Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 200
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 81(12): 1526-1548, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37743043

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited research exists regarding the incidence and variations of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture patterns and their correlation with the mechanism of injury. Hence, further research is indicated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the different ZMC fracture patterns in relation to its etiology using computed tomography scans. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution. The medical records of maxillofacial trauma patients from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. Patients from any gender and all age groups with complete records diagnosed with isolated ZMC fractures were included in the study. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The primary predictor variable was the etiology of trauma. It was categorized as road traffic accidents (RTAs), falls, interpersonal violence, fall from height, sports injuries, etc. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was the ZMC fracture patterns observed and was defined as similar to or different from the classical fracture patterns. Any type of variation noted from the classical fracture lines was defined as the secondary outcome variable. COVARIATES: Covariates included demographic variables such as age, gender, the type of vehicle involved, the type of RTA, side of fracture, associated orbital fractures, and number of ZMC points fractured. ANALYSES: Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to measure association between the predictor and outcome variables using multiple proportions χ2 test. Statistical significance was defined at P value of <.05. RESULTS: Out of the 232 scans assessed, a total of 163 cases were included in this study. A majority of the cases belonged to a range of 21 to 30 years and showed a male predilection. The most common mode of injury was found to be RTAs (88.3%). Most cases had fracture patterns different from the classical fracture patterns (65.64%). A statistically significant association was found between the types of ZMC fracture patterns and etiology of trauma (RTA P = <.0001, falls P = .0001, and interpersonal violence P = .0001). Five different variations in ZMC fracture patterns were found and had a statistically significant association with the classical fracture lines (P < .0001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The authors conclude that the variations in fracture patterns encountered today may be attributed to the mechanism of injury. With due consideration to the limitations of this study, the authors suggest that the treatment plan may require slight modification based on the variation of the fracture pattern. Additional intervention may also be indicated.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Zygomatic Fractures , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Zygomatic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology , Zygomatic Fractures/complications , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(10): 2077-2079, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36661000

ABSTRACT

We aimed to explore the predictors of hospital length of stay for patients admitted and with maxillofacial injuries. Patients presenting with maxillofacial trauma were included. Poly-trauma involving neurosurgery and/ or needing orthopaedics intervention were excluded. Logistic regression was applied to explore the predictors associated with the hospital stay of > 4 days. There were 241 patients with mean age 29.35 ± 12.5 years (age range 12-80 years). Mandibular fracture was the commonest observation 121(50.2%), followed by maxillary 48(19.9%), and zygomatic bone fracture 9 (3.7%). Road traffic accident 196 (81.3%) appears to be the most common etiology of maxillofacial injuries in the studied sample. The mean length of hospital stay among bone plating patients was 5.96 ±6.8 days compared to 4.15±6.2 days for ones treated without bone plating; p-value 0.05. It was concluded that longer length of stay is required in patients with more complex management including bone plates.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Zygomatic Fractures , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies , Accidents, Traffic , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology , Zygomatic Fractures/surgery , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology
3.
Acta Clin Croat ; 61(3): 412-420, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37492356

ABSTRACT

Background: Knowing the severity of a pathology in a population helps to both establish a rapid diagnosis and to prepare medical staff to provide adequate and complete treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the patterns of maxillofacial fractures and their associated soft tissue injuries in order to identify the specific types of maxillofacial fractures with the highest incidence of associated soft tissue injuries. Methods: A 10-year retrospective evaluation of maxillofacial trauma was performed on 1007 patients. All 1007 patients were clinically and paraclinically confirmed to have facial skeletal injuries. Results: The highest incidence of maxillofacial fractures was found in the mandible (62.16%), the mandibular angle being the most frequently involved (28.84%). Most of the fractures were complete (97.82%), displaced (87.98%) and closed (86.30%). Hematoma was the most common associated soft tissue injury (44.79%). In mandibular trauma, the incidence of hematoma and laceration was the highest in angle and simultaneous multiple fracture lines (p=0.002). In the midface, hematoma was more frequently associated with non-comminuted zygomatic bone fractures (p=0.003), while laceration was associated with multiple underlying fracture lines (p=0.002). Conclusions: Patients presenting with hematomas will most frequently have an underlying single closed fracture line, while patients with lacerations will most frequently present underlying multiple and displaced fractures.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Skull Fractures , Soft Tissue Injuries , Zygomatic Fractures , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology , Soft Tissue Injuries/epidemiology
4.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(4): 1500-1503, 2021 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33852515

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Oral and maxillofacial fractures are the most common injuries among multiple trauma. About 5% to 10% of trauma patients having facial fractures. The objectives of this case study are to focus the most common mid-face fractures types' and to determine the relationship of the midface fracture in maxillofacial trauma among the patient who attended the outpatient clinic in a Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. In this research paper, an advanced statistical tool was chosen through the multilayer perceptron neural network methodology (MLPNN). Multilayer perceptron neural network methodology was applied to determine the most associated predictor important toward maxillary bone injury. Through the predictor important classification analysis, the relationship of each bone will be determined, and sorting according to their contribution. After sorting the most associated predictor important toward maxillary bone injury, the validation process will be applied through the value of training, testing, and validation. The input variables of MLPNN were zygomatic complex fracture, orbital wall fracture, nasal bone fracture, frontal bone fracture, and zygomatic arch fracture. The performance of MLPNN having high accuracy with 82.2%. As a conclusion, the zygomatic complex fracture is the most common fracture trauma among the patient, having the most important association toward maxillary bone fracture. This finding has the highest potential for further statistical modeling for education purposes and the decision-maker among the surgeon.


Subject(s)
Maxillary Fractures , Maxillofacial Injuries , Skull Fractures , Zygomatic Fractures , Facial Bones , Humans , Maxillary Fractures/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
5.
J Craniofac Surg ; 27(1): e91-4, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26703035

ABSTRACT

Sports and exercise are important causes of maxillofacial injuries. Different types of sports might differ in frequency and type of fractures. The aim of the present study was to explore the possible relation between the types of sport practiced and the frequency and nature of the facial bone fractures of patients presenting in an oral and maxillofacial surgery department of a Dutch university center. This study is based on an analysis of patient records containing maxillofacial fractures sustained between January 1, 2000 and April 1, 2014 at the Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center (VUmc) in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The present study comprised data from 108 patients with 128 maxillofacial fractures. Seventy-nine percent of the patients were male and 21% were female. The patients ranged in age from 10 to 64 years old with a mean age of 30.6 ± 12.0. The highest incidence of sport-related maxillofacial fractures occurred in individuals between the ages of 20 and 29. The most common sport-related fractures were zygoma complex fractures, followed by mandible fractures. Soccer and hockey were the most prominent causes of sport-related maxillofacial trauma in the present study. Coronoid process fractures were only observed in soccer players and not in other sports groups. Mandible angle fractures were relatively more frequent in rugby than in other sports. The results of this study suggest a relation between type of sport and the nature and frequency of the fractures it causes.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Facial Bones/injuries , Female , Football/injuries , Hockey/injuries , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Skull/injuries , Soccer/injuries , Young Adult , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
6.
J Craniofac Surg ; 27(1): 109-11, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26703049

ABSTRACT

OVERVIEW: Cervical spine injury may present with pediatric patients having sustained fractures of the craniofacial skeleton. Management considerations of the cervical spine often take priority to the fractures of the facial skeleton. The goal of this study was to examine this subset of patients with a focus on initial presentation and need for intervention. METHODS: A retrospective review from 2000 to 2012 of all facial fractures in patients ≤ 18 years at a level 1 trauma center was performed. Patient demographics, location of fractures, and the presence of a cervical spine injury were collected. RESULTS: During this time period, 285 patients met inclusion criteria. Ten patients were found to have a cervical spine injury. Fractures of the zygoma and orbit were significantly associated with a cervical spine injury. Patients with a cervical spine injury had a Glasgow Coma Scale of 11.2 compared with 13.8 in those without (P < 0.05). C1 was injured in 4 patients, C2 in 2 patients, and C3 to C7 in 4 patients. A surgical airway was required in 1 patient, and 6 were intubated in the trauma bay. Fractures of the mandible were significantly associated with injury to C2. Le Fort fractures and palate fractures approached significance with injury to C1. Only 1 patient had neurologic impairment at presentation, manifested as upper extremity parasthesias, and underwent decompression and fusion in the operating room. Those patients admitted (90%) were all admitted for reasons other than management of the cervical spine injury. The majority of patients (70%) were treated with collar immobilization. One patient expired. No patients had a neurologic deficit at the time of discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In this study only 1 cervical spine injury necessitated intervention, with an eventual full recovery. Cervical spine injuries presenting with fractures of the facial skeleton appear to be relatively benign in this series; however, care must be taken to identify all such injuries to avoid exacerbation during maneuvers commonly used for facial fracture treatment. Special caution should be used when examining patients with a depressed Glasgow Coma Scale or in those with upper midface fractures.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Facial Bones/injuries , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Adolescent , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/injuries , Cervical Atlas/injuries , Child , Female , Fracture Fixation/instrumentation , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Male , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Maxillary Fractures/epidemiology , New Jersey/epidemiology , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Palate, Hard/injuries , Paresthesia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
7.
J Craniofac Surg ; 26(6): 1823-5, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26147022

ABSTRACT

Pterygoid plate fractures are often described in the setting of Le Fort fractures. The goal of this study was to define other craniofacial fracture patterns causing injury to the pterygoid plates. A retrospective review of computed tomography (CT) scans obtained on craniofacial trauma patients over a 5-year period revealed 209 patients with pterygoid plate fractures. Pterygoid plate fractures in 78 patients (37.3%) were unrelated to Le Fort fractures. Common causes included sphenotemporal buttress fractures in 26 patients (33.3%), temporal bone fractures in 18 patients (23.1%), zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures in 17 patients (21.8%), and displaced mandible fractures in 14 patients (17.9%). These findings indicate that approximately one third of pterygoid plate fractures do not result from Le Fort pattern injuries and that the craniofacial surgeon should have a broad differential for causes of pterygoid plate fractures when reviewing trauma imaging.


Subject(s)
Maxillary Fractures/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Sphenoid Bone/injuries , Alveolar Process/injuries , Humans , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Nasal Bone/injuries , Retrospective Studies , Skull Base/injuries , Temporal Bone/injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Wisconsin/epidemiology , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
8.
J Craniofac Surg ; 26(8): e783-6, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26595006

ABSTRACT

The aim of the current study was to identify and compare the characteristics of maxillofacial trauma in alcohol and drug users with those of nonusers. A retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of patients treated for facial trauma between April 1999 and March 2012 at the Maxillofacial Surgery Division of the Piracicaba Dental School. The data were analyzed by descriptive analysis, binary logistic regression, and correlational analysis using SPSS 18.0 software. The results were considered relevant at P < 0.05. Medical records of 3724 patients with facial trauma were analyzed, of which 173 were illicit drug users and 19.36% reported alcohol intake. The use of illicit drugs was reported by 4.64%. The prevalent etiological factor among drug and alcohol users was interpersonal violence. The mandible was the face part most affected by fractures. Male patients exhibited increased odds of experiencing fractures (OR = 1.43), as did users of illicit drugs (OR = 1.62), when compared with nonusers. When faced with maxillofacial trauma, male drug users exhibited an increased chance of experiencing fractures. This knowledge should be used as a baseline to implement more efficient prevention strategies for this population.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Child , Female , Humans , Illicit Drugs , Male , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Tooth Avulsion/epidemiology , Tooth Fractures/epidemiology , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
9.
J Craniofac Surg ; 26(7): 2120-3, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26468794

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sports-related maxillofacial injuries contribute a significant proportion of the workload in a maxillofacial unit. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of maxillofacial sports-related injuries, treatments required, and assess the impact of the injury on future sport participation. METHOD: A retrospective review was carried out on all maxillofacial trauma referrals from September 1, 2009 to August 31, 2010. Patient records were reviewed and the following variables were recorded: age, sex, sport involved, injury sustained, mechanism of injury, treatment, subsequent participation, and interval before return to sport. RESULTS: The study population included 162 patients with sports-related facial injuries. The most common sporting injuries were as follows: Gaelic football 35.3% (N = 57), soccer 22.3% (N = 36), rugby 12.4% (N = 20), and equine sports 12.4% (N = 20). The most common injury sustained was zygomatic complex fracture 36.4% (N = 59). Mandibular fracture occurred in 20% (N = 33), orbit fracture in 14.2% (N = 23), and nasal bone fracture in 12.3% (N = 20). The most common mechanism of injury was from a clash of heads (23.4%) followed by an elbow to the face (17.2%). The majority of patients (84%) resumed participation in their chosen sport at mean interval of 7.3 weeks (range 1-18 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a significant number of sporting facial injuries, which presented over 1 year. In total, 113 patients underwent a surgical procedure for the management of their injuries. This study highlights the need to educate all players regarding use of personal protective equipment and adherence to the rules of sports.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Facial Injuries/epidemiology , Female , Football/injuries , Horses , Humans , Incidence , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Nasal Bone/injuries , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Return to Sport/statistics & numerical data , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Soccer/injuries , Young Adult , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
10.
J Craniofac Surg ; 26(1): 108-12, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25534050

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the incidence of facial fractures has changed in the United States since 1990. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of all nonpediatric inpatient and outpatient facilities of the Detroit Medical Center from 1990 to 2011 and weighted national inpatient estimates from 1993 to 2010 using the National Inpatient Survey. METHODS: Facial fractures and surgical repairs were grouped according to fracture site and scaled to annual populations. Chow testing determined the year with the most significant change in trend, and regressions were performed before and after the break point. RESULTS: Chow testing showed the year 2000 as the most significant break point across all data sets. National inpatient and institutional data showed a significant decrease in total fractures and most subsites during the 1990s and an increase since 2000. Since 1990, the rate of fracture repairs decreased at our institution and during inpatient stays in the United States. Motor vehicle-related injuries have decreased since the early 1990s. Assault rates have fallen nationally but increased slightly in Detroit. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from the largest institutional series of adult facial fractures and the largest national inpatient database supports a decrease in fractures and repairs during the 1990s and an increase in fractures despite no change in repairs since 2000. These trends are likely related to increasing use of computed tomographic imaging, decreasing severity of facial injuries, and changing incidences of the major etiologies of facial fractures.


Subject(s)
Facial Bones/injuries , Facial Injuries/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Maxillary Fractures/epidemiology , Michigan/epidemiology , Nasal Bone/injuries , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
11.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 51(4): 222-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26424186

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The prevalence and etiology of midfacial fractures varies among countries. Until now, knowledge about such type of injuries in the region of the Baltic countries was rather scarce. The purpose of the study was to analyze the prevalence, etiology and localization of midfacial fractures treated at the Vilnius University Hospital Zalgiris Clinic, Vilnius, Lithuania. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients treated for midfacial fractures during the period January 2005 to December 2010 were analyzed for gender, age distribution, frequency and type of injury, cause of fractures, consciousness status and alcohol abuse during trauma. RESULTS: The records of 799 patients were analyzed. The male-to-female ratio was 4.4:1. The mean age of the patients was 33.16±14.0 years (min 1, max 87). As much as 68.8% of injuries were zygomatic fractures, 27.9% were maxillary, and 3.3% were isolated orbital floor fractures. The most frequent causes for injury were interpersonal violence (64%), followed by falls (16.3%) and traffic accidents (8.3%). Most midfacial fractures (65.3%) occurred between April and October (P<0.05), on weekends (58.2%; P<0.05) and at night (62.0%; P<0.05). In 14%, trauma reports indicated the abuse of alcohol. More often such persons received more than one midfacial bone fracture (P<0.05) concurrently. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the main cause of midfacial fractures was assault. Male patients, aged 15-34 years, more often sustain midfacial fractures. Preventive health care programs should seek measures in the reduction of aggression and violence in close future involving family, school and community institutions.


Subject(s)
Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Orbital Fractures/etiology , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology , Zygomatic Fractures/etiology , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Consciousness , Female , Humans , Lithuania/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence , Sex Factors , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
12.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 16(3): 222-6, 2015 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26057922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To study the rarity of mandibular coronoid process fractures and treatment strategies based on the displacement of these fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 11 cases of coronoid process fractures among 307 treated cases from 2008 to 2013 was conducted. Six patients were treated conservatively and 5 underwent ORIF with associated fractures. A statistical analysis of the data obtained after subjective and objective evaluation was done. RESULTS: The incidence of coronoid process fractures was 3.58% of all mandibular fractures analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference found between two treatment modalities, but differences in maximum interincisal opening (MIO) and pain in the postoperative period were significant. CONCLUSION: We recommend that linear coronoid fractures with minimal displacement can be managed with conservative treatment. For patients with significant displacement of coronoid process, limited mouth opening or concomitant mid-face or lower-face fractures, rigid internal fixation is recommended.


Subject(s)
Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Adult , Conservative Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Dislocation/epidemiology , Fracture Fixation, Internal/statistics & numerical data , Fractures, Multiple/epidemiology , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Mandibular Condyle/injuries , Middle Aged , Rare Diseases , Retrospective Studies , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
13.
J Craniofac Surg ; 25(2): 519-23, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24561369

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze and evaluate ocular injuries in patients with maxillofacial fractures. Correlation of the ocular injury and patients' age, sex, trauma mechanism, and type of maxillofacial fracture was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2009, a total of 1131 patients with facial fractures were registered. The information and data collected and analyzed included the following: age, sex, mechanism of injury, type of facial fracture, type of ocular injury, and the relationship between ocular injury and facial fracture. RESULTS: Ocular injury (349 injuries) was sustained by 209 patients (18.5%), with a male/female ratio of 5.33:1 (176 males and 33 females). The age range of the patients associated with ocular trauma was 3 to 68 years (mean [SD], 32.40 [11.27] y). Patients aged 30 to 39 years showed the highest risk for ocular trauma (odds ratio [OR], 1.852; P < 0.001). Children showed the lowest risk for ocular injuries (OR, 0.162; P < 0.001). Motor vehicle accidents were the most common mechanism of injury (97 patients, 46.4%). Motor vehicle accidents also had a 2.243-fold risk for ocular trauma (OR, 2.243; P = 0.021). Ocular traumas were more prone to occur in patients who sustained midfacial fractures (OR, 10.232; P < 0.001), especially the patients with multiple midfacial fractures (OR, 12.389; P < 0.001). Fracture of the mandible had the lowest risk for ocular injuries (multimandibular fractures: OR, 0.035, P < 0.001; single mandibular fracture: OR, 0.151; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of ocular injuries was significantly related to sex, age, etiology, as well as the pattern and position of the maxillofacial fractures.


Subject(s)
Eye Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Maxillary Fractures/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Young Adult , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
14.
J Craniofac Surg ; 25(1): 321-7, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24406598

ABSTRACT

Facial fractures resulting from blunt-mechanism trauma, although common, have been infrequently evaluated in large studies that do not include confirmation of fractures based on author review of available patient radiographic studies. An 8-year review (1998-2006) of the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Registry was performed with institutional review board approval. Patients diagnosed with blunt-mechanism facial fractures were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes and their facial fractures confirmed by author review of computed tomographic scans. Individual fractures were classified and grouped according to the facial thirds. Intra- and interreader variability was calculated, and confirmed fracture patterns were compared to fracture patterns listed by ICD-9 codes. Concomitant injuries and demographic data were additionally evaluated. Four thousand three hundred ninety-eight patients with 8127 fractures were identified. Intra- and interreader variability was 2% and 7%, respectively. ICD-9 coding misdiagnosed 12.5% of all fractures. Eighty-two percent of patients sustained associated injuries, including basilar skull fractures (7.6%) and cervical spine fractures (6.6%). 1.1% had at least one fracture in each facial third (panfacial fracture pattern). Significant relationships were found between demographic parameters, concomitant injuries, specific fractures, and fracture patterns. Studies investigating facial fractures should report fracture patterns confirmed by author review of available radiographic imaging. Large retrospective data sets containing confirmed fractures and capable of addressing rare fracture patterns can be compiled with low inter- and intrauser variability, and are useful for generating mechanistic hypotheses suitable for evaluation in prospective series or by directed biomechanical studies.


Subject(s)
Facial Bones/injuries , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Frontal Bone/injuries , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Maryland/epidemiology , Maxillary Fractures/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Nasal Bone/injuries , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
15.
J Craniofac Surg ; 24(6): 1891-7, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24220369

ABSTRACT

Fractures of the pediatric zygoma are uncommon and are often associated with high-impact trauma, as evidenced by the relatively increased prevalence of concomitant injuries observed in these patients. Despite advances in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of pediatric craniofacial injuries, data regarding zygomatic fractures in children remain poorly established. The diagnosis of zygomatic disruption is more difficult in children and requires the maintenance of a high index of suspicion on behalf of the surgeon. Early recognition and implementation of appropriate therapy are critical and depend on the acquisition of a thorough history and physical examination as well as the accurate interpretation of computed tomographic imaging. Options for management depend on fracture severity and can range from observation or closed reduction in nondisplaced or only minimally displaced fractures, to open reduction and internal fixation in fractures that are comminuted or severely displaced. Currently, there is a lack of level I evidence evaluating the long-term consequences associated with pediatric zygomatic fractures and their management. A review of the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and management of pediatric zygomatic fractures is essential for optimizing function and aesthetic outcomes in children who sustain these injuries.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation/methods , Zygomatic Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Esthetics , Fractures, Comminuted/surgery , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Zygoma/surgery , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
16.
J Craniofac Surg ; 24(3): 929-33, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23714913

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the changes in the etiology, incidence, and pattern of maxillofacial fractures during 2 different study periods in our department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients treated for maxillofacial fractures at our department from January 2000 to December 2009 were included. Data regarding patient's age, sex, etiology of fracture, time of injury, site of fracture, and pattern of fracture were collected and grouped chronologically into two 5-year periods: 2000 to 2004 (period 1) and 2005 to 2009 (period 2); the results of the study during these periods were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: A total of 1131 patients sustained maxillofacial fractures: 422 in the first period and 709 in the second period. During the second period, the male-female ratio increased from 3.35:1 to 3.63:1. Road traffic accidents remained the major etiologic factor, which increased remarkably from 49.3% to 54.6% (P = 0.085), whereas assault-related injuries decreased significantly from 16.8% to 12.4% (P = 0.039). The proportion of patients with mandibular fractures decreased from 59.6% to 55.3% (P = 0.037), whereas the proportion of patients with midfacial fractures increased from 40.4% to 44.7% (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: The changing pattern of maxillofacial fractures in our center is correlated to the socioeconomic status, population mobility, and etiologic factors. Strict enforcement of traffic laws and regulations is still a focal factor in attaining appreciable reduction in maxillofacial fractures associated with road traffic accidents.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Maxillary Fractures/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Population Dynamics/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Social Class , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
17.
Indian J Dent Res ; 34(1): 54-59, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37417058

ABSTRACT

Background: The purpose of the present study was to analyze the etiology, incidence, pattern, and treatment modalities of patients with maxillofacial fractures treated at the Department of Dentistry of a medical college in Pondicherry during the period between June 2011 and June 2019. Materials and Methods: A retrospective epidemiological study of 277 patients treated for maxillofacial fractures between June 2011 and June 2019 was performed. Data regarding age, gender, etiology, site of the fracture, time of injury, presence of associated injuries, treatment modalities, and complications were recorded. Results: A total of 491 maxillofacial fractures were seen in 277 patients. These were 261 males (94.2%) and 16 females (5.8%) with a male to female ratio of 16.3:1. Most of the patients 79.8% were in the age group of 11 to 40 years. Most common cause of injury was Road Traffic Collisions (RTCs; 62.1%), followed by fall (20.2%), assault (14.4%) and others (3.3%). Fractures of the mandible (52.3%) and zygomatic complex (18.9%) were the most common maxillofacial fractures reported in our study. 196 patients sustained associated injuries with a prevalence of soft tissue injury (61.2%). Majority of fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; 71.9%) of patients followed by closed reduction (17.7%) and observation only (10.4%). Postoperative complications were presented in 16.8% of the patients in the study. Conclusion: RTC is the commonest cause of maxillofacial injury with a male predominance in our study. Mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures were the most common. ORIF remains the preferred method of treatment.s.


Subject(s)
Mandibular Fractures , Maxillofacial Injuries , Zygomatic Fractures , Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Mandibular Fractures/surgery , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology , Zygomatic Fractures/complications , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/therapy , India/epidemiology , Accidents, Traffic
18.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 16(11): 1559-62, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23111970

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to investigate epidemiological data (age, gender), sites, etiology and surgical approach of zygomatic fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 9 years retrospective clinical and epidemiologic study evaluated 642 patients treated for zygomatic fracture. There were 569 men and 77 women. The age range was 2 to 86 years with 205 (31.9%) in the 21 to 30 years age group. A number of parameters, including age, gender, cause of injury, site of injury, treatment modalities were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 552 (86%) zygoma fractures and 90 (14%) zygomatic arch fractures. The left zygoma was involved in 309 cases (56%); the right zygoma was involved in 243 cases (44%). Concerning the zygomatic arch, the left side was involved in 43 cases (48%) and the right side in 47 cases (52%). 7% of the patients were younger than 9 years old, about 70% between 10 and 39 years, and 18% between 40 and 59 years, while 4% were older than 60 years. Causes of zygoma fracture were traffic accidents in 151 (26%), assault in 117 (20%), accidental falls in 105 (19%), sports injuries in 56 (10%), home injuries in 45 (8%), work accidents in 34 (6%). Causes of zygomatic arch fractures 28 (29.1%) were assaults in 28 (29.1%), traffic accidents in 20 (21.5%), sports injuries in 14 (15.8%), accidental falls in 11 (14%), domestic accidents in 8 (8.8%) and work accidents in 4 (5%). The access to the fronto-zygomatic suture (74.6%) and the maxillary vestibular approaches (66.8%) were the commonest method of reduction of zygomatic fracture. About arch fractures, the Gillies temporal approach was the most used method of reduction (94.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings, compared with similar studies reported in the literature, support the view that the highest prevalence is in young male patients and, concerning cause, traffic accidents and assault are the most frequent.


Subject(s)
Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology , Zygomatic Fractures/etiology , Accidents , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Violence , Young Adult
19.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 70(2): 396-400, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22260909

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was carried out to identify the occurrence, type, location, and severity of dental injuries (DIs), as well as predictors for DIs, in pediatric patients with facial fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study examined the files of patients aged 16 years or less who had sustained facial fractures during a 12-year period. The outcome variable was DI. The explanatory variables included gender, age, trauma mechanism, and type of facial fracture. Data analysis was carried out with the χ(2) test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients, 119 (59.5%) of whom were boys, met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 12.6 years. A total of 45 patients (22.5%) had DIs. Crown fracture, the most common type of DI, occurred in 59.9% of all DIs. The most common location of crown fractures was in the premolars (37.4% of all crown fractures). Multiple DIs occurred in 71.1% of those with DIs and severe DI in 66.7%. DIs were significantly associated with motor vehicle collision (MVC) (P = .02) and mandibular fracture (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: DIs are common in pediatric patients with facial fracture, often being both multiple and severe. In association with pediatric facial fracture, facial surgeons should be especially alert for crown fractures in the lateral parts of the jaws.


Subject(s)
Facial Bones/injuries , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Tooth Injuries/epidemiology , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Age Factors , Bicuspid/injuries , Bicycling/injuries , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Incisor/injuries , Male , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Nasal Bone/injuries , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Tooth Avulsion/epidemiology , Tooth Crown/injuries , Tooth Injuries/classification , Tooth Mobility/epidemiology , Tooth Root/injuries , Tooth, Deciduous/injuries , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology
20.
Ann Plast Surg ; 68(5): 472-6, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22531402

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate current treatment of zygomatic fractures presenting at a level I trauma center. METHODS: Radiology records over a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed to determine all patients diagnosed with fractures through the zygoma. A total of 1049 computed tomography maxillofacial scans were reviewed which identified 243 patients with fractures through the zygoma. Of these, 200 patients were identified as clinically relevant zygomatic fractures defined as having 3 or more major buttress fractures. RESULTS: Among the 200 patients identified with zygomatic fractures, 132 patients were treated nonoperatively and 68 patients required operative management. In the operative group 31% were treated with a limited (one-buttress) approach. CONCLUSIONS: Review of our management of zygomatic fractures at a level I trauma center found a high incidence of zygomatic fractures (66%) that can be managed nonoperatively without significant complications. There is a select group of zygomatic fractures that can be successfully managed by the experienced surgeon with a limited one-buttress approach.


Subject(s)
Zygomatic Fractures/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Retrospective Studies , Tennessee/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Zygomatic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology , Zygomatic Fractures/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL