Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Circulation ; 139(3): 337-346, 2019 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586728

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), infarct size correlates directly with heart failure and mortality. Preclinical testing has shown that, in comparison with reperfusion alone, mechanically unloading the left ventricle (LV) before reperfusion reduces infarct size and that 30 minutes of unloading activates a cardioprotective program that limits reperfusion injury. The DTU-STEMI pilot trial (Door-To-Unload in STEMI Pilot Trial) represents the first exploratory study testing whether LV unloading and delayed reperfusion in patients with STEMI without cardiogenic shock is safe and feasible. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, randomized exploratory safety and feasibility trial, we assigned 50 patients with anterior STEMI to LV unloading by using the Impella CP followed by immediate reperfusion (U-IR) versus delayed reperfusion after 30 minutes of unloading (U-DR). The primary safety outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. Efficacy parameters included the assessment of infarct size by using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: All patients completed the U-IR (n=25) or U-DR (n=25) protocols with respective mean door-to-balloon times of 72 versus 97 minutes. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rates were not statistically different between the U-IR versus U-DR groups (8% versus 12%, respectively, P=0.99). In comparison with the U-IR group, delaying reperfusion in the U-DR group did not affect 30-day mean infarct size measured as a percentage of LV mass (15±12% versus 13±11%, U-IR versus U-DR, P=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: We report that LV unloading using the Impella CP device with a 30-minute delay before reperfusion is feasible within a relatively short time period in anterior STEMI. The DTU-STEMI pilot trial did not identify prohibitive safety signals that would preclude proceeding to a larger pivotal study of LV unloading before reperfusion. An appropriately powered pivotal trial comparing LV unloading before reperfusion to the current standard of care is required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03000270.


Asunto(s)
Infarto de la Pared Anterior del Miocardio/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Reperfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infarto de la Pared Anterior del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto de la Pared Anterior del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/fisiopatología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/prevención & control , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reperfusión Miocárdica/efectos adversos , Daño por Reperfusión Miocárdica/etiología , Daño por Reperfusión Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Daño por Reperfusión Miocárdica/prevención & control , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Recuperación de la Función , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
2.
Am Heart J ; 224: 98-104, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32361279

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded conflicting results about the impact of transradial access (TRA) versus transfemoral access (TFA) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: We performed a trial sequential analysis (TSA) of RCTs comparing TRA and TFA in patients with STEMI. The outcomes of interest were 30-day mortality, major bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and access site complications. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies with 11,992 patients were included in the current TSA. The TRA group had lower 30-day mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.90, P = .003), major bleeding (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.79, P = .0001), MACE (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.93, P = .01), and access site complications (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28-0.48, P < .00001). There was no difference in MI and stroke between the 2groups. Applying TSA boundaries, the z-curve for 30-day mortality, major bleeding, MACE and access site complications crossed the conventional and the TSA boundaries, indicating firm evidence for better outcomes in the TRA group. For MI and stroke, the z-curve failed to cross the conventional and the TSA boundaries for both outcomes, indicating lack of signals of benefit or harm. CONCLUSIONS: In the current TSA, the available data from RCTs support improved 30-day mortality, major bleeding, MACE and access site complication rates in STEMI patients treated by PCI through the radial access.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Angiografía Coronaria , Arteria Femoral , Humanos , Arteria Radial , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 48(4): 661-667, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31506887

RESUMEN

Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared ticagrelor to clopidogrel after thrombolytic therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). To assess the quality of the current evidence, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) of all the available RCTs was performed. A literature search through electronic databases for relevant RCTs was completed. Trial sequential boundaries were applied to the meta-analysis to guard against statistical error, calculate the information size (IS), and assess the quality of the currently available evidence. The safety outcome was bleeding at 30-days and the efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events at 30-days. There were 3 RCTs with a total of 3999 patients were included. For the safety and efficacy outcomes, there was no difference between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.56-1.60, p = 0.83) and (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.49-1.52, p = 0.62), respectively. The corresponding TSA revealed an IS of 20,928 and 37,266 for safety and efficacy outcomes, respectively. The Z-curves for both outcomes failed to cross the conventional boundary of significance and TSA boundary, indicating no statistical difference between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel group and lack of firm evidence from the currently available RCTs to draw conclusion. Based on the current available RCTs, there is not enough evidence to support or refute better outcomes with ticagrelor in patients with STEMI treated with thrombolytics. Larger RCTs with enough power are needed before firm recommendations can be applied.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Trombolítica
5.
W V Med J ; 109(5): 14-6, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24294705

RESUMEN

We report the case of a 45-year-old postpartum female at low risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) who presented with chest pain, a normal electrocardiogram (ECG) and elevation of serial troponin-T levels. Coronary angiography revealed dissection of the first obtuse marginal branch of the left circumflex coronary artery. The patient was treated medically and discharged home safely. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare condition. In the absence of CAD, it is seen most frequently in young females during the peripartum period. Insult from the hemodynamic stresses during pregnancy and labor combined with the underlying pregnancy related arterial wall changes is the proposed mechanism of dissection in this setting. The normal ECG in the presence of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in this case also demonstrates the occasional electrically silent ECG that can occur during acute compromise of the left circumflex coronary artery.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/complicaciones , Periodo Posparto , Enfermedades Vasculares/congénito , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Dolor en el Pecho/tratamiento farmacológico , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/tratamiento farmacológico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitratos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
JACC Case Rep ; 2(6): 907-910, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34317379

RESUMEN

Percutaneous transaxillary access is currently considered an acceptable alternative to transfemoral approach for large-bore access, especially in the setting of hostile iliofemoral arteries. Few published reports exist concerning complications of upper extremity access. We describe development of an axillary artery pseudoaneurysm and its management following transaxillary access. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA