Failure of abdominal wall closure after intestinal transplantation: Identifying high-risk recipients.

Open abdomen and fascial dehiscence after intestinal transplantation increase morbidity. This study aims to identify recipient and donor factors associated with failure to achieve sustained primary closure (failed-SPC) of the abdomen after intestinal transplant. We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 96 intestinal transplants between 2013 and 2018. Thirty-eight (40%) were adult patients, and 58 were pediatric patients. Median age at transplantation was 36.0 and 5.8 years, respectively. Failed-SPC occurred in 31 (32%) patients. Identified risk factors of failed-SPC included preexisting enterocutaneous fistula (OR: 6.8, CI: 2.4-19.6, P = .0003), isolated intestinal graft (OR: 3.4, CI: 1.24-9.47, P = .02), male sex in adults (OR: 3.93, CI: 1.43-10.8, P = .009), and age over four years (OR: 6.22, CI: 1.7-22.7, P = .004). There was no association with primary diagnosis and prior transplant with failed-SPC. Donor-to-recipient size ratios did not predict failed-SPC. There was an association between failed-SPC and extended median hospital stay (100 vs 57 days, P = .007) and increased time to enteral autonomy in pediatric patients. There is a relationship between failed-SPC and a higher rate of laparotomy (OR: 21.4, CI: 2.78-178.2, P = .0003) and fistula formation posttransplant (OR: 11.4, CI: 2.83-45.84, P = .0005) in pediatric patients. Given inferior outcomes with failed-SPC, high-risk recipients require careful evaluation.

Single centre experience of bilateral gracilis flap perineal reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision.

AIM: A variety of tissue flaps have been described for the closure of perineal wounds following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APE) or exenteration for locally advanced/recurrent rectal cancer and salvage surgery for anal cancer. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of the bilateral pedicled gracilis muscle flaps (BPGMFs) as a reconstruction option in these patients. This is of particular benefit when using a laparoscopic approach for the abdominal component of the operation, avoiding disruption of the abdominal wall and risk of herniation with other reconstruction options, e.g. vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. METHOD: This is a retrospective single centre case series of patients who underwent reconstruction of perineal defects using BPGMFs using a novel weave technique, from January 2008 to August 2017. RESULTS: There were 25 patients (16 female), with a median follow-up of 19 months (3-102). The indications for BPGMFs were cancer resection (21) and perineal hernia (4). The median length of stay was 14 days (6-60). All-cause mortality was 36% within the follow-up period. A healed perineal wound was achieved in 72% of patients within 30 days (84% of patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy). The overall donor site complication rate was 20% (including infection, dehiscence, numbness, haematoma and seroma) and 28% for the perineal site (including infection, dehiscence and prolapse). CONCLUSIONS: BPGMFs provide an important option for reconstruction of the perineum particularly with a minimally invasive approach or with two stomas.

Abdominal wall hernia in cirrhotic patients: emergency surgery results in higher morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis have a high incidence of abdominal wall hernias and carry an elevated perioperative morbidity and mortality. The optimal surgical management strategy as well as timing of abdominal hernia repair remains controversial. METHODS: A cohort study of 67 cirrhotic patients who underwent hernia repair during the period of January 1998-December 2009 at the University Hospital of Sao Paulo were included. After meeting study criteria, a total of 56 patients who underwent 61 surgeries were included in the final analysis. Patient characteristics, morbidity (Clavien score), mortality, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, MELD score, use of prosthetic material, and elective or emergency surgery have been analysed with regards to morbidity and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The median MELD score of the patient population was 14 (range: 6 to 24). Emergency surgery was performed in 34 patients because of ruptured hernia (n = 13), incarceration (n = 10), strangulation (n = 4), and skin necrosis or ulceration (n = 7). Elective surgery was performed in 27 cases. After a multivariable analysis, emergency surgery (OR 7.31; p 0.017) and Child-Pugh C (OR 4.54; p 0.037) were risk factors for major complications. Moreover, emergency surgery was a unique independent risk factor for 30-day mortality (OR 10.83; p 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Higher morbidity and mortality are associated with emergency surgery in advanced cirrhotic patients. Therefore, using cirrhosis as a contraindication for hernia repair in all patients may be reconsidered in the future, especially after controlling ascites and in those patients with hernias that are becoming symptomatic or show signs of possible skin necrosis and rupture. Future prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm this surgical strategy.

Small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia and survival after laparoscopic and open colonic resection (LAFA study).

BACKGROUND: Short-term advantages to laparoscopic surgery are well described. This study compared medium- to long-term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open colonic resection for cancer. METHODS: The case notes of patients included in the LAFA study (perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care) were reviewed 2-5 years after randomization for incisional hernia, adhesional small bowel obstruction (SBO), overall survival, cancer recurrence and quality of life (QoL). The laparoscopic and open groups were compared irrespective of fast-track or standard perioperative care. RESULTS: Data on incisional hernias, SBO, survival and recurrence were available for 399 of 400 patients: 208 laparoscopic and 191 open resections. These outcomes were corrected for duration of follow-up. Median follow-up was 3·4 (i.q.r. 2·6-4·4) years. Multivariable regression analysis showed that open resection was a risk factor for incisional hernia (odds ratio (OR) 2·44, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·12 to 5·26; P = 0·022) and SBO (OR 3·70, 1·07 to 12·50; P = 0·039). There were no differences in overall survival (hazard ratio 1·10, 95 per cent c.i. 0·67 to 1·80; P = 0·730) or in cumulative incidence of recurrence (P = 0·514) between the laparoscopic and open groups. There were no measured differences in QoL in 281 respondents (P > 0·350 for all scales). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colonic surgery led to fewer incisional hernia and adhesional SBO events. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR222 (http://www.trialregister.nl).

Surgery for incarcerated hernia: short-term outcome with or without mesh.

BACKGROUND: Incarcerated hernias represent about 5-15 % of all operated hernias. Tension-free mesh is the preferred technique for elective surgery due to low recurrence rates. There is however currently no consensus on the use of mesh for the treatment of incarcerated hernias, especially in case of bowel resection. AIM: The aims of this study were (i) to report our current practice for the treatment of incarcerated hernias, (ii) to identify risk factors for postoperative complications, and (iii) to assess the safety of mesh placement in potentially infected surgical fields. METHODS: This retrospective study included 166 consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated hernia between January 2007 and January 2012 in two university hospitals. Demographics, surgical details, and short-term outcome were collected. Univariate analysis was employed to identify risk factors for overall, infectious, and major complications. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (50.6 %) presented inguinal hernias, 43 femoral (25.9 %), 37 umbilical hernias (22.3 %), and 2 mixed hernias (1.2 %), respectively. Mesh was placed in 64 patients (38.5 %), including 5 patients with concomitant bowel resection. Overall morbidity occurred in 56 patients (32.7 %), and 8 patients (4.8 %) developed surgical site infections (SSI). Univariate risk factors for overall complications were ASA grade 3/4 (P = 0.03), diabetes (P = 0.05), cardiopathy (P = 0.001), aspirin use (P = 0.023), and bowel resection (P = 0.001) which was also the only identified risk factor for SSI (P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, only bowel incarceration was associated with a higher rate of major morbidity (OR = 14.04; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Morbidity after surgery for incarcerated hernia remains high and depends on comorbidities and surgical presentation. The use of mesh could become current practice even in case of bowel resection.

[The nature of postoperative complications in patients with peritonitis].

We studied the postoperative period in patients with peritonitis. The structure of the most important factors that slow down the healing process and lead to mortality. Among the factors that affect the healing process is the most important character of fluid, and the prevalence of peritonitis (causative factor), which causes complications on the part of the internal organs and wounds.

Global, regional, and national burden of inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernias: a systematic analysis of prevalence, incidence, deaths, and DALYs with projections to 2030.

BACKGROUND: Hernias, particularly inguinal, femoral, and abdominal, present a global health challenge. While the global burden of disease (GBD) study offers insights, systematic analyses of hernias remain limited. This research utilizes the GBD dataset to explore hernia implications, combining current statistics with 2030 projections and frontier analysis. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2019 GBD Study, focusing on hernia-related metrics: prevalence, incidence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) across 204 countries and territories, grouped into 21 GBD regions by the socio-demographic index (SDI). Data analysis encompassed relative change calculations, as well as annual percentage change (APC) and average annual percentage change (AAPC), both of which are based on joinpoint regression analysis. The study additionally employed frontier analysis and utilized the Bayesian age-period-cohort model for predicting trends up to 2030. Analyses utilized R version 4.2.3. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2019, the global prevalence of hernia cases surged by 36%, reaching over 32.5 million, even as age-standardized rates declined. A similar pattern was seen in mortality and DALYs, with absolute figures rising but age-standardized rates decreasing. Gender data between 1990 and 2019 showed consistent male dominance in hernia prevalence, even as rates for both genders fell. Regionally, Andean Latin America had the highest prevalence, with Central Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia noting significant increases and decreases, respectively. Frontier analyses across 204 countries and territories linked higher SDIs with reduced hernia prevalence. Yet, some high SDI countries, like Japan and Lithuania, deviated unexpectedly. Predictions up to 2030 anticipate increasing hernia prevalence, predominantly in males, while age-standardized death rates and age-standardized DALY rates are expected to decline. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis reveals a complex interplay between socio-demographic factors and hernia trends, emphasizing the need for targeted healthcare interventions. Despite advancements, vigilance and continuous research are essential for optimal hernia management globally.

Early use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors is an independent risk factor for incisional hernia development after liver transplantation.

Incisional hernias (IHs) are common complications after liver transplantation (LT) with a reported incidence of 1.7% to 34.3%. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the risk factors for IH development after LT with a focus on the role of immunosuppressive therapy during the first month after LT. We analyzed 373 patients who underwent LT and divided them into 2 groups according to their postoperative course: an IH group (121 patients or 32.4%) and a no-IH group (252 patients or 67.6%). A univariate analysis demonstrated that the following were risk factors related to IH development: male sex (P = 0.03), a body mass index ≥ 29 kg/m(2) (P = 0.005), LT after 2004 (P = 0.02), a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥ 22 (P = 0.01), and hepatitis B virus infection (P = 0.01). The highest incidence of IHs was found in patients treated with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (54.5%, P = 0.004). A multivariate analysis revealed male sex (P = 0.03), a pretransplant MELD score ≥ 22 (P = 0.04), and the use of mTOR inhibitors (P = 0.001) to be independent risk factors for IHs after LT. In conclusion, immunosuppressive therapy with mTOR inhibitors is an important independent risk factor for IH development after LT. To reduce the incidence of IHs, mTOR inhibitors should be avoided until the fourth month after LT unless their use is deemed to be strictly necessary.

The addition of lysostaphin dramatically improves survival, protects porcine biomesh from infection, and improves graft tensile shear strength.

BACKGROUND: Lysostaphin (LS), a naturally occurring Staphylococcal endopeptidase, has the ability to penetrate biofilm, and has been identified as a potential antimicrobial to prevent mesh infection. The goals of this study were to determine if LS adhered to porcine mesh (PM) can impact host survival, reduce the risk of long-term PM infection, and to analyze lysostaphin bound PM (LS-PM) mesh-fascial interface in an infected field. METHODS: Abdominal onlay PMs measuring 3×3 cm were implanted in select groups of rats (n=75). Group assignments were based on bacterial inoculum and presence of LS on mesh. Explantation occurred at 60 d. Bacterial growth and mesh-fascial interface tensile strength were analyzed. Standard statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Only one out of 30 rats with bacterial inoculum not treated with LS survived. All 30 LS treated rats survived and had normal appearing mesh, including 20 rats with a bacterial inoculum (10(6) and 10(8) CFU). Mean tensile strength for controls and LS and no inoculum samples was 3.47±0.86 N versus 5.0±1.0 N (P=0.008). LS groups inoculated with 10(6) and 10(8) CFU exhibited mean tensile strengths of 4.9±1.5 N and 6.7±1.6 N, respectively (P=0.019 and P<0.001 compared with controls). CONCLUSION: Rats inoculated with S. aureus and not treated with LS had a mortality of 97%. By comparison, LS treated animals completely cleared S. aureus when challenged with bacterial concentrations of 1×10(6) and 1×10(8) with maintenance of mesh integrity at 60 d. These findings strongly suggest the clinical use of LS-treated porcine mesh in contaminated fields may translate into more durable hernia repair.

[Prevention of small bowel fistulas during open abdominal treatment: lessons learned]. / Prävention von Dünndarmfisteln beim Laparostoma: Lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal vacuum therapy has simplified the treatment of a laparostoma. But is that all that it can achieve? The role of abdominal vacuum therapy concerning the development of small bowel fistulas is still under discussion. Treatment of the bowel surface seems to be crucial for the prevention of fistulas. As military surgeons, we need a simple, standardised regimen, leading to reproducible good results and low complication rates. The question is: are we able to eliminate small bowel fistula during open abdominal treatment? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 28  consecutive patients with open abdominal treatment in the period of 2004 to 2009. From June 2006 on, we implemented an algorithm, using the KCI V.A.C.® Abdominal Dressing (Kinetic Concepts Inc., San Antonio, Texas, USA) and a vicryl mesh between the non-adherent layer and the foam to prevent fascial retraction. The patients treated -after the installation of the new algorithm were compared to a group treated from 2004 to May 2006 before its installation. Fistula rates, mortality, the fascial closure rate, the number of abdominal dressing changes and the duration of open -abdominal treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: After implementation of our new algorithm, the fistula rate decreased from 45 % to 0 %. The mortality during open abdominal treatment decreased from 45 % to 6 %. In addition, the duration of open abdominal treatment was reduced as well as the number of dressing changes. The primary fascial closure rate was 87 %. CONCLUSION: We implemented a regimen, which is suitable for our mission in Afghanistan, as well as for medical evacuation and for the treatment of patients in our hospitals in Germany. It ensures a standardised treatment of the open abdominal cavity with an ideal protecting treatment of the bowel surface. Our algorithm utilises the advantages of the laparostoma while minimising the complications. The development of a small bowel fistula was eliminated in the evaluated patient group and mortality was clearly reduced.

[Temporary abdominal closure and early and late pathophysiological consequences of treating an open abdomen]. / Temporärer Bauchdeckenverschluss und pathophysiologische Früh- und Spätfolgen der Behandlung eines offenen Abdomens.

BACKGROUND: The open abdomen (OA) is a severe disease pattern accompanied by high morbidity and mortality. It is either result of a surgical dis-ease or approach. The aim of this review article is to provide a systematic overview on the options of a temporary closure of the abdominal wall including early and late consequences in the treatment of an open abdomen based on the current medical literature. METHODS: Topic-related, selective, PubMed-based literature search of the last decade including historically relevant references combined with own clinical experiences. RESULTS: The initial course is marked by problems in intensive care. The most frequent causes of -death are ventilatory problems, acute renal fail-ure, persisting infections and sepsis as well as multiorgan failure. Intensive care duration ranges from 13 to 65 days. Perioperative mortality is account-ed for 10-52 %. Specific complications can be seen in surviving patients such as enteroatmospheric fistula (1.3-41 %), ventral hernia (32-100 %), intraabdominal abscess formation (2.1-21 %), intestinal adhesions and digestion disturbances, neurological und psychological problems (approximately 20 %) as well as heterotopic ossification (17-25 %). DISCUSSION: Application of a temporary abdominal closure aims to avoid those complications. Furthermore, time and effort for care and treatment are recommended to be reduced as patients comfort should be improved, simultaneously. Primary fascial closure is of utmost importance to reach this goal. Procedures with highest fascial closure rate (Wittmann patch, STAR, 75-93 %; dynamic retention sutures, 61-91 %; V.A.C., 69-84 %) have lowest mortality. CONCLUSION: Type and severity of the various early and late consequences in the treatment of an open abdomen are substantially determined by the complication-inducing causes and the basic disease as well as by the options of an efficient, even in some cases temporary closure of the abdominal wall.

Risk of death after emergency repair of abdominal wall hernias. Still waiting for improvement.

PURPOSE: The precise importance of factors affecting morbidity and mortality in patients with complicated abdominal wall hernias undergoing emergency surgical repair has been not completely elucidated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicentric study of all patients (n = 402) with abdominal wall hernia who underwent urgent operations over 1-year period was conducted in ten hospitals. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate variables that affect morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of patients had inguinal hernia, 22% femoral hernia, 20% umbilical hernia, and 15% incisional hernia. Mesh repair was used in 92.5% of cases. Intestinal resection was required in 49 patients. Perioperative complications occurred in 130 patients, and 18 patients died (mortality rate 4.5%). Complications and mortality rate were significantly higher in the group of intestinal resection. Patients older than 70 years also showed more complications, required intestinal resection more frequently, and had a higher mortality rate than younger patients. In the logistic regression analysis, age over 70 years, intestinal resection, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III/IV class emerged as independent predictors of a poor outcome. Based in our results, we propose a simple schema to calculate risk of death in these patients. CONCLUSION: Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, probabilities of death after complicated abdominal wall hernia surgery are increased in patients with: age over 70 years, high ASA class, and associated intestinal resection. Guidelines should be developed to improve prognosis in these patients.

[Optimization of surgical treatment of median postoperative abdominal hernias].

The analysis surgical treatment results in 1187 patients. ageing 30-80 yrs old, in 2000-2009 period, for median postoperative abdominal hernia (MPOAH) is presented. Autoplasty was performed in 43 (3.6%) patients, suffering MPOAH of small and middle size without mm. recti abdomini diastasis. The "sub lay" method constitutes an optimal variant of alloplasty for MPOAH of small and middle size with mm. recti abdomini diastasis and of big size, and for giant MPOAH - the operations according to Ramirez method in our modification together with the net implants application. Intraabdominal hypertension was noted in 2 (0.8%) of 231 patients, suffering giant MPOAH, seroma--in 86 (7.2%), the wound suppuration - in 16 (1.3%). Pulmonary thromboembolism had constituted the cause of death in 2 (0.8%) patients, suffering giant MPOAH. Late results in terms 1-5 yrs were studied up in 520 patients. Chronic pain in the abdominal wall portion was noted by 17 (3.2%) patients and the hernia recurrence--7 (1.3%).

Outcomes of obstructed abdominal wall hernia: results from the UK national small bowel obstruction audit.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall hernia is a common surgical condition. Patients may present in an emergency with bowel obstruction, incarceration or strangulation. Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a serious surgical condition associated with significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to describe current management and outcomes of patients with obstructed hernia in the UK as identified in the National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction (NASBO). METHODS: NASBO collated data on adults treated for SBO at 131 UK hospitals between January and March 2017. Those with obstruction due to abdominal wall hernia were included in this study. Demographics, co-morbidity, imaging, operative treatment, and in-hospital outcomes were recorded. Modelling for factors associated with mortality and complications was undertaken using Cox proportional hazards and multivariable regression modelling. RESULTS: NASBO included 2341 patients, of whom 415 (17·7 per cent) had SBO due to hernia. Surgery was performed in 312 (75·2 per cent) of the 415 patients; small bowel resection was required in 198 (63·5 per cent) of these operations. Non-operative management was reported in 35 (54 per cent) of 65 patients with a parastomal hernia and in 34 (32·1 per cent) of 106 patients with an incisional hernia. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9·4 per cent (39 of 415), and was highest in patients with a groin hernia (11·1 per cent, 17 of 153). Complications were common, including lower respiratory tract infection in 16·3 per cent of patients with a groin hernia. Increased age was associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio 1·05, 95 per cent c.i. 1·01 to 1·10; P = 0·009) and complications (odds ratio 1·05, 95 per cent c.i. 1·02 to 1·09; P = 0·001). CONCLUSION: NASBO has highlighted poor outcomes for patients with SBO due to hernia, highlighting the need for quality improvement initiatives in this group.

ANTECEDENTES: La eventración es una enfermedad quirúrgica frecuente. Algunos pacientes acuden a urgencias por episodios de obstrucción intestinal, incarceración o estrangulación. La obstrucción del intestino delgado (small bowel obstruction, SBO) es una forma de presentación quirúrgica grave asociada a una morbilidad significativa. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir el tratamiento actual y los resultados de los pacientes con obstrucción herniaria en el Reino Unido identificados a través de la National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction (NASBO). MÉTODOS: La NASBO recopiló datos de los pacientes adultos tratados por obstrucción del intestino delgado en 131 hospitales del Reino Unido entre enero y marzo de 2017. En este estudio se incluyeron solo los que presentaron una obstrucción por una hernia de la pared abdominal. Se registraron los datos demográficos, la comorbilidad, los estudios de imagen, el tratamiento quirúrgico y los resultados hospitalarios. Se realizó una modelización de los factores asociados con la mortalidad y las complicaciones utilizando el análisis de riesgos proporcionales de Cox y modelos de regresión multivariable. RESULTADOS: De los 2.341 pacientes incluidos en la NASBO, 415 (17,7%) presentaron una SBO por una hernia. La edad media fue de 71,2 (DE 13,9) años, con una comorbilidad moderada (índice de comorbilidad de Charlson 4,6 (DE 7,1)). Fueron operados 312/415 (75,2%). Un total de 198/312 (63,5%) pacientes precisaron una resección del intestino delgado. Se planteó el tratamiento no quirúrgico en 35/65 (53,8%) de las hernias paraestomales y en 38/106 (32,1%) de los pacientes con hernia incisional. La mortalidad hospitalaria fue de 39/415 (9,4%), siendo más elevada en pacientes con hernia inguinal (17/153 (11,1%)). El desarrollo de complicaciones fue habitual, de las que destaca la infección del tracto respiratorio inferior en el 16,3%. El aumento de la edad se asoció con un mayor riesgo de mortalidad (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR 1,05 (1,01-1,10, P = 0,009)) y complicaciones (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR 1,05 (1,01-1,10, P = 0,009)). CONCLUSIÓN: la NASBO ha puesto en evidencia los malos resultados en pacientes con SBO por hernia, subrayando la necesidad de iniciativas para mejorarlos.

Transgastric ventral hernia repair: a controlled study in a live porcine model (with videos).

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair is currently performed via open surgery or laparoscopic approach. OBJECTIVE: To develop an alternative ventral hernia repair technique. SETTING: Acute and survival experiments on twelve 50-kg pigs. DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS: An endoscope was introduced transgastrically into the peritoneal cavity. An abdominal wall hernia was created through a 5-mm skin incision followed by a 5-cm-long incision of the abdominal wall muscles and aponeurosis. A hernia repair technique was developed in 3 acute experiments. Then animals were randomized into 2 groups. In the experimental group (5 animals) Gore-Tex mesh was transgastrically attached to the abdominal wall, repairing the previously created abdominal wall hernia. In the control group (4 animals), the hernia was not repaired. In both groups, the endoscope was then withdrawn into the stomach, and the gastric wall incision was closed with T-bars. The animals survived for 2 weeks and were then euthanized. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The presence of ventral hernia on necropsy. RESULTS: In the control group, the ventral hernia was present on necropsy in all animals. In the experimental group, the ventral hernia was easily repaired, with no evidence of hernia on necropsy. In the first animal in the experimental group, necropsy revealed infected mesh. After this discovery, we used sterilized cover for mesh delivery and did not find any signs of infection in 4 subsequent study animals. LIMITATION: The study was performed in a porcine model. CONCLUSIONS: Transgastric ventral hernia repair is feasible, technically easy, and effective. It can become a less invasive alternative to the currently used laparoscopic and surgical ventral hernia repair.

Strangulated groin hernia in octogenarians.

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to determine risk factors for morbidity and mortality in patients older than 80 years, compared to younger patients, who undergo emergency strangulated groin hernia repair. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent emergency surgery for strangulated groin hernia repair during 14 years. Patients were divided by age into three groups: younger than 59 (group A), 60-79 (group B), and older than 80 years (group C). Patient data included age, gender, hernia type, sac content, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included in the study. There was no difference between groups in sex, hernia localization, and the type of repair. More comorbidities were found in octogenarians compared to the younger patients [group C vs. D (A + B)]. Small bowel resections and ICU admissions were more frequent in patients over 60 years compared to younger patients, 19.6 and 32.7 % vs. 1.7 and 0 %, respectively. Surgery was longer in group B. The rate of postoperative complications, repeated surgery, length of admission, and mortality were significantly higher in octogenarian (group C). Multivariate analysis found that age is a significant factor in the occurrence of non-surgical postoperative complications, but not in surgical complications. CONCLUSION: Emergency surgery for strangulated hernia repair in patients over 80 years is more complicated than in younger patients, mostly due to the existing comorbidities. In order to reduce the high morbidity and mortality rates in emergency surgery associated with this age group, elective hernia surgery in elderly should be considered in selected patients with severe symptoms affecting their daily life.

Stoma-Const--the technical aspects of stoma construction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The construction of a colostomy is a common procedure, but the evidence for the different parts of the construction of the colostomy is lacking. Parastomal hernia is a common complication of colostomy formation. The aim of this study is to standardise the colostomy formation and to compare three types of colostomy formation (one including a mesh) regarding the development of parastomal hernia. METHODS/DESIGN: Stoma-Const is a Scandinavian randomised trial comparing three types of colostomy formation. The primary endpoint is parastomal herniation as shown by clinical examination or CT scan within one year. Secondary endpoints are re-admission rate, postoperative complications (classified according to Clavien-Dindo), stoma-related complications (registered in the case record form at stoma care nurse follow-up), total length of hospital stay during 12 months, health-related quality of life and health economic analysis as well as re-operation rate and mortality within 30 days and 12 months of primary surgery. Follow-up is scheduled at 4-6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months. Inclusion is set at 240 patients. DISCUSSION: Parastomal hernia is a common complication after colostomy formation. Several studies have been performed with the aim to reduce the rate of this complication. However, none are fully conclusive and data on quality of life and health economy are lacking. The aim of this study is to develop new standardised techniques for colostomy formation and evaluate this with patient reported outcomes as well as clinical and radiological assessment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01694238.2012-09-24.

Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia repair is a frequent surgical procedure, but perioperative risk factors and outcomes have not been prospectively assessed in large-scale studies. The aim of this nationwide study was to analyze surgical risk factors for early and late outcomes after incisional hernia repair. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective nationwide study on all elective incisional hernia repairs registered in the Danish Ventral Hernia Database between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2010. Main outcomes measures were surgical risk factors for 30-day readmission, reoperation (excluding recurrence), and mortality after incisional hernia repair. Late outcomes included reoperation for recurrence during the follow-up period. Follow-up was obtained by merging the Danish Ventral Hernia Database with the Danish National Patient Register. Results were evaluated by multivariate analyses. RESULT: The study included 3,258 incisional hernia repairs. Median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range 10 to 35 months). The 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates were 13.3%, 2.2%, and 0.5%, respectively. Advanced age, open repair, large hernia defect, and vertical incision at the primary laparotomy were significant independent risk factors for poor early outcomes (p < 0.05). The cumulated risk of recurrence repair after open and laparoscopic repair was 21.1% and 15.5%, respectively (p = 0.03). Younger age, open repair, hernia defects >7 cm, and onlay or intraperitoneal mesh positioning in open repair were significant risk factors for poor late outcomes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Elective incisional hernia repair were beset with high rates of readmission and reoperation for recurrence. Readmission and reoperation for recurrence were most pronounced after open repair and repair for hernia defects up to 20 cm. Additionally, sublay mesh position reduced the risk of reoperation for recurrence after open repairs.

Factors affecting morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent emergency operation for incarcerated abdominal wall hernia.

Patients with incarcerated abdominal wall hernias (AWHs) are often encountered in emergency care units. Despite advances in anesthesia, antisepsis, antibiotic therapy, and fluid therapy, the morbidity and mortality rates for these patients remain high. Between 2006 and 2011, we retrospectively analyzed the cases of 131 patients who underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated abdominal wall hernias. Of these, there were 70 women (53.4%) and 61 men (46.6%) with an average age of 63.3 ± 17.4 years (range, 17-91 years). Morbidity was observed in 28 patients (21.4%), and the mortality rate was 2.3%. Intestinal resection, presence of concomitant disease, and general anesthesia were the independent variants that affected morbidity of patients with incarcerated abdominal wall hernias.

Specific improvement measures to reduce complications and mortality after urgent surgery in complicated abdominal wall hernia.

PURPOSE: Morbidity and mortality are increased after urgent surgery for complicated abdominal wall hernia. We analysed prospectively early morbidity and mortality after implementing specific management measures in patients undergoing urgent hernia repair. METHODS: The study population included 244 patients with complicated abdominal wall hernia requiring surgical repair on an emergency basis over 1-year period. Patients were managed according to a protocol that included specific actions to be implemented in the pre-, intra- and postoperative periods. Outcomes of these patients were compared with those of 402 undergoing similar operations before development of the protocol. RESULTS: Patients in whom acute complication was the first hernia symptom had higher mortality (7.2% vs 2.5%; P = 0.07) and were consulted later than 24 h (49.4% vs 36%; P = 0.044). Patients consulting later than 24 h had higher mortality (8.1% vs 1.4%, P = 0.017). Femoral hernias exhibited specific characteristics and were associated with higher mortality (13% vs 1.6%; P = 0.001). Overall, both groups had similar mortality (4.5% vs 4.1%; P = 0.8); complications (38.8% vs 37.7%; P = 0.2), and bowel resection rates (12.2% vs 11.5%; P = 0.8). Excluding the group of femoral hernias, the measures achieved a lower rate of severe complications (21.2% vs 10.3%; P = 0.04) and a decrease in mortality (2.9% vs 0.6%; P = 0.05) after bowel resection. CONCLUSIONS: Specific measures for improvement of management and prevention of complications and mortality were effective in patients without femoral hernia. To reduce mortality, the best applicable measure is early detection and to prioritize the scheduled operation of femoral hernias and those affecting high risk patients. The implementation of preventive and educational programs in high risk patients is essential.