ABSTRACT
US Asian adults and people with limited English proficiency (LEP) confront mental health treatment receipt disparities. At the intersection of racial and language injustice, Asian adults with LEP may face even greater disparity, but studies have not assessed this through explicitly intersectional approaches. Using 2019 and 2020 National Survey of Drug Use and Health data, we computed disparities in mental health treatment among those with mental illness comparing: non-Hispanic (NH) Asian adults with LEP to NH White adults without LEP (joint disparity), NH Asian adults without LEP to NH White adults without LEP (referent race disparity), NH Asian adults with LEP to those without LEP (referent LEP disparity), and the joint disparity versus the sum of referent disparities (excess intersectional disparity). In age- and gender-adjusted analyses, excess intersectional disparity was 26.8% (95% CI, -29.8 to 83.4) of the joint disparity in 2019 and 63.0% (95% CI, 29.1-96.8) in 2020. The 2019 joint disparity was 1.37 (95% CI, 0.31-2.42) times that if the race-related disparity did not vary by LEP, and if LEP-related disparity did not vary by race; this figure was 2.70 (95% CI, 0.23-5.17) in 2020. These findings highlight the necessity of considering the intersection of race and LEP in addressing mental health treatment disparities. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.
Subject(s)
Asian , Healthcare Disparities , Limited English Proficiency , Mental Disorders , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Asian/psychology , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , United States , White/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Asians and Asian Americans have the lowest rate of mental health service utilization (25%) in the US compared to other racial/ethnic groups (39 - 52%), despite high rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. The lack of culturally-responsive mental health trainings hinders access to mental health services for these populations. We assessed the mental health priorities of Asian communities in Greater Boston and evaluated cultural responsiveness of the Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), a first-responder training teaching participants skills to recognize signs of mental health and substance use challenges, and how to appropriately respond. METHODS: This is community-based participatory research with the Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center (BCNC), Asian Women For Health (AWFH), and the Addressing Disparities in Asian Populations through Translational Research (ADAPT) Coalition. We conducted focus groups with community-based organization staff and community members to assess mental health priorities of Asian populations in Boston, MA. We then evaluated the utility and cultural-responsiveness of the English-language MHFA for Asian populations through pre- and post-training questionnaires and focus groups with community participants. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate questionnaire responses. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews. RESULTS: In total, ten staff and eight community members participated in focus groups, and 24 community members completed the MHFA and pre- and post-training questionnaires. Common mental health challenges in the Asian communities reported by participants were loneliness, high stigma around mental illnesses, academic pressure, and acculturation stress. Compared to pre-training, MHFA participants demonstrated lower personal mental health stigma (p < 0.001) and higher mental health literacy (p = 0.04) post-training. Participants also noted the lack of data statistics and case studies relevant to Asian populations in the training, and desired the training be offered in languages spoken by Asian ethnic subgroups (e.g., Chinese, Vietnamese). CONCLUSION: Cultural-responsiveness of the MHFA for Asian populations could be improved with the inclusion of data and case studies that capture common mental health challenges in the Asian communities and with translation of the MHFA to non-English languages predominant in Asian communities. Increasing the cultural relevance and language accessibility of the MHFA could facilitate wider adoption of these trainings across communities and help to reduce mental health stigma and gaps in literacy and service utilization.
Subject(s)
Asian , Community-Based Participatory Research , Emigrants and Immigrants , Focus Groups , Humans , Boston , Female , Asian/psychology , Adult , Male , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Middle Aged , First Aid/methods , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services , Cultural Competency , Mental Health/ethnology , Culturally Competent CareABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The overall aim of this study was to understand the experiences and perspectives of immigrant Muslim women in Quebec living with mental illness, who have recently used formal mental health services such as an accredited therapist, psychologist, or clinician. Specific objectives included (i) eliciting and examining their self-identified barriers and facilitators to recovery; (ii) exploring links between religion and mental health; and (iii) self-reported satisfaction with mental health services received. METHODS: We adopted a qualitative approach, facilitating the prioritization of participant perspectives. This involved semi-structured interviews with 20 women who (i) identified as Muslim; (ii) had used mental health services in the last three years; and (iii) were 18 + years of age. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. RESULTS: Three prominent themes emerged from the analysis. These themes were (i) stigma and misunderstandings in families (especially parents) and sometimes in the ethno-religious community, both acting as barriers to health service utilization and recovery; (ii) frustrating clinical experiences within formal mental health care settings, in particular a perceived lack of cultural and religious competence, which negatively affected service utilization and the development of a therapeutic alliance; and (iii) deeply-held religious beliefs, practices and trust in God imparting a rhythm, purpose and meaning, which were strong facilitators to recovery. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These findings suggest that recovery from mental illness can be advanced by a three-pronged approach in this population. First, anti-stigma mental health literacy interventions could be held in collaboration with Muslim community groups. Second, there is a need for further religious and cultural competence interventions, resources and trainings for mental health professionals working with Muslims. Third, self-care resources should be developed that harness aspects of religious practices that can give structure, meaning, purpose and hope. All this could ultimately foster recovery in this population.
Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Islam , Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Female , Islam/psychology , Adult , Quebec , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Patient Satisfaction/ethnology , Young Adult , Qualitative Research , Social StigmaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 Ethnic Inequalities in Mental health and Multimorbidities (COVEIMM) is a mixed methods study to explore whether COVID-19 exacerbated ethnic health inequalities in adults with serious mental and physical health conditions. We analysed data from electronic health records for England and conducted interviews in Birmingham and Solihull, Manchester, and South London. Sites were selected because they were pilot sites for the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework being introduced by NHS England to tackle race inequalities in mental health. Prior to the pandemic people in England with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) faced an 11-17-year reduction in life expectancy, mostly due to preventable, long-term, physical health conditions. During the pandemic there was a marked increase in deaths of those living with an SMI. AIMS: This qualitative interview study aimed to understand the reasons underlying ethnic inequalities in mortality and service use during the COVID-19 pandemic for adult service users and carers of Black African, Black Caribbean, Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi backgrounds living with serious multiple long-term mental and physical health conditions. METHODS: We took a participatory action research approach and qualitative interviews undertaken by experts-by-experience and university researchers Participants were purposively sampled by ethnicity, diagnoses, and comorbidities across three geographically distinct sites in England. Transcriptions were coded inductively and deductively and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Findings indicated multiple points along primary and secondary health pathways for mental and physical health that have the potential to exacerbate the unjust gap in mortality that exists for Black and Asian people with SMIs. Issues such as timely access to care (face-to-face and remote), being treated in a culturally appropriate manner with empathy, dignity and respect, and being able to use services without experiencing undue force, racism or other forms of intersectional discrimination were important themes arising from interviews. CONCLUSION: These poor experiences create systemic and enduring healthcare harms for racialised groups with SMIs that need to be addressed. Our findings suggest a need to address these, not only in mental health providers, but across the whole health and care system and a need to ensure more equitable healthcare partnerships with service users, carers, and communities from racialised backgrounds who are often excluded.
Subject(s)
Black People , COVID-19 , Caregivers , Caribbean People , Mental Disorders , South Asian People , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Black People/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , England/epidemiology , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities , Interviews as Topic , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Pandemics , Qualitative Research , Caribbean People/psychology , South Asian People/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Inequities in physical health outcomes exist for people with mental health and substance use conditions and for Indigenous populations (Maori in Aotearoa New Zealand). These inequities may be partly explained by poorer quality of physical healthcare services, including discrimination at systemic and individual levels. This study investigated the experiences of people with mental health and substance use conditions accessing physical healthcare and differences in service quality for non-Maori relative to Maori. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of people with mental health and substance use conditions in New Zealand asked about four aspects of service quality in four healthcare settings: general practice, emergency department, hospital and pharmacy. The quality domains were: treated with respect; listened to; treated unfairly due to mental health and substance use conditions; mental health and substance use condition diagnoses distracting clinicians from physical healthcare (diagnostic and treatment overshadowing). RESULTS: Across the four health services, pharmacy was rated highest for all quality measures and emergency department lowest. Participants rated general practice services highly for being treated with respect and listened to but reported relatively high levels of overshadowing in general practice, emergency department and hospital services. Experiences of unfair treatment were more common in emergency department and hospital than general practice and pharmacy. Compared to Maori, non-Maori reported higher levels of being treated with respect and listened to in most services and were more likely to report 'never' experiencing unfair treatment and overshadowing for all health services. CONCLUSION: Interventions to address discrimination and poor-quality health services to people with mental health and substance use conditions should be tailored to the physical healthcare setting. More needs to be done to address institutional racism in systems that privilege non-Maori.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Substance-Related Disorders , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Maori People , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/ethnology , New Zealand , Quality of Health Care , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/ethnologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe mental health service and psychotropic medicine use among a cohort of Aboriginal young people and quantify their relation to sociodemographic, family and health factors. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study with data linkage, 892 Aboriginal children aged 0-17 years living in urban and regional areas of New South Wales, Australia, were included. We assessed mental health-related service use, paediatric service use and psychotropic medicine dispensing claims covered by the Australian Government Medicare Benefits Schedule and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme from July 2012 to June 2017. RESULTS: Most children (71%) did not have a record of mental health service or psychotropic medication use. 18.7% had ⩾1 mental health-related service claim; 26.7% had ⩾1 paediatric service claim; and 20.3% had ⩾1 psychotropic medicine dispensing claim. General practitioner services were the most accessed mental health-related service (17.4%) and 12.7% had been dispensed attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medicines. Child characteristics associated with treatment included emotional and behavioural problems (prevalence ratio: 1.97, 95% confidence interval = [1.46, 2.64] for mental health services; prevalence ratio: 2.87, 95% confidence interval = [2.07, 3.96] for medicines) and risky behaviour (prevalence ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval = [1.12, 2.16] for mental health services; prevalence ratio: 2.28, 95% confidence interval = [1.54, 3.37] for medicines). Parent-related factors included chronic illness (prevalence ratio: 1.42, 95% confidence interval = [1.03, 1.95] for mental health services; prevalence ratio: 2.00, 95% confidence interval = [1.49, 2.69] for medicines) and functional limitations (prevalence ratio: 1.61, 95% confidence interval = [1.16, 2.24] for mental health services; prevalence ratio: 1.86, 95% confidence interval = [1.34, 2.59] for medicines). CONCLUSIONS: Most Aboriginal children and young people did not have claims for mental health services or medicines. Aboriginal children with emotional and behavioural problems, or parents with health problems were more likely to have mental health service or medicine claims.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Information Storage and Retrieval/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , New South Wales/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Indigenous people experience poorer mental health compared to the general population. Socioeconomic gaps partly explain these disparities. However, there is variability between populations and French overseas territories are understudied. This study examines the prevalence of mental health problems among Indigenous people in New Caledonia and French Polynesia, describing and comparing it with that of their counterparts while considering associated factors. METHODS: We used the data from the cross-sectional Mental Health in the General Population survey in the only 3 sites for which information on indigenous status was available: Noumea (2006) and the 'Bush' (2008) in New Caledonia, and French Polynesia (2015-2017). Current mental health issues were screened using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. In multivariable analyses, we considered the following factors: gender, age, education level, marital status, occupational activity and monthly income. RESULTS: Overall, 2294 participants were analysed. Among the 1379 indigenous participants, 52.3% had at least one mental health issue. The prevalence of depressive disorder (18.0% vs 11.7%), alcohol use disorder (16.7% vs 11.7%) and suicide risk (22.3% vs 16.7%) were higher among indigenous participants compared to non-indigenous participants. After adjustment, the association between indigenous status and these mental health issues did not persist, except for alcohol use disorder. CONCLUSION: We found higher prevalence of depressive disorder, alcohol use disorder and suicide risk among indigenous people of French Polynesia and New Caledonia compared to their counterparts. These differences seemed largely explained by socioeconomic disparities. Future studies could explore the use of and access to healthcare by indigenous populations.
Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Mental Disorders , Pacific Island People , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Alcoholism/ethnology , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder/ethnology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/ethnology , New Caledonia/epidemiology , New Caledonia/ethnology , Polynesia/ethnology , Polynesia/epidemiology , Prevalence , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/ethnology , Pacific Island People/psychologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Research is beginning to examine the health outcomes of migrators of the Great Migration, a movement of up to eight million African Americans from the South to the North and West during the twentieth century. However, sparse evidence exists studying the health outcomes of the descendants of Great Migration movers. The aim for this study was to compare the lifetime prevalence of mental health disorders by migration status. METHODS: We used a sample of 3183 African American adults from the National Survey of American Life (2001-2003). Using birthplaces of participants and their mothers, we classified adults as (1) Southern stayers, (2) migrators to the South, (3) migrators to the North or (4) Northern stayers. The outcomes were lifetime prevalence of any mental health, mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders. We used weighted log-Poisson regression models and adjusted for demographic characteristics and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Migrators to the North and Northern stayers had higher risks of any lifetime mental health, mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders compared to Southern stayers in the adjusted models. Migrators to the North and Northern stayers were more likely to report perceived discrimination. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that migrating families to the North may have experienced mental health adversities.
Subject(s)
Black or African American , Human Migration , Mental Disorders , Mental Health , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Black or African American/psychology , Health Surveys , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Mood Disorders/ethnology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Prevalence , Socioeconomic Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/ethnology , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: There are discrepancies in mental health treatment outcomes between ethnic groups, which may differ between genders. NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression provide evidence-based psychological therapies for common mental disorders. This study examines the intersection between ethnicity and gender as factors associated with psychological treatment outcomes. Aims were to explore by gender: (1) differences in psychological treatment outcomes for minoritized ethnic people compared to White-British people, (2) whether differences are observed when controlling for clinical and socio-demographic factors associated with outcomes, and (3) whether organization-level factors moderate differences in outcomes between ethnic groups. METHODS: Patient data from eight NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression services (n = 98,063) was used to explore associations between ethnicity and outcomes, using logistic regression. Stratified subsamples were used to separately explore factors associated with outcomes for males and females. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, Asian (OR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.78; 0.87], p < .001, 'Other' (OR = 0.79 [95%CI 0.72-0.87], p < .001) and White-other (0.93 [95%CI 0.89-0.97], p < .001) ethnic groups were less likely to reliably recover than White-British people. Asian (OR = 1.48 [95% CI 1.35-1.62], p < .001), Mixed (OR = 1.18 [95% CI 1.05-1.34], p = .008), 'Other' (OR = 1.60 [95% CI 1.38-1.84], p < .001) and White-other (OR = 1.18 [95% CI 1.09-1.28], p < .001) groups were more likely to experience a reliable deterioration in symptoms. Poorer outcomes for these groups were consistent across genders. There was some evidence of interactions between ethnic groups and organization-level factors impacting outcomes, but findings were limited. CONCLUSIONS: Across genders, Asian, 'Other' and White-other groups experienced worse treatment outcomes across several measures in adjusted models. Reducing waiting times or offering more treatment sessions might lead to increased engagement and reduced drop-out for some patient groups.
Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Mental Disorders , Psychotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anxiety/ethnology , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/ethnology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Depression/therapy , Depression/ethnology , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Depressive Disorder/ethnology , Ethnicity/psychology , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom , White People/psychology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Mental illness and obesity (MH-OB) may co-occur in adolescence and have a strong risk to track into adulthood. Using an intersectional framework, we explored associations between ethnic-sexual identities and MH-OB comorbidity in adolescents. We examined the risk of self-harm (SH) and attempted suicide (AS) by comorbidity status and ethnic-sexual identities. METHODS: Participants included 9,789 adolescents (aged 17 years) from the UK-wide Millennium Cohort Study with data on self-identified ethnicity and sexuality. Participants were categorised as White-heterosexual, White-sexual minority (SM), Ethnic Minority (EM) heterosexual or EM-SM adolescents. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between 1.dual ethnic-sexual identities and MH-OB comorbidity, 2.risk for self-harm (or attempted suicide) in relation to comorbidity and ethnic-sexual identities (including interactions between the comorbidity and ethnic-sexual identities variables to assess whether risk for self-harm differed by ethnic-sexual identities and comorbidity status). RESULTS: Comorbidity was higher among White-SM (OR = 3.73, 95%CI 2.42-5.75) and EM-SM (OR = 1.96, 1.03-3.73) adolescents. SM identities (OR = 3.02, 2.41-3.78 for White-SM) and having comorbidity (OR = 2.83, 2.03-3.95) were independently associated with SH or AS. Risk of SH among White-heterosexual individuals was greater among comorbid individuals (40%) relative to non-comorbid individuals (19%). Risk of SH was higher in SM individuals (58% vs. 41% in White-SM and 50% vs. 29% in EM-SM individuals with and without comorbidity, respectively). Risk of AS was 5% and 19% in comorbid and non-comorbid White-heterosexual individuals, respectively; the corresponding figures for White-SM individuals were 14% and 17%. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of ethnicity, SM adolescents have a significantly greater risk of SH and AS. Comorbidity further amplifies this risk.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Obesity , Self-Injurious Behavior , Suicide, Attempted , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/psychology , Logistic Models , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/ethnology , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/psychology , Risk Factors , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/ethnology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychology , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Attempted/ethnology , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , White People/psychologyABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study is to explore how immigrant women and men from India construct mental health and mental illness in the perinatal period. DESIGN: Qualitative interpretive design. METHODS: Data were collected by conducting in-depth interviews with 19 participants. Photo elicitation, free listing and pile sorting were used during the interviews. Purposive sampling was used, and data were collected in 2018 and 2019. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. FINDING/RESULTS: One major theme and three subthemes were identified. 'We do not talk about it' was the major theme and the subthemes: (1) 'living peacefully and feeling happy' described the views on mental health; (2) 'that's the elephant in the room still' captures how participants felt when talking about mental illness; and (3) 'why don't we talk about it' offers reasons why the Indian community does not talk about mental health and illness. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study have highlighted the importance of understanding the impact of immigration and being culturally sensitive when assessing mental health in the perinatal period. IMPACT: The findings of this study identify some of the reasons for non-disclosure of mental health issues by immigrants. Incorporating these findings during psychosocial assessment by health professionals in the perinatal period will help translate the cultural aspects into more effective communication. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and public contribution to the study was provided by the Community Stakeholders Group; these were members of the immigrant community from India who had expertise in mental health. They contributed to the study design and the key terms and phrases for the free list used in interviews.
Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Mental Disorders , Mental Health , Qualitative Research , Humans , Female , India/ethnology , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Adult , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Male , Mental Health/ethnology , Pregnancy , Young AdultABSTRACT
Contemporary American Indian communities experience a disproportionately high rate of specific mental health concerns, including psychiatric disorders as defined by professional psychology. Although integrating mainstream mental health services and Indigenous traditional healing (ITH) has been presented as a promising approach to addressing these inequities, such integration necessitates in-depth exploration and consideration of ITH. To that effect, this article provides a thematic analysis of an interview with an urban American Indian traditional healer who reflected on more than 4 decades of therapeutic experience. Based on this analysis, we identified two major themes. The first theme, Expansive View of ITH, reflects this healer's conceptualization and understanding of the therapeutic process while the second theme, Guiding Principles of ITH, explicates the foundational commitments that shape and guide this healer's application and practice of ITH. These insights reinforce previous observations made by scholars of Indigenous health and well-being that challenge dominant Euro-American perspectives and call for transformative change in psychology research and practice, advocating for professional consideration of a broader range of therapeutic rationales, traditions, and practices than what is common within the field. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
Medicine, Traditional , Humans , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Adult , Mental Health Services , American Indian or Alaska Native/psychology , Female , Male , Indians, North American/psychology , Health Services, Indigenous , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
Refugees and asylum seekers who identify as sexual minorities and/or who have been persecuted for same-sex acts maneuver through multiple oppressive systems at all stages of migration. Sexual minority refugees and asylum seekers (SM RAS) report experiencing a greater number of persecutory experiences and worse mental health symptoms than refugees and asylum seekers persecuted for reasons other than their sexual orientation (non-SM RAS). SM RAS are growing in numbers, report a need and desire for mental health treatment, and are often referred to therapy during the asylum process. However, little research has been conducted on the treatment needs of SM RAS in therapy or the strategies therapists use to address these needs. This study sought to identify these factors through qualitative interviews with providers at a specialty refugee mental health clinic (N = 11), who had experience treating both SM RAS and non-SM RAS. Interviews were transcribed and coded for themes of similarities and differences between SM RAS and non-SM RAS observed during treatment and factors that could be leveraged to reduce mental health disparities between SM RAS and non-SM RAS. Clinicians reported that compared to the non-SM RAS, SM RAS reported greater childhood trauma exposure, increased isolation, decreased support, identity-related shame, difficulty trusting others, and continued discrimination due to their SM identitiy. Suggested adaptations included reducing isolation, preparing for ongoing identity-based challenges, creating safe spaces to express SM identity, and a slower treatment pace. Providers reported benefits and drawbacks to centering the client's SM identity in treatment and encouraging community involvement for SM RAS, and noted additional training in cultural awareness would be beneficial. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
Refugees , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Humans , Refugees/psychology , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychology , Male , Female , Adult , Qualitative Research , Middle Aged , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities , Mental Health Services , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/ethnologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Latinx immigrant youth are at greater risk for mental health (MH) concerns than their nonimmigrant Latinx peers. Efforts to address mental health disparities have resulted in the much-needed development of theoretical frameworks explaining mental health disparities in marginalized populations. A theoretical framework that is particularly relevant to mental health disparities among Latinx immigrant youth is the Cultural Stress Theory (CST); however, an expansion of this model is necessary to thoroughly describe and explain mental health risk in this population. METHOD: This article integrates two frameworks-Toxic Stress Theory and the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities research framework-with CST to better explain mental health risk in Latinx immigrant youth. In doing so, we propose an expanded model that seeks to build on the strengths of CST in two important ways-expanding the breadth of relevant ecological domains and emphasizing the continued focus on specific mechanisms and their associations across levels. RESULTS: The proposed expanded CST model acknowledges a range of influences from the broad systemic and sociopolitical level to the biological level to comprehensively guide research that can better explain mental health risk in Latinx immigrant youth. CONCLUSIONS: An expanded CST model that incorporates the two highlighted frameworks can elucidate additional mechanisms by which cultural stressors influence mental health risk in Latinx immigrant youth. Such mechanistic work holds the key to effectively reducing mental health disparities for Latinx immigrant youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Hispanic or Latino , Mental Health , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Adolescent , Stress, Psychological/ethnology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Mental Health/ethnology , Female , Male , United States , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/psychologyABSTRACT
Cultural beliefs influence the perceived cause, methods of diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses. A qualitative study was conducted among traditional health practitioners (THPs) in the Harry Gwala District Municipality to further explore this influence. Purposive sampling assisted in the recruitment of 31 participants (9 males and 22 females). The four key themes this study investigated in relation to mental illness included its causes, methods of diagnosis, common symptoms observed and treatment approaches used by THPs, and the system of patient management. Culturally, mental illness was reported to be caused by witchcraft and an ancestral calling in this study. Mental illness was predominantly diagnosed by spiritual intervention which included divination through consultation with the ancestors, familial background, burning of incense which can also be part of communicating with the ancestors and through examining the patient. The common symptoms included aggression, hallucination and unresponsiveness. Prevalent modes of treatment included the use of a medicinal concoction and performing cultural rituals where ancestors and other spirits were assumed influential. The duration of the treatment process was dependent on guidance from the ancestors. Most causal aspects of mental illness from diagnosis to treatment seemed to be influenced by cultural beliefs and ancestors.
Subject(s)
Medicine, African Traditional , Mental Disorders , Qualitative Research , Humans , Male , Female , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Adult , South Africa/ethnology , Middle Aged , Culture , Traditional Medicine PractitionersABSTRACT
This article explores the experiences of Mexican American mothers who, confronted with the troubled emotions and behaviors of their adolescent children, felt compelled to seek help from mental health clinicians. Their experience is situated in the context of both psychiatrization, or the tendency to treat social problems as mental illness, and the landscape of contemporary mothering in the U.S., where maternal determinism, mother-blame, and the demand for intensive parenting hold sway. In this context, the moral crisis of mental health care-seeking for their children forces mothers to reconcile multiple competing stakes as they navigate the overlapping, and sometimes conflicting, moral-cultural worlds constituted by family and community, as well as mental health care providers. At the same time, it allows them an opportunity to creatively "reenvision" their ways of being mothers and persons. Their stories and struggles shed new light on contemporary conversations about psychiatrization, everyday morality, and mothering.
Subject(s)
Mexican Americans , Morals , Mothers , Humans , Mothers/psychology , Female , Adolescent , Mexican Americans/psychology , Adult , Mother-Child Relations/ethnology , Mental Health Services , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/ethnology , United States , Parenting/ethnology , Parenting/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychologyABSTRACT
Following the U.S. military's departure from Afghanistan, a significant number of Afghan refugees have resettled in the United States, presenting complex mental health challenges exacerbated by extensive traumatic exposure. This demographic is particularly affected by collective trauma due to war, genocide, and the loss of homeland. However, detailed investigations into the correlations between collective trauma and mental health outcomes among Afghan refugees are limited. This study sought to explore the relationship between collective trauma and mental health outcomes within the Afghan refugee population in the United States, paying particular attention to the influence of sociodemographic factors. Identifying subgroups at greater risk allows for the development of more targeted mental health interventions. The study surveyed 173 Afghan refugees employing snowball sampling, utilizing a cross-sectional design. Data collection was facilitated through online and in-person surveys in English, Dari, and Pashto. Key measures included the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire for individual trauma experiences, the Historical Loss Scale for collective trauma, the Historical Loss Associated Symptoms Scale for collective trauma symptoms, the Afghan Symptom Checklist-22 for mental health symptoms, and the Post-Migration Living Difficulties Scale for post-migration stressors. Statistical analyses involved Pearson's correlation for variable associations, with nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests conducted to assess sociodemographic impacts due to data's non-normal distribution. The analysis revealed significant variations in collective trauma and mental health outcomes across subgroups. Afghan women, minoritized ethnic groups, those who experienced extended displacement, and refugees with uncertain visa statuses reported higher collective trauma levels and worse mental health outcomes. Statistical significance was noted in the correlations between collective trauma and mental health symptoms (r = .53, p < .01) and between post-migration difficulties and mental health (r = .33, p < .01). The disparities in mental health outcomes based on sociodemographic characteristics were significant, with nonparametric tests showing clear distinctions across different groups (Kruskal-Wallis H = 14.76, p < .05 for trauma experience by visa status). This study emphasizes the critical need for mental health interventions that account for the complex experiences of collective trauma among Afghan refugees, especially among identified subgroups. Tailoring mental health services to address the specific needs highlighted through disaggregated data can enhance support for Afghan refugees in the United States. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the relationship between collective trauma and refugee mental health, advocating for nuanced care strategies in resettlement environments.
Subject(s)
Refugees , Humans , Refugees/psychology , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Adult , Afghanistan/ethnology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Mental Health , United States , Adolescent , Surveys and Questionnaires , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/ethnology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Sociodemographic FactorsABSTRACT
Recent ethnographies have investigated self-care as a socially driven configuration of care. This analysis engages theorizing on the imagination to expose new social dimensions of self-care in cases of mental health as embodied and communal. Based on fieldwork across Canadian universities and in conversation with students, campus wellness providers, and a group of psychiatric epidemiologists seeking to understand the mental health treatment choices of students, this article examines how these different subjects activate what I call an imaginarium of self-care. Among young adults in Canada, mounting social ills that go therapeutically unaccounted for have relocated forms of self-care into the imagination through play and world-building in ways that challenge the distinction between material and speculative healing. Attending to the imaginative dimensions of self-care makes coherent the ways that young people are grasping for hope in a world that-when embodied-resists recovery.
Subject(s)
Anthropology, Medical , Mental Health , Self Care , Students , Humans , Canada , Students/psychology , Mental Health/ethnology , Young Adult , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Male , Female , Imagination , Universities , Hope , Adult , AdolescentABSTRACT
Aboriginal Australians experience disproportionately high rates of mental health problems as the result of European colonisation, and Western evidence-based treatment has been strikingly ineffective in improving the situation. Cultural Therapeutic Ways is a culturally specific healing and wellbeing practice framework developed by the Victorian Aboriginal Child and Community Agency that focuses on culturally based practices, trauma awareness, and self-determination. Despite wide recognition of the importance of these elements in Indigenous healing and wellbeing programs, its measurable empirical impact is currently unclear. This paper summarises findings from a systematic scoping review to ascertain the published knowledge base for Cultural Therapeutic Ways and the gaps in knowledge that can inform future evaluation. Forty-two studies of programs that applied Cultural Therapeutic Ways with Indigenous participants from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States of America were identified from the literature search. Services based on Cultural Therapeutic Ways contributed to healing and wellbeing because they create safety, strengthen cultural connections, develop empowerment and provide opportunities to release emotion, and increase social and spiritual support. As the review set out to determine the published evidence base for Cultural Therapeutic Ways, other effective approaches may have been overlooked. To develop the evidence base for Cultural Therapeutic Ways, service design must clearly describe target groups, whether the program is delivered by Aboriginal people, the processes of Cultural Therapeutic Ways utilised in service delivery, and how they are blended with Western approaches. Research efforts could also productively be focused on identifying or constructing culturally appropriate outcome measures.
Subject(s)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Humans , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Australia , Health Services, Indigenous/organization & administration , New Zealand , Culturally Competent Care , Canada , United States , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/ethnologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chinese migrants in the Netherlands have a higher prevalence of psychological complaints and on average report lower levels of happiness compared to the native Dutch. Meanwhile, they utilise mental health services less often. Which factors play a role in this is not fully clear. AIM: To provide an overview of the factors that influence help-seeking behaviour among the Chinese population concerning Western mental health services. METHOD: We conducted a systematic literature review in Embase, MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE and PsycINFO, following the Prisma guidelines. We included original studies on factors that influence the help-seeking behaviour of immigrant Chinese individuals regarding Western mental health care. RESULTS: We included 14 studies, among which 10 quantitative, three qualitative, and one mixed-method study. These were univocal about several cultural, practical, and demographic factors that influence the help-seeking behaviour of Chinese with mental problems in Western countries, although especially the demographic factors we found showed substantial differences among studies. CONCLUSION: The Chinese population in the Netherlands shows a number of common factors that delay access to Western mental health services, with often more severe symptoms compared to non-Chinese individuals. Given the identified practical factors, in addition to making mental health care more accessible, maintaining an open, individual and cultural sensitive approach remains of cardinal importance.