Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 480(11): 2122-2133, 2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36111889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple surgical treatments exist for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), but current practice patterns and short-term complication profiles remain poorly understood. This is in part due to changes in treatment paradigms over the past decade. A more thorough understanding of the evolution in management over this time as well as an appreciation of the preoperative factors associated with both the chosen surgical modality and short-term complications will help inform future surgical considerations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study, we sought to: (1) characterize trends in the surgical management of PHFs over time, including usage rates of various surgical modalities and changes in complication rates; (2) identify preoperative variables associated with the selection of surgical modality; and (3) assess the independent covariates of acute 30-day complications, including demographic variables, injury characteristics, and treatment type. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes to identify individuals with PHF undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty (HA), or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) from 2007 to 2018. The NSQIP database was utilized because of its collection of detailed preoperative demographic information and large repository of clinically derived data, which is felt to be more accurate than claims or administrative data. In total, 5889 patients with PHFs met the inclusion criteria. Patients 17 years or older were included. Patients with isolated greater tuberosity, humeral shaft, and distal humerus fractures; nonunions; malunions; and those undergoing revision procedures were excluded. A Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate surgical trends over time. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to identify covariates associated with surgical modality and complications. Although complications were either classified as major or minor, specific complications were also individually analyzed to avoid potentially misleading conclusions associated with pooling. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with PHFs undergoing RTSA (4% in 2007 and 34% in 2018; p < 0.001) and ORIF (46% in 2007 and 57% in 2018; p < 0.001) increased over time, and the proportion of those undergoing HA (50% in 2007 and 9% in 2018; p < 0.001) decreased. Across each surgical modality, minor complication rates decreased over time (RTSA: 10% in 2018; p < 0.001; ORIF: 5% in 2018; p = 0.01; and HA: 6% in 2018; p = 0.01). After controlling for confounding variables like diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, dialysis, and preoperative blood transfusion, the following factors were independently associated with an increased odds of a patient undergoing RTSA rather than HA: older age, higher BMI, independent functional status, and smoking. The following factors were independently associated with a decreased odds of a patient undergoing ORIF rather than RTSA and HA: older age, higher BMI, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, smoking, steroid/immunosuppressant use, as well as three- and four-part fractures. After controlling for age, ASA classification, functional status, and preoperative blood transfusion, we also found that in the latter part of the study period, arthroplasty (RTSA and HA) was no longer independently associated with 30-day major or minor complications compared with ORIF. CONCLUSION: The increasing utilization of RTSA and decreasing short-term complication rates for fixation and arthroplasty alike represent a substantial change compared even with recent historic norms in the management of proximal humerus fractures. Quantifying demographics, injury characteristics, and comorbidities associated with both the choice of surgical modality and complications serves as the groundwork for decision support tools, which can inform patients and surgeons of the probability of a particular surgical modality being chosen and the risk of complications, based on national benchmarks. Future studies should investigate longer term complication rates, as many differences between the approaches being compared might occur beyond the perioperative period and our study had no means to address questions about complications beyond that period, but obviously those must be considered when choosing a treatment for patients with these injuries. Future work might also investigate the mechanisms behind the decreasing rates of short-term complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Fracturas del Hombro , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Húmero/cirugía , Inmunosupresores , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugía , Esteroides , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Hand Surg Glob Online ; 6(4): 545-550, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39166195

RESUMEN

Purpose: The American Society for Surgery of the Hand developed the Surgery Training and Educational Platform (STEP) in order to assess essential skills in hand surgery. The American Society for Surgery of the Hand designed modules spanning both osseous and soft tissue skills aimed to be cost effective for the purpose of orthopedic surgical education. The STEP curriculum was adapted and implemented at a single military orthopedic residency program. Methods: The following six modules were implemented: (1) depth of plunge, (2) scaphoid pinning, (3) phalangeal fracture pinning, (4) microsurgery, (5) full-thickness skin graft harvest, and (6) wrist arthroscopy. Both first- (PGY1) and second-year (PGY2) residents participated. Scores were calculated according to the original STEP curriculum criteria and were compared with historic data from the previous year. All residents responded to an evaluation questionnaire following the performance of the tasks. Results: The PGY2 cohort outperformed PGY1 cohorts across all modules except for the depth of plunge and scaphoid fixation modules. In the phalangeal pinning module, PGY2s did significantly better when compared with pooled PGY1 performance and their own PGY1 performance (P < .05). In the microsurgery module, PGY2s scored better than pooled PGY1s. In the full-thickness skin grafting module, PGY2s outperformed PGY1s (P < .05). On the post-task evaluation, residents unanimously responded that this was a valuable exercise, but the time required to complete all the modules was significant, similar to that of the previous year survey. Conclusions: The STEP simulation is a cost effective and reliable program to engage residents in hand surgery-related skills. However, adaptations should be encouraged according to institutional resources to provide the most inclusive training platform possible per institutional constraints. The STEP simulation is interpreted by residents as a valuable exercise but requires a significant time commitment that could be a barrier to implementation and regular use. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

3.
J Orthop ; 20: 213-216, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32051671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether intramedullary administration of extended-release minocycline microspheres would affect osseointegration. METHODS: Twenty-two rats were randomized to minocycline or saline femoral intramedullary injection followed by implantation of titanium alloy rods. Following euthanasia at four-weeks, pushout testing was performed and bone-volume-fraction assessed. RESULTS: Pushout strength was marginally greater in minocycline-treated implants (122.5 ± 39.1 N) compared to saline (96.9 ± 26.1 N) (P = 0.098). No difference was observed in energy to maximum load, mean stiffness, or peri-implant bone-volume-fraction (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Peri-implant minocycline administration did not impair implant fixation strength or peri-implant bone-volume, supporting its potential utility as an adjunct to intramedullary implants.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA