Auditory Brainstem Response Pass Rates Correlate with Newborn Hour of Life and Delivery Mode.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hour of life and mode of delivery affect auditory brainstem response (ABR) results in healthy infants with a gestational age of >35 weeks. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study reviewed 31 984 infants tested during a standard birth hospitalization from 2014 to 2016 at Prentice Women's Hospital of Chicago. Per policy, ABRs were performed after 6 and 12 hours of life for vaginally and cesarean-delivered infants, respectively. Testing was repeated before discharge for infants who were referred once. For those infants who referred again, a third ABR was offered at no cost to families 10-14 days after discharge starting in 2016. RESULTS: ABR pass rates consistently and significantly increased with advancing hour of life at testing, starting at 10-11 hours of life for vaginally born infants and 30-32 hours for cesarean-born infants. This steady, incremental increase in the pass rate was maintained overall until the vaginal and cesarean groups reached plateaus at 42-44 and 48-52 hours of life, respectively. In 2016 and beyond, a third hearing screen after discharge lowered the referral rate to just 0.77%. CONCLUSIONS: This study of the results of ABR tests in over 30 000 well newborns demonstrates that delaying hearing screening until 10-11 hours for vaginally born infants and 30-32 hours for cesarean-born infants results in a statistically significant improvement in hearing pass rates.

[Analysis of results of concurrent hearing and deafness genetic screening and follow up of 33 911 newborns].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of concurrent hearing and deafness genetic screening and follow up of newborns. METHODS: In total 33 911 babies born to 5 designated hospitals in Nanshan District of Shenzhen city from October 2017 to December 2019 were included. All subjects underwent concurrent hearing and deafness genetic screening covering 21 variants of 4 genes including GJB2, SLC26A4, GJB3 and Mt12SrRNA. For those with positive results, Sanger sequencing was carried out for confirmation. RESULTS: 93.32% subjects passed the first-round hearing screening, and 87.01% passed the recheck testing. The overall detection rate was 4.18%. The detection rates for GJB2, SLC26A4, GJB3 and Mt12srRNA variants were 1.98%, 1.58%, 0.37% and 0.25%, respectively. 126 and 84 subjects were found with high risk for delayed-onset and drug-induced hearing loss, respectively. In addition, 4 and 5 subjects were found to harbor homozygous/compound heterozygous variants of the GJB2 and SLC26A4 genes, respectively. Concurrent screening showed that subjects (with heterozygous variants) who did not passed the two round hearing test were as follows: GJB2 with 6.75% in the first round and 2.61% in the second round testing, SLC26A4 (3.3%/1.2%), GJB3 (0.72%/0.14%) and 12SrRNA (0.36%/Nil), respectively. Moreover, the No-pass rate in the subjects with homozygous or compound variants in single gene, heterozygous variant in single gene, heterozygous variant in multiple genes, and homozygous variant in GJB3 gene were significantly higher than the subjects with negative results of genetic screening. CONCLUSION: Concurrent newborn genetic screening can enhance the effectiveness of hearing screening and enable earlier identification and intervention for children with hearing impairment. Follow-up can improve the diagnostic rate for children who are positive for the concurrent screening. Nevertheless, genetic and hearing screening cannot replace the diagnostic testing. It is necessary to conduct comprehensive analysis for the results of genetic and hearing screening and radiological examinations. Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing are critical for ascertain the diagnosis.

Effective Hearing Loss Screening in Primary Care: The Early Auditory Referral-Primary Care Study.

PURPOSE: Hearing loss, the second most common disability in the United States, is under-diagnosed and under-treated. Identifying it in early stages could prevent its known substantial adverse outcomes. METHODS: A multiple baseline design was implemented to assess a screening paradigm for identifying and referring patients aged ≥55 years with hearing loss at 10 family medicine clinics in 2 health systems. Patients completed a consent form and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHI). An electronic alert prompted clinicians to screen for hearing loss during visits. RESULTS: The 14,877 eligible patients during the study period had 36,701 encounters. Referral rates in the family medicine clinics increased from a baseline rate of 3.2% to 14.4% in 1 health system and from a baseline rate of 0.7% to 4.7% in the other. A general medicine comparison group showed referral rate increase from the 3.0% baseline rate to 3.3%. Of the 5,883 study patients who completed the HHI 25.2% (n=1,484) had HHI scores suggestive of hearing loss; those patients had higher referral rates, 28% vs 9.2% (P <.001). Of 1,660 patients referred for hearing testing, 717 had audiology data available for analysis: 669 (93.3%) were rated appropriately referred and 421 (58.7%) were considered hearing aid candidates. Overall, 71.5% of patients contacted felt their referral was appropriate. CONCLUSION: An electronic alert used to remind clinicians to ask patients aged ≥55 years about hearing loss significantly increased audiology referrals for at-risk patients. Audiologic and audiogram data support the effectiveness of the prompt. Clinicians should consider adopting this method to identify patients with hearing loss to reduce its known and adverse sequelae.

Risk factors for fungal infection in extremely low birthweight infants registered in the Korean neonatal network from 2013 to 2015: Male sex and hypotension.

BACKGROUND: In Korea, improvement in the survival rates of extremely low birthweight (<1,000 g) infants has led to neonatal infection, especially fungal infection (FI), in the neonatal intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for FI by analyzing the incidence of FI in extremely low birthweight infants in Korea. METHODS: Data from 5,320 very low birthweight (<1,500 g) infants registered from 2013 to 2015 in the Korean Neonatal Network were analyzed. The infants were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of FI. RESULTS: Among infants, 1,524 with gestational ages of <27 weeks and birthweights of <1,000 g were included. The incidence of FI was 7.3% (111/1,524) and mortality of the infants with FI was 40% (44/111). The mean gestational age of infants with FI was 24.8 ± 1.0 weeks, which was significantly lower than those without FI. After logistic regression, being male, and having hypotension within 7 days of birth were independent risk factors for FI. Moreover, hypotension was strongly associated with mortality in FI. Adverse outcomes such as severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, bacteremia, and abnormal hearing test occurred more frequently in infants with FI than non-FI. CONCLUSIONS: As male sex and hypotension within 7 days of birth increased the risk of developing FI in infants with gestational ages of <27 weeks and birthweights of <1,000 g, preventive strategies to reduce the incidence of FI are required for infants with risk factors for the development of FI.

Effects of vaginal birth versus caesarean section on hearing screening results in a large series from the Aegean region.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of caesarian section (CS) versus vaginal birth (VB) delivery techniques on results from neonatal hearing screening tests (NHSTs).Design: Retrospective analysis.Study sample: A total of 10,767 neonates divided into two groups according to delivery technique underwent NHSTs. Those who failed TEOAE or AABR were sent for diagnostic ABR examination.Results: A total of 5620 of 6044 (92.9%) of the neonates in the CS group passed the TEOAE test bilaterally and 424 (7.1%) failed either unilaterally or bilaterally. In the VB group, 4496 of 4723 (95.1%) neonates passed the TEOAE test bilaterally, while the remaining 227 (4.9%) failed the test either unilaterally or bilaterally. Bilateral passing rate of TEOAE test results was significantly higher in the VB group than the CS group (p < 0.05). The AABR failure rate (unilaterally or bilaterally) was 1% in the CS group, which was significantly higher than that in the VB group (0.6%). Diagnostic ABR bilateral pass rate was not statistically different between the groups.Conclusions: Delivery method was shown to affect the results of NHSTs. We found that the rates of failing the TEOAE and screening AABR examinations were higher among neonates born by CS compared to VB.

Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) for single patient cases: deriving statistical models from an expert-labelled data set.

Objective: Statistical knowledge about many patients could be exploited using machine learning to provide supporting information to otolaryngologists and other hearing health care professionals, but needs to be made accessible. The Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) were recently introduced for the purpose of integrating data from different databases by providing an abstract representation of audiological measurements. This paper aims at collecting expert labels for a sample database and to determine statistical models from the labelled data set.Design: By an expert survey, CAFPAs as well as labels for audiological findings and treatment recommendations were collected for patients from the database of Hörzentrum Oldenburg.Study sample: A total of 287 single patient cases were assessed by twelve highly experienced audiological experts.Results: The labelled data set was used to derive probability density functions for categories given by the expert labels. The collected data set is suitable for estimating training distributions due to realistic variability contained in data for different, distinct categories. Suitable distribution functions were determined. The derived training distributions were compared regarding different audiological questions.Conclusions: The method-expert survey, sorting data into categories, and determining training distributions - could be extended to other data sets, which could then be integrated via the CAFPAs and used in a classification task.

Establishing critical differences in ear-canal stimulus amplitude for detecting middle ear muscle reflex activation during olivocochlear efferent measurements.

Objective: Assessments of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) may have clinical utility. The MOCR is measured using contralateral inhibition of otoacoustic emissions but concurrent activation of the middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR) confounds test interpretation. MEMR activation can be detected using the change in ear-canal stimulus amplitude without versus with an MOCR elicitor. This study provides a description of how critical differences in ear-canal stimulus amplitude can be established.Design: Clicks were presented in right ears without and with a contralateral MOCR elicitor. Ear-canal stimulus amplitudes were measured. Two measurements without an elicitor were used to develop critical differences. MEMR activation was considered present if the difference in ear-canal stimulus amplitude without versus with an elicitor exceeded the critical difference.Study sample: Forty-six normal-hearing adults (mean age = 23.4 years, 35 females) participated, with data from 44 participants included in the final analysis.Results: Two participants exceeded the 95% critical difference. The 80, 90 and 99% critical differences are also reported for reference.Conclusions: Results suggest that the contralateral elicitor can evoke the MEMR in a small number of participants. The methods described in this paper can be used for developing equipment- and clinic-specific critical differences for detecting MEMR activation.

Association between speech perception in noise and electrophysiological measures: an exploratory study of possible techniques to evaluate cochlear synaptopathy in humans.

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether scores for a speech-in-noise test were associated with the results of two electrophysiological techniques mainly targeting low spontaneous rate, high-threshold auditory fibres.Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants were evaluated with the hearing-in-noise test (HINT), along with the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) with and without ipsilateral noise. The wave V/I amplitude ratio for the ABR without ipsilateral noise and ABR wave V latency shift in the presence of ipsilateral noise were obtained.Study sample: Twenty adults aged between 20 and 34 years (10 females) who did not report occupational exposure to noise were selected. All participants presented with normal hearing thresholds (0.250-8 kHz) and the presence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions, bilaterally.Results: A significant association between the wave V/I amplitude ratio for the left ear and the HINT scores for the left ear was found.Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, in normal-hearing listeners, the wave V/I ratio is associated with speech-in-noise performance, specifically in the left ear. This non-invasive procedure has the potential to be used in clinical populations who present with speech-in-noise difficulties despite having normal audiograms.

The relation of hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measures with speech perception measures and acceptable noise levels in cochlear implant users.

Objective: To investigate the relation of a hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) with speech perception and noise tolerance measurements. It was hypothesised that speech intelligibility in noise and noise tolerance may explain a larger part of the variance in PROM scores than speech intelligibility in quiet.Design: This cross-sectional study used the Speech, Spatial, Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire as a PROM. Speech recognition in quiet, the Speech Reception Threshold in noise and noise tolerance as measured with the acceptable noise level (ANL) were measured with sentences.Study sample: A group of 48 unilateral post-lingual deafened cochlear implant (CI) users.Results: SSQ scores were moderately correlated with speech scores in quiet and noise, and also with ANLs. Speech scores in quiet and noise were strongly correlated. The combination of speech scores and ANL explained 10-30% of the variances in SSQ scores, with ANLs adding only 0-9%.Conclusions: The variance in the SSQ as hearing-specific PROM in CI users was not better explained by speech intelligibility in noise than by speech intelligibility in quiet, because of the remarkably strong correlation between both measures. ANLs made only a small contribution to explain the variance of the SSQ. ANLs seem to measure other aspects than the SSQ.

Population-based age adjustment tables for use in occupational hearing conservation programs.

Objective: In occupational hearing conservation programmes, age adjustments may be used to subtract expected age effects. Adjustments used in the U.S. came from a small dataset and overlooked important demographic factors, ages, and stimulus frequencies. The present study derived a set of population-based age adjustment tables and validated them using a database of exposed workers.Design: Cross-sectional population-based study and retrospective longitudinal cohort study for validation.Study sample: Data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (unweighted n = 9937) were used to produce these tables. Male firefighters and emergency medical service workers (76,195 audiograms) were used for validation.Results: Cross-sectional trends implied less change with age than assumed in current U.S. regulations. Different trends were observed among people identifying with non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity. Four age adjustment tables (age range: 18-85) were developed (women or men; non-Hispanic Black or other race/ethnicity). Validation outcomes showed that the population-based tables matched median longitudinal changes in hearing sensitivity well.Conclusions: These population-based tables provide a suitable replacement for those implemented in current U.S. regulations. These tables address a broader range of worker ages, account for differences in hearing sensitivity across race/ethnicity categories, and have been validated for men using longitudinal data.

Pilot implementation of newborn hearing screening programme at four hospitals in southern Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and benefit of a universal newborn hearing screening programme at four different hospitals in southern Thailand, between January and July 2017. METHODS: One screener per hospital recorded demographic data of all newborns and their exposure to risk of hearing loss, and evaluated their hearing by transient otoacoustic emission technology. Those who demonstrated bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss at both a first and second screening were referred for diagnostic assessment. Those with confirmed hearing loss received treatment and regular follow-up appointments, and their speech development was assessed at 1 year of age. We determined effectiveness by comparing our achieved coverage and proportion of follow-up and referrals with benchmarks set by the American Academy of Pediatrics (≥ 95%, ≥ 95% and ≤ 4%, respectively), and determined benefit by calculating the composite language scores of hearing-impaired infants who received early intervention. FINDINGS: We screened 6140 eligible newborns, and achieved a screening coverage of 95.4% (5859/6140), lost 25.7% (63/245) and 22.0% (9/41) to follow-up at the second screening and diagnostic assessment stages, respectively, and obtained an overall proportion of referrals of 0.7% (41/6140). Twelve infants were confirmed as having hearing loss and received early intervention; nine (75%) demonstrated normal speech development by their first birthday. Our universal hearing screening yielded a prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss of less than 0.1% (3/6140). CONCLUSION: Although ineffective by American Academy of Pediatrics standards, we demonstrated the benefit of early intervention in infants diagnosed with hearing loss.

National quality evaluation of peri-surgical hearing care for pediatric otitis media with effusion.

OBJECTIVE: Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a common disease among children that can lead to grave sequelae with respect to hearing. Thus, when treating OME, appropriate hearing care should be provided; ventilation tube insertion (VTI), a standard approach for treating OME, is no exception. This study examined hearing care for VTI and its associated factors, especially at the national level. DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. SETTING: Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand one hundred and fifty-nine patients who received VTI (age ≤12 years; 2011-12). INTERVENTION: No intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance to guidelines: sufficient observation time (OBS), tympanogram before VTI (TYM-B) and hearing tests before and after VTI (HEAR-B and HEAR-A, respectively). RESULTS: The national proportions of completion for each procedure were 30.1% for OBS, 84.4% for TYM-B, 74.3% for HEAR-B and 36.0% for HEAR-A; those of OBS and HEAR-A were extremely low. Age, nasal allergy and even geographic area were associated with differences across completion patterns. Regression revealed some notable patterns. Compared with non-teaching hospitals, teaching hospitals administered HEAR-B most successfully (odds ratio [OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.06-9.63) and the smallest hospital group performed HEAR-B most successfully (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.14-7.46). CONCLUSION: Several findings surfaced concerning VTI-related hearing care and its association with many clinical and socioeconomic factors in this national study. These findings could serve as a map for improving hearing care quality among children with OME.

Early hearing slope as a predictor of subsequent hearing trajectory in a noise-exposed occupational cohort.

Variations in individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss have been observed among workers exposed to similar ambient noise levels but the reasons for this observation are poorly understood. Many workers are exposed to hazardous levels of occupational noise throughout their entire careers. Therefore, a mechanism to identify workers at risk for accelerated hearing loss early in their career may offer a time-sensitive window for targeted intervention. Using available longitudinal data for an occupationally noise-exposed cohort of manufacturing workers, this study aims to examine whether change in an individual's high frequency hearing level during the initial years of occupational noise exposure can predict subsequent high frequency hearing loss. General linear mixed modeling was used to model later hearing slope in the worse ear for the combined frequencies of 3, 4, and 6 kHz as a function of early hearing slope in the worse ear, age at baseline, sex, race/ethnicity, mean ambient workplace noise exposure, and self-reported non-occupational noise exposure. Those with accelerated early hearing loss were more likely to experience a greater rate of subsequent hearing loss, thus offering a potentially important opportunity for meaningful intervention among those at greatest risk of future hearing loss.

Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs): statistical and compact representation of rehabilitative audiological classification based on expert knowledge.

OBJECTIVE: As a step towards objectifying audiological rehabilitation and providing comparability between different test batteries and clinics, the Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) were introduced as a common and abstract representation of audiological knowledge obtained from diagnostic tests. DESIGN: Relationships between CAFPAs as an intermediate representation between diagnostic tests and audiological findings, diagnoses and treatment recommendations (summarised as "diagnostic cases") were established by means of an expert survey. Expert knowledge was collected for 14 given categories covering different diagnostic cases. For each case, the experts were asked to indicate expected ranges of diagnostic test outcomes, as well as traffic light-encoded CAFPAs. STUDY SAMPLE: Eleven German experts in the field of audiological rehabilitation from Hanover and Oldenburg participated in the survey. RESULTS: Audiological findings or treatment recommendations could be distinguished by a statistical model derived from the experts' answers for CAFPAs as well as audiological tests. CONCLUSIONS: The CAFPAs serve as an abstract, comprehensive representation of audiological knowledge. If more detailed information on certain functional aspects of the auditory system is required, the CAFPAs indicate which information is missing. The statistical graphical representations for CAFPAs and audiological tests are suitable for audiological teaching material; they are universally applicable for real clinical databases.

Objective methods to measure vestibular evoked myogenic potential response saccular tuning curves.

Objective: To detect cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) responses using objective statistical approaches and to apply this approach to estimate saccular frequency-tuning curves in volunteers and Ménière's disease (MD) patients. Design: Estimates of cVEMP threshold were carried out by 3 expert raters at 500 Hz and compared to objective threshold estimates (using Hotelling's T2 [HT2] and Fsp). Saccular tuning curves were objectively estimated. Study sample: Objective and subjective estimates of cVEMP response thresholds were compared for 13 normal hearing adults. Objective measurement of saccular tuning curves was explored in 20 healthy adults and 15 patients with MD. Results: Significant variability was seen between subjective estimates of cVEMP thresholds. Objective analysis with the HT2 test was more sensitive than 2 of 3 experts in detecting responses. The measurement time of cVEMP was considerably reduced with the HT2 test. Objective saccular tuning curves in volunteers showed strongest responses at 500 Hz. A flatter tuning curve was seen for MD patients. Conclusions: There is significant variability in subjective estimations of cVEMP thresholds. Objective analysis methods are more sensitive than subjective analysis, can detect responses rapidly and have potential to reduce variability in threshold estimates, hence they appear well suited to measure cVEMP tuning curves.

Irish School Entry Screening referral trends and cohort comparison with preschool specialist referrals.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse referral cohorts from School Entry Screening, Hearing (SHS) and Vision Screening (SVS) before and after documented changes. To compare referrals to pre-school specialists with subsequent group SHS outcomes. DESIGN: Randomized cohort, audit analysis of Community Nursing Developmental and SES records (CHRs), plus Audiology file review for SHS referrals. STUDY SAMPLE: Six hundred and sixty-eight mainstream pupils' CHRs were analysed in four birth cohorts, post-SES, using coded anonymized records. RESULTS: Significant referral rate differences existed between SHS and SVS. SHS, not SVS, referrals were impacted by nursing staff changes but not by SHS protocol changes. Preschool Audiology referrals outnumbered SHS referrals. All PCHI children with amplification were detected prior to SHS. SHS program yielded conductive hearing loss only. Similar SHS referral rates occurred for pre-school Speech Language Therapy referrals compared to children not referred; just 16% of pre-school Speech Language Therapy primary referrals were referred on to Audiology. CONCLUSIONS: SHS referral percentage fell slightly; SVS referral percentage remained unchanged. Low referral rates and low SHS hearing loss yield has modest impact upon Audiology services, but audiometrically screened referrals deserve higher priority. UNHS children born after 2011 create bigger Audiology service impact. International comparisons and European SHS research collaboration are encouraged.

Hearing tests are just child's play: the sound scouts game for children entering school.

OBJECTIVE: To create a hearing test useable without the involvement of a clinician or calibrated equipment, suitable for children aged 5 or older. DESIGN: The tablet-based app (Sound Scouts) includes tests of speech in quiet, speech in noise and tones in noise, all embedded in game designed to maintain attention. Data were collected to intelligibility-equalize the stimuli, establish normative performance, and evaluate the sensitivity with which Sound Scouts detected known hearing problems and identified their type. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants were children from age 5 to 14 (394 with normal hearing, 97 with previously identified hearing loss) and 50 adults with normal hearing. RESULTS: With pass-fail criteria set such that 98% of children with normal hearing passed Sound Scouts, 85% of children with hearing loss failed Sound Scouts (after exclusion of children in either group who received an inconclusive result or had incomplete results). No child with four-frequency average hearing thresholds of 30 dB HL or greater in their poorer ear passed Sound Scouts. Hearing loss type was correctly identified in only two-thirds of those cases where the algorithm attempted to identify a single type of loss. CONCLUSIONS: Sound Scouts has specificity and sensitivity sufficiently high to provide hearing screening around the time children typically enter school.

Validation of DPOAE screening conducted by village health workers in a rural community with real-time click evoked tele-auditory brainstem response.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the validity of DPOAE screening conducted by village health workers (VHWs) in a rural community. Real-time click evoked tele-auditory brainstem response (tele-ABR) was used as the gold standard to establish validity. DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was utilised to compare the results of screening by VHWs to those obtained via tele-ABR. Study samples: One hundred and nineteen subjects (0 to 5 years) were selected randomly from a sample of 2880 infants and young children who received DPOAE screening by VHWs. METHOD: Real time tele-ABR was conducted by using satellite or broadband internet connectivity at the village. An audiologist located at the tertiary care hospital conducted tele-ABR testing through a remote computing paradigm. Tele-ABR was recorded using standard recording parameters recommended for infants and young children. Wave morphology, repeatability and peak latency data were used for ABR analysis. RESULTS: Tele-ABR and DPOAE findings were compared for 197 ears. The sensitivity of DPOAE screening conducted by the VHW was 75%, and specificity was 91%. The negative and positive predictive values were 98.8% and 27.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of DPOAE screening conducted by trained VHW was acceptable. This study supports the engagement of grass-root workers in community-based hearing health care provision.

Evaluating hearing loss risks in the mining industry through MSHA citations.

A new noise regulation for the mining industry became effective in 2000, providing a consistent regulatory requirement for both coal and non-coal mining divisions. The new rule required mines to implement hearing conservation programs, including a system of continuous noise monitoring, provision of hearing protection devices, audiometric testing, hearing loss training, and record keeping. The goal of this study was to assess hearing conservation program compliance, and excessive noise exposure and hearing loss risks for both coal and non-coal mining divisions through evaluating MSHA citations. We analyzed 13,446 MSHA citations from 2000-2014 pertinent to 30 CFR Part 62. Descriptive statistics were generated and comparisons were made among mines of different commodities. In addition, one-way ANOVA on ranks was conducted to estimate the correlation between excess risks and establishment size. Results showed that 25.6% of coal mines and 14.7% of non-coal mines were cited at least once during this period of time. Larger numbers of noncompliance were seen in stone, sand, and gravel mines (SSG). Results also suggested inadequate efforts in both audiometric testing and minimizing risk after excessive noise exposure. Finally, establishment size of mine was correlated with the increasing risk of noncompliance. We anticipate that this study can guide resource allocation for preventing noise-induced hearing loss, and help improve risk management in mining.

[Auditory Processing Disorder: Is The Diagnosis Already Possible In First Graders?] / Auditive Verarbeitungs- und Wahrnehmungsstörung: Ist die Diagnose schon bei Erstklässlern möglich?

OBJECTIVE: Significant differences in performance on an eclectic German test battery for Auditory Processing Disorders (APD) was found in the most diagnostic tools between children with APD and controls in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th school year of primary education. Aim of the present study was to examine whether it is also the case for first graders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The performance in the behavioral test battery (including 14 specific auditory tests) was compared in two subject groups (aged 6-8 yrs): 41 first graders with APD of a clinical database, 37 typically developing first graders without APD (controls). RESULTS: Significant mean group differences were detected in the performance on 12 of 14 tests, because children with APD showed lower scores (excepted from two PaTsy-subtests: sound frequencies; sound intensities). The significance concerning the monaural threshold values narrowly retained statistical significance with Bonferroni correction. The controls mastered the PaTsy-subtests only in 86-89 % of all cases, children with APD in 73-83 %. The test scores of both boys and girls with APD were lower than those of their peers without APD. CONCLUSIONS: First graders with versus without APD could be significantly distinguished. Generally, there was seen a trend that in first graders the same performance was reduced as in elementary school pupils of higher grade level. For use in clinical diagnosis of APD, nonverbal auditory tests for the investigated specific age segment appears debatable.