HES6 knockdown in human hematopoietic precursor cells reduces their in vivo engraftment potential and their capacity to differentiate into erythroid cells, B cells, T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells.

Hematopoiesis is driven by molecular mechanisms that induce differentiation and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells and their progeny. This involves the activity of various transcription factors, such as members of the Hairy/Enhancer of Split (HES) family, and important roles for both HES1 and HES4 have been shown in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Here, we investigated the role of HES6 in human hematopoiesis using in vitro and in vivo models. Using bulk and scRNA-seq data, we show that HES6 is expressed during erythroid/megakaryocyte and pDC development, as well as in multipotent precursors and at specific stages of T- and B-cell development following preBCR and preTCR signalling, respectively. Consistently, knockdown of HES6 in cord blood-derived hematopoietic precursors in well-defined in vitro differentiation assays resulted in reduced differentiation of human hematopoietic precursors towards megakaryocytes, erythrocytes, pDCs, Band T-cells. In addition, HES6 knockdown HSPCs displayed reduced colony forming unit capacity in vitro and impaired potential to reconstitute hematopoiesis in vivo in a competitive transplantation assay. We demonstrate that loss of HES6 expression impacts cell cycle progression during erythroid differentiation and provide evidence for potential downstream target genes that impact these perturbations. Thus, our study uncovers new insights for a role of HES6 in human hematopoiesis.

Evaluation of the applicability of internal controls on self-collected samples for high-risk human papillomavirus is needed.

BACKGROUND: Self-collection of cervical samples to detect high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) is a trending topic in primary cervical cancer screening. This study evaluates the applicability of a self-sampling device to routine molecular procedures for hr-HPV detection. METHODS: In a primary health care facility in Kinshasa, Congo, 187 self-collected samples (Evalyn Brush) were gathered and sent to Ghent University Hospital (UZ Ghent) and Algemeen Medisch Labo (AML) in Belgium where routine tests for hr-HPV were applied (Abbott RealTime hr-HPV and qPCR (E6/E7), respectively). Sample type effect was evaluated by comparing the internal control (IC) between the self-collected samples and routine, clinician-taken samples randomly selected from the UZ Ghent archive. RESULTS: In UZ Ghent an error was encountered in 9.1% (17/187) of self-collected samples due to a lack of IC signal. The hr-HPV prevalence in the remaining 170 samples was 18,8%. Comparing IC results between the self-collected and clinician-collected groups, a significant difference (p < 0,001) was found, with higher IC signals in the clinician-collected group. In AML, an error was encountered in 17.6% (33/187) of samples, including 16/17 of the UZ Ghent. The remaining sample with IC error gave a negative result in AML. Among the 154 samples without IC error at AML, a correlation of 90% was seen between both laboratories with a 77% negativity rate. CONCLUSION: Testing the self-collected specimens by 2 routine hr-HPV tests gave a high IC error rate (9.1-17.6%). A possible solution would be to differentiate cut-offs for IC values depending on sample type, as currently used cut-offs are set for clinician-taken samples.