ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive and comparable estimates of health spending in each country are a key input for health policy and planning, and are necessary to support the achievement of national and international health goals. Previous studies have tracked past and projected future health spending until 2040 and shown that, with economic development, countries tend to spend more on health per capita, with a decreasing share of spending from development assistance and out-of-pocket sources. We aimed to characterise the past, present, and predicted future of global health spending, with an emphasis on equity in spending across countries. METHODS: We estimated domestic health spending for 195 countries and territories from 1995 to 2016, split into three categories-government, out-of-pocket, and prepaid private health spending-and estimated development assistance for health (DAH) from 1990 to 2018. We estimated future scenarios of health spending using an ensemble of linear mixed-effects models with time series specifications to project domestic health spending from 2017 through 2050 and DAH from 2019 through 2050. Data were extracted from a broad set of sources tracking health spending and revenue, and were standardised and converted to inflation-adjusted 2018 US dollars. Incomplete or low-quality data were modelled and uncertainty was estimated, leading to a complete data series of total, government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending, and DAH. Estimates are reported in 2018 US dollars, 2018 purchasing-power parity-adjusted dollars, and as a percentage of gross domestic product. We used demographic decomposition methods to assess a set of factors associated with changes in government health spending between 1995 and 2016 and to examine evidence to support the theory of the health financing transition. We projected two alternative future scenarios based on higher government health spending to assess the potential ability of governments to generate more resources for health. FINDINGS: Between 1995 and 2016, health spending grew at a rate of 4·00% (95% uncertainty interval 3·89-4·12) annually, although it grew slower in per capita terms (2·72% [2·61-2·84]) and increased by less than $1 per capita over this period in 22 of 195 countries. The highest annual growth rates in per capita health spending were observed in upper-middle-income countries (5·55% [5·18-5·95]), mainly due to growth in government health spending, and in lower-middle-income countries (3·71% [3·10-4·34]), mainly from DAH. Health spending globally reached $8·0 trillion (7·8-8·1) in 2016 (comprising 8·6% [8·4-8·7] of the global economy and $10·3 trillion [10·1-10·6] in purchasing-power parity-adjusted dollars), with a per capita spending of US$5252 (5184-5319) in high-income countries, $491 (461-524) in upper-middle-income countries, $81 (74-89) in lower-middle-income countries, and $40 (38-43) in low-income countries. In 2016, 0·4% (0·3-0·4) of health spending globally was in low-income countries, despite these countries comprising 10·0% of the global population. In 2018, the largest proportion of DAH targeted HIV/AIDS ($9·5 billion, 24·3% of total DAH), although spending on other infectious diseases (excluding tuberculosis and malaria) grew fastest from 2010 to 2018 (6·27% per year). The leading sources of DAH were the USA and private philanthropy (excluding corporate donations and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). For the first time, we included estimates of China's contribution to DAH ($644·7 million in 2018). Globally, health spending is projected to increase to $15·0 trillion (14·0-16·0) by 2050 (reaching 9·4% [7·6-11·3] of the global economy and $21·3 trillion [19·8-23·1] in purchasing-power parity-adjusted dollars), but at a lower growth rate of 1·84% (1·68-2·02) annually, and with continuing disparities in spending between countries. In 2050, we estimate that 0·6% (0·6-0·7) of health spending will occur in currently low-income countries, despite these countries comprising an estimated 15·7% of the global population by 2050. The ratio between per capita health spending in high-income and low-income countries was 130·2 (122·9-136·9) in 2016 and is projected to remain at similar levels in 2050 (125·9 [113·7-138·1]). The decomposition analysis identified governments' increased prioritisation of the health sector and economic development as the strongest factors associated with increases in government health spending globally. Future government health spending scenarios suggest that, with greater prioritisation of the health sector and increased government spending, health spending per capita could more than double, with greater impacts in countries that currently have the lowest levels of government health spending. INTERPRETATION: Financing for global health has increased steadily over the past two decades and is projected to continue increasing in the future, although at a slower pace of growth and with persistent disparities in per-capita health spending between countries. Out-of-pocket spending is projected to remain substantial outside of high-income countries. Many low-income countries are expected to remain dependent on development assistance, although with greater government spending, larger investments in health are feasible. In the absence of sustained new investments in health, increasing efficiency in health spending is essential to meet global health targets. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Subject(s)
Global Health/economics , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Global Health/trends , Gross Domestic Product , Health Expenditures/trends , Healthcare Financing , Humans , Models, Economic , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Prepaid Health Plans/trends , Public Assistance/statistics & numerical data , Public Assistance/trendsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The research community relies heavily on measures of healthcare utilization from household surveys to understand health seeking choices and to evaluate interventions in developing countries. Such measures are known to suffer from recall problems but there is limited evidence of whether the method of data collection affects evaluation findings. We compared the results of a randomized trial of free healthcare using utilization data from two sources. METHODS: Data are from a study in Ghana, in which 2,194 households containing 2,592 children under 5 y old were randomized into a prepayment scheme providing free primary and some referral care, or to a control group whose families paid user fees for healthcare. Data on morbidity and health seeking behaviour were collected using a standard household survey administered at endline and a pictorial diary given to households over a six month period, collected at monthly intervals. RESULTS: Self-reported measures of morbidity and healthcare utilization were substantially lower in the household survey than the pictorial diary when the recall period was over a month. Introducing free healthcare had a positive effect on primary care visits based on the pictorial diary and a non-significant negative effect according to the household survey. Using any clinic visit in the past month as the outcome, the difference in the effect of free care between the two data collection methods was 3.6 percentage points (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: The findings raise methodological concerns about measures of healthcare utilization from household surveys, particularly in the evaluation of health financing interventions.
Subject(s)
Family Characteristics , Fees and Charges , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Prepaid Health Plans/economics , Adult , Benchmarking , Child, Preschool , Developing Countries , Female , Ghana , Health Care Costs , Health Surveys , Humans , Malaria/diagnosis , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria/economics , Male , Medical Records , Parasitemia/diagnosis , Parasitemia/economics , Parasitemia/therapy , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Population-based data on the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with multiple unrelated drug class intolerances noted in their medical records are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To provide population-based drug "allergy" incidence rates and prevalence, and to identify individuals with multiple drug intolerance syndrome (MDIS) defined by 3 or more unrelated drug class "allergies," and to provide demographic and clinical information on MDIS cases. METHODS: Electronic medical record data from 2,375,424 Kaiser Permanente Southern California health plan members who had a health care visit and at least 11 months of health care coverage during 2009 were reviewed. Population-based drug "allergy" incidence rates and prevalence were determined for 23 unrelated medication classes. RESULTS: On January 1, 2009, 478,283 (20.1%) health plan members had at least one reported "allergy." Individuals with a history of at least 1 "allergy" and females, in general, reported higher population-based new "allergy" incidence rates. Multiple drug intolerance syndrome was present in 49,582 (2.1%). The MDIS cases were significantly older, 62.4 ± 16.1 years; heavier, body mass index 29.3 ± 7.1; and likely to be female, 84.9%, compared with average health plan members. They had high rates of health care utilization, medication usage, and new drug "allergy" incidence. They sought medical attention for common nonmorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple drug intolerance syndrome is in part iatrogenic. It is associated with overweight elderly women who have high rates of health care and medication usage. Urticarial syndromes only explain a small fraction of MDIS cases. Multiple drug intolerance syndrome is associated with anxiety, but not predominately with immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy or life-threatening illness. Multiple drug intolerance syndrome can be managed by medication avoidance and judicious rechallenge.
Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/classification , California/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Electronic Health Records , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Narcotics/adverse effects , Narcotics/classification , Penicillins/adverse effects , Penicillins/classification , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , SyndromeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze publications regarding judicial demands related to the violation of the rights of the client who uses private health insurance in Brazil. METHOD: Integrative review, from September to October 2017, of national character, with complete texts online, in Portuguese and English, published between 2012 and 2017 in the Virtual Health Library portal, excluding studies that were duplicated or with indiscriminate methodology. RESULTS: The judicial demands were for: medication (32%); ward hospitalization (11%); surgical procedures (9%); orthosis, prothesis and special materials (9%); others (9%); and diagnostic procedures, outpatient service, hospitalization in Intensive Care Units, food formulas and disposable diapers (30%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of legal disputes arising from the failure in providing health service by private health insurances was observed, which makes it easier for the administrators to identify the sought health products and services in order to reorganize the administrative sphere and provide quality care.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/economics , Judicial Role/history , Prepaid Health Plans/legislation & jurisprudence , Brazil , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility , History, 21st Century , Humans , Prepaid Health Plans/standards , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Delays in accessing care for malaria and other diseases can lead to disease progression, and user fees are a known barrier to accessing health care. Governments are introducing free health care to improve health outcomes. Free health care affects treatment seeking, and it is therefore assumed to lead to improved health outcomes, but there is no direct trial evidence of the impact of removing out-of-pocket payments on health outcomes in developing countries. This trial was designed to test the impact of free health care on health outcomes directly. METHODS AND FINDINGS: 2,194 households containing 2,592 Ghanaian children under 5 y old were randomised into a prepayment scheme allowing free primary care including drugs, or to a control group whose families paid user fees for health care (normal practice); 165 children whose families had previously paid to enrol in the prepayment scheme formed an observational arm. The primary outcome was moderate anaemia (haemoglobin [Hb] < 8 g/dl); major secondary outcomes were health care utilisation, severe anaemia, and mortality. At baseline the randomised groups were similar. Introducing free primary health care altered the health care seeking behaviour of households; those randomised to the intervention arm used formal health care more and nonformal care less than the control group. Introducing free primary health care did not lead to any measurable difference in any health outcome. The primary outcome of moderate anaemia was detected in 37 (3.1%) children in the control and 36 children (3.2%) in the intervention arm (adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.67). There were four deaths in the control and five in the intervention group. Mean Hb concentration, severe anaemia, parasite prevalence, and anthropometric measurements were similar in each group. Families who previously self-enrolled in the prepayment scheme were significantly less poor, had better health measures, and used services more frequently than those in the randomised group. CONCLUSIONS: In the study setting, removing out-of-pocket payments for health care had an impact on health care-seeking behaviour but not on the health outcomes measured.
Subject(s)
Fees and Charges , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Malaria/drug therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prepaid Health Plans , Anemia/drug therapy , Anemia/epidemiology , Anemia/etiology , Child, Preschool , Ghana/epidemiology , Health Care Costs , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Malaria/diagnosis , Malaria/mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Parasitemia/epidemiology , Prepaid Health Plans/economics , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to analyze the use of dental services by children in Sobral, Ceará State, Brazil, relating such use to socioeconomic factors and patterns of service consumption. An analytical cross-sectional study was performed, interviewing parents or guardians of 3,425 children. The relationship between independent variables and use of dental services was analyzed using tests of association (chi-squared), odds ratios (OR) and respective confidence intervals, and multiple logistic regression. 50.9% of children had used dental services at least once in their lives. Of these, 65.3% had used such services in the previous year and 85.4% in public dental services. The importance of the Brazilian Unified National Health System is highlighted by the response in terms of access to dental services, considering that the vast majority of treatment was provided by this public system. The factors that most affected use of dental services were socioeconomic status, health plan coverage, owning a toothbrush, regular garbage collection, maternal knowledge, sewage treatment, and malnutrition.
Subject(s)
Dental Care for Children/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Child , Child, Preschool , Epidemiologic Methods , Humans , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Public Sector/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Toothbrushing/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess health coverage of elderly people receiving supplementary health care and these users' sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: Descriptive study of elderly population living in Brazil and in the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro in 2006. Data was collected from the National Supplementary Care Beneficiary Information System and the National Household Sample Survey. The following variables were studied: gender, age, distribution by federal unit, category of health insurance, type of contract and plan segmentation. RESULTS: Higher coverage of the general population was seen in the age groups 70-79 years (26.7% and 80 years and more (30.2%). Of those aged 80 years and more, 33% had private health plans among women and 25.9% among men. Nearly 80% of health insurance beneficiaries were living in southeastern and southern Brazil, of which 55% were in Rio-São Paulo axis. Health maintenance organizations covered a higher proportion of younger compared to elderly population (39% and 34.5%, respectively) and self-management care plans covered a significantly higher proportion of elderly compared to younger population in Brazil (22.8% and 13.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly health care coverage was significantly high and age groups over 70 years showed the highest coverage rates among the Brazilian population, especially among women.
Subject(s)
Health Services for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brazil , Child , Child, Preschool , Demography , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
This study analyzed indicators for health behaviors and use of preventive services in two probabilistic samples of adults, one in 2003 (n = 13,757) and the other in 2010 (n = 12,983), with and without private health insurance in Greater Metropolitan Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. After adjusting for demographic variables, temporal variation, and source of care, there was a reduction in smoking prevalence, similar between individuals with and without private health insurance, from 2003 to 2010. During this same period the prevalence of excessive alcohol intake and sedentary lifestyle increased in both groups; with the same magnitude, there was a decrease in the prevalence of leisure-time physical activity. No changes were observed in the prevalence of blood pressure measurement, but the prevalence of cholesterol testing, mammogram, and Pap smear increased more sharply in individuals without health insurance.
Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Brazil , Female , Humans , Insurance, Health , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban PopulationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the association of multimorbidity, primary health care model and possession of a private health plan with hospitalization. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study with 1,593 elderly individuals (60 years old or older) living in the urban area of the city of Bagé, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The outcome was hospitalization in the year preceding the interview. The multimorbidity was evaluated through two cut-off points (≥ 2 and ≥ 3). The primary health care model was defined by residence in areas covered by traditional care or by Family Health Strategy. The older adults mentioned the possession of a private health plan. We performed a gross and adjusted analysis by Poisson regression using a hierarchical model. The adjustment included demographic, socioeconomic, functional capacity disability and health services variables. RESULTS: The occurrence of overall and non-surgical hospitalization was 17.7% (95%CI 15.8-19.6) and 10.6% (95%CI 9.1-12.1), respectively. Older adults with multimorbidity were admitted to hospitals more often when to older adults without multimorbidity, regardless of the exhibition' form of operation. Having a private health plan increased the hospitalization by 1.71 (95%CI 1.09-2.69) times among residents in the areas of the Family Health Strategy when compared to elderly residents in traditional areas without a private health plan. CONCLUSIONS: The multimorbidity increased the occurrence of hospitalizations, especially non-surgical ones. Hospitalization was more frequent in older adults with private health plan and those living in Family Health Strategy areas, regardless of the presence of multiple diseases. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a associação da multimorbidade, modelo de atenção básica e posse de plano de saúde com hospitalização. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal de base populacional com 1.593 idosos (60 anos ou mais) residentes na zona urbana do município de Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul. O desfecho foi a hospitalização no ano anterior à entrevista. A multimorbidade foi avaliada por meio de dois pontos de corte (≥ 2 e ≥ 3). O modelo de atenção básica foi definido pela residência em áreas cobertas pela atenção tradicional ou da Estratégia Saúde da Família. A posse de plano de saúde foi referida pelos idosos. Realizou-se análise bruta e ajustada por regressão de Poisson utilizando modelo hierarquizado. O ajuste incluiu variáveis demográficas, socioeconômicas, capacidades funcionais e de serviços de saúde. RESULTADOS: A ocorrência de hospitalização geral e não cirúrgica foi de 17,7% (IC95% 15,8-19,6) e 10,6% (IC95% 9,1-12,1), respectivamente. Idosos com multimorbidade hospitalizaram mais em comparação com os idosos sem multimorbidade, independentemente da forma de operacionalização da exposição. O plano de saúde aumentou em 1,71 (IC95% 1,09-2,69) vezes a internação hospitalar entre residentes nas áreas da Estratégia Saúde da Família em comparação aos idosos residentes nas áreas tradicionais sem plano de saúde. CONCLUSÕES: A multimorbidade aumentou a ocorrência de hospitalizações, principalmente aquelas não cirúrgicas. Idosos com plano de saúde e residentes em áreas de Estratégia Saúde da Família internaram mais, independentemente da presença de múltiplas doenças.
Subject(s)
Comorbidity , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/standards , Aged , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban PopulationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In March 2004 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned physicians and patients regarding increased risk of suicide with 10 newer antidepressant drugs. Available data leave considerable uncertainty regarding actual risk of suicide attempt and death by suicide during antidepressant treatment. The authors used population-based data to evaluate the risk of suicide death and serious suicide attempt in relation to initiation of antidepressant treatment. METHOD: Computerized health plan records were used to identify 65,103 patients with 82,285 episodes of antidepressant treatment between Jan. 1, 1992, and June 30, 2003. Death by suicide was identified by using state and national death certificate data. Serious suicide attempt (suicide attempt leading to hospitalization) was identified by using hospital discharge data. RESULTS: In the 6 months after the index prescription of antidepressant treatment, 31 suicide deaths (40 per 100,000 treatment episodes) and 76 serious suicide attempts (93 per 100,000) were identified in the study group. The risk of suicide attempt was 314 per 100,000 in children and adolescents, compared to 78 per 100,000 in adults. The risk of death by suicide was not significantly higher in the month after starting medication than in subsequent months. The risk of suicide attempt was highest in the month before starting antidepressant treatment and declined progressively after starting medication. When the 10 newer antidepressants included in the FDA advisory were compared to older drugs, an increase in risk after starting treatment was seen only for the older drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of suicide during acute-phase antidepressant treatment is approximately one in 3,000 treatment episodes, and risk of serious suicide attempt is approximately one in 1,000. Available data do not indicate a significant increase in risk of suicide or serious suicide attempt after starting treatment with newer antidepressant drugs.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cause of Death , Death Certificates , Depressive Disorder/mortality , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate, within a private health insurance, the ordering frequency and the costs related to inappropriate tumor markers test orders. METHODS: This study analyzed data regarding tumor markers requests within a private health insurance between 2010 and 2017. Patients included in this analysis were ≥ 50 years old, had available medical records, and had at least 1 tumor markers tested within the study period. Tests were considered inappropriate when tumor markers were used in screening for neoplasms, ie, when there was no previous diagnosis. We evaluated data regarding age, sex, the ordering physician's medical specialty, and test costs. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, 1112 tumor markers tests were performed and increased from 52 to 262 per year. Our sample consisted mostly of women (69.50%) with a mean age of 59.40 (SD 8.20) years. Most orders were inappropriate (87.80%) and represented 79.40% of all expenses with tumor markers tests. Cardiology professionals were the medical specialty that requested the most tumor markers tests (23.90%), followed by internal medicine specialists (22.70%) and gynecologists (19.20%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high percentage of inappropriate test orders in the study period, resulting in elevated costs. Studies of this nature deserve the attention of health care managers, and interventions should be performed in order to reduce the inappropriate use of tumor markers tests in clinical practice.
OBJETIVO: investigar no âmbito de um plano de saúde privado a frequência de solicitação e os custos relacionados à solicitação inapropriada de marcadores tumorais. METODOLOGIA: Utilizou-se a base de dados de um plano de saúde privado entre os anos de 2010 a 2017. Foram incluídos na pesquisa, sujeitos com idade ≥ 50 anos, que apresentavam prontuários médicos acessíveis e que havia realizado a dosagem de algum marcadores tumorais no período. Considerou-se como "exame inapropriado" quando o marcador tumoral foi utilizado como rastreio de neoplasia, ou seja, quando não havia o diagnóstico prévio. Foram avaliados os dados referentes à idade, sexo, especialidade do médico solicitante e informações sobre os custos desses exames. RESULTADOS: Foram realizados um total 1.112 testes no período, representando um aumento de 52 para 262 exames/ano. A amostra foi composta na maioria pelo sexo feminino (69,50%), com média de idade de 59,40 ± 8,20 anos. A maioria das solicitações foram inapropriadas (87,80%). Notou-se que a solicitação desses exames, impactaram cerca de 79,40% dos gastos totais do plano de saúde com marcadores tumorais. Os cardiologistas foram a especialidade que mais solicitaram marcadores tumorais em 23,90% das ocasiões, seguidos pelos especialistas em clínica médica (22,70%) e ginecologistas (19,20%). CONCLUSÕES: Observamos um alto percentual de pedidos de exames inadequados no período do estudo, resultando em custos elevados. Estudos dessa natureza merecem a atenção dos gestores de saúde e intervenções devem ser realizadas a fim de reduzir o uso inadequado de testes de marcador tumoral na prática clínica.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/economics , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Unnecessary Procedures/economics , Costs and Cost AnalysisABSTRACT
Hospital readmissions are common and expensive, and there is little information on the problem in Colombia. The objective was to determine the frequency of 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions and associated factors. This was a retrospective analytical cohort study of 64,969 hospitalizations from January 2008 to January 2009 in 47 Colombian cities. 6,573 hospital readmissions, prevalence: 10.1% (men 10.9%, women 9.5%), 44.7% > 65 years of age. Hospital readmissions was associated with higher mortality (5.8% vs. 1.8%). There was an increase in the Hospital readmissions rate in patients with diseases of the circulatory system. Hospital readmissions was more likely in hematological diseases and neoplasms. Mean length of stay during the first readmission was 7 days in patients that were readmitted and 4.5 in those without readmission. Greater total cost of hospital readmissions (USA 21,998,275): 15.8% of the total cost of hospitalizations. Higher prevalence rates in referred patients (18.8%) and patients from the outpatient clinic (13.7%). Hospital readmissions is common and is associated with longer length of hospital stay and higher mortality and cost. Increased risk of hospital readmissions in men > 65 years, patients referred from other institutions, and in hematological diseases and neoplasms.
Subject(s)
Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Child , Child, Preschool , Colombia , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Readmission/economics , Prepaid Health Plans/economics , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a high degree of professional consensus that children diagnosed with pharyngitis should only receive antibiotics if they have a positive test for group A streptococcus (GAS). OBJECTIVES: To develop and test the validity of a quality of care performance measure that examines GAS testing rates in children diagnosed with pharyngitis and prescribed an antibiotic. DESIGN: The measure developed examines the annual rate of GAS testing in children aged 2 to 18 years with an episode of pharyngitis who were prescribed antibiotics. The measure was tested for feasibility of implementation and validity in 5 health plans in the United States. Health plan administrative data were used to identify episodes of pharyngitis using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 462, 463, and 034.0. Pharmacy data (National Drug Codes) were used to determine if antibiotics were prescribed for the pharyngitis episode. Laboratory claims data (Current Procedural Terminology codes) were used to determine whether a GAS test was performed. Rates of GAS testing in children with pharyngitis who received antibiotics were calculated for each health plan. Medical record abstractions were performed on a random sample (n = 465) of cases to assess percent agreement with laboratory claims data for GAS testing. Sensitivity of the administrative data for accurately identifying when GAS tests were performed was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 120 158 children aged 2 to 18 years who had at least 1 episode of pharyngitis during the measurement year, 51 172 (43%) received antibiotics. Group A streptococcal testing rates for patients who were prescribed antibiotics varied widely among the participating health plans (59%-83% of cases; P<.05). Percent agreement between administrative and medical records data for GAS tests was 86%. The sensitivity of the administrative data for accurately identifying when GAS tests were performed was 85%. CONCLUSIONS: This quality measure is feasible to implement at the health plan level and validly assesses GAS testing rates using administrative data. The participating health plans are not performing GAS tests as indicated by current expert practice guidelines in a substantial proportion of cases. Improvements in adhering to these guidelines are warranted given the current levels of antibiotic overuse and antibiotic resistance nationally.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Quality of Health Care , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Medical Records , Pharyngitis/microbiology , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Streptococcus pyogenes/pathogenicity , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate self-reported use of cancer screening tests by Latino and Anglo prepaid health plan members, we conducted telephone interviews about the knowledge of, use of, and reason for Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, clinical breast examination, mammogram, rectal examination, fecal occult blood test, and sigmoidoscopy. METHODS: Cross-sectional telephone survey of randomly selected Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program members in San Francisco and Alameda Counties, California. A total of 844 Latinos (432 men and 412 women) and 510 Anglos (208 men and 302 women), between 35 and 74 years of age, completed the interview. RESULTS: Overall, 97.4% of Latinas reported having had at least one Pap smear compared with 99.7% of Anglo women; 90% in each group reported a Pap smear within 3 years. A clinical breast examination within 2 years was reported by 87% of Latina and 90% of Anglo women. Seventy-six percent of Latina and 85% of Anglo women aged 35 years or more reported having had at least one mammogram; and 65% of Latina and 75% of Anglo women reported a mammogram within 2 years. Among members 40 to 74 years of age, a lower proportion of Latinos compared with Anglos reported having had at least one digital rectal examination (67% vs 80%) and one fecal occult blood test (46% vs 54%); among those 50 to 74 years of age, fewer Latinos reported at least one sigmoidoscopy (29% vs 41%). After adjusting for age, education, employment, perceived health status, marital status, and county of residence, Latinos were significantly less likely to report having had at least one digital rectal examination (odds ratio; 0.60, 95% confidence interval, 0.45, 0.79), fecal occult blood test (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.01), and sigmoidoscopy (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.52, 0.95). After adjusting for the same variables, Latinos were more likely than Anglos to claim forgetfulness/carelessness (75% vs 60%; odds ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.40) as a reason for not obtaining cancer screening tests. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that, within this prepaid health plan without direct financial barriers to cancer screening services, Latinos are less likely than Anglos to obtain selected recommended cancer screening tests.
Subject(s)
Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , California , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Occult Blood , Palpation/statistics & numerical data , Papanicolaou Test , Sigmoidoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Telephone , Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Although states have had difficulty extending Medicaid managed care (MMC) to rural areas, rural models of capitated MMC are expected to grow in response to new federal regulations and the serious budget problems facing nearly all states. As such, understanding the effects of capitated MMC in rural settings is important for policy considerations. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of capitated MMC on beneficiary access and use in rural Minnesota. METHODS: We took advantage of delays in the timing of the introduction of MMC across rural counties in Minnesota to estimate the effects of managed care on adults and children under Medicaid using a difference-in-differences framework. FINDINGS: We found that Minnesota's shift from fee-for-service Medicaid to MMC in its rural counties had little effect on access to health care for either adults or children. CONCLUSIONS: Because Minnesota reports that Medicaid costs under MMC are below expected costs under FFS Medicaid, it appears that the primary accomplishment of Minnesota's rural MMC initiative is one of cost savings: MMC provides the same access to care as FFS Medicaid, but at lower cost. With steep budget deficits in nearly all states, other states may want to consider Minnesota's rural MMC model as a mechanism for reducing their Medicaid costs.
Subject(s)
Capitation Fee , Fee-for-Service Plans/statistics & numerical data , Managed Care Programs/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/organization & administration , Rural Health Services/economics , State Health Plans/organization & administration , Adult , Capitation Fee/statistics & numerical data , Child , Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Female , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Managed Care Programs/economics , Medicaid/economics , Minnesota , Prepaid Health Plans/economics , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health , State Health Plans/economics , Time Factors , United StatesABSTRACT
This study analyzes data from the World Health Survey (WHS) conducted in 2003, with a sample of 5,000 individuals 18 years and older. Some 24.0% of the interviewees had private health insurance, and the main variables associated with private coverage were number of household assets, age, level of education, formal employment, living in municipalities with more than 50,000 inhabitants, and good self-rated health. The socioeconomic profiles of needs for and use of health services in the population covered by private health plans are different, confirming the findings of other studies reporting that this population segment as a whole presents better health conditions and greater use of services as compared to the population without private coverage, even after adjusting for socio-demographic variables and self-rated health. The WHS data also suggest that individuals with private health plans do not always use their insurance to pay for services, except in the case of mammograms.
Subject(s)
Health Care Surveys , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Female , Global Health , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Objetivo: analisar a frequência e fatores associados à cobertura por planos privados de saúde na região metropolitana de Manaus, AM, Brasil. Métodos: estudo transversal de base populacional realizado em 2015, por meio de entrevista domiciliar; as razões de prevalência (RP) e intervalos de confiança (IC95%) foram calculadas pela regressão de Poisson, com variância robusta ajustada por sexo e faixa etária. Resultados: foram entrevistados 4.001 indivíduos, dos quais 13% (IC95% 12,0 a 14,1%) tinham plano de saúde; maior cobertura por planos foi observada entre militares (RP=3,18 - IC95% 1,64;6,15), empregados dos setores privado (RP=1,91 - IC95% 1,46;2,52) e público (RP=1,75 - IC95% 1,23;2,49); a cobertura por planos de saúde foi menor entre pessoas mais pobres (RP=0,21 - IC95% 0,13;0,33) e de menor escolaridade (RP=0,66 - IC95% 0,46;0,99). Conclusão: a frequência de planos de saúde foi baixa e associou-se a melhor poder aquisitivo, escolaridade e situação de trabalho.
Objetivo: analizar la frecuencia y los factores asociados a la cobertura por planes de salud en la región metropolitana de Manaus, AM, Brasil. Métodos: estudio transversal de base poblacional por entrevista domiciliar. Las razones de prevalencia (RP) e intervalo de confianza (IC95%) fueron calculadas por regresión de Poisson con varianza robusta, ajustadas por sexo y edad. Resultados: se entrevistaron 4.001 individuos; 13% (IC95%: 12,0 a 14,1%) tenían plan de salud; la mayor cobertura por planes fue observada entre militares (RP=3,18 - IC95% 1,64;6,15), empleados del sector privado (RP=1,91 - IC95% 1,46;2,52) y del sector público (RP=1,75 - IC95% 1,23;2,49); la cobertura fue menor en personas más pobres (RP=0,21 - IC95% 0,13;0,33) y de menor escolaridad (RP=0,66 - IC95% 0,46;0,99). Conclusión: la frecuencia de planes de salud fue baja y se asoció con mejor poder adquisitivo, escolaridad y situación de trabajo.
Objective: to analyze the frequency and factors associated with coverage by health insurance in the metropolitan region of Manaus, AM, Brazil. Method: a cross-sectional population-based study was conducted in 2015, with data collected through household interviews; prevalence ratios (PR) and confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using Poisson regression with robust variance adjusted for sex and age. Results: we interviewed 4,001 individuals; 13% (95%CI - 12.0;14.1%) had health insurance; greater insurance coverage was observed among military personnel (PR=3.18 - 95%CI 1.64;6.15), private sector employees (PR=1.91 - 95%CI 1.46;2.52) and public sector employees (PR=1.75 - 95%CI 1.23;2.49); health insurance was lower among poorer people (PR=0.21 - 95%CI 0.13;0.33), and those with less schooling (PR=0.66 - 95%CI 0.46;0.99). Conclusion: frequency of health insurance was low and was associated with better purchasing power, schooling, and employment.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Quality of Health Care , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Brazil , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
Key Data Findings. (1) Reclassification of rural and urban county designations (due to the switch from 2000 census data to 2010 census data) resulted in a 10 percent decline in the number of Medicare eligible Americans living in rural counties in 2014 (from roughly 10.7 million to 9.6 million). These changes also resulted in a decline in the number of MA enrollees considered to be living in a rural area, from 2.19 million to 1.95 million. However, the percentage of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in MA and prepaid plans in rural areas declined only slightly from 20.6 percent to 20.3 percent. (2) Rural Medicare Advantage (MA) and other prepaid plan enrollment in March 2014 was nearly 1.95 million, or 20.3 percent of all rural Medicare beneficiaries, an increase of more than 216,000 from March 2013. Enrollment increased to 1.99 million (20.4 percent) in October 2014. (3) In March 2014, 56 percent of rural MA enrollees were enrolled in Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) plans, 29 percent were enrolled in Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) or Point-of-Service (POS) plans, 7 percent were enrolled in Private Fee-for-Service (PFFS) plans, and 8 percent were enrolled in other prepaid plans, including Cost plans and Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) plans. (4) States with the highest percentage of rural Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in MA and other prepaid plans include Minnesota (49.1 percent), Hawaii (41.1 percent), Pennsylvania (35.4 percent), Wisconsin (34.3 percent), New York (30.4 percent), and Ohio (30.1 percent).
Subject(s)
Medicare Part C/statistics & numerical data , Medicare Part C/trends , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/trends , Eligibility Determination , Fee-for-Service Plans/statistics & numerical data , Forecasting , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Preferred Provider Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population , United StatesABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze publications regarding judicial demands related to the violation of the rights of the client who uses private health insurance in Brazil. Method: Integrative review, from September to October 2017, of national character, with complete texts online, in Portuguese and English, published between 2012 and 2017 in the Virtual Health Library portal, excluding studies that were duplicated or with indiscriminate methodology. Results: The judicial demands were for: medication (32%); ward hospitalization (11%); surgical procedures (9%); orthosis, prothesis and special materials (9%); others (9%); and diagnostic procedures, outpatient service, hospitalization in Intensive Care Units, food formulas and disposable diapers (30%). Conclusion: The prevalence of legal disputes arising from the failure in providing health service by private health insurances was observed, which makes it easier for the administrators to identify the sought health products and services in order to reorganize the administrative sphere and provide quality care.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar las publicaciones acerca de las demandas judiciales relacionadas con la infracción a los derechos del usuario que utiliza un plan privado de salud en Brasil. Método: Revisión integrativa realizada entre septiembre y octubre de 2017, en ámbito nacional en los idiomas portugués e inglés, con textos completos y publicados en línea de 2012 a 2017 en el Portal de la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud, con la exclusión de los duplicados y de metodología indiscriminada. Resultados: Las demandas judiciales fueron: un 32% por medicamentos; un 11% por internación en enfermería; un 9% por procedimientos quirúrgicos; un 9% por ortesis, prótesis y materiales especiales; un 9% por otros; y un 30% por procedimientos diagnósticos, de atención ambulatoria, de internación en un Centro de Terapia Intensiva, de fórmulas alimentarias y pañales desechables. Conclusión: Se demostró una prevalencia de los litigios judiciales resultantes de una falla en la prestación del servicio de salud por los planes privados, lo que les facilita a los gestores identificar los productos y servicios de salud necesarios para reorganizar la esfera administrativa y la prestación de una asistencia con calidad.
RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar as publicações a respeito de demandas judiciais relacionadas à infração aos direitos do usuário que utiliza plano privado de saúde no Brasil. Método: Revisão integrativa de setembro a outubro de 2017, com caráter nacional em português e inglês, textos online completos e publicados entre 2012 e 2017 no Portal da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, excluindo os duplicados e com metodologia indiscriminada. Resultados: As demandas judiciais foram: 32% medicamentos; 11% internação em enfermaria; 9% procedimentos cirúrgicos; 9% órtese, prótese e materiais especiais; 9% outros; e 30% de procedimentos diagnósticos, atendimento ambulatorial, internação em Centro de Terapia Intensiva, fórmulas alimentares e fraldas descartáveis. Conclusão: Demonstra-se a prevalência dos litígios judiciais decorrentes da falha na prestação do serviço de saúde pelos planos privados, o que facilita aos gestores identificar produtos e serviços de saúde pleiteados para reorganização da esfera administrativa e prestação de assistência com qualidade.
Subject(s)
History, 21st Century , Humans , Prepaid Health Plans/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Judicial Role/history , Brazil , Prepaid Health Plans/standards , Prepaid Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Services AccessibilityABSTRACT
This paper is a report of the results of a demonstration designed to provide empirical evidence regarding the effects of alternative approaches to paying physicians for serving children in the Medicaid program: (1) visit fees set at twice regular Medicaid fees in return for physician agreement to manage utilization and (2) capitation and financial risk-sharing along with the same physician agreement to manage utilization. Participating physicians were assigned randomly to either of the two payment groups. Comparisons of utilization and expenditures were made between these two plans and the regular Medicaid program (fee-for-service, low fees). Results showed no adverse effect of capitation payments on primary care visits to office-based physicians. Capitation physician referrals to specialists decreased relative to all other groups studied, consistent with the theory that the financial incentives in capitation will lead primary care physicians to reduce referrals to specialists.