Enteral administration of crushed rilpivirine in a patient with HIV: A case report.

Antiretroviral therapy administration is challenging in patients with HIV requiring enteral nutrition. There are limited pharmacokinetic data available regarding the absorption of crushed rilpivirine (RPV) and its impact on drug bioavailability, plasma concentrations and, consequently, the efficacy of treatment. We present the case of a 60-year-old woman with HIV diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma who needed enteral administration of antiretroviral therapy following the insertion of a gastrotomy tube in September 2018. Initially, the patient was treated with a daily dose of RPV 25 mg, dolutegravir 50 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg. The treatment was later intensified with darunavir boosted with ritonavir. RPV and dolutegravir were crushed, dissolved in water and administered via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. Therapeutic drug and viral load monitoring determined the adequacy of enteral antiretroviral dosing. RPV plasma concentrations remained within the expected therapeutic range of 43-117 ng/mL, with only 1 below the currently used 50 ng/mL efficacy threshold. After the treatment intensification with darunavir boosted with ritonavir, the patient achieved an undetectable viral load. While we observed satisfactory RPV plasma concentrations, it is essential to maintain strict monitoring of administration method, plasma concentrations and virological responses when initiating treatment with crushed RPV. Hence, additional pharmacokinetic data are necessary to ensure the effective enteral administration of RPV and to establish the best antiretroviral dosing regimens.

Ledipasvir and tenofovir drug interaction in human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus coinfected patients: Impact on tenofovir trough concentrations and renal safety.

We evaluate the impact of ledipasvir on both tenofovir plasma trough concentration and estimated glomerular renal function in human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus coinfected patients receiving a tenofovir-based antiretroviral regimen and treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir. Twenty-six patients [81% male, median age: 51 years; hepatitis C virus genotype 1(75%)/4(15%)] were included. Tenofovir trough concentration (interquartile range) increased from 78 ng ml-1 (53-110) at baseline to 141 ng ml-1 (72-176) at 1 month (P = 0.003). No significant difference on estimated glomerular renal function using both Cockroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulae, respectively, [median (interquartile range)] was observed between baseline [101.3 ml min-1 (91.1-114.1); 95.6 ml min-1 (86.5-111.2)], 1 month [102.4 ml min-1 (89.8-112.9), P = 0.26; 92.5 ml min-1 (88.1-114.3), P = 0.27], end-of-treatment [96.5 ml min-1 (82.4-115.4), P = 0.39; 95.4 ml min-1 (84.2-105.4), P = 0.16] and 12 weeks after the end of treatment [100.5 ml min-1 (83.3-111.9), P = 0.24; 93.4 ml min-1 (82.2-103.5), P = 0.16]. Three patients progressed from chronic kidney disease stage 1 to stage 2 at 12 weeks post-treatment. A significant increase in tenofovir exposure through P-glycoprotein inhibition by ledipasvir was confirmed without significant impact on glomerular renal function in our population with normal renal function or mild renal impairment.