The radiological unknown primary of the head and neck: Recommendations for imaging strategies based on a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for the radiological investigation of clinically occult primary cancer in the head and neck. DESIGN AND SETTING: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a search was performed on Medline, Embase and Cochrane library databases to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound guided Fine Needle Aspiration (US FNAC), contrast enhanced CT (CECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT (18F-FDG PET-CT) in the investigation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary (HNSCCUP) presenting with a metastatic cervical lymph node (s). The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Version 2 tool and SIGN 50 guidelines were used to assess the risk of bias and quality of the included studies. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients presenting with metastatic cervical lymph nodes from a HNSCCUP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Utility of different imaging modalities (PET-CT, MRI, CE CT and US FNAC in the management of HNSCCUP). RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria; these were meta-analyses, systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal imaging strategy involves utilisation of various imaging modalities. US FNAC can provide the initial diagnosis and HPV status of the occult primary tumour. CECT and MRI detect up to 44% of occult tumours and guide management. FDG PET-CT is the most sensitive imaging modality for the detection of CUP and should be performed prior to panendoscopy.

The additional role of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in patients with unknown primary lesion with a negative or equivocal [18F]FDG.

PURPOSE: [18F]FDG PET/CT to detect unknown primary lesions is essential for clinical management but still has limitations. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI is a tumor-stromal imaging agent that provides a promising alternative to [18F]FDG for the assessment of malignancies. We aimed to investigate whether [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT has an additional role in identifying unknown primary lesions with negative or equivocal [18F] FDG PET/CT results. METHODS: This single-center prospective clinical study was conducted between March 2020 and March 2022 at Southwest Medical University Hospital. Patients underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT for the identification of unknown primary lesions. They underwent repeat [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT when [18F]FDG PET/CT results were negative or equivocal. Histopathological examination, surgery, or clinical follow-up (at least 3 months) for FAPI-positive lesions. The diagnostic efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI in identifying unknown primary lesions was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 44 participants (median age, 57 ± 12 [SD]; 22 [50%] men) were evaluated. Thirteen of the 44 patients had equivocal [18F]FDG PET/CT findings, while the diagnosis was clear on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT also revealed primary lesions in additional 17 patients with negative [18F]FDG PET/CT findings. In fourteen of 44 patients, no primary lesion was detected by either tracer. On this basis, we analyzed 94 lymph node metastatic lesions. The mean SUVmax of lymph node metastases on [68Ga] Ga-FAPI PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT were 9.2 ± 5.1, 7.9 ± 4.8 (p = 0.03) and the mean TBR were 9.1 ± 5.2, 4.9 ± 3.1 (p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT showed great potential for identifying unknown primary lesions and has the potential to improve the detection rate of unknown primary lesions with negative or equivocal for [18F]FDG findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov. Identifier: ChiCTR2100044131.

Prophylactic mastectomy and occult malignancy: Surgical and imaging considerations.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) is not routinely recommended for patients undergoing prophylactic mastectomy (PM), yet omission remains a subject of debate among surgeons. A modern patient cohort was examined to determine occult malignancy (OM) incidence within PM specimens to reinforce current recommendations. METHODS: All PM performed over a 5-year period were retrospectively identified, including women with unilateral breast cancer who underwent synchronous or delayed contralateral PM or women with elevated cancer risk who underwent bilateral PM. RESULTS: The study population included 772 patients (598 CPM, 174 BPM) with a total of 39 OM identified: 17 invasive cancers (14 CPM, 3 BPM) and 22 DCIS (19 CPM, 3 BPM). Of the 86 patients for whom SLNB was selectively performed, 1 micrometastasis was identified. In the CPM cohort, risk of OM increased with age, presence of LCIS of either breast, or presence of a non-BRCA high-penetrance gene mutation, while preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was associated with lower likelihood of OM. CONCLUSIONS: Given the low incidence of invasive OM in this updated series, routine SLNB is of low value for patients undergoing PM. For patients with indeterminate radiographic findings, discordant preoperative biopsies, LCIS, or non-BRCA high-penetrance gene mutations, selective SLNB implementation could be considered.

Imaging Approach for Cervical Lymph Node Metastases from Unknown Primary Tumor.

Neck swelling due to lymph node (LN) metastasis is one of the initial symptoms of head and neck cancer, and in some cases, the primary tumor is not clinically evident. The purpose of imaging for LN metastasis from an unknown primary site is to identify the primary tumor or detect its absence, which leads to the correct diagnosis and optimal treatment. The authors discuss diagnostic imaging approaches for identifying the primary tumor in cases of unknown primary cervical LN metastases. The distribution and characteristics of LN metastases may help locate the primary site. Unknown primary LN metastasis often occurs at nodal levels II and III, and in recent reports, these were mostly related to human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Another characteristic imaging finding suggestive of metastasis from HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer is a cystic change in LN metastases. Other characteristic imaging findings such as calcification may help predict the histologic type and locate the primary site. In cases of LN metastases at nodal levels IV and VB, a primary lesion located outside the head and neck region must also be considered. One clue for detecting the primary lesion at imaging is the disruption of anatomic structures, which can help in identifying small mucosal lesions or submucosal tumors at each subsite. Additionally, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT may help identify a primary tumor. These imaging approaches for identifying primary tumors enable prompt identification of the primary site and assist clinicians in making the correct diagnosis. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Prediction of extranodal extension in oropharyngeal cancer patients and carcinoma of unknown primary: value of metabolic tumor imaging with hybrid PET compared with MRI and CT.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of metabolic tumor imaging using hybrid PET for the preoperative detection of extranodal extension (ENE) in lymph node metastases of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive cohort of patients with OPSCC treated with primary surgery with or without adjuvant (chemo-) radiotherapy at the Kantonsspital Sankt-Gallen and the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, from 2010 until 2019. Hybrid PET was compared to conventional cross-sectional imaging with MRI and CT. Histopathological presence of ENE of neck dissection specimen served as gold standard. RESULTS: A total number of 234 patients were included in the study, 95 (40.6%) of which had pathological ENE (pENE). CT has a good specificity with 93.7%; meanwhile, MRI was the most sensitive diagnostic method (72.0%). The nodal metabolic tumor parameters (SUVmax, TLG, MTV) were significantly higher in patients with positive ENE (p < 0.001 for all three parameters) than in patients with negative ENE (p < 0.001, for all three parameters). CONCLUSIONS: CT achieved the best specificity, while MRI had the best sensitivity to detect ENE. Nodal metabolic tumor parameters differed significantly between ENE-positive/negative and p16-positive/negative patients. Hence, quantitative data obtained by metabolic imaging might predict presence of ENE and, therefore, could be helpful in customizing therapy management.

Improved cancer detection in Waldeyer's tonsillar ring by 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT imaging.

PURPOSE: In cancer of unknown primary (CUP), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with the glucose analog [18F]FDG represents the standard imaging approach for localization of the malignant primary. Frequently, however, [18F]FDG PET/CT cannot precisely distinguish between small occult tumors and chronic inflammation, especially in Waldeyer's tonsillar ring. To improve the accuracy for detecting primary tumors in the Waldeyer's tonsillar ring, the novel PET tracer [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-4 for specific imaging of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression was used as a more specific target for cancer imaging. METHODS: Eight patients with suspicion of a malignant tumor in Waldeyer's tonsillar ring or a CUP syndrome were examined. PET/CT scans with [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-4 were performed for pre-operative tumor localization. After surgical resection, histopathological and immunohistochemical results were compared to PET/CT findings. RESULTS: Histopathology revealed a palatine or lingual tonsil carcinoma in all patients. In case of lymph node metastases smaller than 7 mm in size, the [18F]FDG PET/CT detection rate of cervical lymph node metastases was higher than that of [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT, while both tracers identified the primary tumors in all eight cases. The size of the primary and the lymph node metastases was directly correlated to the respective FAP expression, as detected by immunohistochemistry. The mean SUVmax for the primary tumors was 21.29 ± 7.97 for 18F-FDG and 16.06 ± 6.29 for 68Ga-FAPI, respectively (p = 0.2). The mean SUVmax for the healthy contralateral tonsils was 8.38 ± 2.45 for [18F]FDG and 3.55 ± 0.47 for [68Ga]FAPI (p < 0.001). The SUVmax ratio of [68Ga]FAPI was significantly different from [18F] FDG (p = 0.03). Mean TBRmax for the [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-4 tracer was markedly higher in comparison to [18F]FDG (10.90 vs. 4.11). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive imaging of FAP expression by [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT resulted in a better visual detection of the malignant primary in CUP, as compared to [18F]FDG imaging. However, the detection rate of lymph node metastases was inferior, presumably due to low FAP expression in small metastases. Nevertheless, by offering a detection method for primary tumors with the potential of lower false positive rates and thus avoiding biopsies, patients with CUP syndrome may benefit from [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT imaging.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Be Able to Identify the Origin of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to discriminate hepatic metastases from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) and hepatic metastases from midgut neuroendocrine tumors (mNET) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: MRI examinations of 24 patients with hepatic metastases from pNET were quantitatively and qualitatively assessed by 2 blinded readers and compared to those obtained in 23 patients with hepatic metastases from mNET. Inter-reader agreement was calculated with kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each variable for the diagnosis of hepatic metastasis from pNET were calculated. Associations between variables and primary tumor (i.e., pNET vs. mNET) were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. A nomogram was developed and validated using an external cohort of 20 patients with pNET and 20 patients with mNET. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was strong to perfect (k = 0.893-1) for qualitative criteria and excellent for quantitative variables (ICC: 0.9817-0.9996). At univariate analysis, homogeneity on T1-weighted images was the most discriminating variable for the diagnosis of pNET (OR: 6.417; p = 0.013) with greatest sensitivity (88%; 21/24; 95% CI: 68-97%). At multivariate analysis, tumor homogeneity on T1-weighted images (p = 0.007; OR: 17.607; 95% CI: 2.179-142.295) and target sign on diffusion-weighted images (p = 0.007; OR: 19.869; 95% CI: 2.305-171.276) were independently associated with pNET. Nomogram yielded a corrected AUC of 0.894 (95% CI: 0.796-0.992) for the diagnosis of pNET in the training cohort and 0.805 (95% CI: 0.662-0.948) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: MRI provides qualitative features that can help discriminate between hepatic metastases from pNET and those from mNET.

The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of patients with lymph node metastasis of unknown primary origin.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and the utility of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in the clinical management of patients presenting with lymph node metastasis of undefined primary origin (CUP). A total of 53 patients (34 males, 19 females) with a diagnosis of lymph node metastasis according to the histopathology and/or conventional imaging were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into four groups according to the initial location of their metastasis - group 1, cervical lymph nodes (n=39), group 2, axillary lymph nodes (n=6), group 3, mediastinal lymph nodes (n=2) and group 4, abdominal and pelvic lymph nodes (n=6). The site of a probable primary malignancy suggested by PET/CT was confirmed by biopsy/further investigations or follow-up. 18F-FDG PET/CT accurately detected the primary carcinoma in 19 of 53 patients (36%), with head and neck cancer and lung carcinoma being the most common primary locations. The PET-CT scan results were negative for primary site localization in 13% of patients (false-negative), while 45% had true negative results, and 6% displayed false-positive results. Additional distant metastatic foci were identified in 21 of all patients (40%). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of the study were identified as 73%, 89%, and 81%, respectively; in the group with cervical lymph node metastasis sensitivity 70% and specificity 84%. To conclude, 18F-FDG PET/CT is a sensitive and selective procedure for detecting unknown primary tumors, especially in the clinical setting of cervical lymph node metastasis and its use should be encouraged earlier in the pre-treatment phase of CUP-patients, leading to higher detection of probable primary sites, guiding subsequent biopsy, and more accurate detection of distant metastases in a single examination.

Carcinoma of unknown primary origin with isolated adrenal metastasis: a report of two cases.

The adrenal glands are one of the most common sites of malignant tumor metastasis. However, metastatic adrenal carcinoma of unknown primary origin with localized adrenal gland involvement is an extremely rare condition. Herein, we reported two cases of carcinoma of unknown primary origin with isolated adrenal metastasis. In the first case, back pain was the trigger; while in the second case, the triggers were low fever and weight loss. Metabolic abnormalities such as hypertension and obesity were not detected in either case. Neither patient had relevant previous medical histories, including malignancy. However, both had a long-term history of smoking. Systemic imaging studies revealed only adrenal tumors and surrounding lesions. Primary adrenocortical carcinoma was initially suspected, and chemotherapy including mitotane was considered. However, due to difficulty in complete resection of the tumor, core needle tumor biopsies were performed. Histopathological examination of biopsy specimens led to the diagnosis of carcinoma of unknown primary origin with isolated adrenal metastasis. In both cases, additional laboratory testing showed high levels of serum squamous cell carcinoma-related antigen and serum cytokeratin fragment. Malignant lesions confined to the adrenal glands are rare. As in our cases, it could be occasionally difficult to differentiate non-functioning primary adrenocortical carcinoma from metastatic adrenal carcinoma of unknown primary origin localized to the adrenal gland. If the lesion is unresectable and there are elevated levels of several tumor markers with no apparent hormonal excess, core needle tumor biopsy should be considered to differentiate the primary tumor from the metastatic tumor.

Sentinel node theory helps tracking of primary lesions of cancers of unknown primary.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node is the first stop of lymphatic spreading of cancer with known primary. The lymph node metastasis pattern of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is unclear and has been presumed to follow the same pathway. To test this hypothesis, data of all 716 patients clinically diagnosed as CUP in our center were collected. METHODS: Diagnoses of lymph node metastasis were established by 18F-FDG PET-CT and/or biopsy pathology. Three hundred and forty-seven cases meeting the criteria were divided into three groups: pathology-confirmed primary with invasive biopsy or surgery of the suspicious lesion (group A, n = 64), primary still unknown even with invasive biopsy or surgery of the suspicious lesion (group B, n = 204), and others with no suspicious lesion or lesions who had not been sampled due to medical or other reasons (group C, n = 79). We assessed the clinicopathological features between these groups, and the relationship between lymph node metastasis pattern and confirmed primary site. RESULTS: In group A, the primary sites of 61 cases were compatible with sentinel node theory, resulting in a positive predictive value of 95%. No significant differences in age, sex, bone metastasis, or visceral metastasis observed between group A and group B, except that group A had a higher ratio of differentiated carcinoma (94% vs. 77%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first evidence indicating that the majority of clinical CUP cases follow the sentinel node theory to spread in lymph nodes, which helps tracking the primary, especially for differentiated carcinoma.

Impact of PET/CT on clinical management in patients with cancer of unknown primary-a PET/CT registry study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of PET/CT on clinical management in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). METHODS: A cohort of patients with CUP undergoing PET/CT was prospectively enrolled in a local PET/CT registry study between April 2013 and June 2018. Questionnaire data from referring physicians on intended patient management prior and after PET/CT were recorded including items on the intended treatment concept and intended additional diagnostics. Changes in management after PET/CT were recorded. Patient outcome of different cohorts was analyzed for overall survival drawn from patient records. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients (53 female; 63.4 ± 12.1 years) were included. Intended therapeutic management was revised in 45.8% of patients after PET/CT, including major changes affecting the intended treatment goal in 26.5% of patients and minor changes (therapy adjustments) in 19.3% of patients. Invasive and additional diagnostic procedures were intended in 25.8% and 63.2% prior PET/CT and 13.5% and 6.5% after PET/CT. PET/CT-based curative therapy concepts were associated with significantly longer patient survival (4.7 ± 0.3 years) than palliative therapy concepts (1.8 ± 0.5 years, p = .0001). Patients with cervical CUP showed a significantly longer survival (4.3 ± 0.3 years) than patients with extracervical CUP (3.5 ± 0.5 years, p = .01). The identification of the primary did not significantly affect survival. CONCLUSION: This registry study confirms previous studies reporting that PET/CT significantly influences clinical management in patients with CUP, helping physicians to select a more individualized treatment and to avoid additional diagnostics. Furthermore, we could confirm that tumor localization and extent as shown by PET/CT have a significant impact on patient prognosis. KEY POINTS: • PET/CT significantly influences intended clinical management in patients with CUP, helping physicians to select a more individualized treatment and to avoid additional diagnostics. • Tumor localization and extent as shown by PET/CT have a significant impact on patient prognosis. • The identification of the primary tumor has no significant impact on overall patient survival.

Impact of initial imaging with gallium-68 dotatate PET/CT on diagnosis and management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analog functional imaging with gallium-68 (Ga-68) dotatate positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has demonstrated superiority in lesion detection in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The clinical impact of this imaging modality on US surgical and medical oncology practices has not been established. METHODS: Consecutive patients with NET at our institution who received an initial Ga-68 dotatate PET/CT between July 2017 and September 2018 were included. Ga-68 dotatate PET/CT was compared with prior imaging. RESULTS: Among 101 eligible patients, 51 of 50 were female/male, site of origin was gastroenteropancreatic (75%), unknown primary (13%), lung (8%), thymus (2%), and other (2%). All NETs were histologically well/moderately differentiated. Ga-68 dotatate imaging findings altered management in 36 (35.6%) patients: documentation of progression led to the initiation of systemic therapy in 14 patients, obviated the need for biopsy in four patients, and altered surgical plans in 7 of 14 (50%) patients referred for surgery. In 11 patients, decisions regarding peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy and somatostatin analogs were altered. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, Ga-68 dotatate PET/CT altered diagnosis and management in one-third of patients and changed operative plans in half of the patients who were referred for surgical evaluation. These results support the routine use of this imaging in the care of patients with early-stage and advanced NETs.

Accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT and predictive factors for extracapsular spread in unknown primary head and neck squamous cell cancer.

AIM: To determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for nodal extracapsular spread (ECS) and identify predictive radiological signs and clinicopathological features for ECS in unknown-primary head and neck squamous cell cancer (UPHNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CECT imaging of patients who underwent primary neck dissection for UPHNSCC during 2011-2015 was analysed. The largest pathological-looking node at each radiologically involved level was evaluated in consensus by two head and neck radiologists. Parameters included longest diameter, margin sharpness, haziness in adjacent fat, necrosis, and loss of fat plane with adjacent structures. Independent assessment was also made regarding the presence/absence of ECS. Findings and clinicopathological parameters were correlated with histopathology. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with 39 neck levels had metastatic nodal involvement determined on CECT. Confirmed ECS was found at 26 levels in 23 patients. Sensitivity of radiological assessment for ECS by nodal level was 81-85% (95% confidence interval [CI]=65-93%) and specificity 46-54% (95% CI=19-81%); kappa 0.87. On univariate analysis based on the largest involved node per patient, longest diameter being ≥30 mm (p=0.007), haziness in adjacent fat (p=0.023), increasing age (p=0.006), and more advanced pathological nodal status (p=0.027) were statistically significantly associated with ECS. Haziness and increasing age were independent predictors on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]=26.4 and 1.24). CONCLUSION: Expert assessment of ECS on CECT had good sensitivity with excellent interobserver agreement. A longest nodal diameter of ≥30 mm, haziness in the surrounding fat on CECT, advanced pathological nodal status, and advancing patient age were significantly associated with ECS in UPHNSCC patients, findings not previously reported.

Does PET/CT Aid in Detecting Primary Carcinoma in Patients with Skeletal Metastases of Unknown Primary?

BACKGROUND: Patients older than 40 years presenting with osteolytic bone lesions are likely to have a diagnosis of carcinoma, even if they had no prior cancer diagnosis. For patients with no prior cancer diagnosis, there is a well-accepted algorithm to determine a potential primary site. That algorithm, however, leaves approximately 15% of people without a detectable primary tumor site, making treatment decisions extremely difficult. Positron emission tomography (PET) fused with CT, more commonly known as PET/CT, has emerged as an important staging modality for many other malignancies but has been used in a very limited fashion in musculoskeletal oncology. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) What is the ability of PET/CT to detect the source of the primary tumor in patients with a skeletal metastasis of unknown primary? (2) How does PET/CT perform in detecting metastases in other sites in patients with a skeletal metastasis of unknown primary? METHODS: A retrospective analysis between 2006 and 2016 of the pathology database of a single tertiary center identified 35 patients with a biopsy-proven skeletal metastasis (histologically confirmed carcinoma or adenocarcinoma) and a PET/CT scan that was performed after the standard diagnostic evaluation of the primary cancer site. Patients were identified through use of our pathology database to identify all biopsy-proven bone carcinomas. This was then cross referenced with our imaging database to identify all patients who were at any time evaluated with PET/CT. During this time, we identified 1075 patients with biopsy-proven metastatic bone disease through our pathology database. Any indication for a PET/CT was included, and was most often done for staging of the identified malignancy or evaluation for the unknown source. Data regarding the ability of PET/CT to find or confirm the primary cancer and all metastatic sites were evaluated. The standard diagnostic evaluation (history and physical, laboratory evaluation, CT of the chest/abdomen/pelvis and whole body bone scan) identified the primary cancer in 22 of the 35 patients. Among the 35 patients, there were a total of 176 metastatic sites of disease identified, with 115 identified with the standard diagnostic evaluation (before PET/CT). RESULTS: Among patients with a skeletal metastasis of unknown primary, PET/CT was unable to identify the primary cancer in 12 of 13 patients. PET/CT confirmed the site of the known primary cancer in all 22 patients. There were 176 total metastatic sites. Of the 115 metastases known before PET/CT, PET/CT failed to identify three of 115 (3% false-negative rate). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT may not provide any additional benefit over the standard evaluation for identification of the primary cancer in patients with a skeletal metastasis of unknown primary, although it may have efficacy as a screening tool equivalent or superior to the standard diagnostic algorithm for evaluation of the overall metastatic burden in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

[Cervical CUP syndrome]. / CUP-Syndrom im Halsbereich.

The term CUP syndrome (cancer of unknown primary) refers to a multifaceted clinical picture in which the affected patients have lymph node and/or distant metastases without the location of the primary tumor being known. The criteria of CUP syndrome are fulfilled if a histologically or cytologically confirmed malignancy is present without a detectable primary tumor after completion of the primary diagnosis. Due to the usually poor prognosis and the manifold appearance, which often does not allow a standardized therapy, cervical CUP syndrome makes specific demands on clinical and imaging diagnostics. Using modern techniques such as positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), imaging plays a key role in the detection of a possible occult primary tumor as well as in staging and prognosis assessment.

Comparative cohort study of volumetric modulated arc therapy for squamous cell cancer of unknown primary in the head and neck-Involved neck only versus mucosal irradiation.

OBJECTIVES: Target volumes for irradiation remain ill-defined for squamous cell cancer of unknown primary in the head and neck (SCCUP). The aim of this study was to compare involved neck only (INO) radiotherapy (RT) with irradiating involved neck plus potential mucosal primary sites and contralateral neck (MUC) in patients diagnosed and treated with modern diagnostics and techniques. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with a diagnosis of SCCUP with unilateral neck disease were included. RESULTS: Thirty patients were identified. All underwent FDG PET-CT. 47% of patients had HPV-positive SCC. 20 patients received RT to INO, 10 patients to MUC, all with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). A significantly lower dose for each organ at risk was delivered in INO-treated patients, with mean dose to contralateral parotid gland 57% less. The proportion of patients with late grade 2 or worse xerostomia was higher in MUC patients. The incidence of grade 2-3 mucositis (89% vs 45%) and grade 3 or worse dysphagia (50% vs 10%) was higher in MUC patients. Median follow-up was 31 months. No mucosal primaries emerged. Progression-free survival at 2 years was 74.7% for INO patients, 70% in the MUC group. Overall survival at 2 years was 79.7% in the INO group and 70% in the MUC patients. CONCLUSION: INO radiotherapy for patients with SCCUP of the head and neck is a safe treatment strategy resulting in clinically significant lower RT doses to OARS. Acute and late toxicities are reduced without detriment to patient survival.

Palatine tonsil SUVmax on FDG PET-CT as a discriminator between benign and malignant tonsils in patients with and without head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary.

AIM: To analyse the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) ratio between tonsils in patients with and without tonsillar carcinoma to determine useful diagnostic thresholds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) examinations of patients with suspected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and controls from April 2013 to September 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Tonsillar SUVmax ratios (ipsilateral/contralateral for malignant tonsils, maximum/minimum for patients without [controls]) were calculated and used to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients had tonsillar carcinoma (mean SUVmax ratio of 2, range 0.89-5.4) and 86 patients acted as controls (mean SUVmax ratio of 1.1, range 1-1.5). Using the ROC, the most accurate SUVmax ratio for identifying malignancy was >1.2 (77% sensitivity, 86% specificity). A potentially more clinically useful SUVmax ratio is ≥1.6 with 62% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSION: An SUVmax ratio between tonsils of ≥1.6 is highly suspicious for SCC and could be used to direct site of biopsy. Some malignant tonsils had normal FDG uptake; therefore, PET/CT should not be used to exclude tonsillar cancer. Minor asymmetrical uptake is frequently seen in non-malignant tonsils and does not necessarily require further investigation. Due to the single centre nature of this study and the recognised variation in SUV measurements between PET scans, other centres may need to develop their own cut-offs.

Screening for Occult Cancer in Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism may be the earliest sign of cancer. Currently, there is a great diversity in practices regarding screening for occult cancer in a person who has an unprovoked venous thromboembolism. We sought to assess the efficacy of a screening strategy for occult cancer that included comprehensive computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis in patients who had a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial in Canada. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo limited occult-cancer screening (basic blood testing, chest radiography, and screening for breast, cervical, and prostate cancer) or limited occult-cancer screening in combination with CT. The primary outcome measure was confirmed cancer that was missed by the screening strategy and detected by the end of the 1-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Of the 854 patients who underwent randomization, 33 (3.9%) had a new diagnosis of occult cancer between randomization and the 1-year follow-up: 14 of the 431 patients (3.2%) in the limited-screening group and 19 of the 423 patients (4.5%) in the limited-screening-plus-CT group (P=0.28). In the primary outcome analysis, 4 occult cancers (29%) were missed by the limited screening strategy, whereas 5 (26%) were missed by the strategy of limited screening plus CT (P=1.0). There was no significant difference between the two study groups in the mean time to a cancer diagnosis (4.2 months in the limited-screening group and 4.0 months in the limited-screening-plus-CT group, P=0.88) or in cancer-related mortality (1.4% and 0.9%, P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of occult cancer was low among patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism. Routine screening with CT of the abdomen and pelvis did not provide a clinically significant benefit. (Funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; SOME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00773448.).

Detection of clinically occult primary tumours in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumours: comparison of three-dimensional THRIVE MRI, two-dimensional spin-echo MRI, and contrast-enhanced CT.

AIM: To evaluate and compare the utility of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume examination (THRIVE), spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) for detecting clinically occult primary tumours in patients with cervical lymph node metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients with tumours that went undetected during endoscopic or physical examinations underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI (SE and 3D THRIVE) after gadolinium injection. Guided biopsy results served as reference standards. The diagnostic performances of the imaging techniques were compared with McNemar's tests. RESULTS: Primary tumours were identified in 59 (80.8%) of the 73 patients after surgery. Of these, 36 were found in the palatine tonsil, 11 in the base of the tongue, seven in the nasopharynx, and five in the pyriform sinus. The sensitivity (72.9%) and accuracy (71.2%) of 3D THRIVE for detecting primary tumours were higher than were those of SE T1-weighted MRI (49.2% and 53.4%, p≤0.002) or CT (36.4% and 46.4%, p≤0.001). The specificities of these techniques did not differ. The diagnostic performance of 3D THRIVE (area under the curve [AUC]=0.681) for detecting tumours did not differ from that of SE T1-weighted MRI or CT (AUC=0.671 and 0.608, p>0.05). CONCLUSION: 3D THRIVE was more sensitive at detecting primary tumours than was SE T1-weighted MRI or CT in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumours. This sequence may improve biopsy and therapeutic planning in these patients.

The Evaluation of Cutaneous Metastasis from an Unknown Primary.

We present the case of a man that had a rapidly growing nodule on his face. Removal of the lesion was more difficult than anticipated because it was tightly adherent to adjacent tissue. Pathology from the lesion showed a malignant neoplasm thought to have arisen at a distant site. The evaluation of this patient may provide insights into the workup for patients that present with cutaneous metastatic malignancies of unknown etiology. In general, these patients need to be fully evaluated in an attempt to locate the primary lesion. When a primary lesion can not be ascertained, careful surveillance of the patient is warranted. We present suggestions for evaluation of patients with cutaneous metastatic lesions without an obvious primary. It is clear that molecular pathology will provide additional information to help identify the primary lesion. Scanning of areas likely to be the source using CT PET/ CT and MRI studies may also yield information. Finally, a careful history and physical examination are also important for these patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(7):804-806.