Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Acta Oncol ; 53(7): 939-44, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24456504

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgery followed by radiotherapy and concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is standard therapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Bevacizumab combined with irinotecan produces impressive response rates in recurrent GBM. In a randomized phase II study, we investigated the efficacy of neoadjuvant bevacizumab combined with irinotecan (Bev-Iri) versus bevacizumab combined with temozolomide (Bev-Tem) before, during and after radiotherapy in newly diagnosed GBM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After surgery, patients were randomized to Bev-Iri or Bev-Tem for eight weeks, followed by standard radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions) and concomitant Bev-Iri or Bev-Tem followed by adjuvant Bev-Iri or Bev-Tem for another eight weeks. Bev-Iri: Bevacizumab and irinotecan were given every 14 days before, during and after radiotherapy. Bev-Tem: Bevacizumab was given as in Bev-Iri and temozolomide was given for five days every four weeks before and after radiotherapy and once daily during radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a pre-specified response rate of 30% or more was considered of interest for future studies. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. RESULTS: The response rate was 32% (95% CI 17-51%) for Bev-Tem (n = 32) and 23% (95% CI 9-44%) for Bev-Iri (n = 31) (p = 0.56). Median PFS was 7.7 and 7.3 months for Bev-Tem and Bev-Iri, respectively. Hematological toxicity was more frequent with Bev-Tem including one death from febrile neutropenia whereas non-hematological toxicity was manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Only the Bev-Tem arm met the pre-specified level of activity of interest. Our results did not indicate any benefit from Bev-Iri in first-line therapy as opposed to Bev-Tem in terms of response and PFS.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Humanos , Irinotecán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Temozolomida , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 41(7): 1095-100, 2005 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15862760

RESUMEN

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) inhibits the activation of the plasminogen activator system, the latter being involved in cancer growth and dissemination. Interestingly, PAI-1 is elevated in many solid tumours and this elevation has consistently been shown to be associated with shorter length of patient survival. This study aims to determine whether PAI-1 contributes to cancer cell growth by inhibiting apoptosis of tumour cells. It is shown that spontaneous transformation decreases cellular sensitivity to chemotherapy-mediated apoptosis of wild-type, but not PAI-1 gene-deficient, fibrosarcomas. PAI-1 gene-deficient and wild-type mice displayed similar sensitivity to treatment with etoposide, suggesting a differential effect of PAI-1 expression between cancer cells and normal cells. Thus, since PAI-1 appears to be an important factor in regulating apoptosis in cancer cells but not in normal cells, inhibitors of PAI-1 might be useful as sensitising pre-treatment for subsequent apoptosis-inducing anti-cancer therapy.


Asunto(s)
Apoptosis/fisiología , Fibroblastos/patología , Fibrosarcoma/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Inhibidor 1 de Activador Plasminogénico/genética , Animales , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/farmacología , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Western Blotting , Transformación Celular Neoplásica , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Etopósido/farmacología , Fibrosarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Ratones , Inhibidor 1 de Activador Plasminogénico/deficiencia
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 18(17): 4491-7, 2012 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22829199

RESUMEN

The European Commission issued on March 17, 2011, a marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union (EU) for eribulin (Halaven; Eisai Limited). The decision was based on the favorable opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use recommending a marketing authorization for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have progressed after at least 2 chemotherapeutic regimens for advanced disease. Eribulin mesylate is a structurally simplified synthetic analogue of halichondrin B, which is a natural product isolated from the marine sponge Halichondria okadai (ATC code L01XX41). Eribulin is a nontaxane, microtubule dynamics inhibitor belonging to the halichondrin class of antineoplastic agents. Eribulin inhibits the growth phase of microtubules without affecting the shortening phase and sequesters tubulin into nonproductive aggregates leading to G(2)-M cell-cycle block, disruption of mitotic spindles, and, ultimately, apoptotic cell death after prolonged mitotic blockage. The recommended dose of eribulin is 1.23 mg/m(2) (equivalent to 1.4 mg/m(2) eribulin mesylate) to be administered intravenously over 2 to 5 min on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. In the pivotal trial, eribulin was associated with increased overall survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who received at least 2 prior chemotherapy lines for advanced disease (median overall survival was 13.2 months in the eribulin arm vs. 10.6 months in the control arm; HR = 0.805; 95% confidence interval, 0.677-0.958; P = 0.014). The most common side effects are asthenia or fatigue and neutropenia. The objective of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The detailed scientific assessment report and product information, including the summary report and product information, including product characteristics, are available on the European Medicines Agency website.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Furanos , Cetonas , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Furanos/administración & dosificación , Furanos/efectos adversos , Furanos/química , Furanos/farmacocinética , Agencias de los Sistemas de Salud , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Cetonas/administración & dosificación , Cetonas/efectos adversos , Cetonas/química , Cetonas/farmacocinética , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA