Enhanced recovery after surgery recommendations for renal transplantation: guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are now widely practiced in major surgery, improving postsurgical outcomes. Uptake of these programmes have been slow in kidney transplantation due to challenges in evaluating their safety and efficacy in this high-risk cohort. To date, there are no unified guidance and protocols specific to ERAS in kidney transplantation surgery. This paper aims to summarise current evidence in the literature and develop ERAS protocol recommendations for kidney transplantation recipients. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Medline databases were screened for studies relevant to ERAS protocols in kidney transplantation, up to August 2021. A secondary search was repeated for each ERAS recommendation to explore the specific evidence base available for each section of the protocol. Randomised controlled trials, case-control and cohort studies were included. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was used to evaluate the quality of evidence available and recommendations. RESULTS: We identified six eligible studies with a total of 1225 participants. All studies found a reduction in length of hospital stay without affecting readmission rates. The evidence behind specific pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative interventions included in current ERAS protocols are reviewed and discussed. CONCLUSION: Compared to other surgical specialties, the evidence base for ERAS in kidney transplantation remains lacking, with further room for research and development. However, significant improvements to patient outcomes are already possible with application of the currently available evidence. This has shown that ERAS in kidney transplantation surgery is safe and feasible, with improved postoperative outcomes.

Kidney and combined kidney and pancreas transplantation may be under-utilized in cystic fibrosis.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a multisystem disorder and represents the most common inherited condition leading to death in Western countries. Previous reports of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in CF focus on cases post lung, or other solid organ, transplantation but CKD in CF patients pre transplantation is increasingly recognized as a challenging complication of CF. CKD can evolve as a sequel to acute kidney injury for example after prolonged treatment with aminoglycoside antibiotics during episodes of infection. Nephrolithiasis, diabetic nephropathy and a variety of glomerular lesions, such as amyloidosis and Immunoglobulin A nephropathy are also seen. Muscle depletion is common in CF, hence creatinine-based estimates of kidney function may underestimate the degree of renal impairment and lead to delayed diagnosis and management. Improved treatment options for CF patients have resulted in a sustained increase in life expectancy with increasing numbers of CF patients with CKD approaching end-stage renal failure prior to consideration of lung transplantation. We believe that kidney or combined kidney-pancreas transplantation are under-utilized in this population. We provide a brief primer on the landscape of CF and CKD and discuss transplant options. Suitable patients with CF and advanced CKD should be formally assessed for kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Radiological initial treatment of vascular catastrophes in pancreas transplantation: Review of current literature.

BACKGROUND: Arterio-enteric fistula (AEF) is a rare but potentially devastating complication of solid organ pancreatic transplantation. Traditional management has been to remove the pancreas-duodenum allograft and control the vascular defect. Interventional radiological (IR) techniques present a new method of managing AEF related haemorrhage without re-operation and the potential to preserve graft function. This paper examines the available literature to assess efficacy and safety of this novel approach. METHODS: Aggregate results tables were constructed from 28 cases identified in the English language literature where IR was used in the management of AEF following pancreas transplantation. Outcomes recorded were death, re-bleeding, surgical intervention required and post intervention graft function. These were analysed with respect to technical factors and graft function at time of presentation. RESULTS: 28 cases of AEF managed by IR methods were identified. Mortality was high at 17.9%. 78.6% of all AEFs were present in failed pancreas allografts. Median time from transplant to bleeding event was 29 months. There was a trend of bleeding event occurring within 12 months of allograft failure or rejection. Of the AEFs present in functioning grafts, graft salvage rate was 33% from available data. Coil embolization or use of haemostatic compressed sponge as primary intervention was associated with a higher rate of re-bleeding and death versus arterial stenting. Arterial stenting resulted in a higher rate of distal ischaemia requiring surgical re-vascularisation. All deaths occurred in patients who did not have a transplant pancreatectomy as part of their definitive treatment. CONCLUSION: IR can be an effective way to manage bleeding in the context of AEF associated with pancreas transplantation. If patient condition allows, it should be the first-choice intervention to manage AEF associated bleeding. Use of arterial stenting is more effective in controlling and preventing further bleeding. In a non-functioning graft, transplant pancreatectomy should be strongly considered, possibly in conjunction with or following arterial stenting.

Comparison of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Analysis with 5-Year Outcome.

BACKGROUND It is routine to implant the pancreas on the right and the renal graft on the left iliac fossa during a simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant (cSPK). Ipsilateral placement of both organs on the same side raises concerns that the pancreas graft might compromise the distally placed kidney. However, ipsilateral SPK (iSPK) can be faster than the conventional contralateral graft placement and allows for preservation of the other side for future transplants. MATERIAL AND METHODS In a single unit, 67 SPK transplantations (cSPK n=49, iSPK n=18) were performed from 2008 to 2011. The decision for graft placement was made during the procedure. Donor and recipient demographics, surgical complications, reoperations, surgical time, and patient and graft survival with 5-year follow-up were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Duration of operation was shorter in the iSPK group. Recipient and donor demographics were comparable, apart from more females receiving ipsilateral graft placement. The broader female pelvis was probably the determining factor contributing to this outcome. The iSPK group included marginally younger recipients. The ipsilateral group also demonstrated a trend to improved survival of patient, pancreas, and kidney graft, at 1- and 5-year follow-up. There was no difference in complication rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in overall outcomes. iSPK is a safe procedure, which proves similar patient and graft survival as with cSPK. Both procedures have comparable surgical complication rates. iSPK is a safe and quicker procedure that allows for preservation of the contralateral side for potential subsequent transplants.

Occult donor malignancy in pancreas transplantation.

Tumor of the pancreas allograft is extremely rare. We report a case of an occult donor malignant undifferentiated tumor arising in a pancreas allograft. A 42-year-old female with Type 1 diabetes received a macroscopically normal pancreas allograft. The donor was a 22-year-old male who died of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. She underwent transplant pancreatectomy, the histology of the pancreas allograft demonstrated a tumor measuring 5 mm in diameter, and a diagnosis of malignant undifferentiated tumor was made. In a different transplant center, the recipient of the left kidney transplant from the same donor had a nephrectomy, and the recipient of the liver transplant died of metastatic disease. Microscopic examination of the liver and kidney allografts subsequently revealed histological features identical to the pancreas tumor. Tumor transmission in transplantation may occur from an organ that contains metastatic cells or, less commonly, from the transmission of an unrecognized or occult primary tumor. A report from the United Network for Organs Sharing transplant data 1997-2002 is illustrated and discussed. This case illustrates the difficulties associated with identifying donors with occult primary tumor or metastases.

Successful renal transplantation during pregnancy.

Little is known about the implications of performing a renal transplant on a patient who is already pregnant. This case study reports a successful outcome of pregnancy, diagnosed coincidentally following renal transplantation at 13 weeks gestation. The recipient was a 23-year-old woman with chronic kidney disease who received a live-related renal transplant from her father. Pregnancy was discovered at routine ultrasound scanning of the renal allograft at 5 days posttransplant and estimated at 13 weeks gestation. She received ciclosporin monotherapy as immunosuppression throughout the pregnancy, and was given valacyclovir as prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Renal function remained stable throughout the pregnancy, which progressed normally, resulting in the vaginal delivery of a healthy, liveborn male infant at 37 weeks gestation. This case study demonstrates that transplantation during pregnancy can have a successful outcome.