Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 165
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Can J Urol ; 31(4): 11950-11954, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39217519

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In May 2022, lawmakers in Oklahoma passed House Bill 4327, which outlawed abortion after fertilization. The governor signed the bill on May 25, 2022. It is uncertain whether these changes will motivate more men in Oklahoma to undergo vasectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Males seeking vasectomy were informed of the study and asked to participate. Participants filled out a survey regarding their marital status, number of children, fertility treatment history, and their influences in making the decision to pursue vasectomy. We removed the identifying information from the survey. After collection, the data was imported to a database. Medical records were investigated to confirm patients underwent the procedure. RESULTS: Of the 126 participants, 116 underwent vasectomy. Patients who did not undergo vasectomy tended to be older (38.4 vs. 34.2, p = 0.03). Participants who underwent vasectomy and were concerned about abortion laws tended to be married (69.7 vs. 30.3%, p = 0.04) with fewer children (1.2 vs. 2.3, p < 0.0001). When correlating specifically "concern about abortion laws" and going through with vasectomy, the risk ratio of 1.12 (95% CI 1.04, 1.20) indicates that patients concerned about abortion laws were slightly more likely to undergo vasectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Over 26% of men said that their decisions were somewhat impacted by abortion law changes. The concern about abortion law changes seemed to be predictive of patients undergoing vasectomy. Continued data collection will help determine whether there is a time-sensitive nature regarding the impact of abortion law changes on motivation to vasectomy.


Subject(s)
Motivation , Vasectomy , Humans , Vasectomy/legislation & jurisprudence , Vasectomy/psychology , Oklahoma , Male , Adult , Abortion, Induced/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Induced/psychology , Middle Aged
2.
BJU Int ; 128(5): 561-567, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33387391

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether it is possible to reduce the amount of pain and anxiety experienced during a vasectomy by use of two-dimensional (2D) video glasses or virtual reality (VR) glasses during the vasectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A non-randomised controlled trial was performed between October 2017 and March 2018. A total of 176 patients were planned for a vasectomy in an outpatient setting and 141 of these patients were divided sequentially into three groups: Control, 2D video glasses and VR glasses. Follow-up lasted 7 days. One patient was lost to follow-up. The main outcomes were pain (visual analogue scale [VAS] score 0-10) and anxiety ((VAS score 0-10), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults [STAI-AD] score 20-80) during the vasectomy. Data were compared using analysis of variance or chi-square measurements. RESULTS: No significant differences in pain were found (VAS score of 2 in all groups). The odds ratio (OR) and (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the 2D video glasses group was 1.15 (0.92-1.48) and in the VR group was 0.98 (0.76-1.26). Patients in the VR group experienced significantly more anxiety during the procedure (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.07-1.85). Also, patients without prior hospitalisation reported significantly more pain than patients with one or more hospitalisations (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.11-1.65). CONCLUSIONS: The VR and 2D video glasses did not reduce pain or stress during the vasectomy. In the VR group, the anxiety levels during the procedure were even higher.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/prevention & control , Pain, Procedural/prevention & control , Vasectomy/adverse effects , Virtual Reality , Adult , Eyeglasses , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Rate , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Motion Pictures , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Procedural/etiology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Vasectomy/psychology
3.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1228, 2020 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32787807

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vasectomy is one of the highly effective and non-reversible types of long-term family planning methods for men. Ethiopia has a limited number of studies on the use of vasectomy, and they are focused on men rather than married men. The current study was aimed to identify the intention to use vasectomy as a method of contraception among married men in the study setting. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from February 1 - April 30, 2018. A sample of 422 married men was recruited using a systematic random sampling method. We conducted face to face interviews with a structured questionnaire (i.e. closed-ended questions). Data were entered into Epi data version 3.1 and SPSS version 23 used for data analysis. The statistical association between the outcome variable (Intention to use vasectomy) and the explanatory variables were first tested with binary logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for confounding effect of each predictor. RESULTS: The study findings showed that the intention to use vasectomy as a method of family planning was reported as high (24%). About 34.8% of the respondents had good knowledge and nearly a quarter (23.2%) of them had a positive attitude toward the acceptance of vasectomy use. In multivariate analysis, age range between 30 and 39 years [AOR = 2.4, 95% CI = (1.16-4.82)], having good knowledge about vasectomy use [AOR = 6.22, 95% CI = (3.17-12.21)], and having a positive attitude toward vasectomy use [AOR = 7.81, 95% CI = (4.25-14.38)] were factors significantly associated to use vasectomy as compared to their counterparts. CONCLUSION: The level of acceptance of vasectomy (24%) was high compared to the level of its use in developing countries (i.e. if acceptability translates to use). The study revealed that age, good knowledge, and a positive attitude towards the use of vasectomy were important predictors of the intention to accept vasectomy. To further promote the use of vasectomy effective communication strategies in family planning programs are needed.


Subject(s)
Intention , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Vasectomy/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia , Family Planning Services/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Indian J Public Health ; 63(1): 10-14, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30880731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uttar Pradesh is the most populated state of the country having population of 199.581 million and total fertility rate of 3.3 (annual health survey [AHS] 2012-2013) with high fertile trajectory. Currently, female sterilization accounts for about 18.4% and male sterilization for 0.3% of all sterilizations in Uttar Pradesh (AHS 2012-2013). A strategy to promote men's involvement in effective birth control is needed to reduce the population growth. Since no scalpel vasectomy (NSV) is an easy method but still not being utilized; hence, the purpose of this research is to ascertain various factors of nonutilization of NSV. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is (i) to determine the barriers among married males for adopting NSV as a method of family planning, (ii) to determine the awareness about NSV, (iii) to suggest measures to increase uptake of NSV by the people. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out. A two-staged multistage random sampling technique was used. Lucknow is divided into eight Nagar Nigam zones. In the first stage, two urban slums from each geographical zone were selected randomly. In the second stage, from each selected slum a sample of 24 eligible households was selected at random to achieve the desired sample size. RESULTS: It was observed that among the study participants maximum 89.2% perceived Sociocultural barriers, while 0.6% of the participants perceived service delivery barriers. However, 14% of the participants also perceived procedure-related barriers as the most important cause for not accepting NSV. CONCLUSION: Measures should be taken to remove these barriers, and increase uptake of NSV.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Poverty Areas , Urban Population , Vasectomy/methods , Vasectomy/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cultural Characteristics , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
5.
Reprod Health ; 14(1): 21, 2017 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28178993

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advocacy for male involvement in family planning has been championed over the years after the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD). There are a few contraceptive methods for men, and vasectomy uptake has been identified as one of the indicators of male involvement in family planning. Vasectomy also known as male sterilization is a permanent form of contraception. It is a generally safe, quick, easy, effective surgical operation with rare complications to prevent release of sperm. The study explored the vasectomy perspectives of urban Ghanaian women. METHODS: A qualitative approach was used and five focus group discussions were held with women in urban Accra. The study was conducted in the five sub-metropolitan areas of the Accra Metropolitan Health Directorate from September-October 2013. Participants were adult and young adult women who are members of organized groups and unions. Data were analyzed manually after transcribing and coding and themes were sorted using thematic version 0.9. RESULTS: Both adult and young adult participants regarded vasectomy as an easy way for male partners to become promiscuous and cheat on them (women) because the operation renders males incapable of having a child; promiscuity could lead to the women contracting sexually transmitted infections including HIV/AIDS. They were also skeptical about vasectomy and the possibility that it could damage the sexual organs of their partners and affect their sexual relationships. The uptake of vasectomy will not benefit a new wife in case of divorce or death of a previous wife. Some women would allow their partners to undergo the procedure only if both of them will benefit health-wise and also if it would reduce the financial burden on the family. CONCLUSION: The women held mixed perceptions; both negative and positive views were shared on vasectomy uptake. The views were predominantly negative, and they regarded vasectomy as an unacceptable method of contraception. The women virtually had no reasons to encourage their partners to undergo a vasectomy. In order to increase vasectomy uptake in Ghana, innovative efforts to address the misconceptions and superstitions surrounding vasectomy should take centre stage; appropriate and targeted messaging during integrated health services delivery and social/health campaigns would be a good starting point.


Subject(s)
Contraception Behavior , Family Planning Services/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Vasectomy/psychology , Women/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Ghana , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Urban Population , Vasectomy/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
6.
Reprod Health ; 14(1): 54, 2017 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although vasectomy is effective and less expensive contraceptive method, only few men are using it in Africa. The main reason for low level use may be low knowledge about vasectomy among men. Only few studies tried to investigate level of knowledge of vasectomy among married men in Ethiopia. But these studies have limitations in measuring knowledge. This study was therefore designed to assess knowledge of vasectomy among married men in Dangila town. METHOD: A community based cross sectional study was conducted in Dangila town. Sample size was calculated using OpenEPI online sample size calculator for population based surveys. Multistage sampling technique was employed to recruit the study participants. Data collectors interviewed selected men using structured Amharic questionnaire from June to July, 2014. Two days training was given to data collectors and supervisors. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 16. Binary logistic regression analysis was done to identify determinants of knowledge about vasectomy. RESULT: A total of 872 men were interviewed. About 75% of men reported that they had ever heard about vasectomy. Men mentioned friends as main source of information for vasectomy. Among those who had ever heard, only 60.8% defined vasectomy correctly. About 20% defined vasectomy as "it is making the man impotent." Similarly about 16% equated vasectomy with castration. In this study, only 44.8% of men were knowledgeable about vasectomy. Married men who completed secondary education were 4.10(95%CI; 2.48 - 6.75) times more likely to be knowledgeable about vasectomy compared to those who did not attend formal education. Those who attended above secondary education were 5.73(95%CI 3.76 - 8.73) times more likely to be knowledgeable about vasectomy compared to those who did not attend formal education. CONCLUSION: Level of knowledge about vasectomy among married men in Dangla town was low and educational status was an important predictor of knowledge about vasectomy. Efforts are needed to improve knowledge of men about vasectomy. In addition, encouraging boys to complete secondary education may help improve knowledge of men about vasectomy.


Subject(s)
Contraception , Educational Status , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Vasectomy , Adult , Contraception/psychology , Contraception/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Marriage/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Vasectomy/education , Vasectomy/psychology , Vasectomy/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
7.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad ; 28(2): 323-326, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28718551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Men's attitude is very important in the adoption of methods of contraception and limiting the family size. Men represent half the world's population, but account for less than onethird of contraceptive use. Knowledge of men about vasectomy as contraceptive method is also limited. The objectives of the study were to assess the knowledge of males about vasectomy in age group 25-50 years and to identify the factors affecting the knowledge of men regarding vasectomy. METHODS: It was cross-sectional descriptive study. All the clients coming for vasectomy at Lahore General Hospital and Family Health Hospital were included in the study. Data was collected through questionnaire, which was entered in to computer using SPSS-17. Confidentiality of the data was ensured and verbal consent was obtained before data collection. RESULTS: Majority (85.6%) of the men had adequate knowledge about vasectomy. Major source of knowledge, motivation and decision making regarding vasectomy were healthcare providers followed by friends and colleagues. Socio-demographic factors like age of the wife, education of men, income of men, media, friends and relatives showed association with knowledge about vasectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all the respondents had formal education. Majority of the respondents had knowledge about vasectomy. Respondents acquired knowledge from health personnel, television, radio, newspapers, spouses and friends/colleagues. Misconception of the general population regarding vasectomy needs to be cleared and men should be involved actively in family planning programs. Health education program should be held at community level to educate people about the utilization of procedure.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Men/psychology , Vasectomy/psychology , Vasectomy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Education , Humans , Male , Marriage , Middle Aged
8.
J Sex Med ; 12(9): 1905-10, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26272461

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Men who are considering vasectomy as a means of contraception may have significant anxiety about their future sexual potency. As a result, couples may choose other forms of contraception with lower efficacy. AIM: We sought to determine the relationship between vasectomy and the frequency of sexual intercourse. METHODS: We analyzed data from cycles 6 (2002) to 7 (2006-2008) of the National Survey of Family Growth to compare the frequency of sexual intercourse of men who had undergone vasectomy with men who had not. Analysis was performed using data from male and female responders, and excluded men who had never had sex and those below age 25. We constructed a multivariate logistic regression model to adjust for demographic, socioeconomic, reproductive, and health factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was the sexual frequency in the last 4 weeks. RESULTS: Among male responders, a total of 5838 men met criteria for our study; 353 had undergone vasectomy. For vasectomized men, the average frequency of sexual intercourse was 5.9 times per month compared with 4.9 times for nonvasectomized men. After adjusting for age, marital status, race, education, health, body mass index, children, and income, vasectomized men had an 81% higher odds (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-201%) of having intercourse at least once a week compared with nonvasectomized men. A total number of 5211 female respondents reported 670 of their partners had undergone vasectomy. For partners of vasectomized men, the average frequency of intercourse was 6.3 times per month, compared with 6.0 times for partners of nonvasectomized men. After adjustment, women with vasectomized partners had a 46% higher odds (95% CI 5-103%) of having sexual intercourse at least once a week compared with women with nonvasectomized partners (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Vasectomy is not associated with decreased sexual frequency. This finding may be helpful to couples as they consider contraceptive options.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/etiology , Coitus , Contraception/psychology , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/etiology , Vasectomy/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Self Report , Sexual Behavior , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/diagnosis
9.
Natl Med J India ; 27(6): 311-3, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26133326

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Only 0.7% of men participate in the sterilization programme in Tamil Nadu. Various strategies were adopted to achieve a target of 10%. We aimed to assess the motivational strategies adopted by the health staff of Sathya Vijayanagaram block of Thiruvannamalai district in Tamil Nadu to improve the acceptance of non-scalpel vasectomy among the beneficiaries and to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of the acceptors of the technique. METHODS: This qualitative study, conducted in November-December 2010, involved in-depth interviews of the health staff of Cheyyar Health Unit district. All those who accepted non-scalpel vasectomy between 2007 and 2010 were interviewed. RESULTS: Early identification of targets and sustained motivation through a team approach, supported by administrative arrangements and intense information-education-communication activities, resulted in non-scalpel vasectomy contributing to 13% of all sterilizations. Acceptors were men from lower socioeconomic strata. CONCLUSION: The strategies adopted by the health system have contributed to the acceptance of non-scalpel vasectomy in the remote villages of a block in Tamil Nadu. This endeavour may be replicated in other districts of Tamil Nadu and others states of India to achieve the goals set for population control.


Subject(s)
Vasectomy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , India , Male , Motivation , National Health Programs , Qualitative Research , Vasectomy/psychology
10.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue ; 20(2): 138-41, 2014 Feb.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24520665

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the life quality of men after surgical sterilization. METHODS: We investigated the incidence of psychosomatic reactions, their influential factors and the quality of life among 740 men after surgical sterilization. We also evaluated the effectiveness of mental intervention for those with psychosomatic reactions. RESULTS: Totally, 59 (8%) of the subjects were not satisfied with their life status, including 42 (5.67%) suffering from psychosomatic reactions, and their psychosomatic reactions were related to their education background, economic status and understanding of sterilization. After 2 - 24 months of mental intervention, 34 (80.95%) of the 42 cases were cured, 6 (14.29%) relieved, and 2 (4.76%) unimproved. CONCLUSION: Mental intervention is effective for psychosomatic reactions in men after surgical sterilization.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Vasectomy/psychology , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period
11.
Fr J Urol ; 34(9): 102672, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936777

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vasectomy is a permanent contraceptive method that is increasingly appealing to French men with diverse patient profiles. An important question is the impact on sexual life. We aimed to specify the profile of men seeking vasectomy and its impact on their lives. METHOD: Based on a consecutive series of 446 men undergoing vasectomy at a university center between April 2010 and March 2022, an online survey was launched in April 2022. In total, 177 patients responded to the questionnaire. The median time between surgery and questionnaire response was 33months (15, 50). At the time of vasectomy, the main age group was 36-45years (55%). RESULTS: The reflection period before consultation exceeded 1year for 69%. At the time of surgery, only 8% of men were single and 18% were childless. Vasectomy was a couple's decision in 45% of cases. The main motivation was the shift in contraceptive burden for 76% of patients. Harmony in the couple was unchanged for 58% and improved for 33%. Libido remained stable for 79% and improved for 13%; 97% of men reported being satisfied with having undergone vasectomy; 96% had no regrets about surgery; 98% never considered having corrective surgery, and 99% never had a childbearing plan after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Men increasingly share contraceptive burden. Vasectomy has no significant deleterious impact on sexual life. Satisfaction is high, and the vast majority of men undergoing vasectomy have no regret of their decision. Consequently, vasectomy should continue to expand in France.


Subject(s)
Vasectomy , Humans , Vasectomy/psychology , Vasectomy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , France/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Female , Patient Satisfaction
12.
Med Anthropol Q ; 27(1): 23-42, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23674321

ABSTRACT

This article interrogates the modes by which cultural constructions of male contraceptive use emerge in Costa Rica by analyzing men's narratives of vasectomy. Drawing on ethnographic research data, I examine men's contraceptive decision making and perspectives on vasectomy and specify the ways they work through their vasectomy to rearticulate the relationship between masculinity and contraceptive responsibility and tensions in an emerging Costa Rican social modernity. Following Oudshoorn's (2003) analysis on male contraceptive research, this article highlights contraceptive technologies and men's narratives of these technologies as key sites for examining gender politics in contemporary societies and the materialization of new social orders. In the discussion, I argue that the men's narratives examined here potentiate creation of an "alternative technosociality" (Oudshoorn 2003) in Costa Rica, in which men taking contraceptive responsibility does not constitute performing a subordinate masculinity, but simply another way of acting as men.


Subject(s)
Masculinity , Men/psychology , Vasectomy/psychology , Anthropology, Medical , Costa Rica , Female , Humans , Male , Narration , Safe Sex/ethnology
13.
East Afr Med J ; 90(3): 89-94, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26866107

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nigeria with a growth rate of 28%, accounts for over two thirds of the West African population. It also has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the world with contraceptive prevalence among married couples less than 10%. Despite its safety and efficacy vasectomy appears to be unpopular in our environment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the perception and acceptance of married men and women towards vasectomy and the influence of the spouse on the man's decision to accept or reject vasectomy. DESIGN: A cross sectional questionnaire based study. SETTING: With an estimated population of 20 million, Lagos is the most cosmopolitan and urbanised city in Nigeria and accounts for 65% of all commercial activities in the country. Virtually all the tribes in Nigeria are represented in the city. SUBJECTS: Literate pregnant women recruited from the antenatal clinics and literate new fathers. All subjects were recruited from three health facilities in the Lagos metropolis. RESULTS: Twenty seven point five and twenty one percent of the men and women respectively had a good Knowledge of vasectomy while 49.1% and 19% of all men and women respectively with good knowledge would accept vasectomy (or agree for their spouses to have the procedure). Overall acceptance rates for men and women were 26 and 13.5% respectively while 92% of men who can opt for vasectomy will only do so if their spouses agree. Knowledge about vasectomy was the strongest single factor influencing the acceptance of vasectomy (p= 0.013) with stronger correlation among men than women (p=0.005 vrs p=.0.023). CONCLUSION: Knowledge and acceptance of vasectomy is significantly better in males than female Nigerians living in Lagos.


Subject(s)
Contraception Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Vasectomy , Adult , Attitude to Health , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Nigeria/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Sex Factors , Spouses/psychology , Spouses/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vasectomy/psychology , Vasectomy/statistics & numerical data
14.
Int Nurs Rev ; 57(2): 254-9, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20579162

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe some of the characteristics of men who underwent a vasectomy in the public health network of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: A descriptive study including 202 men randomly selected from a list of all the men vasectomized between 1998 and 2004 in the public health network. RESULTS: Most of the men were 30 years of age or older when vasectomized, had completed elementary school and had two or more children of both sexes. Most of the men came from the lowest income segment of the population: 47.6% in 1998-1999 and 61.3% in 2003-2004. Although the men knew various contraceptive methods, 51.2% reported that their partners were using combined oral contraceptives at the time of surgery. Most men initially sought information on vasectomy at health-care clinics where care was provided by a multidisciplinary team; most received counselling, however, 47.9% of the men waited more than 4 months for the vasectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The profile of the vasectomized men in this study appears to indicate that the low-income population from Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil has access to vasectomy; however, the waiting time for vasectomy reveals that difficulties exist in obtaining this contraceptive method in the public health service.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Public Health Practice/statistics & numerical data , Urban Health Services/organization & administration , Vasectomy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Characteristics , Family Planning Services/organization & administration , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Care Team , Patient Education as Topic , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Public Health Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Time Factors , Vasectomy/education , Vasectomy/legislation & jurisprudence , Vasectomy/psychology , Waiting Lists
15.
Ginecol Obstet Mex ; 78(4): 226-31, 2010 Apr.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20939229

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Men have few effective methods for birth control. The surgical method vasectomy is highly safe and effective, although in Mexico represents only 2.4% of all contraceptive methods used. OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics, complications and results of the men who requested and underwent no-scalpel vasectomy in the Instituto Nacional de Perinatología Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes, in México. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective cohort study with data of clinical records of men who underwent no-scalpel vasectomy from 2003 to 2007. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, and complications reported as well as espermatobioscopy data were included. Descriptive analysis was performed of different variables and chi squared test between proportions. RESULTS: A total of 596 no-scalpel vasectomies were performed. The average age was 36.5 years and 13.4 of schooling, 86.9% were married with 9.6 years of union. Socioeconomic status was as follows: medium (25%), middle high (20.1%), and high (24.7%). The 94.3% of men requested the no-scalpel vasectomy because of satisfied fertility and 5.7% by morbidity in his couple. The complications were as follows: epididymitis (2.2%), mild haematoma (1.5%) and contact dermatitis (0.2%). The surgical complications were significantly more frequent for the group with varicocele compared with the normal men group (p < 0.05). Azoospermia was achieved in 99.1% of men at 18 weeks after the no-scalpel vasectomy. Early recanalization occurred in 0.5% of men. There were no pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: The profile of men who requested no-scalpel vasectomy was in a great proportion healthy, in the fourth decade of life, with high school or greater, satisfied fertility and high socioeconomic status. No-scalpel vasectomy is a method of fertility planning very effective with low morbidity.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Vasectomy/methods , Adult , Cohort Studies , Contraception/methods , Contraception/psychology , Educational Status , Epididymitis/epidemiology , Hematoma/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Marriage , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Sperm Count , Varicocele/complications , Vasectomy/instrumentation , Vasectomy/psychology
16.
PLoS One ; 15(3): e0230045, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32196511

ABSTRACT

Despite being a reliable and cost effective family planning method, vasectomy remains underutilized in many low resource settings such as East Africa. We explored rural women's perceptions and beliefs regarding barriers to vasectomy use in the low resource setting of Pwani, Tanzania. The qualitative study used in-depth semi-structured interviews to obtain data. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 20 married/cohabiting women with two or more children. Thematic analysis guided the data analysis, with qualitative data reporting informed by COREQ guidelines. Most participants were Muslim and had between two and six children. Most had completed primary-level education and were engaged in small-scale farming. We extracted three main themes with associated sub-themes:1) lack of education, which included men's education levels and inadequate knowledge and misinformation 2) religious beliefs, social pressure and stigma, which included community stigma and the belief that vasectomy was not good for men with multiple wives; and 3) promoting men's involvement in family planning which included educating men and the women's perceived role in promoting vasectomy. Participating women perceived vasectomy uptake to be affected by a lack of low knowledge (among men, women, and the community), misinformation, and various sociocultural barriers. Efforts to promote vasectomy and male involvement in reproductive health services should be directed to addressing deeply-rooted sociocultural barriers. Women may have an essential role in encouraging their partners' vasectomy uptake. In addition, engaging couples in family planning education is critical to enhance knowledge. Ideally, such community based education should be conducted in partnership with communities and healthcare providers.


Subject(s)
Culture , Family Planning Services/statistics & numerical data , Health Education , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Social Change , Social Stigma , Vasectomy/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Rural Population , Young Adult
17.
Urology ; 136: 142-145, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843622

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether men who were childless at the time of vasectomy sought consultation for fertility restoration. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed to determine if patients without children at the time of vasectomy sought consultation for fertility restoration (defined as vasectomy reversal or sperm retrieval). If the patient had not been seen in our healthcare system within the previous 12 months, he was contacted by phone to determine whether he had sought consultation for fertility restoration. RESULTS: Of 1656 men, 68 men (4.1%) were childless at the time of vasectomy. Fifteen patients were excluded as they were not followed in our hospital system and were unreachable by phone. Zero patients sought consultation for fertility restoration. CONCLUSION: Our single institution study demonstrated that no men who were childless at the time of vasectomy sought consultation for fertility restoration. Given that there are no other FDA approved methods for nonbarrier sterilization for males, men with no children at the time of vasectomy should receive the same AUA guideline-recommended counseling that men with children receive.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Sperm Retrieval/psychology , Vasectomy/psychology , Vasovasostomy/psychology , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
18.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(37): e22149, 2020 Sep 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925772

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Unintended pregnancy is popular all over the world, accounting for 40% to 50% of all pregnancies. The condition not only exerts pressure on the relationship of couples and severely impacts the quality of life, but also imposes a heavy burden on the health of women and child. Recently, more than 220 million couples have chosen to be sterilized to obtain contraception, 47.3% of married couples select sterilization, of which vasectomy accounts for 17.1%. Vasectomy is currently the most convenient and effective method of male contraception. We will perform the systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the correlation between vasectomy and male sex dysfunction and provide evidence-based evidence for the couple METHODS:: The electronic databases of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.org., China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Wan fang Database, China Biology Medicine Database (CBM), VIP Science Technology Periodical Database, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, and Cochrane Library will be retrieved before November 20, 2021. We will search English literature and Chinese literature with proper Medical Subject Heading or text key words. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0 will be used for Systematic review and Meta-analysis. This protocol reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement, and we will report the systematic review by following the PRISMA statement. CONCLUSION AND DISSEMINATION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vasectomy on the sexual function of patients after operation. The results will be published in a public issue journal to provide evidence-based medical evidence for urologists and andrologists to make clinical decisions. REGISTRATION INFORMATION: INPLASY202080014.


Subject(s)
Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/etiology , Vasectomy/adverse effects , Vasectomy/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Postoperative Complications , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design
19.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0238293, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32881873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vasectomy is one of the most effective and permanent male contraceptive methods, and involves cutting and ligating the vas deferens to make the semen free of sperm during ejaculation. Although it is effective, simple, and safe, it is not well known and practiced in the majority of our community. This study assessed the intention to use vasectomy and its associated factors among married men in Debre Tabor Town, North West Ethiopia, 2019. METHODS: A community- based cross-sectional study was conducted among 402 married men from March 05 to April 15, 2019. A simple random sampling technique was employed to select the study participants. Data was collected by face to face interview using a structured and pre-tested questionnaire. Questions concerned socio-demographic and reproductive variables and views on vasectomy. The association between variables was analyzed using a bivariable and multivariable logistic regression model. RESULT: A total of 402 participants were included with a response rate of 98.75%. The mean participant age was 37.12(SD ± 6.553) years with the age range of 20-56 years. The prevalence of intention to use vasectomy was 19.6% with 95%CI (15.6%-23.4%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that age from 30-39 years (AOR = 3.2(95% CI: 1.19-8.86)), having more than three living children (AOR = 2.5(95% CI: 1.41-4.68)), good knowledge (AOR = 3.4(95%CI: 1.88-6.40)) and positive attitude (AOR = 4.8(95% CI: 2.61-8.80)) of married men were significantly associated with intention to use vasectomy. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Intention to use vasectomy was comparable with findings in four regions of Ethiopia (Amhara, Oromia, SNNP, and Tigray). Age, the number of living children, knowledge, and attitude were significantly associated with the intention to use vasectomy. Improving the level of knowledge and attitude towards vasectomy is an essential strategy to scale up the intention of men to use vasectomy.


Subject(s)
Contraception/psychology , Vasectomy/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Ethiopia , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
20.
Lab Anim ; 43(4): 357-61, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19535390

ABSTRACT

As the production of transgenic mice increases, the need for vasectomized mice also increases. Currently, there is no accurate method of identifying pain in these mice which can be used routinely and therefore no acceptable analgesic regimens can be established. Sixteen male CBA/CaCrl and 16 male DBA/2JCrl mice were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups (saline, low, medium and high dose oral paracetamol) and then underwent abdominal vasectomy. Their behaviour was videotaped (filmed) preoperatively and at one hour postoperatively and the data were analysed using an automated system - HomeCageScan. HomeCageScan detected significant changes in 16 behaviours following vasectomy. Such behaviours included twitching, rearing and grooming with varying levels of significance between the strains. No significant effects of drug treatment in any of the behaviours analysed by HomeCageScan were detected in the postoperative observation period. Strain-specific changes do occur in behaviour following abdominal vasectomy and HomeCageScan is capable of detecting these changes. The use of orally administered paracetamol was deemed to be an ineffective analgesic for CBA/CaCrl and DBA/2JCrl mice undergoing vasectomy.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Pain/veterinary , Surgery, Veterinary/methods , Vasectomy/veterinary , Administration, Oral , Animals , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred CBA , Mice, Inbred DBA , Pain/prevention & control , Species Specificity , Vasectomy/methods , Vasectomy/psychology , Videotape Recording/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL