Mucus-degrading Bacteroides link carbapenems to aggravated graft-versus-host disease.

The intestinal microbiota is an important modulator of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which often complicates allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Broad-spectrum antibiotics such as carbapenems increase the risk for intestinal GVHD, but mechanisms are not well understood. In this study, we found that treatment with meropenem, a commonly used carbapenem, aggravates colonic GVHD in mice via the expansion of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (BT). BT has a broad ability to degrade dietary polysaccharides and host mucin glycans. BT in meropenem-treated allogeneic mice demonstrated upregulated expression of enzymes involved in the degradation of mucin glycans. These mice also had thinning of the colonic mucus layer and decreased levels of xylose in colonic luminal contents. Interestingly, oral xylose supplementation significantly prevented thinning of the colonic mucus layer in meropenem-treated mice. Specific nutritional supplementation strategies, including xylose supplementation, may combat antibiotic-mediated microbiome injury to reduce the risk for intestinal GVHD in allo-HSCT patients.

A randomized phase 2 trial of oral vitamin A for graft-versus-host disease in children and young adults.

ABSTRACT: Vitamin A plays a key role in the maintenance of gastrointestinal homeostasis and promotes a tolerogenic phenotype in tissue resident macrophages. We conducted a prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial in which 80 recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were randomized 1:1 to receive pretransplant high-dose vitamin A or placebo. A single oral dose of vitamin A of 4000 IU/kg, maximum 250 000 IU was given before conditioning. The primary end point was incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day +100. In an intent-to-treat analysis, incidence of acute GVHD was 12.5% in the vitamin A arm and 20% in the placebo arm (P = .5). Incidence of acute gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD was 2.5% in the vitamin A arm (P = .09) and 12.5% in the placebo arm at day +180. Incidence of chronic GVHD was 5% in the vitamin A arm and 15% in the placebo arm (P = .02) at 1 year. In an "as treated" analysis, cumulative incidence of acute GI GVHD at day +180 was 0% and 12.5% in recipients of vitamin A and placebo, respectively (P = .02), and cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 2.7% and 15% in recipients of vitamin A and placebo, respectively (P = .01). The only possibly attributable toxicity was asymptomatic grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia in 1 recipient of vitamin A at day +30, which self-resolved. Absolute CCR9+ CD8+ effector memory T cells, reflecting gut T-cell trafficking, were lower in the vitamin A arm at day +30 after HSCT (P = .01). Levels of serum amyloid A-1, a vitamin A transport protein with proinflammatory effects, were lower in the vitamin A arm. The vitamin A arm had lower interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 levels and likely a more favorable gut microbiome and short chain fatty acids. Pre-HSCT oral vitamin A is inexpensive, has low toxicity, and reduces GVHD. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03202849.

A phase 2 study of interleukin-22 and systemic corticosteroids as initial treatment for acute GVHD of the lower GI tract.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. In experimental models, interleukin-22 promotes epithelial regeneration and induces innate antimicrobial molecules. We conducted a multicenter single-arm phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel recombinant human interleukin-22 dimer, F-652, used in combination with systemic corticosteroids for treatment of newly diagnosed lower gastrointestinal acute GVHD. The most common adverse events were cytopenias and electrolyte abnormalities, and there were no dose-limiting toxicities. Out of 27 patients, 19 (70%; 80% confidence interval, 56%-79%) achieved a day-28 treatment response, meeting the prespecified primary endpoint. Responders exhibited a distinct fecal microbiota composition characterized by expansion of commensal anaerobes, which correlated with increased overall microbial α-diversity, suggesting improvement of GVHD-associated dysbiosis. This work demonstrates a potential approach for combining immunosuppression with tissue-supportive strategies to enhance recovery of damaged mucosa and promote microbial health in patients with gastrointestinal GVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02406651.

Spatial transcriptomics reveals distinct tissue niches linked with steroid responsiveness in acute gastrointestinal GVHD.

Severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, especially in steroid-resistant (SR) cases. Spatial transcriptomic technology can elucidate tissue-based interactions in vivo and possibly identify predictors of treatment response. Tissue sections from 32 treatment-naïve patients with biopsy-confirmed lower gastrointestinal (GI) aGVHD were obtained. The GeoMx digital spatial profiler was used to capture transcriptome profiles of >18 000 genes from different foci of immune infiltrates, colonic epithelium, and vascular endothelium. Each tissue compartment sampled showed 2 distinct clusters that were analyzed for differential expression and spatially resolved correlation of gene signatures. Classic cell-mediated immunity signatures, normal differentiated epithelial cells, and inflamed vasculature dominated foci sampled from steroid-sensitive cases. In contrast, a neutrophil predominant noncanonical inflammation with regenerative epithelial cells and some indication of angiogenic endothelial response was overrepresented in areas from SR cases. Evaluation of potential prognostic biomarkers identified ubiquitin specific peptidase 17-like (USP17L) family of genes as being differentially expressed in immune cells from patients with worsened survival. In summary, we demonstrate distinct tissue niches with unique gene expression signatures within lower GI tissue from patients with aGVHD and provide evidence of a potential prognostic biomarker.

Prognostic value of blood biomarkers in steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent acute graft-versus-host disease: a REACH2 analysis.

Systemic steroids are the standard first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), but ∼50% of patients become steroid-refractory or dependent (SR/D). Ruxolitinib is the only Food and Drug Administration- and European Medicines Agency-approved therapy for patients with SR/D aGVHD. In the phase 3 REACH2 trial (NCT02913261), ruxolitinib demonstrated superior efficacy in SR/D aGVHD, with a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) on day 28, durable ORR on day 56, and longer median overall survival compared with the best available therapy (BAT). Identifying biomarkers and clinical characteristics associated with increased probability of response can guide treatment decisions. In this exploratory analysis of the REACH2 study (first biomarker study), we developed baseline (pretreatment) and day 14 models to identify patient characteristics and biomarkers (12 aGVHD-associated cytokines/chemokines, 6 immune cell types, and 3 inflammatory proteins) before and during treatment, which affected the probability of response at day 28. Treatment with ruxolitinib, conditioning, skin involvement, and age were strongly associated with an increased likelihood of response in the ≥1 model. Lower levels of most aGVHD and immune cell markers at baseline were associated with an increased probability of response. In the day 14 model, levels of aGVHD markers at day 14, rather than changes from baseline, affected the probability of response. For both models, the bias-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic values (baseline, 0.73; day 14, 0.80) indicated a high level of correspondence between the fitted and actual outcomes. Our results suggest potential prognostic value of selected biomarkers and patient characteristics.

Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating abatacept in patients with steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allogeneic transplant remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Abatacept is a selective costimulation modulator, used for the treatment of rheumatologic diseases, and was recently the first drug to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease. We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of abatacept in steroid-refractory cGVHD. The overall response rate was 58%, seen in 21 out of 36 patients, with all responders achieving a partial response. Abatacept was well tolerated with few serious infectious complications. Immune correlative studies showed a decrease in interleukin -1α (IL-1α), IL-21, and tumor necrosis factor α as well as decreased programmed cell death protein 1 expression by CD4+ T cells in all patients after treatment with abatacept, demonstrating the effect of this drug on the immune microenvironment. The results demonstrate that abatacept is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cGVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01954979.

Effective treatment of low-risk acute GVHD with itacitinib monotherapy.

The standard primary treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) requires prolonged, high-dose systemic corticosteroids (SCSs) that delay reconstitution of the immune system. We used validated clinical and biomarker staging criteria to identify a group of patients with low-risk (LR) GVHD that is very likely to respond to SCS. We hypothesized that itacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, would effectively treat LR GVHD without SCS. We treated 70 patients with LR GVHD in a multicenter, phase 2 trial (NCT03846479) with 28 days of itacitinib 200 mg/d (responders could receive a second 28-day cycle), and we compared their outcomes to those of 140 contemporaneous, matched control patients treated with SCSs. More patients responded to itacitinib within 7 days (81% vs 66%, P = .02), and response rates at day 28 were very high for both groups (89% vs 86%, P = .67), with few symptomatic flares (11% vs 12%, P = .88). Fewer itacitinib-treated patients developed a serious infection within 90 days (27% vs 42%, P = .04) due to fewer viral and fungal infections. Grade ≥3 cytopenias were similar between groups except for less severe leukopenia with itacitinib (16% vs 31%, P = .02). No other grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in >10% of itacitinib-treated patients. There were no significant differences between groups at 1 year for nonrelapse mortality (4% vs 11%, P = .21), relapse (18% vs 21%, P = .64), chronic GVHD (28% vs 33%, P = .33), or survival (88% vs 80%, P = .11). Itacitinib monotherapy seems to be a safe and effective alternative to SCS treatment for LR GVHD and deserves further investigation.

How I prevent GVHD in high-risk patients: posttransplant cyclophosphamide and beyond.

Advances in conditioning, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and antimicrobial prophylaxis have improved the safety of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), leading to a substantial increase in the number of patients transplanted each year. This influx of patients along with progress in remission-inducing and posttransplant maintenance strategies for hematologic malignancies has led to new GVHD risk factors and high-risk groups: HLA-mismatched related (haplo) and unrelated (MMUD) donors; older recipient age; posttransplant maintenance; prior checkpoint inhibitor and autologous HCT exposure; and patients with benign hematologic disorders. Along with the changing transplant population, the field of HCT has dramatically shifted in the past decade because of the widespread adoption of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), which has increased the use of HLA-mismatched related donors to levels comparable to HLA-matched related donors. Its success has led investigators to explore PTCy's utility for HLA-matched HCT, where we predict it will be embraced as well. Additionally, combinations of promising new agents for GVHD prophylaxis such as abatacept and JAK inhibitors with PTCy inspire hope for an even safer transplant platform. Using 3 illustrative cases, we review our current approach to transplantation of patients at high risk of GVHD using our modern armamentarium.

Novel developments in the prophylaxis and treatment of acute GVHD.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Traditional standard prophylaxis for aGVHD has included a calcineurin inhibitor plus an antimetabolite, whereas treatment has relied mainly on corticosteroids, followed by multiple nonstandard second-line options. In the past decade, this basic framework has been reshaped by approval of antithymocyte globulin products, the emergence of posttransplant cyclophosphamide, and recent pivotal trials studying abatacept and vedolizumab for GVHD prophylaxis, whereas ruxolitinib was approved for corticosteroid-refractory aGVHD treatment. Because of this progress, routine acute GVHD prophylaxis and treatment practices are starting to shift, and results of ongoing trials are eagerly awaited. Here, we review recent developments in aGVHD prevention and therapy, along with ongoing and future planned clinical trials in this space, outlining what future goals should be and the limitations of current clinical trial designs and end points.

Effectiveness of in vivo T-cell-depleted regimen containing porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin in preventing acute graft-versus-host disease after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

To compare the clinical efficacy of porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin (p-ALG) and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) in the treatment of haematological malignancies using haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT), this study was conducted. The incidences of neutrophil and platelet engraftment, respectively, were 100%, 93.6% and 94.4%; 100%, 93.6% and 90.3% in p-ALG 75 mg/kg (n = 57), p-ALG 90 mg/kg (n = 49), and r-ATG 7.5 mg/kg (n = 72). The median time to neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were 11, 12 and 12 days (p = 0.032); 13, 14 and 13 days (p = 0.013), respectively. The incidence of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease and cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease were 16.7% versus 12.5% versus 13.3% (p = 0.817) and 14.7% versus 12.1% versus 19.5% in p-ALG 75 mg/kg, p-ALG 90 mg/kg and r-ATG groups. Notably, the cytomegalovirus infection rate in the p-ALG 75 mg/kg group was significantly lower than the other two groups. The cumulative incidence of 2-year relapse and 2-year overall survival rates were similar (p = 0.901, p = 0.497). The lower dose of p-ALG (75 mg/kg) had a similar efficacy and safety profile compared with r-ATG (7.5 mg/kg) in the setting of haplo-HSCT. Therefore, p-ALG (75 mg/kg) may be an appropriate alternative to r-ATG in the conditioning regimen of haplo-HSCT.

Ruxolitinib for Glucocorticoid-Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a major complication of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, becomes glucocorticoid-refractory or glucocorticoid-dependent in approximately 50% of patients. Robust data from phase 3 randomized studies evaluating second-line therapy for chronic GVHD are lacking. In retrospective surveys, ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK1-JAK2) inhibitor, showed potential efficacy in patients with glucocorticoid-refractory or -dependent chronic GVHD. METHODS: This phase 3 open-label, randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib at a dose of 10 mg twice daily, as compared with the investigator's choice of therapy from a list of 10 commonly used options considered best available care (control), in patients 12 years of age or older with moderate or severe glucocorticoid-refractory or -dependent chronic GVHD. The primary end point was overall response (complete or partial response) at week 24; key secondary end points were failure-free survival and improved score on the modified Lee Symptom Scale at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients underwent randomization; 165 patients were assigned to receive ruxolitinib and 164 patients to receive control therapy. Overall response at week 24 was greater in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (49.7% vs. 25.6%; odds ratio, 2.99; P<0.001). Ruxolitinib led to longer median failure-free survival than control (>18.6 months vs. 5.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.37; P<0.001) and higher symptom response (24.2% vs. 11.0%; odds ratio, 2.62; P = 0.001). The most common (occurring in ≥10% patients) adverse events of grade 3 or higher up to week 24 were thrombocytopenia (15.2% in the ruxolitinib group and 10.1% in the control group) and anemia (12.7% and 7.6%, respectively). The incidence of cytomegalovirus infections and reactivations was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with glucocorticoid-refractory or -dependent chronic GVHD, ruxolitinib led to significantly greater overall response, failure-free survival, and symptom response. The incidence of thrombocytopenia and anemia was greater with ruxolitinib. (Funded by Novartis and Incyte; REACH3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03112603.).

Mini-dose methotrexate combined with methylprednisolone for the initial treatment of acute GVHD: a multicentre, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent unmet need for effective initial treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) adding to the standard first-line therapy with corticosteroids after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: We performed a multicentre, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study. Eligible patients (aged 15 years or older, had received allo-HSCT for a haematological malignancy, developed aGVHD, and received no previous therapies for aGVHD) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 5 mg/m2 MTX on Days 1, 3, or 8 and then combined with corticosteroids or corticosteroids alone weekly. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) on Day 10. A total of 157 patients were randomly assigned to receive either MTX plus corticosteroids (n = 78; MTX group) or corticosteroids alone (n = 79; control group). The Day 10 ORR was 97% for the MTX group and 81% for the control group (p = .005). Among patients with mild aGVHD, the Day 10 ORR was 100% for the MTX group and 86% for the control group (p = .001). The 1-year estimated failure-free survival was 69% for the MTX group and 41% for the control group (p = .002). There were no differences in treatment-related adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, mini-dose MTX combined with corticosteroids can significantly improve the ORR in patients with aGVHD and is well tolerated, although it did not achieve the prespecified 20% improvement with the addition of MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04960644).

Mesenchymal stromal cells plus basiliximab improve the response of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease as a second-line therapy: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD), effective second-line regimens are urgently needed. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as salvage regimens for SR-aGVHD in the past. However, clinical trials and an overall understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MSCs combined with basiliximab for SR-aGVHD are limited, especially in haploidentical haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). METHODS: The primary endpoint of this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial was the 4-week complete response (CR) rate of SR-aGVHD. A total of 130 patients with SR-aGVHD were assigned in a 1:1 randomization schedule to the MSC group (receiving basiliximab plus MSCs) or control group (receiving basiliximab alone) (NCT04738981). RESULTS: Most enrolled patients (96.2%) received HID HSCT. The 4-week CR rate of SR-aGVHD in the MSC group was obviously better than that in the control group (83.1% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.001). However, for the overall response rates at week 4, the two groups were comparable. More patients in the control group used ≥ 6 doses of basiliximab (4.6% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). We collected blood samples from 19 consecutive patients and evaluated MSC-derived immunosuppressive cytokines, including HO1, GAL1, GAL9, TNFIA6, PGE2, PDL1, TGF-ß and HGF. Compared to the levels before MSC infusion, the HO1 (P = 0.0072) and TGF-ß (P = 0.0243) levels increased significantly 1 day after MSC infusion. At 7 days after MSC infusion, the levels of HO1, GAL1, TNFIA6 and TGF-ß tended to increase; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Although the 52-week cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the MSC group was comparable to that in the control group, fewer patients in the MSC group developed cGVHD involving ≥3 organs (14.3% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.006). MSCs were well tolerated, no infusion-related adverse events (AEs) occurred and other AEs were also comparable between the two groups. However, patients with malignant haematological diseases in the MSC group had a higher 52-week disease-free survival rate than those in the control group (84.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: For SR-aGVHD after allo-HSCT, especially HID HSCT, the combination of MSCs and basiliximab as the second-line therapy led to significantly better 4-week CR rates than basiliximab alone. The addition of MSCs not only did not increase toxicity but also provided a survival benefit.

Three US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for chronic GVHD.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major immunologic complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. cGVHD involves multiple organs, reduces quality of life, and often requires prolonged therapy with glucocorticoids, causing severe side effects. After 4 decades of testing multiple therapeutic approaches, ibrutinib, belumosudil, and ruxolitinib were US Food and Drug Administration approved for cGVHD in the last 4 years. Here we put a spotlight on their mechanisms of action, studies that led to approval, and their future role in cGVHD.

BET-bromodomain and EZH2 inhibitor-treated chronic GVHD mice have blunted germinal centers with distinct transcriptomes.

Despite advances in the field, chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Because treatment options remain limited, we tested efficacy of anticancer, chromatin-modifying enzyme inhibitors in a clinically relevant murine model of cGVHD with bronchiolitis obliterans (BO). We observed that the novel enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitor JQ5 and the BET-bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 each improved pulmonary function; impaired the germinal center (GC) reaction, a prerequisite in cGVHD/BO pathogenesis; and JQ5 reduced EZH2-mediated H3K27me3 in donor T cells. Using conditional EZH2 knockout donor cells, we demonstrated that EZH2 is obligatory for the initiation of cGVHD/BO. In a sclerodermatous cGVHD model, JQ5 reduced the severity of cutaneous lesions. To determine how the 2 drugs could lead to the same physiological improvements while targeting unique epigenetic processes, we analyzed the transcriptomes of splenic GCB cells (GCBs) from transplanted mice treated with either drug. Multiple inflammatory and signaling pathways enriched in cGVHD/BO GCBs were reduced by each drug. GCBs from JQ5- but not JQ1-treated mice were enriched for proproliferative pathways also seen in GCBs from bone marrow-only transplanted mice, likely reflecting their underlying biology in the unperturbed state. In conjunction with in vivo data, these insights led us to conclude that epigenetic targeting of the GC is a viable clinical approach for the treatment of cGVHD, and that the EZH2 inhibitor JQ5 and the BET-bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 demonstrated clinical potential for EZH2i and BETi in patients with cGVHD/BO.

Treg-targeted IL-2/anti-IL-2 complex controls graft-versus-host disease and supports anti-tumor effect in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Modulating an immune response in opposite directions represents the holy grail in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) to avoid insufficient reactivity of donor T cells and hematologic malignancy relapse while controlling the potential development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), in which donor T cells attack the recipient's tissues. IL-2/anti-IL-2 complexes (IL-2Cx) represent a therapeutic option to selectively accentuate or dampen the immune response. In dedicated experimental models of allo-HSCT, including also human cells injected in immunodeficient NSG mice, we evaluated side-by-side the therapeutic effect of two IL-2Cx designed either to boost regulatory T cells (Treg) or alternatively to activate effector T cells (Teff), on GVHD occurrence and tumor relapse. We also evaluated the effect of the complexes on the phenotype and function of immune cells in vivo. Unexpectedly, both pro-Treg and pro-Teff IL-2Cx prevented GVHD development. They both induced Treg expansion and reduced CD8+ T-cell numbers, compared to untreated mice. However, only mice treated with the pro-Treg IL-2Cx, showed a dramatic reduction of exhausted CD8+ T cells, consistent with a potent anti-tumor effect. When evaluated on human cells, pro-Treg IL-2Cx also preferentially induced Treg expansion in vitro and in vivo, while allowing the development of a potent anti-tumor effect in NSG mice. Our results demonstrate the clinical relevance of using a pro-Treg, but not a pro-Teff IL2Cx to modulate alloreactivity after HSCT, while promoting a graft-versus-leukemia effect.

Impact of early cyclosporine A levels on acute graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using in vivo T-cell depletion.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Cyclosporin A (CsA) remains a major component of immunosuppressive regimens applied in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The impact of CsA trough levels during the first weeks after HSCT has not yet been investigated specifically in anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG)-based HSCT from matched related and unrelated donors. METHODS: To address this issue, we have retrospectively examined 307 consecutive matched related (n = 145) and unrelated (n = 162) HSCTs, using peripheral blood stem cells or bone marrow. HSCTs for active, uncontrolled malignancies were excluded. The initial three weeks' average mean CsA trough levels were analyzed in landmark and multi-state models, using a cut-off of 200 ng/mL. RESULTS: CsA levels >200 ng/mL were associated with a reduced risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade 3-4 at the first-week landmark (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.59, P = 0.03) and the second-week landmark (SHR 0.48, P = 0.004), whereas there was no impact at the third-week landmark (HR 0.87, P = 0.69). This was supported by a multi-state model, in which week 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, P = 0.006) and week 2 (HR 0.48, P = 0.003), but not week 3 (HR 0.80, P = 0.44) CsA levels >200 ng/mL were associated with a reduced acute GVHD 3-4 risk. Relapse incidence was not significantly affected by week 1 through 3 CsA levels. Despite ATLG's inherent GVHD-preventive properties, week 1 CsA trough levels >200 ng/mL following ATLG-based HSCT (n = 220) were associated with a significantly reduced risk of non-relapse mortality (SHR 0.52, P = 0.02) and improved overall survival (HR 0.61, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize the continuing importance of ensuring CsA levels ≥200 ng/mL immediately post-transplant in the setting of ATLG-based HSCT.

Clinical effects of tacrolimus blood concentrations early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Tacrolimus (TAC) plus short-term methotrexate (stMTX) is used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). TAC blood concentrations are frequently adjusted to enhance the graft-versus-leukemia/lymphoma effect or attenuate severe GVHD. Limited information is available on the clinical impact of these adjustments and the optimal time to perform them in order to achieve good clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 211 patients who underwent allo-HSCT at our institutes. RESULTS: Higher TAC concentrations in week 3 correlated with a significantly higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (P = 0.03) and lower nonrelapse mortality (P = 0.04). The clinical impact of high TAC concentrations in week 3 on CIR was detected in the refined disease risk index: low/intermediate (P = 0.04) and high (P < 0.01), and conditioning regimens other than cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation and busulfan/cyclophosphamide (P = 0.07). Higher TAC concentrations in week 1 correlated with a lower grade 2-4 acute GVHD rate (P = 0.01). Higher TAC concentrations in weeks 2 and 3 correlated with slightly lower (P = 0.05) and significantly lower (P = 0.02) grade 3-4 acute GVHD rates, respectively. Higher TAC concentrations in weeks 1 and 3 were beneficial for severe acute GVHD in patients with a human leukocyte antigen-matched donor (P = 0.03 and P < 0.01, respectively), not treated with anti-thymocyte globulin (P = 0.02 and P = 0.02, respectively), and receiving three stMTX doses (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical impact of TAC concentrations varied according to patient characteristics, including disease malignancy, conditioning regimens, donor sources, and GVHD prophylaxis. These results suggest that TAC management needs to be based on patient profiles.

High-dose individualized antithymocyte globulin with therapeutic drug monitoring in high-risk cord blood transplant.

BACKGROUND: Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and rejection are main limitations of cord blood transplantation (CBT), more so in patients with severe inflammation or previous rejections. While rigorous T-cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is needed to prevent GvHD and rejection, overexposure to ATG leads to slow T-cell recovery after transplantation, especially in CBT. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate high-dose, upfront ATG with individualized dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in pediatric CBT for patients at high risk for GvHD and rejection. STUDY DESIGN: Heavily inflamed patients and patients with a recent history of rejection were eligible for individualized high-dose ATG with real-time TDM. The ATG dosing scheme was adjusted to target a post-CBT exposure of <10 AU*day/mL, while achieving a pre-CBT exposure of 60-120 AU*day/mL; exposure levels previously defined for optimal efficacy and safety in terms of reduced GvHD and rejection, respectively. Main outcomes of interest included efficacy (target exposure attainment) and safety (incidence of GvHD and rejection). Other outcomes of interest included T-cell recovery and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included ranging from 2 months to 18 years old, receiving an actual median cumulative dose of ATG of 13.3 mg/kg (range 6-30 mg/kg) starting at a median 15 days (range 12-17) prior to CBT. Dosing was adjusted in 14 patients (increased in 3 and decreased in 11 patients). Eighteen (86%) and 19 (91%) patients reached the target pre-CBT and post-CBT exposure, respectively. Cumulative incidence for acute GvHD was 34% (95% CI 23-45) and 5% (95% CI 0-10%) for grade 2-4 and grade 3-4, respectively; cumulative incidence of rejection was 9% (95% CI 2-16%). Overall survival was 75% (95% CI 65-85%). CONCLUSION: Individualized high-dose ATG with TDM is feasible and safe for patients with hyperinflammation in a CBT setting. We observe high target ATG exposure attainment, good immune reconstitution (despite very high doses of ATG) and acceptable rates of GvHD and rejection.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide beyond haploidentical transplantation.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has practically revolutionized haploidentical (Haplo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Comparisons between Haplo with PTCy and unrelated donor (URD) with conventional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis have shown comparable overall survival with lower incidences of GVHD with Haplo/PTCy and led to the following question: is it PTCy so good that can be successfully incorporated into matched related donor (MRD) and URD HCT? In this review, we discuss other ways of doing PTCy, PTCy in peripheral blood haploidentical transplants, PTCy in the context of matched related and matched unrelated donors, PTCy with mismatched unrelated donors, and PTCy following checkpoint inhibitor treatment. PTCy is emerging as a new standard GVHD prophylaxis in haploidentical, HLA-matched, and -mismatched HCT.