Impact of vestibular nerve preservation on facial and hearing outcomes in small vestibular schwannoma surgery: a technical feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Management of small vestibular schwannomas (VSs) remains controversial. When surgery is chosen, the preservation of facial and cochlear nerve function is a priority. In this report, we introduce and evaluate a technique to anatomically preserve the vestibular nerves to minimize manipulation and preserve the function of the facial and cochlear nerves. METHODS: The vestibular nerve preservation technique was prospectively applied to resect small VS tumors in patients with serviceable preoperative hearing (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) class A or B). Clinical and radiological data were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age was 40.4 (12.5) years. Follow-up ranged from 6 weeks to 2 years. The maximum tumor diameter parallel to the internal auditory canal ranged from 10 to 20 mm (mean, 14.9 (3.1) mm). There were three Koos grade 3 and seven Koos grade 2 tumors. Gross total resection was achieved in all cases. Both the facial and cochlear nerves were anatomically preserved in all cases. Postoperatively, 7 patients (70%) remained in the AAO-HNS class A or B hearing category. None of the patients had new vestibular symptoms, and all had House-Brackmann grade 1 facial function. Nervus intermedius dysfunction was observed in 1 patient preoperatively, which worsened postoperatively. Two patients had new nervus intermedius symptoms postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Improvement of facial nerve and hearing outcomes is feasible through the intentional preservation of the vestibular nerves in the resection of small VSs. Longer follow-up is required to rule out tumor recurrence.

A Comparison of Intracochlear Pressures During Ipsilateral and Contralateral Stimulation With a Bone Conduction Implant.

OBJECTIVES: To compare contralateral to ipsilateral stimulation with percutaneous and transcutaneous bone conduction implants. BACKGROUND: Bone conduction implants (BCIs) effectively treat conductive and mixed hearing losses. In some cases, such as in single-sided deafness, the BCI is implanted contralateral to the remaining healthy ear in an attempt to restore some of the benefits provided by binaural hearing. While the benefit of contralateral stimulation has been shown in at least some patients, it is not clear what cues or mechanisms contribute to this function. Previous studies have investigated the motion of the ossicular chain, skull, and round window in response to bone vibration. Here, we extend those reports by reporting simultaneous measurements of cochlear promontory velocity and intracochlear pressures during bone conduction stimulation with two common BCI attachments, and directly compare ipsilateral to contralateral stimulation. METHODS: Fresh-frozen whole human heads were prepared bilaterally with mastoidectomies. Intracochlear pressure (PIC) in the scala vestibuli (PSV) and tympani (PST) was measured with fiber optic pressure probes concurrently with cochlear promontory velocity (VProm) via laser Doppler vibrometry during stimulation provided with a closed-field loudspeaker or a BCI. Stimuli were pure tones between 120 and 10,240 Hz, and response magnitudes and phases for PIC and VProm were measured for air and bone conducted sound presentation. RESULTS: Contralateral stimulation produced lower response magnitudes and longer delays than ipsilateral in all measures, particularly for high-frequency stimulation. Contralateral response magnitudes were lower than ipsilateral response magnitudes by up to 10 to 15 dB above ~2 kHz for a skin-penetrating abutment, which increased to 25 to 30 dB and extended to lower frequencies when applied with a transcutaneous (skin drive) attachment. CONCLUSIONS: Transcranial attenuation and delay suggest that ipsilateral stimulation will be dominant for frequencies over ~1 kHz, and that complex phase interactions will occur during bilateral or bimodal stimulation. These effects indicate a mechanism by which bilateral users could gain some bilateral advantage.

Air- and Bone-Conducted Sources of Feedback With an Active Middle Ear Implant.

OBJECTIVES: Active middle ear implants (AMEI) have been used to treat hearing loss in patients for whom conventional hearing aids are unsuccessful for varied biologic or personal reasons. Several studies have discussed feedback as a potential complication of AMEI usage, though the feedback pathway is not well understood. While reverse propagation of an acoustic signal through the ossicular chain and tympanic membrane constitutes an air-conducted source of feedback, the implanted nature of the device microphone near the mastoid cortex suggests that bone conduction pathways may potentially be another significant factor. This study examines the relative contributions of potential sources of feedback during stimulation with an AMEI. DESIGN: Four fresh-frozen, hemi-sectioned, human cadaver specimens were prepared with a mastoid antrostomy and atticotomy to visualize the posterior incus body. A Carina active middle ear implant actuator (Cochlear Ltd., Boulder, CO) was coupled to the incus by two means: (1) a stereotactic arm mounted independently of the specimen and (2) a fixation bracket anchored directly to the mastoid cortical bone. The actuator was driven with pure-tone frequencies in 1/4 octave steps from 500 to 6000 Hz. Acoustic sound intensity in the ear canal was measured with a probe tube microphone (Bruel & Kjær, Nærum, Denmark). Bone-conducted vibration was quantified with a single-axis laser Doppler vibrometer (Polytec Inc., Irvine, CA) from both a piece of reflective tape placed on the skin overlying the mastoid and a bone-anchored titanium screw and pedestal (Cochlear Ltd., Centennial, CO) implanted in the cortical mastoid bone. RESULTS: Microphone measurements revealed ear-canal pressures of 60-89 dB SPL, peaking in the frequency range below 2 kHz. Peak LDV measurements were greatest on the mastoid bone (0.32-0.79 mm/s with mounting bracket and 0.21-0.36 mm/s with the stereotactic suspension); peak measurements on the skin ranged from 0.05 to 0.15 mm/s with the bracket and 0.03 to 0.13 mm/s with stereotactic suspension. CONCLUSION: AMEI produce both air- and bone-conducted signals of adequate strength to be detected by the implanted device microphone, potentially resulting in reamplification. Understanding the relative contribution of these sources may play an important role in the development of targeted mitigation algorithms, as well as surgical techniques emphasizing acoustic isolation.

Auditory Localization Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Single-Sided Deafness: The Challenges and Limitations of Current Outcome Metrics.

HYPOTHESIS: Acoustic localization accuracy metrics currently employed in clinical literature both overestimate and underestimate performance benefit of cochlear implantation (CI) for single-sided deafness (SSD). BACKGROUND: Although localization in SSD with CI has been investigated, performance characterization has relied heavily on average error. Although attractively concise, this measure may misrepresent performance. Here, we characterize frequency-specific localization on a granular level in subjects with CI for SSD as a critical analysis of localization outcome metrics. METHODS: Eight CI recipients with SSD were recruited. Stimuli of broadband (BBN) and narrowband noise (NBN) at low (500 Hz), mid (1000 Hz), and high (4000 Hz) frequencies were presented in a semianechoic chamber. Localization accuracy was quantified in mean angular error (MAE) and linear regression slope. RESULTS: Use of a CI for SSD subjects improved localization performance by slope for all stimuli ( p ≤ 0.0033) to a level that was equal to normal-hearing controls at 1 and 4 kHz ( p ≥ 0.2281). MAE was also significantly improved for SSD subjects using CI for BBN stimuli ( p ≪ 0.0001); however, no statistically significant improvement in MAE was seen for NBN ( p ≥ 0.5773) with CI use. Descriptive analysis of individual subject performance highlights the reasons for contradictory results. CONCLUSION: There is inherent challenge in characterizing localization benefit for individuals with CI for SSD. Our data demonstrate the limitations of utilization of average error as the sole metric for outcome benefit. We emphasize the importance of continued research investigating alternative outcome measures as we work toward a more refined understanding of the potential benefits and limitations of cochlear implantation for SSD.

Effects of Varying Laser Parameters During Laser Stapedotomy on Intracochlear Pressures.

OBJECTIVE: Sensorineural hearing loss is a known complication of stapes surgery. We previously showed that laser stapedotomy can result in intracochlear pressures that are comparable to high sound pressure levels. Optimizing laser settings to those that correspond with the lowest pressure changes may mitigate risk for postoperative hearing loss. Here we quantify the effects of various laser parameters on intracochlear pressures and test the hypothesis that intracochlear pressure changes are proportional to the laser energy delivered. STUDY DESIGN: Basic and translational science. SETTING: Cadaveric dissection and basic science laboratory. METHODS: Cadaveric human heads underwent mastoidectomies. Intracochlear pressures were measured via fiber-optic pressure probes placed in scala vestibuli and tympani. Pulses of varied stimulus power and duration from a 980-nm diode laser were applied to the stapes footplate. RESULTS: Sustained high-intensity pressures were observed in the cochlea during all laser applications. Observed pressure magnitudes increased monotonically with laser energy and rose linearly for lower stimulus durations and powers, but there was increased variability for laser applications of longer duration (200-300 ms) and/or higher power (8 W). CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm that significant pressure changes occur during laser stapedotomy, which we hypothesize may cause injury. Overall energy delivered depends predictably on duration and power, but surgeons should use caution at the highest stimulus levels and longest pulse durations due to the increasing variability in intracochlear pressure under these stimulus conditions. While the risk to hearing from increased intracochlear pressures from laser stapedotomy remains unclear, these results affirm the need to optimize laser settings to avoid unintended injury.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Vestibular Schwannoma Management: A Single Institution Review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate social determinants of health and their effect on the management of vestibular schwannoma (VS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients >18 years old with sporadic VS newly diagnosed between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging; audiogram; treatment recommendations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in treatment recommendations for patients based on their social determinants of health, including race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: A total of 811 patients were included in analysis. Patients with a higher area deprivation index (ADI) presented with larger tumors. A higher ADI was associated with a higher likelihood of recommending radiation (or the option of surgery or radiation) compared with a recommendation of surgery alone. Tumor grade and patient age were significantly associated with treatment recommendation. Older age was associated with a recommendation of observation alone or a recommendation of radiation. Higher tumor grade was associated with a recommendation of surgery. There was a trend for higher hearing class to be associated with a recommendation of surgery, but this did not reach statistical significance. Race, ethnicity, and gender were not significantly associated with treatment recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher levels of disadvantage presented with higher tumor grade, suggesting that access to care influences diagnosis. Factors including age, ADI, and tumor grade were associated with treatment recommendation.

Measurement and Mitigation of Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.

HYPOTHESIS: High intracochlear pressure transients associated with cochlear implant placement are reduced with smaller, non-styleted arrays, and longer insertion durations. BACKGROUND: With increasing focus on hearing preservation during cochlear implant surgery, atraumatic technique is of the utmost importance. Previous studies revealed that high intensity pressure transients can be generated during the insertion of implant electrodes. Resulting acoustic trauma may be one contributing factor to postoperative loss of residual hearing. METHODS: Thirty ears in cadaveric specimens were surgically prepared with placement of intracochlear pressure sensors. Sequential implant insertions were made over 10, 30, or 60 seconds using seven randomly ordered electrode styles. Pressures were also measured during common post-insertion electrode manipulations and removal. Measurements were compared between electrode styles and characteristics using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Implant insertion and post-insertion manipulations produced high-intensity pressure transients with all electrodes tested, with some measurements exceeding 170 dB peak SPL. Average peak pressures were significantly lower for straight, non-stylet electrodes (p << 0.001). The likelihood of generating transients was lowest with the slowest insertions (p << 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implant insertion can generate transients in intralabyrinthine pressure levels equivalent to high intensity, impulsive acoustic stimuli known to cause hearing loss. Although transients were observed in all conditions, exposure may be mitigated by using non-styleted electrodes and slow insertion speeds. Additional surgical manipulations can also produce similar high-pressure events. Results from this investigation suggest that use of non-styleted electrodes, slow but steady insertion speeds, and avoidance of post-insertional manipulations are important to reduce cochlear trauma.

Implantable Hearing Aids: Where are we in 2020?

Beginning in the late 20th century, implantable hearing aids were developed and used as an alternative for individuals who were unable to tolerate conventional hearing aids. Since that time, several devices have been developed, with four currently remaining on the international market (Med-el Vibrant Soundbridge, Envoy Esteem, Ototronix MAXUM, and Cochlear Carina). This review will briefly examine the history of middle ear implant development, describe current available devices, evaluate the benefits and limits of the technology, and consider the future directions of research in the field of implantable hearing aids.

Risks of Intracochlear Pressures From Laser Stapedotomy.

HYPOTHESIS: Surgical manipulations during laser stapedotomy can produce intracochlear pressure changes comparable to pressures created by high-intensity acoustic stimuli. BACKGROUND: New-onset sensorineural hearing loss is a known risk of stapes surgery and may result from pressure changes from laser use or other surgical manipulations. Here, we test the hypothesis that high sound pressure levels are generated in the cochlea during laser stapedotomy. METHODS: Human cadaveric heads underwent mastoidectomy. Fiber-optic sensors were placed in scala tympani and vestibuli to measure intracochlear pressures during key steps in stapedotomy surgery, including cutting stapedius tendon, lasering of stapedial crurae, crural downfracture, and lasering of the footplate. RESULTS: Key steps in laser stapedotomy produced high-intensity pressures in the cochlea. Pressure transients were comparable to intracochlear pressures measured in response to high intensity impulsive acoustic stimuli. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that surgical manipulations during laser stapedotomy can create significant pressure changes within the cochlea, suggesting laser application should be minimized and alternatives to mechanical downfracture should be investigated. Results from this investigation suggest that intracochlear pressure transients from stapedotomy may be of sufficient magnitude to cause damage to the sensory epithelium and affirm the importance of limiting surgical traumatic exposures.

Characterizing Insertion Pressure Profiles During Cochlear Implantation: Simultaneous Fluoroscopy and Intracochlear Pressure Measurements.

BACKGROUND: Combined electrical-acoustical stimulation (EAS) has gained popularity as patients with residual hearing are increasingly undergoing cochlear implantation. Preservation of residual hearing correlates with hearing outcomes, but loss of hearing occurs in a subset of these patients. Several mechanisms have been proposed as causing this hearing loss; we have previously described high amplitude pressure transients, equivalent to high-level noise exposures, in the inner ear during electrode insertion. The source of these transients has not been identified. METHODS: Cadaveric human heads were prepared with an extended facial recess. Fiber-optic pressure sensors were inserted into the scala vestibuli and scala tympani to measure intracochlear pressures. Two cochlear implant (CI) electrode styles (straight and perimodiolar) were inserted during time-synced intracochlear pressures and video fluoroscopy measurements. RESULTS: CI electrode insertions produced pressure transients in the cochlea up to 160 to 170 dB pSPL equivalent for both styles, consistent with previous results. However, the position of the electrode within the cochlea when transients were generated differed (particularly contact with the medial or lateral walls). CONCLUSIONS: These results begin to elucidate the insertion pressure profiles of CI electrodes, which can be used to improve CI electrode designs and facilitate "silent-insertions" to improve chances of hearing preservation.

Bilateral Ear Canal Cholesteatoma with Underlying Type I First Branchial Cleft Anomalies.

OBJECTIVES:: To describe a case of bilateral ear canal cholesteatomas in the setting of underlying first branchial cleft cyst anomalies and to review the pathophysiology underlying the development of external auditory canal cholesteatomas from branchial cleft cyst abnormalities. METHODS AND RESULTS:: We present a case study of a 61-year-old man who presented with chronic right-sided hearing loss and left-sided postauricular drainage. Clinical evaluation, radiographic work-up, and pathologic analysis confirmed a diagnosis of bilateral ear canal cholesteatoma in the setting of underlying first branchial cleft cyst anomalies. The patient's clinical course, surgical treatment, and management considerations are discussed here. CONCLUSION:: Ear canal cholesteatoma represents a rare clinical disease entity deserving a thorough initial assessment. Careful consideration of underlying diseases that result in chronic inflammation, such as branchial cleft lesions, should be included in the differential diagnosis of idiopathic canal cholesteatoma in the absence of prior otologic surgery or trauma.

Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: Effect of Micro-mechanical Control on Limiting Pressure Trauma.

HYPOTHESIS: Use of micro-mechanical control during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion will result in reduced number and magnitude of pressure transients when compared with standard insertion by hand. INTRODUCTION: With increasing focus on hearing preservation during CI surgery, atraumatic electrode insertion is of the utmost importance. It has been established that large intracochlear pressure spikes can be generated during the insertion of implant electrodes. Here, we examine the effect of using a micro-mechanical insertion control tool on pressure trauma exposures during implantation. METHODS: Human cadaveric heads were surgically prepared with an extended facial recess. Electrodes from three manufacturers were placed both by using a micro-mechanical control tool and by hand. Insertions were performed at three different rates: 0.2 mm/s, 1.2 mm/s, and 2 mm/s (n = 20 each). Fiber-optic sensors measured pressures in scala vestibuli and tympani. RESULTS: Electrode insertion produced pressure transients up to 174 dB SPL. ANOVA revealed that pressures were significantly lower when using the micro-mechanical control device compared with insertion by hand (p << 0.001). No difference was noted across electrode type or speed. Chi-square analysis showed a significantly lower proportion of insertions contained pressure spikes when the control system was used (p << 0.001). CONCLUSION: Results confirm previous data that suggest CI electrode insertion can cause pressure transients with intensities similar to those elicited by high-level sounds. Results suggest that the use of a micro-mechanical insertion control system may mitigate trauma from pressure events, both by reducing the amplitude and the number of pressure spikes resulting from CI electrode insertion.

Establishing an Animal Model of Single-Sided Deafness in Chinchilla lanigera.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To characterize changes in brainstem neural activity following unilateral deafening in an animal model. (2) To compare brainstem neural activity from unilaterally deafened animals with that of normal-hearing controls. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled animal study. SETTING: Vivarium and animal research facilities. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The effect of single-sided deafness on brainstem activity was studied in Chinchilla lanigera. Animals were unilaterally deafened via gentamycin injection into the middle ear, which was verified by loss of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). Animals underwent measurement of ABR and local field potential in the inferior colliculus. RESULTS: Four animals underwent chemical deafening, with 2 normal-hearing animals as controls. ABRs confirmed unilateral loss of auditory function. Deafened animals demonstrated symmetric local field potential responses that were distinctly different than the contralaterally dominated responses of the inferior colliculus seen in normal-hearing animals. CONCLUSION: We successfully developed a model for unilateral deafness to investigate effects of single-sided deafness on brainstem plasticity. This preliminary investigation serves as a foundation for more comprehensive studies that will include cochlear implantation and manipulation of binaural cues, as well as functional behavioral tests.

Comparison of Transmastoid and Middle Fossa Approaches for Superior Canal Dehiscence Repair: A Multi-institutional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes for patients undergoing a transmastoid approach versus a middle fossa craniotomy approach with plugging and/or resurfacing for repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Outcome measures include symptom resolution, hearing, operative time, hospital stay, complications, and revision rates. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective comparative cohort study. SETTINGS: Three tertiary neurotology centers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All adult patients undergoing repair for superior canal dehiscence between 2006 and 2017 at 3 neurotology centers were included. Demographics and otologic history collected by chart review. Imaging, audiometric data, and vestibular evoked myogenic potential measurements were also collected for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients (74 ears) were included in the study. Twenty-one patients underwent middle fossa craniotomy repair (mean age, 47.9 years), and 47 underwent transmastoid repair (mean age, 48.0 years). There were no significant differences in age or sex distribution between the groups. The transmastoid group experienced a significantly shorter duration of hospitalization and lower recurrence rate as compared with the middle fossa craniotomy group (3.8% vs 33%). Both groups experienced improvement in noise-induced vertigo, autophony, pulsatile tinnitus, and nonspecific vertigo. There was no significant difference among symptom resolution between groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in audiometric outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both the transmastoid approach and the middle fossa craniotomy approach for repair of superior canal dehiscence offer symptom resolution with minimal risk. The transmastoid approach was associated with shorter hospital stays and lower recurrence rate as compared with the middle fossa craniotomy approach.

Effectiveness of Transmastoid Plugging for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

Objectives (1) Evaluate changes in subjective symptoms in patients following transmastoid canal plugging for superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) syndrome. (2) Quantify changes in hearing in patients who have undergone transmastoid canal plugging for SSCD syndrome. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Single tertiary care institution. Subjects and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with SSCD who underwent repair with canal plugging via a transmastoid approach between January 2012 and January 2017. Symptom severity was assessed prospectively (autophony, sound/pressure-induced vertigo, disequilibrium, aural fullness, and pulsatile tinnitus) and after surgery. Pure-tone and speech audiometry were measured before and after surgery. Two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to evaluate changes in subjective symptoms and audiometric outcomes. Results Seventeen patients (19 ears) met inclusion criteria. The superior canal was successfully plugged via the transmastoid approach in all cases. Patients reported a statistically significant improvement in autophony, vertigo, aural fullness, and pulsatile tinnitus ( P < .01), without significant improvement in disequilibrium rating ( P = .06). There were no changes noted in pure-tone average or word recognition score; however, there was a statistically significant improvement in air-bone gap at 250 Hz of 10.9 dB ( P = .04) with 12.9-dB improvement in air conduction thresholds ( P = .02) and no difference (0.9 dB, P = .9) in bone conduction thresholds. Conclusion In our study, patients with SSCD demonstrated excellent hearing outcomes and resolution of most otologic symptoms after surgical repair. Transmastoid canal plugging, which has been described to date only in smaller case series, is a safe and effective alternative to the traditional middle cranial fossa approach.

Lateral Semicircular Canal Pressures During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: a Possible Mechanism for Postoperative Vestibular Loss.

HYPOTHESIS: Insertion of cochlear implant electrodes generates transient pressure spikes within the vestibular labyrinth equivalent to high-intensity acoustic stimuli. BACKGROUND: Though cochlear implant (CI) surgery is regarded as having low risk of impacting the vestibular system, several studies have documented changes in vestibular function after implantation. The mechanism of these changes is not understood. We have previously established that large, potentially damaging pressure transients can be generated in the cochlea during electrode insertion, but whether pressure transients occur within the vestibular labyrinth has yet to be determined. Here, we quantify the exposure of the vestibular system to potentially damaging pressure transients during CI surgery. METHODS: Five human cadaveric heads were prepared with an extended facial recess and implanted sequentially with eight different CI electrode styles via a round window approach. Fiber-optic sensors measured intralabyrinthine pressures in scala vestibuli, scala tympani, and the lateral semicircular canal during insertions. RESULTS: Electrode insertion produced a range of high-intensity pressure spikes simultaneously in the cochlea and lateral semicircular canal with all electrodes tested. Pressure transients recorded were found to be significantly higher in the vestibular labyrinth than the cochlea and occurred at peak levels known to cause acoustic trauma. CONCLUSION: Insertion of CI electrodes can produce transients in intralabyrinthine fluid pressure levels equivalent to high-intensity, impulsive acoustic stimuli. Results from this investigation affirm the importance of atraumatic surgical techniques and suggest that in addition to the cochlea, the vestibular system is potentially exposed to damaging fluid pressure waves during cochlear implantation.

Intracochlear Pressures in Simulated Otitis Media With Effusion: A Temporal Bone Study.

HYPOTHESIS: Simulated otitis media with effusion reduces intracochlear pressures comparable to umbo velocity. BACKGROUND: Otitis media with effusion is a common cause of temporary hearing loss, particularly in children, producing deficits of 30 to 40 dB. Previous studies measured the effects of simulated effusion on ossicular mechanics; however, no studies have measured cochlear stimulation directly. Here, we compare pressures in the scala vestibuli and tympani to umbo velocity, before and after induction of simulated effusion in cadaveric human specimens. METHODS: Eight cadaveric, hemi-cephalic human heads were prepared with complete mastoidectomies. Intracochlear pressures were measured with fiber optic pressure probes, and umbo velocity measured via laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV). Stimuli were pure tones (0.1-14 kHz) presented in the ear canal via a custom speculum sealed with a glass cover slip. Effusion was simulated by filling the mastoid cavity and middle ear space with water. RESULTS: Acoustic stimulation with middle ear effusion resulted in decreased umbo velocity up to ∼26 dB, whereas differential pressure (PDiff) at the base of the cochlea decreased by only ∼16 dB. CONCLUSION: Simulating effusion leads to a frequency-dependent reduction in intracochlear sound pressure levels consistent with audiological presentation and prior reports. Results reveal that intracochlear pressure measurements (PSV and PST) decrease less than expected, and less than the decrease in PDiff. The observed decrease in umbo velocity is greater than in the differential intracochlear pressures, suggesting that umbo velocity overestimates the induced conductive hearing loss. These results suggest that an alternate sound conduction pathway transmits sound to the inner ear during effusion.

Intracochlear Measurements of Interaural Time and Level Differences Conveyed by Bilateral Bone Conduction Systems.

HYPOTHESIS: Intracochlear pressures (PIC) and stapes velocity (Vstap) elicited by bilaterally placed bone-anchored hearing devices (BAHD) will be systematically modulated by imposed interaural time (ITD) and level differences (ILD), demonstrating the potential for users of bilateral BAHD to access these binaural cues. BACKGROUND: BAHD are traditionally implanted unilaterally under the assumption that transcranial cross-talk limits interaural differences. Recent studies have demonstrated improvements in binaural and spatial performance with bilateral BAHD; however, objective measures of binaural cues from bilateral BAHDs are lacking. METHODS: Bone-conduction transducers were coupled to both mastoids of cadaveric specimens via implanted titanium abutments. PIC and Vstap were measured using intracochlear pressure probes and laser Doppler vibrometry, respectively, during stimulation with pure-tone stimuli of varied frequency (250-4000 Hz) under ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral ITD (-1 to 1 ms) and ILD (-20 to 20 dB) conditions. RESULTS: Bilateral stimulation produced constructive and destructive interference patterns that varied dramatically with ITD and stimulus frequency. Variation of ITD led to large variation of PIC and Vstap, with opposing effects in ipsilateral and contralateral ears expected to lead to "ITD to ILD conversion." Variation of ILD produced more straightforward (monotonic) variations of PIC and Vstap, with ipsilateral-favoring ILD producing higher PIC and Vstap than contralateral-favoring. CONCLUSION: Variation of ITDs and ILDs conveyed by BAHDs systematically modulated cochlear inputs. While transcranial cross-talk leads to complex interactions that depend on cue type and stimulus frequency, binaural disparities potentiate binaural benefit, providing a basis for improved sound localization and speech-in-noise perception.

Semicircular Canal Pressure Changes During High-intensity Acoustic Stimulation.

HYPOTHESIS: Acoustic stimulation generates measurable sound pressure levels in the semicircular canals. BACKGROUND: High-intensity acoustic stimuli can cause hearing loss and balance disruptions. To examine the propagation of acoustic stimuli to the vestibular end-organs, we simultaneously measured fluid pressure in the cochlea and semicircular canals during both air- and bone-conducted sound presentation. METHODS: Five full-cephalic human cadaveric heads were prepared bilaterally with a mastoidectomy and extended facial recess. Vestibular pressures were measured within the superior, lateral, and posterior semicircular canals, and referenced to intracochlear pressure within the scala vestibuli with fiber-optic pressure probes. Pressures were measured concurrently with laser Doppler vibrometry measurements of stapes velocity during stimulation with both air- and bone-conduction. Stimuli were pure tones between 100 Hz and 14 kHz presented with custom closed-field loudspeakers for air-conducted sounds and via commercially available bone-anchored device for bone-conducted sounds. RESULTS: Pressures recorded in the superior, lateral, and posterior semicircular canals in response to sound stimulation were equal to or greater in magnitude than those recorded in the scala vestibuli (up to 20 dB higher). The pressure magnitudes varied across canals in a frequency-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: High sound pressure levels were recorded in the semicircular canals with sound stimulation, suggesting that similar acoustical energy is transmitted to the semicircular canals and the cochlea. Since these intralabyrinthine pressures exceed intracochlear pressure levels, our results suggest that the vestibular end-organs may also be at risk for injury during exposure to high-intensity acoustic stimuli known to cause trauma in the auditory system.

Drill-induced Cochlear Injury During Otologic Surgery: Intracochlear Pressure Evidence of Acoustic Trauma.

HYPOTHESIS: Drilling on the incus produces intracochlear pressure changes comparable to pressures created by high-intensity acoustic stimuli. BACKGROUND: New-onset sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) following mastoid surgery can occur secondary to inadvertent drilling on the ossicular chain. To investigate this, we test the hypothesis that high sound pressure levels are generated when a high-speed drill contacts the incus. METHODS: Human cadaveric heads underwent mastoidectomy, and fiber-optic sensors were placed in scala tympani and vestibuli to measure intracochlear pressures (PIC). Stapes velocities (Vstap) were measured using single-axis laser Doppler vibrometry. PIC and Vstap were measured while drilling on the incus. Four-millimeter diamond and cutting burrs were used at drill speeds of 20k, 50k, and 80k Hz. RESULTS: No differences in peak equivalent ear canal noise exposures (134-165 dB SPL) were seen between drill speeds or burr types. Root-mean-square PIC amplitude calculated in third-octave bandwidths around 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz revealed equivalent ear canal (EAC) pressures up to 110 to 112 dB SPL. A statistically significant trend toward increasing noise exposure with decreasing drill speed was seen. No significant differences were noted between burr types. Calculations of equivalent EAC pressure from Vstap were significantly higher at 101 to 116 dB SPL. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that incidental drilling on the ossicular chain can generate PIC comparable to high-intensity acoustic stimulation. Drill speed, but not burr type, significantly affected the magnitude of PIC. Inadvertent drilling on the ossicular chain produces intense cochlear stimulation that could cause SNHL.