RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended for individuals at high risk due to age and smoking history after a shared decision-making conversation. However, little is known about best strategies for incorporating shared decision-making, especially in a busy primary care setting. OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel tool, Lung Cancer Assessment of Risk and Education (LungCARE) to guide LCS decisions among eligible primary care patients. DESIGN: Pilot cluster randomized controlled trial of LungCARE versus usual care. PARTICIPANTS: Patients of providers in a university primary care clinic, who met criteria for LCS. INTERVENTION: Providers were randomized to LungCARE intervention or control. LungCARE participants completed a computer tablet-based video assessment of lung cancer educational needs in the waiting room prior to a primary care visit. Patient and provider both received a summary handout of patient concerns and responses. MAIN MEASURES: All eligible patients completed baseline interviews by telephone. One week after the index visit, participants completed a follow-up telephone survey that assessed patient-physician discussion of LCS, referral to and scheduling of LCS, as well as LCS knowledge and acceptability of LungCARE. Two months after index visit, we reviewed patients' electronic health records (EHRs) for evidence of a shared decision-making conversation and referral to and receipt of LCS. KEY RESULTS: A total of 66 participants completed baseline and follow-up visits (34: LungCARE; 32: usual care). Mean age was 65.9 (± 6.0). Based on EHR review, compared to usual care, LungCARE participants were more likely to have discussed LCS with their physicians (56% vs 25%; p = 0.04) and to be referred to LCS (44% vs 13%; p < 0.02). Intervention participants were also more likely to complete LCS (32% vs 13%; p < 0.01) and had higher knowledge scores (mean score 6.5 (± 1.7) vs 5.5 (± 1.4; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LungCARE increased discussion, referral, and completion of LCS and improved LCS knowledge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03862001.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Anciano , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We examined prostate cancer patients' participation in research and associated factors by race/ethnicity in a multiethnic sample. METHODS: Men with a new diagnosis of prostate cancer were identified through the California Cancer Registry. Patients completed a cross-sectional telephone interview in English, Spanish, Cantonese or Mandarin. Multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by race/ethnicity, estimated the associations of patient demographic and health characteristics with participation in (1) any research, (2) behavioral research, and (3) biological/clinical research. RESULTS: We included 855 prostate cancer patients: African American (19%), Asian American (15%), Latino (24%), and White (42%). In the overall model of participation in any research, African American men (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.54, 95% CI 1.63-3.94), and those with two or more comorbidities (OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.27-3.80) were more likely to report participation. Men 65 years old and older (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.91), those who were married or living with a partner (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98), and those who completed the interview in Spanish (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.85) were less likely to report participating in any research. Stratified analyses identified racial/ethnic-specific sociodemographic characteristics associated with lower research participation, including Spanish or Chinese language, older age, and lower education. CONCLUSION: African American prostate cancer patients reported higher research participation than all other groups. However, recruitment efforts are still needed to overcome barriers to participation for Spanish and Chinese speakers, and barriers among older adults and those with lower education levels.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Participación del Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etnología , Anciano , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Autoinforme , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer or at high risk for breast cancer have supportive care needs. Although cancer centers offer social, psychological, and other support to these patients, these services are not always utilized, and patients continue to report unmet supportive care needs. Reasons for non-utilization of these services have not been well documented. In this analysis, we examine patient reasons for service non-utilization and evaluate patients' interest in receiving information about and paying for other supportive care services. METHODS: Study participants were contacted by email 7-14 months following appointments at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Breast Care Center (BCC) and were invited to complete a 26-question survey about supportive care utilization at UCSF. RESULTS: In total, 195 patients (45%) completed surveys. Of these, 68% had breast cancer. Among patients with breast cancer, fewer than half completed appointments with psychological services. Lack of self-perceived need was the primary reason patients did not pursue psychological services. Overall, 61% of participants were interested in learning more about psychological services, 27% in nutrition counseling, and 20% in exercise counseling. Participants were more interested in individual counseling than in group counseling but were less interested in paying for services. CONCLUSION: Patients often feel that they do not need supportive services. Breast cancer patients are interested in learning more about psychological services, exercise counseling, and nutrition counseling. Although many cancer centers offer group coaching and counseling sessions on these topics, patients may be more willing to engage in individual counseling.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Recursos en Salud/normas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Necesidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/psicología , Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Consejo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Apoyo Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Regular mammogram screening for eligible average risk women has been associated with early detection and reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality. Delayed follow-up and resolution of abnormal mammograms limit early detection efforts and can cause psychological distress and anxiety. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to gain insight from women's narratives into how organizational factors related to communication and coordination of care facilitate or hinder timely follow-up for abnormal mammogram results. DESIGN: We conducted 61 qualitative in-person interviews with women from four race-ethnic groups (African American, Chinese, Latina, and White) in three different healthcare settings (academic, community, and safety-net). PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants had an abnormal mammogram result requiring breast biopsy documented in the San Francisco Mammography Registry in the previous year. APPROACH: Interview narratives included reflections on experience and suggested improvements to communication and follow-up processes. A grounded theory approach was used to identify themes across interviews. KEY RESULTS: Participants' experiences of follow-up and diagnosis depended largely on communication processes. Twenty-one participants experienced a follow-up delay (> 30 days between index mammogram and biopsy). Organizational factors, which varied across different institutions, played key roles in effective communication which included (a) direct verbal communication with the ability to ask questions, (b) explanation of medical processes and terminology avoiding jargon, and (c) use of interpretation services for women with limited English proficiency. CONCLUSION: Health organizations varied in their processes for abnormal results communication and availability of support staff and interpretation services. Women who received care from institutions with more robust support staff, such as bilingual navigators, more often than not reported understanding their results and timely abnormal mammogram follow-up. These reports were consistent across women from diverse ethnic groups and suggest the value of organizational support services between an abnormal mammogram and resolution for improving follow-up times and minimizing patient distress.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Población Blanca , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Comunicación , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Mamografía , San FranciscoRESUMEN
The after-visit summary (AVS), a document generated from the electronic health record that summarizes patients' encounters with the healthcare system, is a widely used communication tool. Its use by and usefulness for populations with limited English proficiency (LEP) and limited health literacy (LHL) is poorly understood. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed use and usefulness of the AVS among English-, Spanish-, Cantonese-, or Mandarin-speaking Latinx and Chinese primary-care patients. Outcome measures were self-reported AVS use (did not use/looked-at only/shared only/looked-at and shared) and usefulness (useful/not useful). Among 993 participants, 57% were ≥65 years old, 61% had LEP, 21% had LHL, 30.2% were Latinx, 69.8% were Chinese. The majority used the AVS (86%) and found it useful (65%). In adjusted models, participants with LEP were more likely to "look at" (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.07-2.62) and "look at and share" (OR 1.65, 1.02-2.66) the AVS, but less likely to find it useful (OR 0.68, 0.47-0.98) compared to English speakers. Those with LHL were less likely to "look at" (OR 0.60, 0.39-0.93) and less likely to find the AVS useful (OR 0.67, 0.46-0.99) compared to those with adequate health literacy. Our results emphasize the need for easy-to-understand and fully language-concordant AVS.
Asunto(s)
Asiático/psicología , Comunicación en Salud/métodos , Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Lenguaje , Satisfacción del Paciente/etnología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread implementation of mammographic breast density (MBD) notification laws, the impact of these laws on knowledge of MBD and knowledge of breast cancer risk is limited by the lack of tools to promote informed decision-making in practice. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate whether brief, personalized informational videos following a normal mammogram in addition to a legislatively required letter about MBD result can improve knowledge of MBD and breast cancer risk compared to standard care (i.e., legislatively required letter about MBD included with the mammogram result). DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: Prospective randomized controlled trial of English-speaking women, age 40-74 years, without prior history of breast cancer, receiving a screening mammogram with a normal or benign finding (intervention group n = 235, control group n = 224). INTERVENTION: brief (3-5 min) video, personalized to a woman's MBD result and breast cancer risk. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes were a woman's knowledge of her MBD and risk of breast cancer. Secondary outcomes included whether a woman reported that she discussed the results of her mammogram with her primary care provider (PCP). KEY RESULTS: Relative to women in the control arm, women in the intervention arm had greater improvement in their knowledge of both their personal MBD (intervention pre/post 39.2%/ 77.5%; control pre/post 36.2%/ 37.5%; odds ratio (OR) 5.34 for change for intervention vs. control, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.87-7.36; p < 0.001) and risk of breast cancer (intervention pre/post: 66.8%/74.0%; control pre/post 67.9%/ 65.2%; OR 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.84; p = 0.01). Women in the intervention group were more likely than those in the control group to report discussing the results of their mammogram with their PCP (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Brief, personalized videos following mammography can improve knowledge of MBD and personal risk of breast cancer compared to a legislatively mandated informational letter. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02986360).
Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
Identification of mutations that increase lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer is critical to improving women's health. Because these mutations are relatively rare in the general population, there is a need for efficient methods to identify appropriate women to undergo genetic testing. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility, accuracy, and performance of the NCCN guideline-based Tool for Risk Assessment for breast and ovarian Cancer (N-TRAC)-a patient-facing assessment for those affected and unaffected by cancer. This study enrolled a prospective cohort of 100 affected and 100 unaffected women that used N-TRAC in a clinical setting. Recommendations for referral to genetic counseling based on N-TRAC and other standard risk assessment methods were compared.Seventy-seven of the 100 affected women and 35 of the 100 unaffected women were identified as high risk by N-TRAC. The average completion time was approximately 2 min for both groups. N-TRAC accuracy for family history was exceptional in both groups (kappa > 0.96). N-TRAC and other risk assessment methods do not always identify the same high risk population. N-TRAC is an accurate and feasible tool that can assist in identifying women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and may lead to more informed decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Guías como Asunto , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Physicians in Argentina smoke at rates similar to the general population, and do not have a clear role in tobacco control strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the attitudes and knowledge of medical students and recent graduates towards smoking behavior in Argentina. DESIGN: Cross-sectional self-administered online survey conducted in 2011. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students and recent medical graduates from the University of Buenos Aires. MAIN MEASURES: Attitudes and knowledge were evaluated by responses to 16 statements regarding the effects of smoking cigarettes and the role of physicians in tobacco control. Rates of agreement with a full ban on indoor smoking in different public settings were assessed. KEY RESULTS: The sample included 1659 participants (response rate: 35.1 %), 453 of whom (27.3 %) were current smokers. Only 52 % of participants agreed that doctors should set an example for their patients by not smoking, 30.9 % thought that medical advice had little effect on patients' cessation behavior, and 19.4 % believed that physicians could decline to care for smoking patients who failed to quit. In adjusted logistic regression models, current smokers had less supportive attitudes about tobacco control and were less likely than non-smokers to agree with a full indoor smoking ban in hospitals (OR: 0.30; 95 % CI 0.16-0.58), universities (OR: 0.55; 95 % CI 0.41-0.73), workplaces (OR: 0.67; 95 % CI 0.50-0.88), restaurants (OR: 0.42; 95 % CI 0.33-0.53), cafes (OR: 0.41; 95 % CI 0.33-0.51), nightclubs (OR: 0.32; 95 % CI 0.25-0.40), and bars (0.35; 95 % CI 0.28-0.45). Recent medical graduates had more accurate knowledge about cessation and were more likely to agree with a full smoking ban in recreational venues. CONCLUSIONS: Although most participants reported a strong anti-tobacco attitude, a proportion still failed to recognize the importance of their role as physicians in tobacco control strategies. Current smokers and current students were less likely to support indoor smoking bans. Specific educational curricula could address these factors.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Médicos/psicología , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Argentina/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fumar/terapia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of factors reflecting appreciation of Indigenous culture and racial insults on alcohol and drug use initiation among multi-ethnic youth in Jujuy, Argentina. METHODS: Students were surveyed from 27 secondary schools that were randomly selected to represent the province. A total of 3040 eligible students in 10th grade, age 14 to 18years were surveyed in 2006 and 2660 of these same students completed surveys in 11th grade in 2007. Multivariate logistic regression models assessed the effect of appreciation for Indigenous cultures and reported exposure to racial insults in 10th grade on incident current alcohol drinking in previous 30days, binge drinking (≥5 drinks at one sitting), and lifetime drug use (marijuana, inhalants or cocaine) in 11th grade among students not reporting these behaviors in 2006. RESULTS: In 2006, 63% of respondents reported high appreciation for Indigenous cultures and 39% had ever experienced racial insults. In 2007, incident current drinking was 24.4%, binge drinking 14.8%, and any drug use initiation was 4.1%. Exposure to racial insults increased the likelihood of binge drinking (OR=1.6; 95% CI 1.2-2.1) but was not significant for any drug use. Appreciation for Indigenous cultures reduced the risk of any drug use initiation (OR=0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.7) but had no effect for alcohol drinking outcomes. These effects were independent of Indigenous ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing appreciation for Indigenous cultures and decreasing racial insults are achievable goals that can be incorporated into programs to prevent youth substance use.
Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente/psicología , Indígenas Sudamericanos/psicología , Racismo/psicología , Identificación Social , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etnología , Adolescente , Argentina/epidemiología , Cultura , Femenino , Humanos , Indígenas Sudamericanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Factores Protectores , Factores de Riesgo , Instituciones Académicas , Clase Social , Estudiantes/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated an intervention to teach physicians how to help their smoking patients quit compared to usual care in Argentina. METHODS: Physicians were recruited from six clinical systems and randomized to intervention (didactic curriculum in two 3-hour sessions) or usual care. Smoking patients who saw participating physicians within 30 days of the intervention (index clinical visit) were randomly sampled and interviewed by telephone with follow-up surveys at months 6 and 12 after the index clinical visit. Outcomes were tobacco abstinence (main), quit attempt in the past month, use of medications to quit smoking, and cigarettes per day. Repeated measures on the same participants were accommodated via generalized linear mixed models. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-four physicians were randomized; average age 44.5 years, 53% women and 12% smoked. Of 1378 smoking patients surveyed, 81% were women and 45% had more than 12 years of education. At 1 month, most patients (77%) reported daily smoking, 20% smoked some days and 3% had quit. Mean cigarettes smoked per day was 12.9 (SD = 8.8) and 49% were ready to quit within the year. Intention-to-treat analyses did not show significant group differences in quit rates at 12 months when assuming outcome response was missing at random (23% vs. 24.1%, P = .435). Using missing=smoking imputation rule, quit rates were not different at 12 months (15.6% vs. 16.4% P = .729). Motivated smokers were more likely to quit at 6 months (17.7% vs. 9.6%, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Training in tobacco cessation for physicians did not improve abstinence among their unselected smoking patients.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica Continua/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Adulto , Argentina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Internet-based marketing has become an attractive option for promoting tobacco products due to its potential to avoid advertising restrictions. In Argentina, several cigarette brands have designed websites for the local market, which promote user participation. OBJECTIVE: The intent of the study was to report on the use of tobacco company-sponsored websites by medical students and recently graduated physicians. METHODS: An online self-administered survey was conducted among eligible medical students and recent graduates from the University of Buenos Aires (UBA). Sampling was from lists of email addresses of students enrolled in two required courses. Eligibility criteria were ages 18-30 years and reporting on smoking status. Questions on Internet use included accessing a tobacco brand website at least once during their lifetime and any use of tobacco promotional materials. RESULTS: The response rate was 35.08% (1743/4969). The final sample included 1659 participants: 73.06% (1212/1659) were women and mean age was 26.6 years (SD 1.9). The majority were current medical students (55.70%, 924/1659) and 27.31% (453/1659) were current smokers. Men were more likely to report having seen a tobacco advertisement on the Internet (P=.001), to have received a tobacco promotion personally addressed to them (P=.03), to have used that promotion (P=.02), and to have accessed a tobacco-sponsored website (P=.01). Among respondents, 19.35% (321/1659) reported having accessed a tobacco-sponsored website at least once in their lifetime and almost all of them (93.8%, 301/321) accessed these sites only when it was necessary for participating in a marketing promotion. Most people logging on for promotions reported entering once a month or less (58.9%, 189/321), while 25.5% (82/321) reported accessing the tobacco industry Internet sites once a week or more. In adjusted logistic regression models, participants were more likely to have accessed a tobacco brand website if they were former smokers (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.42-4.22) or current (OR 8.12, 95% CI 4.66-14.16), if they reported having seen a tobacco advertisement on the Internet (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.77-3.37), received a tobacco promotion personally addressed to them (OR 5.62; 95% CI 4.19-7.55), or used one of these promotions (OR 14.05, 95% CI 9.21-21.43). Respondents were more likely to be current smokers if they received a tobacco promotion (OR 2.64, 95% CI 2.02-3.45) or if they used one of these promotions (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.31-2.85). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that tobacco industry websites reach medical students and young physicians in a middle-income country with their marketing promotions. Current or proposed legislation to ban tobacco advertising needs to include Internet sites and related social media.
Asunto(s)
Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Mercadotecnía , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/epidemiología , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Industria del Tabaco , Adulto , Argentina/epidemiología , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As the U.S. population ages, family members increasingly act as informal caregivers, particularly for minority patients and those with limited English proficiency (LEP). However, physicians often do not identify or engage caregivers until there is a health crisis. This study aims to further our understanding of characteristics associated with having a caregiver present at a primary care visit, and better understand the specific roles family caregivers engage in to support older Chinese and Latino primary care patients. METHODS: Primary care patients were surveyed by telephone in a study of language access and communication. Participants included Chinese and Latino primary care patients (≥ 65 years old) from an academic general medicine practice. We asked patients if anyone was in the room with them during their most recent primary care visit (yes = caregiver accompanied). We asked about caregiving support for various needs, and examined associations of patient and visit characteristics with being accompanied, and frequency of caregiver support roles overall and by caregiver accompaniment. RESULTS: Among 906 participants, 80% preferred a non-English language, 64% were women, 88% had Medicare, and mean age was 76 years (range 65-97). 43% were accompanied to their most recent visit. Speaking English 'not at all' vs. 'very well' was associated with being caregiver accompanied (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.3-9.7), as was older age ≥ 75 vs. 65-74 (OR 2.7; 95% CI 2.0-3.7). The most common roles being supported by caregivers included: transportation to medical appointments (63%), helping with medical decisions (60%), and talking with the doctor about the patient's medical care (54%). Even among unaccompanied patients, substantial proportions reported caregiver support with medical decisions (45%), talking with the doctor (33%), and medical needs at home (26%). CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities for physicians to engage caregivers who have active support roles may be missed, especially if those caregivers are not present at the visit. Future interventions should aim to help physicians identify which patients have caregivers and for what needs, so they may effectively engage caregivers before a health crisis occurs.
Asunto(s)
Asiático , Cuidadores , Hispánicos o Latinos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Edad , Asiático/psicología , Cuidadores/psicología , Barreras de Comunicación , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Dominio Limitado del Inglés , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patient participation in cancer clinical trials is imperative to the advancement of medical science. Physicians play an important role in recruitment by discussing clinical trials with their cancer patients. Patient-physician discussion is influenced by many factors relating to the physician, the patient, and the healthcare system. METHODS: Physicians selected from the 2008-2009 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile who practiced in California, Florida, Illinois, or New York and specialized in medical oncology, surgery, or radiation oncology were surveyed about their attitudes and practices with respect to breast cancer clinical trials. Practice types were categorized according to the classifications provided by the American College of Surgeons, and clinical trial and practice addresses were geocoded. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 706 of 1,534 eligible physicians (46 %). Medical oncologists were more likely than surgical or radiation oncologists to discuss the possibility, benefits, and risks of clinical trial enrollment with their breast cancer patients. Physicians who spent the most time in patient care were least likely to discuss clinical trials with their patients. Distance from a physician's practice to the nearest clinical trial site was inversely associated with referral and recruitment. Perceived barriers to clinical trial participation were associated with greater referral activity suggesting that physicians who were more involved in trials were also more likely to understand barriers to participation. CONCLUSIONS: Multilevel interventions may be successful at increasing participation of women in clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Neoplasias/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about factors associated with willingness to undergo colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for personal or public health benefit among women from diverse race/ethnic groups. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with willingness to undergo CRC screening for personal and public health benefit among women from diverse race/ethnic groups. METHODS: We interviewed women aged 50 to 80 from four racial/ethnic groups from primary care clinics in 2003-2005. We asked about demographics, CRC screening knowledge and history, perceived risk of colon cancer, and about the outcomes of intention to be screened for personal benefit and for public health benefit. RESULTS: Of the 492 women who completed the interview, 32 % were White, 16 % were African American, 21 % were Latina and 32 % were Asian. Up-to-date screening was reported by 77 % of women, with similar numbers obtaining fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within 2 years or colonoscopy within 10 years. The majority of women were "likely or very likely" to get FOBT or colonoscopy after learning the benefits and risks. Multivariate models showed that compared to Whites, fewer Asians would undergo colonoscopy (OR = 0.28; 95 % CI: 0.12, 0.63), while more Latinas would undergo colonoscopy (OR = 6.14; 95 % CI: 1.77, 21.34) and obtain regular CRC screening (OR = 4.47; 95 % CI: 1.66, 12.04). The majority would obtain CRC screening even if they would not personally benefit; those who perceived themselves to be at higher than average cancer risk were more likely to participate in CRC screening for public health benefit (OR = 2.32; 95 % CI: 1.32, 4.09). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women are willing to undergo screening for personal benefit. Asians were less likely, and Latinas more likely, to accept colonoscopy. Most are also willing to undergo screening for public health benefit. Self-perceived risk of CRC was the most consistent predictor of willingness and intention to be screened for either personal or public health benefit.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asiático/psicología , California , Colonoscopía/psicología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etnología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Pública , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Población Blanca/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for psychosocial distress following a breast cancer diagnosis include younger age, history of depression, inadequate social support, and serious comorbid conditions. Although these quality of life (QOL) concerns have been studied in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), Latina women have been understudied. METHODS: Data were from a cross-sectional telephone survey of Latina and Euro-American women with DCIS recruited through a population-based cancer registry. The sample included 396 Euro-American women and 349 Latina women; 156 were interviewed in English and 193 in Spanish, with a median of 2 years after diagnosis. Regression models were created for measures in each of the following four QOL domains: physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. RESULTS: Younger age, no partner, and lower income were related to lower QOL in various domains. Physical comorbidities were associated with lower physical, psychological, and social QOL; lingering effects of surgery and prior depression were associated with lower QOL in all domains. English-speaking and Spanish-speaking Latinas (SSLs) reported higher spiritual QOL, and SSLs reported lower social QOL than Euro-American women. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having lower mortality, women with DCIS are treated with surgery and radiation therapy as if they have invasive cancer, and the aftereffects of treatment can impact their QOL. SSLs are at risk for lower QOL partly because of poverty. However, Latinas' greater spiritual QOL may mitigate some of the psychological and social effects of treatment. IMPLICATIONS: It is important to incorporate these findings into treatment decision making (choice of surgical treatment) and survivorship care (monitoring women with a history of depression or physical comorbidity).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Población Blanca/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/complicaciones , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/etnología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Psicológicas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate effect of gender role attitudes on tobacco and alcohol use among Argentinean girls. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey of 10th grade students attending 27 randomly selected schools in Jujuy, Argentina. Questions about tobacco and alcohol use were adapted from global youth surveys. Five items with 5-point response options of agreement-disagreement assessed attitude towards egalitarian (higher score) gender roles. RESULTS: 2133 girls, aged 13-18 years, 71% Indigenous, 22% mixed Indigenous/European, and 7% European responded. Of these, 60% had ever smoked, 32% were current smokers, 58% ever drinkers, 27% drank in previous month, and 13% had ≥5 drinks on one occasion. Mean response to the gender role scale was 3.49 (95% Confidence Intervals = 3.41-3.57) out of 5 tending toward egalitarian attitudes. Logistic regression models using the gender role scale score as the main predictor and adjusting for demographic and social confounders showed that egalitarian gender role was associated with ever smoking (Odds Ratio = 1.25; 95% Confidence Intervals 1.09-1.44), ever drinking (Odds Ratio = 1.24; 95% Confidence Intervals 1.10-1.40), drinking in prior month (Odds Ratio = 1.21; 95% Confidence Intervals 1.07-1.37) and ≥5 drinks on one occasion (Odds Ratio = 1.15; 95% Confidence Intervals 1.00-1.33), but was not significant for current smoking. CONCLUSION: Girls in Jujuy who reported more egalitarian gender role attitudes had higher odds of smoking or drinking.
Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Actitud , Identidad de Género , Fumar/epidemiología , Adolescente , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/psicología , Argentina , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Autoinforme , Fumar/psicología , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that cervical cancer screening end in average-risk patients with a cervix at 65 years of age if adequate screening measures have been met, defined as having 1) at least three normal consecutive cytology (Pap) tests, or 2) two normal cytology tests and/or two negative high-risk human papillomavirus tests between ages 55-65; the last test should be performed within the prior 5 years. Up to 60 % of all women aged 65 years and older who are ending screening do not meet the criteria for adequate screening. The objective of this study was to understand the process and approach that healthcare clinicians use to determine eligibility to end cervical cancer screening. In 2021 we conducted semi-structured interviews in San Francisco, CA with twelve healthcare clinicians: two family medicine physicians, three general internal medicine physicians, two obstetrician/gynecologists and five nurse practitioners. Thematic analysis, using inductive and deductive coding, was utilized. Three major themes emerged: following guidelines, relying on self-reported data regarding prior screening, and considering sexual activity as a factor in the decision to end screening. All interviewees endorsed following the USPSTF guidelines and they utilized self-report to determine eligibility to end screening. Clinicians' approach was dependent in part on their judgement about the reliability of the patient to convey their screening history. Sexual activity of the patient was considered when making clinical recommendations. Shared decision-making was often utilized. Clinicians voiced a strong reliance on self-reported screening history to end cervical cancer screening.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anxiety and emotional distress have not been studied in large, diverse samples of patients with pulmonary nodules. RESEARCH QUESTION: How common are anxiety and distress in patients with newly identified pulmonary nodules, and what factors are associated with these outcomes? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study surveyed participants in the Watch the Spot Trial, a large, pragmatic clinical trial of more vs less intensive strategies for radiographic surveillance of patients with small pulmonary nodules. The survey included validated instruments to measure patient-centered outcomes such as nodule-related emotional distress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised) and anxiety (Six-Item State Anxiety Inventory) 6 to 8 weeks following nodule identification. Mixed-effects models were used to compare outcomes between study arms following adjustment for potential confounders and clustering within enrollment site, while also examining a limited number of prespecified explanatory factors, including nodule size, mode of detection, type of ordering clinician, and lack of timely notification prior to contact by the study team. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 34,699 patients; 2,049 individuals completed the baseline survey (5.9%). Respondents and nonrespondents had similar demographic and nodule characteristics, although more respondents were non-Hispanic and White. Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores indicated mild, moderate, or severe distress in 32.2%, 9.4%, and 7.2% of respondents, respectively, with no difference in scores between study arms. Following adjustment, greater emotional distress was associated with larger nodule size and lack of timely notification by a clinician; distress was also associated with younger age, female sex, ever smoking, Black race, and Hispanic ethnicity. Anxiety was associated with lack of timely notification, ever smoking, and female sex. INTERPRETATION: Almost one-half of respondents experienced emotional distress 6 to 8 weeks following pulmonary nodule identification. Strategies are needed to mitigate the burden of distress, especially in younger, female, ever smoking, and minoritized patients, and those with larger nodules. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02623712; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples , Distrés Psicológico , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estado de SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Exposure to racial insults among youth in Jujuy, Argentina, was examined as a factor associated with smoking behavior. METHODS: Youth sampled from eighth-grade classes in 27 randomly selected middle schools completed annual surveys in the ninth and tenth grades. Demographics, race/ethnicity (Indigenous/Amazonian, Indigenous/Andean, Indigenous unspecified group, Mixed European-Indigenous, European), cigarette smoking, and other attitudinal and behavioral factors were measured. Exposure to racial insults, measured in the ninth grade, was modeled to predict cigarette smoking in the previous 30 days (defined as current) in the tenth grade conditional on ninth grade smoking. RESULTS: Of the 3,122 respondents, 35.5% reported exposure to racial insults and 33.8% were current smokers. Factors associated with racial insults were being male, indigenous language spoken at home, ever and current smoking, smoking in a ceremonial context, exposure to second-hand smoke at home, number of friends who smoke, having low expectations for the future, low identification with conforming role models, high identification with defiant role models, and depressive symptoms. Reported exposure to racial insults increased the risk of current smoking in the 10th grade among Indigenous Amazonian respondents (OR = 3.8; 95% CI 1.4-10.4) and among the Indigenous-unspecified group (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-2.8), but not among European or Indigenous Andean youth. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to racial insults is commonplace among youth in Jujuy. Evidence of a longitudinal effect of ninth-grade racial insults on tenth-grade smoking rates provides support for an association of racial insults with smoking behavior.