RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In the United States, an estimated $2.8 billion annually is spent on vascular access and its complications. Endovascular arteriovenous fistula (endoAVF) creation is a novel, minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical AV fistula (sAVF) creation in ≤60% of patients. Although cost effective in single-payer systems, the clinical and financial impact of endoAVF in the United States remains uncertain. METHODS: We constructed a decision tree followed by a probabilistic cohort state-transition model to study the cost effectiveness of endoAVF vs sAVF creation. We conducted a systematic review to obtain input parameters including technical success, maturation, patency, and utility values. We derived costs from the Medicare 2022 fee schedule and from the literature. We used a 5-year time horizon, an annual discount rate of 3% for costs and utilities (measured in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), and the common willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000. One-way and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed varying technical success, patency, reintervention, cost, and utility parameters. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, endoAVF ($30,129 average per-person costs, 2.19 QALYs gained, 65% patent at 5 years) was not cost effective compared with sAVF ($12.987 average per-person costs, 2.11 QALYs gained, 66% patent at 5 years), generating an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $227,504 per QALY gained. In one-way sensitivity analyses, endoAVF becomes cost effective when the initial cost of sAVF creation exceeds endoAVF by ≥$600 (eg, if endoAVF creation costs ≤$3000 relative to the base-case sAVF cost of $3600), the additional QALYs gained from endoAVF exceeds 0.12 QALYs/year (eg, 0.81 QALYs gained/year from endoAVF compared with base-case sAVF 0.69 QALYs/year), the endoAVF maturation rate is >90% (base case 78%), or the sAVF maturation rate is <65% (base case 78%). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that sAVF remained the optimal strategy in 71% of iterations. CONCLUSIONS: EndoAVF is not cost effective compared with sAVF when modeling 5-year outcomes. The main driver of sAVF remaining cost effective is the four times higher up-front cost for endoAVF creation, as well as a relatively low additional increase in quality of life for endoAVF. It will be important to establish how the endoAVF learning curve contributes to upfront costs and, given the annual cost attributed to vascular access nationally, a randomized controlled trial is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Calidad de Vida , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Medicare , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heart disease and chronic kidney disease are often comorbid conditions owing to shared risk factors, including diabetes and hypertension. However, the effect of congestive heart failure (CHF) on arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and AV graft (AVG) patency rates is poorly understood. We hypothesize preexisting HF may diminish blood flow to the developing AVF and worsen patency. METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective review of 412 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent hemodialysis access creation from 2015 to 2021. Patients were stratified based on presence of preexisting CHF, defined as clinical symptoms plus evidence of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (<50%) or diastolic dysfunction on preoperative echocardiography. Baseline demographics, preoperative measures of cardiac function, and dialysis access-related surgical history were collected. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses were performed for primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency using standard definitions for patency from the literature. We assessed differences in patency for patients with CHF vs patients without CHF, patients with a reduced vs a normal EF, and AVG vs AVF in patients with CHF. RESULTS: We included 204 patients (50%) with preexisting CHF with confirmatory echocardiography. Patients with CHF were more likely to be male and have comorbidities including, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and a history of cerebrovascular accident. The groups were not significantly different in terms of prior fistula history (P = .99), body mass index (P = .74), or type of hemodialysis access created (P = .54). There was no statistically significant difference in primary patency, primary-assisted patency, or secondary patency over time in the CHF vs non-CHF group (log-rank P > .05 for all three patency measures). When stratified by preoperative left ventricular EF, patients with an EF of <50% had lower primary (38% vs 51% at 1 year), primary-assisted (76% vs 82% at 1 year), and secondary patency (86% vs 93% at 1 year) rates than those with a normal EF. Difference reached significance for secondary patency only (log-rank P = .029). AVG patency was compared against AVF patency within the CHF subgroup, with significantly lower primary-assisted (39% vs 87% at 1 year) and secondary (62% vs 95%) patency rates for AVG (P < .0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In this 7-year experience of hemodialysis access creation, reduced EF is associated with lower secondary patency. Preoperative CHF (including HF with reduced EF and HF with preserved EF together) is not associated with significant differences in overall hemodialysis access patency rates over time, but patients with CHF who receive AVG have markedly worse patency than those who receive AVF. For patients with end-stage renal disease and CHF, the risks and benefits must be carefully weighed, particularly for those with low EF or lack of a suitable vein for fistula creation.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Diabetes Mellitus , Fístula , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hipertensión , Fallo Renal Crónico , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Volumen Sistólico , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/terapia , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Fístula/complicaciones , Hipertensión/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Well-developed leadership skills have been associated with a better understanding of health care context, increased team performance, and improved patient outcomes. Surgeons, in particular, stand to benefit from leadership development. Although studies have focused on investigating knowledge gaps and needs of surgeons in leadership roles, there is a noticeable gap in the literature concerning leadership in vascular surgery. The goal of this study was to characterize current leadership attributes of vascular surgeons and understand demographic influences on leadership patterns. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was a descriptive analysis of vascular surgeons and their observers who took the Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) from 2020 to 2023. The LPI is a 30-question inventory that measures the frequency of specific leadership behaviors across five practices of leadership. RESULTS: A total of 110 vascular surgeons completed the LPI. The majority of participants were White (56%) and identified as male (60%). Vascular surgeons most frequently observed the "enabling others to act" leadership practice style (8.90 ± 0.74) by all evaluators. Vascular surgeons were most frequently above the 70th percentile in the "challenge the process" leadership practice style (49%) compared with the average of other leaders worldwide. Observers rated vascular surgeons as displaying significantly more frequent leadership behaviors than vascular surgeons rated themselves in every leadership practice style (P < .01). The only demographic variable associated with a significantly increased occurrence of achieving 70th percentile across all five leadership practice styles was the male gender: a multivariable model adjusting for objective experience showed that men were at least 3.5 times more likely to be rated above the 70th percentile than women. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons under-report the frequency at which they practice leadership skills across all five leadership practice styles and should recognize their strengths of enabling others to act and challenging the process. Men are recognized as exhibiting all five leadership practices more frequently than women, regardless of current position or experience level. This observation may reflect the limited leadership positions available for women, thereby restricting their opportunities to demonstrate leadership practices as frequently or recognizably as their male counterparts.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery injuries (PAIs) may have amputation rates as high as 20%. This study focuses on identifying risk factors associated with major amputations following PAIs in a large single-center cohort. Additionally, we assess the impact of repairing or ligating concomitant popliteal vein injuries. METHODS: A retrospective chart review encompassing 2011 to 2023 was conducted at a large urban level 1 trauma center. Patients with PAIs were included. Demographics and clinical data were analyzed, and univariate and multivariate evaluations identified significant risk factors for amputation. In patients with concomitant popliteal vein injuries, we compared outcomes between those who underwent popliteal vein repair and ligation. RESULTS: One hundred eighty eight patients with PAIs were identified; 10 underwent index amputation and were excluded. Univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis revealed that obesity (P = 0.0132) and neurologic deficits on arrival (P = 0.0096) were associated with amputation. In the subgroup with popliteal vein injuries (N = 93), there was no significant difference in amputation rates between those who had vein repair (P = 0.21) and those who underwent ligation (P = 0.84) on logistic regression analysis. Likewise, popliteal vein ligation did not impact duration of fasciotomy closure (P = 0.20) or skin graft area (P = 0.48) based on linear regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that major amputations following PAIs are more likely in obese patients with neurologic deficits. It also suggests that venous ligation in cases of concomitant popliteal vein injuries does not significantly impact early limb salvage rate. Further research is needed to determine the optimal approach for managing concomitant popliteal vein injuries.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Thoracic endovascular aortic surgery (TEVAR) is the modern standard of treatment for patients with Type B aortic dissection, however it is unclear how the initial length of treated aorta affects long-term outcomes. This study aims to elucidate risk factors for secondary intervention after TEVAR for aortic dissection, focusing on length of aortic treatment at index operation. METHODS: A retrospective multihospital chart review was completed for patients treated between 2011 and 2022 who underwent TEVAR for aortic dissection with at least 1 year of post-TEVAR imaging and follow-up. Patient demographics and characteristics were analyzed. In this study, aortic zones treated only included those managed with a covered stent graft. The primary outcome measure was any need for secondary intervention. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were identified. Demographics included a mean age of 57 years, with 31.8% of the patients being female. Forty-three patients (28.5%) underwent secondary intervention after TEVAR, with a mean follow-up of 1.6 years. The most common indication for secondary intervention was aneurysmal degeneration of the residual false lumen (76%). There was a significant difference in the number of aortic zones treated in patients who did and did not require secondary intervention (2.3 ± 1 vs. 2.7 ± 1, P = 0.04). Additionally, patients with 3 or more aortic zones of treatment had a significant difference in the need for reintervention (32% secondary intervention versus 52% no secondary intervention, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: At least 3 zones of aortic treatment at index TEVAR is associated with a decreased need for overall reintervention. Modern treatment of acute and subacute type B dissection should stress an aggressive initial repair, balanced by the potential increased risk of spinal cord ischemia.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Female sex has been associated with decreased mortality after blunt trauma, but whether sex influences the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for traumatic blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database, the Vascular Quality Initiative registry was queried from 2013 to 2020 for patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI. Univariate Student's t-tests and χ2 tests were performed, followed by multivariate logistic regression for variables associated with inpatient mortality. RESULTS: Of 806 eligible patients, 211 (26.2%) were female. Female patients were older (47.9 vs 41.8 years, P < .0001) and less likely to smoke (38.3% vs 48.2%, P = .044). Most patients presented with grade III BTAI (54.5% female, 53.6% male), followed by grade IV (19.0% female, 19.5% male). Mean Injury Severity Scores (30.9 + 20.3 female, 30.5 + 18.8 male) and regional Abbreviated Injury Score did not vary by sex. Postoperatively, female patients were less likely to die as inpatients (3.8% vs 7.9%, P = .042) and to be discharged home (41.4% vs 52.2%, P = .008). On multivariate logistic regression, female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 0.05, P = .002) was associated with reduced inpatient mortality. Advanced age (OR: 1.06, P < .001), postoperative transfusion (OR: 1.05, P = .043), increased Injury Severity Score (OR: 1.03, P = .039), postoperative stroke (OR: 9.09, P = .016), postoperative myocardial infarction (OR: 9.9, P = .017), and left subclavian coverage (OR: 2.7, P = .029) were associated with inpatient death. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex is associated with lower odds of inpatient mortality after TEVAR for BTAI, independent of age, injury severity, BTAI grade, and postoperative complications. Further study of the influence of sex on postdischarge outcomes is needed.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Traumatismos Torácicos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Pacientes Internos , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aorta Torácica/lesiones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidados Posteriores , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Alta del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Screening for peripheral artery disease (PAD) with the ankle-brachial index (ABI) test is currently not recommended in the general population; however, previous studies advocate screening in high-risk populations. Although providers may be hesitant to prescribe low-dose rivaroxaban to patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) alone, given the reduction in cardiovascular events and death associated with rivaroxaban, screening for PAD with the ABI test and accordingly prescribing rivaroxaban may provide additional benefits. We sought to describe the cost-effectiveness of screening for PAD in patients with CAD to optimize this high-risk populations' medical management. METHODS: We used a Markov model to evaluate the ABI test in patients with CAD. We assumed that all patients screened would be candidates for low-dose rivaroxaban. We assessed the cost of ABI screening at $100 per patient and added additional charges for physician visits ($100) and rivaroxaban cost ($470 per month). We used a 30-day cycle and performed analysis over 35 years. We evaluated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from previous studies and determined the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) according to our model. We performed a deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses of variables with uncertainty and reported them in a Tornado diagram showing the variables with the greatest effect on the ICER. RESULTS: Our model estimates decision costs to screen or not screen at $94,953 and $82,553, respectively. The QALYs gained from screening was 0.060, generating an ICER of $207,491 per QALY. Factors most influential on the ICER were the reduction in all-cause mortality associated with rivaroxaban and the prohibitively high cost of rivaroxaban. If rivaroxaban cost less than $95 per month, this would make screening cost-effective based on a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: According to our model, screening patients with CAD for PAD to start low-dose rivaroxaban is not currently cost-effective due to insufficient reduction in all-cause mortality and high medication costs. Nevertheless, vascular surgeons have a unique opportunity to prescribe or advocate for low-dose rivaroxaban in patients with PAD to improve cardiovascular outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Índice Tobillo Braquial/economía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/economía , Programas de Detección Diagnóstica , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Programas de Detección Diagnóstica/economía , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/economía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is an effective treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). However, the risks and benefits of administering intraoperative heparin in trauma patients are not well-defined, especially with regard to bleeding complications. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative registry was queried from 2013 to 2019 to identify patients who had undergone TEVAR for BTAI with or without the administration of intraoperative heparin. Univariate analyses were performed with the Student t test, Fisher exact test, or χ2 test, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was then performed to assess the association of heparin with inpatient mortality. RESULTS: A total of 655 patients were included, of whom most had presented with grade III (53.3%) or IV (20%) BTAI. Patients receiving heparin were less likely to have an injury severity score (ISS) of ≥15 (70.2% vs 90.5%; P < .0001) or major head or neck injury (39.6% vs 62.9%; P < .0001). Patients receiving heparin also had a lower incidence of inpatient death (5.1% vs 12.9%; P < .01). Across all injury grades, heparin use was not associated with the need for intraoperative transfusion or postoperative transfusion or the development of hematoma. In patients with grade III BTAI, the nonuse of heparin was associated with an increased risk of lower extremity embolization events (7.4% vs 1.8%; P < .05). On multivariable logistic regression analysis for inpatient mortality, intraoperative heparin use (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.86; P < .05) and female gender (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.11-0.86; P < .05) were associated with better survival, even after controlling for head and neck trauma and injury grade. In contrast, increased age (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.1; P < .001), postoperative transfusion (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P < .01), higher ISS (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P < .05), postoperative dysrhythmia (OR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.10-18.18; P < .05), and postoperative stroke or transient ischemic attack (OR, 5.54; 95% CI, 1.11-27.67; P < .05) were associated with increased odds of inpatient mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative heparin use was associated with reduced inpatient mortality for patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI, including those with major head or neck trauma and high ISSs. Heparin use did not increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications across all injury grades. Also, in patients with grade III BTAI, heparin use was associated with a reduced risk of lower extremity embolic events. Heparin appears to be safe during TEVAR for BTAI and should be administered when no specific contraindication exists.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/lesiones , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Esquema de Medicación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Heparina/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/efectos adversos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Torácicos/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The use of radiographic evaluation of carotid disease may vary, and current guidelines do not strongly recommend the use of cross-sectional imaging (CSI) prior to surgical intervention. We sought to describe the trends in preoperative carotid imaging and evaluate the associated clinical outcomes and Medicare payments for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic carotid disease. METHODS: We used a 20% Medicare sample from 2006 to 2014 identifying patients undergoing CEA for asymptomatic disease. We evaluated preoperative carotid ultrasound and CSI use: CT or MRI of the neck prior to CEA. We calculated average payments of each study from the carrier file and revenue center file. Imaging payments included both the professional component (PC) and the technical component (TC). Claims with a reimbursement of $0 and studies where payment for both the TC and PC could not be identified were excluded from the overall calculation to determine average payment per study. Inpatient reimbursements according to DRG 37-39 were calculated. We compared hospital length of stay (LOS), in hospital stroke, carotid re-exploration, and mortality according to CSI use. RESULTS: A total of 58,993 CEAs were identified with pre-operative carotid imaging. The average age was 74.8 ± 7.5 years, and 56.0% were men. A total of 19,678 (33%) patients had ultrasound alone with an average of (2.4 ± 1.9) exams prior to CEA. A total of 39,315 patients underwent CSI prior to CEA with 2.5 ± 2.1 ultrasounds, 0.95 ± 0.86 neck CTs and 0.47 ± 0.7 MRIs per patient. The average payment for ultrasound was $140 ± 40, $282 ± 94 for CT and $410 ± 146 for MRI. The average inpatient reimbursements were $7,413 ± 4,215 for patients without CSI compared with $7,792 ± 3,921 for patients with CSI, P < 0.001. The average LOS during CEA admission was 2.5 ± 3.7days. Patients with CSI had a slightly lower percentage of patients being discharged by postoperative day 2 compared with ultrasound alone (88.9% vs. 91.5%, respectively, P < 0.001). The overall in-hospital stroke rate was 0.38% and carotid re-exploration rate was 1.0% and there was no statistical significant difference between groups. Median follow-up was 3.9 years, and mortality at 8 years was 50% and did not statistically differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis found preoperative imaging to include CSI in nearly two-thirds of patients prior to CEA for asymptomatic disease. As imaging and inpatient payments were higher with patients with CSI further work is needed to understand when CSI is appropriate prior to surgical intervention to appropriately allocate healthcare resources.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/economía , Endarterectomía Carotidea/economía , Costos de Hospital , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Medicare/economía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía , Ultrasonografía/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/mortalidad , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reoperación/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remains not fully understood. Histological analyses confirm chronic adventitial and medial inflammatory cell infiltration, and its pathophysiology involves the upregulation of proteolytic pathways; added to this, genetic factors have been suggested to favor the susceptibility for AAA. The aim of the present study was to analyze the association between genetic polymorphism of the class II human leukocyte antigens (HLAs, HLA-DRB1) with the susceptibility to develop AAA in Mexican patients and to initiate a pilot study of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs1024611 in the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2) gene to investigate a possible role in the AAA pathogenesis. METHODS: In a cohort of patients with AAA, HLA molecular typing was completed for DRB1 loci with LABType SSO-One Lambda kit in 39 patients (69% men with a mean age of 72 years) and compared with 99 without the disease (60% men, mean age 65 years) (control group). Genotyping of rs1024611 in the MCP-1 gene was performed using TaqMan predesigned SNP genotyping assays in 27 patients with AAA (63% men, mean age of 71). Gene frequencies (gfs) and genotype frequencies (Gfs) were determined; categorical data were analyzed by nonparametric statistic test at significance level (P < 0.05), and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using the STATA v14 software and StatCalc software Epi Info™ 7.2.2.2. RESULTS: Seventy-eight HLA-DRB1 alleles of patients with AAA and 198 from the control group were studied. We observed that the gf of HLA-DRB1*01 was 0.128 in the AAA group compared with 0.05 in the control group (P = 0.03, OR: 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-6.5); the gf of HLA-DRB1*16 was 0.115 in the AAA and 0.025 in control group (P = 0.002, OR: 5, 95% CI: 1.6-16.9). The Gf for SNP rs1024611 were 0.51 in the GA genotype, 0.30 in AA, and 0.19 of GG. Four patients with the proinflammatory homozygous genotype GG (80%) were women and younger than patients with other genotypes, and only one had a history of dyslipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: The dissection and interpretation of an immunogenetic profile in patients with AAA is an active and complex field of research that might assist in a more precise identification of those patients at genetic risk. Our study demonstrated increased frequencies of HLA-DRB1*01 and HLA-DRB1*16 alleles in Mexican patients with AAA compared with an ethnically matched control group.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/genética , Quimiocina CCL2/genética , Sitios Genéticos , Pruebas Genéticas , Cadenas HLA-DRB1/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/inmunología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Marcadores Genéticos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Cadenas HLA-DRB1/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , México , Fenotipo , Proyectos Piloto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2002, Oakes et al described a novel procedure designed to salvage the distal cephalic venous outflow of a Brescia-Cimino fistula by placing a prosthetic graft between the brachial artery in the antecubital space and the cephalic vein at the wrist. In this fashion, the more proximal veins were saved for future procedures. Their approach was reported and found to be successful in the short term, but the long-term durability of the Oakes procedure has not been described. This study aimed to determine the long-term primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates of the brachial to distal cephalic vein Oakes procedure. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospective database in a large, single institution. All patients who underwent the Oakes procedure from 1998 to 2012 were followed up to 2018. We reviewed the time to intervention, type of intervention, patency rates, and mortality of this patient population. RESULTS: Over the 5-year study period, 14 patients were identified who underwent the Oakes procedure, of whom seven (50%) were female. The average age was 55.7 years (range, 38-73 years). All patients had a previously placed Brescia-Cimino that was not suitable for dialysis but was patent. The average number of days to placement of an Oakes brachial to distal cephalic graft was 396 (range, 119-1167) days. A total of 71% (10) of patients underwent an intervention to maintain the graft, of whom 50% (5) underwent an angioplasty and 50% (5) had a thrombectomy/revision procedure. The average number of days to first intervention was 367.3 (range, 21-1048) days from Oakes placement. Of this cohort, 30% (3) of patients had a second intervention, of whom one (33%) underwent an angioplasty and two (66%) had revisions. One patient had a third and a fourth intervention at 39 days and 74 days, respectively, that were both angioplasties. The overall number of days the Oakes procedure remained usable from placement was 843.6 (range, 21-3790) days or 2.3 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that the Oakes procedure may extend the use of the distal dialysis access site by 2.3 years without increasing infection and is hence a durable solution that should be considered in patients requiring dialysis access.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Arteria Braquial/cirugía , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/cirugía , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Venas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Arteria Braquial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Braquial/fisiopatología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/fisiopatología , Diálisis Renal , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Recuperativa/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited reports have documented the effect cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have on arteriovenous (AV) access patency. Current recommendations suggest placing the access on the contralateral side of the CIEDs, as there is concern for increased central venous stenosis and access failure. The goal of this study is to review our single-center AV access patency rates for dialysis patients with an ipsilateral or contralateral side CIED. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from 2008 to 2016 at a single institution identifying all patients who have received a CIED and the diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Medical records were queried to identify each patient's dialysis access and whether it was ipsilateral or contralateral to the CIED. Primary outcomes of study were primary and secondary patency rates. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were identified to have ESRD and CIED. Of these patients, 28 patients with fistulas or grafts (13 ipsilateral and 15 contralateral) had follow-up with regards to their AV access. There were 3 primary failures in both groups. For patients who had the CIED placed after already starting the dialysis, patency was based on when the cardiac device was implanted. Primary patency for ipsilateral and contralateral access was 20.2 and 22.2 months, respectively. With secondary interventions, ipsilateral and contralateral mean patency was 39 and 48.8 months, respectively. Six-month and 1-year primary patency for arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft on patients with ipsilateral access was 69.2% and 53.8%, respectively. Ipsilateral 1-year cumulative patency was 39 months. CONCLUSIONS: CIED may lead to stenosis or occlusion to one's AV access; however, primary assisted and secondary patency rates are still acceptable at 6 months and 1 year compared to Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines. Despite a CIED, a surgeon's algorithm should not lead to the abandonment of an ipsilateral access if the central venous system is patent.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Desfibriladores Implantables , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Marcapaso Artificial , Diálisis Renal , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Anciano , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , California , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Femenino , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/terapia , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Masculino , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in perioperative care, the rate of cardiac events in vascular patients remains high. We have previously shown that infections in trauma patients are associated with higher rates of subsequent cardiac complications, likely due to the additive effect of a second hit of an infection following the trauma. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between postoperative infections and subsequent cardiac events in vascular patients. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective review of demographics, comorbidities, operative interventions, infectious, and cardiac events in all vascular patients who underwent an operative intervention at a single tertiary referral center was performed. In patients with clinical suspicion of myocardial injury, myocardial damage was defined as troponin >0.15 ng/mL and myocardial infarction (MI) as troponin >1 ng/mL. Pneumonia was diagnosed using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and considered positive if BAL fluid culture contained >10,000 colony-forming units (cfu). Urinary tract infection (UTI) was diagnosed if the urine culture contained >100,000 cfu. All other infections were diagnosed by culture data. Regression analysis was performed to assess risk of cardiac events as a function of infections adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,835 vascular operative interventions with the mean age of the cohort 65.5 years (65.9% male). The overall infection rate was 13.2%, with UTI being the most common (60.3%). The overall rate of myocardial damage was 8.1% and the rate of MI 3.8%. Rates of both myocardial damage (15.5 vs. 7.7%; P = 0.0015) and MI (7.1 vs. 3.4%; P = 0.018) were significantly higher in patients with infections, compared to those without infections. Adjusting for age, gender, medical comorbidities, open versus endovascular cases as well as statin and steroid use, patients with UTI were more likely to subsequently develop either myocardial damage (odds ratio [OR] = 3.57 [95% confidence interval = 1.51-8.45]) or MI (OR = 4.20 [1.23-14.3]). A similar association was noted between any infections and either myocardial damage (OR = 2.97 [1.32-6.65]) or MI (OR = 4.31 [1.44-12.94]). CONCLUSIONS: We herein describe an association between postoperative infections, most commonly UTI, and subsequent cardiac events. Efforts should be made to minimize the risk of developing infections to ensure cardioprotection in vascular patients during perioperative period.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Anciano , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rhode Island/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Among patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), smokers have a higher incidence of life- and limb-threatening complications, including lower extremity ischemic rest pain, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death, highlighting the need for smoking reduction. Several studies have previously investigated the perioperative period as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the type of revascularization for PAD (percutaneous versus open) is associated with smoking reduction. METHODS: Study participants included patients seen at a tertiary academic medical center in Providence, RI, between 2005 and 2010 and assigned International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code diagnoses indicative of PAD. This study uses patient-answered surveys and retrospective chart review to assess changes in smoking habits after medical, percutaneous, or open revascularization. Surveys also assessed patient perceptions regarding the influence of intervention on smoking reduction and how strongly patients associate PAD with their smoking habits. RESULTS: Of 54 patients who were active smokers at the time of intervention, 8 (67%) in the medical management group, 12 (50%) in the percutaneous group, and 15 (83%) in the open intervention group reduced smoking by 50% after intervention. After controlling for several confounders, open revascularization was independently associated with smoking reduction when compared with percutaneous intervention (odds ratio, 8.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.18, 76.7; P = 0.043). Surveys revealed that 94% of the patients believed that smoking was a significant contributor to their PAD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAD who undergo open revascularization are more likely to reduce smoking than those who undergo percutaneous revascularization. The perioperative period provides an opportunity to improve rates of smoking reduction.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Centros Médicos Académicos , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Percepción , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/etiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/psicología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rhode Island , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A large vein diameter is associated with higher recanalization rates after endovenous thermal ablation procedures of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and small saphenous vein (SSV). However, relatively few studies have explored the relationship between vein diameter and recanalization rates after mechanochemical ablation (MOCA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with chronic venous insufficiency who underwent MOCA of the GSV or SSV from 2017 to 2021 at a single hospital. Patients with no follow-up ultrasound examination were excluded. Patients were classified as having a large (≥1 cm) or small (<1 cm) treated vein. The primary outcomes were 2-year recanalization and reintervention of the treated segment. RESULTS: A total of 186 MOCA procedures during the study period were analyzed. There was no differences in age, gender, history of venous thromboembolic events, use of anticoagulation, obesity, or length of treated segment between the cohorts. Patients with large veins were less likely to have stasis ulcers compared with those with small veins (3.2% vs 21.5%; P < .05 on Fisher exact test). Patients with large veins had a higher incidence of postoperative local complications (24.2% vs 7.2%, P < .05 on χ2 test). A survival analysis with Cox proportional hazards showed no significant difference in recanalization rates with larger vein diameters. However, obesity was found to correlate significantly with recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: A large vein diameter was not associated with higher recanalization rates after MOCA of the GSVs and SSVs. However, obesity was found to correlate with recanalization rates.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study reviewed the natural history of blunt thoracic aortic trauma (BTAT) over a 14-year period at our level 1 trauma center and compared open vs endovascular treatment. METHODS: All patients with BTAT presenting to a level 1 trauma center from 1998 to 2011 were included in a retrospective analysis. Multiple data points and short-term and midterm outcomes were ascertained through a retrospective record review. RESULTS: We identified 129 patients with BTAT. Of these, 32 (25%) were dead on arrival, 38 (29%) underwent a resuscitative thoracotomy and died, 33 (26%) underwent open repair, 14 (11%) underwent endovascular repair, 9 (7%) underwent simultaneous procedures, and 3 (2%) were managed nonoperatively. Mean Injury Severity Scores and Revised Trauma Scores were similar (P = .484, P = .551) between the open repair group (n = 36) and the endovascular repair group (n = 14). In the open repair group, there were 14 deaths (42%) ≤ 30 days of injury, 3 strokes (9%), 2 patients (6%) with paralysis, 2 myocardial infarctions (MIs; 6%), and 3 patients (9%) who required hemodialysis. In the endovascular group, there was 1 death (7%) ≤ 30 days of injury, 1 (7%) stroke, and 1 (7%) stent collapse. No paralysis, MI, or renal failure requiring hemodialysis was noted in the endovascular group. The average length of stay was 15 days for patients treated with endovascular repair vs 24 days for those treated with open repair (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of BTAT is low but the mortality associated with it is significant. During the 14-year period studied, there was a clear change in management preference from open repair to endovascular repair at our level 1 trauma center. Outcomes, including stroke, MI, renal failure, paralysis, length of stay, and death, appear to be reduced in the endovascular group.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica/lesiones , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía/métodos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parálisis/mortalidad , Parálisis/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sistema de Registros , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rhode Island/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Toracotomía , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mycotic thoracic aortic aneurysms (MTAAs) are a rare yet life-threatening disease. The current standard of care consists of surgical resection, in situ or extra-anatomic revascularization, and antibiotic therapy. Despite this treatment, mortality remains high (range, 5-40%). The endovascular repair of degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysms has been shown to be safe and effective, but its use in the treatment of MTAAs is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to review the use of endovascular repair for MTAAs. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who underwent endovascular repair of MTAAs between March 2001 and March 2011. The surgical results of this single-institution review are reported. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent endovascular repair of MTAAs. One patient died 2 days postoperatively, which gave an in-hospital survival rate of 85.7%. The 1-year survival rate was 71.4%. The mean follow-up time was 25 months (range, 0-72 months), with a survival rate at that time of 57.1%. All patients were free of infection during their follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center case series, endovascular repair of MTAAs was associated with favorable perioperative and short-term mortality and morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Aortografía/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rhode Island , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Extracranial vertebral artery aneurysms are uncommon and are usually associated with trauma or dissection. Primary cervical vertebral aneurysms are even rarer and are not well described. The presentation and natural history are unknown and operative management can be difficult. Accessing aneurysms at the skull base can be difficult and, because the frail arteries are often afflicted with connective tissue abnormalities, direct repair can be particularly challenging. We describe the presentation and surgical management of patients with primary extracranial vertebral artery aneurysms. METHODS: In this study we performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients with primary aneurysms within the extracranial vertebral artery. RESULTS: Between January 2000 and January 2011, 7 patients, aged 12-56 years, were noted to have 9 primary extracranial vertebral artery aneurysms. All had underlying connective tissue or another hereditary disorder, including Ehler-Danlos syndrome (n=3), Marfan's disease (n=2), neurofibromatosis (n=1), and an unspecified connective tissue abnormality (n=1). Eight of 9 aneurysms were managed operatively, including an attempted bypass that ultimately required vertebral ligation; the contralateral aneurysm on this patient has not been treated. Open interventions included vertebral bypass with vein, external carotid autograft, and vertebral transposition to the internal carotid artery. Special techniques were used for handling the anastomoses in patients with Ehler-Danlos syndrome. Although endovascular exclusion was not performed in isolation, 2 hybrid procedures were performed. There were no instances of perioperative stroke or death. CONCLUSIONS: Primary extracranial vertebral artery aneurysms are rare and occur in patients with hereditary disorders. Operative intervention is warranted in symptomatic patients. Exclusion and reconstruction may be performed with open and hybrid techniques with low morbidity and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Arteria Vertebral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía Cerebral , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
We report a rare case of nonaneurysmal infectious aortitis (IA) with the causative microorganism being Escherichia coli. The patient was a 78-year-old man who presented with a 3-week history of abdominal pain, fevers, and anorexia after treatment for a urinary tract infection. The patient had positive blood cultures and a computed tomography scan that had signs of IA. He was treated with intravenous antibiotics and extra-anatomic revascularization with excision and debridement of the infected aortic segment with a good outcome. IA is an uncommon condition with a high mortality rate; however, if diagnosed early, it can be successfully treated.
Asunto(s)
Aortitis/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Aortitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortitis/terapia , Aortografía/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Desbridamiento , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/complicaciones , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has grown as a possible alternative for the treatment of extracranial cerebrovascular disease in the past decade. A preexisting contralateral carotid artery occlusion has been described as a risk factor for inferior outcomes after carotid endarterectomy, but its impact on CAS outcomes is less understood. METHODS: A retrospective review of 417 CAS procedures performed between May 2001 and July 2010 at a single center using self-expanding nitinol stents and mechanical embolic protection devices was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups, those with a preexisting contralateral carotid occlusion (group A, n = 39) versus those without a contralateral occlusion (group B, n = 378). Patient demographics and comorbidities as well as 30-day and late death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) rates were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 4 years (range: 0-9.4 years). RESULTS: Overall, mean age of the 314 men and 103 women was 70.5 years. In group A, there were two (5.1%) octogenarians and nine patients (23.1%) with symptomatic disease as compared with group B with 53 (14%) octogenarians and 121 (32%) patients with symptomatic disease. The overall 30-day death, stroke, and MI rates were 0.5%, 1.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. When comparing group A with group B, these results were not significantly different: death (0% vs. 0.5%), stroke (2.6% vs. 1.9%), and MI (0% vs. 0.8%). Long-term outcomes for groups A and B were also not significantly different: death (25.6% vs. 22.2%), stroke (5.3% vs. 3.4%), and MI (15.4% vs. 14%) (p = nonsignificant). CONCLUSION: A preexisting contralateral carotid artery occlusion does not seem to adversely impact CAS outcomes.