Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 53
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Mol Biol Rep ; 51(1): 777, 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904698

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Senecavirus A (SV-A) is an RNA virus that belongs to the genus Senecavirus within the family Picornaviridae. This study aimed to analyze factors that can influence the molecular diagnosis of Senecavirus A, such as oligonucleotides, RNA extraction methods, and RT-qPCR kits. METHODS: Samples from suspected cases of vesicular disease in Brazilian pigs were analyzed for foot-and-mouth disease, swine vesicular disease, and vesicular stomatitis. All tested negative for these diseases but positive for SV-A. RT-qPCR tests were used, comparing different reagent kits and RNA extraction methods. Sensitivity and repeatability were evaluated, demonstrating efficacy in detecting SV-A in clinical samples. RESULTS: In RNA extraction, significant reduction in Cq values was observed with initial dilutions, particularly with larger supernatant volumes. Trizol and Maxwell showed greater sensitivity in automated equipment protocols, though results varied in tissue tests. RT-qPCR kit comparison revealed differences in amplification using viral RNA but minimal differences with plasmid DNA. Sensitivity among methods was comparable, with slight variations in non-amplified samples. Repeatability tests showed consistent results among RT-qPCRs, demonstrating similarity between methods despite minor discrepancies in Cq values. CONCLUSIONS: Trizol, silica columns, and semi-automated extraction were compared, as well as different RT-qPCR kits. The study found significant variations that could impact the final diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Picornaviridae Infections , Picornaviridae , RNA, Viral , Swine Diseases , Animals , Picornaviridae/genetics , Picornaviridae/isolation & purification , Swine , Picornaviridae Infections/diagnosis , Picornaviridae Infections/veterinary , Picornaviridae Infections/virology , RNA, Viral/genetics , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Brazil , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Mol Cell Probes ; 53: 101643, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32768439

ABSTRACT

Porcine vesicular disease caused by Senecavirus A (SVA) is a newly emerging disease in many countries. Based on clinical signs only, it is very challenging to distinguish SVA infection from other similar diseases, such as foot and mouth disease, swine vesicular disease, and vesicular stomatitis. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a detection assay for the clinical diagnosis of SVA infection. In this study, a pair of specific primers were designed based on the highly conserved L/VP4 gene sequence of SVA. The established SYBR green I-based quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) method was used to detect SVA nucleic acids in clinical samples. The limit of detection SVA nucleic acids by qRT-PCR was 6.4 × 101 copies/µL, which was significantly more sensitive than that by gel electrophoresis of 6.4 × 103 copes/µL. This assay was specific and had no cross-reaction with other seven swine viruses. Using SYBR green I-based qRT-PCR, the SVA positive rates in experimental animal samples and field samples were 67.60% (96/142) and 80% (24/30) respectively. The results demonstrate that SYBR green I-based qRT-PCR is a rapid and specific method for the clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigation of related vesicular diseases caused by SVA.


Subject(s)
Benzothiazoles/chemistry , Capsid Proteins/genetics , Diamines/chemistry , Picornaviridae/isolation & purification , Quinolines/chemistry , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Animals , Limit of Detection , Picornaviridae/genetics , Picornaviridae Infections/diagnosis , Picornaviridae Infections/veterinary , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Swine , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(8): 2082-9, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27225408

ABSTRACT

We performed a longitudinal field study in a swine breeding herd that presented with an outbreak of vesicular disease (VD) that was associated with an increase in neonatal mortality. Initially, a USDA Foreign Animal Disease (FAD) investigation confirmed the presence of Senecavirus A (SVA) and ruled out the presence of exotic agents that produce vesicular lesions, e.g., foot-and-mouth disease virus and others. Subsequently, serum samples, tonsil swabs, and feces were collected from sows (n = 22) and their piglets (n = 33) beginning 1 week after the onset of the clinical outbreak and weekly for 6 weeks. The presence of SVA RNA was evaluated in all specimens collected by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) targeting a conserved region of the 5' untranslated region (5'-UTR). The serological response (IgG) to SVA was evaluated by the weekly testing of sow and piglet serum samples on a SVA VP1 recombinant protein (rVP1) indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The rVP1 ELISA detected seroconversion against SVA in clinically affected and non-clinically affected sows at early stages of the outbreak as well as maternal SVA antibodies in offspring. Overall, the absence of vesicles (gross lesions) in SVA-infected animals and the variability of RT-qPCR results among specimen type demonstrated that a diagnostic algorithm based on the combination of clinical observations, RT-qPCR in multiple diagnostic specimens, and serology are essential to ensure an accurate diagnosis of SVA.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Picornaviridae/isolation & purification , Serologic Tests/methods , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/epidemiology , Animals , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Feces/virology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Longitudinal Studies , Palatine Tonsil/virology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Serum/virology , Swine
4.
Can J Vet Res ; 86(2): 157-161, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35388225

ABSTRACT

Swine vesicular disease (SVD) is an infectious viral disease of pigs. The clinical symptoms of SVD are indistinguishable from other vesicular diseases. In countries free of vesicular diseases, rapid SVD diagnosis and differentiation from other vesicular diseases are essential. In this report, a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) was developed and validated to improve the current SVD serological diagnosis. In this cELISA, an anti-SVD monoclonal antibody (mAb) captures the recombinant SVD virus-like particle (SVD-VLP) antigen, and 5B7 mAb is used as a competitor to compete with polyclonal antibodies in SVD-positive sera. The cut-off value of the SVD-VLP based cELISA (SVD-VLP cELISA) is ≥ 65% inhibition (%). The determined diagnostic specificity was 99.2%. SVD-VLP cELISA successfully detected SVD antibodies in the sera of SVD-infected animals and produced a diagnostic sensitivity of 100%. A panel of SVD positive sere including outbreak samples (n = 11) and samples (n = 5) from experimentally inoculated pigs, were correctly identified as positive by the SVD-VLP cELISA. In terms of reducing false positives detected by the currently used cELISA (5B7 cELISA), the performance of SVD-VLP cELISA is comparable to the gold standard virus neutralization test.


La maladie vésiculeuse du porc (SVD) est une maladie virale infectieuse des porcs. Les symptômes cliniques de la SVD sont indiscernables des autres maladies vésiculaires. Dans les pays exempts de maladies vésiculaires, un diagnostic rapide de la SVD et une différenciation avec les autres maladies vésiculaires sont essentiels. Dans ce rapport, un test immuno-enzymatique compétitif (cELISA) a été développé et validé pour améliorer le diagnostic sérologique actuel de la SVD. Dans ce cELISA, un anticorps monoclonal anti-SVD (mAb) capture l'antigène recombinant de particules de type virus SVD (SVD-VLP), et le mAb 5B7 est utilisé comme compétiteur pour concurrencer les anticorps polyclonaux dans les sérums positifs pour la SVD. La valeur seuil du cELISA basé sur SVD-VLP (cELISA SVD-VLP) est ≥ 65 % d'inhibition (%). La spécificité diagnostique déterminée était de 99,2 %. SVD-VLP cELISA a détecté avec succès des anticorps SVD dans les sérums d'animaux infectés par SVD et a produit une sensibilité diagnostique de 100 %. Un panel de sérums positifs pour la SVD, comprenant des échantillons d'épidémie (n = 11) et des échantillons (n = 5) de porcs inoculés expérimentalement, a été correctement identifié comme positif par le cELISA SVD-VLP. En termes de réduction des faux positifs détectés par le cELISA actuellement utilisé (5B7 cELISA), les performances du cELISA SVD-VLP sont comparables au test de neutralisation du virus de référence.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).


Subject(s)
Swine Diseases , Swine Vesicular Disease , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Viral , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis
5.
Rev Sci Tech ; 29(3): 639-48, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21309461

ABSTRACT

At the end of 2006, a recrudescence of swine vesicular disease (SVD) was recorded in Italy and the disease spread widely throughout the northern regions. Lombardy, a densely populated pig area, was most affected and the presence of the disease caused heavy economic losses to the entire pig industry. Although SVD is considered only moderately contagious, the epidemic in the north was characterised by a rapid spread of the condition. Numerous difficulties were encountered in eradicating it. Over the past decade, there has been a significant increase in the population of pigs in Lombardy, concentrated mainly in a few areas which were the most severely affected during the 2006 to 2007 SVD epidemic. Increases in both the pig population and animal movements, combined with weak biosecurity measures, increased the spread rate of the disease and hampered eradication activities.


Subject(s)
Swine Vesicular Disease/transmission , Animals , Diagnosis, Differential , Italy/epidemiology , Population Growth , Swine , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/epidemiology
6.
Vopr Virusol ; 55(3): 44-7, 2010.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20608082

ABSTRACT

The study has shown the efficiency of a competitive ELISA (C-ELISA) variant or an indirect ELISA (I-ELUSA) in the detection of antibodies to swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) versus traditional assays, such as a microneutralization test, a blocking ELIDA test, and a the reference test Ceditest SVDV (Cedi-Diagnostics B.V., Netherlands). Specific antibodies in the pig sera could be detected by C-ELISA on days 4-5 and by I-ELISA on day 6 after experimental SVDV infection. Specific antibodies were detected in a contact pig 11 days after the beginning of the experiment.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enterovirus B, Human/isolation & purification , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Animals , Enterovirus B, Human/immunology , Swine , Swine Vesicular Disease/blood
7.
Vopr Virusol ; 55(4): 41-4, 2010.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20886713

ABSTRACT

An indirect ELISA (I-ELISA) has been developed for swine vesicular disease virus-specific antibody detection. The analytic sensitivity of I-ELISA testing of serum samples from experimentally infected pigs with the known VN titer was 2 log2. Its diagnostic specificity was demonstrated as 100% in 4485 swine serum samples from different regions of the Russian Federation.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enterovirus B, Human/isolation & purification , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibody Specificity , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Enterovirus B, Human/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine
8.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 67(1): 406-416, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31538404

ABSTRACT

Swine vesicular disease (SVD) is a contagious viral disease of pigs. The clinical signs of SVD are indistinguishable from other vesicular diseases, such as senecavirus A infection (SVA) and foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Rapid and accurate diagnostic tests of SVD are considered essential in countries free of vesicular diseases. Competitive ELISA (cELISA) is the serological test used routinely. However, although cELISA is the standard test for SVD antibody testing, this test produces a small number of false-positive results, which caused problems in international trade. The current project developed a SVD isotype antibody ELISA using recombinant SVD virus-like particles (VLP) and an SVD-specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) to reduce the percentage of false positives. The diagnostic specificities of SVD-VLP isotype ELISAs were 98.7% and 99.6% for IgM and IgG. The SVD isotype ELISAs were SVD-specific, without cross-reactivity to other vesicular diseases. A panel of 16 SVD-positive reference sera was evaluated using the SVD-VLP isotype ELISAs. All sera were correctly identified as positive by the two combined SVD-VLP isotype ELISAs. Comparison of the test results showed a high level of correlation between the SVDV antigen isotype ELISAs and SVD-VLP isotype ELISAs. 303 sera from animals lacking clinical signs and history of SVDV exposure were identified positive using SVD cELISA. These samples were examined using SVD-VLP isotype ELISAs. Of the 303 serum samples, five were positive for IgM, and five of 303 were positive for IgG. Comparable to virus neutralization test results, SVD isotype ELISAs significantly reduced the false-positive samples. Based on above test results, the combined use of cELISA and isotype ELISAs can reduce the number of false-positive samples and the use of time-consuming virus neutralization tests, with benefit for international trade in swine and related products.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Vaccines, Virus-Like Particle/immunology , Animals , Female , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mutation , Neutralization Tests/veterinary , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology
9.
Vet Microbiol ; 133(1-2): 145-53, 2009 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18621489

ABSTRACT

Definitive diagnosis of vesicular or vesicular-like lesions in livestock animals presents challenges both for veterinary clinicians and diagnostic laboratories. It is often impossible to diagnose the causative disease agent on a clinical basis alone and difficult to collect ample vesicular epithelium samples. Due to restrictions of time and sample size, once laboratory tests have ruled out foot-and-mouth disease, vesicular stomatitis and swine vesicular disease a definitive diagnosis may remain elusive. With the ability to test a small quantity of sample for a large number of pathogens simultaneously, DNA microarrays represent a potential solution to this problem. This study describes the application of a long oligonucleotide microarray assay to the identification of viruses known to cause vesicular or vesicular-like lesions in livestock animals. Eighteen virus isolates from cell culture were successfully identified to genus level, including representatives of each foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype, two species of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), swine vesicular disease virus, vesicular exanthema of swine virus (VESV), bovine herpesvirus 1, orf virus, pseudocowpox virus, bluetongue virus serotype 1 and bovine viral diarrhoea virus 1. VSV and VESV were also identified in vesicular epithelium samples, with varying levels of sensitivity. The results indicate that with further development this microarray assay could be a valuable tool for the diagnosis of vesicular and vesicular-like diseases.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/veterinary , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Vesicular Stomatitis/diagnosis , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/virology , DNA, Viral/chemistry , DNA, Viral/genetics , Female , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/pathology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , RNA, Viral/chemistry , RNA, Viral/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Diseases/pathology , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Vesicular Disease/pathology , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology , Vesicular Stomatitis/pathology , Vesicular Stomatitis/virology , Vesiculovirus/isolation & purification
10.
Pol J Vet Sci ; 12(1): 119-21, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19459449

ABSTRACT

Application of real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) for detection of swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) in samples of archival SVDV isolates and clinical samples collected from SVDV infected pigs was described. A primer set that targets the IRES region of the SVDV genome and TaqMan probe specific for a highly conserved region in SVDV RNA IRES region were used. The assay detected viral RNA in all tested archival strains of SVDV isolated in Europe during years 1972-73 and 1992 as well as in clinical samples collected from experimentally infected pigs. The rRT-PCR can provide quantitative and qualitative information and is more sensitive and faster to perform than the conventional RT-PCR.


Subject(s)
Enterovirus B, Human/isolation & purification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology , Animals , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis
11.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 66(1): 144-155, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30103262

ABSTRACT

Differential diagnosis of diseases that share common clinical signs typically requires the performance of multiple independent diagnostic tests to confirm diagnosis. Diagnostic tests that can detect and discriminate between multiple differential pathogens in a single reaction may expedite, reduce costs, and streamline the diagnostic testing workflow. Livestock haemorrhagic diseases like classical swine fever (CSF), African swine fever (ASF), and vesicular diseases, such as foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), vesicular stomatitis (VS), and swine vesicular disease (SVD) can have an enormous impact on the livestock industry and economy of countries that were previously free of the diseases. Thus, rapid diagnosis of these diseases is critical for disease control. Here, we describe the development and initial laboratory validation of a novel fully automated user-developed assay for simultaneous detection and differentiation of multiple viruses of veterinary importance in a single reaction with minimal user-intervention. The user only performs sample loading, placement of consumables and reagents, selection and initiation of assay while all other processes (i.e., nucleic acid extraction, multiplex RT-PCR, reverse dot blot detection and result reporting) are performed fully automated. The current assay has a turn-around time of approximately 6 hr and can simultaneously process up to 24 samples. The automated assay accurately and specifically detected 37 laboratory amplified strains of the five target viruses, including all seven serotypes of FMD virus, three genotypes of CSF virus, and two serotypes of VS virus. The assay also detected targeted viruses in a variety of clinical samples collected from infected animals, such as oral fluid, oral swab, nasal swab, whole blood, serum, as well as tonsil, spleen, kidney, and ileum. No cross-reactivity was observed with 15 nontarget viruses that affect livestock and samples from clinically healthy animals. To our knowledge, this is the first fully automated and integrated assay for simultaneous detection of multiple high consequence veterinary pathogens.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/veterinary , Epidemiological Monitoring/veterinary , Genome, Viral , Immunoblotting/veterinary , Microfluidics/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , African Swine Fever/diagnosis , Animals , Classical Swine Fever/diagnosis , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/instrumentation , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Immunoblotting/methods , Livestock , Microfluidics/instrumentation , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Swine , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Vesicular Stomatitis/diagnosis
12.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(3): 1081-9, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18216216

ABSTRACT

A high-throughput multiplexed assay was developed for the differential laboratory detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) from viruses that cause clinically similar diseases of livestock. This assay simultaneously screens for five RNA and two DNA viruses by using multiplexed reverse transcription-PCR (mRT-PCR) amplification coupled with a microsphere hybridization array and flow-cytometric detection. Two of the 17 primer-probe sets included in this multiplex assay were adopted from previously characterized real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays for FMDV. The diagnostic accuracy of the mRT-PCR assay was evaluated using 287 field samples, including 247 samples (213 true-positive samples and 35 true-negative samples) from suspected cases of foot-and-mouth disease collected from 65 countries between 1965 and 2006 and 39 true-negative samples collected from healthy animals. The mRT-PCR assay results were compared to those of two singleplex rRT-PCR assays, using virus isolation with antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as the reference method. The diagnostic sensitivity of the mRT-PCR assay for FMDV was 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.8 to 96.4%), and the sensitivity was 98.1% (95% CI, 95.3 to 99.3%) for the two singleplex rRT-PCR assays used in combination. In addition, the assay could reliably differentiate between FMDV and other vesicular viruses, such as swine vesicular disease virus and vesicular exanthema of swine virus. Interestingly, the mRT-PCR detected parapoxvirus (n = 2) and bovine viral diarrhea virus (n = 2) in clinical samples, demonstrating the screening potential of this mRT-PCR assay to identify viruses in FMDV-negative material not previously recognized by using focused single-target rRT-PCR assays.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease/diagnosis , Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease/virology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/virology , Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics , Microspheres , Parapoxvirus/isolation & purification , Poxviridae Infections/veterinary , Poxviridae Infections/virology , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology
13.
J Virol Methods ; 147(1): 188-93, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17920701

ABSTRACT

This report describes the development of a one-step reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay for the detection of swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV). The assay detects the virus rapidly, within 30-60 min and the result is visualised either by gel-electrophoresis or by the naked eye through the addition of SybrGreen. A collection of 28 SVDV isolates were tested positive, while heterologous viruses such as foot-and-mouth disease virus and vesicular stomatitis virus remained negative. The performance of the RT-LAMP was compared directly with real-time PCR using RNA from clinical samples including nasal swabs, serum and faeces. For nasal swabs and serum the sensitivity of the RT-LAMP was shown to be at least equivalent to real-time PCR. Interestingly, for faecal samples the RT-LAMP assay was shown to be even more sensitive than real-time PCR, possibly because it is less sensitive to inhibitory substances. This RT-LAMP assay provides a number of benefits for the diagnosis of SVD, since the assay is sensitive and rapid, and the isothermal amplification strategy used is not reliant upon expensive equipment it is particularly suited for "front line" diagnosis of SVD in modestly equipped laboratories, in field stations or in mobile diagnostic units.


Subject(s)
Enterovirus B, Human/isolation & purification , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Animals , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology
14.
J Virol Methods ; 147(2): 301-11, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17964668

ABSTRACT

A highly sensitive and specific one-step multiplex RT-PCR assay has been developed and standardised for the simultaneous and differential detection of the most important vesicular viruses affecting livestock: foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV), and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). The method uses three primer sets, each one specific for the corresponding virus, selected to detect of all serotypes of FMD and VS. The detection range was confirmed by examination of a collection of 31 isolates of the three target viruses. The specificity of the assay was also demonstrated by testing other related viruses, uninfected cell line cultures and healthy pig tissues. The testing of blood and serum samples from animals infected experimentally proved that the method can be useful for early diagnosis of the diseases, even before the first vesicular lesions are visualized in the infected pigs. An assessment of the performance of the multiplex RT-PCR was carried out using a panel of more than 100 samples from animals infected experimentally, showing the suitability of the method for a rapid (less than 6h), sensitive and specific differential diagnosis in clinical samples. Additionally, a uniplex RT-PCR for VSV, that amplifies the two viral serotypes, was also developed and tested as a rapid tool for the diagnosis of this vesicular disease.


Subject(s)
Enterovirus B, Human/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Vesicular Stomatitis/virology , Vesiculovirus/isolation & purification , Animals , Diagnosis, Differential , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology
15.
J Virol Methods ; 143(2): 200-6, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17451815

ABSTRACT

The World Organization for Animal Health (Office International des Epizooties, OIE) includes the diseases caused by foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV), and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), as "Diseases Notifiable to the OIE". Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreaks have severe economical as well as social effects and cannot be differentiated from the diseases caused by the other two viruses on the basis of clinical symptoms. Efficient laboratory techniques are therefore required for detection and identification of the viruses causing similar vesicular symptoms in swine. A rapid method is described using padlock probes and microarrays to detect simultaneously and differentiate the three viruses in a single reaction, as well as providing serotype information in cases of VSV infection. The padlock probe/microarray assay detected successfully and identified 39 cDNA samples of different origin representing the three viruses. The results were in complete agreement with identities and serotypes determined previously. This novel virus detection method is discussed in terms of usefulness and further development.


Subject(s)
Enterovirus B, Human/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Oligonucleotide Probes , Rhabdoviridae Infections/veterinary , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus/isolation & purification , Animals , Base Sequence , DNA Probes , Enterovirus B, Human/genetics , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , Rhabdoviridae Infections/diagnosis , Swine , Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus/genetics
16.
Dev Biol (Basel) ; 128: 103-12, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18084935

ABSTRACT

The highly contagious transboundary animal diseases (TADs), e.g., foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), classical swine fever (CSF), African swine fever (ASF) and highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) are regularly occurring and re-occurring on various continents, causing severe losses. This epidemiological situation indicates the urgent need for the development of powerful, robust and high capacity new diagnostic methods in order to detect and identify the causative agents very rapidly. This report is on the experiences of an OIE Collaborating Centre and those of the MULTIPLEX-PCR and the LAB-ON-SITE EU project consortia with the deveopment of novel methods for the improved molecular diagnosis of a range of viral diseases. Thermal amplification based real-time PCR methods (e.g.,TaqMan, Molecular Beacons, Primer-Probe Energy Transfer, and Light Upon eXtension (LUX) fluorogenic primers), and amplification without thermocycling have been elaborated for the improved diagnosis of TADs, such as FMD, swine vesicular disease, vesicular stomatitis, CSF, ASF, HPAI and Newcastle disease (ND). The simultaneous detection of various pathogens in a disease complex is facilitated by the development of multiplex PCR packages. By introducing nucleic acid extraction and pipetting robotics, together with the multi-channel real-time PCR machines, the molecular diagnostic procedures have become rapid, robust and automated. Quality control is strengthened by special precautions to avoid false positive and false negative results. By following the steps of OIE standardisation and validation, the diagnostic PCR assays have become nationally and nternationally standardised and harmonised. The development of additional methods, like padlock probes and microarrays, is further improving the arsenal of nucleic acid based novel molec ular diagnostic tests for TADs.


Subject(s)
Animal Diseases/diagnosis , International Agencies , Animal Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/trends , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/veterinary , Cooperative Behavior , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sweden , Swine , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Vesicular Stomatitis/diagnosis
17.
Rev Sci Tech ; 26(3): 585-93, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18293607

ABSTRACT

Swine vesicular disease (SVD) was first observed in Italy in 1966, and was initially diagnosed as foot and mouth disease (FMD). The causative agent of SVD was classified as an Enterovirus within the family Picornaviridae. It was included in the list of diseases notifiable to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) because of the similarity of its lesions to those produced by FMD; however SVD is often mild in nature and may infect pigs subclinically. During the last decade SVD has been persistently reported in Italy, and surveillance and eradication activities are in place. The central and northern parts of Italy have been designated SVD free since 1997, while the southern regions have not achieved disease-free status. However, occasional outbreaks of SVD have occurred in central and northern Italy and have been eradicated using rigorous control measures. Most recent SVD outbreaks in Italy have been subclinical; SVD can rarely be diagnosed now on the basis of clinical signs and it is necessary to use laboratory diagnosis. This paper examines the epidemiology of SVD in Italy, and considers the measures adopted in Europe for SVD control on the basis of current knowledge of the disease.


Subject(s)
Disease Notification , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Swine Vesicular Disease/epidemiology , Swine Vesicular Disease/prevention & control , Animals , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Enterovirus B, Human/isolation & purification , Female , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Sentinel Surveillance/veterinary , Swine , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis
18.
J Vet Sci ; 18(S1): 361-370, 2017 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28385002

ABSTRACT

Swine vesicular disease (SVD) is a highly contagious viral disease that causes vesicular disease in pigs. The importance of the disease is due to its indistinguishable clinical signs from those of foot-and-mouth disease, which prevents international trade of swine and related products. SVD-specific antibody detection via an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the most versatile and commonly used method for SVD surveillance and export certification. Inactivated SVD virus is the commonly used antigen in SVD-related ELISA. A recombinant SVD virus-like particle (VLP) was generated by using a Bac-to-Bac baculovirus expression system. Results of SVD-VLP analyses from electron microscopy, western blotting, immunofluorescent assay, and mass spectrometry showed that the recombinant SVD-VLP morphologically resemble authentic SVD viruses. The SVD-VLP was evaluated as a replacement for inactivated whole SVD virus in competitive and isotype-specific ELISAs for the detection of antibodies against SVD virus. The recombinant SVD-VLP assay produced results similar to those from inactivated whole virus antigen ELISA. The VLP-based ELISA results were comparable to those from the virus neutralization test for antibody detection in pigs experimentally inoculated with SVD virus. Use of the recombinant SVD-VLP is a safe and valuable alternative to using SVD virus antigen in diagnostic assays.


Subject(s)
Enterovirus B, Human , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Animals , Blotting, Western/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Fluorescent Antibody Technique/veterinary , Microscopy, Electron/veterinary , Serologic Tests/methods , Serologic Tests/veterinary , Swine , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology
19.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0146211, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26757142

ABSTRACT

Senecavirus A (SV-A), formerly, Seneca Valley virus (SVV), has been detected in swine with vesicular lesions and is thought to be associated with swine idiopathic vesicular disease (SIVD), a vesicular disease syndrome that lacks a defined causative agent. The clinical presentation of SIVD resembles that of other more contagious and economically devastating vesicular diseases, such as foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), swine vesicular disease (SVD), and vesicular stomatitis (VS), that typically require immediate rule out diagnostics to lift restrictions on animal quarantine, movement, and trade. This study presents the development of a sensitive, SYBR Green RT-qPCR assay suitable for detection of SV-A in diagnostic swine specimens. After testing 50 pigs with clinical signs consistent with vesicular disease, 44 (88%) were found to be positive for SV-A by RT-qPCR as compared to none from a negative cohort of 35 animals without vesicular disease, indicating that the assay is able to successfully detect the virus in an endemic population. SV-A RNA was also detectable at a low level in sera from a subset of pigs that presented with (18%) or without (6%) vesicular signs. In 2015, there has been an increase in the occurrence of SV-A in the US, and over 200 specimens submitted to our laboratory for vesicular investigation have tested positive for the virus using this method. SV-A RNA was detectable in all common types of vesicular specimens including swabs and tissue from hoof lesions, oral and snout epithelium, oral swabs, scabs, and internal organ tissues such as liver and lymph node. Genome sequencing analysis from recent virus isolates was performed to confirm target amplicon specificity and was aligned to previous isolates.


Subject(s)
Picornaviridae/isolation & purification , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology , Animals , Cattle , Electrophoresis, Agar Gel , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reproducibility of Results , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Swine , Temperature
20.
Rev Sci Tech ; 24(3): 1077-83, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16642776

ABSTRACT

After the swine vesicular disease (SVD) outbreaks in 1992 in the Netherlands a national monitoring programme was initiated, testing 12 samples from every pig farm three times per year. In this monitoring a slightly higher cut-off was used than the cut-off agreed on within the European community. The author has analysed the effect of this higher cut-off on the percentage of false positive and false negative results, using information on SVD antibody titres in sera obtained from the monitoring programme and the outbreaks in 1992 and 1994. The number of false positive results was reduced by 63% when using the higher cut-off. On average the test sensitivity was reduced from 100% to 88%, resulting in a change of the average herd sensitivity from 91.7% to 91.5%, when testing 12 samples per farm. When three samples per farm were tested, the average herd sensitivity changed from 64.9% to 62.9%. The results further indicate that, in contrast to what is generally presumed, there is a relationship between test sensitivity and the prevalence of infection. The results clearly show that sample size is far more important in obtaining a high herd sensitivity than achieving a high test sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Enterovirus B, Human/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Neutralization Tests/veterinary , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/epidemiology , Animals , Chi-Square Distribution , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Netherlands/epidemiology , Neutralization Tests/standards , Reference Values , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sentinel Surveillance/veterinary , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL