES), and examined their histological distribution characteristics and malignant phenotypes. EMT-UC like cells were mainly enriched in UC tissues from patients with adverse prognosis and exhibited significantly elevated EMT, migration and gemcitabine tolerance in vitro. However, EMT-UC was not specifically identified from tumorous tissues, certain proportion of them were also identified in adjacent normal tissues. Tumorous EMT-UC highly expressed genes involved in malignant behaviors and exhibited adverse prognosis. Additionally, tumorous EMT-UC was associated with remodeled tumor microenvironment (TME), which exhibited high angiogenic and immunosuppressive potentials compared with the normal counterparts. Furthermore, a specific interaction of COL4A1 and ITGB1 was identified to be highly enriched in tumorous EMT-UC, and in the endothelial component. Targeting the interaction of COL4A1 and ITGB1 with specific antibodies significantly suppressed tumorous angiogenesis and alleviated gemcitabine resistance of UC. Overall, our findings demonstrated that the driven force of chemotherapy resistance and recurrence of UC was EMT-UC mediated COL4A1-ITGB1 interaction, providing a potential target for future UC treatment.
Subject(s)
Collagen Type IV , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition , Integrin beta1 , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neovascularization, Pathologic , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement/drug effects , Collagen Type IV/genetics , Collagen Type IV/metabolism , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition/drug effects , Gemcitabine/pharmacology , Gemcitabine/therapeutic use , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Integrin beta1/metabolism , Integrin beta1/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Neovascularization, Pathologic/pathology , Neovascularization, Pathologic/genetics , Prognosis , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/blood supply , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urothelium/blood supply , Urothelium/drug effects , Urothelium/pathology , Zinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1/genetics , Zinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1/metabolismABSTRACT
Gemcitabine (GEM) based induction chemotherapy is a standard treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, approximately 15â¯% of patients are still resistant to GEM-containing chemotherapy, which leads to treatment failure. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms of GEM resistance remain poorly understood. Herein, based on a microarray analysis, we identified 221 dysregulated lncRNAs, of which, DYNLRB2-AS1 was one of the most upregulated lncRNAs in GEM-resistance NPC cell lines. DYNLRB2-AS1 was shown to function as contain an oncogenic lncRNA that promoted NPC GEM resistance, cell proliferation, but inhibited cell apoptosis. Mechanistically, DYNLRB2-AS1 could directly bind to the DHX9 protein and prevent its interaction with the E3 ubiquitin ligase PRPF19, and thus blocking PRPF19-mediated DHX9 degradation, which ultimately facilitated the repair of DNA damage in the presence of GEM. Clinically, higher DYNLRB2-AS1 expression indicated an unfavourable overall survival of NPC patients who received induction chemotherapy. Overall, this study identified the oncogenic lncRNA DYNLRB2-AS1 as an independent prognostic biomarker for patients with locally advanced NPC and as a potential therapeutic target for overcoming GEM chemoresistance in NPC.
Subject(s)
DEAD-box RNA Helicases , Deoxycytidine , Gemcitabine , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , RNA, Long Noncoding , Animals , Humans , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , DEAD-box RNA Helicases/metabolism , DEAD-box RNA Helicases/genetics , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/genetics , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/metabolism , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/genetics , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding/metabolism , Ubiquitination/drug effectsABSTRACT
AIMS: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal disease. Chemotherapy based on gemcitabine (GEM) remains the first-line drug for patients with advanced PDAC. However, GEM resistance impairs its therapeutic effectiveness. Therefore, identifying effective therapeutic targets are urgently needed to overcome GEM resistance. METHODS: The clinical significance of Tripartite Motif Containing 29 (TRIM29) was identified by exploring GEO datasets and TCGA database and its potential biological functions were predicted by GSEA analysis. The regulatory axis was established by bioinformatics analysis and validated by mechanical experiments. Then, in vitro and in vivo assays were performed to validate the roles of TRIM29 in PDAC GEM resistance. RESULTS: High TRIM29 expression was associated with poor prognosis of PDAC and functional experiments demonstrated that TRIM29 promoted GEM resistance in PDAC GEM-resistant (GR) cells. Furthermore, we revealed that circRPS29 promoted TRIM29 expression via competitive interaction with miR-770-5p and then activated MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Additionally, both in vitro and in vivo functional experiments demonstrated that circRPS29/miR-770-5p/TRIM29 axis promoted PDAC GEM resistance via activating MEK/ERK signaling pathway. CONCLUSION: Our results identify the significance of the signaling axis, circRPS29/miR-770-5p/TRIM29-MEK/ERK, in PDAC GEM resistance, which will provide novel therapeutic targets for PDAC treatment.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Gemcitabine , MAP Kinase Signaling System , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Transcription Factors , Animals , Humans , Mice , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , MAP Kinase Signaling System/drug effects , Mice, Nude , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , RNA, Circular/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
There is currently no effective treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While palliative chemotherapy offers a survival benefit to most patients, nearly all will eventually progress on treatment and long-term survivability remains poor. Given the lack of subsequent line treatment options, in this study, we sought to identify novel strategies to prevent, delay, or overcome resistance to gemcitabine, one of the most widely used medications in PDAC. Using a combination of single-cell RNA sequencing and high-throughput proteomic analysis, we identified a subset of gemcitabine-resistant tumor cells enriched for calcium/calmodulin signaling. Pharmacologic inhibition of calcium-dependent calmodulin activation led to the rapid loss of drug-resistant phenotypes in vitro, which additional single-cell RNA sequencing identified was due to impaired activation of the RAS/ERK signaling pathway. Consistent with these observations, calcium chelation or depletion of calcium in the culture media also impaired ERK activation in gemcitabine-resistant cells, and restored therapeutic responses to gemcitabine in vitro. We observed similar results using calcium channel blockers (CCBs) such as amlodipine, which inhibited prosurvival ERK signaling in vitro and markedly enhanced therapeutic responses to gemcitabine in both orthotopic xenografts and transgenic models of PDAC. Combined, these results offer insight into a potential means of gemcitabine resistance and suggest that select CCBs may provide a clinical benefit to PDAC patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Amlodipine/pharmacology , Amlodipine/therapeutic use , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Calmodulin , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , United States , Gemcitabine , Pancreatic NeoplasmsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study investigates sex disparities in clinical outcomes and tumour immune profiles in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent upfront resection or resection preceded by gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS: Patients originated from the PREOPANC randomised controlled trial. Upfront surgery was performed in 82 patients, and 66 received nCRT before resection. The impact of sex on overall survival (OS) was investigated using Cox proportional hazards models. The immunological landscape within the tumour microenvironment (TME) was mapped using transcriptomic and spatial proteomic profiling. RESULTS: The 5-year OS rate differed between the sexes following resection preceded by nCRT, with 43% for women compared with 22% for men. In multivariate analysis, the female sex was a favourable independent prognostic factor for OS only in the nCRT group (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.52). Multivariate heterogeneous treatment effects analysis revealed a significant interaction between sex and treatment, implying increased nCRT efficacy among women with resected PDAC. The TME of women contained fewer protumoural CD163+MRC1+M2 macrophages than that of men after nCRT, as indicated by transcriptomic and validated using spatial proteomic profiling. CONCLUSION: PDAC tumours of women are more sensitive to gemcitabine-based nCRT, resulting in longer OS after resection compared with men. This may be due to enhanced immunity impeding the infiltration of protumoral M2 macrophages into the TME. Our findings highlight the importance of considering sex disparities and mitigating immunosuppressive macrophage polarisation for personalised PDAC treatment.