RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) improves quality of life (QoL), motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS). However, in previous studies, 43%-49% of patients did not experience clinically relevant postoperative QoL improvement. To inform individualised prediction of postoperative QoL improvement, we developed a stratification analysis of QoL outcomes based on preoperative non-motor total burden, severity of motor progression and motor response in levodopa challenge tests. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, international study with a 6-month follow-up. A distribution-based threshold identified 'QoL responders' in the PDQuestionnaire-8 Summary Index (PDQ-8 SI). After baseline stratification based on the NMS Scale, Hoehn and Yahr Scale and levodopa response assessed with the Unified PD Rating Scale-III, we compared postoperative QoL response between these strata. To assess the clinical usefulness and statistical feasibility of stratifications, we compared cumulative distribution function curves, respectively PDQ-8 within-stratum variation. RESULTS: All main outcomes improved postoperatively. Based on the 8.1 points threshold for clinically meaningful PDQ-8 SI improvement, only 80/161 patients were classified as 'QoL responders'. The absolute risk reductions for QoL non-response among respective non-motor, motor progression and levodopa response strata were 23%, 8% and 3%, respectively. Only non-motor stratification reduced PDQ-8 within-stratum variation compared with the overall cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Non-motor stratification, but not motor progression or levodopa response stratification, is clinically useful and statistically feasible for personalised preoperative prediction of postoperative QoL outcome of STN-DBS for PD. Our findings highlight that non-motor assessments are necessary components of a case-based, holistic approach of DBS indication evaluations geared towards optimising postoperative QoL outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: GermanClinicalTrialsRegister: #6735.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Calidad de Vida , Núcleo Subtalámico , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term, real-life effects on non-motor symptoms (NMS) of opicapone compared to entacapone in levodopa-treated people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). METHODS: A retrospective data analysis, with pre- and post-opicapone initiation data of 17 PwP with motor fluctuations compared to a comparable group of 18 PwP introduced on entacapone. The primary outcome was changes in the NMS Scale (NMSS) total score after 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in the NMSS domains, and Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) total and item scores after the same time span. RESULTS: Groups were comparable for baseline demographics and Parkinson's-related features (p ≥ 0.314) as well as duration of follow-up (1.33 ± 0.66 years for PwP on opicapone and 1.23 ± 0.49 years for those on entacapone; p = 0.858). PwP who were introduced on opicapone showed no changes in NMSS and PDSS total scores after 1 year (p = 0.605 and p = 0.507, respectively), whereas PwP who were introduced on entacapone showed significant worsening of NMSS and PDSS total scores at follow-up (p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively). In neither group changes in individual NMSS domains from baseline to follow-up were observed (p ≥ 0.288 for entacapone and p ≥ 0.816 for opicapone, respectively). In PwP on entacapone significant worsening was seen in the distressing dreams, hallucinations, and limb numbness items of the PDSS (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of opicapone in real-life PwP with motor fluctuations seems to stabilise NMS burden and aspects of sleep dysfunction, in contrast to entacapone where there was a worsening of NMS burden and PDSS scores over 1 year follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Levodopa , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Catecol O-Metiltransferasa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores de Catecol O-Metiltransferasa/farmacología , Inhibidores de Catecol O-Metiltransferasa/uso terapéutico , NitrilosRESUMEN
Levodopa is the gold standard for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). There are well documented motor and non-motor fluctuations, however, that occur almost inevitably once levodopa is started after a variable period in people with PD. Whilst brain neurodegenerative processes play a part in the pathogenesis of these fluctuations, a range of barriers across the gastrointestinal (GI) tract can alter levodopa pharmacokinetics, ultimately contributing to non-optimal levodopa response and symptoms fluctuations. GI barriers to levodopa transport and absorption include dysphagia, delayed gastric emptying, constipation, Helicobacter pylori infection, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and gut dysbiosis. In addition, a protein-rich diet and concomitant medication intake can further alter levodopa pharmacokinetics. This can result in unpredictable or sub-optimal levodopa response, 'delayed on' or 'no on' phenomena. In this narrative review, we provided an overview on the plethora of GI obstacles to levodopa transport and absorption in PD and their implications on levodopa pharmacokinetics and development of motor fluctuations. In addition, management strategies to address GI dysfunction in PD are highlighted, including use of non-oral therapies to bypass the GI tract.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Tracto GastrointestinalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Twenty-four-hour treatment options could provide a continuous drug delivery strategy in advanced Parkinson's disease and can ameliorate motor and non-motor complications. Use of levodopa infusion is often limited to 12-16 h/day due to its cost. Adjunctive overnight rotigotine transdermal patch is a continuous drug delivery option successfully used in clinical practice coupled with apomorphine infusion. However, real-life data addressing the tolerability of transdermal dopamine agonist therapy with concomitant use of intrajejunal levodopa infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease are not available. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerability and beneficial effects of combined therapy with overnight rotigotine transdermal patch and intrajejunal levodopa infusion over a follow-up period of 12 months in advanced Parkinson's disease. METHOD: In this retrospective data analysis, data before and after the initiation of the continuous drug delivery combined therapy using overnight rotigotine transdermal patch and intrajejunal levodopa infusion were collected from the ongoing non-motor-international-longitudinal study (NILS) and local clinical practice at King's College Hospital (London, United Kingdom). 12 advanced Parkinson's disease patients on intrajejunal levodopa therapy who were additionally treated with overnight rotigotine transdermal patch (mean dose 5.67 ± 4.19 mg) are included. Tolerability over a 12-month period was assessed. In addition, changes in motor symptoms (SCales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease, SCOPA-Motor), non-motor symptoms (Non-Motor Symptoms Scale, NMSS) and quality of life (Parkinson's disease Questionnaire-8, PDQ-8) before and 12-month after continuous drug delivery combined therapy initiation are evaluated. RESULTS: Tolerability was 100% irrespective of age, disease duration, stages of disease. (Treatment with overnight rotigotine transdermal patch that was maintained for a minimum of 6 months was considered "tolerated", primary tolerability). In addition, we noted a significant reduction of the NMSS total score (p = 0.009) and the NMSS domain 3 score (mood and apathy domain) (p = 0.028), although the latter did not remain statistically significant after correction for multiple testing (p2 = 0.252) at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Combination of intrajejunal levodopa infusion with overnight rotigotine transdermal patch is well tolerated and extend the beneficial effects of infusion with excellent tolerability; and also improved aspects of mood and apathy sustained at 12 months in advanced Parkinson's disease.
Asunto(s)
Levodopa , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Administración Cutánea , Agonistas de Dopamina/farmacología , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Estudios Longitudinales , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tetrahidronaftalenos , Tiofenos , Parche TransdérmicoRESUMEN
Parkinsonism secondary to viral infections is not an uncommon occurrence and has been brought under the spotlight with the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. A variety of viruses have been described with a potential of inducing or contributing to the occurrence of parkinsonism and Parkinson's disease (PD), although the relationship between the two remains a matter of debate originating with the description of encephalitis lethargica in the aftermath of the Spanish flu in 1918. While some viral infections have been linked to an increased risk for the development of PD, others seem to have a causal link with the occurrence of parkinsonism. Here, we review the currently available evidence on viral-induced parkinsonism with a focus on potential pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical features. We also review the evidence on viral infections as a risk factor for developing PD and the link between SARS-CoV-2 and parkinsonism, which might have important implications for future research and treatments.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Pandémica, 1918-1919 , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Trastornos Parkinsonianos , Virosis , Virus , COVID-19/complicaciones , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/etiología , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
There is increasing evidence highlighting the potential role of the gut-brain axis in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and on the use of probiotics as a therapeutic strategy for this neurodegenerative disorder. While several studies have been published on the topic in recent years, there is still a lack of a comprehensive understanding of the effects of probiotics in PD and their possible underlying mechanisms. Through this systematic review, we collected a total of 17 articles, consisting of preclinical and clinical models of PD investigating the effect of probiotics on (1) energy metabolism, (2) inflammation and oxidative stress, (3) neurodegeneration, as well as (4) motor and (5) non-motor function. Articles were obtained from PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase databases. Findings from preclinical studies suggest that treatment with probiotics increases glucose metabolism (increased secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1), reduces peripheral and central inflammation (reduced interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)), reduces peripheral and central oxidative stress (reduced peripheral superoxide anion levels and increased central antioxidant glutathione levels), decreases neurodegeneration (increased numbers of tyrosine hydroxylase dopaminergic neurons and levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor), increases motor function (increased motor agility) and non-motor function (decreased memory deficits). Similarly, findings from clinical studies suggest that probiotics increase glucose metabolism (reduced insulin resistance), reduce peripheral inflammation (reduced peripheral TNF-α expression and C-reactive protein levels), and increase motor and non-motor function (decreased overall PD symptomatology and constipation); however, findings on oxidative stress were inconclusive across studies. Overall, this review is the first one to systematically report evidence for the putative beneficial effects of probiotics on molecular and cellular mechanisms, as well as behavioural phenotypes, in either preclinical or clinical studies in PD. However, additional and more robust studies are still needed to confirm these outcomes, and should aim to focus more on bench-to-bedside approaches, in order to address the existing gaps between preclinical and clinical findings in this field.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Probióticos , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Eje Cerebro-Intestino , Neuronas Dopaminérgicas , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Probióticos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a common and disabling non-motor symptom (NMS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. However, the effect of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on fatigue has not been widely studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of STN DBS on fatigue in PD patients, measured by the Non-motor symptoms scale (NMSS). METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of 50 patients with PD who underwent STN DBS at King's College Hospital and Salford Royal Hospital with fatigue scores (measured by question number 4 from domain 2 (sleep/fatigue) of the NMSS as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included the PD Sleep Scale (PDSS), Scales for Outcome in PD (SCOPA)-motor examination, activities of daily living, motor complications, Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stage and changes in Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD). RESULTS: 50 patients with a mean follow-up period of 1.98 ± 1.36 years were studied. Significant improvement in median fatigue scores (4.00 (0.75-9.00) to 1.00 (0.00-4.50); p = .001) was observed. In addition, improvements in question 5 (sleep maintenance and fragmentation; 8.00 (4.00-12.00) to 0.00 (0.00-4.00); p < .001) and in domain 2 total score (sleep/fatigue; 20.00 (8.75-27.25) to 6.00 (0.75-16.00); p < .001) were also significant, together with improvements in NMSS total score, SCOPA scores and HY stage (p ≤ .02). Moreover, LEDD but especially dopamine agonists LEDD was significantly reduced after DBS (310.00 (0.00-480.00) to 150.00 (0.00-300.00); p < .020). CONCLUSIONS: Even though open label and not using a validated fatigue scale, this observational analysis suggest that fatigue improves significantly after STN DBS with persisting benefits at two years follow-up.
RESUMEN
Sialorrhoea in Parkinson's disease (PD) is an often neglected yet key non-motor symptom with impact on patient quality of life. However, previous studies have shown a broad range of prevalence figures. To assess prevalence of drooling in PD and its relationship to quality of life, we performed a retrospective analysis of 728 consecutive PD patients who had a baseline and follow-up assessment as part of the Non-motor International Longitudinal Study (NILS), and for whom drooling presence and severity were available, assessed through the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS). In addition, we analysed the prevalence of associated dysphagia through self-reported outcomes. Quality of life was assessed through the PDQ-8 scale. Baseline (disease duration 5.6 years) prevalence of drooling was 37.2% (score ≥ 1 NMSS question 19), and after 3.27 ± 1.74 years follow-up, this was 40.1% (p = 0.17). The prevalence of drooling increased with age (p < 0.001). The severity of drooling, however, did not change (p = 0.12). While in 456 patients without drooling at baseline, only 16% (n = 73) had dysphagia (question 20 of the NMSS), in those with drooling this was 34.3% (p < 0.001). At follow-up, the number of patients with dysphagia had increased, 20.4% with no drooling had dysphagia, and 43.6% with drooling had dysphagia. Both at baseline and follow-up, drooling severity was significantly positively associated with quality of life (PDQ-8; r = 0.199; p < 0.001). In moderately advanced PD patients, subjective drooling occurs in over one-third of patients and was significantly associated with decreased quality of life. Dysphagia occurred significantly more often in patients with drooling.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Sialorrea , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sialorrea/epidemiología , Sialorrea/etiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we discuss the most recent evidence on mechanisms underlying pathological nociceptive processing in Parkinson's disease patients, as well as novel treatment strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: In Parkinson's disease, specific neurodegenerative changes may cause alterations in nociceptive processing at multiple levels. Optimization of dopaminergic therapies should always be the first step in the management of Parkinson's disease pain. Reportedly, rotigotine transdermal patch, a monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor safinamide (as an add-on therapy to levodopa), subcutaneous apomorphine and intrajejunal levodopa infusion therapy may have a beneficial effect on pain sensations in Parkinson's disease patients. Among the nondopaminergic pharmacological therapies, prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone and duloxetine may be effective in the treatment of chronic pain in Parkinson's disease. Botulinum toxin (BTX) injections should be considered for the treatment of dystonic Parkinson's disease pain. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may lead to pain relief with a long-lasting effect in Parkinson's disease patients. Physiotherapy and physical activity in general are essential for Parkinson's disease patients suffering from pain. SUMMARY: Pain in Parkinson's disease is not simply a consequence of motor complainants. The management of Parkinson's disease-related pain implicates maintenance of stable levels of dopaminergic drugs. Nondopaminergic pharmacological therapies (prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone, duloxetine, BTX) and nonpharmacological interventions (DBS, physiotherapie) may also be beneficial in treatment of Parkinson's disease pain.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Toxinas Botulínicas/uso terapéutico , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Oxicodona/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad de Parkinson , COVID-19/complicaciones , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Carbidopa/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Neumonía Viral , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Non-motor symptoms (NMS) of Parkinson's disease (PD) are well described in both clinical practice and the literature, enabling their management and enhancing our understanding of PD. NMS can dominate the clinical pictures and NMS subtypes have recently been proposed, initially based on clinical observations, and later confirmed in data driven analyses of large datasets and in biomarker-based studies. In this chapter, we provide an update on what is known about three common subtypes of NMS in PD. The pain (Park-pain), sleep dysfunction (Park-sleep), and autonomic dysfunction (Park-autonomic), providing an overview of their individual classification, clinical manifestation, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and potential treatments.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Autónomo , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Humanos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/etiología , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Sueño , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/terapiaRESUMEN
MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) lesioning is an innovative, safe and effective treatment which provides an innovative development in the field of minimally invasive stereotactic neurosurgery. Based on the application of focused ultrasound energy under full MR planning and thermal imaging control, unilateral lesioning of the thalamus, subthalamic nucleus, and globus pallidus is indicated for the treatment of movement disorders, including essential tremor, Parkinson's disease, and dystonia. We started to apply this technique in February 2019 for the treatment of patients with movement disorders. The authors developed a diagnostic therapeutic care pathway, which is herewith proposed and applied as an explication of standard clinical practice in use. The project was the result of the application of different methods such as Health Technology Assessment (HTA), Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats analysis (SWOT) and Demin -Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) cycle. The aim of this project was to standardize the MRgFUS diagnostic-therapeutic pathway (DTP), describe its application and the appropriateness of different phases (patient selection, intervention phase and follow-up). Here, we described in detail our experience in the DTP application from 2019 up to now in 610 patients with movement disorders.
RESUMEN
Many advances in understanding the pathophysiology of Parkinson disease (PD) have been based on research addressing its motor symptoms and phenotypes. Various data-driven clinical phenotyping studies supported by neuropathological and in vivo neuroimaging data suggest the existence of distinct non-motor endophenotypes of PD even at diagnosis, a concept further strengthened by the predominantly non-motor spectrum of symptoms in prodromal PD. Preclinical and clinical studies support early dysfunction of noradrenergic transmission in both the CNS and peripheral nervous system circuits in patients with PD that results in a specific cluster of non-motor symptoms, including rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder, pain, anxiety and dysautonomia (particularly orthostatic hypotension and urinary dysfunction). Cluster analyses of large independent cohorts of patients with PD and phenotype-focused studies have confirmed the existence of a noradrenergic subtype of PD, which had been previously postulated but not fully characterized. This Review discusses the translational work that unravelled the clinical and neuropathological processes underpinning the noradrenergic PD subtype. Although some overlap with other PD subtypes is inevitable as the disease progresses, recognition of noradrenergic PD as a distinct early disease subtype represents an important advance towards the delivery of personalized medicine for patients with PD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Disautonomías Primarias , Trastorno de la Conducta del Sueño REM , Animales , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Fenotipo , Trastorno de la Conducta del Sueño REM/diagnóstico , Modelos AnimalesRESUMEN
The symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been dominated by the use of dopaminergic medication, but significant unmet need remains, much of which is related to non-motor symptoms and the involvement of non-dopaminergic transmitter systems. As such, little has changed in the past decades that has led to milestone advances in therapy and significantly improved treatment paradigms and patient outcomes, particularly in relation to symptoms unresponsive to levodopa. This review has looked at how pharmacological approaches to treatment are likely to develop in the near and distant future and will focus on two areas: 1) novel non-dopaminergic pharmacological strategies to control motor symptoms; and 2) novel non-dopaminergic approaches for the treatment of non-motor symptoms. The overall objective of this review is to use a 'crystal ball' approach to the future of drug discovery in PD and move away from the more traditional dopamine-based treatments. Here, we discuss promising non-dopaminergic and 'dirty drugs' that have the potential to become new key players in the field of Parkinson's disease treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent concepts suggest that the neuropathological hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD) may in part originate from the enteric nervous system. We evaluated the frequency of functional gastrointestinal disorders in PD patients using Rome IV criteria and correlated the clinical severity of PD. METHODS: PD patients and matched controls were recruited between January 2020 and December 2021. Rome IV criteria were used to diagnose constipation and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Severity of PD motor symptoms was evaluated using UPDRS part III scores and non-motor symptoms using Non-motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS). RESULTS: A total of 99 PD patients and 64 controls were enrolled. The prevalence of constipation (65.7% vs. 34.3%, P < 0.001) and IBS (18.1% vs 5%, P = 0.02) were significantly higher in PD patients than controls. The prevalence of IBS was higher in early-stage PD than advanced-stage PD (14.43% vs. 8.25%, P = 0.02), whereas constipation was more common in advanced stages (71.43% vs. 18.56%, P < 0.001). PD patients with IBS had higher NMSS total scores (P < 0.01) than those without IBS. The severity of IBS correlated with NMSS scores (r = 0.71, P < 0.001), especially subscores in domain 3 assessing mood disorders (r = 0.83, P < 0.001), but not UPDRS part III scores (r = 0.06, P = 0.45). The severity of constipation correlated with the UPDRS part III scores (r = 0.59, P < 0.001) but not the domain 3 mood subscores (r = 0.15, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of IBS and constipation was higher in PD patients than controls and phenotypic correlation supported the occurrence of IBS with higher non-motor symptom burden, especially mood symptoms, in PD patients.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Colon Irritable , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/epidemiología , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Ciudad de Roma , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/etiologíaRESUMEN
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has been discussed in the context of Parkinson's disease (PD) over the last three years. Now that we are entering the long-term phase of this pandemic, we are intrigued to look back and see how and why the community of patients with PD was impacted and what knowledge we have collected so far. The relationship between COVID-19 and PD is likely multifactorial in nature. Similar to other systemic infections, a probable worsening of PD symptoms secondary to COVID-19, either transient or persistent (long COVID), has been demonstrated, while the COVID-19-related mortality of PD patients may be increased compared to the general population. These observations could be attributed to direct or indirect damage from SARS-CoV-2 in the central nervous system (CNS) or could result from general infection-related parameters (e.g., hospitalization or drugs) and the sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., quarantine). A growing number of cases of new-onset parkinsonism or PD following SARS-CoV-2 infection have been reported, either closely (post-infectious) or remotely (para-infectious) after a COVID-19 diagnosis, although such a link remains hypothetical. The pathophysiological substrate of these phenomena remains elusive; however, research studies, particularly pathology studies, have suggested various COVID-19-induced degenerative changes with potential associations with PD/parkinsonism. We review the literature to date for answers considering the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and PD/parkinsonism, examining pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, vaccination, and future directions.