LAD2 mast cell activation test associates with the reaction severity and diagnoses BAT nonresponders in Hymenoptera venom allergy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The usefulness of the mast cell activation test (MAT) in diagnosing patients with uninterpretable basophil activation test (BAT) caused by nonresponding basophils has not yet been addressed. It should be further evaluated if the results of MAT are associated with the severity of the allergic reaction. METHODS: We recruited 39 Hymenoptera venom allergic (HVA) patients, 22 non-sensitized controls, and 37 BAT nonresponding HVA patients. Specific IgE levels for honey bee venom (HBV), yellow jacket venom (YJV) and total IgEs were quantified using the Immulite system. BAT and MAT with LAD2 cells in response to HBV and YJV were performed. RESULTS: We first optimized the susceptibility of LAD2 cells to IgE-mediated degranulation in HVA and showed that prestimulation with IL-33 and IL-6 significantly increased the LAD2 cells´ responsiveness to allergen stimulation (P<0.01). LAD2 MAT results correlated with BAT results, and patients with severe sting reactions (Mueller grades IV or III) had a median 2-fold higher LAD2 MAT than the patients with nonsevere sting reactions (Mueller grades II, I or LLR) (P<0.05). Further, LAD2 MAT provided conclusive results in 54.1% (20 of 37) of HVA patients with nonresponding basophils in the BAT. CONCLUSION: The LAD2 MAT represents a new diagnostic tool for HVA patients with nonresponding basophils. Further, LAD2 MAT can identify patients at risk of severe sting reactions and thus can help guide recommendations for venom immunotherapy and improve the management of patients with HVA.

Immunological and clinical factors associated with adverse systemic reactions during the build-up phase of honeybee venom immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Adverse systemic reactions (SRs) are more common in honeybee venom immunotherapy (VIT) than in wasp VIT. Factors that might be associated with SRs during the honeybee VIT are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for SRs during the build-up phase of honeybee venom immunotherapy. METHODS: We included 93 patients who underwent ultra-rush honeybee VIT. The adverse SRs and their severity was compared to various immunological (sIgE, tIgE, basophil CD63 response, baseline tryptase, and skin tests), patient-specific (age, sex, cardiovascular conditions and medications, and other allergic diseases), and sting-specific factors (anaphylaxis severity, time interval to onset of symptoms, and absence of cutaneous symptoms). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (24.7%) experienced mild SRs and 13 patients (14%) severe SRs. In five patients with severe SRs, the build-up was stopped. High basophil allergen sensitivity, evaluated as dose-response curve metrics of EC15, EC50, CD-sens, AUC, or the response to submaximal 0.01 µg/mL of venom concentration, was the most significant risk factor and only independent predictor of severe SRs and/or build-up stop. Time interval of <5 min after sting to onset of symptoms and lower specific IgEs to rApi m1 was also associated with severe SRs. There was no difference in other immunological, patient-specific, or sting-specific factors, including the baseline tryptase. None of the studied factors was associated with mild SRs. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: High basophil allergen CD63 sensitivity phenotype was a major indicator of severe adverse SRs during the build-up phase of honeybee VIT. Possibly role was also showed for short latency to filed sting reaction and low sIgE to rApi m1. Before honeybee VIT, measurement of basophil allergen sensitivity should be used to identify patients with a high risk for severe side-effects.

Basophil response and the induction of a tolerance in venom immunotherapy: a long-term sting challenge study.

BACKGROUND: There is no in vitro test to predict the induction of long-term tolerance in patients treated with venom immunotherapy (VIT). The aim of this study was to investigate whether immunotherapy-induced changes in basophil responsiveness reflect a state of protection and the induction of a tolerance. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with allergic reaction after Hymenoptera sting (11 wasp and 12 honeybee) were treated with VIT. In all patients, a CD63 basophil activation test was performed before the beginning of immunotherapy, after 1 year and after completing 4-6.5 years of immunotherapy (approximately 1 year after stopping). The tolerance was then evaluated by a sting challenge test. The basophil activation test was repeated 3-6 months after the challenge. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects showed a negative sting challenge, and one subject, a positive sting challenge. Allergen-specific basophil response remained unchanged after 1 year of immunotherapy. However, after immunotherapy, a significant and approximately fourfold decrease was demonstrated in all tolerant subjects mainly in response to submaximal 0.1 µg/ml allergen concentration. This depression was sustained and did not change with the sting challenge test. In a nontolerant patient with a positive sting challenge, basophil response did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the depression of allergen-specific basophil response seems to be associated with the induction of a tolerance after completing a course of VIT.

Short-term venom immunotherapy induces desensitization of FcεRI-mediated basophil response.

BACKGROUND: The precise immunological mechanisms for the early clinical protection of venom immunotherapy (VIT) have not yet been explained. Our aim was to evaluate whether high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI) and the related basophil function have a role in the induction of short-term VIT protection. METHODS: We included 60 adults and 48 children. Basophil threshold sensitivity (CD-sens) to anti-FcεRI stimulation, and FcεRI gene and cell-surface expression were assessed at the beginning and just before the first maintenance dose (MD) of 100 µg of ultra-rush VIT (day 5) and at the beginning, during buildup, and just before the first MD of 70 µg and of 100 µg of semi-rush VIT (weeks 1-2 and 5). RESULTS: We demonstrated a significant reduction in CD-sens to anti-FcεRI stimulation before the first MD in both ultra-rush and semi-rush VIT in all included subjects. FcεRI gene and/or cell-surface expression was decreased in 34-100% of subjects, with different dynamics between VIT protocols. CONCLUSION: We found a marked desensitization of FcεRI-activated basophils after short-term VIT. This suppression, which could be highly relevant for the development of early protective mechanisms, might be also related to the changes at the level of FcεRI expression.

Basophil responsiveness in patients with insect sting allergies and negative venom-specific immunoglobulin E and skin prick test results.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not adequately address the question of how best to manage patients with a convincing history of insect allergy, but negative venom-specific IgE and skin test results. METHODS: Forty-seven patients out of a total of 1219 (4%), with a positive history of sting allergy, were recruited over a period of 4.5 years. All recruited patients had a convincing history of a severe or a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction of Mueller grade II-IV (median grade III) after Hymenoptera sting, but negative venom-specific IgE and skin prick test results. Diagnostic work-up was prospectively followed by the CD63 basophil activation test and by intradermal skin testing. A control group of 25 subjects was also assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-five out of 47 (75%) patients demonstrated a positive basophil CD63 response after stimulation with bee and/or wasp venom. Intradermal venom skin tests were performed for 37 patients, 17 (46%) of whom showed positive results. Out of 20 patients who demonstrated negative intradermal test results, 12 patients showed a positive CD63 response (60%). In contrast, out of 9 patients who showed a negative CD63 response, only one was detected by intradermal testing (11%). In the control group, only two out of 25 (4%) subjects displayed a positive basophil response and/or intradermal test. CONCLUSION: Here we show that, in complex cases with inconclusive diagnostic results, the CD63 activation test could be particularly useful and more sensitive than intradermal skin testing.