Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.086
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Radiology ; 311(1): e240219, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652030

ABSTRACT

Climate change adversely affects the well-being of humans and the entire planet. A planetary health framework recognizes that sustaining a healthy planet is essential to achieving individual, community, and global health. Radiology contributes to the climate crisis by generating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during the production and use of medical imaging equipment and supplies. To promote planetary health, strategies that mitigate and adapt to climate change in radiology are needed. Mitigation strategies to reduce GHG emissions include switching to renewable energy sources, refurbishing rather than replacing imaging scanners, and powering down unused scanners. Radiology departments must also build resiliency to the now unavoidable impacts of the climate crisis. Adaptation strategies include education, upgrading building infrastructure, and developing departmental sustainability dashboards to track progress in achieving sustainability goals. Shifting practices to catalyze these necessary changes in radiology requires a coordinated approach. This includes partnering with key stakeholders, providing effective communication, and prioritizing high-impact interventions. This article reviews the intersection of planetary health and radiology. Its goals are to emphasize why we should care about sustainability, showcase actions we can take to mitigate our impact, and prepare us to adapt to the effects of climate change. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the article by Ibrahim et al in this issue. See also the article by Lenkinski and Rofsky in this issue.


Subject(s)
Climate Change , Global Health , Humans , Greenhouse Gases , Radiology , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration
2.
Radiology ; 311(2): e232329, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742975

ABSTRACT

Background High rates of provider burnout and turnover, as well as staffing shortages, are creating crises within radiology departments. Identifying ways to support health care workers, such as the Positively Energizing Leadership program, is important during these ongoing crises. Purpose To identify the relationship between leadership behaviors and workplace climate and health care worker outcomes (ie, burnout, intent to leave, and engagement) and to determine whether the positive leadership program could improve workplace climate and health care worker outcomes. Materials and Methods This prospective study involved two parts. First, a web-based survey was administered to faculty and staff in a breast imaging unit of a large academic medical center in February 2021 to identify relationships between leadership behaviors and workplace climate and health care worker outcomes. Second, a web-based survey was administered in February 2023, following the implementation of a positive leadership program, to determine improvement in engagement and reduction of burnout and intent to leave since 2021. Multiple regression, the Sobel test, Pearson correlation, and the t test were used, with a conservative significance level of P < .001. Results The sample consisted of 88 respondents (response rate, 95%) in 2021 and 85 respondents (response rate, 92%) in 2023. Leadership communication was associated with a positive workplace climate (ß = 0.76, P < .001) and a positive workplace climate was associated with improved engagement (ß = 0.53, P < .001), reduction in burnout (ß = -0.42, P < .001), and reduction in intent to leave (ß = -0.49, P < .001). Following a 2-year positive leadership program, improved perceptions were observed for leadership communication (pretest mean, 4.59 ± 1.51 [SD]; posttest mean, 5.80 ± 1.01; t = 5.97, P < .001), workplace climate (pretest mean, 5.09 ± 1.43; posttest mean, 5.77 ± 1.11; t = 3.35, P < .001), and engagement (pretest mean, 5.27 ± 1.20, posttest mean, 5.68 ± 0.96; t = 2.50, P < .01), with a reduction in burnout (pretest mean, 2.69 ± 0.94; posttest mean, 2.18 ± 0.74; t = 3.50, P < .001) and intent to leave (pretest mean, 3.12 ± 2.23; posttest mean, 2.56 ± 1.84; t = 1.78, P < .05). Conclusion After implementation of a positive leadership program in a radiology department breast imaging unit, burnout and intention to leave decreased among health care workers, while engagement increased. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Thrall in this issue.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Leadership , Humans , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Female , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Adult , Male , Job Satisfaction , Intention , Personnel Turnover/statistics & numerical data , Workplace/psychology , Middle Aged
3.
Curr Opin Urol ; 34(5): 390-395, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847801

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is an ever-growing focus on climate change and its impact on our society. With healthcare contributing a sizeable proportion of carbon emissions, the sector has a duty to address its environmental impact. We highlight the recent progress, current challenges, and future prospects for reducing the carbon footprint in diagnostic urology, specifically for imaging, without compromising patient care. RECENT FINDINGS: The review is separated into four key areas of recent research: the design of a green radiology department, considering both infrastructural as well as behavioural changes that promote sustainability; individual scanners, where we provide an update on recent technological advancements and changes in behaviour that may enhance sustainable use; responsible resource allocation, where it is important to derive the maximal benefit for patients through the smallest use of resources; the recent research regarding single versus reusable urologic endoscopes as a case example. SUMMARY: We offer an overview of the present sustainability landscape in diagnostic urology with the aim of encouraging additional research in areas where existing practices may be challenged. To protect the environment, attention is drawn to both more simple steps that can be taken as well as some more complex and expensive ones.


Subject(s)
Carbon Footprint , Carbon Footprint/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Urology/methods , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Diagnostic Techniques, Urological/trends , Climate Change
4.
Radiographics ; 44(9): e230162, 2024 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146206

ABSTRACT

Inclusive leadership styles value team members, invite diverse perspectives, and recognize and support the contributions of employees. The authors provide guidance to radiology leaders interested in developing inclusive leadership skills and competencies to improve workforce recruitment and retention and unlock the potential of a rapidly diversifying health care workforce. As health care organizations look to attract the best and brightest talent, they will be increasingly recruiting millennial and Generation Z employees, who belong to the most diverse generations in American history. Additionally, radiology departments currently face critical workforce shortages in radiologists, radiology technicians, staff, and advanced practice providers. In the context of these shortages, the costs of employee turnover have emphasized the need for radiology leaders to develop leadership behaviors that promote recruitment and retention. Radiology department leaders who perceive and treat valued employees as replaceable commodities will be forced to deal with the extremely high costs associated with recruitment and training, decreased morale, and increased burnout. The authors review inclusive versus exclusive leadership styles, describe key attributes and skills of inclusive leaders, provide radiology leaders with concrete methods to make their organizations more inclusive, and outline key steps in change management. By adopting and implementing inclusive leadership strategies, radiology groups can position themselves to succeed in rapidly diversifying health care environments. ©RSNA, 2024 See the invited commentary by Siewert in this issue.


Subject(s)
Leadership , Radiology Department, Hospital , Humans , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Personnel Selection , Radiologists , United States , Cultural Diversity , Radiology/organization & administration
5.
Pediatr Radiol ; 54(6): 936-943, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483592

ABSTRACT

Human factors engineering involves the study and development of methods aimed at enhancing performance, improving safety, and optimizing user satisfaction. The focus of human factors engineering encompasses the design of work environments and an understanding of human mental processes to prevent errors. In this review, we summarize the history, applications, and impacts of human factors engineering on the healthcare field. To illustrate these applications and impacts, we provide several examples of how successful integration of a human factors engineer in our pediatric radiology department has positively impacted various projects. The successful integration of human factors engineering expertise has contributed to projects including improving response times for portable radiography requests, deploying COVID-19 response resources, informing the redesign of scheduling workflows, and implementation of a virtual ergonomics program for remote workers. In sum, the integration of human factors engineering insight into our department has resulted in tangible benefits and has also positioned us as proactive contributors to broader hospital-wide improvements.


Subject(s)
Ergonomics , Pediatrics , Ergonomics/methods , Humans , Pediatrics/methods , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Radiology/organization & administration , Radiology/methods , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Emerg Radiol ; 31(3): 429-434, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581613

ABSTRACT

Overnight radiology (ONR) is necessary for providing timely patient care but poses unique professional and personal challenges to the radiologists. Maintaining a sustainable, long-term overnight radiology program hinges on the retention of radiologists who grasp the institutional workflow and can adeptly navigate inherent disruptions while consistently delivering high-quality patient care. Design of radiology shifts can significantly impact the performance and well-being of radiologists, with downstream implications for patient care and risk management. We provide a narrative review of literature to make recommendations for optimally designing ONR shifts, with a focus on professional and personal challenges pertinent to overnight radiologists and system-based risk mitigation strategies.


Subject(s)
Radiology Department, Hospital , Humans , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Workflow , Radiologists , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Risk Management
7.
Radiology ; 299(1): E187-E192, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33399509

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has spread across the world since December 2019, infecting 100 million and killing millions. The impact on health care institutions during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been considerable, with exhaustion of institutional and personal protective equipment resources during local outbreaks and crushing financial consequences for many institutions. Establishing adaptive principles of leadership is necessary during crises, fostering quick decision-making and workflow modifications, while a rapid review of data must determine necessary course corrections. This report describes concepts of crisis leadership teams that can help maximize their effectiveness during the current and future pandemics.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Leadership , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Humans , North America , SARS-CoV-2 , Societies, Medical
8.
Eur Radiol ; 31(1): 468-474, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780206

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak poses a serious public health risk. To date, the disease has affected almost all countries in the world. The enormous scale of the outbreak and the relative lack of knowledge and information regarding a new virus, as well as the unpredictability of events, make it challenging for leadership teams to respond. This paper shares how we have reconfigured our radiology leadership team into a smaller disease outbreak task force (DOTF) to respond and coordinate all related efforts during this ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The DOTF format is modelled after the military with domain groups looking at manpower, intelligence, operations, and logistics matters on a daily basis so that timely decisions can be made and action plans executed promptly. In managing the DOTF, discipline, flexibility, and teamwork are key principles, and these are built upon a strong foundation of focus on infection prevention and control, and patient and staff safety as well as staff well-being. The DOTF has positioned us well to confront the many challenges to date. We believe it will also help us navigate the complex issues that will arise with future surges in cases and in formulating strategies to manage exit from the present and future lockdowns. KEY POINTS: • In a pandemic, regular and directed meetings by a smaller leadership core group are required, for prompt decision making and execution of action plans. • The military format, with domain groups to look at manpower, intelligence, operations, and logistics matters, is useful in managing a pandemic. • Discipline, flexibility, and teamwork with strong focus on infection prevention and control, and patient and staff safety as well as staff well-being are key principles for leadership teams managing a pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Infection Control , Leadership , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/transmission , Clinical Decision-Making , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics , Personnel Administration, Hospital , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapore/epidemiology
9.
Clin Radiol ; 76(6): 443-446, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33745705

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess, via a survey of UK radiological departments, if the COVID-19 pandemic led to a change in radiological reporting undertaken in a home environment with appropriate IT support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All imaging departments in the UK were contacted and asked about the provision of home reporting and IT support before and after the first wave of the pandemic. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven of the 217 departments contacted replied, producing a response rate of 61%. There was a 147% increase in the provision of remote access viewing and reporting platforms during the pandemic. Although 578 consultants had access to a viewing platform pre-pandemic, this had increased to 1,431 during the course of the first wave. CONCLUSION: This survey represents work undertaken by UK NHS Trusts in co-ordinating and providing increased home-reporting facilities to UK radiologists during the first wave of this global pandemic. The impact of these facilities has been shown to allow more than just the provision of reporting of both elective and emergency imaging and provides additional flexibility in how UK radiologists can help support and provide services. This is a good start, but there are potential problems that now need to be overcome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Teleworking , Health Care Surveys , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom/epidemiology
10.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 37(9): 520-527, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34353172

ABSTRACT

Protection of patients against hospital-acquired infections is of major importance. Disinfection of magnetic resonance imaging suites is, due to their unique properties and environment particularly, difficult to implement. We developed an OPTI-JET CS MD 2ZE aerosolizator for disinfection of a magnetic resonance imaging suite using the electrolyzed oxidizing water biocide Steriplant©N. The disinfection of the magnetic resonance imaging suite with this system reduced from the number of colony formed unit/m3 air by 87% and 96% in 6 and 15 min of disinfection, respectively. It is well known that exposure of personnel or patients to aerosols may represent risk to the respiratory system; therefore, the aim of this study was to assess potential cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Steriplant©N aerosolization toward human alveolar cells A459 in vitro. The A459 cells were exposed to aerosol containing different concentrations (50% and 100% v/v) of Steripalnt©N for 6 min in a chamber that had been constructed to simulate the conditions in the magnetic resonance imaging suite. The cytotoxicity was evaluated by measuring iodide uptake, and the genotoxicity was determined by measuring formation of phosphorylated H2AX histones, a marker for deoxyribonucleic acid double-strand breaks, immediately after the aerosolization and after 1, 4, and 24 h postincubation. The results demonstrated that aerosolization with Steriplant©N at conditions reflecting aerosolization in a magnetic resonance imaging suite is not cytotoxic and does not exhibit genotoxic potential in vitro.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/pharmacology , Alveolar Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Disinfection/methods , Iodides/pharmacology , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Cell Survival/drug effects , DNA Damage/drug effects , Environmental Exposure , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mutagenicity Tests , Particle Size , Radiology Department, Hospital/standards
11.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 72(3): 548-556, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32103671

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of 24/7/365 attending radiologist coverage on the turnaround time (TAT) of trauma and nontrauma cases in an emergency and trauma radiology department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review in which TAT of patients coming to the emergency department between 2 periods: (1) December 1, 2012, to September 30, 2013, and (2) January 1, 2017, to January 30, 2018, and whose reports were read by an attending emergency and trauma radiologist was noted. RESULTS: The 24/7/365 radiology coverage was associated with a significant reduction in TAT of computed tomography reports, and the time reduction was comparable between trauma and nontrauma cases. In adjusted models, the extension of radiology coverage was associated with an average of 7.83 hours reduction in overall TAT (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.44-8.22) for reports related to trauma, in which 2.73 hours were due to reduction in completion to transcription time (TC; 95% CI: 2.53-2.93), and 5.10 hours were due to reduction in transcription to finalization time (TF; 95% CI: 4.75-5.44). For reports related to nontrauma cases, 24/7/365 coverage was associated with an average of 6.07 hours reduction in overall TAT (95% CI: 3.54-8.59), 2.91 hours reduction in TC (95% CI: 1.55-4.26), and 3.16 hours reduction in TF (95% CI: 0.90-5.42). CONCLUSION: Our pilot study demonstrates that the implementation of on-site 24/7/365 attending emergency radiology coverage at a tertiary care center was associated with a reduced TAT for trauma and nontrauma patients imaging studies. Although the magnitude and precision of estimates were slightly higher for trauma cases as compared to nontrauma cases. Trauma examinations stand to benefit the most from 24/7/365 attending level radiology coverage.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Radiologists/organization & administration , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging
12.
Radiology ; 296(2): E26-E31, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32267209

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic initially manifested in the United States in the greater Seattle area and has rapidly progressed across the nation in the past 2 months, with the United States having the highest number of cases in the world. Radiology departments play a critical role in policy and guideline development both for the department and for the institutions, specifically in planning diagnostic screening, triage, and management of patients. In addition, radiology workflows, volumes, and access must be optimized in preparation for the expected surges in the number of patients with COVID-19. In this article, the authors discuss the processes that have been implemented at the University of Washington in managing the COVID-19 pandemic as well in preparing for patient surges, which may provide important guidance for other radiology departments who are in the early stages of preparation and management.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Policy , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Disaster Planning , Hospitalization , Hospitals, University , Humans , Pandemics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiology Department, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Radiology Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Washington
13.
Radiology ; 296(2): E26-E31, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32687455

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic initially manifested in the United States in the greater Seattle area and has rapidly progressed across the nation in the past 2 months, with the United States having the highest number of cases in the world. Radiology departments play a critical role in policy and guideline development both for the department and for the institutions, specifically in planning diagnostic screening, triage, and management of patients. In addition, radiology workflows, volumes, and access must be optimized in preparation for the expected surges in the number of patients with COVID-19. In this article, the authors discuss the processes that have been implemented at the University of Washington in managing the COVID-19 pandemic as well in preparing for patient surges, which may provide important guidance for other radiology departments who are in the early stages of preparation and management.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Infection Control/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Health Policy , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Mass Screening/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Washington
14.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 196(12): 1080-1085, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33123776

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The described work aimed to avoid cancellations of indispensable treatments by implementing active patient flow management practices and optimizing infrastructure utilization in the radiation oncology department of a large university hospital and regional COVID-19 treatment center close to the first German SARS-CoV­2 hotspot region Heinsberg in order to prevent nosocomial infections in patients and personnel during the pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised year-to-date intervention analyses of in- and outpatient key procedures, machine occupancy, and no-show rates in calendar weeks 12 to 19 of 2019 and 2020 to evaluate effects of active patient flow management while monitoring nosocomial COVID-19 infections. RESULTS: Active patient flow management helped to maintain first-visit appointment compliance above 85.5%. A slight appointment reduction of 10.3% daily (p = 0.004) could still significantly increase downstream planning CT scheduling (p = 0.00001) and performance (p = 0.0001), resulting in an absolute 20.1% (p = 0.009) increment of CT performance while avoiding overbooking practices. Daily treatment start was significantly increased by an absolute value of 18.5% (p = 0.026). Hypofractionation and acceleration were significantly increased (p = 0.0043). Integrating strict testing guidelines, a distancing regimen for staff and patients, hygiene regulations, and precise appointment scheduling, no SARS-CoV­2 infection in 164 tested radiation oncology service inpatients was observed. CONCLUSION: In times of reduced medical infrastructure capacities and resources, controlling infrastructural time per patient as well as optimizing facility utilization and personnel workload during treatment evaluation, planning, and irradiation can help to improve appointment compliance and quality management. Avoiding recurrent and preventable exposure to healthcare infrastructure has potential health benefits and might avert cross infections during the pandemic. Active patient flow management in high-risk COVID-19 regions can help Radiation Oncologists to continue and initiate treatments safely, instead of cancelling and deferring indicated therapies.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Infection Control/organization & administration , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics , Radiation Oncology/organization & administration , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Workflow , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Neoplasms/surgery , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Personal Protective Equipment , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , Radiology Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Radiosurgery/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Triage/methods , Triage/standards
15.
Eur Radiol ; 30(1): 501-503, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31359123

ABSTRACT

KEY POINTS: • Communication with patients in radiology is, in general, indirect using the referrer as a conduit. • Direct patient communication may be beneficial for radiology departments and radiologists to improve patient awareness about the nature of our role and also to provide correct and measured information about the nature and frequency of discrepancies in radiology.


Subject(s)
Communication , Physician-Patient Relations , Radiologists/psychology , Radiology/organization & administration , Humans , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration
16.
Eur Radiol ; 30(7): 3603-3608, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32300968

ABSTRACT

Since a novel coronavirus was discovered from a cluster of patients with emerging pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China, it has spread rapidly through droplet and contact transmission. Recently, the novel coronavirus pneumonia which was named COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO) has been raised as a worldwide problem. Radiological examinations were confirmed as effective methods for the screening and diagnosis of COVID-19. It is reported that some radiologists and radiological technologists were infected when giving examinations to the patients with COVID-19. In order to reduce the infection risk of medical staff in radiology department, we summarized the experience on prevention and control measures in radiology department for COVID-19, aiming to guide the prevention and practical work for radiologists and radiological technologists. KEY POINTS: • The novel coronavirus spreads rapidly through droplet and contact transmission. • Radiologists and radiological technologists were possibly infected by patients. • Prevention and control measures in radiology department for COVID-19 are important.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Workplace
17.
Eur Radiol ; 30(9): 4713-4723, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32435926

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate organisational reporting infrastructure and patient-related reporting data in the diagnosis of vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) as demonstrated on computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Organisational and patient-specific questionnaires were developed by consensus between The Royal College of Radiologists, the Royal College of Physicians, and the Royal Osteoporosis Society. The patient-specific component of the audit involved analysis of CT reporting data acquired from 50 consecutive non-traumatic studies including the thoracolumbar spine. Ethical approval for this type of study is not required in the UK. All UK radiology departments with an audit lead (auditor) registered with The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) were invited to participate in this retrospective audit. RESULTS: In total, 127 out of 202 departments (63%) supplied data to the study, with inclusion of 6357 patients. Overall, 1362/6357 patients (21.4%) had a fracture present on auditor review of the CT imaging. There was a lack of compliance with all audit standards: 79% of reports commented on the vertebrae (target 100%), fracture severity was mentioned in 26.2% (target 100%), the recommended terminology 'vertebral fracture' was used in 60.1% (target 100%), and appropriate onward referral was recommended in 2.6% (target 100%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study should be used to provide impetus to improve the diagnosis and care for patients with osteoporotic VFFs. Solutions are multifactorial, but radiologist and local osteoporosis/fracture liaison service engagement is fundamental, combined with necessary development of electronic report notification systems and expansion of supporting fracture services. KEY POINTS: • Early detection and diagnosis of vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) significantly reduce patient morbidity and mortality. This study describes the results of a retrospective UK-wide audit evaluating current radiology reporting practice in the opportunistic diagnosis of VFFs as demonstrated on computed tomography (CT) studies including the spine. • Key audit standards included comment made on bone integrity in primary report (target 100%), comment made on severity of fractures (90%), report used recommended terminology 'fracture' (100%), and report made appropriate recommendations for referral/further assessment (100%). The audit results demonstrated a lack of compliance with all audit standards; lack of compliance was most marked in the use of recommended terminology (achieved 60.3%), in relation to comment on fracture severity (achieved 26.2%) and for recommendation for referral/further assessment (achieved 2.6%). • Solutions are challenging and multifactorial but the opportunity exists for all radiologists to examine their practice and directly improve patient care.


Subject(s)
Medical Records/standards , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , United Kingdom
18.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(11): 1857-1863, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33041175

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess changes in operational utilization following conversion of a single IR suite to a hybrid CT/angiography (Angio-CT) system at an academic tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The total number of interventional procedures and diagnostic CT examinations performed in 29 rooms (20 diagnostic radiology, 7 IR, 2 shared between divisions) was calculated in the 24 months before conversion of an IR suite to Angio-CT and 12 months after conversion. The total number of IR procedures (global IR/month) and diagnostic CT scans per month (global CT/month) in both before and after conversion periods was calculated and defined as baseline institutional growth. This was compared against the change in the number of IR procedures performed in the before and after periods in the converted room (Angio-CT/month) as well as the number of diagnostic CT scans performed in the shared rooms (shared CT/month). RESULTS: The percent change in global CT and global IR from the before to the after periods was 39.2% and 3.1%, respectively. Shared CT per month and Angio-CT per month increased by 46.7% and 12.0% across the same time periods, respectively. The ratio of the percent increase in Angio-CT per month to percent increase in global IR per month was 3.87. The ratio of the percent increase in shared CT per month to percent increase in global CT per month was 1.19. CONCLUSIONS: Operational utilization improved in both diagnostic radiology and IR sections following conversion of a conventional fluoroscopic IR suite to an Angio-CT room.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , Computed Tomography Angiography , Hospital Units/organization & administration , Radiography, Interventional , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Radiology Information Systems/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Workflow , Workload
19.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 215(4): 940-944, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32352309

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE. Because CT plays an important role in diagnosis, isolation, treatment, and effective evaluation of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), infection prevention and control management of CT examination rooms is important. CONCLUSION. We describe modifications to the CT examination process, strict disinfection of examination rooms, arrangement of waiting areas, and efforts to increase radiographers' awareness of personal protection made at our institution during the COVID-19 outbreak. In addition, we discuss the potential of using artificial intelligence in imaging patients with contagious diseases.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Infection Control/standards , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Artificial Intelligence , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Disinfection/standards , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2
20.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 214(6): 1206-1210, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32130047

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE. This article shares the ground operational perspective of how a tertiary hospital radiology department in Singapore is responding to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic. This same department was also deeply impacted by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003. CONCLUSION. Though similar to SARS, the COVID-19 outbreak has several differences. We share how lessons from 2003 are applied and modified in our ongoing operational response to this evolving novel pathogen.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Epidemics , Infection Control/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Radiology Department, Hospital/standards , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control , COVID-19 , Humans , Singapore/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL