EUFOREA/EPOS2020 statement on the clinical considerations for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps care.

Following the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), patients suffering from severe uncontrolled CRSwNP are recommended to receive oral corticosteroids, (revision) sinus surgery, systemic biologicals and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD). Given the major differences in indications, outcomes, practical considerations, risks and costs of these key pillars of treatment, there is a growing need to define criteria for each treatment option and list the clinically relevant and major considerations for them. This EUFOREA document therefore provides an expert panel overview of the expected outcomes, specific considerations and (contra)indications of the five major treatment arms of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: oral corticosteroids, primary and revision sinus surgery, biological treatment and ATAD. This overview of treatment considerations is needed to allow physicians and patients to consider the different options in the context of providing optimal and personalized care for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. In conclusion, the five major treatment options for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP have intrinsic advantages, specific indications and considerations that are of importance to the patient, the physician and the society. This EUFOREA statement supports the unmet need to define criteria for the indication of every treatment pillar of CRSwNP.

Factors for predicting the outcome of surgery for non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

BACKGROUND: Despite the large patient base in Asia, the prognostic factors of patients with non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs) remain largely undetermined. OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the predictive value of clinical and biological variables for non-eosinophilic CRSwNP. METHODS: A total of 51 patients with non-eosinophilic CRSwNP who underwent functional endoscopic surgery were recruited. Clinical information and assessment were comprehensively collected before and after surgery. A broad spectrum of biomarkers was measured in tissue homogenates using multiple assays. A random forest algorithm and stepwise logistic regression were used to construct clinical, biological, and combined models. RESULTS: A total of 41.2% patients with non-eosinophilic CRSwNP were uncontrolled more than 6 months after surgery. We identified 1 clinical variable (22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score) and 4 biomarkers (programmed cell death ligand 1, platelet-derived growth factor subunit ß [PDGF-ß], macrophage inflammatory protein-3b, and PDGF-α) that were significantly predictive of the surgical outcome. The clinical, biological, and combined models had predictive ability with areas under the curve of 0.78, 0.83, and 0.89, respectively. PDGF-ß and programmed cell death ligand 1 were identified as independent biomarkers for the prognosis of patients with CRSwNP without considerable eosinophilic infiltration. CONCLUSION: This study reveals that clinical and biological factors, such as the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score and PDGF-ß, are predictive of the postfunctional endoscopic surgical prognosis of patients with non-eosinophilic CRSwNP.

Remission in Type 2 Inflammatory Diseases: Current Evidence, Unmet Needs, and Suggestions for Defining Remission in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The development of biological therapies for type 2 inflammatory diseases raises the possibility of addressing remission in those dis-immune conditions. No consensus exists for a definition of remission in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This review aims to critically evaluate the published data to provide the basis for defining remission in CRSwNP. RECENT FINDINGS: The published evidence has yet to provide an unequivocal definition on remission in type 2 inflammatory diseases, in part reflecting differences in approaches to diagnosis and follow-up. A multidimensional evaluation is necessary when considering complete remission, including clinical, inflammatory, and histologic criteria, but how to combine or tailor the three perspectives according to disease severity at baseline or timing of assessment of treatment category is yet to reach consensus. We suggest defining remission starting from the approach taken in asthma and eosinophilic esophagitis, that is, including the resolution of symptoms and improvements in objective parameters of disease severity and/or inflammatory activity. Future studies and consensuses should provide validated criteria with cutoffs for the day-to-day definition of remission. The definition of remission in CRSwNP should include the following criteria, to be verified and maintained for a period of ≥ 12 months: absence of symptoms (nasal obstruction, loss of smell, rhinorrhea as the main ones); no impact of symptoms on quality of life; no need of surgery; no chronic or rescue medications (systemic corticosteroids or antibiotics); and recovery of smell function, possibly evaluated by objective test. Assessment of underlying inflammation should also be considered once accurate and feasible biomarkers are available in clinical practice.

Predictive significance of the blood eosinophilia for chronic sinusitis with nasal polyp recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a complex inflammatory condition characterized by recurring nasal polyps, often necessitating repeated interventions. Blood eosinophilia has emerged as a potential biomarker for predicting disease recurrence. The present study aims to assess the predictive significance of blood eosinophilia for the recurrence of nasal polyps. To accomplish this objective, we employed the appropriate search keywords to explore international databases such as Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Through this process, we extracted scholarly articles that assessed the prognostic value of blood eosinophilia in the recurrence of nasal polyps. The statistical software STATA (version 15) was employed, along with random and fixed-effects models, to appraise the compiled data. Nine articles met inclusion criteria, with a total sample size of 1279 individuals (569 recurrent polyp individuals and 710 non-recurrent polyp individuals). Cumulative Odds ratio analysis revealed that CRSwNP is associated with high blood eosinophile percentage compared to the non-CRSwNP group (p=0.01, OR=1.26, 95%Cl (1.15,1.36). The cut-off value of blood eosinophil percentage (>0.78) had relatively good, and statistically significant predictive potential. No significant publication bias was observed for the included studies. Our findings indicate that the utilization of blood eosinophils holds significant predictive value and can serve as a valuable tool for detecting recurrence in patients with CRSwNP. Based on the outcomes of our comprehensive analysis, we propose a threshold of >0.78 as a reliable indicator for assessing the probability of recurrence in CRSwNP patients.

Breathing pattern disorder in chronic rhinosinusitis with severe asthma: nasal obstruction and polyps do not increase prevalence.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with severe asthma are associated with breathing pattern disorder (BPD). Mouth breathing is a sign of breathing pattern disorder, and nose breathing a fundamental part of breathing pattern retraining for BPD. The prevalence of BPD in relation to CRS subtypes and the relationship of nasal obstruction to BPD in CRS and associated severe asthma is unknown. The breathing pattern assessment tool (BPAT) can identify BPD. Our objective was to thus investigate the prevalence of BPD, nasal airflow obstruction and measures of airway disease severity in CRS with (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) in severe asthma. METHODS: We determined whether CRS status, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) or polyp disease increased BPD prevalence. Demographic factors, measures of airway function and breathlessness in relation to BPD status and CRS subtypes were also evaluated. RESULTS: 130 Patients were evaluated (n = 69 had BPD). The prevalence of BPD in CRS with severe asthma was 53.1%. There was no difference between BPD occurrence between CRSwNP and CRSsNP. The mean polyp grade and PNIF were not statistically different between the BPD and non-BPD group. The presence of nasal polyps did not increase breathlessness. CONCLUSIONS: BPD and CRS are commonly co-associated. CRS status and nasal obstruction per se does not increase BPD prevalence.

Management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Spain: learnings from a nationwide survey of otorhinolaryngologists.

PURPOSE: To describe the self-reported practices on the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialists in Spain to identify potential areas for management optimization. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey with 16 questions was carried out. Recruitment was performed by emailing registered ENT specialists in the Spanish Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC). RESULTS: In total, 127 ENT specialists completed the survey. Fifty-one percent of respondents combined clinical criteria and objective evidence of mucosal inflammation to diagnose CRSwNP. Patient interview and, to a lower degree, a visual analogue scale were the most employed diagnostic tools to quantify symptom severity. Less than half (45%) routinely used the 22-item sino-nasal outcomes test (SNOT-22) to assess the impact of CRSwNP disease in quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcomes and other clinical evaluation tools showed a larger uptake among ENT specialists that worked at an ENT department with an available rhinology unit. Almost all the specialists surveyed (95%) recommended biological treatment, particularly in patients with uncontrolled CRSwNP with respiratory comorbidities (76%), as well as in candidates for revision surgery (66%). CONCLUSION: Spanish otorhinolaryngologists showed a trend toward incorporating CRSwNP guideline recommendations in their clinical practice. The observed low uptake of patient-reported outcomes and objective clinical evaluation tools in routine clinical practise have been identified as areas for optimizing the management of patients with CRSwNP.

Sinonasal seromucinous hamartoma: a single institution case series combined with a narrative review of the literature.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the clinical and histopathological characteristics of sinonasal seromucinous hamartomas (SHs). METHODS: Eight patients with sinonasal SH and treated at a tertiary hospital between November 2005 and September 2023 were included. Additionally, a systematic review of published articles was conducted, analyzing 48 cases of SH described in the literature. RESULTS: Among the eight patients treated at our institution, tumors originated from the posterior nasal cavity in four patients and middle turbinate and middle meatus were the primary origin in two patients each. Coexistence of inflammatory nasal polyps (NPs) was observed in four cases. Histopathologically, four patients exhibited focal respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH) features, and low-grade dysplasia was found in one patient. A combined analysis with previous literature revealed that 46.3% of all cases originated in the anterior nasal cavity. The proportions of cases accompanied by NPs and those with focal REAH features were 20.5% and 39.1%, respectively. Additionally, the frequencies of cases exhibiting dysplastic features (5.4%) and recurrence (2.1%) were low. Remarkably, tumors originating from the anterior region tended to have a higher frequency of dysplasia than those originating from the posterior region, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.0996). CONCLUSION: Patients with sinonasal SH showed favorable treatment outcomes following surgical resection. Focal REAH features and accompanying NPs were frequently observed. A substantial proportion of cases originate in the anterior nasal cavity, and these tumors may exhibit a high tendency for dysplasia.

Artificial intelligence for automatic detection and segmentation of nasal polyposis: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Accurate diagnosis and quantification of polyps and symptoms are pivotal for planning the therapeutic strategy of Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). This pilot study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis system capable of segmenting nasal polyps from nasal endoscopy videos. METHODS: Recorded nasal videoendoscopies from 52 patients diagnosed with CRSwNP between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Images extracted were manually segmented on the web application Roboflow. A dataset of 342 images was generated and divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%) sets. The Ultralytics YOLOv8.0.28 model was employed for automated segmentation. RESULTS: The YOLOv8s-seg model consisted of 195 layers and required 42.4 GFLOPs for operation. When tested against the validation set, the algorithm achieved a precision of 0.91, recall of 0.839, and mean average precision at 50% IoU (mAP50) of 0.949. For the segmentation task, similar metrics were observed, including a mAP ranging from 0.675 to 0.679 for IoUs between 50% and 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that a carefully trained AI algorithm can effectively identify and delineate nasal polyps in patients with CRSwNP. Despite certain limitations like the focus on CRSwNP-specific samples, the algorithm presents a promising complementary tool to existing diagnostic methods.

Common Characteristics of Sinonasal Inflammation Associated with IgG4-Related Disease and Other Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A Retrospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by elevated serum IgG4, tissue infiltration of IgG4-positive cells, and fibrosis. Although a number of IgG4-RD patients show sinonasal involvement, there is little known about sinonasal inflammation associated with IgG4-RD. This study aimed to describe the clinicopathological features of sinonasal inflammation associated with IgG4-RD and to compare with other inflammatory diseases, such as eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of clinicopathological features of patients with sinonasal lesions and high serum IgG4 was performed. Patient data were reviewed to determine whether they fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for other inflammatory diseases. RESULTS: Six of 7 patients were diagnosed with IgG4-RD, while 1 patient was diagnosed with GPA. In the 6 patients with IgG4-RD, intranasal findings showed nasal polyps in 3 patients (50%) and nasal crusting in the 3 patients (50%). Computed tomography showed ethmoid sinus involvement in 5 patients (83%). Five of the 6 patients (83%) were diagnosed with IgG4-RD based on nasal biopsy, whereas 1 patient (17%) was diagnosed based on lacrimal gland biopsy. Four patients fulfilled the Japanese epidemiological survey of refractory ECRS (JESREC) criteria. However, none of the patients showed eosinophil infiltration. Although the patient with GPA showed high levels of serum IgG4 and tissue infiltration of IgG4-positive cells in the nasal biopsy, the patient showed common clinical features of GPA. CONCLUSION: Patients with sinonasal inflammation associated with IgG4-RD had similar clinical characteristics with ECRS and GPA. Histopathological findings of the nasal biopsy from clinically diagnosed GPA was consistent with that of IgG4-RD. Sinonasal inflammation associated with IgG4-RD should be diagnosed based not only on tissue infiltration of IgG4-positive cells but in conjunction with clinical findings such as local nasal characteristics, involvement of other organs, and serum antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody levels. IgG4-RD should be ruled out in patients with eosinophilia without histopathological eosinophil infiltration.

Outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

BACKGROUND: With the recent proliferation of novel therapeutics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), there is an immediate need for comprehensive means to assess CRSwNP disease status as well as to determine treatment efficacy. Outcome measures exist in different forms. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) allow patients to provide direct input about their condition that is not possible to obtain in any other way. Common constructs that are measured using PROMs include quality of life or the burden of disease manifestations (e.g., symptom severity). Outcomes may also include the results of objective diagnostic testing/measurement of clinical signs or measured using psychophysical tests. Biomarkers represent an emerging class of outcome measures for CRSwNP and are chosen to directly reflect the active pathophysiologic processes of CRSwNP in the peripheral blood, sinus/polyp tissues, and sinonasal mucus. METHODS: Narrative review of the literature, identifying and describing outcome measures that may be used in the evaluation of CRSwNP and for assessment of treatment responses. RESULTS: In this review, we identify many different outcome measures for CRSwNP that fall under the categories of PROM, objective test, psychophysical test or biomarker. We describe the history of each - including seminal studies - and demonstrate the formal validation, psychometric performance, and limitations of each. CONCLUSIONS: PROMs, objective tests, psychophysical tests and biomarkers represent different classes of outcome measures that are complementary means of assessing CRSwNP disease status and treatment efficacy. The choice or interpretation of a CRSwNP outcome measure should be undertaken with full knowledge of its formal validation, psychometric performance, and limitations.

An eosinophil peroxidase activity assay accurately predicts eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: A definitive diagnosis of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) requires invasive surgical tissue sampling and histologic enumeration of intact eosinophils. Eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) is an accurate biomarker of sinonasal tissue eosinophilia in CRS regardless of polyp status. A less invasive and rapid method that accurately identifies tissue eosinophilia would be of great benefit to patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate a new clinical tool that uses a nasal swab and colorimetric EPX activity assay to predict a diagnosis of eCRS. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted using nasal swabs and sinonasal tissue biopsies obtained from patients with CRS electing endoscopic sinus surgery. Patients were classified as non-eCRS (n = 19) and eCRS (n = 35) on the basis of pathologically determined eosinophil counts of less than 10 or greater than or equal to 10 eosinophils/HPF, respectively. Swab-deposited EPX activity was measured and compared with tissue eosinophil counts, EPX levels, and CRS-specific disease metrics. RESULTS: EPX activity was significantly increased in patients with eCRS than in patients without eCRS (P < .0001). With a relative absorbance unit cutoff value of greater than or equal to 0.80, the assay demonstrated high sensitivity (85.7%) and moderate specificity (79.0%) for confirming eCRS. Spearman correlations between EPX activity and tissue eosinophil counts (rs = 0.424), EPX levels (rs = 0.503), and Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores (rs = 0.440) in eCRS were significant (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation evaluates a nasal swab sampling method and EPX activity assay that accurately confirms eCRS. This method could potentially address the unmet need to identify sinonasal tissue eosinophilia at the point-of-care, as well as to longitudinally monitor eosinophil activity and treatment response.

[Difficult-to-treat chronic rhinosinusitis-when the standard treatment is not effective and biologics are not available]. / Schwierig zu behandelnde chronische Rhinosinusitis ­ wenn die Standardtherapie nicht wirkt und Biologika nicht zur Verfügung stehen.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, significant improvements have been made in the treatment options for uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to standard medical and surgical therapy. This is the result of a better understanding of the pathophysiology and the resulting development of biologicals for CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, biologics are not (yet) available for all patients in Europe. OBJECTIVE: Based on the session "Difficult-to-treat CRS, when biologics are not available" at the 29th Congress of the European Rhinologic Society (ERS) 2023 in Sofia, Bulgaria, the treatment options for uncontrolled CRS with the exclusion of biologics will be discussed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The content of the presentations "Is there a place for antibiotics?" "Indications for revision surgery," "Novel systemic treatment options," "Novel local treatment options," and "Phototherapy for nasal polyps" are outlined and supported by a review of the literature. RESULTS: Various treatment options are available for managing uncontrolled CRS, even if biologic treatments are unavailable. Treatment options for type­2 (T2) CRS include steroid rinses, repeated short-term oral steroids, steroid-eluting stents, and extended sinus surgery. In the case of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization can be considered. Non-T2 endotypes or CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) may benefit from several weeks of macrolides and xylitol rinses. CONCLUSION: To accurately assess the efficacy of second-line therapies for treatment of difficult-to-treat CRS within an endotype-specific framework, additional controlled clinical trials are needed that take into account the heterogeneity of CRS endotypes.

[Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis : A retrospective analysis of therapeutic approaches in 463 patients]. / Chronische Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi : Retrospektive Analyse des therapeutischen Vorgehens bei 463 Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease, the treatment of which has undergone significant changes in recent years. In addition to surgical approaches, topical and systemic steroids, and adaptive acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization, three specific antibodies have complemented the therapeutic portfolio since 2019. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of all patients who presented as outpatients for the first time due to CRSwNP in 2007 and 2008 (collective A) and 2017 and 2018 (collective B) was performed, up to and including June 2023. RESULTS: The clinical courses of 463 patients (mean age 49.1 years, range 5-82 years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. Conservative treatment with nasal corticosteroids started before initial presentation was more frequent in collective B (collective A 43.9% vs. collective B 72.2%). In 278 of the 463 patients (60%; A: 62%, B: 58%), at least one operation on the nasal sinuses had been performed after initial presentation; in 101 of these patients (36.3%) recurrent polyposis (within mean follow-up of 2.4 years) required further treatment. The indication for ASA provocation/desensitization was applied less frequently in collective B, also due to a high discontinuation rate (at least 38%) of the maintenance therapy. Of the total cohort, 16 patients (3.5%; A: n = 8, B: n = 8) were meanwhile switched to antibody therapy at recurrence. CONCLUSION: A step-by-step guideline-orientated approach is recommended in the treatment of CRSwNP. Systemic antibodies as an add-on to nasal corticosteroids are a relatively new therapeutic option for treatment-refractory CRSwNP, which reduces the indication for ASA desensitization, which is associated with a relatively high incidence of side effects and poor compliance.

Identification of Inflammatory Endotypes by Clinical Characteristics and Nasal Secretion Biomarkers in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.

INTRODUCTION: The emergency of biologics and surgical techniques targeting the specific inflammatory endotype in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) asks for efficient identification of patients with different endotypes. Although mucosal IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IgE have been used to define type 2 (T2) inflammation, the optimal one remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal anchor for T2 inflammation and identify clinical characteristics and nasal secretion biomarkers predicting different endotypes in CRSwNP. METHODS: Six mediators in sinonasal tissue and 36 mediators in nasal secretion samples were detected by the Bio-Plex suspension array system. Mucosal IFN-γ and IL-17A levels were used to define the T1 and T3 endotype, respectively. The efficacy of mucosal IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IgE to define the T2 endotype was compared. The power of clinical characteristics and nasal secretion biomarkers to predict the T1, T2, and T3 endotype was analyzed. RESULTS: Among mucosal IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IgE, IL-13 was the best one to coincide with the expression of other T2 biomarkers. A combination of atopy, facial pain symptom score, ethmoid/maxillary computed tomography score ratio, and blood eosinophil percentage had a moderate predictive performance for T2 endotype (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC] = 0.815), comparable to that of nasal secretion IL-5 (AUC = 0.819). For the T3 endotype, nasal secretion IL-1Rα identified it with an AUC value of 0.756. No efficient marker for the T1 endotype was found. CONCLUSION: IL-13 is a primary anchor for the T2 endotype in CRSwNP. Clinical characteristics and nasal secretion biomarkers are helpful for identifying the T2 and T3 endotype of CRSwNP.

Update on allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a unique clinical entity that falls under the broader umbrella of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps with type 2 inflammation. It is characterized by nasal polyposis, production of characteristic thick eosinophilic mucin, and expansile change of involved sinus cavities. The diagnosis is classically made using the Bent and Kuhn criteria. However, recent studies have indicated the lack of specificity of some major criteria. The need to fulfill all 5 criteria before diagnosing AFRS partially mitigates this but renders the criteria cumbersome to use, and highlights the need to develop more specific criteria. Our understanding of AFRS pathophysiology has advanced significantly and has helped elucidate the lack of histatins contributing to the inability to clear fungal spores, consequently leading to fungi-induced disruption of the epithelial barrier and stimulation of sinonasal epithelial cells. These trigger a cascade of type 2 inflammatory cytokines driven by both the adaptive and innate immune system. Although more research is needed, these findings could hypothetically point to a limited type 3 immune response at the sinus mucosa, resulting in a compensatory overstimulation of type 2 inflammatory processes. Treatment for AFRS remains centered on surgery and topical corticosteroids. Short courses of systemic corticosteroids may be used with caution, and fungal-specific immunotherapy and systemic antifungals are options in recalcitrant disease. Biologics show early promise, as we await data from randomized controlled trials under way. Finally, new insights into AFRS pathology provide opportunities for novel therapeutic strategies.

Management of Mechanical Nasal Obstruction Isolated or Associated to Upper Airway Inflammatory Diseases in Real Life: Use of both Subjective and Objective Criteria.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mechanical nasal obstruction (MNO) is a prevalent condition with a high impact on patient's quality-of-life (QoL) and socio-economic burden. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of both subjective and objective criteria in the appropriate management of MNO, either alone or associated to upper airway inflammatory diseases such as allergic rhinitis (AR) or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). RECENT FINDINGS: A long debate persists about the usefulness of subjective and objective methods for making decisions on the management of patients with nasal obstruction. Establishing standards and ranges of symptom scales and questionnaires is essential to measure the success of an intervention and its impact on QoL. To our knowledge this is the first real-life study to describe the management of MNO using both subjective and objective criteria in MNO isolated or associated to upper airway inflammatory diseases (AR or CRSwNP). Medical treatment (intranasal corticosteroids) has a minor but significant improvement in MNO subjective outcomes (NO, NOSE, and CQ7) with no changes in loss of smell and objective outcomes. After surgery, all MNO patients reported a significant improvement in both subjective and objective outcomes, this improvement being higher in CRSwNP. We concluded that in daily clinical practice, the therapeutic recommendation for MNO should be based on both subjective and objective outcomes, nasal corrective surgery being the treatment of choice in MNO, either isolated or associated to upper airway inflammatory diseases, AR or CRSwNP.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disease of the nose and paranasal sinuses, with a prevalence of approximately 1% to 7%. It is defined by the presence of at least two cardinal symptoms (nasal blockage, obstruction, or congestion; anterior or posterior nasal drainage; facial pain or pressure; and hyposmia) for at least three consecutive months, with objective findings on imaging or nasal endoscopy. CRS can result in significant patient costs and lower quality of life due to severe fatigue, depression, and sometimes reduced cognitive function. The condition is categorized as primary or secondary and with or without nasal polyps. Treatment is directed at reducing symptoms, improving mucus clearance, reducing inflammation, enhancing ciliary function, and removing bacteria and biofilms from the nasal mucosa. First-line treatment comprises nasal saline irrigation and intranasal corticosteroids. Acute exacerbation of CRS is common and is defined as a transient worsening of symptoms. The role of oral antibiotics and oral corticosteroids for acute exacerbations is unclear. Optimal maintenance therapy can help alleviate exacerbations. Patients with refractory CRS that is not responsive to first-line treatment and patients with alarm symptoms should be referred to an otolaryngologist for further evaluation and consideration of surgical management. Identifying patients who have CRS with nasal polyps or comorbid conditions such as atopic dermatitis, asthma, or eosinophilic esophagitis is especially important to ensure they are referred to a specialist for consideration of biologic therapy.

The importance of follow-up examinations in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.

PURPOSE: Clinical examinations following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) are critical for physicians to assess results of the intervention and to early identify recurrences. However, no clear consensus on the frequency and timing of clinical examinations following surgery exists. The aim of this study was to analyze CRSwNP recurrences after FESS with a specific focus on the adherence to follow-up examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent FESS for CRSwNP were enrolled. Clinical parameters were recorded. Adherence to follow-up examinations with nasal fiber optic endoscopy and regular administration of nasal steroids were analyzed. RESULTS: Adherence to periodic clinical examinations and regular treatment with nasal steroids was 25 %. CRSwNP recurrence was observed in 56.7 % of cases at the last follow-up examination. No statistically significant difference concerning nasal symptoms was observed between patients with and without current recurrence (p > 0.05). Subjects who underwent regular examinations and prompt treatment of small recurrences had a lower probability of relapse at their last examination (7.7 % versus 38.2 %, respectively; p < 0.001). Polyp grade > 2 in patients with or without adherence were seen in 15.4 % and 42.9 % of cases, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to follow-up examinations with nasal optic fiber endoscopy is crucial to early identify recurrence after surgery and promptly treat it with medical therapy.

Diagnostic value of myeloperoxidase and eosinophil cationic protein in nasal secretions for endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVES: To explore associations between inflammatory endotypes and clinical presentations in CRS. To investigate the value of secretions myeloperoxidase (MPO) and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) detections in the diagnosis of endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), so as to provide guidance for the clinical application of MPO and ECP detection in secretions. METHODS: We collected clinical symptom scores from patients with CRS and examined the differences between endotypes in clinical features. Patients' nasal secretions and polyps (or middle turbinate for control) were collected and their NEU number, EOS%, MPO and ECP levels were measured. Correlation analysis was performed for these biomarkers in secretions and tissues, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the predictive potential of the biomarkers mentioned above in nasal secretions. RESULTS: Patients with Eos+Neu+ and Eos+Neu-CRS scored highest in most clinical symptom scores, while Eos-Neu+ and Eos-Neu-CRS scored lowest. Correlation analysis showed that tissues NEU number was correlated with NEU number and MPO level in nasal secretions (R = 0.4088; 0.6613); tissues EOS % was correlated with EOS% and ECP level in nasal secretions (R = 0.2344; 0.5774). To diagnose Neu+CRS, the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.8961) was determined for MPO in secretions; the highest AUC (0.7400) was determined for NEU number in secretions. To diagnose Eos+Neu-CRS from Eos-Neu-CRS in Neu-CRS, the highest AUC (0.8801) was determined for ECP in secretions. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical presentations are directly associated with CRS endotypes. Measurement of MPO and ECP in nasal secretions is useful for the endotypes diagnosis of CRS.

Posterior nasal nerve neurectomy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Managing Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis (CRSwNP) is always challenging due to the chronicity of the disease and its intractable course. Posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) can be effective in alleviating symptoms of CRSwNP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary care referral hospital from August 2019 to April 2022. A total of 46 patients of CRSwNP were included (23 patients in the study and 23 in the control group). Patients in the study group underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and PNN and patients in the control group with ESS. The symptoms and quality-of-life improvement were assessed at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the surgery. RESULTS: On intragroup analysis between the preoperative and postoperative scores (SNOT-22, RSDI and LK Score), we found a significant difference for each (p < 0.05). When the improvement of outcome scores was compared between the two groups, a significant difference was obtained for SNOT-22 and RSDI scores at 1 week and 4 weeks (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference found for the duration of surgery/complications between the two groups (p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: The PNN can be an effective add-on procedure in patients with CRSwNP in alleviating short-term control of the symptoms and the quality of life. A larger sample size with long-term follow-up may be required for a better understanding of the efficacy of the PNN in patients with CRSwNP.