High-flow nasal oxygen in infants and children for early respiratory management of pneumonia-induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: the CENTURI randomized clinical trial.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of early high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and low-flow oxygen support (LFOS) in children under 5 years with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to severe community-acquired pneumonia in low-middle-income countries. Methods: An open-label randomized clinical trial enrolled children aged 2-59 months with AHRF due to severe community-acquired pneumonia and randomized into HFNC and LFOS. In the LFOS group, the patient received cold wall oxygen humidified by bubbling through sterile water administered through simple nasal prongs at a fixed flow rate of 2 L/min. In the HFNC group, the patient received humidified, heated (37 °C), high-flow oxygen at a flow rate assigned based on weight range, with a titratable oxygen fraction. The primary outcome was treatment failure in 72 h (escalating the respiratory support method using any modality other than primary intervention). Results: Data was analyzed intention-to-treat (HFNC = 124; LFOS = 120). Median (IQR) age was 12 (6-20) and 11 (6-27) months, respectively. Treatment failure occurred in a significantly lower proportion in the HFNC group (7.3%, n = 9/124) as compared to the LFOS group (20%, n = 24/120) (relative risk = 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.75; p = 0.004; adjusted hazard ratio 0.34, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.73; p = 0.006). The intubation rate was significantly lower in the HFNC group (7.3%, n = 9/124 vs. 16.7%, n = 20/120; relative risk = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.92, p = 0.023). There were no significant differences noted in other secondary outcomes. No mortality occurred. Conclusion: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy used as early respiratory support in children under 5 years with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to severe community-acquired pneumonia was associated with significantly lower treatment failure compared with standard low-flow oxygen support. Trial registration: CTRI/2016/04/006788. Registered 01 April 2016, https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/advsearch.php. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-024-00031-8.

Novel TBXAS1 variants in two Indian children with Ghosal hematodiaphyseal dysplasia: A concise report.

Ghosal hematodiaphyseal dysplasia (GHDD) is a rare, autosomal recessive condition characterised by diaphyseal dysplasia of long bones with defective haematopoiesis. We describe 2 such cases with clinical and radiological evidence of GHDD. Molecular analysis revealed novel variants in TBXAS1 gene in both of them. Suspicion and confirmation of this entity is crucial in cases of refractory anemia with bony deformities, as the clinical manifestations in this entity are usually well responsive to corticosteroids.

Clinical Effectiveness of Levetiracetam Compared to Fosphenytoin in the Treatment of Benzodiazepine Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether levetiracetam is an alternative to fosphenytoin to control Benzodiazepine Refractory Status Epilepticus (BRSE) in pediatric population and also to compare the acute drug related side-effects and ventilation requirement among the both arms of anti-epileptic drug therapy. METHODS: All consecutive children admitted with BRSE were randomized to group A, who received fosphenytoin at 20 mg/kg phenytoin equivalents (PE) dose and group B who received levetiracetam at 40 mg/kg over 10 min. Time to terminate seizure (response latency) was measured. If seizure remained refractory after 20 min of test drug administration, appropriate drug escalation was made according to pediatrician's discretion. All primary and secondary outcome measures were compared between the two therapeutic groups. RESULTS: Of 61 children enrolled over 18 mo period, 29 (47.5%) were randomized to group A and 32 (52.5%) were randomized to Group B. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Among 61 children, 58(98%) required Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission and among those 5(8.2%) children required mechanical ventilation. Duration of PICU stay, hospital stay, the response latency and seizure recurrence were compared between both groups. Significant number of children received additional anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in fosphenytoin group [9/29(31%)] compared to levetiracetam group [2/32(7%)] to control seizure. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam may be an effective alternative to fosphenytoin in management of BRSE in children but multicentric trials with large sample size are needed to substantiate this observation.

Psychosocial Needs of Patient's Relatives and Health Care Providers in a Pediatric Critical Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the needs of relatives of children admitted to an Intensive Care Unit and compare their needs with the perspectives of doctors, nurses and administrators. METHODS: This is a descriptive comparative study done at a tertiary care PICU from South India. A modified Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) (internal consistency reliability =0.93) was used to assess the needs of 35 family members, 30 nurses, 30 doctors and 30 administrators. Four needs pertaining to developing countries were included. Their responses were ranked by means and analysed by multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: The responses were significantly different between the groups for 13 needs (28%) and two domain items of proximity and support. Needs of relatives correlated with doctors more strongly than with nurses (rs = 0.80 vs. 0.68; p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the perceived needs of family members and hospital staff for assurance, information and comfort. Both doctors and administrators underestimated the proximity needs but overestimated the support needs of relatives. CONCLUSIONS: The CCFNI with minor modifications can be used in developing countries for assessing the needs of families of children in ICU. Making sure that the relative feels assured about the care given to the child and timely information regarding the child's condition, are the two most important domains from the perspective of family members and hospital staff. Meeting these needs might help family members to cope better and be more supportive to their critically ill child.