Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), a calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate has been a standard prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A phase 2 study indicated the potential superiority of a post-transplantation regimen of cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with hematologic cancers in a 1:1 ratio to receive cyclophosphamide-tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil (experimental prophylaxis) or tacrolimus-methotrexate (standard prophylaxis). The patients underwent HSCT from an HLA-matched related donor or a matched or 7/8 mismatched (i.e., mismatched at only one of the HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 loci) unrelated donor, after reduced-intensity conditioning. The primary end point was GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 1 year, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, with events defined as grade III or IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD warranting systemic immunosuppression, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause. RESULTS: In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was significantly more common among the 214 patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group than among the 217 patients in the standard-prophylaxis group (hazard ratio for grade III or IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, disease relapse or progression, or death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.83; P = 0.001). At 1 year, the adjusted GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 52.7% (95% CI, 45.8 to 59.2) with experimental prophylaxis and 34.9% (95% CI, 28.6 to 41.3) with standard prophylaxis. Patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group appeared to have less severe acute or chronic GVHD and a higher incidence of immunosuppression-free survival at 1 year. Overall and disease-free survival, relapse, transplantation-related death, and engraftment did not differ substantially between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing allogeneic HLA-matched HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 1 year was significantly more common among those who received cyclophosphamide-tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil than among those who received tacrolimus-methotrexate. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; BMT CTN 1703 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03959241.).

Abatacept for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation.

ABSTRACT: Abatacept plus calcineurin inhibitors/methotrexate (CNI/MTX) is the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved regimen for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis during unrelated-donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (URD-HCT). Using Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data, we investigated its impact in patients receiving 7/8 HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) or 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) URD-HCT between 2011 and 2018. Primary outcomes included day-180, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) for abatacept + CNI/MTX vs CNI/MTX, CNI/MTX + antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis (PT-Cy). For 7/8 MMUDs, day-180 OS (primary end point supporting FDA approval) was significantly higher for abatacept + CNI/MTX vs CNI/MTX (98% vs 75%; P = .0028). Two-year RFS was significantly higher for abatacept + CNI/MTX vs CNI/MTX (74% vs 49%; P = .0098) and CNI/MTX + ATG (77% vs 35%; P = .0002), and similar vs PT-Cy (72% vs 56%; P = .1058). For 8/8 MUDs, 2-year RFS for abatacept + CNI/MTX was numerically higher vs CNI/MTX (63% vs 52%; P = .1497), with an improved hazard ratio (HR) of 0.46 (0.25-0.86), and vs CNI/MTX + ATG (66% vs 55%; P = .1193; HR, 0.39 [0.21-0.73]), and was similar vs PT-Cy (68% vs 57%; P = .2356; HR, 0.54 [0.26-1.11]). For 7/8 MMUD and 8/8 MUD recipients, abatacept + CNI/MTX prophylaxis improved survival outcomes vs CNI/MTX and CNI/MTX + ATG; outcomes were similar to PT-Cy-based regimens. Abatacept + CNI/MTX may facilitate unrelated donor pool expansion for HCT.

Olokizumab versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The cytokine interleukin-6 is involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Olokizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 cytokine directly, is being tested for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In a 24-week, phase 3, multicenter, placebo- and active-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:2:2:1 ratio) patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate to receive subcutaneous olokizumab at a dose of 64 mg every 2 or 4 weeks, adalimumab (40 mg every 2 weeks), or placebo; all patients continued methotrexate therapy. The primary end point was an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response (≥20% fewer tender and swollen joints and ≥20% improvement in three of five other domains) at week 12, with each olokizumab dose tested for superiority to placebo. We also tested the noninferiority of each olokizumab dose to adalimumab with respect to the percentage of patients with an ACR20 response (noninferiority margin, -12 percentage points in the lower boundary of the 97.5% confidence interval for the difference between groups). RESULTS: A total of 464 patients were assigned to receive olokizumab every 2 weeks, 479 to receive olokizumab every 4 weeks, 462 to receive adalimumab, and 243 to receive placebo. An ACR20 response at week 12 occurred in 44.4% of the patients receiving placebo, in 70.3% receiving olokizumab every 2 weeks (difference vs. placebo, 25.9 percentage points; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 17.1 to 34.1), in 71.4% receiving olokizumab every 4 weeks (difference vs. placebo, 27.0 percentage points; 97.5% CI, 18.3 to 35.2), and in 66.9% receiving adalimumab (difference vs. placebo, 22.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 14.8 to 29.8) (P<0.001 for the superiority of each olokizumab dose to placebo). Both olokizumab doses were noninferior to adalimumab with respect to the percentage of patients with an ACR20 response at week 12 (difference, 3.4 percentage points [97.5% CI, -3.5 to 10.2] with olokizumab every 2 weeks and 4.5 percentage points [97.5% CI, -2.2 to 11.2] with olokizumab every 4 weeks). Adverse events, most commonly infections, occurred in approximately 70% of the patients who received olokizumab. Antibodies against olokizumab were detected in 3.8% of the patients receiving the drug every 2 weeks and in 5.1% of those receiving it every 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were receiving maintenance methotrexate, olokizumab was superior to placebo and noninferior to adalimumab in producing an ACR20 response at 12 weeks. Larger and longer trials are required to determine the efficacy and safety of olokizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. (Supported by R-Pharm; CREDO2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02760407.).

Pain Reduction With Oral Methotrexate in Knee Osteoarthritis : A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) are limited. Previous small studies suggest that the antirheumatic drug methotrexate may be a potential treatment for OA pain. OBJECTIVE: To assess symptomatic benefits of methotrexate in knee OA (KOA). DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done between 13 June 2014 and 13 October 2017. (ISRCTN77854383; EudraCT: 2013-001689-41). SETTING: 15 secondary care musculoskeletal clinics in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 207 participants with symptomatic, radiographic KOA and knee pain (severity ≥4 out of 10) on most days in the past 3 months with inadequate response to current medication were approached for inclusion. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral methotrexate once weekly (6-week escalation 10 to 25 mg) or matched placebo over 12 months and continued usual analgesia. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was average knee pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] 0 to 10) at 6 months, with 12-month follow-up to assess longer-term response. Secondary end points included knee stiffness and function outcomes and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 155 participants (64% women; mean age, 60.9 years; 50% Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 to 4) were randomly assigned to methotrexate (n = 77) or placebo (n = 78). Follow-up was 86% (n = 134; methotrexate: 66, placebo: 68) at 6 months. Mean knee pain decreased from 6.4 (SD, 1.80) at baseline to 5.1 (SD, 2.32) at 6 months in the methotrexate group and from 6.8 (SD, 1.62) to 6.2 (SD, 2.30) in the placebo group. The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed a statistically significant pain reduction of 0.79 NRS points in favor of methotrexate (95% CI, 0.08 to 1.51; P = 0.030). There were also statistically significant treatment group differences in favor of methotrexate at 6 months for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (0.60 points [CI, 0.01 to 1.18]; P = 0.045) and function (5.01 points [CI, 1.29 to 8.74]; P = 0.008). Treatment adherence analysis supported a dose-response effect. Four unrelated serious AEs were reported (methotrexate: 2, placebo: 2). LIMITATION: Not permitting oral methotrexate to be changed to subcutaneous delivery for intolerance. CONCLUSION: Oral methotrexate added to usual medications demonstrated statistically significant reduction in KOA pain, stiffness, and function at 6 months. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Versus Arthritis.

Postoperative radiotherapy in women with early operable breast cancer (Scottish Breast Conservation Trial): 30-year update of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant systemic therapy, and radiotherapy are the standard of care for most women with early breast cancer. There are few reports of clinical outcomes beyond the first decade of follow-up of randomised trials comparing breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy. We present a 30-year update of the Scottish Breast Conservation Trial. METHODS: In this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial across 14 hospitals in Scotland, women aged younger than 70 years with early breast cancer (tumours ≤4 cm [T1 or T2 and N0 or N1]) were included. They underwent breast-conserving surgery (1 cm margin) with axillary node sampling or clearance. Oestrogen receptor (ER)-rich patients (≥20 fmol/mg protein) received 20 mg oral tamoxifen daily for 5 years. ER-poor patients (<20 fmol/mg protein) received chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 50 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 every 21 days intravenously in eight courses). Stratification was by menstrual status (within or more than 12 months from last menstrual period) and ER status (oestrogen concentration ≥20 fmol/mg protein, <20 fmol/mg protein, or unknown) and patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to high-dose (50 Gy in 20-25 fractions) local or locoregional radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy. No blinding was possible due to the nature of the treatment. We report the primary endpoint of the original trial, ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence, and the co-primary endpoint, overall survival. Clinical outcomes were compared by the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) are reported, with no radiotherapy as the reference group. Failures of the proportional hazards assumption are reported if significant. All analyses are by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 1985, and Oct 2, 1991, 589 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (293 to radiotherapy and 296 to no radiotherapy). After exclusion of four ineligible patients (two in each group), there were 291 patients in the radiotherapy group and 294 patients in the no radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 17·5 years (IQR 8·4-27·9). Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence was significantly lower in the radiotherapy group than in the no radiotherapy group (46 [16%] of 291 vs 107 [36%] of 294; HR 0·39 [95% CI 0·28-0·55], p<0·0001). Although there were differences in the hazard rate for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence in the first decade after treatment (HR 0·24 [95% CI 0·15-0·38], p<0·0001), subsequent risks of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence were similar in both groups (0·98 [0·54-1·79], p=0·95). There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups (median 18·7 years [95% CI 16·5-21·5] in the no radiotherapy group vs 19·2 years [16·9-21·3] in the radiotherapy group; HR 1·08 [95% CI 0·89-1 ·30], log-rank p=0·43). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that patients whose biology predicts a late relapse a decade or more after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer might gain little from adjuvant radiotherapy. FUNDING: Breast Cancer Institute (part of Edinburgh and Lothian Health Foundation) and PFS Genomics (now part of Exact Sciences).

Osteosarcoma cell death induced by innovative scaffolds doped with chemotherapeutics.

Osteosarcoma (OS) cancer treatments include systemic chemotherapy and surgical resection. In the last years, novel treatment approaches have been proposed, which employ a drug-delivery system to prevent offside effects and improves treatment efficacy. Locally delivering anticancer compounds improves on high local concentrations with more efficient tumour-killing effect, reduced drugs resistance and confined systemic effects. Here, the synthesis of injectable strontium-doped calcium phosphate (SrCPC) scaffold was proposed as drug delivery system to combine bone tissue regeneration and anticancer treatment by controlled release of methotrexate (MTX) and doxorubicin (DOX), coded as SrCPC-MTX and SrCPC-DOX, respectively. The drug-loaded cements were tested in an in vitro model of human OS cell line SAOS-2, engineered OS cell line (SAOS-2-eGFP) and U2-OS. The ability of doped scaffolds to induce OS cell death and apoptosis was assessed analysing cell proliferation and Caspase-3/7 activities, respectively. To determine if OS cells grown on doped-scaffolds change their migratory ability and invasiveness, a wound-healing assay was performed. In addition, the osteogenic potential of SrCPC material was evaluated using human adipose derived-mesenchymal stem cells. Osteogenic markers such as (i) the mineral matrix deposition was analysed by alizarin red staining; (ii) the osteocalcin (OCN) protein expression was investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test, and (iii) the osteogenic process was studied by real-time polymerase chain reaction array. The delivery system induced cell-killing cytotoxic effects and apoptosis in OS cell lines up to Day 7. SrCPC demonstrates a good cytocompatibility and it induced upregulation of osteogenic genes involved in the skeletal development pathway, together with OCN protein expression and mineral matrix deposition. The proposed approach, based on the local, sustained release of anticancer drugs from nanostructured biomimetic drug-loaded cements is promising for future therapies aiming to combine bone regeneration and anticancer local therapy.

The Treatment of Burkitt Lymphoma With the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Protocol With Rituximab and Consolidative Autologous Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Intensive treatment approaches are required for adult patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL), although an univocal standard of care still does not exist. The use of frontline autologous stem cells transplantation (ASCT) is debated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2020, 50 patients with BL were treated with the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM). Treatment plan consisted of 3 blocks, A (ifosfamide, vincristine, methotrexate, etoposide, and cytarabine), B (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and doxorubicin), and C (vindesine, methotrexate, etoposide, and cytarabine), each repeated twice, every 28 days. Rituximab was given at day 1 each block. Intrathecal prophylaxis was given once per each block. ASCT was scheduled at the end of the 6 blocks after conditioning. RESULTS: Median age at onset was 38 years (range 16-72); stages III-IV disease was observed in 82% of cases; bulky disease occurred in 44% of the patients, with B-symptoms in 38%. Stem cell harvest was performed in 72% of patients, who all received a subsequent ASCT. The full 6 blocks treatment was completed in 70% of the patients. The overall response rate was 74%, with a complete response rate of 60%. Ten-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 83.7% and 76.0%, respectively, without reaching the median. Ten-year disease-free survival was 80.3%. Grades 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and mucositis were seen in 96%, 60%, 32%, and 24% of patients. Infections occurred in 60% of patients. CONCLUSION: Intensive treatment according to BFM protocol, with rituximab and ASCT, appears feasible, safe, and highly effective in adult patients with BL, as confirmed by long-term survival rates reflecting response maintenance.

Longitudinal Follow-Up of Fibrosis-4 in Patients at Risk of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Receiving Low-Dose Methotrexate Treatment.

Several noninvasive liver fibrosis tests have been developed and appear to predict the severity of fibrosis, possibly replacing invasive liver biopsy as a monitoring tool.1 The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score originally was proposed to help assess liver fibrosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus co-infection.1 FIB-4 has been used widely to monitor the severity of liver fibrosis, especially in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,2 now termed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).3.

Mini-dose methotrexate combined with methylprednisolone for the initial treatment of acute GVHD: a multicentre, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent unmet need for effective initial treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) adding to the standard first-line therapy with corticosteroids after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: We performed a multicentre, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study. Eligible patients (aged 15 years or older, had received allo-HSCT for a haematological malignancy, developed aGVHD, and received no previous therapies for aGVHD) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 5 mg/m2 MTX on Days 1, 3, or 8 and then combined with corticosteroids or corticosteroids alone weekly. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) on Day 10. A total of 157 patients were randomly assigned to receive either MTX plus corticosteroids (n = 78; MTX group) or corticosteroids alone (n = 79; control group). The Day 10 ORR was 97% for the MTX group and 81% for the control group (p = .005). Among patients with mild aGVHD, the Day 10 ORR was 100% for the MTX group and 86% for the control group (p = .001). The 1-year estimated failure-free survival was 69% for the MTX group and 41% for the control group (p = .002). There were no differences in treatment-related adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, mini-dose MTX combined with corticosteroids can significantly improve the ORR in patients with aGVHD and is well tolerated, although it did not achieve the prespecified 20% improvement with the addition of MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04960644).

Olokizumab plus methotrexate: safety and efficacy over 106 weeks of treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term safety and tolerability of olokizumab (OKZ) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using pooled data from three randomised clinical trials (RCT) followed by open-label extension (OLE) study. METHODS: Cumulative data from three phase 3 core trials and their OLE were analysed. Safety variables assessed included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs of special interest and laboratory results. Efficacy assessments included ACR20/50/70 responses, Disease Activity Score 28 (C-reactive protein) <3.2, CDAI remission and low disease activity (LDA), SDAI remission and LDA, HAQ-DI decrease of 0.22 unit and Boolean 2.0 remission. RESULTS: A total of 2304 patients received OKZ in combination with MTX either once every 2 weeks or once every 4 weeks. Event rates per 100 patient-years in OKZ every 2 weeks and OKZ every 4 weeks, respectively, were 9.57 and 9.13 for SAEs; 2.95 and 2.34 for serious infections; 0.09 and 0.05 for gastrointestinal perforations; 0.58 and 0.83 for major adverse cardiovascular events; and 0.45 and 0.50 for malignancies. No increase in the rate of any AE was observed over 106 weeks of treatment. The evaluation of laboratory variables demonstrated the expected changes, like neutropenia, elevation of liver enzymes and blood lipids. Clinical response rates remained stable during the OLE. CONCLUSION: The long-term safety and tolerability of OKZ in combination with MTX remained stable. The efficacy of OKZ was maintained through week 106. These findings support OKZ as a treatment option for patients with active RA.

Efficacy of baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis up to 6.5 years of treatment: results of a long-term study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of once-daily baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had inadequate response (IR) to MTX, csDMARDs or bDMARDs. METHODS: Data from three completed phase III studies-RA-BEAM (MTX-IR), RA-BUILD (csDMARD-IR) and RA-BEACON (bDMARD-IR)-and one completed long-term extension study (RA-BEYOND) were analysed up to 6.5 years [340 weeks (RA-BEAM) and 336 weeks (RA-BUILD and RA-BEACON)]. Low disease activity (LDA) [Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤11], clinical remission (SDAI ≤3.3) and physical function [Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤0.5] were the main outcomes assessed. Completer and non-responder imputation (NRI) analyses were conducted on each population. RESULTS: At week 340 or 336, LDA was achieved in 37%/83% of MTX-IR, 35%/83% of csDMARD-IR and 23%/73% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. Remission was achieved in 20%/40% of MTX-IR, 13%/32% of csDMARD-IR and 9%/30% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. HAQ-DI ≤0.5 was reached in 31%/51% of MTX-IR, 25%/46% of csDMARD-IR and 24%/38% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment with baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg demonstrated efficacy up to 6.5 years with maintained LDA/remission results across SDAI, CDAI and DAS28-hsCRP consistent with previously reported data, and was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: United States National Library of Medicine clinical trials database www.clinicaltrials.gov; RA-BEYOND; NCT01885078.

Single-route CNS prophylaxis for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas: real-world outcomes from 21 US academic institutions.

Prophylaxis is commonly used to prevent central nervous sy stem (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with no clear standard of care. We retrospectively evaluated 1162 adult patients across 21 US academic centers with DLBCL or similar histologies who received single-route CNS prophylaxis as part of frontline therapy between 2013 and 2019. Prophylaxis was administered intrathecally(IT) in 894 (77%) and using systemic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in 236 (20%); 32 patients (3%) switched route due to toxicity and were assessed separately. By CNS-International Prognostic Index (IPI), 18% were considered low-risk, 51% moderate, and 30% high. Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) was confirmed in 243 of 866 evaluable patients (21%). Sixty-four patients (5.7%) had CNS relapse after median 7.1 months from diagnosis, including 15 of 64 (23%) within the first 6 months. There was no significant difference in CNS relapse between IT and HD-MTX recipients (5.4% vs 6.8%, P = .4), including after propensity score matching to account for differences between respective recipient groups. Weighting by CNS-IPI, expected vs observed CNS relapse rates were nearly identical (5.8% vs 5.7%). Testicular involvement was associated with high risk of CNS relapse (11.3%) despite most having lower CNS-IPI scores. DHL did not significantly predict for CNS relapse after single-route prophylaxis, including with adjustment for treatment regimen and other factors. This large study of CNS prophylaxis recipients with DLBCL found no significant difference in CNS relapse rates between routes of administration. Relapse rates among high-risk subgroups remain elevated, and reconsideration of prophylaxis strategies in DLBCL is of critical need.

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine A versus methotrexate and cyclosporine A for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients.

BACKGROUND: Different prophylactic protocols are available for preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after matched sibling donor (MSD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide plus cyclosporine A (PT-CY/CSA) versus methotrexate plus CSA (MTX/CSA) as GVHD prophylaxis protocols in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from fully matched donors. METHODS: The 1-year outcomes of 89 patients treated with PT-CY/CSA and 90 patients treated with MTX/CSA who had MSD allo-HCT for AML using unmanipulated mobilized PBSC were examined and compared. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 100 days was considerably lower in the PT-CY/CSA group (4% vs 19.3%, p = 0.002), however there were no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1-year (19.6% vs 37.4%, p = 0.053). Significant delays in neutrophil and platelet engraftments were reported in the PT-CY/CSA group (17 vs 12 days) and (13 vs 12 days), respectively (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidences of relapse (19.1% vs 13.7%, p = 0.470), overall survival (79.1% vs 77.3%, p = 0.986), non-relapse mortality (16.5% vs 16.8%, p = 0.837), and the GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) (53.7% vs 46.6%, p = 0.478) did not differ statistically at 1-year. CONCLUSION: PT-CY/CSA demonstrated a significant decrease in the rate of acute GVHD. However, it was associated with engraftment delay.

Efficacy of intravenous high-dose methotrexate in preventing relapse to the central nervous system in R-CHOP(-like)-treated, high-risk, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients and its effect on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) carries a dismal prognosis and most clinical guidelines recommend CNS prophylaxis to patients deemed at high risk of CNS relapse. However, results from observational studies investigating the effect of CNS prophylaxis have yielded conflicting results. The aims of this study were to evaluate: (i) whether addition of prophylactic intravenous high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) reduces the risk of CNS relapse in high-risk DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP or similar, and (ii) whether HD-MTX prophylaxis confers an overall survival benefit, irrespective of CNS relapse. We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE for data on DLBCL patients at high risk of CNS relapse treated with R-CHOP or similar who received HD-MTX as an intervention and a comparator arm of patients who did not receive prophylaxis and/or intrathecal prophylaxis. A risk of bias was estimated using the ROBINS-I tool and the quality of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. Finally, a meta- analysis based on the systematic review was conducted. A total of 1,812 studies were screened. No randomized controlled trials were identified. Seven observational studies comprising 1,661 patients met the inclusion criteria. We found a statistically non-significant relative risk of 0.54 (95% confidence interval: 0.27-1.07) of CNS relapse for patients receiving HD-MTX versus controls. The meta-analysis investigating mortality demonstrated a relative risk of death of 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.44-1.11) for patients treated with HD-MTX versus controls. The overall risk of bias was adjudged as "serious" and the quality of the evidence was rated as "low". In conclusion, our data indicate that HD-MTX does not prevent or, at best, only slightly reduces the risk of CNS relapse and confers no survival benefit.

Characterizing second line and beyond therapies for primary central nervous system lymphomas.

Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive lymphoma that affects the CNS without other systemic involvement. High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-based regimens are recommended frontline treatment, followed by consolidation with either high-dose chemotherapy, whole brain radiation (WBRT) +/- sequential temozolomide (TMZ), or autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT). Despite advancements with HDMTX and rituximab, up to half of patients will relapse. Treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease varies widely as preferred regimens are not well-established. Our study aimed to provide real-world characterization of R/R PCNSL therapies. The secondary objective was characterization of consolidation methods after frontline treatment. This retrospective, descriptive analysis included 54 adult PCNSL patients that received a HDMTX-based frontline regimen between 4/1/2016 and 7/1/2022. Patients receiving HDMTX for the purpose of secondary CNS lymphoma, non-B cell origin PCNSL, and intraocular lymphoma were excluded. Thirty-one patients (57%) received consolidation therapy with rituximab and high-dose cytarabine (R-HDAC), WBRT, or both. Thirteen patients (24%) proceeded with autoSCT. Twenty-five patients had disease progression, with 17 patients receiving second line treatment. The second line treatments were WBRT (24%), clinical trial (18%), rituximab with lenalidomide (R2; 18%), re-induction with HDMTX-based regimens (18%), ibrutinib with rituximab (12%) and R-HDAC (12%). Seven patients progressed, and all received third line treatment. Treatments varied, including R2; ibrutinib +/- HDMTX; rituximab, methotrexate, and cytarabine; R-HDAC; R-nivolumab; and WBRT. Five patients received a fourth line regimen of R +/- lenalidomide, R-HDMTX, or nivolumab monotherapy. Regimens used for the three patients who received fifth line treatment and beyond included R-TMZ and pembrolizumab monotherapy in addition to previously described regimens. Regimen selection is varied and highly dependent on physician preference and patient factors, including clinical trial eligibility, prior therapies, performance status, organ function, and treatment intent. Prospective clinical trials are needed to guide optimal management.

Cumulative methotrexate dose is not associated with liver fibrosis in patients with a history of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: There are established risk factors for liver fibrosis (LF), but data on the impact of methotrexate on LF in patients with psoriasis are lacking. OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the prevalence of LF in patients with psoriasis and to evaluate the relationship between LF, cumulative methotrexate dose and other LF risk factors. METHODS: Adults with a history of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis were recruited between June 2020 and March 2021. Patients underwent transient elastography to evaluate LF. Three values for liver stiffness measurement (LSM) were assessed, indicating mild or worse LF (≥ 7 kPa), moderate or worse LF (≥ 7.9 kPa) and advanced LF (≥ 9.5kPa). Cumulative methotrexate dose and other potential risk factors for LF were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 240 patients were recruited and 204 participants with valid LSM values were included in the analysis [median age 48 years [interquartile range (IQR) 37-57]; 51% female sex; 56% body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 (kg m-2) and a median Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score of 4 (IQR 1-7, 23% score ≥ 8)]. In total, 91% had received methotrexate [median duration 36 months (IQR 14-78)]. Prevalence of LF was 36%, 25% and 17% using LSM ≥ 7 kPa, ≥ 7.9 kPa and ≥ 9.5 kPa, respectively. There was no association between cumulative methotrexate dose [median 2.16 (IQR 0.93-5.2)] and continuous LSM values [unstandardized coefficient 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.49 to 0.82, P = 0.626] or using the categorical LSM cutoff values: ≥ 7 kPa [unadjusted odds ratio 1.06 (95% CI 0.97-1.15), P = 0.192], ≥ 7.9 kPa [unadjusted odds ratio 1.03 (95% CI 0.94-1.12), P = 0.577] and ≥ 9.5 kPa (unadjusted odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.91-1.12; P = 0.843). The following risk factors were associated with higher LSM values: BMI (P ≤ 0.001), waist circumference (P ≤ 0.001), metabolic syndrome (P ≤ 0.001), AUDIT score (P = 0.020) and FIB-4 score (P = 0.03). BMI ≥ 28, diabetes and metabolic syndrome were shown to be better predictors of LF compared with FIB-4 score. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms a high prevalence of significant LF in patients with psoriasis. Cumulative methotrexate dose was not associated with LF. Patients with BMI ≥ 28, metabolic syndrome and diabetes are at higher risk for LF. These risk factors may help to identify when a more detailed liver health assessment is needed.

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin disease affecting 3% of the UK population. People with psoriasis appear to have higher rates of liver fibrosis (scarring in the liver from injury or inflammation) compared with people without psoriasis. There are several risk factors for increasing chances of developing liver fibrosis, including obesity, alcohol and diabetes; however, there have been some concerns that methotrexate (a medicine used to treat psoriasis) could also contribute to liver fibrosis. The majority of people needing systemic therapy (such as oral medicines) will try methotrexate first as per National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. In this study carried out in the UK, we aimed to look at the relationship between the cumulative dose (total over time) of methotrexate and liver fibrosis and the relationship between other risk factors and liver fibrosis (e.g. body mass index (BMI) (a measure that uses your height and weight to work out whether your weight is healthy), diabetes, alcohol intake and metabolic syndrome (a combination of diabetes, high blood pressure and obesity)). Liver fibrosis was measured using transient elastography, which is a non-invasive technique similar to an ultrasound. We also aimed to find out whether the clinical risk factors for liver fibrosis and a simple test called a 'FIB-4 score' (measured using blood test values and age) can predict a person's chance of developing liver fibrosis, in order to determine which people will benefit most from transient elastography. From our results, we were able to confirm that liver scarring is prevalent in our patients with psoriasis. We did not find an association between cumulative methotrexate and liver scarring. However, BMI, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and FIB-4 score were associated with liver scarring. We found that BMI ≥ 28, metabolic syndrome and diabetes can be used to identify patients who require a liver health assessment. Overall, the study findings suggest that cumulative methotrexate dose is not associated with liver fibrosis in people with a history of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Hysterectomy versus chemotherapy for low-risk non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN): A cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the cost-effectiveness for hysterectomy versus standard of care single agent chemotherapy for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted comparing single agent chemotherapy with hysterectomy using decision analysis and Markov modeling from a healthcare payer perspective in Canada. The base case was a 40-year-old patient with low-risk non-metastatic GTN that completed childbearing. Outcomes were life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and adjusted 2022 costs (CAD). Discounting was 1.5% annually and the time horizon was the patient's lifetime. Model validation included face validity, deterministic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analysis. RESULTS: Mean costs for chemotherapy and hysterectomy arms were $34,507 and $17,363, respectively, while effectiveness measure were 30.37 QALYs and 31.04 LYs versus 30.14 QALYs and 30.82 Lys, respectively. The ICER was $74,526 (USD $54,516) per QALY. Thresholds favoring hysterectomy effectiveness were 30-day hysterectomy mortality below 0.2% and recurrence risk during surveillance above 9.2% (low-risk) and 33.4% (high-risk). Scenario analyses for Dactinomycin and Methotrexate led to similar results. Sensitivity analysis using tornado analysis found the cost to be most influenced by single agent chemotherapy cost and risk of resistance, number of weeks of chemotherapy, and probability of postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION: Compared to hysterectomy, single agent chemotherapy as a first-line treatment costs $74,526 for each additional QALY gained. Given that this cost falls below the accepted $100,000 willingness-to-pay threshold and waitlist limitations within public healthcare systems, these results support the continued use of chemotherapy as standard of care approach for low-risk GTN.

The optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles in clinically lymph node-positive bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles needed to achieve a pathological response in patients with clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa) who received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 388 patients who received three or four cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine or (dose-dense) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), followed by consolidative RC for cTanyN1-3M0 BCa. We compared pathological complete (pCR = ypT0N0) and objective response (pOR = yp ≤T1N0) between treatment groups. Predictors of pCR and/or pOR were assessed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The secondary endpoints were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). We evaluated the association between the number of induction chemotherapy cycles administered and survival outcomes on multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Overall, 101 and 287 patients received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy, respectively. Of these, 72 (19%) and 128 (33%) achieved pCR and pOR response, respectively. The pCR (20%, 18%) and pOR (40%, 31%) rates did not differ significantly between patients receiving three or four cycles (P > 0.05). The number of cycles was not associated with pCR or pOR on multivariable logistic regression analyses. The 2-year OS estimates were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74) and 63% (95% CI 0.58-0.7) for patients receiving three or four cycles, respectively. Receiving three vs four cycles was not associated with OS and CSS on uni- or multivariable Cox regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Pathological response and survival outcomes did not differ between administering three or four induction chemotherapy cycles in patients with cN+ BCa. A fewer cycles (minimum three) may be oncologically sufficient in patients with cN+ BCa, while decreasing the wait for definitive local therapy in those patients who end up without a response to chemotherapy. This warrants further validation.

Biomimetic NO Scavenging Hyaluronic Acid Nanoparticles Enable Targeted Delivery of MTX and Integrated Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complicated chronic disorder of the immune system, featured with severe inflammatory joints, synovium hyperplasia, articular cartilage, and bone damage. In the RA microenvironment, RA-involved cells, overproduced nitric oxide (NO), and pro-inflammatory cytokines are highly interplayed and mutually reinforced, which form a vicious circle and play crucial roles in the formation and progression of RA. To comprehensively break the vicious circle and obtain the maximum benefits, we have developed neutrophil membrane-camouflaged NO scavenging nanoparticles based on an NO-responsive hyaluronic acid derivative for delivery of MTX. These multifunctional nanoparticles (NNO-NPs/MTX), by inheriting the membrane functions of the source cells, possess prolonged circulation and specific localization at the inflamed sites when administrated in the body. Remarkably, NNO-NPs/MTX can neutralize the pro-inflammatory cytokines via the outer membrane receptors, scavenge NO, and be responsively disassociated to release MTX for RA-involved cell regulation and HA for lubrication in the RA sites. In a collagen-induced arthritis mouse model, NNO-NPs/MTX exhibits a significant anti-inflammation effect and effectively alleviates the characteristic RA symptoms such as synovial hyperplasia and cartilage destruction, realizing the synergistic and boosted therapeutic outcome against intractable RA. Thus, NNO-NPs/MTX provides a promising and potent platform to integrately treat RA.

The incidence and prognosis of other iatrogenic immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders of the lung related to methotrexate: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Other iatrogenic immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (OIIA-LPD) are rare but well-known diseases that manifest during or after methotrexate (MTX) administration. Limited information is available on the clinical characteristics of OIIA-LPD of the lung because only a few cases have been reported. Thus, we aimed to assess the incidence and prognosis of patients with OIIA-LPD of the lung. METHODS: Patients with OIIA-LPD of the lung treated at our institution between January 2008 and July 2020 were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Among the 51 patients with OIIA-LPD, 16 (31.3%, 7 men, 9 women) had OIIA-LPD of the lung (median age, 69 [range, 63-82] years). Peripheral lesions were observed in 10 (62.5%), central lesions in two (12.5%), and both lesions in four (25.0%) patients. Nine of the 16 patients underwent bronchoscopic biopsy, seven were diagnosed (diagnostic yield, 77.8%) and, re-biopsy was performed in 2 patients. Eight (50.0%) patients had LPD and six (37.5%) had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In the 14 patients with confirmed treatment efficacy, the overall response rate to MTX withdrawal was 71.4%. However, chemotherapy was required in case of larger lesions (three patients). Death related to OIIA-LPD occurred in only one patient, and 11 of the 14 patients were alive during the study period (median follow-up time, 53.7 [range, 4.3-84.2] months). CONCLUSION: The incidence of OIIA-LPD of the lung is 31.3% and higher than that reported previously. The treatment effect of MTX withdrawal seems to be sufficient; however, in some cases, chemotherapy may be required from the beginning.