Prevention of peritoneal adhesions after gynecological surgery: a systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: The formation of adhesions after gynecological surgery not only has detrimental impacts on those affected, including pain, obstruction, and infertility, but also imposes a high economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the adhesion prevention potential of all currently available adhesion barriers for gynecological surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We systematically searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of adhesion barriers as compared with peritoneal irrigation or no treatment in gynecological surgery. Only RCTs with second-look surgery to evaluate adhesions in the pelvic/abdominal (but not intrauterine) cavity were included. RESULTS: We included 45 RCTs with a total of 4,120 patients examining a total of 10 unique types of barriers in second-look gynecological surgery. While RCTs on oxidized regenerated cellulose (significant improvement in 6 of 14 trials), polyethylene glycol with/without other agents (4/10), hyaluronic acid and hyaluronate + carboxymethylcellulose (7/10), icodextrin (1/3), dextran (0/3), fibrin-containing agents (1/2), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (1/1), N,O-carboxymethylchitosan (0/1), and modified starch (1/1) overall showed inconsistent findings, results for expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, hyaluronic acid, and modified starch yielded the greatest improvements regarding adhesion reduction at 75%, 0-67%, and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Best results for adhesion prevention were reported after applying Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane, hyaluronic acid, and 4DryField®. As Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane is nonabsorbable, it is associated with a greater risk of new adhesion formation due to second-look surgery to remove the product. 4DryField® yielded the greatest improvement in adhesion score compared to all other barrier agents (85%). For better comparability, future studies should use standardized scores and put more emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures, such as pain and infertility.

Fouling-resistant zwitterionic polymers for complete prevention of postoperative adhesion.

Postoperative adhesions are most common issues for almost any types of abdominal and pelvic surgery, leading to adverse consequences. Pharmacological treatments and physical barrier devices are two main approaches to address postoperative adhesions but can only alleviate or reduce adhesions to some extent. There is an urgent need for a reliable approach to completely prevent postoperative adhesions and to significantly improve the clinical outcomes, which, however, is unmet with current technologies. Here we report that by applying a viscous, cream-like yet injectable zwitterionic polymer solution to the traumatized surface, postoperative adhesion was completely and reliably prevented in three clinically relevant but increasingly challenging models in rats. The success rate of full prevention is over 93% among 42 animals tested, which is a major leap in antiadhesion performance. Clinically used Interceed film can hardly prevent the adhesion in any of these models. Unlike current antiadhesion materials serving solely as physical barriers, the "nonfouling" zwitterionic polymer functioned as a protective layer for antiadhesion applications with the inherent benefit of resisting protein/cell adhesions. The nonfouling nature of the polymer prevented the absorption of fibronectins and fibroblasts, which contribute to the initial and late-stage development of the adhesion, respectively. This is the key working mechanism that differentiated our "complete prevention" approach from current underperforming antiadhesion materials. This work implies a safe, effective, and convenient way to fully prevent postoperative adhesions suffered by current surgical patients.

Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Peritoneal Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review.

Peritoneal adhesions are responsible for several and sometimes severe clinical phenotypes remaining a major problem for many patients today. Adhesions are formed within the peritoneal cavity as a result of surgery, inflammation, or injury and can cause a range of clinical symptoms, including abdominal pain, small bowel obstruction, infertility, and other complications. The incidence of peritoneal adhesions remains high as it is estimated that more than 50% of patients who undergo abdominal surgery will develop adhesions. Although advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative management have been developed, the risk of adhesion formation cannot be eliminated, and thus, the development of effective prevention strategies and treatments remains a priority in the field of surgery. In this review, we summarize the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the peritoneal adhesions, but also the experimental therapy approaches that have been investigated toward a solution to their possible clinical phenotypes.

Comparison of Oral Sirolimus, Prednisolone, and Combination of Both in Experimentally Induced Peritoneal Adhesion.

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal adhesion formation is a challenging postoperative complication. We aim to evaluate the effect of orally administered sirolimus, prednisolone, and their combination to prevent this entity. METHODS: Eighty female albino underwent intraperitoneal injection of 3 mL of 10% sterile talc solution to induce peritoneal adhesion, and were subsequently and randomly divided into four groups (each n = 20); including a control group; 1 mg/kg oral prednisolone daily in the morning; 0.1 mg/kg oral sirolimus daily; and a combination group which received both drugs, with the same dosage. On the 29th day, abdominal cavities were explored, and classification was done based on Nair classification. RESULTS: All rats were healthy on the 29th day, in which exploration was performed. The rats in the control group had extensive intra-abdominal adhesions, while 17 (85%) rats in the control group had substantial adhesion; however, the prednisolone, sirolimus, and combination group had lesser adhesion formation. Also, 14 (70%) rats of prednisolone group, 13 (65%) of sirolimus group, and 16 (80%) of combination group had insubstantial adhesion. The decrease in the grade of peritoneal adhesion bands was highly significant in the combination group (P > 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sirolimus and prednisolone was effective for preventing peritoneal adhesions in rats.

The novel mechanism of valproate to prevent peritoneal adhesion formation.

PURPOSE: A novel pharmacological mechanism of valproate was analyzed using a hamster model of adhesion. METHODS: Valproate or placebo was administered just after cecal injury and adhesion severity scores and histological were analyzed. RESULTS: The adhesion severity scores in the placebo- and valproate-treated groups were 2.67 ± 0.42 and 1.0 ± 0.37, respectively, with a significant difference between the groups. A significant increase in mast cell numbers was observed in the placebo-treated group vs. the sham-operated group; however, the mast cell number in the adhesive lesion was significantly lower in the valproate-treated group than in the placebo-treated group. The number of cells positive for chymase, an enzyme in mast cells, in the adhesive lesion was significantly higher in the placebo-treated group, but its increase was attenuated significantly by treatment with valproate. The myeloperoxidase gene expression level in the cecum was significantly higher in the placebo-treated group than in the sham-operated group, but there was no significant difference in the myeloperoxidase gene expression level between the sham-operated and valproate-treated groups in. In an in vitro experiment, valproate inhibited purified human and hamster chymases dose-dependently. CONCLUSION: The chymase inhibitory effect of valproate may contribute to prevent adhesion formation after abdominal injury.

Inhibition of KIF20A by BKS0349 reduces endometriotic lesions in a xenograft mouse model.

Several studies have suggested a possible etiological association between ovarian endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Evidence has shown that KIF20A overexpression might confer a malignant phenotype to ovarian tumors by promoting proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis. However, no data about the role of KIF20A in endometriosis have been described. In this study, the human endometrium (n = 4) was transfected by mCherry adenovirus and intraperitoneally implanted in mice. Subsequently, mice were divided in three groups (n = 8/group) that were treated with Vehicle, BKS0349 (KIF20A-antagonist) or cabergoline (dopamine receptor agonist) for 21 days. mCherry-labeled endometriotic lesions were monitored over time using the IVIS Imaging System. Mice were sacrificed 72 h after the last administration; proliferation was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and apoptosis by TUNEL. CCND1 gene expression (G1 phase-related gene) was measured by qRT-PCR. A significant reduction in mCherry-fluorescent signal was observed in the BKS0349 group after treatment ended (D24) compared with D0 (P-value = 0.0313). Moreover, the mCherry signal on D24 showed a significant decrease in the BKS0349 group compared with controls (P-value = 0.0303), along with significant size reduction of endometriotic lesions observed in the BKS0349 group compared with control on D24 (P-value = 0.0006). Functional studies showed a significant reduction in proliferating cells in the BKS0349-treated group compared with controls (P-value = 0.0082). In addition, CCND1 expression was decreased in the BKS0349 group compared with control (P-value = 0.049) at D24 and a significant increase in apoptotic cells among endometriotic lesions in BKS0349-treated mice was observed compared with control (P-value = 0.0317). Based on these findings, we concluded that BKS0349 induces apoptosis and inhibits cell proliferation, reducing endometriotic lesion size and suggesting KIF20A inhibition by BKS0349 as a novel therapeutic treatment for endometriosis.

20(S)-Ginsenoside Rg3-loaded electrospun membranes to prevent postoperative peritoneal adhesion.

Postoperative peritoneal adhesions are one of the most common surgical complications. In this study, we developed a 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg3-loaded methoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-block-poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (mPEG-b-PLGA) electrospun membrane (PEM/Rg3) that could not only serve as a physical barrier, but also as a drug delivery system that releases 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg3 constantly to prevent postoperative peritoneal adhesions. The characteristics of PEM/Rg3, including scanning electron microscopy, water contact angle, and mechanical analyses, were assessed. Degradation and drug release assays of PEM/Rg3 were performed. The anti-adhesion efficacy of PEM/Rg3 was evaluated in an abdomen-cecum mouse model. The adhesion scores, adhesion areas, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, immunofluorescence, and western blotting were assessed. The 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg3 loaded mPEG-b-PLGA electrospun fibers were successfully fabricated. The fibers were smooth, with no obvious drug crystals. PEM/Rg3 membranes were biodegradable and could be degraded gradually to release 20(S)-Ginsenoside Rg3 constantly from the membranes. The animal study showed that PEM/Rg3 exhibited an excellent adhesion prevention ability when compared with the control group, the PEM group, and polylactic acid (PLA) commercial membrane (Surgiwrap™) group. Immunofluorescence and western blotting studies showed that PEM/Rg3 inhibited the expressions of interleukin 1 (IL-1), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and reactive oxygen species modulator-1 (ROMO1). The 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg3-loaded mPEG-b-PLGA electrospun membranes exhibited satisfactory anti-adhesion efficacy by inhibiting inflammatory responses and oxidative stress. This composite represents a promising strategy to prevent postoperative peritoneal adhesions.

The Efficacy of an Ultrapure Alginate Gel in Reducing Adhesion Formation in a Rat Model of Blood Contamination.

BACKGROUND: Formation of peritoneal adhesions is the most frequent complication of abdominal and pelvic surgery and comprises a lifelong risk of adhesion-related morbidity and mortality. Some of the existing antiadhesive barriers are less effective in the presence of blood. In this study, we investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrapure alginate gel in the presence of blood. METHODS: In experiment 1 (30 rats), 1 mL ultrapure alginate gel was compared with no intervention in a model of cecal abrasion and persisting peritoneal bleeding by incision of the epigastric artery. In experiment 2 (30 rats), 2 mL ultrapure alginate gel was compared with no intervention in a model where a 1 mL blood clot was instilled intra-abdominally and a cecal resection was performed. The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of adhesions after 14 d. RESULTS: In experiment 1, seven of 15 rats in the experimental group had intra-abdominal adhesions compared with 13 of 15 rats in the control group (P = 0.05); 3 of 15 rats had adhesions at the site of injury compared with 12 of 15 rats in the control group (P < 0.01). The severity and extent of adhesions was also reduced (P < 0.01). In experiment 2, 12 of 13 rats had adhesions compared with 13 of 14 rats in the control group (P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrapure alginate gel reduces the incidence and severity of adhesion in the presence of persisting bleeding, but not in a model of cecal resection and blood clot.

The Prevention of Hepatectomy-Induced Adhesions by Bilayer Sponge Composed of Ultrapure Alginate.

BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation is a critical issue in surgery, particularly in hepatectomy. The present study aimed to develop a bilayer adhesion barrier comprising alginate (Alg) of different molecular weight (Mw). It was expected that a slowly dissolving layer remains on the cut surface, functioning as a physical barrier, whereas a rapidly dissolving layer widely distributes in the peritoneal cavity to prevent de novo adhesions. METHODS: Bilayer Alg sponges were fabricated using low Mw Alg for the upper layer and high Mw Alg for the bottom layer. The dissolution behavior of each layer was evaluated in vitro in peritoneum-like environments. We constructed a Pean crush hepatectomy-induced adhesion model in rats. The effects of the bilayer sponge on cut surface and de novo adhesions were separately evaluated in terms of their extent and grade. RESULTS: The Alg sponge layer with low Mw dissolved faster than that with high Mw in vitro. One week after the hepatectomy, although no significant decrease in adhesion extent on the cut surface was observed in rats that received Seprafilm and Interceed, treatment with Alg bilayer sponge significantly decreased the adhesion extent to 38% of that without treatment. Moreover, a significant decrease in de novo adhesion extent was observed in the Alg bilayer sponge compared with the Interceed group. CONCLUSIONS: The Alg bilayer sponge was effective for preventing both cut surface and de novo adhesions in the rat Pean crush hepatectomy model. The simple yet functional design of the Alg bilayer sponge can facilitate its use in future clinical practice.

The systemic effect and the absorption rate of aerosolized intra-peritoneal heparin with or without hyaluronic acid in the prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions.

BACKGROUND: Adhesions are a known cause of morbidity and mortality following abdominal surgery. Multiple approaches have been evaluated to prevent or minimize the occurrence of adhesions. Administration of aerosolized heparin and hyaluronic acid is an effective method to prevent postoperative adhesions whether they are used independently or in synergism. However, absorption rate and the systemic effect of heparin given intra-peritoneal have never been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the systemic effect and the absorption rate of heparin with or without hyaluronic acid in the prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study comparing thirty rats (n = 30) divided into 3 groups, each consisting of 10 rats. First group (n = 10) received aerosolized intra-peritoneal heparin (IPH). Second group (n = 10) received intra-peritoneal heparin with hyaluronic acid (IPHHA). Intravenous heparin (IVH) was given to the third group (n = 10). Serum heparin levels were measured and compared between the groups over 120 min's period. RESULTS: None of the rats had intra-operative bleeding. The level of serum heparin was significantly lower in the IPHHA group compared to IPH and the IVH at all points of measurements (30, 60, 90, and 120 min) (p < 0.0001). The serum level of heparin of all groups peaked at 90 min. Area-under-the-curve 0-120 was significantly lower in the IPHHA group as compared to both IPH and IVH (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The aerosolized intra-peritoneal administration of heparin or heparin with hyaluronic acid resulted in minimal systemic absorption rendering it safe for the use as method to prevent intra-peritoneal adhesions. Human studies are planed next.

Comparison of adhesion prevention capabilities of the modified starch powder-based medical devices 4DryField® PH and Arista™ AH in the Optimized Peritoneal Adhesion Model.

Adhesion barriers can be based on numerous substances. In the rat Optimized Peritoneal Adhesion Model (OPAM) the starch-based hemostats 4DryField and Arista were tested for their capability to act in a preventive manner against adhesion formation (applied as a powder that was mixed in situ with saline solution to form a barrier gel). Adhesions were scored using the established scoring systems by Lauder and Hoffmann, as well as histopathologically using the score by Zühlke. Animals receiving saline solution were used as controls. As previously published, 4DryField reduced peritoneal adhesions significantly. However, Arista did not lead to a statistically significant reduction of adhesion formation. When comparing 4DryField and Arista applied in the same manner, only 4DryField was significantly effective in preventing peritoneal adhesions. Histopathological evaluations confirmed the results of the macroscopic investigation, leading to the conclusion that starch-based hemostats do not generally have the capability to function as effective adhesion prevention devices.

The prevention effects of cryptotanshinone nanoemulsion on postoperative peritoneal adhesions.

The purpose of this study was to prepare a novel cryptotanshinone-loaded nanoemulsion (Cry LN) and to evaluate its prevention effect on the postoperative peritoneal adhesions (PPA). The Cry LN was prepared by high-pressure homogenization method, and various methods were used to investigate the physicochemical properties. The results showed that Cry LN has nanoscale particle size with uniform distribution and could slowly release the incorporated drug compared with Cry solution. With superior safety, Cry LN could increase the ratio of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) up to 673% compared with control group. Furthermore, in vivo animal study confirmed the Cry LN activated the fibrinolytic system and successfully prevented PPA formation in rat. In conclusion, Cry nanoemulsion could be considered as a potentially promising and effective strategy for PPA treatment.

Developmental endothelial locus-1 prevents development of peritoneal adhesions in mice.

Postoperative peritoneal adhesions, fibrous bands formed in the peritoneal cavity following surgery, represent a common, challenging and costly problem faced by surgeons and patients, for which effective therapeutic options are lacking. Since aberrant inflammation is one of the key mechanisms underlying peritoneal adhesion formation, here we set out to study the role of developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del-1), which has been recently identified as an endogenous inhibitor of inflammation, in the formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions using a mouse model of peritoneal adhesions induced by ischemic buttons. Del-1-deficient mice had a higher incidence of adhesions, and their adhesions had higher quality and tenacity scores. Del-1 deficiency also led to enhanced inflammation mediators and collagen production. Finally, Del-1 supplementation decreased the incidence and severity of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Taken together, these results indicate a protective role for Del-1 in postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation.

Acellular derivatives of mesenchymal stem cells prevent peritoneal adhesions in an animal model.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal adhesions are nonanatomical connections that bind organs to the abdominal wall or among them. They arise after peritoneal injury, which triggers an inflammatory response followed by a healing process that leads to fibrotic tissue formation. Mesenchymal stem cells and their secretion products, also referred to as acellular derivatives (ACDs), have anti-inflammatory, fibrinolytic, and antifibrogenic properties. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intraoperative administration of ACD on the appearance, severity, and progression of peritoneal adhesions, in an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cecal erosions were mechanically induced in adult mice. Before closure, the vehicle, ACD, or Seprafilm was administered. Seven days later, the presence and grade of peritoneal adhesions were assessed macroscopically. One, 3, and 7 d after intervention, molecular and cellular markers of inflammation, fibrinolysis, and fibrogenesis were evaluated both locally and systemically. RESULTS: ACDs avoided the appearance of clinically relevant peritoneal adhesions. The vehicle had no effect, and Seprafilm reduced them inconsistently. The antiadhesive effect of ACD was associated with an early reduction of proinflammatory cytokine (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma) secretion and leukocyte (polymorphonuclears, mononuclears, and macrophages) infiltration. High levels of D-dimer, low fibrin deposits, low myofibroblasts infiltration, and less fibrosis were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: ACD administered at the end of abdominal surgeries prevents the formation of peritoneal adhesions due to the modulation of inflammatory, fibrinolytic, and fibrogenic processes.

Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy, the surgical removal of the appendix, is performed primarily for acute appendicitis. Patients who undergo appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, defined as gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, are more likely to suffer from postoperative complications. The routine use of abdominal drainage to reduce postoperative complications after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is controversial.This is an update of the review first published in 2015. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, 2017, Issue 6), Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to 30 June 2017), Ovid Embase (1974 to 30 June 2017), Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to 30 June 2017), World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (30 June 2017), ClinicalTrials.gov (30 June 2017) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) (1978 to 30 June 2017). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared abdominal drainage and no drainage in people undergoing emergency open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors identified the trials for inclusion, collected the data, and assessed the risk of bias independently. We performed the meta-analyses using Review Manager 5. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (or a Peto odds ratio for very rare outcomes), and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to rate the quality of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included six RCTs (521 participants), comparing abdominal drainage and no drainage in patients undergoing emergency open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. The studies were conducted in North America, Asia and Africa. The majority of the participants had perforated appendicitis with local or general peritonitis. All participants received antibiotic regimens after open appendectomy. None of the trials was at low risk of bias.There was insufficient evidence to determine the effects of abdominal drainage and no drainage on intra-peritoneal abscess at 14 days (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.47 to 3.21; 5 RCTs; 453 participants; very low-quality evidence) or for wound infection at 14 days (RR 2.01, 95% CI 0.88 to 4.56; 5 RCTs; 478 participants; very low-quality evidence). The increased risk of 30-day overall complication rate (morbidity) in the drainage group was rated as very low-quality evidence (RR 6.67, 95% CI 2.13 to 20.87; 1 RCT; 90 participants). There were seven deaths in the drainage group (N = 183) compared to one in the no drainage group (N = 180), equating to an increase in the risk of 30-day mortality from 0.6% to 2.7% (Peto odds ratio (OR) 4.88, 95% CI 1.18 to 20.09; 4 RCTs; 363 participants; moderate-quality evidence). There is 'very low-quality' evidence that drainage increases hospital stay compared to the no drainage group by 2.17 days (95% CI 1.76 to 2.58; 3 RCTs; 298 participants).Other outlined outcomes, hospital costs, pain, and quality of life, were not reported in any of the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the current evidence is very low. The effect of abdominal drainage on the prevention of intra-peritoneal abscess or wound infection after open appendectomy is uncertain for patients with complicated appendicitis. The increased rates for overall complication rate and hospital stay for the drainage group compared to no drainage group is also subject to great uncertainty. Thus, there is no evidence for any clinical improvement by using abdominal drainage in patients undergoing open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. The increased risk of mortality with drainage comes from eight deaths observed in just under 400 people recruited to the studies. Larger studies are needed to determine the effects of drainage on morbidity and mortality outcomes more reliably.

The effect of Resveratrol and Octreotide on peritoneal adhesions in a rat model.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of resveratrol and octreotide, agents that are used to prevent intra-abdominal adhesions in experimental models, in preventing intraperitoneal adhesions when used alone or in combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study employed 28 young female Wistar albino rats weighing 250-300 grams. An experimental adhesion model was created in each rat using serosal abrasion and peritoneal excision. They were divided into four groups, each comprising seven rats: Group 1, adhesion induction only; Group 2, resveratrol administration only; Group 3, octreotide administration only; and Group 4, administration of resveratrol and octreotide combination. The rats were monitored under appropriate conditions for 14 days and then underwent laparotomy. Macroscopic intensity and extensiveness of adhesions and microscopic changes in the granulation tissue (cellular intensity, reticular and collagen fibers, capillaries, elastic and smooth muscle fibers, fibrosis) were evaluated and graded. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-test were used in statistical analysis and the level of statistical significance was established as p <0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the intensity and extensiveness of macroscopic adhesions (p=0.377 and p=0.319). There was a statistically significant difference between the microscopic scores of the groups according to Zühlke's classification (p=0.026). The Bonferroni correction used to test for the differences revealed that the rats in Group 1 achieved significantly higher scores than the rats in Group 3 (p=0.016). CONCLUSION: Octreotide showed higher efficiency compared to the control group in microscopic classification; however, the two agents were not superior to each other or their combination was not superior in preventing intra-abdominal adhesions.

Intraperitoneal administration of activated protein C prevents postsurgical adhesion band formation.

Postsurgical peritoneal adhesion bands are the most important causes of intestinal obstruction, pelvic pain, and female infertility. In this study, we used a mouse model of adhesion and compared the protective effect of activated protein C (APC) to that of the Food and Drug Administration-approved antiadhesion agent, sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) by intraperitoneal administration of either APC or Seprafilm to experimental animals. Pathological adhesion bands were graded on day 7, and peritoneal fluid concentrations of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), d-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, transforming growth factor-ß1) were evaluated. Inflammation scores were also measured based on histologic data obtained from peritoneal tissues. Relative to Seprafilm, intraperitoneal administration of human APC led to significantly higher reduction of postsurgical adhesion bands. Moreover, a markedly lower inflammation score was obtained in the adhesive tissues of the APC-treated group, which correlated with significantly reduced peritoneal concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines and an elevated tPA level. Further studies using variants of human APC with or without protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) signaling function and mutant mice deficient for either endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) or PAR1 revealed that the EPCR-dependent signaling activity of APC is primarily responsible for its protective activity in this model. These results suggest APC has therapeutic potential for preventing postsurgical adhesion bands.

Laparotomy causes loss of peritoneal mesothelium prevented by humidified CO2 insufflation in rats.

INTRODUCTION: Avoiding tissue desiccation is a common recommendation to reduce postoperative complications following open abdominal surgery, although difficult to achieve delicately without damaging the peritoneal mesothelium. Insufflation of humidified-warm CO2 into the abdomen during open abdominal surgery is proposed as an invisible, effortless way to prevent desiccation. We hypothesized that desiccation during open abdominal surgery would cause loss of peritoneal mesothelium that would be prevented by insufflation of humidified-warm CO2. METHODS: Nine Wistar rats were assigned to 1 h of anesthesia only, laparotomy only, or laparotomy with insufflation of humidified-warm CO2. Twelve hours after treatment, rats were euthanized and tissue samples were excised. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and light microscopy (LM) images of visceral and parietal peritoneum were scored by two independent, blinded examiners for loss of mesothelium and other indications of inflammation, including measurement of apoptosis by detection of DNA cleavage. RESULTS: Loss of peritoneal mesothelium was found in peritoneum exposed to laparotomy only (SEM: P = 0.002; LM: P = 0.01), and mesothelial loss was reduced by humidified-warm CO2 (SEM: P < 0.001; LM P = 0.004). Similarly, DNA cleavage was significantly higher on the peritoneal surface following laparotomy only, compared with anesthesia only (P = 0.0055) and laparotomy with humidified-warm CO2 insufflation (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: In a rat model, exposing the peritoneal mesothelial to conditions that replicate minimum recommended air flow within an operating room causes inadvertent loss of mesothelium and signs of inflammation that can be prevented by insufflating humidified-warm CO2 into the open abdominal cavity.

Effect of "phase change" complex on postoperative adhesion prevention.

BACKGROUND: Postsurgical peritoneal adhesion is a major clinical problem. Numerous anti-adhesion products have been studied, but none could be easily used to provide a physical barrier. In this study, we developed a "phase change" anti-adhesion barrier for reducing peritoneal adhesion by cross-linked copolymerization of O-carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) and CaCl2 and addition of cyclosporin A (CsA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CMC-CaCl2-CsA compound was characterized by equilibrium swelling rate, weight loss, releasing effect, and coagulation test, and its biosafety was characterized by acute oral toxicity, hemolysis, and cytotoxicity. Intestinal adhesion model was applied on 64 Sprague-Dawley rats, which received CMC, CMC-CaCl2, or CMC-CaCl2-CsA treatment. At postoperative days 7 and 14, the rats were euthanized, and adhesions were graded by an investigator blinded to the treatment groups, using a predetermined adhesion scoring system. The cecum and adhesion tissue were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and antibodies for matrix metalloproteinase-9 and TIMP-1 for further histopathologic examination. RESULTS: The phase change anti-adhesive material exhibited effective blood clotting and were nontoxic in clotting experiments and acute toxicity test. The degradation rate could be adjusted using phosphate-buffered solution with varying pH. Adhesions were significantly reduced in the CMC-CaCl2-CsA treatment group compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 was stronger in CMC-CaCl2-CsA treatment group at 7 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: "Phase-change" adhesive can undergo changes after application, and it inhibits the formation of abdominal adhesions after surgery. The material is convenient for using by surgeons and provides an effective tool for intestinal adhesion prevention.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Peritoneal Adhesion Prevention Devices in a Rat Model.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal operations are followed by adhesions, a prevalent cause of abdominal pain, and the most frequent cause for bowel obstruction and secondary female infertility. This rat study addresses adhesion prevention capability of Adept(®), Interceed(®), Seprafilm(®), and a novel device, 4DryField(®) PH which is provided as powder and generates its effect as gel. METHODS: Sixty-eight male Lewis rats had cecal abrasion and creation of an equally sized abdominal wall defect, and were grouped randomly: A control group without treatment (n=10); two groups treated with 4DryField(®) PH using premixed gel (n=15) or in-situ gel technique (n=16); one group each was treated with Seprafilm(®) (n=8), Interceed(®) (n=9), or Adept(®) (n=10). Sacrifice was on day 7 to evaluate incidence, quality, and quantity of adhesions, as expressed via adhesion reduction rate (AR). Histologic specimens were evaluated. Statistical analyses used ANOVA and unpaired t-tests. RESULTS: 4DryField(®) PH significantly reduced incidence and severity of adhesions both as premixed gel (AR: 85.2%) and as in-situ made gel (AR: 100%), a comparison between these two application techniques showed no differences in efficacy. Seprafilm(®) did not reduce incidence but severity of adhesions significantly (AR: 53.5%). With Interceed(®) (AR: 3.7%) and Adept(®) (AR: 16.1%) no significant adhesion-reduction was achieved. Except for inflammatory response with Interceed(®), histopathology showed good tissue compatibility of all other devices. CONCLUSION: 4DryField(®) PH and Seprafilm(®) showed significant adhesion prevention capabilities. 4DryField(®) PH achieved the highest adhesion prevention effectiveness without restrictions concerning mode of application and compatibility and, thus, is a promising strategy to prevent abdominal adhesions.