Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 927
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Radiol Prot ; 40(3): 835-847, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32570230

ABSTRACT

Experience has demonstrated lack of preparedness at national levels to manage the consequences of a nuclear or radiological emergency in its later phase which, on occasions, resulted in unjustified actions. To assist Member States preparing for this phase, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published guidance (IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-11) recommending, inter alia, for operational intervention levels (OILT) to be developed for enabling the transition from an emergency exposure situation to an existing exposure situation. OILT are intended to also support decisions be made on lifting or adapting public protective actions imposed early in the emergency response and on actions to be taken to further reduce exposures. Using the methodology provided therein, OILT have been calculated for radiological emergencies involving release of the most commonly used alpha, beta and gamma emitting radionuclides in the environment. In addition, an approach for deriving a default OILT value has been presented and a default OILT value for the ambient dose equivalent rate at 1 m above ground level has been derived. The derived OILT values support the application of relevant IAEA safety standards (i.e. No. GSR Part 7 and No. GSG-11) as well as relevant recommendations of the Council Directive 2013/59 in relation to the transition from the emergency exposure situation to an existing exposure situation at national levels. However, they need to be integrated within the national protection strategies to guide the implementation of activities and actions that support the resumption of normal social and economic activity after the emergency which include those concerning return of members of the public, who were resettled during the implementation of evacuation or relocation, to their homes.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning/standards , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioactive Hazard Release , Humans , International Agencies , Risk Assessment
2.
J Radiol Prot ; 39(3): 698-706, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30965291

ABSTRACT

In their most recent recommendations, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) proposed the use of a set of updated tissue and radiation weighting factors for the calculation of the effective dose. This recommendation was adopted in the European Union by the directive 2013/59/EURATOM in 2013 and implemented in the corresponding radiation protection regulations in Germany in 2018. In this study, we investigate the impact of the new weighting factors according to ICRP 103 on the dose rates of the effective dose due to the exposure of aircrew to cosmic radiation with the PANDOCA model for the description of the complex radiation field in the atmosphere. The application of the updated weighting factors leads to a reduction in the rate of the effective dose in the order of 20% to 30% depending on atmospheric and geomagnetic shielding as well as solar modulation.


Subject(s)
Aircraft , Cosmic Radiation , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Humans , International Agencies , Radiation Protection/methods , Risk Factors
3.
J Radiol Prot ; 39(3): R19-R36, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31189142

ABSTRACT

Over the past decades, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has used radiation detriment, which is a multidimensional concept to quantify the overall harm to health from stochastic effects of low-level radiation exposure of different parts of the body. Each tissue-specific detriment is determined from the nominal tissue-specific risk coefficient, weighted by the severity of the disease in terms of lethality, impact on quality of life and years of life lost. Total detriment is the sum of the detriments for separate tissues and organs. Tissue weighting factors for the calculation of effective dose are based on relative contributions of each tissue to the total detriment. Calculating radiation detriment is a complex process that requires information from various sources and judgements on how to achieve calculations. As such, it is important to document its calculation methodology. To improve the traceability of calculations and form a solid basis for future recommendations, the ICRP Task Group 102 on detriment calculation methodology was established in 2016. As part of its mission, the history of radiation detriment was reviewed, and the process of detriment calculation was detailed. This article summarises that work, aiming to clarify the methodology of detriment calculation currently used by ICRP.


Subject(s)
Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/standards , Advisory Committees , Humans , Internationality , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Risk Assessment
4.
J Radiol Prot ; 39(1): 126-135, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30523929

ABSTRACT

Following the proposal of the ICRP for the reduction of the dose limit for the lens of the eye, which has been adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the European Council, concerns have been raised about the implementation of proper dose monitoring methods as defined in national regulations, and about the harmonisation between European countries. The European Radiation Dosimetry Group organised a survey at the end of 2017, through a web questionnaire, regarding national dose monitoring regulations. The questions were related to: double dosimetry, algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose, methodology for the determination of the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye and structure of the national dose registry. The results showed that more than 50% of the countries that responded to the survey have legal requirements about the number and the position of dosemeters used for estimation of the effective dose when radiation protection garments are used. However, in only five out of 26 countries are there nationally approved algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose. In 14 out of 26 countries there is a legal requirement to estimate the dose to the lens of the eye. All of the responding countries use some kind of national database for storing individual monitoring data but in only 12 out of 26 countries are the estimated effective dose values stored. The personal dose equivalent at depth 3 mm is stored in the registry of only seven out of 26 countries. From the survey, performed just before the implementation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive, it is concluded that national occupational exposure frameworks require intensive and immediate work under the coordination of the competent authorities to bring them into line with the latest basic safety standards and achieve harmonisation between European countries.


Subject(s)
Protective Clothing/standards , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/standards , Europe , Humans , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/standards , Radiation Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Radiol Prot ; 38(2): 854-867, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29657155

ABSTRACT

The article critically examines the practice of post-Chernobyl standardisation of radionuclide concentrations (mainly 137Cs and 90Sr) in food products (FPs) in the USSR and the successor countries of Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. Recommendations are given on potential harmonisation of these standards of radionuclide concentrations in FPs among the three countries, taking into account substantial international experience. We propose to reduce the number of product groups for standardisation purposes from the current amount of several dozens to three to five groups to optimise radiation control and increase the transparency of the process. We recommend five product groups for the standardisation of 137Cs and three groups for 90Sr in food in radiocontaminated areas. The values of standards for individual product groups are recommended to be set proportionally to the measured specific activity in each of these groups, which will reduce unreasonable food rejection. The standards might be set for the entire country, and could be also used to control imports from other countries as well as exports to other countries. The developed recommendations were transferred in 2015-2016 to the regulatory authorities of the three countries.


Subject(s)
Chernobyl Nuclear Accident , Food Contamination, Radioactive/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioisotopes/analysis , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Food Safety , Humans , Infant , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Republic of Belarus , Russia , Time Factors , Ukraine , Young Adult
6.
Eur Radiol ; 27(11): 4846-4856, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28523354

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered the treatment of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysms with suitable anatomy. In order to improve radiation safety, European Directive (2013/59) requires member states to implement diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in radio-diagnostic and interventional procedures. This study aimed to determine local DRLs for EVAR across five European centres and identify an interim European DRL, which currently remains unestablished. METHODS: Retrospective data was collected for 180 standard EVARs performed between January 2014 and July 2015 from five specialist centres in Ireland (n=2) and Italy (n=3). Data capture included: air kerma-area product (PKA), total air kerma at the reference point (Ka,r), fluoroscopic time (FT), number of acquisitions, frame rate of acquisition, type of acquisition, patient height, weight, and gender. RESULTS: The mean values for each site A, B, C, D, and E were: PKAs of 4343 ± 994 µGym2, 18,200 ± 2141 µGym2, 11,423 ± 1390 µGym2, 7796 ± 704 µGym2, 31,897 ± 5798 µGym2; FTs of 816 ± 92 s, 950 ± 150 s, 708 ± 70 s, 972 ± 61 s, 827 ± 118 s; and number of acquisitions of 6.72 ± 0.56, 10.38 ± 1.54, 4.74 ± 0.19, 5.64 ± 0.36, 7.28 ± 0.65, respectively. The overall pooled 75th percentile PKA was 15,849 µGym2. CONCLUSION: Local reference levels were identified. The pooled data has been used to establish an interim European DRL for EVAR procedures. KEY POINTS: • Abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) requires the use of ionising radiation. • EVAR is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. • Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are used to monitor patient radiation exposure. • Radiation dose data was collected from five European centres for EVAR procedures. • Local DRLs have been determined and an interim European DRL is proposed.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Aged , Female , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Ireland , Italy , Male , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 28(3): 429-441, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28034700

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To obtain local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in diagnostic and therapeutic IR procedures with dose management software to improve radiation protection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose data of various vascular and nonvascular IR procedures performed within 18 months were collected and analyzed with dose management software. To account for different levels of complexity, procedures were subdivided into simple, standard, and difficult procedures as graded by interventional radiologists. Based on these analyses, local DRLs (given as kerma-area product [KAP]) were proposed. Comparison with dose data of others was conducted, and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate relationships between dose metrics. RESULTS: Analysis included 1,403 IR procedures (simple/standard/difficult, n = 346/702/355). Within the same procedure, KAP tended to increase with level of complexity. Overall, very strong correlation between KAP (Gy ∙ cm2) and cumulative air kerma (KA,R; Gy) was observed, and moderate to strong correlation between KAP and time and KA,R and time was observed. For simple procedures, strong correlation was seen between KAP and time and KA,R and time; for standard and difficult procedures, only moderate correlation was seen. Correlation between KAP and time and KA,R and time was strong in nonvascular procedures but only moderate in vascular procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Dose management software can be used to derive local DRLs for various IR procedures, taking into consideration different levels of complexity. Proposed local DRLs can contribute to obtaining detailed national DRLs as part of efforts to improve patients' radiation protection further.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/standards , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiography, Interventional/standards , Software/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Young Adult
9.
J Radiol Prot ; 37(2): 354-378, 2017 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28253200

ABSTRACT

In this work, conversion coefficients for the operational quantity H'(3;Ω) have been calculated for both mono-energetic photons from 2 keV to 50 MeV for angles of incidence from 0° up to 180° in steps of 15° (to complement ICRU 57) as well as for photon reference radiation qualities (to complement ISO 4037). Finally, parameters necessary to determine the influence of the air density on the conversion coefficients have been determined.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Photons , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/standards , Calibration , Humans , Models, Statistical
10.
Electromagn Biol Med ; 36(2): 132-140, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27463094

ABSTRACT

Electromagnetic pollution caused by mobile communication devices, a new form of environmental pollution, has been one of the most concerning problems to date. Consequences of long-term exposure to the electromagnetic radiation caused by cell phone towers are still unknown and can potentially be a new health hazard. It is important to measure, analyze and map the electromagnetic radiation levels periodically because of the potential risks. The electromagnetic pollution maps can be used for the detection of diseases caused by the radiation. With the help of the radiation maps of different regions, comparative analysis can be provided and distribution of the diseases can be investigated. In this article, Global System for Mobile communication (GSM)-based electromagnetic pollution map of the Rize Providence, which has high cancer rates because of the Chernobyl nuclear explosion, is generated. First, locations of the GSM base stations are identified and according to the antenna types of the base stations, safety distances are determined. Subsequently, 155 measurements are taken during November 2014 from the nearest living quarters of the Rize city center in Turkey. The measurements are then assessed statistically. Thenceforth, for visual judgment of the determined statistics, collected measurements are presented on the map. It is observed that national limits are not exceeded, but it is also discovered that the safety distance is waived at some of the measurement points and above the average radiation levels are noted. Even if the national limits are not exceeded, the long-term effects of the exposition to the electromagnetic radiation can cause serious health problems.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Radiation , Environmental Pollution/adverse effects , Radiation Monitoring , Telecommunications/standards , Black Sea , Environmental Pollution/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Turkey
11.
J Radiol Prot ; 37(1): 68-83, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27958195

ABSTRACT

This study aims to assess the adequacy level of radiological protection systems available in the diagnostic radiology facilities located in three capital cities of North East (NE) India. It further attempts to understand, using a multi-disciplinary approach, how the safety codes/standards in diagnostic radiology framed by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to achieve adequate radiological protection in facilities, have been perceived, conceptualized, and applied accordingly in these facilities. About 30 diagnostic radiology facilities were randomly selected from three capitals of states in NE India; namely Imphal (Manipur), Shillong (Meghalaya) and Guwahati (Assam). A semi-structured questionnaire developed based on a multi-disciplinary approach was used for this study. It was observed that radiological practices undertaken in these facilities were not exactly in line with safety codes/standards in diagnostic radiology of the AERB and the IAEA. About 50% of the facilities had registered/licensed x-ray equipment with the AERB. More than 80% of the workers did not use radiation protective devices, although these devices were available in the facilities. About 85% of facilities had no institutional risk management system. About 70% of the facilities did not carry out periodic quality assurance testing of their x-ray equipment or surveys of radiation leakage around the x-ray room, and did not display radiation safety indicators in the x-ray rooms. Workers in these facilities exhibited low risk perception about the risks associated with these practices. The majority of diagnostic radiology facilities in NE India did not comply with the radiological safety codes/standards framed by the AERB and IAEA. The study found inadequate levels of radiological protection systems in the majority of facilities. This study suggests a need to establish firm measures that comply with the radiological safety codes/standards of the AERB and IAEA to protect patients, workers and the public of this region.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/standards , Guideline Adherence , Humans , India , Radiation Dosage , Safety Management
12.
Med Pr ; 68(6): 693-703, 2017 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28930303

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Presented information about the welding process and equipment, focusing on the emission of electromagnetic field (EMF) with levels significant in terms of the labor safety regulations in force in Poland - the ordinances of the Minister of Family, Labour and Social Policy that came into force on June 27, 2016 and June 29, 2016 - emerged due to harmonization with European Union directive 2013/35/EU of 26 June 2013 of the European Parliament and the Council. They presented methods of determination of the EMF distribution in the welding machine surroundings and analyzed the background knowledge from the available literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subject of the analysis included popular high frequency welders widely used in the industry. Electromagnetic field measurements were performed in the welder operating place (in situ) during machine normal operations, using measurement methods accordant with labor safety regulations in force in Poland and according to the same guidelines, the EMF distributions and parameters having been described. RESULTS: They presented various scenarios of particular, real examples of excessive exposure to EMF in the dielectric welder surroundings and showed solutions, ranging from simple and costless and ending on dedicated electromagnetic shielding systems, which allowed to reduce EMF exposure in some cases of more than 80% (protection zone ranges) or eliminate dangerous zone presence. CONCLUSIONS: It has shown that in the dielectric welders surrounding, significant EMF strength levels may be the result of errors or omissions which often occur during development, installation, operation or modification of welding machines. It has allowed to present the measures that may significantly reduce the exposure to EMF of workers in the welder surroundings. The role of accredited laboratories in helping in such cases was underlined. Med Pr 2017;68(6):693-703.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Welding/standards , European Union , Hand/radiation effects , Head/radiation effects , Humans , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Poland , Threshold Limit Values , Torso/radiation effects
13.
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig ; 68(1): 99-103, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28303708

ABSTRACT

Background: X-ray examination is a popular and universally used injury and disease diagnostic method. A distinctive X ray examination feature is that it can be done quickly which is extremely important in case of the need for rapid diagnosis of patients in life threatening condition. Another advantage of the X-ray examinations is also relatively low cost of carry. However, X-ray examination involve adverse health effects. During the examination the patient is subjected to ionizing radiation that might have impact on his health. Objective: The aim of this study has been to determine and assess the size of the entrance surface doses (ESD) received by patients during selected X-ray examinations performed on the basis of the medical working procedures available in healthcare entities in Masovian Voivodeship in Poland. Materials and Method: The examinations were conducted for 71 X-ray units located in the Masovian Voivodeship. Measurements of doses received by the patients were based on our own validated test methods. Results: It was found that the range applied to the high voltage in healthcare entities does not always coincide with the values specified in the standard procedures. It was found in the skull projection radiography AP and LAT that the recorded values were from range 60 to 82 kV (the average value of 74 kV) while in accordance with a standard procedure they should be in the range from 65 to 75 kV. Only in case of cervical spine radiography in the AP projection, the LAT exposure conditions were matching with the standard obligatory procedures in Poland. The consequence of selecting exposure conditions are significant differences in the size of the doses the patient receive during the same medical procedures. The greatest range of ESD doses was found during radiography of the thoracic spine in the projection AP and LAT. The projection LAT measured values were in the range of 523 to 10550 µGy (average value 2175 µGy). Conclusions: It is necessary to update immediately the standard procedures and to develop detailed guidelines for the preparation of working procedures in X-ray rooms.


Subject(s)
Equipment Safety/standards , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiography/standards , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Body Burden , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Poland , Radioactive Hazard Release/prevention & control
15.
Magn Reson Med ; 76(4): 1291-300, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26525160

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to conduct an exposure assessment for workers moving through the stray stationary field of common MRI scanners, performed according to the recent International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines, which aim at avoiding annoying sensory effects. THEORY AND METHODS: The analysis was performed through numerical simulations, using a high-resolution anatomical model that moved along realistic trajectories in proximity to a tubular and open MRI scanner. Both dosimetric indexes indicated by ICNIRP (maximum variation of the magnetic flux density vector and exposure index for the motion-induced electric field) were computed for three statures of the human model. RESULTS: A total of 51 exposure situations were analyzed. None of them exceeded the limit for the maximum variation of the magnetic flux density, whereas some critical cases were found when computing the induced electric field. In the latter case, the exposure indexes computed via Fourier transform and through an equivalent filter result to be consistent. CONCLUSION: The results suggest the adoption of some simple precautionary rules, useful when sensory effects experienced by an operator could reflect upon the patient's safety. Moreover, some open issues regarding the quantification of motion-induced fields are highlighted, putting in evidence the need for clarification at standardization level. Magn Reson Med 76:1291-1300, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/standards , Adult , Humans , Internationality , Magnetic Fields , Male , Motion , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Safety Management/standards
16.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 13(10): D166-74, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27310266

ABSTRACT

With respect to radiation protection for decontamination efforts involving radioactive fallout emitted by the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Atomic Power Plant, new regulations were established and obligated employers to monitor, record, and store of workers' dose records, and to check their past dose records at the time of employment. However, cumulative doses may not be properly maintained if a worker declares incorrect values for past doses. In response, with facilitation from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, primary contractors of decontamination works decided to establish a central dose registration system. There are four major issues in the design of the system to be resolved, included the following: primary contractors (a) do not have a legal responsibility to perform dose control for subcontractors, (b) do not have the right to control decontamination sites, (c) often organize joint ventures, and (d) correspond to a wide range of ambient dose rates. To resolve the issues, requirements of the system included the following: (a) centralize the operation of radiation passbooks, which records past doses and the results of medical examinations to each worker; (b) develop a database system that could register all dose data and accept inquiry from primary contractors; (c) establish a permanent data storage system for transferred records; and (d) provide graded type of services that are appropriate to the risk of radiation exposure. The system started its operation in December 2013 and provided dose distributions in April and July 2015. The average yearly dose in 2014 was 0.7 mSv, which increased by 0.2 mSv from 0.5 mSv in 2012 and 2013. However, no cumulative dose from 2012-2014 exceeded 20 mSv, which was far below than the dose limits (100 mSv/5 years and 50 mSv/year). Although current dose distributions of decontamination workers were within appropriate levels, careful monitoring of dose distribution is necessary for preserving the proper implementation of radiation protection prescribed in the regulations.


Subject(s)
Decontamination , Fukushima Nuclear Accident , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/standards , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Databases, Factual , Humans , Japan , Nuclear Power Plants/standards
17.
J Radiol Prot ; 36(4): 842-857, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27739403

ABSTRACT

Ambient dose equivalent H *(10) is an operational quantity recommended by the IAEA to establish dose constraints in area monitoring for external radiation. The direct measurement of H *(10) is not common due to the complexity in the calibration procedures of radiation monitors involving the use of expanded and aligned radiation fields. Therefore, conversion coefficients are used to assess H *(10) from the physical quantity air-kerma. Conversion coefficients published by international commissions, ICRU and ICRP, present a correlation with the radiation beam quality. However, Brazilian regulation establishes 1.14 Sv Gy-1 as unique conversion coefficient to convert air-kerma into H *(10), disregarding its beam quality dependence. The present study computed mean conversion coefficients from secondary and transmitted x-ray beams in order to improve the current assessment of H *(10). The weighting of conversion coefficients corresponding to monoenergetic beams with the spectrum energy distribution in terms of air-kerma was used to compute the mean conversion coefficients. In order to represent dedicated chest radiographic facilities, an anthropomorphic phantom was used as scatter object of the primary beam. Secondary x-ray spectra were measured in the diagnostic energy range at scattering angles of 30°, 60°, 90° 120° and 150° degrees. Barite mortar plates were used as attenuator of the secondary beam to produce the corresponding transmitted x-ray spectra. Results show that the mean conversion coefficients are about 43% higher than the recommended value accepted by Brazilian regulation. For secondary radiation measured at 100 kV the mean coefficient should be 1.46 Sv Gy-1, which represent the higher value in the mean coefficient set corresponding to secondary beams. Moreover, for transmitted x-ray beams at 100 kV, the recommended mean conversion coefficient is 1.65 Sv Gy-1 for all barite mortar plate thickness and all scattering angles. An example of application shows the discrepancy in the evaluation of secondary shielding barriers in a controlled area when the shielding goals is evaluated. The conclusion based on these results is that a unique coefficient may not be adequate for deriving the H *(10).


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiology , Brazil , Radiation Protection , Scattering, Radiation , X-Rays
18.
Gig Sanit ; 95(11): 1045-8, 2016.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29431942

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to give the description of harmful effects of the impact of electromagnetic radiations from base stations of cellular communication as the most common sources of radio frequencies of electromagnetic fields in the environment. The highest values of the energy flux density were measured on the roofs of houses where antennas are installed - more than 10 pW/cm. The lowest values were recorded in inside premises with expositions of 0.1-1 pW/cm. In the close location of the railway station to the base stations of the cellular communication there was seen a cumulative effect. There are proposed both new safe hygienic approaches to the control for the safety of the work of base station and protective measures.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure , Electromagnetic Radiation , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Humans , Public Health/methods , Public Health/standards , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standards , Russia/epidemiology
20.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 16(6): 423­434, 2015 11 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26699565

ABSTRACT

We characterized the energy response of personal dose equivalent (Hp(10) in mrem) and the contribution of backscatter to the readings of two electronic personal dosimeter (EPD) models with radionuclides commonly used in a nuclear medicine clinic. The EPD models characterized were the RADOS RAD-60R, and the SAIC PD-10i. The experimental setup and calculation of EPD energy response was based on ANSI/HPS N13.11-2009. Fifteen RAD-60R and 2 PD-10i units were irradiated using (99m)Tc, (131)I, and (18)F radionuclides with emission energies at 140 keV, 364 keV, and 511 keV, respectively. At each energy, the EPDs output in Hp(10) [mrem] were recorded with 15 inch thick PMMA to simulate backscatter form the torso. Simultaneous free-in-air exposure rate measurements were also performed using two Victoreen ionization survey meters to calculate the expected EPD Hp(10) values per ANSI/HPS N13.11-2009. The energy response was calculated by taking the ratio of the EPD Hp(10) readings with the expected Hp(10) readings and a two-tailed z-test was used to determine the significance of the ratio deviating away from unity. The contribution from backscatter was calculated by taking the ratio of the EPD Hp(10) readings with and without backscatter material. A paired, two-tailed t-test was used to determine the significance of change in EPD Hp(10) readings. The RAD-60R mean energy response at 140 keV was 0.85, and agreed to within 5% and 11% at 364 and 511 keV, respectively. The PD-10i mean energy response at 140 keV was 1.20, and agreed to within 5% at 364 and 511 keV, respectively. On average, in the presence of acrylic, RAD-60R values increased by 32%, 12%, and 14%, at 140, 364, and 511 keV, respectively; all increases were statistically significant. The PD-10i increased by 25%, 19%, and 10% at 140 keV, 364 keV, and 511 keV, respectively; however, only the 140 keV measurement was statistically significant. Although both EPD models performed within the manufacturers' specifications of ± 25% in the energy ranges used, they fell outside of our criteria of 10% at lower energies, suggesting the need to calculate energy-dependent correction factors, depending on the intended EPD use.


Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Calibration , Health Physics , Humans , Occupational Exposure , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Protection , Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Radioisotopes/standards , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/standards , Radiometry/statistics & numerical data , Scattering, Radiation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL