Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 108: 127-140, 2024 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The treatment of acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) has evolved over the last several decades with the availability of several new treatment modalities. This study was undertaken to evaluate the contemporary presentation and outcomes of ALLI patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from a prospectively collected database of all patients who presented to our tertiary referral hospital with acute ischemia of the lower extremity between May 2016 and October 2020. The cause of death was obtained from the Michigan State Death Registry. RESULTS: During the study period, 233 patients (251 lower limbs) were evaluated for ALLI. Seventy-three percent had thrombotic occlusion, 24% had embolic occlusion, and 3% due to a low flow state. Rutherford classification of ischemia severity was 7%, 49%, 40%, and 4% for Rutherford grade I, IIA, IIB, and III, respectively. Five percent underwent primary amputations, and 6% received medical therapy only. The mean length of stay was 11 ± 9 days. Nineteen percent of patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. At 30 days postoperatively, mortality was 9% and limb loss was 19%. On multivariate analysis, 1 or no vessel runoff to the foot postoperatively was associated with higher 30-day limb loss. Patients with no run-off vessels postoperatively had significantly higher 30-day mortality. Cardiovascular complications accounted for most deaths (48%). At 1-year postoperatively, mortality and limb loss reached 17% and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in treatment modalities and cardiovascular care, patients presenting with ALLI continue to have high mortality, limb loss, and readmission rates at 30 days.

2.
J Vasc Surg ; 77(5): 1339-1348.e6, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36657501

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Aberrant subclavian artery (ASA) and Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) are rare vascular anomalies that may be associated with lifestyle-limiting and life-threatening complications. The aim of this study is to report contemporary outcomes after invasive treatment of ASA/KD using a large international dataset. METHODS: Patients who underwent treatment for ASA/KD (2000-2020) were identified through the Vascular Low Frequency Disease Consortium, a multi-institutional collaboration to investigate uncommon vascular disorders. We report the early and mid-term clinical outcomes including stroke and mortality, technical success, and other operative outcomes including reintervention rates, patency, and endoleak. RESULTS: Overall, 285 patients were identified during the study period. The mean patient age was 57 years; 47% were female and 68% presented with symptoms. A right-sided arch was present in 23%. The mean KD diameter was 47.4 mm (range, 13.0-108.0 mm). The most common indication for treatment was symptoms (59%), followed by aneurysm size (38%). The most common symptom reported was dysphagia (44%). A ruptured KD was treated in 4.2% of cases, with a mean diameter of 43.9 mm (range, 18.0-100.0 mm). An open procedure was performed in 101 cases (36%); the most common approach was ASA ligation with subclavian transposition. An endovascular or hybrid approach was performed in 184 patients (64%); the most common approach was thoracic endograft and carotid-subclavian bypass. A staged operative strategy was employed more often than single setting repair (55% vs 45%). Compared with endovascular or hybrid approach, those in the open procedure group were more likely to be younger (49 years vs 61 years; P < .0001), female (64% vs 36%; P < .0001), and symptomatic (85% vs 59%; P < .0001). Complete or partial symptomatic relief at 1 year after intervention was 82.6%. There was no association between modality of treatment and symptom relief (open 87.2% vs endovascular or hybrid approach 78.9%; P = .13). After the intervention, 11 subclavian occlusions (4.5%) occurred; 3 were successfully thrombectomized resulting in a primary and secondary patency of 95% and 96%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 39 months. Among the 33 reinterventions (12%), the majority were performed for endoleak (36%), and more reinterventions occurred in the endovascular or hybrid approach than open procedure group (15% vs 6%; P = .02). The overall survival rate was 87.3% at a median follow-up of 41 months. The 30-day stroke and death rates were 4.2% and 4.9%, respectively. Urgent or emergent presentation was independently associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 19.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-116.6), overall mortality (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.2-11.2) and intraoperative complications (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 2.8-25.1). Females had a higher risk of reintervention (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0-6.5). At an aneurysm size of 44.4 mm, receiver operator characteristic curve analysis suggested that 60% of patients would have symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of ASA/KD can be performed safely with low rates of mortality, stroke and reintervention and high rates of symptomatic relief, regardless of the repair strategy. Symptomatic and urgent operations were associated with worse outcomes in general, and female gender was associated with a higher likelihood of reintervention. Given the worse overall outcomes when symptomatic and the inherent risk of rupture, consideration of repair at 40 mm is reasonable in most patients. ASA/KD can be repaired in asymptomatic patients with excellent outcomes and young healthy patients may be considered better candidates for open approaches versus endovascular or hybrid modalities, given the lower likelihood of reintervention and lower early mortality rate.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Divertículo , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Endofuga/etiología , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/cirugía , Aneurisma/complicaciones , Arteria Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Subclavia/cirugía , Arteria Subclavia/anomalías , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Divertículo/diagnóstico por imagen , Divertículo/cirugía , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 95: 23-31, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37236537

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aberrant subclavian artery (ASA) with or without Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) is a rare anatomic aortic arch anomaly that can cause dysphagia and/or life-threatening rupture. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of ASA/KD repair in patients with a left versus right aortic arch. METHODS: Using the Vascular Low Frequency Disease Consortium methodology, a retrospective review was performed of patients ≥18 years old with surgical treatment of ASA/KD from 2000 to 2020 at 20 institutions. RESULTS: 288 patients with ASA with or without KD were identified; 222 left-sided aortic arch (LAA), and 66 right-sided aortic arch (RAA). Mean age at repair was younger in LAA 54 vs. 58 years (P = 0.06). Patients in RAA were more likely to undergo repair due to symptoms (72.7% vs. 55.9%, P = 0.01), and more likely to present with dysphagia (57.6% vs. 39.1%, P < 0.01). The hybrid open/endovascular approach was the most common repair type in both groups. Rates of intraoperative complications, death within 30 days, return to the operating room, symptom relief and endoleaks were not significantly different. For patients with symptom status follow-up data, in LAA, 61.7% had complete relief, 34.0% had partial relief and 4.3% had no change. In RAA, 60.7% had complete relief, 34.4% had partial relief and 4.9% had no change. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ASA/KD, RAA patients were less common than LAA, presented more frequently with dysphagia, had symptoms as an indication for intervention, and underwent treatment at a younger age. Open, endovascular and hybrid repair approaches appear equally effective, regardless of arch laterality.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Divertículo , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Enfermedades Vasculares , Adolescente , Humanos , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aorta Torácica/anomalías , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Divertículo/diagnóstico por imagen , Divertículo/cirugía , Divertículo/complicaciones , Cardiopatías Congénitas/complicaciones , Arteria Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Subclavia/cirugía , Arteria Subclavia/anomalías , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
J Vasc Surg ; 73(1): 179-188, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32437951

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In-stent stenosis is a frequent complication of superficial femoral artery (SFA) endovascular intervention and can lead to stent occlusion or symptom recurrence. Arterial duplex stent imaging (ADSI) can be used in the surveillance for recurrent stenosis; however, its uniform application is controversial. In this study, we aimed to determine, in patients undergoing SFA stent implantation, whether surveillance with ADSI yielded a better outcome than in those with only ankle-brachial index (ABI) follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing SFA stent implantation for occlusive disease at a tertiary care referral center between 2009 and 2016. The patients were divided into those with ADSI and those with ABI follow-up only. Life-table analysis comparing stent patency, major adverse limb events (MALEs), limb salvage, and mortality between groups was performed. RESULTS: There were 248 patients with SFA stent implantation included, 160 in the ADSI group and 88 in the ABI group. Groups were homogeneous in clinical indications of claudication and critical limb-threatening ischemia (for ADSI, 39% and 61%; for ABI, 38% and 62%; P = .982) and TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus class A, B, C, and D lesions (for ADSI, 17%, 45%, 16%, and 22%; for ABI, 21%, 43%, 16%, and 20%; P = .874). Primary patency was similar between groups at 12, 36, and 56 months (ADSI, 65%, 43%, and 32%; ABI, 69%, 34%, and 34%; P = .770), whereas ADSI patients showed an improved assisted primary patency (84%, 68%, and 54%) vs ABI patients (76%, 38%, and 38%; P = .008) and secondary patency. There was greater freedom from MALEs in the ADSI group (91%, 76%, and 64%) vs the ABI group (79%, 46%, and 46%; P < .001) at 12, 36, and 56 months of follow-up. ADSI patients were more likely to undergo an endovascular procedure as their initial post-SFA stent implantation intervention (P = .001), whereas ABI patients were more likely to undergo an amputation (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In SFA stent implantation, patients with ADSI follow-up demonstrate an advantage in assisted primary patency and secondary patency and are more likely to undergo an endovascular reintervention. These factors are likely to have effected a decrease in MALEs, indicating the benefit of a more universal adoption of post-SFA stent implantation follow-up ADSI.


Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Stents , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex/métodos , Anciano , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Periodo Posoperatorio , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Vascular ; 29(6): 856-864, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33504279

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The unprecedented pandemic spread of the novel coronavirus has severely impacted the delivery of healthcare services in the United States and around the world, and has exposed a variety of inefficiencies in healthcare infrastructure. Some states have been disproportionately affected such as New York and Michigan. In fact, Detroit and its surrounding areas have been named as the initial Midwest epicenter where over 106,000 cases have been confirmed in April 2020. METHOD, RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Facilities in Southeast Michigan have served as the frontline of the pandemic in the Midwest and in order to cope with the surge, rapid, and in some cases, complete restructuring of care was mandatory to effect change and attempt to deal with the emerging crisis. We describe the initial experience and response of 4 large vascular surgery health systems in Michigan to COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , Reestructuración Hospitalaria , Control de Infecciones , Asignación de Recursos , Enfermedades Vasculares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/terapia , Defensa Civil/normas , Reestructuración Hospitalaria/métodos , Reestructuración Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Michigan/epidemiología , Innovación Organizacional , Selección de Paciente , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
J Vasc Surg ; 72(4): 1184-1195.e3, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682063

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, central venous access line teams were implemented at many hospitals throughout the world to provide access for critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to describe the structure, practice patterns, and outcomes of these vascular access teams during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-reported study of central venous access line teams in hospitals afflicted with the COVID-19 pandemic. To participate in the study, hospitals were required to meet one of the following criteria: development of a formal plan for a central venous access line team during the pandemic; implementation of a central venous access line team during the pandemic; placement of central venous access by a designated practice group during the pandemic as part of routine clinical practice; or management of an iatrogenic complication related to central venous access in a patient with COVID-19. RESULTS: Participants from 60 hospitals in 13 countries contributed data to the study. Central venous line teams were most commonly composed of vascular surgery and general surgery attending physicians and trainees. Twenty sites had 2657 lines placed by their central venous access line team or designated practice group. During that time, there were 11 (0.4%) iatrogenic complications associated with central venous access procedures performed by the line team or group at those 20 sites. Triple lumen catheters, Cordis (Santa Clara, Calif) catheters, and nontunneled hemodialysis catheters were the most common types of central venous lines placed by the teams. Eight (14%) sites reported experience in placing central venous lines in prone, ventilated patients with COVID-19. A dedicated line cart was used by 35 (59%) of the hospitals. Less than 50% (24 [41%]) of the participating sites reported managing thrombosed central lines in COVID-19 patients. Twenty-three of the sites managed 48 iatrogenic complications in patients with COVID-19 (including complications caused by providers outside of the line team or designated practice group). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a dedicated central venous access line team during a pandemic or other health care crisis is a way by which physicians trained in central venous access can contribute their expertise to a stressed health care system. A line team composed of physicians with vascular skill sets provides relief to resource-constrained intensive care unit, ward, and emergency medicine teams with a low rate of iatrogenic complications relative to historical reports. We recommend that a plan for central venous access line team implementation be in place for future health care crises.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/virología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Vasc Surg ; 69(5): 1437-1443, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30552038

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The association between socioeconomic status (SES) and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is largely unknown. This study aimed to determine the influence of SES on postoperative survival after AAA repair. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of AAA at a tertiary referral center between January 1993 and July 2013 were retrospectively collected. Thirty-day postoperative mortality and long-term mortality were documented through medical record review and the Michigan Social Security Death Index. SES was quantified using the neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), which is a standardized and reproducible index used in research that summarizes eight domains of socioeconomic deprivation and is based on census tracts derived from patients' individual addresses. The association between SES and survival was studied by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 767 patients were included. The mean age was 73 years; 80% were male, 77% were white, and 20% were African American. There was no difference in SES of patients who underwent open vs endovascular repair of AAA (P = .489). The average NDI was -0.18 (minimum, -1.47; maximum, 2.35). After adjusting for the variables that were significant on univariable analysis (age, medical comorbidities, length of stay, and year of surgery), the association between NDI and long-term mortality was significant (P = .021; hazard ratio, 1.21 [1.05-1.37]). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term mortality after AAA repair is associated with SES. Further studies are required to assess which risk factors (behavioral, psychosocial) are responsible for this decreased long-term survival in low SES patients after AAA repair.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Clase Social , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pobreza , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
8.
J Vasc Surg ; 69(3): 913-920, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30292616

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a frequently used quality outcome marker after peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). Whereas the factors associated with CIN development have been well documented, the long-term renal effects of CIN after PVI are unknown. This study was undertaken to investigate the long-term (1-year) renal consequences of CIN after PVI and to identify factors associated with renal function deterioration at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, patients who had PVI at our institution (who were part of a statewide Vascular Interventions Collaborative) were queried for those who developed CIN. CIN was defined by the Collaborative as an increase in serum creatinine concentration of at least 0.5 mg/dL within 30 days after intervention. Preprocedural dialysis patients or patients without postprocedural creatinine values were excluded. Preprocedural, postprocedural, and 1-year serum creatinine values were abstracted and used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). ΔGFR was defined as preprocedural GFR minus 1-year GFR. Univariate and multivariate analyses for ΔGFR were performed to determine factors associated with renal deterioration at 1 year. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2015, there were 1323 PVIs performed; 881 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 57 (6.5%) developed CIN; 47% were male, and 51% had baseline chronic kidney disease. CIN resolved by discharge in 30 patients (53%). Using multivariate linear regression, male sex (P = .027) and congestive heart failure (P = .048) were associated with 1-year GFR decline. Periprocedural variables related to 1-year GFR decline included percentage increase in 30-day postprocedural creatinine concentration (P = .025), whereas CIN resolution by discharge (mean, 13.1 days) was protective for renal function at 1 year (P = .02). A post hoc analysis was performed with 50 PVI patients (randomly selected) who did not develop CIN, comparing their late renal function with that of the CIN group stratified by the periprocedural 30-day variables. Patients with CIN resolution at discharge had similar 1-year renal outcomes to non-CIN patients, whereas the CIN-persistent (at discharge) patients had greater renal deterioration at 1 year compared with non-CIN patients (P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex and congestive heart failure are risk factors for further renal function decline in patients developing CIN after PVI. The magnitude and duration of increase in creatinine concentration (CIN persistence at discharge) correlated with late progressive renal dysfunction in CIN patients, suggesting that early-resolving CIN is relatively benign.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Creatinina/sangre , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Riñón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
9.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 56: 1-10, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30500628

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with aortic native and prosthetic infections is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We describe a single-center experience with the use of cryopreserved allografts for the treatment of aortic infections, and compare outcomes with rifampin-soaked grafts and extra-anatomic bypass. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent an operative intervention for aortic infection at our tertiary care center from August 2007 to August 2017. Demographic data, preoperative work-up, procedural details, and outcomes were collected for each treatment modality. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients had aortic revascularization for aortic infection. Seventeen patients had cryopreserved allografts, 10 had rifampin-soaked grafts, and 5 had extra-anatomic bypass. Sixteen patients (50%) had native aortic infection and 16 patients (50%) had prosthetic aortic infection. Eighteen had involvement of the infrarenal abdominal aorta, 12 of the paravisceral aorta, and 2 of the descending thoracic aorta. Early mortality was 5.9% (1/17) for the cryopreserved group, 10% (1/10) for the rifampin-soaked group, and 40% (2/5) for the extra-anatomic bypass group. Early graft-related complications occurred in 1 patient (cryopreserved group). Mean follow-up was 34.8 months. Late death occurred in 4 patients with cryopreserved allografts, 2 with rifampin-soaked grafts and none with extra-anatomic bypass. Late graft-related complications occurred in 4 patients (cryopreserved group). Only 1 patient had recurrence of aortic infection (cryopreserved group) and 2 patients had limb loss (1 from the cryopreserved group and 1 from the rifampin-soaked group). At 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years, estimated survival for patients with cryopreserved allografts was 94%, 82%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The management of aortic infections is challenging. In patients who do not need immediate intervention, in situ aortic reconstruction with cryopreserved allografts is a viable treatment modality with relatively low morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Criopreservación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Abdominal/microbiología , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/microbiología , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rifampin/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Vasc Surg ; 68(5): 1308-1313, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29945839

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cerebrovascular injury (CVI) is a recognized but underappreciated complication of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). This study was performed to determine risk factors for CVI associated with ATBAD and, in particular, the possible contributory role of aggressive anti-impulse therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients presenting to a tertiary medical center with an ATBAD between January 2003 and October 2012 was conducted. All CVIs were adjudicated by a vascular neurologist and assigned a probable cause. The initial intensity of anti-impulse therapy was defined as the difference in mean arterial pressure (ΔMAP) from presentation to subsequent admission to the intensive care unit. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were identified. The average age was 61 years; 64% were male, and 59% were African American. Twenty patients required operative intervention (14 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs and 6 open). CVI occurred in 13 patients (11.6%): 9 were hypoperfusion related (6 diffuse hypoxic brain injuries and 3 watershed infarcts), 2 were procedure related (both thoracic endovascular aortic repairs), 1 was an intracranial hemorrhage on presentation, and 1 was a probable embolic stroke on presentation. CVI patients had demographics and comorbidities comparable to those of the non-CVI patients. CVI was associated with operative intervention (54% vs 13%; P = .002). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in CVI patients (54% vs 6%; P < .001). Patients who suffered a hypoperfusion brain injury had a higher MAP on presentation to the emergency department (142 mm Hg vs 120 mm Hg; P = .034) and a significantly greater reduction in MAP (ΔMAP 49 mm Hg vs 15 mm Hg; P < .001) by the time they reached the intensive care unit compared with the non-CVI patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, CVI in ATBAD is more frequent than previously reported and is associated with increased mortality. The most common causes are related to cerebral hypoperfusion. Higher MAP on presentation and greater decline in MAP are associated risk factors for hypoperfusion-related CVI. A less aggressive approach to lowering MAP in ATBAD warrants further study in an attempt to reduce CVI in ATBAD.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Presión Arterial , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/fisiopatología , Disección Aórtica/terapia , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/terapia , Presión Arterial/efectos de los fármacos , Circulación Cerebrovascular/efectos de los fármacos , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
11.
J Vasc Surg ; 68(3): 739-748, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29571627

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: It is not clear whether endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) results in an increase in renal insufficiency during the long term compared with open repair (OR). We reviewed our experience with AAA repair to determine whether there was a significant difference in postoperative and long-term renal outcomes between OR and EVAR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent AAA repair between January 1993 and July 2013 at a tertiary referral hospital. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative laboratory values, morbidity, and mortality were collected. Patients with ruptured AAAs, preoperative hemodialysis, juxtarenal or suprarenal aneurysm origin, and no follow-up laboratory values were excluded. Preoperative, postoperative, 6-month, and yearly serum creatinine values were collected. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated on the basis of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was classified using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Change in GFR was defined as preoperative GFR minus the GFR at each follow-up interval. Comparison was made between EVAR and OR groups using multivariate logistics for categorical data and linear regression for continuous variables. RESULTS: During the study period, 763 infrarenal AAA repairs were performed at our institution; 675 repairs fit the inclusion criteria (317 ORs and 358 EVARs). Mean age was 73.9 years. Seventy-nine percent were male, 78% were hypertensive, 18% were diabetic, and 31% had preoperative renal dysfunction defined as GFR below 60 mL/min. Using a multivariate logistic model to control for all variables, OR was found to have a 1.6 times greater chance for development of immediate postoperative AKI compared with EVAR (P = .038). Hypertension and aneurysm size were independent risk factors for development of AKI (P = .012 and .022, respectively). Using a linear regression model to look at GFR decline during several years, there was a greater decline in GFR in the EVAR group. This became significant starting at postoperative year 4. AKI and preoperative renal dysfunction were independent risk factors for long-term decline in renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Although AKI is less likely to occur after EVAR, patients undergoing EVAR experience a significant but delayed decline in GFR over time compared with OR. This became apparent after postoperative year 4. Studies comparing EVAR and OR may need longer follow-up to detect clinically significant differences in renal function.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 84: 405, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35248741
13.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 39: 182-188, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27531092

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate and define the expected flow pattern changes of carotid artery duplex ultrasound after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. METHODS: Retrospective review of Henry Ford Hospital database of patients who had undergone LVAD placement between March 2008 and July 2012 was performed. All patients who had carotid artery duplex scanning before and after LVAD placement within 2 years of each other and showed <50% stenosis were included in this study. Type of waveform, carotid peak systolic velocity, and end-diastolic velocities were analyzed, and the values were compared before and after LVAD placement. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients with LVAD had at least 2 carotid duplex studies before and after LVAD placement within 2 years of each other. Of those, 92% (n = 12) were men, and 61% (n = 8) were Caucasian. Mean age was 61 years old. The HeartWare ventricular assist device was implanted in 4 patients and the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device was implanted in 9 patients. Post-LVAD Doppler imaging demonstrated parvus tardus waveform. Analysis of flow velocities revealed that peak systolic velocity was diminished after LVAD placement in both the internal and common carotid arteries (P = 0.006 and P < 0.0001, respectively). End-diastolic velocity, however, increased post-LVAD (P < 0.0001). Interestingly, mean flow velocities in both the common and internal carotid arteries remained stable after LVAD placement. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals changes in waveform morphology and peak systolic and diastolic velocities in the common and internal carotid arteries on carotid duplex after LVAD placement. Additionally, it shows that despite changes in post-LVAD pulse pressure in the carotid arteries, the mean flow velocity remained unchanged.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Carótida Común/fisiopatología , Estenosis Carotídea/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Presión Sanguínea , Arteria Carótida Común/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Carótida Interna/fisiopatología , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Bases de Datos Factuales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color
14.
J Vasc Surg ; 63(3): 710-4, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26916583

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of carotid duplex examination prior to cardiac surgery have been questioned by the multidisciplinary committee creating the 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Peripheral Vascular Laboratory Testing. We report the clinical outcomes and postoperative neurologic symptoms in patients who underwent carotid duplex ultrasound prior to open heart surgery at a tertiary institution. METHODS: Using the combined databases from our clinical vascular laboratory and the Society of Thoracic Surgery, a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent carotid duplex ultrasound within 13 months prior to open heart surgery from March 2005 to March 2013 was performed. The outcomes between those who underwent carotid duplex scanning (group A) and those who did not (group B) were compared. RESULTS: Among 3233 patients in the cohort who underwent cardiac surgery, 515 (15.9%) patients underwent a carotid duplex ultrasound preoperatively, and 2718 patients did not (84.1%). Among the patients who underwent carotid screening vs no screening, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk factors of cerebrovascular disease (10.9% vs 12.7%; P = .26), prior stroke (8.2% vs 7.2%; P = .41), and prior transient ischemic attack (2.9% vs 3.3%; P = .24). For those undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 306 (17.8%) of 1723 patients underwent preoperative carotid duplex ultrasound. Among patients who had carotid screening prior to CABG, the incidence of carotid disease was low: 249 (81.4%) had minimal or mild stenosis (<50%); 25 (8.2%) had unilateral moderate stenosis (50%-69%); 10 (3.3%) had bilateral moderate stenosis; 9 (2.9%) had unilateral severe stenosis (70%-99%); 5 (1.6%) had contralateral moderate stenosis; 2 (0.7%) had bilateral severe stenosis; 4 (1.3%) had unilateral occluded with contralateral less than 50% stenosis, 1 (0.3%) had unilateral occluded with contralateral (70%-99%) stenosis; and 1 had bilateral occluded carotid arteries. Primary outcomes of patients who underwent isolated CABG showed no difference in the perioperative mortality (2.9% vs 4.3%; P = .27) and stroke (2.9% vs 2.6%; P = .70) between patients undergoing preoperative duplex scanning and those who did not. Primary outcomes of patients who underwent open heart surgery also showed no difference in the perioperative mortality (5.1% vs 6.9%; P = .14) and stroke (2.6% vs 2.4%; P = .85) between patients undergoing preoperative duplex scanning and those who did not. Operative intervention of severe carotid stenosis prior to isolated CABG occurred in 2 of the 17 patients (11.8%) identified who underwent carotid endarterectomy with CABG. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the correlation between preoperative duplex-documented high-grade carotid stenosis and postoperative stroke was low. Prudent use of preoperative carotid duplex ultrasound should be based on the presence of cerebrovascular symptoms and the type of open heart surgery.


Asunto(s)
Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Anciano , Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
J Vasc Surg ; 64(5): 1239-1245, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27374067

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on the course of many disease states has been documented in the literature but has not been studied in aortic dissection. This study evaluated the effect of SES on 30-day and long-term survival of patients after aortic dissection. METHODS: Hospital discharge records were used to identify patients with acute aortic dissection. Patient demographics, insurance status, comorbidities, and 30-day mortality were collected. Home addresses were used to estimate each patient's median household income, and the neighborhood deprivation index, a measure of SES, was determined. Long-term survival was assessed by review of the Social Security Death Index. Associations between demographics, insurance status, comorbidities, and poverty level were investigated to determine their effect on survival. RESULTS: There were 212 aortic dissections; of which, 118 were type A and 94 were type B. Median follow-up was 7.6 years. The neighborhood deprivation index (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.78; P = .001) was associated with reduced long-term survival and was also significantly associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.93; P = .02). The mean neighborhood deprivation index score was higher in patients with type B aortic dissections (0.45 ± 0.93) than in those with type A aortic dissections (0.16 ± 0.96; P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a lower SES had reduced short-term and long-term survival after aortic dissection. Patients with type B dissection live in lower socioeconomic neighborhoods than patients with type A dissection.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/terapia , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/terapia , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Renta , Seguro de Salud , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Pobreza , Sistema de Registros , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Vasc Surg ; 62(2): 417-23, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26054591

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Mechanical assist devices have found an increasingly important role in high-risk interventional cardiac procedures. The Impella (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, Mass) is a percutaneous left ventricular assist device inserted through the femoral artery under fluoroscopic guidance and positioned in the left ventricular cavity. This study was undertaken to assess the incidence of vascular complications and associated morbidity and mortality that can occur with Impella placement. METHODS: We used a prospective database to review patients who underwent placement of an Impella left ventricular assist device in our tertiary referral center from July 2010 to December 2013. Patient demographics, comorbidities, interventional complications, and 30-day mortality were recorded. RESULTS: The study included 90 patients (60% male). Mean age was 66 years (range, 17-97 years). Hypertension was found in 69% of the patients, 37% were diabetic, 57% had a history of tobacco abuse, and 65% had chronic renal insufficiency. The median preprocedure cardiac ejection fraction was 30%. Most (87%) had undergone coronary artery intervention. Cardiogenic shock was documented in 67 patients (74%). The Impella was placed for an average of 1 day (range, 0-5 days). At least one vascular complication occurred in 15 patients (17%). Acute limb ischemia occurred in 12 patients; of whom four required an amputation and six required open or endovascular surgery. Other complications included groin hematomas and one pseudoaneurysm. All-patient 30-day mortality was 50%, which was not significantly associated with vascular complications. Female sex and cardiogenic shock at the time of insertion were associated with vascular complications (P = .043 and P = .018, respectfully). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular complications are common with placement of the Impella percutaneous left ventricular assist device (17%) and are related to emergency procedures. Vascular complications in this high-risk patient population frequently lead to withdrawal of care. These data provide quality improvement targets for left ventricular assist device programs.


Asunto(s)
Extremidades/irrigación sanguínea , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Isquemia/epidemiología , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Femenino , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Hematoma/epidemiología , Hematoma/etiología , Hematoma/mortalidad , Hematoma/terapia , Humanos , Incidencia , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia , Adulto Joven
17.
J Vasc Surg ; 59(6): 1488-94, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24709440

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to review our 27-year clinical experience with open proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, with a focus on long-term survival. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all patients who underwent proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between 1986 and 2013 at a tertiary care referral center. Demographics, operative variables, complications, and 30-day mortality were analyzed. Postoperative acute kidney injury was analyzed by the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease)/Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. Long-term survival was assessed through review of electronic medical records and the Social Security Death Index. Associations between demographics and complications were investigated to determine predictors of long-term survival. RESULTS: The study identified 245 patients. Mean age was 71 years (range, 38-92 years); 69% were men, and 88% were white. Aneurysm type was juxtarenal in 127 patients (52%), suprarenal in 68 patients (28%), and type IV thoracoabdominal in 50 patients (20%). In-hospital mortality was 3.3% (eight patients), and 30-day mortality was 2.9% (seven patients). At least one major complication occurred in 64% of the patients, which included the following: acute kidney injury, 60% (persistent acute kidney injury at discharge, however, was 28%, and hemodialysis at discharge was 1.6%); major pulmonary complications, 22%; myocardial infarction, 4%; visceral ischemia, 2%; and paraplegia, 0.5%. Median follow-up was 54 months. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 70% at 5 years and 43% at 10 years. Variables associated with poorer survival included congestive heart failure (hazard ratio [HR], 3.5; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.8; P < .002), and increased aneurysm size at presentation (HR, 1.1; P < .013). Persistent stage 3 acute kidney injury was associated with poor long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical repair of proximal abdominal aortic aneurysms can be performed with low mortality. Acute kidney injury is the most frequent complication, but the need for hemodialysis at discharge is low. Long-term survival is favorable. These data should assist in establishing benchmarks for endovascular repair of complex proximal abdominal aortic aneurysms.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
PLoS One ; 18(9): e0291766, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37738272

RESUMEN

Tissue engineering has driven significant research in the strive to create a supply of tissues for patient treatment. Cell integration into engineered tissues maximizes functional capabilities, however, issues of rejection remain. Autologous cell sources able to solve this issue are difficult to identify for tissue engineering purposes. Here, we present the efficacy of patient-sourced cells derived from adipose (adipose-derived stem cells, ASCs) and skin tissue (dermal fibroblasts, PtFibs) to build a combined engineered tunica media and adventitia graft, respectively. Patient cells were integrated into our lab's vascular tissue engineering technique of forming vascular rings that are stacked into a tubular structure to create the vascular graft. For the media layer, ASCs were successfully differentiated into the smooth muscle phenotype using angiotensin II followed by culture in smooth muscle growth factors, evidenced by significantly increased expression of αSMA and myosin light chain kinase. Engineered media vessels composed of differentiated ASCs (ASC-SMCs) exhibited an elastic modulus (45.2 ± 18.9 kPa) between that of vessels of undifferentiated ASCs (71.8 ± 35.3 kPa) and control human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs; 18.7 ± 5.49 kPa) (p<0.5). Tensile strength of vessels composed of ASCs (41.3 ± 15.7 kPa) and ASC-SMCs (37.3 ± 17.0 kPa) were higher compared to vessels of HASMCs (28.4 ± 11.2 kPa). ASC-based tissues exhibited a significant increase in collagen content and fiber maturity- both factors contribute to tissue strength and stability. Furthermore, vessels gained stability and a more-uniform single-tubular shape with longer-term 1-month culture. This work demonstrates efficacy of ASCs and PtFibs to create patient-specific vessels.


Asunto(s)
Adventicia , Túnica Media , Humanos , Aorta , Colágeno , Células Madre
19.
Case Rep Vasc Med ; 2022: 1567581, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36035460

RESUMEN

Raynaud's phenomenon of the tongue after radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy is an exceedingly rare complication. Symptoms are similar to Raynaud's disease of other sites and involve pallor and discomfort on exposure to cold temperatures that resolve with rewarming. Presentation occurs approximately 18-24 months after radiotherapy on average and can usually be managed effectively with lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy. Here, we present a case of lingual Raynaud's following surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy in a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.

20.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 9(1): 128-136, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32353593

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The policies of insurance carriers have used the truncal vein size as a criterion for coverage. The objective of the present study was to compare the effect of great saphenous vein (GSV) size ≥5 mm vs <5 mm on patient presentation and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients in a national cohort were prospectively captured in the Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry. From January 2015 to October 2017, the Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry database was queried for all patients who had undergone varicose vein procedures. The CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification, Venous Clinical Severity Score, and patient-reported outcomes were compared by GSV size (<5 mm, group 1; ≥5 mm, group 2) before and after the procedures. A 2-sample Wilcoxon test was performed to assess the differences between the 2 groups stratified by GSV size. To assess for postoperative improvement, a matched-pairs Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed for each group separately. RESULTS: During the study period, 5757 vein ablation procedures had been performed for GSV: 770 for GSV size <5 mm and 4987 for GSV size ≥5 mm. Patients in group 1 were more likely to be women (81.7% vs 68.4%; P = .001) and older (56.8 vs 55.6 years; P = .012). The CEAP clinical class was more advanced in group 2 than in group 1 (P = .001). The maximal GSV diameter in group 2 was significantly greater than in group 1 (8.32 vs 3.86 mm; P = .001); 64% of group 2 and 59.2% of group 1 had undergone radiofrequency thermal ablation (P = .001). No mortalities occurred in either group. Group 2 had more complications postoperatively (0.6% vs 0%; P = .027), required postoperative anticoagulation (8.8% vs 5%, P = .001), developed partial recanalization (0.8% vs 0.3%; P = .001), and missed more work days (2.32 vs 1.6 days) compared with group 1. A similar rate of hematoma developed in both groups, but group 1 had a higher rate of paresthesia. Both groups had improvement in the Venous Clinical Severity Score and HASTI (heaviness, achiness, swelling, throbbing, itching) score. The degree of symptomatic improvement between the 2 groups was similar. CONCLUSIONS: All patients demonstrated improvement in both clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes after endovenous ablation, regardless of GSV size. Patients with a preoperative GSV size ≥5 mm experienced similar improvement in symptoms but an increased complication rate. Patients with a smaller vein size should not be denied intervention or coverage by vein size.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Vena Safena/cirugía , Várices/cirugía , Insuficiencia Venosa/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Safena/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Várices/diagnóstico por imagen , Várices/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/fisiopatología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA