RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Services provided by the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) were interrupted in 2012 when Superstorm Sandy struck New York State (NYS). The present study evaluates the impact on WIC providers. DESIGN: A focus group, telephone interviews and anonymous online survey were conducted. Qualitative data were analysed by coding transcribed text into key words and identifying major and minor themes for strengths, challenges and recommendations using national public health preparedness capabilities. Survey responses were analysed quantitatively; reported challenges were classified by preparedness capability. SETTING: The focus group was held at a 2014 regional WIC meeting. Interviews and a survey were conducted via telephone in 2014 and online in 2015, respectively. SUBJECTS: WIC staff representing New York City and three NYS counties. RESULTS: In the focus group (n 12) and interviews (n 6), 'emergency operations coordination' was the most cited capability as a strength, 'environmental health protection' (against environmental hazards) as a challenge and 'flexibility' (on rules and procedures) as a recommendation. In the survey (n 24), the capability 'information sharing' was most often cited as a challenge. Most staff (66·6 %) reported their programmes were at least somewhat prepared for future weather-related disasters. Only 16·7 % indicated having practiced a work-related emergency response plan since Sandy. Staff who practiced an emergency response plan were more likely to indicate they were prepared (P < 0·05). CONCLUSIONS: The study identified WIC programme areas requiring preparedness improvements. The research methodology can be utilized to assess the continuity of other public health services during disasters.
Asunto(s)
Tormentas Ciclónicas , Planificación en Desastres , Asistencia Alimentaria , Salud Pública , Asistencia Alimentaria/organización & administración , Asistencia Alimentaria/normas , Asistencia Alimentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , New YorkRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Government datasets are newly available on open data platforms that are publicly accessible, available in nonproprietary formats, free of charge, and with unlimited use and distribution rights. They provide opportunities for health research, but their quality and usability are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe available open health data, identify whether data are presented in a way that is aligned with best practices and usable for researchers, and examine differences across platforms. DESIGN: Two reviewers systematically reviewed a random sample of data offerings on NYC OpenData (New York City, all offerings, n = 37), Health Data NY (New York State, 25% sample, n = 71), and HealthData.gov (US Department of Health and Human Services, 5% sample, n = 75), using a standard coding guide. SETTING: Three open health data platforms at the federal, New York State, and New York City levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data characteristics from the coding guide were aggregated into summary indices for intrinsic data quality, contextual data quality, adherence to the Dublin Core metadata standards, and the 5-star open data deployment scheme. RESULTS: One quarter of the offerings were structured datasets; other presentation styles included charts (14.7%), documents describing data (12.0%), maps (10.9%), and query tools (7.7%). Health Data NY had higher intrinsic data quality (P < .001), contextual data quality (P < .001), and Dublin Core metadata standards adherence (P < .001). All met basic "web availability" open data standards; fewer met higher standards of "hyperlinked to other data." CONCLUSIONS: Although all platforms need improvement, they already provide readily available data for health research. Sustained effort on improving open data websites and metadata is necessary for ensuring researchers use these data, thereby increasing their research value.
Asunto(s)
Exactitud de los Datos , Presentación de Datos/normas , Programas de Gobierno/normas , Informática en Salud Pública/normas , Programas de Gobierno/métodos , Humanos , New York , Informática en Salud Pública/métodosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Public health climate change adaptation planning is an urgent priority requiring stakeholder feedback. The 10 Essential Public Health Services can be applied to adaptation activities. OBJECTIVE: To develop a state health department climate and health adaptation plan as informed by stakeholder feedback. DESIGN: With Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) implemented a 2010-2013 climate and health planning process, including 7 surveys on perceptions and adaptation priorities. PARTICIPANTS: New York State Department of Health program managers participated in initial (n = 41, denominator unknown) and follow-up (72.2%) needs assessments. Surveillance system information was collected from 98.1% of surveillance system managers. For adaptation prioritization surveys, participants included 75.4% of NYSDOH leaders; 60.3% of local health departments (LHDs); and 53.7% of other stakeholders representing environmental, governmental, health, community, policy, academic, and business organizations. Interviews were also completed with 38.9% of other stakeholders. RESULTS: In 2011 surveys, 34.1% of state health program directors believed that climate change would impact their program priorities. However, 84.6% of state health surveillance system managers provided ideas for using databases for climate and health monitoring/surveillance. In 2012 surveys, 46.5% of state health leaders agreed they had sufficient information about climate and health compared to 17.1% of LHDs (P = .0046) and 40.9% of other stakeholders (nonsignificant difference). Significantly fewer (P < .0001) LHDs (22.9%) were incorporating or considering incorporating climate and health into planning compared to state health leaders (55.8%) and other stakeholders (68.2%). Stakeholder groups agreed on the 4 highest priority adaptation categories including core public health activities such as surveillance, coordination/collaboration, education, and policy development. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback from diverse stakeholders was utilized by NYSDOH to develop its Climate and Health Strategic Map in 2013. The CDC Building Resilience Against Climate Effects (BRACE) framework and funding provides a collaborative model for state climate and health adaptation planning.
Asunto(s)
Personal Administrativo , Cambio Climático , Retroalimentación , Planificación en Salud , Salud Pública , Salud Ambiental , Humanos , New York , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/provisión & distribución , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/normas , COVID-19/prevención & control , Guías como Asunto , Equidad en Salud/ética , Equidad en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política Pública , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Public health surveillance conducted by health departments in the United States has improved in completeness and timeliness owing to electronic laboratory reporting. However, the collection of detailed clinical information about reported cases, which is necessary to confirm the diagnosis, to understand transmission, or to determine disease-related risk factors, is still heavily dependent on manual processes. The increasing prevalence and functionality of electronic health record (EHR) systems in the United States present important opportunities to advance public health surveillance. EHR data have the potential to further increase the breadth, detail, timeliness, and completeness of public health surveillance and thereby provide better data to guide public health interventions. EHRs also provide a unique opportunity to expand the role and vision of current surveillance efforts and to help bridge the gap between public health practice and clinical medicine.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Salud Pública/métodos , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Hepatitis Viral Humana/epidemiología , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Administración en Salud Pública/métodos , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify children vaccinated following an alternative vaccine schedule using immunization information system data and determine the impact of alternative schedule use on vaccine coverage. STUDY DESIGN: Children born in New York State, outside New York City, between January 1, 2009 and August 14, 2011 were assessed for vaccination patterns consistent with use of an alternative schedule. Children who by 9 months of age had at least 3 vaccination visits recorded in the statewide mandatory immunization information system after 41 days of age were classified as either attempting to conform to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published recommended vaccination schedule or an alternative schedule. The number of vaccination visits and up-to-date status at age 9 months were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 222 628 children studied, the proportion of children following an alternative schedule was 25%. These children were significantly less likely to be up-to-date at age 9 months (15%) compared with those conforming to the routine schedule (90%, P < .05). Children following an alternative schedule on average had about 2 extra vaccine visits compared with children following a routine schedule (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Almost 1 in 4 children in this study appear to be intentionally deviating from the routine schedule. Intentional deviation leads to poor vaccination coverage leaving children vulnerable to infection and increasing the potential for vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks.
Asunto(s)
Esquemas de Inmunización , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , New York , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Seguridad , Negativa del Paciente al TratamientoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Governments are rapidly developing open data platforms to improve transparency and make information more accessible. New York is a leader, with currently the only state platform devoted to health. Although these platforms could build public health departments' capabilities to serve more researchers, agencies have little guidance on releasing meaningful and usable data. OBJECTIVE: Structured focus groups with researchers and practitioners collected stakeholder feedback on potential uses of open health data and New York's open data strategy. SETTING AND DESIGN: Researchers and practitioners attended a 1-day November 2013 workshop on New York State's open health data resources. After learning about the state's open data platform and vision for open health data, participants were organized into 7 focus groups to discuss the essential elements of open data sets, practical challenges to obtaining and using health data, and potential uses of open data. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 33 quantitative health researchers from State University of New York campuses and private partners and 10 practitioners from the New York State Department of Health. RESULTS: There was low awareness of open data, with 67% of researchers reporting never using open data portals prior to the workshop. Participants were interested in data sets that were geocoded, longitudinal, or aggregated to small area granularity and capabilities to link multiple data sets. Multiple environmental conditions and barriers hinder their capacity to use health data for research. Although open data platforms cannot address all barriers, they provide multiple opportunities for public health research and practice, and participants were overall positive about the state's efforts to release open data. CONCLUSIONS: Open data are not ideal for some researchers because they do not contain individually identifiable data, indicating a need for tiered data release strategies. However, they do provide important new opportunities to facilitate research and foster collaborations among agencies, researchers, and practitioners.
Asunto(s)
Acceso a la Información , Salud Pública , Grupos Focales , Humanos , New York , Gobierno EstatalRESUMEN
The New York State Department of Health (DOH) has a long history of biomedical research, public health policy and program development, peer-reviewed scholarship, and teaching. Its evolution as an academic health department advanced significantly when the University at Albany and DOH formed the School of Public Health Sciences in 1985 to further develop these functions while formally training the next generation of public health workers. The School, renamed in 1990 as the School of Public Health (SPH), was initially located within the DOH with its staff as the founding faculty. The curriculum was heavily influenced by public health practice imperatives. The SPH has evolved to have an independent campus and full-time academic faculty, but the DOH remains closely linked. The relationship is governed by a memorandum of understanding that commits both partners to provide substantial and continuing resources to the SPH. The SPH brings value to the DOH's mission to improve the health of the state's citizens by providing an academic focus to problems faced in health department practice settings. The opportunity to teach and be involved in an academic environment increases the DOH's ability to recruit, retain, and improve the skill level of its professional and scientific staff and thereby improve its ability to assess health problems and to design and evaluate public health programs. The SPH also provides training and support to county health departments and nongovernment organizations, which further the DOH's mission, through continuing education programs and an online MPH degree program. International exchanges including those with China, Vietnam, and the Republic of Georgia have enriched the academic environment. Challenges include maintaining sufficient full-time faculty members, the need for the SPH to take on broader public health issues than those applicable to New York, and the shrinkage of the DOH's workforce and departure of many senior scientists who served as faculty.
Asunto(s)
Educación en Salud Pública Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica de Salud Pública , Escuelas de Salud Pública/organización & administración , Educación en Salud Pública Profesional/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Educacionales , New York , Gobierno EstatalRESUMEN
The New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) collected information about hospitalized patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) during October 2009-May 2010, statewide (excluding New York City), to examine a possible relationship with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination. NYSDOH established a Clinical Network of neurologists and 150 hospital neurology units. Hospital discharge data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) were used to evaluate completeness of reporting from the Clinical Network. A total of 140 confirmed or probable GBS cases were identified: 81 (58%) from both systems, 10 (7%) from Clinical Network only, and 49 (35%) from SPARCS-only. Capture-recapture methods estimated that 6 cases might have been missed by both systems. Clinical Network median reporting time was 12 days versus 131 days for SPARCS. In public health emergencies in New York State, a Clinical Network may provide timely data, but in our study such data were less complete than traditional hospital discharge data.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Programas de Inmunización , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vigilancia de la Población , Vacunación , Sesgo , Notificación de Enfermedades , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , New York/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Agencias Estatales de Desarrollo y Planificación de la Salud/tendencias , Fiebre Tifoidea/diagnóstico , Adulto , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Fiebre/etiología , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Infectología , Masculino , New York/epidemiología , Salmonella typhi/patogenicidad , Fiebre Tifoidea/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
New York State Public Health Law §2819, requiring the mandatory public reporting of health care-associated infections, was enacted in July 2005. This article describes key provisions in the legislation, New York State health care-associated infection program development, the rationale for selection of the National Healthcare Safety Network for reporting, and lessons learned.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Notificación Obligatoria , Confidencialidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Agencias Gubernamentales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Agencias Gubernamentales/organización & administración , Humanos , Legislación Médica , New York , Desarrollo de Programa , Gobierno EstatalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in H1N1 influenza vaccine distribution strategies that may impact the ability to rapidly administer vaccine during a pandemic or public health emergency. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of immunization data in the New York State Immunization Information System (NYSIIS). SETTING: Analysis of existing NYSIIS data. PARTICIPANTS: Children and adolescents younger than 19 years for whom information on at least 1 H1N1 influenza vaccine was present in NYSIIS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Median time to administer vaccines to children and adolescents younger than 19 years by December 31, 2009, by county; venue of H1N1 vaccine administration (local health department [LHD] or private medical provider); comparison of immunization-seeking behavior for routine childhood vaccinations and H1N1 vaccine. RESULTS: A total of 459 189 first or only doses of H1N1 influenza vaccine were recorded in NYSIIS as being administered to New York State, outside of New York City, children aged less than 19 years, between October 2, 2009, and December 31, 2009. Overall, LHD administered 31% of H1N1 vaccine doses; in counties having population less than 100,000, LHD administered 63% of H1N1 doses compared with 23% in counties having population more than 100,000. Time to median administration was faster for LHD in smaller counties and similar for LHD and private medical providers in larger counties. Children who always received routine childhood immunizations either within or outside of their county of residence often had the same practice for H1N1 vaccine, with 85% of children following these patterns. Children who did not follow these patterns were more likely to receive H1N1 influenza vaccine through LHD. CONCLUSIONS: Local health departments were able to rapidly administer large quantities of H1N1 influenza vaccine, and patterns of health care seeking relying on increased use of LHD needs to be further studied for future public health emergency planning.
Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional , Sistemas de Información en Salud , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/provisión & distribución , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , New York , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Práctica de Salud Pública , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To increase awareness of the financial barriers to childhood and adolescent vaccination, recent steps taken to mitigate these barriers, and remaining gaps following passage of Federal healthcare reform legislation. RECENT FINDINGS: Financial barriers to vaccination remain, even with the safety net of the Vaccines for Children Program. Newly recommended vaccines have substantially increased the cost to fully vaccinate a child up to age 18 years, and the combination of these cost burdens and inadequate reimbursement, in both the private and public sectors, has led some physicians to seriously consider stopping vaccination services. Up to 20% of privately insured children or adolescents have coverage that does not fully cover all costs of immunization, potentially leading to fragmented and inadequate preventive care. SUMMARY: Federal healthcare reform legislation, as currently constituted, may not fully address all financing gaps, and the extent to which financial barriers to immunization services remain will need to be evaluated as the legislation is implemented. Recent National Vaccine Advisory Committee recommendations need to be considered to address financial barriers to immunization.
Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Vacunación/economía , Adolescente , Servicios de Salud del Adolescente/economía , Niño , Servicios de Salud del Niño/economía , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcomes of efforts to prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) made over the last 2 decades in New York State (NYS), through review of data from multiple sources. METHODS: Using available surveillance, laboratory, and program monitoring data, the following were examined for NYS: (1) the rate of prenatal HIV testing, (2) HIV prevalence among childbearing women, (3) maternal prenatal and delivery care, (4) care of HIV-exposed infants, and (5) the rate of MTCT. Trends over time and comparisons among groups were assessed. RESULTS: In NYS, HIV prevalence in childbearing women has declined 70% since its peak in 1989. Rates of prenatal HIV testing have been more than 95% in recent years. Rates of MTCT have decreased significantly; since 2003, transmission in HIV-exposed births has ranged from 1.2% to 2.6% annually. On bivariate analysis, MTCT is more likely to occur with breastfeeding or absence of antiretroviral administration in the prenatal, labor/delivery, and newborn periods. CONCLUSIONS: Mother-to-child HIV transmission has declined dramatically in all groups in NYS. Universal newborn screening data have provided the foundation for identifying HIV-exposed births and for initiating follow-up to track all aspects of MTCT in NYS. Remaining challenges include universal prenatal care, prevention of acquisition of HIV infection during pregnancy, and adherence to antiretroviral therapy.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Diagnóstico Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Serodiagnóstico del SIDA , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamizaje Neonatal , New York , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/normas , Diagnóstico Prenatal/tendencias , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/tendencias , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus has been virtually eliminated in New York State (NYS) in a relatively short time. The dramatic reduction in MTCT was achieved through a comprehensive public health program that maximized the benefits of advances in both diagnosis and treatment of HIV infection. The multifaceted program encompassed interventions at multiple levels. It mobilized and engaged medical providers, and it changed clinical practice and the health care delivery system in NYS. Specific approaches were developed and modified over time by using data from multiple sources and in response to medical and scientific advances. This article describes factors associated with MTCT in NYS, the framework for program development, the evolution of NYS's public health program to prevent MTCT, remaining issues, and recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Política de Salud , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/métodos , Desarrollo de Programa , Adulto , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Atención Integral de Salud/normas , Consejo , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Programas Obligatorios , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Centros de Salud Materno-Infantil/provisión & distribución , New York , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
In 2014, New York State became the first jurisdiction to launch a statewide initiative to end AIDS by reducing the number of persons living with HIV for the first time since effective HIV treatment became available. The Ending the Epidemic (ETE) initiative encompasses (1) identifying and linking undiagnosed persons with HIV to care, (2) retaining persons with HIV in care, and (3) facilitating access to preexposure prophylaxis for persons at risk for acquiring HIV. We used a framework for public health program implementation to describe key characteristics of the ETE initiative, present progress toward 13 ETE target metrics, and identify areas in need of increased programming. We provide evidence suggesting that New York State is on track to end AIDS as an epidemic by the end of 2020. As of 2017, 76% of progress toward our primary ETE target had been achieved. Substantial progress on several additional metrics critical to decreasing HIV prevalence and to improving the health of persons living with HIV had also been achieved. Lessons learned included the following: (1) ETE-based programming should be tailored to each jurisdiction's unique political and social climate, HIV epidemiology, fiscal resources, and network of HIV service providers; (2) key stakeholders should be involved in developing ETE metrics and setting targets; (3) performance-based measurement and timely communication to key stakeholders in real time are essential; and (4) examining trends in HIV prevention and care metrics is important for developing realistic ETE timelines.
Asunto(s)
Epidemias/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/epidemiología , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/prevención & control , Comunicación , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , New York , Cooperación del Paciente , Política , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Prevalencia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Características de la Residencia , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COPD is the third leading cause of death in the United States, with 16 million Americans currently experiencing difficulty with breathing. Power outages could be life-threatening for those relying on electricity. However, significant gaps remain in understanding the potential impact of power outages on COPD exacerbations. RESEARCH QUESTION: The goal of this study was to determine how power outages affect COPD exacerbations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using distributed lag nonlinear models controlling for time-varying confounders, the hospitalization rate during a power outage was compared vs non-outage periods to determine the rate ratio (RR) for COPD and its subtypes at each of 0 to 6 lag days in New York State from 2001 to 2013. Stratified analyses were conducted according to sociodemographic characteristics, season, and clinical severity; changes were investigated in numerous critical medical indicators, including length of stay, hospital cost, the number of comorbidities, and therapeutic procedures between the two periods. RESULTS: The RR of COPD hospitalization following power outages ranged from 1.03 to 1.39 across lag days. The risk was strongest at lag0 and lag1 days and lasted significantly for 7 days. Associations were stronger for the subgroup with acute bronchitis (RR, 1.08-1.69) than for cases of acute exacerbation (RR, 1.03-1.40). Compared with non-outage periods, the outage period was observed to be $4.67 thousand greater in hospital cost and 1.38 greater in the number of comorbidities per case. The average cost (or number of comorbidities) was elevated in all groups stratified according to cost (or number of comorbidities). In contrast, changes in the average length of stay (-0.43 day) and the average number of therapeutic procedures (-0.09) were subtle. INTERPRETATION: Power outages were associated with a significantly elevated rate of COPD hospitalization, as well as greater costs and number of comorbidities. The average cost and number of comorbidities were elevated in all clinical severity groups.