Plasma Levels of Intact Parathyroid Hormone and Congestion Burden in Heart Failure: Clinical Correlations and Prognostic Role.

Circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations increase in heart failure (HF) and are related to disease severity. The relationship between PTH and congestion is still a matter of debate. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the role of PTH as a marker of congestion and prognosis in HF. We enrolled 228 patients with HF. Intact PTH concentrations and HYDRA score (constituted by: B-type natriuretic peptide, blood urea nitrogen−creatinine ratio, estimated plasma volume status, and hydration status) were evaluated. The study endpoint was all-cause mortality. PTH levels were higher in acute compared with chronic HF and in patients with clinical signs of congestion (i.e., peripheral oedema and orthopnea). PTH concentrations significantly correlated with NYHA class and HYDRA score. At multivariate analysis of HYDRA score, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and corrected serum calcium were independently determinants of PTH variability. Fifty patients (22%) died after a median follow-up of 408 days (interquartile range: 283−573). Using univariate Cox regression analysis, PTH concentrations were associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.003, optimal cut-off: >249 pg/mL­area under-the-curve = 0.64). Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, PTH was no longer associated with death, whereas HYDRA score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and eGFR acted as independent predictors for mortality (HR: 1.96, 0.97, and 0.98, respectively). Our study demonstrated that intact PTH was related to clinical and subclinical markers of congestion. However, intact PTH did not act as an independent determinant of all-cause death in HF patients.

Sex Differences in the Evaluation of Congestion Markers in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.

The impact of sex on the assessment of congestion in acute heart failure (AHF) is still a matter of debate. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate sex differences in the evaluation of congestion at admission in patients hospitalized for AHF. We consecutively enrolled 494 AHF patients (252 female). Clinical congestion assessment, B-type natriuretic peptide levels analysis, blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio (BUN/Cr), plasma volume status estimate (by means of Duarte or Kaplam-Hakim PVS), and hydration status evaluation through bioimpedance analysis were performed. There was no difference in medications between men and women. Women were older (79 ± 9 yrs vs. 77 ± 10 yrs, p = 0.005), and had higher left ventricular ejection fraction (45 ± 11% vs. 38 ± 11%, p < 0.001), and lower creatinine clearance (42 ± 25 mL/min vs. 47 ± 26 mL/min, p = 0.04). The prevalence of peripheral oedema, orthopnoea, and jugular venous distention were not significantly different between women and men. BUN/Cr (27 ± 9 vs. 23 ± 13, p = 0.04) and plasma volume were higher in women than men (Duarte PVS: 6.0 ± 1.5 dL/g vs. 5.1 ± 1.5 dL/g, p < 0.001; Kaplam−Hakim PVS: 7.9 ± 13% vs. −7.3 ± 12%, p < 0.001). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, female sex was independently associated with BUN/Cr and PVS. Female sex was independently associated with subclinical biomarkers of congestion such as BUN/Cr and PVS in patients with AHF. A sex-guided approach to the correct evaluation of patients with AHF might become the cornerstone for the correct management of these patients.

[Follow-up of patients after an acute coronary event: the Apulia PONTE-SCA program]. / Follow-up del paziente dopo sindrome coronarica acuta: il progetto PONTE-SCA Puglia.

BACKGROUND: Patients who suffered from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) need a tight follow-up in order to optimize therapy and prevent adverse events. The aim of the PONTE-SCA Puglia program was to evaluate the impact of an integrated management of patients between hospital and local territorial outpatient facilities on adherence and outcome of patients discharged after ACS event. METHODS: This was a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study which enrolled patients who suffered ACS and/or coronary revascularization in a Hub hospital of ASL Bari. Patients underwent clinical and laboratory evaluation at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the index event. The following endpoints were considered: all-cause mortality, ACS recurrence/cardiac ischemia/angina, restenosis/intrastent thrombosis, stroke/transient ischemic attack, heart failure, all-cause bleeding. We evaluated persistence on therapies and the percentage of patients who attained therapeutic goals. RESULTS: A total of 2476 patients (mean age 67.2 ± 12.0 years, 77.4% male) were enrolled. At 1-year follow-up, 99.5% of patients (p<0.05) were on statin therapy, 16.1% (p<0.01) on ezetimibe, and 9.9% (p<0.01) on proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. All-cause mortality was 3.1% at 1-year follow-up, whereas recurrence of ACS/cardiac ischemia/angina and restenosis/stent thrombosis were 3% and 1.3%, respectively. The prevalence of all bleeding complications was 2.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The PONTE-SCA Puglia program allowed to implement a dedicated taking in charge of patients after an ACS/coronary revascularization event, to manage a dedicated follow-up route for them, to ameliorate persistence on recommended therapies, and to keep lower the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and bleedings.

COMPASS criteria applied to a contemporary cohort of unselected patients with stable coronary artery diseases: insights from the START registry.

AIMS: Recently, the cardiovascular outcomes for people using anticoagulation strategies (COMPASS) trial demonstrated that dual therapy reduced cardiovascular outcomes compared with aspirin alone in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We sought to assess the proportion of patients eligible for the COMPASS trial and to compare the epidemiology and outcome of these patients with those without COMPASS inclusion or with any exclusion criteria in a contemporary, nationwide cohort of patients with stable coronary artery disease. Among the 4068 patients with detailed information allowing evaluation of eligibility, 1416 (34.8%) did not fulfil the inclusion criteria (COMPASS-Not-Included), 841 (20.7%) had exclusion criteria (COMPASS-Excluded), and the remaining 1811 (44.5%) were classified as COMPASS-Like. At 1 year, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, was 0.9% in the COMPASS-Not-Included and 2.0% in the COMPASS-Like (P = 0.01), and 5.0% in the COMPASS-Excluded group (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Among the COMPASS-Like population, patients with multiple COMPASS enrichment criteria presented a significant increase in the risk of MACE (from 1.0% to 3.3% in those with 1 and ≥3 criteria, respectively; P = 0.012), and a modest absolute increase in major bleeding risk (from 0.2% to 0.4%, respectively; P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: In a contemporary real-world cohort registry of stable coronary artery disease, most patients resulted as eligible for the COMPASS. These patients presented a considerable annual risk of MACE that consistently increases in the presence of multiple risk factors.