Social media use and vision impairment in adults between the ages of 18 and 35 years in India.

SIGNIFICANCE: Social media is used by >4.48 billion people worldwide. Despite its popularity, vision-impaired individuals struggle to use social media given visual inaccessibility of content and lack of access to Internet/Wireless-Fidelity-enabled devices. Our study explores visually impaired adult's use of social media in comparison to a control group. PURPOSE: This study aimed to report the demographic profile and patterns of social media use among adults with vision impairment (VI) aged 18 to 35 years and compare it with an age-matched normally sighted group in India. In addition, we explored barriers to use of social media among adults with VI. METHODS: Vision-impaired and normally sighted adults (controls) aged 18 to 35 years at L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India, answered a questionnaire about social media use (e.g., platform used). RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-two individuals (201 VI, 221 controls) participated. Normally sighted adults (98%) used social media more than the VI group (81%; p<0.001). Vision-impaired users were predominantly male (85%) and unemployed (57%; p<0.00001 for both). There was no significant difference in educational level between groups (p=0.17). Smartphones were the most popular device used (VI, 161 [99%]; control, 206 [95%]), with tablet PC/iPad being the least popular (VI, 5 [3%]; control, 12 [6%]). Adults with VI and controls commonly used WhatsApp as communication platforms, and Facebook and Twitter as networking platforms. Approximately one-third of individuals across both social media user groups reported barriers to use (VI, 48 [30%]; control, 74 [34%]; p<0.001). Vision-impaired individuals cited accessibility issues of having to rely on audio over vision to navigate social media, whereas controls reported having to share a phone. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of social media usage among VI adults is high (81%) and is substantially higher than the 33% reported in the general Indian population. Vision-impaired adults who used social media were male with moderate VI and were less likely to be employed compared with controls.

Uncorrected Refractive Error in the African American Eye Disease Study.

Importance: Refractive error remains the largest cause of correctable visual impairment in the US. Correction of refractive error will reduce visual impairment and its associated morbidity but also improve quality of life and productivity. Objective: To determine the burden of and risk factors (RFs) associated with any uncorrected refractive error (UCRE) and unmet refractive need (URN) in a population-based sample of African American adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study, conducted from April 2014 to April 2018, included a population-based sample of self-identified African American participants 40 years and older from 30 contiguous census tracts in Inglewood, California. Participants underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and an in-home-administered questionnaire to assess sociodemographic, lifestyle, biological, medical, and health care and eye care usage RFs associated with UCRE and URN. Measurements of visual acuity (VA) were performed using a standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. Noncycloplegic automated refraction with supplemental subjective refraction was performed. UCRE was defined as an improvement of 2 or more lines with refraction in the better-seeing eye. URN was defined as an improvement of 2 or more lines with refraction in the better-seeing eye in those persons who were visually impaired. Sex- and age-specific burden of UCRE and URN were calculated, and multiple regression analyses were used to identify independent RFs. Study data were analyzed from May 2018 to December 2023. Exposures: Presence or absence of correctable refractive error. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported sex- and age-specific prevalence of and risk indicators of UCRE and URN. Results: Of the 7957 eligible participants in the African American Eye Disease Study (AFEDS), 6347 (80%) completed both the in-home interview and the clinical examination. Of these, 6337 participants (mean [SD] age, 61 [11] years; 3997 female [63%]) with complete refractive error data were included in the analysis. Refractive error-related correctable visual impairment was present in over two-thirds of participants with visual impairment (68.7%). The overall prevalence of any UCRE was 14.6% (925 of 6337), and the overall prevalence of any URN was 5.4% (URN1 [those with presenting VA of worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye but who could achieve 20/40 or better with correction], 157 of 2893; URN2 [those with presenting VA of worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye but who could achieve an improvement of 2 or more lines with refractive correction], 155 of 2891). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cross-sectional study suggest a high burden of refractive error-associated correctable refractive error in African American adults, making it the leading cause of visual impairment in this population. Providing universal coverage for vision care and prescription glasses is an affordable and achievable health care intervention that could reduce the burden of visual impairment in African American adults by over two-thirds and likely raise the quality of life and work productivity, especially in this vulnerable minority population.

Digital Technology Use Among Older Adults With Vision Impairment.

Importance: Telehealth has the potential to improve health for older adults, but many access disparities exist, including for those with vision impairment (VI). Objective: To examine the associations between VI and digital technology access measures in US older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study that included Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. Beneficiary data were obtained from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) 2021; data collection was conducted from June 2020 through January 2021. Data were analyzed September 2023. Exposure: VI, measured on categorical (distance and near VI [>0.30 logMAR], contrast sensitivity impairment [CSI; <1.55 logCS], and any VI [distance VI, near VI, or CSI]), and continuous (distance and near acuity [logMAR] and contrast sensitivity [logCS]) scales. Main Outcomes: Self-reported outcomes of digital technology access from the technological environment component of the NHATS. Results: Of the 2822 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [5.6] years; 1605 female [54.7%]) included in this study, patients self-identified with the following race and ethnicity categories (weighted percentages): 575 non-Hispanic Black (8.0%), 132 Hispanic (7.0%), 2019 non-Hispanic White (81.7%), and 63 non-Hispanic other race (3.4%), which included American Indian, Alaska Native, Asian, multiracial, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, or other specified race. A total of 1077 of 2822 patients (32.3%) had any VI. In multivariable logistic regression models, older adults with any VI had lower odds of having or knowing how to use a cellphone (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.88), computer (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79), or tablet (OR, 0.68, 95% CI = 0.54-0.85) than peers without VI. In other models, near VI was associated with lower odds of having and knowing how to use a phone (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87), computer (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75), or tablet (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81) compared with no near VI. CSI was associated with lower odds of having and knowing how to use a phone (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99) or computer (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93) compared with no CSI. Distance VI was only associated with lower odds of having and knowing how to use a cellphone (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95). Any VI and individual categorical VI measures were not associated with other outcomes of digital health- and nonhealth-related experiences. Similar associations were noted when vision was examined on a continuous scale. However, worse distance acuity (per 0.1 logMAR) was associated with being less likely to visit with family or friends on a video call (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98) and to order or refill prescriptions online (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest that older US adults with VI were less likely to have access to digital technology than peers without VI, although no differences were noted in the report of digital health- and nonhealth-related activities. These findings highlight the potential for inequities that may arise in telehealth for older adults with VI and the necessity to develop strategies to improve accessibility of telemedicine for all.

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and American Community Survey Estimates of Vision Difficulty Prevalence.

Importance: Inconsistent estimates of self-reported vision impairment across survey sources may cause confusion about the true size of the population with vision problems. Objective: To explain why the American Community Survey (ACS) and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) produce different prevalence estimates for self-reported vision problems in the US, despite using the same question wording. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the 2021 ACS and BRFSS using subgroup analysis and decomposition. Respondents were from 49 states and the District of Columbia. Included in the analysis were a civilian noninstitutionalized population 18 years and older. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to October 2023. Intervention: Aspects of sample design and composition. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported vision problems. Results: This study included a weighted sample of 2.8 million individuals (median [IQR] age, 47.7 [32.8-63.1] years; 51% male). The estimate of self-reported vision problems prevalence from the BRFSS (4.89%; 95% CI, 4.73%-5.04%) was 1.7 times as high as the estimate from the ACS (2.95%; 95% CI, 2.92%-2.97%) for similarly defined populations. If the BRFSS sample were weighted to align with the composition of other disability types in the ACS, the prevalence of vision problems would be 3.67% (95% CI, 3.53%-3.80%), closing about 63% of the gap between survey estimates. Conclusion and Relevance: Results of this survey study suggest that the focus on health may be associated with the higher prevalence in the BRFSS through differential nonresponse or question priming. Differences in other survey operations including frame construction, proxy reporting, and imputation had little impact.

Sight impairment registration in Trinidad: trend in causes and population coverage in comparison to the National Eye Survey of Trinidad and Tobago.

BACKGROUND: Little was known about the population coverage and causes of sight impairment (SI) registration within the Caribbean, or the extent to which register studies offer insights into population eye health. METHODS: We compared causes of SI registration in the Trinidad and Tobago Blind Welfare Association (TTBWA) register with findings from the 2014 National Eye Survey of Trinidad and Tobago (NESTT), and estimated registration coverage. Cross-sectional validation studies of registered clients included interviews, visual function and cause ascertainment in July 2013, and interviews and visual function in July 2016. RESULTS: The TTBWA register included 863 people (all ages, 48.1%(n = 415) male) registered between 1951 and 2015. The NESTT identified 1.1%(75/7158) people aged ≥5years eligible for partial or severe SI registration, of whom 49.3%(n = 37) were male. Registration coverage was approximately 7% of the eligible population of Trinidad. Nevertheless, there was close agreement in the causes of SI comparing the register and population-representative survey. Glaucoma was the leading cause in both the register (26.1%,n = 225) and population-based survey (26.1%, 18/69 adults), followed by cataract and diabetic retinopathy. In the validation studies combined, 62.6%(93/151) clients had severe SI, 28.5%(43/151) had partial SI and 9.9%(15/151) did not meet SI eligibility criteria. SI was potentially avoidable in at least 58%(n = 36/62) adults and 50%(n = 7/14) children. CONCLUSION: We report very low register coverage of the SI population, but close agreement in causes of SI to a contemporaneous national population-based eye survey, half of which resulted from preventable or treatable eye disease.

Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by diabetic retinopathy: a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate global and regional trends from 2000 to 2020 of the number of persons visually impaired by diabetic retinopathy and their proportion of the total number of vision-impaired individuals. METHODS: Data from population-based studies on eye diseases between 1980 to 2018 were compiled. Meta-regression models were performed to estimate the prevalence of blindness (presenting visual acuity <3/60) and moderate or severe vision impairment (MSVI; <6/18 to ≥3/60) attributed to DR. The estimates, with 95% uncertainty intervals [UIs], were stratified by age, sex, year, and region. RESULTS: In 2020, 1.07 million (95% UI: 0.76, 1.51) people were blind due to DR, with nearly 3.28 million (95% UI: 2.41, 4.34) experiencing MSVI. The GBD super-regions with the highest percentage of all DR-related blindness and MSVI were Latin America and the Caribbean (6.95% [95% UI: 5.08, 9.51]) and North Africa and the Middle East (2.12% [95% UI: 1.55, 2.79]), respectively. Between 2000 and 2020, changes in DR-related blindness and MSVI were greater among females than males, predominantly in the super-regions of South Asia (blindness) and Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Oceania (MSVI). CONCLUSIONS: Given the rapid global rise in diabetes and increased life expectancy, DR is anticipated to persist as a significant public health challenge. The findings emphasise the need for gender-specific interventions and region-specific DR healthcare policies to mitigate disparities and prevent avoidable blindness. This study contributes to the expanding body of literature on the burden of DR, highlighting the need for increased global attention and investment in this research area.

Prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in a coastal region of Southern India: A cross-sectional survey in Prakasam district, Andhra Pradesh.

PURPOSE: To estimate the magnitude, determinants, and causes of visual impairment (VI) and blindness among people >40 years. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, 2,968 people >40 years from 34 clusters were examined. A cluster random sampling method with a compact segment sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Prevalence of any VI (presenting visual acuity (PVA) <6/12 in better eye), severe VI (PVA <6/60 - 3/60), and blindness (PVA <3/60 in better eye) were expressed as percentage with 95% confidence interval. Logistic regression was performed to determine the risk factors associated with blindness. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 54.6 years (Standard deviation ± 11.2 years). The prevalence of mild, moderate, and severe visual impairment was 14.2% (12.95-15.49), 13.7% (12.46-14.97), and 0.7% (0.47-1.12), respectively. The prevalence of blindness was 1.3% (0.94-1.79, n = 39). The overall prevalence of VI (presenting Visual Acuity <6/12) was 12.0% (95% CI: 10.8-13.2%). The major causes of VI were cataract (78.08%), refractive error (12.07%), and optic atrophy (2.22%), and corneal opacity (2.22%) and the major cause of blindness was cataract (77.27%). Blindness was strongly associated with increasing age- OR 17.1 (95% CI: 4.9-59.8) for people >70 years, and OR 7.6 (95% CI: 2.2-26.5) for people aged between 60 and 69 years compared to those aged 41-50 years and people living near coastal regions (Within 50 km of coast) (OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.6-7.3). CONCLUSION: Blindness and vision impairment are of public health concern in this geographic region. Eye care services need to be augmented to address this challenge.

Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by cataract: a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: To estimate global and regional trends from 2000 to 2020 of the number of persons visually impaired by cataract and their proportion of the total number of vision-impaired individuals. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published population studies and gray literature from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to estimate global and regional trends. We developed prevalence estimates based on modeled distance visual impairment and blindness due to cataract, producing location-, year-, age-, and sex-specific estimates of moderate to severe vision impairment (MSVI presenting visual acuity <6/18, ≥3/60) and blindness (presenting visual acuity <3/60). Estimates are age-standardized using the GBD standard population. RESULTS: In 2020, among overall (all ages) 43.3 million blind and 295 million with MSVI, 17.0 million (39.6%) people were blind and 83.5 million (28.3%) had MSVI due to cataract blind 60% female, MSVI 59% female. From 1990 to 2020, the count of persons blind (MSVI) due to cataract increased by 29.7%(93.1%) whereas the age-standardized global prevalence of cataract-related blindness improved by -27.5% and MSVI increased by 7.2%. The contribution of cataract to the age-standardized prevalence of blindness exceeded the global figure only in South Asia (62.9%) and Southeast Asia and Oceania (47.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The number of people blind and with MSVI due to cataract has risen over the past 30 years, despite a decrease in the age-standardized prevalence of cataract. This indicates that cataract treatment programs have been beneficial, but population growth and aging have outpaced their impact. Growing numbers of cataract blind indicate that more, better-directed, resources are needed to increase global capacity for cataract surgery.

Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by glaucoma: A meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate global and regional trends from 2000 to 2020 of the number of persons visually impaired by glaucoma and their proportion of the total number of vision-impaired individuals. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published population studies and grey literature from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to estimate global and regional trends in number of people with vision loss due to glaucoma. Moderate or severe vision loss (MSVI) was defined as visual acuity of 6/60 or better but <6/18 (moderate) and visual acuity of 3/60 or better but <6/60 (severe vision loss). Blindness was defined as presenting visual acuity <3/60. RESULTS: Globally, in 2020, 3.61 million people were blind and nearly 4.14 million were visually impaired by glaucoma. Glaucoma accounted for 8.39% (95% uncertainty intervals [UIs]: 6.54, 10.29) of all blindness and 1.41% (95% UI: 1.10, 1.75) of all MSVI. Regionally, the highest proportion of blindness relating to glaucoma was found in high-income countries (26.12% [95% UI: 20.72, 32.09]), while the region with the highest age-standardized prevalence of glaucoma-related blindness and MSVI was Sub-Saharan Africa. Between 2000 and 2020, global age-standardized prevalence of glaucoma-related blindness among adults ≥50 years decreased by 26.06% among males (95% UI: 25.87, 26.24), and by 21.75% among females (95% UI: 21.54, 21.96), while MSVI due to glaucoma increased by 3.7% among males (95% UI: 3.42, 3.98), and by 7.3% in females (95% UI: 7.01, 7.59). CONCLUSIONS: Within the last two decades, glaucoma has remained a major cause of blindness globally and regionally.

Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to update estimates of global vision loss due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based surveys of eye diseases from January, 1980, to October, 2018. We fitted hierarchical models to estimate the prevalence of moderate and severe vision impairment (MSVI; presenting visual acuity from <6/18 to 3/60) and blindness ( < 3/60) caused by AMD, stratified by age, region, and year. RESULTS: In 2020, 1.85 million (95%UI: 1.35 to 2.43 million) people were estimated to be blind due to AMD, and another 6.23 million (95%UI: 5.04 to 7.58) with MSVI globally. High-income countries had the highest number of individuals with AMD-related blindness (0.60 million people; 0.46 to 0.77). The crude prevalence of AMD-related blindness in 2020 (among those aged ≥ 50 years) was 0.10% (0.07 to 0.12) globally, and the region with the highest prevalence of AMD-related blindness was North Africa/Middle East (0.22%; 0.16 to 0.30). Age-standardized prevalence (using the GBD 2019 data) of AMD-related MSVI in people aged ≥ 50 years in 2020 was 0.34% (0.27 to 0.41) globally, and the region with the highest prevalence of AMD-related MSVI was also North Africa/Middle East (0.55%; 0.44 to 0.68). From 2000 to 2020, the estimated crude prevalence of AMD-related blindness decreased globally by 19.29%, while the prevalence of MSVI increased by 10.08%. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated increase in the number of individuals with AMD-related blindness and MSVI globally urges the creation of novel treatment modalities and the expansion of rehabilitation services.

Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by Uncorrected Refractive Error: a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Uncorrected refractive error (URE) is a readily treatable cause of visual impairment (VI). This study provides updated estimates of global and regional vision loss due to URE, presenting temporal change for VISION 2020 METHODS: Data from population-based eye disease surveys from 1980-2018 were collected. Hierarchical models estimated prevalence (95% uncertainty intervals [UI]) of blindness (presenting visual acuity (VA) < 3/60) and moderate-to-severe vision impairment (MSVI; 3/60 ≤ presenting VA < 6/18) caused by URE, stratified by age, sex, region, and year. Near VI prevalence from uncorrected presbyopia was defined as presenting near VA < N6/N8 at 40 cm when best-corrected distance (VA ≥ 6/12). RESULTS: In 2020, 3.7 million people (95%UI 3.10-4.29) were blind and 157 million (140-176) had MSVI due to URE, a 21.8% increase in blindness and 72.0% increase in MSVI since 2000. Age-standardised prevalence of URE blindness and MSVI decreased by 30.5% (30.7-30.3) and 2.4% (2.6-2.2) respectively during this time. In 2020, South Asia GBD super-region had the highest 50+ years age-standardised URE blindness (0.33% (0.26-0.40%)) and MSVI (10.3% (8.82-12.10%)) rates. The age-standardized ratio of women to men for URE blindness was 1.05:1.00 in 2020 and 1.03:1.00 in 2000. An estimated 419 million (295-562) people 50+ had near VI from uncorrected presbyopia, a +75.3% (74.6-76.0) increase from 2000 CONCLUSIONS: The number of cases of VI from URE substantively grew, even as age-standardised prevalence fell, since 2000, with a continued disproportionate burden by region and sex. Global population ageing will increase this burden, highlighting urgent need for novel approaches to refractive service delivery.

The characteristics of sexual behavior in blind men in Ganzhou, China: A cross-sectional study.

Visual stimuli play key roles in influencing men sexual behavior. However, few studies have explored the sexual behavior of blind men. To provide more information about blind men for the study of andrology by surveying the characteristics of their current sexual behavior. A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study design was performed. The questionnaire contained questions regarding demographic characteristics of participants, access to sexual knowledge, perception of the sexual partners' beauty, and sexual arousal. Blind men were interviewed face-to-face by the trained investigator. Complete questionnaires were collected from 54 participants, with an average age of 40.57 ±â€…9.80 years old. Eye diseases were the most frequent cause of blindness. In terms of sexual orientation, all participants were heterosexual. Notably, 90.7% of the participants reported to have had a sexual experience. Among those who had engaged in sexual behavior, 93.6% experienced sexual pleasure and 69.4% had a normal erectile function. Overall, 16.7% of the participants received sex education. The participants obtained sexual knowledge mainly through sounds from mobile phones, peer-to-peer communication, sounds of television and radio. Voice was the most frequent perception of the sexual partners' beauty, followed by figure, skin, and body fragrance. In terms of stimuli of sexual arousal, tactile sensation and auditory sensation in that order were the most frequent stimuli of sexual arousal. Stimuli of sexual arousal in blind men are mainly mediated by sound and touch. Blind men understand their sexual partners' beauty through auditory, tactile, and olfactory sensations. Blind men in Ganzhou lack formal and systematic sex education.

Characterization of the visually impaired patients with diabetes mellitus in Japan.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To conduct a multicenter survey of visually impaired patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and to identify the physical and ocular characteristics that lead to blindness in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Visually impaired patients with diabetes mellitus in Japan were divided into blind and low-vision groups according to the World Health Organization classification. Data on parameters related to diabetes mellitus and ocular complications in the right and left eyes were collected from 19 highly advanced medical facilities and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among 408 visually impaired persons (blind group: 257, low-vision group: 151), 72.1% were under 70 years of age. The rates of neovascular glaucoma (NVG) (right eye, P = 0.041; left eye, P = 0.0031) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (right eye: P = 0.014, left eye: P = 0.0047) and the rate of proliferative membrane beyond half of the retinal area (right eye: P = 0.0263, left eye: P = 0.037) were significantly higher in the blind group. The direct cause of visual impairment was retinal atrophy, common in both groups. Neovascular glaucoma and diabetic macular edema were equally prevalent in the blind and low-vision groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, blind patients with diabetes mellitus are characterized by severe conditions such as neovascular glaucoma and progressive proliferative diabetic retinopathy upon their initial visit to an advanced care facility. These results highlight the importance of monitoring retinopathy through regular ophthalmological examinations, internal medicine, and appropriate therapeutic intervention.

Investigating physical activity levels in adults who are blind and vision impaired.

BACKGROUND: It is well established that meeting physical activity (PA) guidelines has a range of physical and mental health benefits. For people who are blind and vision impaired (BVI) there may be additional benefits in terms of social inclusion and the prevention of sight deterioration. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify PA levels, barriers to and motivators for PA in adults who are BVI. METHODS: PA levels, perceived barriers to, and motivators for PA were measured via questionnaire of 310 self-identifying BVI adults (n = 310 mean age = 29.77 ± 11.37, 55.8% male). RESULTS: PA levels were low, with 21.7% meeting PA guidelines. Median PA levels were not statistically significantly different between different age groups. There was no significant difference between genders, though mean days of PA for males was 0.382 days lower than for females. There was a significant difference between PA levels between the "no vision" (B1) and "useful vision" (B3) groups (p = 0.027), and the "no vision" (B1) and the "low vision" (B2) groups (p = 0.003). Transport (54.8%) and lack of access to enjoyable activities (47.0%) were the most commonly cited barriers, while "to relax" (36.4%) and "to have fun" (35.6%) were most commonly cited as very important motivators. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a valuable insight into the low levels of PA that persist amongst adults with BVI. Future research should seek to gain a deeper understanding of the PA barriers, motivators and facilitators in this cohort.

Unilateral visual impairment and blindness in school children - prevalence and aetiology in Saki-East LGA of Oyo State, Nigeria.

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the prevalence and aetiology of unilateral visual impairment (VI) and blindness and its associated factors in school children. METHODS: We conducted a multistage, cross-sectional study in primary and secondary schools of Saki-East Local Government Area of Oyo State, Nigeria. Unilateral VI was defined as presenting visual acuity (PVA) worse than +0.3 LogMAR (6/12) and unilateral blindness as PVA worse than +1.3 LogMAR (3/60) in the worse eye. Detailed ocular examinations were performed for students with unilateral VI, and Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore associations with independent variables. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 11 ± 3.2 years. Thirty-six (0.98%) of 3671 children had unilateral VI, and fifteen children had unilateral blindness (0.41%), giving a combined prevalence of 1.39 ± 0.5%. History of ocular trauma was reported by 14 (27.5%) participants with unilateral VI and blindness. In addition, those with a history of ocular trauma were 6.5 times more likely to be blind or have a severe VI (95% CI 1.5-2.8) than those without a history of ocular trauma. Uncorrected refractive error was the major cause of unilateral VI in 26 (51%) participants, while traumatic cataract was the main cause of unilateral blindness seen in 5 (9.8%) participants, none of whom had a previous eye examination. CONCLUSION: Fourteen per thousand school children had unilateral VI in this study; the major causes were refractive error and cataract, which are treatable. Ocular trauma was a significant risk factor for unilateral VI and blindness.

Associação entre diabetes mellitus e doenças oculares em pessoas com deficiência visual / Association between diabetes mellitus and eye diseases in people with visual impairment / Asociación entre diabetes mellitus y enfermedades oculares en personas con discapacidad visual

Objetivo: verificar associação entre diabetes mellitus e doenças oculares em pessoas com deficiência visual. Método: estudo transversal com 51 pessoas com diabetes e deficiência visual, em um centro de reabilitação visual do interior paulista, que participaram de entrevista estruturada, em 2018. Utilizou-se os testes: Kolmogorov Smirnov, Regressão de Poisson, Regressão de Logística Binária, e Correlação de Spearman. Resultados: a maioria das pessoas era cega e relatou que a retinopatia diabética, o glaucoma e a catarata foram causa da deficiência visual; com tempo de diagnóstico do diabetes acima de 109 meses. A catarata apresentou um nível de correlação baixa (r=0,280 e p=0,047), e a retinopatia diabética um nível de correlação moderada (r=0,565 e p=0,000), considerando o tempo de diagnóstico do diabetes. Conclusão: associação estatisticamente significante entre o tipo de diabetes e a retinopatia, e correlação estatisticamente significante entre o tempo de diagnóstico do diabetes, a catarata e a retinopatia diabética.

Objective: to verify the association between diabetes mellitus and eye diseases in people with visual impairment. Method: this cross-sectional study involved 51 people with diabetes and visual impairment at a Visual Rehabilitation Center in São Paulo, who participated in a structured interview in 2018. The tests used were: Kolmogorov Smirnov, Poisson Regression, Binary Logistic Regression, and Spearman Correlation. Results: most participants were blind, reported that diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma and cataracts were the causes of their visual impairment, and had been diagnosed with diabetes over 109 months earlier. Cataract returned a low level of correlation with time with diagnosis of diabetes (r = 0.280 and p = 0.047), and diabetic retinopathy, moderate correlation (r = 0.565 and p = 0.000). Conclusion: a statistically significant association was found between type of diabetes and retinopathy, and statistically significant correlations between the time diagnosed with diabetes, cataracts and diabetic retinopathy.

Objetivo: verificar la asociación entre diabetes mellitus y enfermedades oculares en personas con discapacidad visual. Método: este estudio transversal involucró a 51 personas con diabetes y discapacidad visual en un Centro de Rehabilitación Visual en São Paulo, quienes participaron en una entrevista estructurada en 2018.Las pruebas utilizadas fueron: Kolmogorov Smirnov, Regresión de Poisson, Regresión Logística Binaria y Spearman Correlación. Resultados: la mayoría de los participantes eran ciegos, informaron que la retinopatía diabética, el glaucoma y las cataratas eran las causas de su discapacidad visual y habían sido diagnosticados con diabetes más de 109 meses antes. La catarata devolvió un bajo nivel de correlación con el tiempo con el diagnóstico de diabetes (r = 0,280 yp = 0,047) y la retinopatía diabética, correlación moderada (r = 0,565 yp = 0,000). Conclusión: se encontró asociación estadísticamente significativa entre tipo de diabetes y retinopatía, y correlaciones estadísticamente significativas entre el tiempo de diagnóstico de diabetes, cataratas y retinopatía diabética.

Validación del Iolf5c para la eficacia del lanzamiento en fútbol para ciegos / Validation of the Iolf5c instrument for the efficacy of shooting on goal in football for the blind

El objetivo del estudio es diseñar y validar un instrumento de observación para conocer los Indicadores de Rendimiento Competitivo en Fútbol a 5 para personas ciegas a través de jueces expertos. La muestra se compuso por 12 entrenadores expertos en Fútbol a 5. Tras la realización de un estudio preliminar, el IOLF5C quedó estructurado en dos partes: acciones básicas durante el lanzamiento a portería en situaciones de juego, y durante el penalti. La validez de contenido se realizó a través de la V de Aiken y sus intervalos de confianza. Para comprobar la consistencia interna del instrumento se empleó α de Cronbach. Los resultados indicaron que el IOLF5C dispone de niveles óptimos de validez obteniendo valores superiores a 0,875 en todos los ítems durante el juego y 0,96 en penalti. La consistencia del instrumento fue de 0,894. Por tanto, el IOLF5C es un instrumento válido y fiable

The aim of this study was to design and validate an observational instrument to identify essential competitive performance indicators in Football 5-a-Side for blind and partially sighted players through the assistance of expert evaluators. The sample was comprised of twelve Football 5-a-Side expert coaches. After a preliminary study, the OLF5C instrument was structured to include two groups of actions: basic actions during shots on goal in game situations and shooting actions penalty situations. Aiken's V statistic and confidence interval values were used to assess the content validity and Cronbach' value was used to assess the internal consistency of the instrument. Results indicated that the IOLF5C has good validity indices with obtained values reaching .875 in all items during game situations and 0.96 on penalty shot actions. The overall level of instrument consistency was .894. The IOLF5C is considered to be a valid and reliable instrument

Deficiências visual, auditiva e motora entre a população indígena no Brasil / Visual, hearing, and motor impairments in the indigenous population in Brazil / Discapacidad visual, auditiva y motora entre la población indígena en Brasil

O objetivo deste estudo foi descrever a prevalência de deficiências visual, auditiva e motora e estimar a chance de se ter uma das três deficiências, separadamente, segundo grau de severidade, para a população indígena no Brasil. Os dados foram retirados do Censo Demográfico de 2010 coletados pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Os métodos utilizados incluem a padronização direta para o cálculo das prevalências e modelos de regressão logística multinomial. Os resultados padronizados mostram que homens e mulheres indígenas apresentam a maior prevalência em cada uma das deficiências examinadas neste trabalho, sendo a única exceção a deficiência visual de grau leve entre as mulheres. Os resultados dos modelos de regressão multinomial mostram uma desvantagem relativa dos povos indígenas em quase todos os tipos de deficiência.

This study aimed to describe the prevalence of visual, hearing, and motor impairments in the indigenous population in Brazil and to estimate the odds of presenting one of the three disabilities, separately, according to degree of severity. The data were obtained from the 2010 Population Census conducted by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). The methods included direct standardization for calculation of the prevalence rates and multinomial logistic regression models. According to the standardized results, indigenous men and women showed the highest prevalence in each of the three disabilities, except for mild visual impairment in women. The results of the multinomial regression models revealed a relative disadvantage for indigenous peoples in nearly all the types of disability.

El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la prevalencia de discapacidad visual, auditiva y motora y estimar la oportunidad de sufrir una de las tres discapacidades, separadamente, según el grado de severidad, en la población indígena de Brasil. Los datos se obtuvieron del Censo Demográfico de 2010, recogidos por el Instituto Brasileño de Geografía y Estadística (IBGE). Los métodos utilizados incluyen la estandarización directa para el cálculo de las prevalencias y modelos de regresión logística multinomial. Los resultados estandarizados muestran que hombres y mujeres indígenas presentan la mayor prevalencia en cada una de las discapacidades examinadas en este trabajo, siendo la única excepción la discapacidad visual de grado leve entre las mujeres. Los resultados de los modelos de regresión multinomial muestran una desventaja relativa de los pueblos indígenas en casi todos los tipos de discapacidad.

Tabaquismo y discapacidad visual: un enfoque preliminar desde la Psicología Preventiva / Smoking and visual disability: a preliminary approach from Preventive Psychology

El tabaquismo constituye un grave factor de riesgo para la salud ocular, se prioriza la gravosa afectación que implica el consumo de tabaco en personas con discapacidad visual (PcDV). A pesar de que existen antecedentes de suficiente evidencia científica acerca de la severa toxicidad del tabaquismo para la visión, constituye un área mayormente descuidada. Considerando el Informe Mundial sobre la Discapacidad y la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad (CDPD), se formula la necesidad de ratificar el Artículo 25, Derecho a la Salud de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas, y la necesidad de que los países adopten medidas legislativas que incluyan información sobre este factor de riesgo. En las recomendaciones sanitarias se debe informar que el tabaquismo causa graves enfermedades oculares y que puede causar ceguera. Como así también se promuevan gestiones gubernamentales, interdisciplinarias e intersectoriales en el área sanitaria y la población en general para un abordaje desde la Psicología Preventiva y la Atención Primaria de la Salud (APS) (AU)

Smoking constitutes a serious factor of risk for the ocular health; the priority is the burdensome affectation that implies the consumption of tobacco in Persons with Visual Impairment (PVI). Although there is a history of sufficient scientific evidence about the severe toxicity of smoking for vision, it constitutes an area mainly careless. Considering the World Report on Disability and the Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; there is evident the need to ratify the Article 25, Right to health of the Persons with Disabilities (CDPD) of the United Nations Organization and the need for countries to adopt legislative measures include information of this risk factor. In the sanitary recommendations should be informed that smoking causes serious eye diseases and that can cause blindness. So are also can promote governmental, interdisciplinary and intersectoral actions in the health area and in the general population for an approach from Preventive Psychology and Primary Health Car (PHC (AU)

Avaliação do perfil socioeconômico, formação profissional e estado de saúde de pessoas com deficiência visual / Evaluation of socioeconomic profile, professional training and health status of people with visual impairment

Resumo Objetivo: Verificar os aspectos socioeconômicos, a formação profissional, o nível de escolaridade e o estado de saúde de pessoas com deficiência visual. Métodos: Estudo transversal e descritivo com participação de 33 pessoas com deficiência visual, atendidas em uma Instituição Especializada para essa deficiência na cidade de Uberaba-MG, sendo 16 com baixa visão e 17 cegos. Avaliou-se os aspectos socioeconômicos por meio do instrumento Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil (CCEB), a formação profissional e o estado de saúde foi verificado com o preenchimento de um formulário estruturado. Resultados: A faixa etária foi de 47,3 anos (± 17,2 anos), com prevalência do sexo feminino (57,5%) e da raça branca (51,5%). Em relação à formação profissional, 50% dos indivíduos com baixa visão e 52,9% com cegueira são aposentados; e a escolaridade foi de 8 anos de estudo para ambos os grupos. No estado de saúde 31,2% dos participantes com baixa visão apresentaram retinose pigmentar, e 23,5% dos participantes com cegueira apresentaram glaucoma. Em ambos grupos a maioria dos indivíduos não possuía nenhum tipo de comorbidade associado. De acordo com CCEB para o grupo baixa visão, a média da pontuação total foi de 18,4 pontos e para o grupo de cegos foi de 18,1; culminando na classificação C1 do nível socioeconômico. Conclusão: O perfil das pessoas do estudo demonstrou situações razoáveis de escolaridade, presença de indivíduos brancos e solteiros com idade economicamente ativa, com benefício de aposentadoria e classe econômica baixa.

Abstract Objective: To verify the socioeconomic aspects, the professional formation, the educational level and the state of health of people with visual deficiency. Methods: This is a cross-sectional and descriptive study with the participation of 33 people with visual impairment attended at a Specialized Institution for this deficiency in the city of Uberaba-MG, 16 with low vision and 17 with blindness. Socioeconomic aspects were evaluated through the Brazilian Economic Classification Criteria (CCEB), professional training and health status were verified by completing a structured form. Results: The age group was 47.3 years (± 17.2 years), with a prevalence of female (57.5%) and white (51.5%). In relation to professional training, 50% of the individuals with low vision and 52.9% with blindness are retired people; and schooling was 8 years of study for both groups. In the health condition 31.2% of the participants of low vision presented retinitis pigmentosa, and 23.5% of participants with blindness had glaucoma. In both groups, most individuals did not have any associated comorbidities. According to CCEB for the low vision group, the mean of the total score was 18.4 points and for the blind group was 18.1; culminating in the C1 classification of the socioeconomic level. Conclusion: The profile of the people in the study showed reasonable situations of schooling, presence of white and single individuals with economically active age, with retirement benefits and low economic class.