Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage versus laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in complicated acute diverticulitis: a multicenter prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) is feasible in selected patients with pelvic abscess and generalized purulent peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. We aimed to compare LPL and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in complicated acute diverticulitis. METHODS: This prospective, observational, multicenter study included patients with a pelvic abscess not amenable to conservative management and patients with Hinchey III acute diverticulitis, from 2015 to 2018. Sixty-six patients were enrolled: 28 (42%) underwent LPL and 38 (58%) underwent LS. In LS, patients had a primary anastomosis, with or without ileostomy, or an end colostomy (HA). Major outcomes were mortality, morbidity, failure of source control, reoperation, length of stay, and diverticulitis recurrence. RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar in the two groups. In LPL, ASA score > 2 and Mannheim Peritonitis Index were significantly higher (p = 0.05 and 0.004). In LS, 24 patients (63%) had a PA and 14 (37%) an HA. No death was recorded. Overall, morbidity was 33% in LPL and 18% in LS (p = 0.169). However, failure to achieve source control of the peritoneal infection and the need to return to the operating room were more frequent in LPL (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006). Mean postoperative length of stay was comparable (p = 0.08). Diverticular recurrence was significantly higher in LPL (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: LPL is related to a higher reoperation rate, more frequent postoperative ongoing sepsis, and higher recurrence rates. Therefore, laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis carries a high risk of failure in daily practice.

Laparoscopic Lavage in the Management of Hinchey Grade III Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic lavage and sigmoid resection in perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis. BACKGROUND: Peritonitis secondary to perforated diverticulitis has conventionally been managed by resection and stoma formation. Case series have suggested that patients can be safely managed with laparoscopic lavage, resulting in reduced mortality and stoma formation. Recently, 3 randomized controlled trials have published contradictory conclusions. METHODS: MEDLINE from 1946 to present, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane database of Registered clinical trials and EMBASE (all via OVID) were searched using the terms "laparoscopy" AND ("primary resection" OR "Hartmann procedure", OR "sigmoidectomy"), AND "Diverticulitis", AND "Peritonitis" AND "therapeutic irrigation" or "lavage" AND randomized controlled trial and any derivatives of those terms. We included all randomized controlled trials. Data were extracted from each study using a purpose-designed template. Statistical analysis was undertaken using Revman 5. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials were identified from 48 potential studies. The analysis included 307 patients of whom 159 underwent laparoscopic lavage. Overall, the rate of reintervention within 30 days postoperatively was 45/159 (28.3%) in the lavage group and 13/148 (8.8%) in the resection group (relative risk 3.01, 95% confidence interval 1.15-7.90). There was no significant difference in Intensive Care Unit admissions, 30 and 90-day mortality, or stoma rates at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lavage used in the management of Hinchey grade III diverticulitis leads to more reinterventions within 30 days postoperatively, but does not increase the 30 or 90-day mortality rates compared with sigmoid resection.

[Opportunities of intraoperative hyperthermic perfusion application in treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis].

Normothermic intraperitoneal perfusion (IPEP) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion (HIPEP) were performed in 44 Wistar female rats with transplanted ascites tumor of the ovary. Opportunities of intraoperative hyperthermic perfusion application in treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Antineoplastic affects were evaluated according to increase of animals' survival. IPEP and HIPEP increase median survival time by 78% (p=0.307) and 150% (p=0.005) respectively in comparison with conventional intraperitoneal introduction of physiological solution. Thus HIPEP has statistically more significant antineoplastic affect in vase of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Extended intraoperative peritoneal lavage as prophylactic peritoneal recurrence for locally advanced gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: To demonstrate whether extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) could yield better results in overall survival and less recurrence, regardless of peritoneal cytology, compared to standard peritoneal lavage (SPL). METHODS: A prospective randomised multicenter study including 94 patients (47 per arm) to detect a 20% difference in 3-year overall survival in patients with locally advanced tumours without peritoneal carcinomatosis. Three samples of peritoneal fluid were obtained (at the beginning, the end of procedure and after the assigned peritoneal lavage). Clinicopathological and surgical data were analysed by group. Postoperative complications, location of recurrence and surgical approach were evaluated. Overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the uni/multivariate analysis for prognostic factors was carried out using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were analysed (4 excluded per group). No statistical differences were observed in clinicopathological or surgical data between groups, considering both groups well-balanced for analysis. Overall survival at 3 years was 64.3% for SPL vs. 62.3% for EIPL (p 0.421). Only three patients had at least one positive peritoneal cytology (1:2). There were no differences regarding postoperative complications (SPL: 37.2% vs. EIPL: 32.5%, p 0.65) or between location of recurrence and number of recurrences. The number of recurrences did not differ between surgical approaches, but locoregional and peritoneal recurrences were fewer with the laparoscopic approach (p 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The regular use of extensive peritoneal lavage in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, regardless of peritoneal cytology, has not been effective as prophylaxis of peritoneal recurrence or better survival.

Meta-analysis of the effect of peritoneal lavage on survival in experimental peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: : Morbidity and mortality associated with bacterial peritonitis remain a challenge for contemporary surgery. Despite great surgical improvements, death rates have not improved. A secondary debate concerns the volume and nature of peritoneal lavage or washout-what volume, what carrier and what, if any, antibiotic or antiseptic? METHODS: : A literature search of experimental studies assessing the effect of peritoneal lavage following peritonitis was conducted using Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Twenty-three trials met predetermined inclusion criteria. Data were pooled and relative risks calculated. RESULTS: : In an experimental peritonitis setting a mortality rate of 48.9 per cent (238 of 487) was found for saline lavage compared with 16.4 per cent (106 of 647) for antibiotic lavage (absolute risk reduction (ARR) 32.5 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 27.1 to 37.7) per cent; (P < 0.001). An ARR of 25.0 (95 per cent c.i. 17.9 to 31.7) per cent P < 0.001) was found for the use of saline compared with no lavage at all. The survival benefit persisted regardless of systemic antibiotic therapy. Antiseptic lavage was associated with a very high mortality rate (75.0 per cent). CONCLUSION: : Pooled data from studies in experimental peritonitis demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality with antibiotic lavage.

Staged lavage versus single high-volume lavage in the treatment of feculent/purulent peritonitis: a matched pair analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous and iatrogenic secondary peritonitis remain to have a mortality of 10-30% and significant socioeconomic impact in survivors and especially non-survivors. Data on the most cost-effective treatment are lacking. We therefore studied outcome and resource utilization in a homogeneous cohort of patients with secondary fecal or purulent peritonitis undergoing surgery with source control and two different types of abdominal lavage. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with secondary feculent or purulent peritonitis of the lower gastrointestinal tract underwent a single high-volume lavage. That cohort was matched with 31 patients with the same source, extent, and quality of peritonitis treated by source control and staged lavage (intermittent lavage). RESULTS: Patients in both groups were comparable in gender distribution, age, comorbidity, source, extent, and severity of peritonitis with the history of intestinal perforation in the single high-volume lavage group being significantly higher than in the intermittent lavage group (2.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.8d; p = 0.008). Patients in the single high-volume lavage group had significantly less operations, thus requiring significantly less operation time (OR-time), intensive care unit (ICU)-requirement, ventilatory support, and inotropic support. CONCLUSION: Patients with secondary fecal or purulent peritonitis in at least two quadrants, undergoing a one step surgical repair including source control, primary anastomosis, and single high-volume lavage with more than 25 l have a comparable outcome to patients treated by staged lavage at significantly lower OR and ICU-utilization.

Evaluating for acute mesenteric ischemia in critically ill patients: diagnostic peritoneal lavage is associated with reduced operative intervention and mortality.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia among intensive care unit (ICU) patients continues to be difficult and carries high mortality, and yet, it is essential that it be made expeditiously such that lifesaving operative intervention can be offered. A recent study suggested that computed tomography (CT) scan delays operative intervention. Thus, we hypothesized that diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), a rapidly performed bedside procedure of established high sensitivity, is associated with reduced operative intervention, time to operative intervention, and mortality. METHODS: We performed a single-institution, retrospective study of 120 patients admitted to an ICU at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's Presbyterian Hospital between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2010, who were diagnosed with acute mesenteric ischemia. We defined a DPL of greater than 500 cells per cubic millimeter as diagnostic of intra-abdominal pathology. CT scan results were categorized as (1) diagnostic of mesenteric ischemia, (2) abnormal, or (3) normal. We performed multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for difference in case mix, to determine whether DPL is associated with the outcomes of mortality and operative intervention. RESULTS: The cohort was severely ill, with a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 21.7 (range, 0-48), and 51 patients (42.5%) died. The distribution of preoperative evaluation is as follows: CT, 67; DPL, 11; both modalities, 18; and no preoperative evaluation, 24. Those undergoing DPL were more severely ill, as evidenced by significantly higher APACHE II scores. By comparison with CT, DPL was associated with a reduced risk for operation intervention (adjusted odds ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.32; p = 0.002) and mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.62; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: DPL is associated with reduced operative intervention yet improved survival, when compared with patients evaluated with either CT or no diagnostic modality. These data support that, for critically ill ICU patients suspected of harboring intra-abdominal pathology such as acute mesenteric ischemia, DPL should be a mainstay in the preoperative diagnostic evaluation. Further investigation is needed, however, to better define the proper place and timing of DPL in evaluating the acute abdomen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level III; therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

Effects of peritoneal lavage with scolicidal agents on survival and adhesion formation in rats.

Intraoperative irrigation of the peritoneal cavity with scolicidal agents is frequently recommended when dealing with traumatic or spontaneous rupture of hydatid cysts. The present experimental study was designed to examine the influence of various scolicidal agents on adhesion formation and survival. A total of 149 rats were randomly allocated to nine groups. Peritoneal lavage through a median laparotomy was performed with the following scolicidal agents. Group 1 (0.9% saline: controls), group 2 (20% hypertonic saline), group 3 (0.04% chlorhexidine gluconate), group 4 (3% hydrogen peroxide), group 5 (0.5% silver nitrate), group 6 (1% polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine, or PVP-I ), group 7 (5% PVP-I), group 8 (0.5% cetrimide/0.05% chlorhexidine), and group 9 (10% PVP-I). The surviving animals were sacrificed on postoperative day 15. Adhesion formation was macroscopically graded by the Nair criteria. The severity of adhesion formation was evaluated microscopically using the fibrosing scoring criteria and the strain test. Group 9 (10% PVP-I) was excluded from the adhesion evaluation because all of the rats died in this group. The mortality rate was significantly higher in groups 5 and 7 than in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8. Adhesion scores were significantly lower in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 than in groups 5, 6, 7, and 8. The lowest adhesion score was found in group 3 and the highest in the group 7. These results indicate that 0.04% chlorhexidine gluconate, the most potent scolicidal agent in vitro and in vivo, was associated with the lowest adhesion formation and mortality among various scolicidal agents in this experimental study.

Multiple laparotomies for severe intra-abdominal infection.

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates for patients with severe peritoneal infection are high. The present study was undertaken in order to examine mortality rates in patients with severe peritoneal infection who were managed by planned re-laparotomy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients presenting at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre between 1992 and 1994 with severe peritoneal infection was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients underwent either single (n = 30) or multiple (n = 22) peritoneal lavage, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores and predicted mortality rates were calculated for these patients. The predicted mortality rate for patients undergoing a single washout was 42.4%, actual mortality: 23%. The predicted mortality for patients undergoing multiple washouts was 55.6%, actual mortality: 36.3%. No patient with a predicted mortality of < 30% who underwent multiple washouts died. Of nine patients with a predicted mortality between 31 and 60%, one died (11.1%). For a predicted mortality of 61-80%, five of six patients died (83.3%), and for patients with a predicted mortality of > 80%, two of three died (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of planned re-look laparotomy and peritoneal lavage in patients with severe peritonitis may result in a significant decrease in mortality as predicted by APACHE II scoring.

Bedside diagnostic laparoscopy and peritoneal lavage in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and treatment of intra-abdominal pathology in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients remains a clinical challenge. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of portable, bedside diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in the ICU for patients suspected of intra-abdominal pathology, and to contrast its accuracy with diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL). METHODS: All adult ICU patients for whom a general surgery consultation was requested were eligible. Patients with a recent laparotomy or obvious peritonitis were excluded. All procedures were performed in the ICU. RESULTS: Over a consecutive 16-month period, 12 patients underwent DPL/DL. Ages ranged from 28 to 88 (mean, 72) years. Causative findings were disclosed by DL in five patients, (42%) including intestinal ischemia in two. Perforated diverticulitis, thickened terminal ileum, and nonpurulent peritonitis were found in one patient each. All patients with findings by DL had a positive DPL (WBC > 200 cells/mm3), and one negative laparoscopy was positive by lavage. The average length of time to perform DPL was 14 min, and to complete DL 19 min. One patient underwent laparotomy based on DPL/DL and survived along with three others with negative DPL/DL. Eight patients died (67%), four from their surgically untreated intra-abdominal pathology. One patient sustained a procedure-related complication of bradycardia and high ventilatory airway pressures. Peak airway pressures increased an average of 8 mmHg and were significantly higher (p < 0. 001) than pre-DL pressures without any significant change in end-tidal CO2 or pCO2. There were no statistically significant hemodynamic changes based on mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), or pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PADP). CONCLUSIONS: Bedside laparoscopy can be performed rapidly and safely in the ICU. In predicting the need for laparotomy, DL was more accurate than DPL.