CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE QUALITY OF DXA SCANS AND REPORTS.

OBJECTIVE: High-quality dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans are necessary for accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring of therapy; however, DXA scan reports may contain errors that cause confusion about diagnosis and treatment. This American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology consensus statement was generated to draw attention to many common technical problems affecting DXA report conclusions and provide guidance on how to address them to ensure that patients receive appropriate osteoporosis care. METHODS: The DXA Writing Committee developed a consensus based on discussion and evaluation of available literature related to osteoporosis and osteodensitometry. RESULTS: Technical errors may include errors in scan acquisition and/or analysis, leading to incorrect diagnosis and reporting of change over time. Although the International Society for Clinical Densitometry advocates training for technologists and medical interpreters to help eliminate these problems, many lack skill in this technology. Suspicion that reports are wrong arises when clinical history is not compatible with scan interpretation (e.g., dramatic increase/decrease in a short period of time; declines in previously stable bone density after years of treatment), when different scanners are used, or when inconsistent anatomic sites are used for monitoring the response to therapy. Understanding the concept of least significant change will minimize erroneous conclusions about changes in bone density. CONCLUSION: Clinicians must develop the skills to differentiate technical problems, which confound reports, from real biological changes. We recommend that clinicians review actual scan images and data, instead of relying solely on the impression of the report, to pinpoint errors and accurately interpret DXA scan images. ABBREVIATIONS: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; BMC = bone mineral content; BMD = bone mineral density; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry; LSC = least significant change; TBS = trabecular bone score; WHO = World Health Organization.

Bone shortening of clavicular fractures: comparison of measurement methods.

BACKGROUND: The indication for operative treatment of clavicular fractures with bone shortening over 2 cm is much debated. Correct measurement of clavicular length is essential, and reliable measures of clavicular length are therefore highly requested by clinical decision-makers. The aim of this study was to investigate if three commonly scientifically used measurement methods were interchangeable to each other. METHODS: A retrospective study using radiographs collected as part of a previous study on clavicular fractures. Two independent raters measured clavicle shortening on 60 patients using conventional radiographs on two separate sessions. The two measurement methods described by Hill et al. and Silva et al. were used on unilateral pictures. Side difference measurements according to Lazarides et al. were made on panoramic radiographs. The measurements were analyzed using intraclass correlation, Weir's protocol for Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: None of the methods were directly interchangeable. The side difference method by Lazarides et al. was the most reliable of the three methods, but had a high proportion of post-fracture bone lengthening that indicated methodological problems. The Hill et al. and Silva et al. methods had high minimal detectable change, making their use unreliable. CONCLUSION: As all three measurement methods had either reliability or methodological issues, we found it likely that differences in measurement methods have caused the differences in clavicular length observed in scientific studies.

Evaluation of different techniques for CT radiation profile width measurement.

This work has been conducted to demonstrate a procedure for using a Konica Minolta computed radiography (CR) system for the measurement of computed tomography (CT) radiation profile width, and to compare this method with conventional and GAFCHROMIC XR-QA2 film measurements. The exposure and processing conditions of a Konica Minolta CR reader system were characterized to establish the relationship between exposure at the imaging plate (IP) and pixel value. A 6 cc ionization chamber was exposed at the isocenter of a CT scanner using 80 kVp, 0.4 sec with various mA settings. CR images were processed in fixed modes with various combinations of S and G values, establishing exposure and pixel value relationships. Appropriate exposure techniques and processing parameters were selected to avoid the saturation of the IP. Using the selected exposure and processing parameters, radiation profiles of various nominal collimation settings (40, 20, 10, and 5 mm) were acquired for measurement. Radiochromic film was characterized and utilized to compare with CR profiles and profiles obtained via conventional film. Appropriate exposures for both CR (80 kVp, large body filter, 4 and 8 mAs) and radiochromic films (120 kVp, large body filter, 300 mAs) were determined. Recommended CR processing settings (fixed mode with S = 5 and G= 1.81) were also determined. Compared to the conventional film results, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) results for CR agreed well within ± 10%, while radiochromic film results showed maximum deviations of about 5%. In conclusion, FWHM of CT radiation profiles can be conveniently and accurately measured using a Konica Minolta CR system or XR-QA2 film when appropriate exposure technique and processing parameters are used.

Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.

BACKGROUND: Reject analysis can be used as a quality indicator, and is an important tool in localizing areas where optimization is required. Reducing number of rejects is important yielding reduced patient exposure and increased cost-effectiveness. PURPOSE: To determine rejection rates and causes in direct digital radiography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected during a three-month period in spring 2010 at two direct digital laboratories in Norway. All X-ray examinations, types, numbers, and reasons for rejections were obtained using automatic reject analysis software. Thirteen causes for rejection could be selected. RESULTS: Out of the 27,284 acquired images, 3206 were rejected, yielding an overall rejection rate of 12%. Highest rejection rates were found for examination of knees, shoulders, and wrist. In all, 77% of the rejected images arose from positioning errors. CONCLUSION: An overall rejection rate of 12% indicates a need for optimizing radiographic practice in the department.

Feasibility study of semi-automated measurements of finger joint space widths.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate technical feasibility based on image capturing conditions (film-focus distance (FFD), film sensitivity, film brand, exposure level and tube voltage) that potentially alter radiographs and consequently may influence the semi-automated measurement of joint space distance (JSD) by computer-aided joint space analysis (CAJSA) in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. The radiographs of a left hand (deceased man) were acquired under systematically changing image capturing conditions (exposure level: 4-8 mAs; FFD: 90-130 cm; film sensitivity: 200/400 and tube voltage: 40-52 kV with different image modalities: conventional radiographs, original digital radiographs, digital print-outs). All JSD-measurements were performed with the CAJSA-technology (Radiogrammetry Kit, Version 1.3.6; Sectra; Sweden) at the metacarpal-phalangeal articulation. JSD-analysis was not influenced by changes of FFD, exposure level, film sensitivity or film brand. JSD showed significant variation caused by tube voltage (conventional: CV = 1.913% for Agfa and CV = 2.448% for Kodak; digital: CV = 0.741% for Philips print-outs and CV = 0.620% with original digital images versus CV = 2.185% for Siemens print-outs and 0.951% with original digital images). Computer-aided joint space analysis for JSD-measurements is unaffected by the following image capturing parameters: film-focus distance, film sensitivity, film brand and exposure level. An influence of tube voltage was detected in a lesser extent for original digital images compared to the printed digital as well as conventional versions. Consequently, a standardized tube voltage is essential for accurate reproductions of CAJSA-measurements in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.

The aim of this study was to assess the detection of proximal caries in primary teeth at three different tube potentials using Ektaspeed films, storage phosphor plates (SPPs), and a charge-coupled device (CCD). Fifty-three extracted human primary molars with natural proximal caries were radiographed with three different imaging modalities--Digora Optime SPP system, RVGui CCD system, and Ektaspeed films--at 50-, 65-, and 70-kV tube potentials. Three observers scored the resultant images for the presence or absence of caries. The definitive diagnosis was determined by stereomicroscopic assessment. The diagnostic accuracy for each imaging modality was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (A(z)). Differences among the A(z) values were assessed using two-way ANOVA and t tests. Kappa was used to measure inter- and intra-observer agreement. Higher accuracy was found for SPPs compared to film and CCD images at all tube potentials. Accuracy was significantly different only at 50-kV tube setting in favor of SPPs (p < 0.05). Inter- and intra-observer agreement was high for all systems. A SPP system can be recommended for dental peadodontic clinics particularly with 50-kV tube potential for the diagnosis of proximal caries since further advantages include the elimination of chemical processing, image enhancement, and a better low-contrast detectability performance.

Evaluation of effective energy using radiochromic film and a step-shaped aluminum filter.

Although the half-value layer (HVL) is one of the important parameters for quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC), constant monitoring has not been performed because measurements using an ionization chamber (IC) are time-consuming and complicated. To solve these problems, a method using radiochromic film and step-shaped aluminum (Al) filters has been developed. To this end, GAFCHROMIC EBT2 dosimetry film (GAF-EBT2), which shows only slight energy dependency errors in comparison with GAFCHROMIC XR TYPE-R (GAF-R) and other radiochromic films, has been used. The measurement X-ray tube voltages were 120, 100, and 80 kV. GAF-EBT2 was scanned using a flat-bed scanner before and after exposure. To remove the non-uniformity error caused by image acquisition of the flat-bed scanner, the scanning image of the GAF-EBT2 before exposure was subtracted after exposure. HVL was evaluated using the density attenuation ratio. The effective energies obtained using HVLs of GAF-EBT2, GAF-R, and an IC dosimeter were compared. Effective energies with X-ray tube voltages of 120, 100, and 80 kV using GAF-EBT2 were 40.6, 36.0, and 32.9 keV, respectively. The difference ratios of the effective energies using GAF-EBT2 and the IC were 5.0%, 0.9%, and 2.7%, respectively. GAF-EBT2 and GAF-R proved to be capable of measuring effective energy with comparable precision. However, in HVL measurements of devices operating in the high-energy range (X-ray CT, radiotherapy machines, and so on), GAF-EBT2 was found to offer higher measurement precision than GAF-R, because it shows only a slight energy dependency.

Evaluation of EBT radiochromic film using a multiple exposure technique.

Radiochromic film is a self developing two-dimensional dosimeter system that is widely used in radiotherapy. Since its development some 40 years ago many improvements have been made; however the sensitivity can vary across the film and a non-linear dose response remains. The former can be addressed using a double exposure technique; however this technique assumes that the response is linear so that the dose distribution is incorrectly measured. We are proposing the use of two homogenous exposures; one performed prior, the other after the irradiation to be measured. In this 'multiple exposure technique' (MET), the first homogenous exposure can be used to correct for variations in response in different parts of the film, while the second homogenous exposure allows correction for non-linearity of response with dose. The MET was tested with a 60° wedged field and an Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy fluence map produced by a computerised treatment planning system. In the wedge field measurements, the MET profile showed agreement within 0.6 cGy for 80% of the field compared to ionisation chamber dose values. A comparison of a TPS generated fluence map dose distribution with one measured using conventionally calibrated EBT, and another measured with MET calibrated EBT, showed similar agreement. The MET would be particularly useful for the assessment of highly inhomogenous dose distributions with high maximum dose such as encountered in hypofractionated radiation therapy.

Evaluation of a Gafchromic EBT2 film dosimetry system for radiotherapy quality assurance.

This study examines the dosimetric accuracy of Gafchromic EBT2 model radiochromic film for use in radiotherapy quality assurance. In this study, film was scanned using an Epson Perfection V700 flatbed scanner in transmission mode at 75 DPI with the subsequent analysis performed using the red and blue colour channels and ImageJ software. Results of this study suggest that the conversion of film optical density to measured dose should, at present, utilise red channel data only, without application of a blue channel correction to the data. For the batch of film examined here, film uniformity and reproducibility appear to have improved compared with published results using older batches. The orientation of the film on the scanner and the side of the film facing the light source were found to have substantial effects on results. Based on the results of this study, it is possible to recommend the use of EBT2 film in routine quality assurance testing for radiotherapy, in situations where a dose uncertainty of up to 2.8% is acceptable.

Suggested baseline ranges for performance testing of the Fujifilm FCR Capsula XL computed radiography system.

Due to the difficulty in obtaining expected baseline values from the supplier for the performance testing of the Fujifilm FCR Capsula XL computed radiography system, performance test results from the acceptance testing of 42 Capsula systems were reviewed. Guidance ranges are provided for nine system performance tests which can be applied to future testing of calibrated systems.

The assessment of cervical foramina with oblique radiographs: the effect of film angle on foraminal area.

STUDY DESIGN: Radiographic evaluation of cadaveric cervical spine specimens. OBJECTIVE: Assess reliability and reproducibility of foraminal dimensions obtained from cervical radiographs of varying obliquity and determine optimal angles for visualizing foramina at each cervical spine level. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Oblique radiographs may be considered to assess cervical foraminal dimensions and are generally obtained 45 degrees from the anteroposterior (AP) orientation. Previous reports have suggested that foraminal area observed on these radiographs may be influenced by changes in obliquity so that certain film angles may be better suited for accurately assessing foramen size, depending on which level is being evaluated. METHODS: Radiographs of 4 human cadaveric cervical spines were obtained at 5-degree increments from 20 to 70 degrees relative to AP orientation, using both left and right sides of each specimen. Foraminal area was estimated by measuring height and width of each foramen and also with a freehand area measurement tool. Reliabilities of both methods were calculated. At each level, foraminal area was plotted against film angle and quadratic best-fit curves were used to determine the maximum area observed and the optimal angle of obliquity for assessment. RESULTS: Assessment of foraminal area using the height and width values was associated with good interobserver reliability, whereas the freehand method exhibited excellent reliability. The optimal film angles for calculating foraminal area increased from 46.3 degrees for C2-C3 to 56.1 degrees for C7-T1. The ideal film angle that minimized the overall error of measurement across the entire cervical spine was estimated to be 52.4 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal angles for visualizing lower cervical foramina are larger than those for upper cervical spine. To minimize overall loss of foraminal area throughout the entire cervical spine, oblique cervical radiographs should be obtained at an angle of approximately 52 degrees from the AP orientation.

Half-value layer measurement: simple process method using radiochromic film.

Although the half-value layer (HVL) is one of the important parameters for QA and QC, constant monitoring has not been performed because the measurements using an ionization chamber (IC) are time-consuming and complicated. To solve these problems, the use of radiochromic film (GAFCHROMIC XR TYPE R: GAF-R) with step-shaped aluminum (Al) filters, referred to herein as the simple process method, has been developed. The measurement X-ray tube voltages were 120 kV, 100 kV, and 80 kV. The Al filter area, the full exposure area, and the unexposed area were set on the GAF-R so as to obtain correct data. The HVL was evaluated using the density attenuation ratio. The HVLs obtained using the GAF-R and an 1C dosimeter were compared. HVLs with X-ray tube voltages of 120 kV, 100 kV, and 80 kV using the GAF-R were 4.10 mm, 3.55 mm and 2.97 mm, respectively. The difference ratios of the HVLs using the GAF-R and the IC were 1.2%, 7.6%, and 10.0%, respectively. The HVL at 120 kV can be routinely and quickly measured using the simple process method. Therefore, an IC dosimeter is not needed for HVL measurements for QA and QC. However, the HVL measurements of low energy (100 kV and 80 kV) need attention.

Economic evaluation of computed radiography comparing to film method in quality control of general X-ray machine at Phramongkutklao Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of quality control performance for a general x-ray machine between computed radiography (CR) and film method. MATERIAL AND METHOD: CR performance as a quality control method for a general x-ray machine was compared to the film method. Two raters independently analyzed the result of quality control from both methods. Economic evaluation was performed by cost-minimization analysis. All data (result for quality control and cost) were collected from Phramongkutklao Hospital from August 2007 to January 2008. RESULT: Quality control performances of a general x-ray machine by using CR and film method were equivalent. Interobserver agreement for analysis of quality control measurements was almost perfect. Unit cost, test performance time, radiation dose for quality control by CR were less than the film method (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The performances of quality control of a general x-ray machine done by the CR method are more efficient than the film method. Using the CR method for quality control performance of the general x-ray machines will save cost enormously.

Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.

This study presents the findings from acceptance testing and routine quality control (QC) of general radiographic X-ray equipment in Ireland during 2006 and early 2007, including mobile X-ray units and film/screen fixed systems. Acceptance testing and routine QC of the diagnostic X-ray imaging equipment are requirements of European and Irish legislation. One hundred general radiographic X-ray systems were tested within Ireland, 73% of them failed to meet the required QC guidelines, whereby one or more faults were identified. The majority of these failures were minor ones, requiring attention by the suppliers at the next routine service. Significant faults were only identified in seven systems. The suppliers were requested to investigate these issues as soon as possible and take the necessary corrective action. A review of the QC results highlights the need to perform comprehensive acceptance and routine testing of the systems.

[Model for the response of radiographic films and implications for quality assurance]. / Modell für das Ansprechen radiographischer Filme und Folgerungen für die Qualitätssicherung.

The present paper describes the development of a model linking the optical density of a radiographic film to the applied dose. This model takes into account the kind of bremsstrahlung used in radiotherapy, and uses fewer parameters compared with the models developed so far. The measurements showed an influence of the field size on the model parameters. Monte Carlo simulations showed that different field sizes and depths in solid water can change the spectral distributions. The spectrum hardens with decreasing field size and increasing depth in phantom material. This has an influence on the model parameters. Nevertheless, the model can still be used to describe the relation between optical density and applied dose for films that are irradiated with fields of different size. A dose-rate dependence was not observed. The size and form of the fields used in calibration and application can therefore cause a systematic error in verification with film.

Optical density changes in dry-processed films.

CONTEXT: Dry-processed radiographic films should be stored in a temperature-controlled environment away from direct light to prevent image deterioration. However, films occasionally are subjected to other conditions, such as when they are left inadvertently on viewing boxes or removed from the radiology department. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of heat and light on optical density in radiographic films produced with dry laser imagers. METHODS: Step-wedge images generated by a dry laser imaging system were placed on an illuminated viewing box, inside the trunk of a car and in direct sunlight on a hot day for varying lengths of time. Changes in optical density (OD) then were measured with a densitometer. Changes of more than 2 standard deviations from the original OD were attributed to the effects of light and heat. RESULTS: The films left on a viewing box and inside a car's trunk did not show significant changes in OD. However, films subjected to direct sunlight for 30 minutes or more at an average temperature of 40 degrees C (104 degrees F) showed significant changes in OD in the straight-line portion of the Hurter and Driffield curve. CONCLUSION: Dry-processed films can degrade when exposed to temperatures higher than 35 degrees C (95 degrees F) and should be stored properly to avoid affecting their diagnostic quality.

Optical density variations in CT films and their effect on image quality.

It was recently reported that optical density (OD) variations were observed in CT films printed with a laser camera, depending on the printing format and the frame position within the film. The purpose of the present study was to investigate if these variations are common to both laser and dry-film printers and if the different OD settings along with day-to-day and frame-to-frame variations may affect the image quality. Eight laser and five dry-film printers installed at 12 different CT facilities were tested. For each one, the SMPTE test pattern was printed on all frames of a film using the same printing format. The ODs of the 0%, 10%, 40% and 70% patches of the 11-step greyscale of the SMPTE patterns were measured with a densitometer in all frames, while all films were examined on a viewing box to assess subjectively the image quality by visual inspection of the test pattern. A wide range of OD settings and variations were recorded. Frame-to-frame variations in the same film of up to 0.19, 0.15 and 0.21 OD, were observed for contrast index (CI, the OD difference of patches 10% and 70%), speed index (SI, the OD of patch 40%) and maximum OD (OD(max), the OD of patch 0%), respectively. The variations were not always of the same magnitude, nor always followed the same pattern, even for printers of the same model. Considering all films and frames, the CI ranged from 1.26 to 1.74, the SI from 0.68 to 1.43 and the OD(max) from 2.5 to 3.11 OD, well beyond the proposed settings and tolerances of 1.55+/-0.15, 1.15+/-0.1 and 2.45+/-0.1 given in the literature for CI, SI and OD(max), respectively. Despite these large differences, the various problems that were identified in image quality from the visual inspection of the films could not be directly attributed to OD settings, as films with similar CI, SI and OD(max) presented quite different image quality levels. Therefore, for routine quality control, thorough visual inspection of the SMPTE test pattern provides all the necessary information about the imaging chain status.

Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.

In this study the effect of different mammographic screen-film combinations on image quality and breast dose, and the correlation between the various image quality parameters, breast dose and the sensitometric parameters of a film were investigated. Three Agfa (MR5-II, HDR, HT), two Kodak (Min-R M, Min-R 2000), one Fuji (AD-M), one Konica (CM-H) and one Ferrania (HM plus) single emulsion mammographic films were combined with three intensifying screens (Agfa HDS, Kodak Min-R 2190 and Fuji AD-MA). The film characteristics were determined by sensitometry, while the image quality and the dose to the breast of the resulting 24 screen-film combinations were assessed using a mammography quality control phantom. For each combination, three images of the phantom were acquired with optical density within three different ranges. Two observers assessed the quality of the 72 phantom images obtained, while the breast dose was calculated from the exposure data required for each image. Large differences among screen-film combinations in terms of image quality and breast dose were identified however, that, could not be correlated with the film's sensitometric characteristics. All films presented the best resolution when combined with the HDS screen at the expense of speed, and the largest speed when combined with the AD-MA screen, without degradation of the overall image quality. However, an ideal screen-film combination presenting the best image quality with the least dose was not identified. It is also worth mentioning that the best performance for a film was not necessarily obtained when this was combined with the screen provided by the same manufacturer. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that comparison of films based on their sensitometric characteristics are of limited value for clinical practice, as their performance is strongly affected by the screens with which they are combined.