Sampling of Thoracic Lymph Nodes and Lung Lesions: Trends in Procedural Utilization.

BACKGROUND: Advances in bronchoscopy have impacted the practice patterns in the sampling of thoracic lymph nodes and lung lesions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to study the trends in utilization of mediastinoscopy, transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA), and bronchoscopic transbronchial sampling. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of patient claims for sampling of thoracic lymph nodes and lung lesions in the Medicare population and a sample of the commercial population between 2016 and 2020. We used Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify mediastinoscopy, TTNA, and bronchoscopic transbronchial sampling. Post-procedural pneumothorax rates were assessed by procedure type including subset analyses for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2020, utilization of mediastinoscopy has decreased in both the Medicare and commercial populations (-47.3% and -65.4%, respectively), while linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) has increased only in the Medicare population (+28.2%). Percutaneous lung biopsy claims dropped by -17.0% in the Medicare and -41.22% in the commercial population. The use of bronchoscopic TBNA and forceps biopsy declined in both populations, but the reliance on a combination of guided technology (radial EBUS-guided and navigation) grew in the Medicare and commercial populations (+76.3% and +25%). Rates of post-procedural pneumothorax were significantly higher following percutaneous biopsy compared to bronchoscopic transbronchial biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Linear EBUS-guided sampling has surpassed mediastinoscopy as the technique for sampling thoracic lymph nodes. Transbronchial lung sampling is increasingly being performed with guidance technology. This trend is aligned with favorable rates of post-procedure pneumothorax for transbronchial biopsy.

Clinical and Economic Implications of Interventions in Pancreatic Fluid Collections: An Assessment From a National Claims Database.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and economic implications of percutaneous and endoscopic treatment approaches in patients with pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective claims analysis of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent inpatient endoscopic or percutaneous PFC drainage procedures (2016-2020). We performed longitudinal analysis of claims for all-cause mortality and rehospitalization during 180-day follow-up. Main outcome was mortality. Other outcomes were rehospitalization and direct costs. RESULTS: A total of 1311 patients underwent endoscopic (n = 727) or percutaneous (n = 584) drainage. Percutaneous as compared with endoscopic approach was associated with higher mortality (23.08% vs 16.7%, P = 0.004), rehospitalization (58.9% vs 53.3%, P = 0.04), and mean direct hospital costs ($37,107 [SD = $67,833] vs $27,800 [SD = $43,854], P = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, percutaneous drainage (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.86; P = 0.039), older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < 0.001), intensive care unit stay (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001), and multiple comorbidities (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.09; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with mortality. Percutaneous drainage (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.04-1.63; P = 0.027) and older age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with rehospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: As percutaneous drainage may be associated with higher mortality, rehospitalization, and costs, when requisite expertise is available, endoscopy should be preferred for treatment of PFC amenable to such an approach. Randomized trials are required to validate these findings.

The Magnitude of a Community's Health Needs and Nonprofit Hospitals' Progress in Meeting Those Needs: Are We Faced With a Paradox?

OBJECTIVES: Although most nonprofit hospitals are required to conduct periodic community health needs assessments (CHNAs), such assessments arguably are most critical for communities with substantial health needs. The objective of this study was to describe differences in progress in conducting CHNAs between hospitals located in communities with the greatest compared with the fewest health needs. METHODS: We used data on CHNA activity from the 2013 tax filings of 1331 US hospitals combined with data on community health needs from the County Health Rankings. We used bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine differences in hospitals' progress in implementing comprehensive CHNAs using 4 activities: (1) strategies to address identified needs, (2) participation in developing community-wide plans, (3) including CHNA into a hospital's operational plan, and (4) developing a budget to address identified needs. We compared progress in communities with the greatest and the fewest health needs using a comprehensive indicator comprising a community's socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, access to medical care, and physical environment. RESULTS: In 2013, nonprofit hospitals serving communities with the greatest health needs conducted an average of 2.5 of the 4 CHNA activities, whereas hospitals serving communities with the fewest health needs conducted an average of 2.7 activities. Multivariate analysis, however, showed a negative but not significant relationship between the magnitude of a community's health needs and a hospital's progress in implementing comprehensive CHNAs. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals serving communities with the greatest health needs face high demand for free and reduced-cost care, which may limit their ability to invest more of their community benefit dollars in initiatives aimed at improving the health of the community.