RESUMEN
With the recent advent of newer targeted therapies, including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and CAR T cells, treatment approaches to newly diagnosed as well as relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have changed. This chapter summarizes the newest treatment approaches in newly diagnosed T-cell and B-cell ALL, as well as the use of novel therapies for relapsed and refractory ALL.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Humanos , Inotuzumab Ozogamicina , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Standard therapy for relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is salvage therapy followed by autologous (auto) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, many patients have refractory disease and are unable to undergo autoHSCT, and a sizeable proportion of patients will relapse after autoHSCT. By analogy to diffuse large B cell lymphoma, these patients may be treated with allogeneic (allo) HSCT with curative intent, but at the risk of significant morbidity and mortality. Given the advent of effective immunotherapy approaches for rel/ref PMBCL, it is important to better understand the toxicity and efficacy of alloHSCT in these patients, to which these new approaches could be an alternative. Therefore, we retrospectively studied the outcomes of alloHSCT in a multicenter cohort of 28 patients with rel/ref PMBCL who underwent transplantation at 4 centers. Most patients (79%) were sensitive to pretransplantation therapy and 86% received reduced-intensity conditioning. The overall progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality and relapse in the cohort at 5 years were 34%, 45%, 32%, and 33%, respectively. Outcomes were significantly better in patients with pretransplantation responsive disease (2-year PFS and OS of 50% and 58%, respectively) compared with refractory patients (2-year PFS and OS of 0%). In our multicenter retrospective study, alloHSCT produced durable remissions in a proportion of patients with treatment-sensitive disease before transplantation (5-year PFS of 44%) and should be considered in the treatment of patients with rel/ref PMBCL.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Linfoma de Células B , Neoplasias del Mediastino , Adolescente , Adulto , Aloinjertos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células B/terapia , Masculino , Neoplasias del Mediastino/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Mediastino/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is incurable with conventional therapies. Limited retrospective data have shown durable remissions after haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) [allogeneic (allo) or autologous (auto)]. We conducted a multicentre retrospective study in BPDCN patients treated with allo-HCT and auto-HCT at 8 centres in the United States and Canada. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The population consisted of 45 consecutive patients who received an allo-HCT (n = 37) or an auto-HCT (n = 8) regardless of age, pre-transplant therapies, or remission status at transplantation. Allo-HCT recipients were younger (50 (14-74) vs. 67 (45-72) years, P = 0·01) and had 1-year and 3-year OS of 68% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 49-81%] and 58% (95% CI = 38-75%), respectively. Allo-HCT in first complete remission (CR1) yielded superior 3-year OS (versus not in CR1) [74% (95% CI = 48-89%) vs. 0, P < 0·0001]. Allo-HCT outcomes were not impacted by regimen intensity [3-year OS for myeloablative conditioning = 61% (95% CI = 28-83%) vs. reduced-intensity conditioning = 55% (95% CI = 28-76%)]. One-year OS for auto-HCT recipients was 11% (95% CI = 8-50%). These results demonstrate efficacy of allo-HCT in BPDCN, especially in patients in CR1. Pertaining to auto-HCT, our results suggest lack of efficacy against BPDCN, but this observation is limited by the small sample size. Larger prospective studies are needed to better define the role of HCT in BPDCN.
Asunto(s)
Células Dendríticas/patología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia de Injerto , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Trasplante Autólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Homólogo/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Patients with cancer are at increased risk of death from COVID-19 and have reduced immune responses to SARS-CoV2 vaccines, necessitating regular boosters. We performed comprehensive chart reviews, surveys of patients attitudes, serology for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and T-cell receptor (TCR) ß sequencing for cellular responses on a cohort of 982 cancer patients receiving active cancer therapy accrued between November-3-2020 and Mar-31-2023. We found that 92·3% of patients received the primer vaccine, 70·8% received one monovalent booster, but only 30·1% received a bivalent booster. Booster uptake was lower under age 50, and among African American or Hispanic patients. Nearly all patients seroconverted after 2+ booster vaccinations (>99%) and improved cellular responses, demonstrating that repeated boosters could overcome poor response to vaccination. Receipt of booster vaccinations was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR=0·61, P=0·024). Booster uptake in high-risk cancer patients remains low and strategies to encourage booster uptake are needed. Highlights: COVID-19 booster vaccinations increase antibody levels and maintain T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients receiving various anti-cancer therapiesBooster vaccinations reduced all-cause mortality in patientsA significant proportion of patients remain unboosted and strategies are needed to encourage patients to be up-to-date with vaccinations.
RESUMEN
Longitudinal studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine-induced immune responses in patients with cancer are needed to optimize clinical care. In a prospective cohort study of 366 (291 vaccinated) patients, we measured antibody levels [anti-spike (IgG-(S-RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid immunoglobulin] at three time points. Antibody level trajectories and frequency of breakthrough infections were evaluated by tumor type and timing of treatment relative to vaccination. IgG-(S-RBD) at peak response (median = 42 days after dose 2) was higher (P = 0.002) and remained higher after 4 to 6 months (P = 0.003) in patients receiving mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2. Patients with solid tumors attained higher peak levels (P = 0.001) and sustained levels after 4 to 6 months (P < 0.001) compared with those with hematologic malignancies. B-cell targeted treatment reduced peak (P = 0.001) and sustained antibody responses (P = 0.003). Solid tumor patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors before vaccination had lower sustained antibody levels than those who received treatment after vaccination (P = 0.043). Two (0.69%) vaccinated and one (1.9%) unvaccinated patient had severe COVID-19 illness during follow-up. Our study shows variation in sustained antibody responses across cancer populations receiving various therapeutic modalities, with important implications for vaccine booster timing and patient selection. SIGNIFICANCE: Long-term studies of immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with cancer are needed to inform evidence-based guidelines for booster vaccinations and to tailor sequence and timing of vaccinations to elicit improved humoral responses.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Inmunidad Humoral , Neoplasias/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Inmunoglobulina G , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Vacunación/métodosRESUMEN
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be curative for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Based on studies suggesting that anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can sensitize patients to subsequent chemotherapy, we hypothesized that anti-PD-1 therapy before ASCT would result in acceptable outcomes among high-risk patients who progressed on or responded insufficiently to ≥1 salvage regimen, including chemorefractory patients who are traditionally considered poor ASCT candidates. We retrospectively identified 78 HL patients who underwent ASCT after receiving an anti-PD-1 mAb (alone or in combination) as third-line or later therapy across 22 centers. Chemorefractory disease was common, including 42 patients (54%) refractory to ≥2 consecutive systemic therapies immediately before anti-PD-1 treatment. Fifty-eight (74%) patients underwent ASCT after anti-PD-1 treatment, while 20 patients (26%) received additional therapy after PD-1 blockade and before ASCT. Patients received a median of 4 systemic therapies (range, 3-7) before ASCT, and 31 patients (41%) had a positive pre-ASCT positron emission tomography (PET) result. After a median post-ASCT follow-up of 19.6 months, the 18-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 81% (95% CI, 69-89) and 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87-99), respectively. Favorable outcomes were observed for patients who were refractory to 2 consecutive therapies immediately before PD-1 blockade (18-month PFS, 78%), had a positive pre-ASCT PET (18-month PFS, 75%), or received ≥4 systemic therapies before ASCT (18-month PFS, 73%), while PD-1 nonresponders had inferior outcomes (18-month PFS, 51%). In this high-risk cohort, ASCT after anti-PD-1 therapy was associated with excellent outcomes, even among heavily pretreated, previously chemorefractory patients.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes in high risk renal transplant recipients over 60 years of age compared with those younger than 60 years of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed outcomes in 131 consecutive renal transplant recipients at our institution between November 2001 and December 2007. Primary outcomes included incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection, graft survival, patient survival, and incidence of infections and neoplasms. RESULTS: Older recipients (Over 60 group, n = 45) received more organs from extended criteria donors (ECD) or donation after cardiac death donors (DCD) compared with younger recipients (Under 60 group, n = 86), 42% versus 17% respectively, P = 0.001. Multivariate analyses revealed that African American ethnicity and DCD donation had the greatest impact on the incidence of DGF in both groups; P < 0.05. Patient survival and graft survival beyond 1 y were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that long-term transplant outcomes in older, high risk renal transplant recipients are similar to those of younger, high risk recipients. Older recipients' age and high-risk characteristics, such as African American ethnicity and increased sensitization, should not be a contraindication to renal transplantation in the elderly.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Población Negra , Cadáver , Creatinina/sangre , Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto , Etnicidad , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Infecciones/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Selección de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis, assessment of treatment response, and monitoring for relapse is a new and developing field in lymphoma. This review aims to summarize many of the most recent advances in ctDNA applications. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have demonstrated the use of ctDNA assessment across many lymphoma subtypes including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and T-cell lymphoma. In addition, many novel applications of ctDNA assessment have been described such as the development of new prognostic models, investigation of clonal evolution and heterogeneity, early assessment of treatment response, and prediction of response to targeted therapy as a form of personalized medicine. The use of ctDNA has been shown to be feasible across many lymphoma subtypes and has shown significant promise for several new applications. Additional studies will be needed to validate these findings prior to routine use in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
ADN Tumoral Circulante/sangre , Linfoma , Modelos Biológicos , Animales , Humanos , Linfoma/sangre , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/terapia , PronósticoRESUMEN
Behavioral flexibility or 'set-shifting' refers to the ability to modify ongoing behavior in response to changing goals or environmental contingencies. Impaired behavioral flexibility is associated with disorders such as schizophrenia and addiction. Hypofunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors has been implicated in these impairments. Metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors closely interact with NMDA receptors and may provide a feasible pharmacological target for indirect manipulation of NMDA receptor function in disease states. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of NMDA and mGlu5 receptors on set-shifting ability. We developed a computer-controlled, operant-based set-shifting task that requires rats to learn sequential discrimination rules based on two distinct perceptual dimensions. Using this task, we found that administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK801, both systemically and intracortically, significantly impaired task performance, whereas stimulation or inhibition of mGlu5 receptors did not impair task performance. However, when administered after MK801, potentiation of mGlu5 receptor function reduced the performance impairments observed with MK801 alone. These results suggest an interaction between NMDA and mGlu5 receptors in cognitive flexibility and may provide a novel therapeutic approach for treating disorders associated with aberrant NMDA function.